ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Commun.
Sec. Health Communication
How evidence conflict affects willingness to avoid health information: from the perspective of Compensatory Control Theory
Provisionally accepted
- 1Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, China
- 2Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
This study investigates how conflicting health evidence shapes cancer-screening information avoidance through the lens of compensatory control theory. We conducted a 5×2 between-subjects online experiment (Credamo, China; N = 372, 67% female; Mage = 30.4) in which participants were randomly assigned to read thyroid-screening articles that manipulated evidence conflict (no conflict, statistical conflict, anecdotal conflict, or cross-valence: statistics-support/anecdotes-oppose vs. anecdotes-support/statistics-oppose) and perceived disease control (high vs. low). The dependent variable was health-information avoidance, with message elaboration and ambiguity aversion as mediators. Moderated mediation analyses revealed a clear defensive pathway under low perceived control: conflict increased ambiguity aversion, which in turn increased avoidance (indirect effect = 0.025, 95% CI [0.007, 0.045]). In contrast, the hypothesized engagement pathway via increased elaboration under high control was not supported in the overall model, although a positive relationship between conflict and elaboration was observed in the high-control group. These findings suggest that perceived control shapes whether conflict prompts deeper engagement or defensive withdrawal. Practically, communicators may reduce avoidance by aligning anecdotal and statistical cues—or by embedding control-boosting frames—when targeting low-control audiences.
Keywords: Evidence conflict, Compensatory control, ambiguity aversion, Health information avoidance, Elaboration
Received: 10 Mar 2025; Accepted: 27 Oct 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Zhai, Ou and Nie. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Jiajing Zhai, zhaijiajing0109@gmail.com
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.