ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Commun.
Sec. Media Governance and the Public Sphere
Decoupled Agendas under Repression: Social Media and State Media during COVID-19 in Iran
Provisionally accepted
- 1University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- 2Leibniz University Hannover, Hanover, Lower Saxony, Germany
- 3Center for Strategic Studies, tehran, Iran
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Despite a growing body of research on intermedia agenda-setting (IAS) in the contemporary hybrid media landscape, this line of inquiry remains mainly Western-centered. Furthermore, there is a lack of studies across different social platforms and between social media and official online media in authoritarian regimes. We combined computational, quantitative, qualitative, and discursive methods to address these gaps by investigating intermedia agenda-setting between three popular social media in Iran (Twitter, Telegram, and Instagram) and official news websites during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. Our empirical analyses focused on four distinct datasets collected from January 27, 2020, to April 18, 2020. We find no significant influence between official and social media and no interplatform coupling among social networks, indicating platform-segmented agendas. While canonical health/news topics were common, contentious frames, notably Mismanagement and the politicization of hope and optimism, diverged sharply by platform. Taken together, these results show that in repressive settings, agenda cutting/suppression can decouple state and social spheres, and that user-base composition and platforms' local trajectories, probably more than affordances or blocking alone, shape both intermedia and interplatform agenda independence. By providing a multi-platform, crisis-period map of agendas in Iran and demonstrating a directional test of influence under repression, the study refines IAS for non-democratic contexts and offers a transferable approach for comparative research on crisis communication.
Keywords: Intermedia agenda-setting, Social Media, Agenda-cutting, COVID-19, Iran
Received: 23 Mar 2025; Accepted: 11 Nov 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Kermani, Bayat makou and Behzadian Nejad. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Hossein Kermani, hossein.kermani@univie.ac.at
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.