Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Commun.

Sec. Health Communication

Volume 10 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fcomm.2025.1661474

Why We Believe in Superfoods: Investigating Attitudes, Personality and Message Processing

Provisionally accepted
  • 1VU Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
  • 2Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Introduction: Belief in the benefits of so-called superfoods is widespread, yet little is known about what drives these beliefs, particularly for lesser-known products like moringa. Methods: Two studies investigated how individual predispositions and information processing styles shape attitudes toward moringa among consumers unfamiliar with it. Study 1 (N = 322) used a correlational design to examine the role of superfoods attitudes, personality traits, thinking styles, and social norms. Study 2 (N = 268) employed an experimental design to test how message processing (central vs. peripheral) moderates these relationships. Results: Across both studies, a general positive attitude toward superfoods predicted higher perceived message credibility and more favorable attitudes toward moringa. These effects were especially pronounced under peripheral processing (Study 2). Intuitive thinking and subjective social norms also contributed to positive responses, while analytical thinking and food-health beliefs had weaker or unexpected effects (Study 1). Conclusion: Findings suggest that belief in superfoods is shaped more by intuition, affect, and prior attitudes than by analytical evaluation. Health communication strategies should consider these psychological mechanisms when addressing public perceptions of novel health products.

Keywords: Superfoods, Message credibility, cognitive-experiential self-theory (CEST), elaboration likelihood model (ELM), consumer attitudes, personality traits, Health Hacks

Received: 07 Jul 2025; Accepted: 20 Oct 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Tanis and Buijzen. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Martin Tanis, m.a.tanis@vu.nl

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.