SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Endocrinol., 10 November 2020

Sec. Clinical Diabetes

Volume 11 - 2020 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2020.553288

Additional Benefit of Chinese Medicine Formulae Including Dioscoreae rhizome (Shanyao) for Diabetes Mellitus: Current State of Evidence

  • 1. The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China

  • 2. The Second Clinical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China

  • 3. Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China

  • 4. Guangdong Provincial Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China

  • 5. The China–Australia International Research Centre for Chinese Medicine, School of Health and Biomedical Sciences, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

Abstract

Background:

Chinese medicine has been used to treat diabetes symptoms for thousands of years. Dioscoreae rhizome or Shanyao is a Chinese medicinal herb that is routinely used in the treatment of diabetes mellitus (DM).

Objective:

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the evidence of the added benefits and safety of herbal formulae containing Shanyao in clinical studies and the possible mechanisms of Shanyao in the prevention and treatment of DM in experimental studies.

Methods:

We searched nine databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that included Shanyao in the formulae in the treatment of type 2 DM. Furthermore, experimental studies on the prevention and treatment of DM by Shanyao in English- and Chinese-language databases were identified.

Results:

Fifty-three moderate quality RCTs with herbal formulae containing Shanyao were identified. Results from meta-analysis indicated that Shanyao alone or formulae containing Shanyao in addition to conventional treatments could benefit people with type 2 DM in lowering blood glucose, blood lipids and reducing insulin resistance. Moreover, adverse events were significantly lower in the CHM plus conventional group than those in the conventional group. Shanyao may exert the benefit through various mechanisms including inhibition of α-glucosidase and DPP-IV activity, increase of endogenous GLP-1 and immune regulating activities.

Conclusion:

Evidence from this review suggested that there appeared to be added clinical benefits associated with the use of Shanyao for DM, whether as a food supplement or as a CHM combined with hypoglycemic agents with a good safety profile.

Introduction

Diabetes mellitus (DM) prevalence is growing at an alarming rate worldwide. According to the International Diabetes Federation, about 463 million adults worldwide suffer from DM (1). Among them, China is the country with the largest number of people suffering from DM.

Approximately 95% of the diabetic population is T2DM, followed by type 1 diabetes mellitus, gestational diabetes mellitus, and specific types of diabetes due to other causes (2). Patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus and gestational diabetes mellitus are mainly treated with insulin supplementation and replacement therapy. Specific etiology and pathogenesis of other types of DM vary, and the treatment plan is not unified. Therefore, this study focuses on patients with T2DM.

Epidemiological figures showed that the prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in adults aged 18 and over in China is 10.9% and that of pre-diabetes is 35.7% (3). T2DM is a chronic progressive disease. Da Qing research, a registry cohort study with long term follow-up in China showed that 67.7% of pre-diabetic people will develop DM after six years without early intervention, but the risk of T2DM in the combined diet and exercise group can be reduced by 42% (4). UK Prospective Diabetes Study suggested that strict glycemic control can reduce the risk of diabetic complications (5). Early active management can be more beneficial for diabetic people, which coincides with the idea of “cure disease before disease onset” in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM).

Treating diabetes by conventional medicine includes oral and injectable hypoglycemic agents. Diabetic patients often need a combination of several drugs. Common concerns of doctors and diabetic patients include hypoglycemia, gastrointestinal discomfort, inconvenience of missing medicines and injectable medicines. The Chinese Diabetes Society (CDS) guidelines of 2017 presented information of TCM for diabetes and recommended the use of TCM (6). In China, it has been observed that doctors in the field of diabetes are also looking for diverse treatments including TCM (6).

In TCM, DM belongs to the category of disease called “xiao ke 消渴”. Disease characteristics include thirst, excessive drinking, polyuria, and weight loss. The pathogenesis of DM in TCM is qi and yin deficiency and excessive dryness and heat. Commonly used formulae by TCM practitioners include Liu wei di huang wan 六味地黄丸, Shen qi wan肾气丸, and Ba wei wan八味丸 (7). Shanyao (Dioscoreae rhizome) is the root of Dioscorea opposita Thunb. (8); it is one of the main herbs in the above formulae. Shanyao has been widely used in the treatment of xiao ke消渴or diabetes since the ancient times. It is a popular herb and can also be consumed as a type of food. Active ingredients of Shanyao include polysaccharides, flavonoids, allantoin, choline, and dioscin (914).

This study will review evidence of Shanyao for DM from clinical research and experiment research results from Chinese- and English-language databases and present the evidence on added benefits and safety of herbal formula containing Shanyao in clinical studies. Possible mechanisms of Shanyao in the prevention and treatment of DM in experimental studies are also investigated.

Methods

Systematic Review of Clinical Trials

Search Strategy

We searched English- and Chinese-language databases and followed the methods outlined in the Cochrane Handbook of Systematic Reviews (15). English-language databases included PubMed, ExcerptaMedica Database (Embase), Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), including the Cochrane Library, and Allied and Complementary Medicine Database (AMED); Chinese-language databases included China SinoMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chongqing VIP (CQVIP), and Wanfang. Databases were searched from inception to March 2019. No restrictions were applied.

Search terms were grouped into three blocks: 1) intervention (formulae including Shanyao, dioscoreae rhizome); 2) clinical condition (including type 2 diabetes mellitus); and 3) trial design (including clinical trial, randomized controlled trial).

We also searched reference lists of previous systematic reviews and included studies. Clinical trial registries were also searched including the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry (ANZCTR), Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR), European Union Clinical Trials Register (EU-CTR) and USA National Institutes of Health register (ClinicalTrials.gov). When required, we contacted trial investigators by email or telephone to obtain data. If we didn’t receive a response after four weeks, we marked the unknown information ‘not available’.

Protocol of the review was registered with the PROSPERO international prospective register of systematic reviews (CRD 42019145668).

Study Inclusion Criteria

Study design

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were eligible.

Participants

Adults were diagnosed with T2DM using the following guidelines: 1999 World Health Organization (WHO) (16), Chinese Diabetes Society (17, 18), American Diabetes Association (2), or a description of diagnostic criteria including:

  • Fasting blood glucose (FBG, defined as no caloric intake for at least 8 h) ≥126 mg/dl (7.0 mmol/L),

  • Or 2-h plasma glucose (PG) ≥200 mg/dl (11.1 mmol/L) during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). The test should be performed as described by the WHO, using a glucose load containing the equivalent of 75 g anhydrous glucose dissolved in water.

  • Or A1C ≥6.5% (48 mmol/mol). The test should be performed in a laboratory using a method that is National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program certified and standardized to the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial assay.

  • Or in a patient with classic symptoms of hyperglycemia or hyperglycemic crisis, a random plasma glucose ≥200 mg/dl (11.1 mmol/L). In the absence of unequivocal hyperglycemia, results should be confirmed by repeat testing.

Type of Interventions

CHM, other CM therapies (for example, Chinese medicine dietary therapy), and integrative medicine such as CHM plus hypoglycemic drugs; all the interventions should include Shanyao.

Type of Controls

Conventional therapies recommended in guidelines, including pharmacotherapy, diet therapy and lifestyle interventions.

Outcomes

The primary outcome measures were:

  • Blood glucose tests (fasting blood glucose, post-prandial blood glucose, hemoglobin a1c);

  • Adverse events (AEs);

The secondary outcomes were:

  • Blood lipid metabolism indicators (triglyceride, cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein, high-density lipoprotein);

  • β-cell function indicators: fasting serum insulin (Fins) the unit of FINS is pmol/L or μu/ml will be included (pmol/L = μu/ml × 6.965); HOMA-IR(IR) = FBG × FINS/22.5; HOMA-IS (IS) = 1/(Fins × FPG);

  • Body Mass Index (BMI).

Study Exclusion Criteria

  • Quasi-randomized controlled trials;

  • Prediabetic state;

  • Type 1 diabetes;

  • Gestational diabetes;

  • Other specific types of diabetes included in the American Diabetes Association and Chinese Diabetes Society:

    • Genetic defects of beta-cells

    • Genetic defects in insulin action

    • Diseases of the exocrine pancreas

    • Endocrinopathies

    • Drug or chemical induced diabetes

    • Infections

    • Uncommon forms of immune-mediated diabetes

    • Other genetic syndromes sometimes associated with diabetes

  • Diabetic complications and comorbidities;

  • Integrative medicine studies that used different therapies in the intervention group and control group;

  • If the control group uses a form of Chinese medicine.

Data Extraction and Management

Search results were synthesized by removing duplicates, followed by screening of titles and abstracts by LS and YD. Full texts were obtained and screened by two reviewers (LS and YD). Eligible studies satisfying the inclusion criteria were extracted using EpiData software (EpiData Association, Odense, Denmark). LS and YD extracted the data from the included studies independently and double-checked the data to obtain information on authors, publication year, title, journal, participants’ characteristics, sample size, methodological details, intervention details, treatment duration, outcome measures, and AEs.

Assessment of Risk of Bias in Included Studies

Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration’s procedures (15). RevMan software (Version 5.2.4, Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2012) was used for risk of bias analysis. Items of bias assessed included sequence generation, allocation concealment, blinding of participants, blinding of personnel, blinding of outcome assessment, incomplete outcome data, selective outcome reporting and other bias including baseline imbalance and funding. Egger’s test was used to assess publication bias. Publication bias was assessed when the subgroup included more than 10 studies.

Risk of bias assessment was conducted by two independent reviewers (LS and YD) and disagreement was resolved by discussion or consultation with a third person (TZ).

Data Analysis

Continuous outcomes were presented as mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) between two groups, whereas dichotomous data were presented as relative risk (RR) with 95% CI. Stata software (13.0) was used for data analysis. Considering heterogeneities among trials, all meta-analyses were performed with random effects model. Heterogeneities between studies was estimated by I2. An I2 score greater than 50% was considered to indicate substantial heterogeneity.

Predefined comparisons in the meta-analysis were as follows: (1) CHM plus hypoglycemic agents versus hypoglycemic agents, (2) CHM plus lifestyle intervention versus lifestyle intervention, (3) CHM diet therapy plus lifestyle intervention versus lifestyle intervention.

Subgroup analysis were performed where possible, including studies with low risk for sequence generation, FBG level at baseline(6–≤8 mmol/L, 8–10 mmol/L, ≥10 mmol/L), patient age groups (18–40 years, 41–64 years, >65 years), BMI (normal < 24 kg/m2, overweight ≥ 24–28 kg/m2, obese ≥ 28 kg/m2), disease duration (<5 years, ≥5–10years, ≥10 years), treatment duration (≤3 months, 3–6 months, and ≥6 months), comparator drugs class and CM syndrome differentiation (1923).

The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to assess the quality of evidence.

Pharmacological Research Evidence of Shanyao for DM

The constituent compounds were identified by searching herbal monographs, high quality reviews of CHM, pharmacopoeia of the People’s Republic of China (24), and PubMed. To identify preclinical publications a literature search of PubMed and China National Knowledge Infrastructure was undertaken. The search strategy included the terms for Shanyao and its constituent compounds and T2DM. Relevant data were extracted, and a summary of the findings are reported here.

Results

Modern Literature Results

Description of Included Studies

Search Results

Our search identified 44,958 articles in the included databases. Fifty-three (53) RCTs involving 4,905 participants were included in the systematic review (2577). The screening process is shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1

Characteristics of the Included Studies

All studies were randomized, parallel-group, controlled trials conducted in China between 2002 and 2018. One study published was in English (44) and the rest in Chinese language. All studies included participants diagnosed in accordance with the 1999 WHO, Chinese Diabetes Society or American Diabetes Association diagnostic criteria for T2DM. In total, 4,905 participants were included in these RCTs; participants’ age ranged from 45 to 74 years. Duration of T2DM ranged from 1 week to 20 years. Treatment duration ranged from 2 to 24 weeks. Only one study had a follow-up for 30 weeks (65). Characteristics of included studies are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1

NO.StudySample sizeSample sizeMean age(y)Mean age(y)TreatmentControlDuration(w)FBG2hPGHbA1cTGTCLDLHDLBMIFINSIRISAEs
(I)(C)(I)(C)
1Bai (42)403048.2749.23SMF&Bigu&SulfBigu/Sulf4××××××××
2Cao et al. (77)68684847SMF&BiguBigu8××××××
3Cao and Zou (76)545456.754.5Baihurenshen Formula&SulfSulf8××××××
4Chen (30)242660.3361.35a-Glucosidase or Insulinsa-Glucosidase/Insulins6××××
5Cui and Lou (75)404056.7552.57SMF&Bigu&SulfBigu&Sulf8×××××××××
6Fan et al. (74)404042–7440–73Shenqijiangtang Granule&BiguBigu12×××××××××
7Gao et al. (73)909058.957.6Shenqijiangtang Capsule&BiguBigu12×××××
8Hou (72)303046.1246.78seld-made Formula&Bigu&a-GlucosidaseBigu&a-Glucosidase8×
9Li (25)454569.7669.44Chinese medicine diet therapyNo treatment12××××××
10Li (32)3030NSNSSMF&Bigu&a-GlucosidaseBigu&a-Glucosidase4××××××××
11Li et al. (71)10210057.2058.46Jiangtang Capsule&SulfSulf4××××××
12Lin (40)202056.254.8Zhibodihuang Formula&BiguBigu4×××××××××
13Liu et al. (70)292946.546.9SMF&BiguBigu12××××××
14Liu et al. (69)3030NSNSSMF&DPP4DPP412×××××××××
15Liu (29)303057.356.7SMF&Bigu&SulfBigu&Sulf12××××
16Lou and Zhao (68)525053.554SMF&BiguBigu8×××××××××
17Lv et al (35)606054.6155.77Yuye Formula&insulininsulin4××××××
18Lv et al. (67)453058.958.8SMF&a-Glucosidasea-Glucosidase4×××××××××
19Peng et al. (66)25255758SMF&Bigu&a-GlucosidaseBigu&a-Glucosidase8××××××
20Peng and Xu (36)686874.8675.01Shenqi JiangTang Pill&a-Glucosidasea-Glucosidase7××××××××××
21Shang et al. (65)303048.3647.97SMF&CSIICSII8××××××××××
22Tang and Li (64)696951.650.4Liuweidihuang Pill&BiguBigu12××
23Wang and Wang (27)292759.159.2SMF&Bigu&SulfBigu&Sulf8××××
24Wang (37)303068.267.3SMF&CSIICSII2×××××
25Wang (43)303050.353.2Gankujiangtang Formula&BiguBigu12××
26Wang (33)30305053.7Zhibodihuang Formula&SulfSulf4×××××××
27Wu (28)201851.8554.78SMF&BiguBigu8××××
28Xie and Lu (63)13513335-6436–60Dihuangjiangtang pill&BiguBigu12××××××××
29Xu et al. (62)20205455Shenlinbaizhu Formula&insulininsulin12×××××××××××
30Yang (39)3030NSNSQianwenwu Formula&BiguBigu9×××××
31Yu et al. (60)404056.255.4Taipingtangke Pill&BiguBigu12×××××××××
32Yu et al. (61)303032-6434–67SMF&BiguBigu8××××××××××
33Zhang et al. (59)303046.447.3SMF&BiguBigu4×××××××××
34Zhang et al. (52)323054.456.5SMF&BiguBigu8××××××××
35Zhang et al. (57)362042–5944–57SMF&BiguBigu4×××××××××
36Zhang et al. (58)1005052.650.5SMF&Bigu&SulfBigu&Sulf8××××
37Zhang and Pan (56)1206046.546.4Shendishengjin Capsule&SulfSulf8×××××
38Zhang (41)3030NSNSSMF&Bigu&a-GlucosidaseBigu&a-Glucosidase8××××××××
39Zhang (38)32315456SMF&Bigu&a-GlucosidaseBigu&a-Glucosidase12×××××××××
40Zhang (26)34325149self-made FormulaNo treatment4×××××××××
41Zhang (34)484452.354.2Jiaweishenqidihuang Formula&BiguBigu12×××
42Zhang et al. (55)303045.646.9SMF&SulfSulf8×××××××
43Zhang et al. (54)9379NSNSXiaotangping Capsule&BiguBigu12××××
44Zhang (31)202056.957.1SMF&insulininsulin12×××××
45Zhang et al. (44)10911056.957.1Shen-Qi formula & insulininsulin12××××
46Zhang et al. (53)485055.253.1SMF&insulininsulinns×××××××××
47Zhao and Song (51)706856.553.5SMF&Sulf&BiguSulf/Bigu24×××××××
48Zhou et al. (50)505040–7441–72SMF&SulfSulf12××××××××××
49Zhou and Dong (49)303059.258.6Yiqiyangyin Capsule&SulfSulf4×××××××××
50Zhou and Shen (48)20206059.8SMF&Routine hypoglycemic agentsRoutine hypoglycemic agents12×××××××××
51Zhou et al. (47)124124NSNSErban Formula&BiguBigu12×××××××××
52Zhu and Li (45)303074.276.8Jiangtangqing Granule&insulin secretagogues&a-Glucosidaseinsulin secretagogues&a-Glucosidase12××××
53Zhu et al. (46)353551.753SMF&Bigu&SulfBigu&Sulf12×××××××××

Basic characteristics of the included studies in modern literature.

C, control; I, intervention; CHM, Chinese herbal medicine; F, female; M, male; w, week/weeks; y, year/years; Sulf, Sulfonylureas; Bigu, Biguanides; CSII, continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion; TZDs, Thiazolidinediones; DPP-4, Dipeptidyl Peptidse-4; SMF, self-made Formula.

Fifty-three (53) RCTs assessing CHM as food or integrative medicine for T2DM were identified from the search. 51 studies assessed the combination of CHM with conventional medication (integrative medicine) (2777). One study compared CHM to lifestyle intervention (26); one study compared Chinese medicine diet therapy to lifestyle intervention (25).

Ninety-eight herbs were used in the formulae, and the most commonly used herb used with Shanyao 山药 werehuangqi 黄芪 (42 studies), shengdihuang 生地黄 (30 studies), gegen 葛根 (28 studies), tianhuafen 天花粉 (28 studies), danshen 丹参 (26 studies), fuling 茯苓 (23 studies), maimendong 麦门冬 (22 studies), shanzhuyu 山茱萸 (21 studies), and huanglian 黄连 (16 studies).

Comparators included pharmacologic therapy and lifestyle intervention. Pharmacologic therapy used in the included RCTs includes biguanides, sulfonylureas, thiazolidinediones, a-glucosidase inhibitors, DPP-4 inhibitors, and insulins. Lifestyle management of T2DM includes diabetes self-management education and support, medical nutrition therapy, physical activity, and psychosocial care.

CM syndrome differentiation was described in thirty-four studies (26, 28, 29, 3141, 43, 46, 4850, 52, 53, 55, 57, 5962, 64, 67, 69, 71, 74, 75, 77). The most common syndromes described in the studies include qi and yin deficiency 气阴两虚, yin deficiency and excessive heat 阴虚热盛, damp heat retention 湿热阻滞, spleen deficiency 脾虚, phlegm-dampness, and blood stasis 痰湿血瘀.

Risk of Bias in the Included Studies

The results of the risk of bias judgements are presented in Figure 2 and Figure 3. All included 53 studies were randomized; 15 trials described the process of random sequence generation (25, 26, 31, 32, 34, 37, 38, 43, 44, 46, 62, 64, 65, 69, 73); two trials implemented allocation concealment (25, 37). One study was described as “single-blind“ trial with no further details (37). Considering all included outcome measures were objective outcomes, blinding of assessors has low risk of influencing the outcome measures and was judged as low risk of bias in all included studies. Twelve trials did not report on all outcome measures described in the Methods section (37, 40, 44, 53, 5658, 60, 62, 63, 75, 77), three trials reported on AEs which were not included in the methods section (38, 50, 64). Publication bias was not detected (Egger’s test, t = −0.71, P = 0.48). The overall methodological quality of the included studies was moderate.

Figure 2

Figure 3

Effects of Intervention

CHM Plus Hypoglycaemic Agents Versus Hypoglycaemic Agents
Fasting Blood Glucose

Forty-eight RCTs including 4,375 participants assessed the effects of CHM plus hypoglycemic agents versus hypoglycemic agents alone; these studies used the same hypoglycemic agents in both groups (2761, 64, 6677). Treatment duration ranged from 2 to 24 weeks. Different classes of hypoglycemic agents were used across studies including biguanides, sulfonylureas, α-Glucosidase inhibitors, DPP-4 inhibitors and insulins. Specific hypoglycemic agents include metformin, gliclazide, glibenclamide, gliquidone, glimepiride, acarbose, sitagliptin, and insulin.

The integrative use of CHM plus hypoglycemic agents was superior to hypoglycemic agents alone at reducing FBG levels at the end of treatment [MD −0.93 (−1.10, −0.76); I2 = 84.2%], although heterogeneity was high. Meta-analysis of studies assessed as low risk of bias for sequence generation produced a similar result to the overall results with reduced heterogeneity [11 RCTs, 1,050 participants, MD −0.68 (−0.89, −0.47); I2 = 67.9%] (31, 32, 34, 37, 38, 43, 44, 46, 64, 69, 73).

Subgroup analyses based on comparator drug class, patient age groups, baseline levels of FBG, CM syndrome differentiation, treatment duration, disease duration, and baseline levels of BMI all showed significant differences between groups (Table 2).

Table 2

Treatment Vs. ComparisonOutcomes(unit)GroupSubgroupNo. of StudiesMD[95% CI]I2
CHM plus Hypoglycaemic agents versus Hypoglycaemic agentsFBG
(mmol/L)
All studiesAll studies48(4,375)−0.93[−1.10, −0.76]*84.2%
Risk of bias SGLow risk of bias SG11(1,050)−0.68[−0.89, −0.47]*67.9%
comparator Drug classBiguanides18(1,722)−0.91 [−1.11, −0.70]*63.8%
Sulfonylureas7(770)−0.92 [−1.58, −0.26]*91.9%
Insulin4(477)−0.96[−1.57, −0.35]*85.0%
Biguanides + Sulfonylureas5(416)−1.18[−1.46, −0.89]*0.0%
Biguanides+ a-Glucosidase5(293)−0.97[−1.69, −0.24]*96.4%
Age of patients41–64 years36(3,219)−0.79[−1.02, −0.57]*86.7%
>65 years4(504)−1.28[−1.51, −1.06]*0.0%
FBG level at baseline8–10 mmol/L27(2,413)−0.77[−0.95, −0.59]*74.9%
≥10 mmol/L21(1,962)−1.15[−1.48, −0.82]*89.2%
CM syndrome differentiationqi and yin deficiency23(1,886)−0.97[−1.23, −0.72]*81.6%
yin deficiency and excessive heat6(430)−0.82[−1.05, −0.59]*23.0%
Spleen deficiency3(158)−0.57[−1.10, −0.04]*87.6%
treatment duration≤3 months46(4,139)−0.91[−1.08, −0.73]*83.9%
≥6 months1(138)−1.00[−1.34, −0.66]*NA
Disease duration<14(1,093)−0.80[−1.09, −0.51]*77.2%
≥5–10 years10(924)−1.07[−1.55, −0.59]*90.7%
≥10 years10(1,001)−0.88[−1.14, −0.62]*72.5%
BMI level at baseline≥24–28 kg/m23(193)−0.53[−0.87, −0.19]*0.0%
2hPG
(mmol/L)
All studiesAll studies43(4,004)−1.46[−1.73, −1.20]*86.2%
Risk of bias SGLow risk of bias SG9(895)−1.64[−2.27, −1.02]*91.8%
comparator Drug classBiguanides16(1,572)−1.36[−1.62, −1.11]*44.3%
Sulfonylureas7(770)−1.60[−2.48, −0.72]*89.6%
Insulin3(379)−1.71[−3.37, −0.05]*91.2%
Biguanides + Sulfonylureas5(416)−1.12[−2.22, −0.02]*86.4%
Biguanides + a-Glucosidase5(298)−1.58[−2.41, −0.74]*94.7%
Age of patients41–64 years33(2,968)−1.45[−1.78, −1.12]*86.7%
>65 years2(384)−1.65[−2.92, −0.39]*94.1%
FBG level at baseline8–10 mmol/L24(2 200)−1.38[−1.74, −1.03]*85.6%
≥10 mmol/L19(1,804)−1.56[−1.98, −1.15]*87.3%
CM syndrome differentiationqi and yin deficiency20(1,633)−1.25[−1.67, −0.84]*85.4%
yin deficiency and excessive heat6(430)−1.51[−2.16, −0.87]*71.4%
Spleen deficiency3(158)−0.96[−1.29, −0.63]*44.3%
treatment duration≤3 months42(3,866)−1.46[−1.73, −1.18]*86.3%
≥6 months1(138)−1.73[−2.07, −1.39]*NA
Disease duration<5 years14(1,093)−1.57[−2.00, −1.15]*75.9%
≥5–10 years9(866)−1.35[−2.11, −0.59]*92.7%
≥10 years7(783)−1.38[−2.16, −0.61]*92.4%
BMI level at baseline≥24–28 kg/m22(98)−1.35[−2.25, −0.46]*46.6%
HbA1c
(%)
All studiesAll studies35(3,009)−0.84[−1.05, −0.64]*88.2%
Risk of bias SGLow risk of bias SG9(920)−0.74[−1.16, −0.32]*93.9%
comparator Drug classBiguanides17(1,665)−0.85[−1.04, −0.66]*75.1%
Sulfonylureas2(120)−.65[−1.07, −0.24]*0.0%
Insulin3(357)−1.43[−2.69, −0.18]*94.8%
Biguanides + Sulfonylureas3(196)−0.35[−0.68, −0.02]*0.0%
Biguanides + a-Glucosidase4(248)−0.85[−1.68, −0.02]*96.7%
Age of patients41–64 years27(2,209)−0.77[−0.99, −0.55]*85.1%
>65 years3(368)−0.95[−1.76, −0.14]*77.2%
FBG level at baseline8–10 mmol/L22(1,935)−0.73[−0.97, −0.50]*87.5%
≥10 mmol/L13(1,074)−1.04[−1.41, −0.67]*86.9%
CM syndrome differentiationqi and yin deficiency17(1,208)−0.67[−0.91, −0.44]*72.8%
yin deficiency and excessive heat4(300)−0.82[−1.21, −0.43]*69.3%
Spleen deficiency3(158)−1.07[−2.21, 0.07]97.3%
treatment duration≤3 months33(2,773)−0.82[−1.04, −0.61]*88.5%
≥6 months1(138)−0.60[−0.99, −0.21]*NA
Disease duration<5 years11(717)−0.72[−0.97, −0.47]*64.6%
≥5–10 years6(532)−0.91[−1.34, −0.48]*79.8%
≥10 years9(893)−0.90[−1.39, −0.42]*94.0%
BMI level at baseline≥24–28 kg/m23(193)−0.30[−0.62, 0.02]39.9%
TG
(mmol/L)
All studiesAll studies24(2,582)−0.40[−0.51, −0.29]*79.2%
Risk of bias SGLow risk of bias SG7(792)−0.36[−0.50, −0.22]*50.5%
comparator Drug classBiguanides10(1,205)−0.39[−0.53, −0.24]*65.5%
Sulfonylureas2(382)−0.06[−0.12, 0.00]0.0%
Insulin3(379)−0.46[−0.74, −0.18]*56.5%
Biguanides + Sulfonylureas3(266)−0.37[−0.58, −0.17]*40.0%
Biguanides + a-Glucosidase2(110)−0.37[−0.52, −0.21]*0.0%
Age of patients41–64 years20(2,230)−0.37[−0.48, −0.26]*73.3%
>65 years2(120)−0.59[−0.81, −0.37]*0.0%
FBG level at baseline8–10 mmol/L13(1,342)−0.36[−0.45, −0.27]*32.1%
≥10 mmol/L10(972)−0.43[−0.64, −0.22]*88.1%
CM syndrome differentiationqi and yin deficiency8(773)−0.34[−0.52, −0.15]*76.1%
yin deficiency and excessive heat2(198)−0.19[−0.33, −0.05]*0.0%
Spleen deficiency1(38)−0.85[−1.73, 0.03]NA
Disease duration<5 years7(800)−0.31[−0.45, −0.18]*48.3%
≥5–10years6(612)−0.49[−0.81, −0.17]*92.7%
≥10 years6(695)−0.49[−0.62, −0.37]*6.8%
BMI level at baseline≥24–28 kg/m23(193)−0.57[−0.87, −0.28]*44.1%
TC
(mmol/L)
All studiesAll studies24(2,582)−0.40[−0.58, −0.22]*95.2%
Risk of bias SGLow risk of bias SG7(792)−0.34[−0.86, 0.19]98.3%
comparator Drug classBiguanides10(1,205)−0.36[−0.70, −0.02]*97.6%
Sulfonylureas2(382)−0.28[−0.82, 0.25]89.1%
Insulin3(379)−0.13[−0.60, 0.34]77.1%
Biguanides + Sulfonylureas3(266)−0.69[−1.59, 0.21]73.9%
Biguanides + a-Glucosidase2(110)−0.44[−0.74, −0.15]*0.0%
Age of patients41–64 years20(2,230)−0.39[−0.59, −0.18]*96.0%
>65 years2(120)−0.46[−0.99, 0.08]57.8%
FBG level at baseline8–10 mmol/L13(1,342)−0.39[−0.70, −0.08]*97.0%
≥10 mmol/L10(972)−0.50[−0.66, −0.34] *66.5%
CM syndrome differentiationqi and yin deficiency8(773)−0.40 [−0.67, −0.12] *95.9%
yin deficiency and excessive heat2(198)−0.77[−1.92, 0.38]98.7%
Spleen deficiency1(38)0.12[−0.38, 0.62]NA
Disease duration<5 years7(800)−0.39[−0.94, 0.16]96.0%
≥5–10 years6(612)−0.63[−0.77, −0.50]*76.8%
≥10 years6(695)−0.16[−0.43, 0.11]71.3%
BMI level at baseline≥24–28 kg/m23(193)−0.02[−0.15, 0.10]10.6%
LDL
(mmol/L)
AllAll studies21(2,338)−0.45[−0.65, −0.27]*97.4%
Risk of bias SGLow risk of bias SG7(792)−0.68[−1.10, −0.26]*97.9%
comparator Drug classBiguanides8(1,031)−0.51[−0.88, −0.14]*98.5%
Sulfonylureas2(382)−0.06[−0.16,0.04]0.0%
Insulin3(379)−0.57[−1.18, 0.05]97.6%
Biguanides + Sulfonylureas3(266)−0.45[−0.60, −0.30]*0.0%
Biguanides + a-Glucosidase2(110)−0.39[−0.66, −0.12]*78.1%
Age of patients41–64 years17(1,986)−0.45[−0.69, −0.21]*97.7%
>65 years2(120)−0.73[−1.82, 0.35]78.9%
FBG level at baseline8–10 mmol/L12(1,206)−0.53[−0.83, −0.22]*97.7%
≥10 mmol/L8(864)−0.23[−0.33, −0.13]*68.4%
CM syndrome differentiationqi and yin deficiency7(637)−0.29[−0.44, −0.15]*75.1%
yin deficiency and excessive heat2(198)−0.79[−2.03, 0.46]99.4%
Disease duration<5 years6(762)−0.59[−1.08, −0.09]*98.8%
≥5–10 years5(542)−0.31[−0.46, −0.16]*80.7%
≥10 years5(559)−0.64[−1.11, −0.17]*95.5%
BMI level at baseline≥24–28 kg/m22(155)−0.27[−0.35, −0.20]*0.0%
HDL
(mmol/L)
AllAll studies21(2,338)0.15[0.08, 0.22]*93.9%
Risk of bias SGLow risk of bias SG7(792)0.18[0.07, 0.29]*93.3%
comparator Drug classBiguanides8(1,031)0.24[0.14, 0.33]*89.6%
Sulfonylureas2(382)0.18[−0.21, 0.58]96.8%
Insulin3(379)0.20[0.05, 0.34]*93.6%
Biguanides + Sulfonylureas3(266)0.02[−0.17, 0.21]81.0%
Biguanides + a-Glucosidase2(110)−0.04[−0.12, 0.04]21.1%
Age of patients41–64 years17(1 986)0.16[0.08, 0.25]*94.6%
>65 years2(120)0.01[-0.05,0.07]0.0%
FBG level at baseline8–10 mmol/L12(1,206)0.13[0.04, 0.22]*93.5%
≥10 mmol/L8(864)0.12[0.02, 0.22]*89.8%
CM syndrome differentiationqi and yin deficiency7(637)0.17[0.09, 0.25]*75.5%
yin deficiency and excessive heat2(198)0.16[−0.04, 0.35]82.7%
Disease duration<5 years6(762)0.13[−0.04, 0.31]94.3%
≥5–10 years5(542)0.17[0.07, 0.27]*84.9%
≥10 years5(559)0.16[−0.00, 0.33]95.7%
BMI level at baseline≥24–28 kg/m22(155)0.03[−0.18, 0.23]90.8%
FINS
(mU/Lor μIU/ml)
All studiesAll studies12(1,049)−1.03 [−2.35, 0.29]86.9%
Risk of bias SGLow risk of bias SG5(413)−1.60[−4.42, 1.21]92.3%
comparator Drug classBiguanides3(293)−2.89[−6.96, 1.18]95.7%
Sulfonylureas3(228)−2.03[−3.21, −0.84]*0.0%
Biguanides + Sulfonylureas1(150)0.60[−1.16, 2.36]NA
Biguanides + a-Glucosidase1(60)−2.10[−2.79, −1.41]NA
Age of patients41–64 years10(929)−1.46[−2.85, −0.07]*88.2%
>65 years1(60)1.32[-2.11,4.75]NA
FBG level at baseline8–10 mmol/L8(641)-1.95[-3.45,-0.45]*87.4%
≥10 mmol/L3(348)1.62[0.09,3.15]32.2%
CM syndrome differentiationqi and yin deficiency3(215)0.17[−2.08, 2.42]47.4%
yin deficiency and excessive heat3(258)−3.43[−7.37, 0.49]95.3%
treatment duration≤3 months11(911)−1.41[−2.68, −0.15]*84.5%
≥6 months1(138)2.85[0.96, 4.73]NA
Disease duration<5 years5(378)−2.96[−4.93, −0.99]90.7%
≥10 years2(168)−0.80[−4.34, 2.74]70.1%
BMI level at baseline≥24–28 kg/m22(155)−1.19[−3.21, 0.82]81.8%
IRAll studiesAll studies7(581)−1.11[−1.44, −0.77]*55.0%
Risk of bias SGLow risk of bias SG4(353)−1.14[−1.67, −0.60]*72.6%
comparator Drug classBiguanides3(293)−0.80[−1.04, −0.56]*0.0%
Sulfonylureas2(168)−1.30[−1.85, −0.75]*0.0%
Biguanides + a-Glucosidase1(60)−0.98[−1.52, −0.44]*NA
FBG level at baseline8–10 mmol/L6(521)−0.91[−1.12, −0.69]*5.5%
CM syndrome differentiationqi and yin deficiency1(95)−0.90[−1.28, −0.52]NA
yin deficiency and excessive heat3(258)−0.79[−1.10, −0.48]*3.5%
Disease duration<5 years4(318)−0.82[−1.08, −0.57]*0.0%
≥10 years1(108)−1.49[−2.23,-0.75]*NA
BMI level at baseline≥24–28 kg/m22(155)−0.93[−1.24, −0.62]*0.0%
ISAll studiesAll studies5(434)0.09[-0.26,0.43]95.0%
comparator Drug classBiguanides2(210)−0.14[−0.97, 0.69]98.7%
Sulfonylureas2(168)0.17[0.05, 0.28]*0.0%
Biguanides + Sulfonylureas1(56)0.56[0.05, 1.07]*NA
Age of patients41–64 years4(262)0.23[0.12, 0.34]*34.6%
FBG level at baseline8–10 mmol/L3(224)0.19[0.03, 0.36]*35.4%
≥10 mmol/L2(210)−0.14[−0.98, 0.69]98.7%
CM syndrome differentiationyin deficiency and excessive heat1(60)0.21[0.06,0.36]*NA
Spleen deficiency1(38)0.28[0.18, 0.38]*NA
Disease duration<5 years3(154)0.27[0.19, 0.35]*0.0%
≥5–10 years1(172)−0.57[−0.74, −0.40]NA
≥10 years1(108)0.09[−0.11, 0.29]NA
BMI level at baseline≥24–28 kg/m21(38)0.28[0.18,0.38]*NA
BMI
(kg/m2)
All studiesAll studies4(233)−0.45[−0.99, 0.08]9.4%
Risk of bias SGLow risk of bias SG2(135)−0.38[−2.83, 2.07]68.4%
CHM vs. lifestyle interventionFBG
(mmol/L)
All studiesAll studies1(72)−0.62 [−1.28, 0.04]NA
2hPG
(mmol/L)
All studiesAll studies1(72)−2.14[−2.81, −1.47]*NA
CHM as food vs. Lifestyle interventionFBG
(mmol/L)
All studiesAll studies1(90)−1.08[−1.86, −0.30]*NA
2hPG
(mmol/L)
All studiesAll studies1(90)−1.23[−1.96, −0.50]*NA
TG
(mmol/L)
All studiesAll studies1(90)−0.30[−0.69, 0.09]NA
TC
(mmol/L)
All studiesAll studies1(90)−0.66[−1.10, −0.23]*NA

Summary of meta-analysis results and sub-group analysis.

*Statistically significant difference between groups.

CI, confidence interval; CM, Chinese medicine; FBG, fasting blood glucose; 2hPG, 2-hour postprandial blood glucose; HbA1c, hemoglobin A1c; TG, triglyceride; TC, total cholesterol; LDL, low density lipoprotein; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; FINS, fasting insulin; IR, insulin resistance; IS, insulin resistance index; BMI, body mass index; MD, mean difference; SG, sequence generation.

2-h Postprandial Blood Glucose. Forty-three RCTs including 4,004 participants assessed the effects of CHM plus hypoglycemic agents compared to hypoglycemic agents alone (2733, 35, 36, 3844, 4652, 5461, 64, 6669, 7177). All studies used the same hypoglycemic agent in both groups. Hypoglycemic agents included biguanides, sulfonylureas, α-glucosidase inhibitors, DPP-4 inhibitors, and insulins. Specific agents include metformin, gliclazide, glibenclamide, glimepiride, gliquidone, glipizide, pioglitazone, acarbose, voglibose, sitagliptin, and insulin. Treatment duration ranged from 4 to 24 weeks.

Meta-analysis results showed that as integrative medicine, CHM plus hypoglycemic agents was superior to hypoglycemic agents alone at reducing 2hPG levels at the end of treatment [MD −1.46 (−1.73, −1.20), I2 = 86.2%]. Heterogeneity remained high after sensitivity analysis with studies with low risk of bias for sequence generation [nine studies, n = 895, MD −1.64 (−2.27, −1.02); I2 = 91.8%] (31, 32, 38, 43, 44, 46, 64, 69, 73) (Table 2).

Grouping of studies using metformin produced the biggest pool with 16 RCTs and 1,572 participants. The effect on 2hPG is similar to the overall result with reduced heterogeneity [MD −1.46 (−1.73, −1.20); I2 = 44.3%] (28, 39, 40, 43, 47, 52, 54, 57, 5961, 64, 68, 73, 74, 77). Combinations of different drug classes also showed a significant difference between groups, but heterogeneity remained high. Additional subgroup analyses based on patient age groups, baseline levels of FBG, CM syndrome differentiation, treatment duration, disease duration, and baseline levels of BMI all showed significant differences between groups (Table 2).

Hemoglobin A1c. Thirty-five RCTs including 3,009 participants assessed the effects of CHM plus hypoglycemic agents versus hypoglycemic agents alone (2732, 34, 3745, 4749, 5155, 57, 59, 60, 64, 67, 68, 70, 7277). All studies used the same hypoglycemic agents in both groups, including biguanides, sulfonylureas, α-glucosidase inhibitors, and insulins. Specific agents include metformin, gliclazide, glipizide, gliquidone, voglibose, acarbose, and insulin. Treatment duration ranged from 2 to 24 weeks.

CHM plus hypoglycemic agents was superior to hypoglycemic agents alone [MD −0.84 (−1.05, −0.64), I2 = 88.2%]. Heterogeneity remained high in subgroup analysis except in two subgroups where sulfonylureas or biguanides plus sulfonylureas were combined with CHM (Table 2). In two RCTs with 120 participants, the result indicated that the value of HbA1c was reduced in people receiving CHM plus sulfonylureas compared to sulfonylureas alone [MD −0.65 (−1.07, −0.24), I2 = 0.0%] (49, 55). CHM plus biguanides and sulfonylureas were used as comparator in three RCTs, including 196 participants; the result showed that in the integrative medicine group, HbA1c significantly lower compared to pharmacotherapy group alone [MD −0.35 (−0.68, −0.02), I2 = 0.0%] (27, 29, 75).

Blood Lipid Metabolism Indicators

Total Cholesterol. Twenty-four RCTs including 2,582 participants assessed the effects of CHM plus hypoglycemic agents versus hypoglycemic agents alone (2731, 34, 35, 37, 39, 4245, 54, 56, 58, 63, 64, 66, 7073, 77). All studies used the same hypoglycemic agents in both groups; specific agents include metformin, glibenclamide, glipizide, glimepiride, acarbose, and insulin. Treatment duration ranged from 2 to 12 weeks.

Meta-analyses showed that CHM in addition to hypoglycemic agents was superior to hypoglycemic agents alone at reducing TG levels in T2DM patients [MD −0.40 (−0.51, −0.29), I2 = 79.2%]. Meta-analysis of studies assessed as low risk for sequence generation produced a similar result that was more homogeneous [seven RCTs, 792 participants, MD −0.36 (−0.50, −0.22); I2 = 50.5%] (31, 34, 37, 43, 44, 64, 73).

Subgroup analyses by patient age groups, FBG level at baseline, disease duration and BMI levels at baseline showed similar effects on TG (Table 2). Combined use of CHM with biguanides, insulin, biguanides plus sulfonylureas and biguanides plus a-Glucosidase also produced significant difference between groups; results are like the overall analysis (Table 2).The combination of CHM to a sulfonylureas did not produce a better result than these agents alone (56, 71) (Table 2). In studies that provided details on CM syndrome differentiation, adding CHM to hypoglycemic agents showed more benefit in reducing TG levels in patients with qi and yin deficiency (29, 31, 34, 35, 37, 39, 71, 77), yin deficiency with excessive heat (43, 64), but not those with spleen deficiency (28) (Table 2).

Triglyceride. Twenty-four RCTs including 2,582 participants assessed the effects of CHM plus hypoglycemic agents versus hypoglycemic agents alone (2731, 34, 35, 37, 39, 4245, 54, 56, 58, 63, 64, 66, 7073, 77). All studies used the same hypoglycemic agents in both groups; specific agents include metformin, glibenclamide, glipizide, glimepiride, acarbose, and insulin. Treatment duration ranged from 2 to 12 weeks.

Meta-analyses showed that CHM in addition to hypoglycemic agents was superior to hypoglycemic agents alone at reducing TC levels in T2DM patients [MD −0.40 (−0.58, −0.22), I2 = 95.2%]. Meta-analysis of studies assessed as low risk of bias for sequence generation showed no difference between groups [seven RCTs, 792 participants, MD −0.34 (−0.86, 0.19); I2 = 98.3%] (31, 34, 37, 43, 44, 64, 73).

Subgroup analysis showed that the combination of CHM with sulfonylureas (56, 71), insulin (31, 35, 44), or biguanides plus sulfonylureas (27, 29, 58) was not superior at reducing TC levels (Table 2). Studies with patient’s age group of 41–61years (20 RCTs, n = 2,230) (2731, 34, 35, 4244, 56, 58, 63, 64, 66, 7073, 77) showed a significant difference between the two groups [MD −0.39 (−0.59, −0.18); I2 = 96.0%] but not in the two studies with patients who are older [n = 120, MD −0.46 (−0.99, 0.08); I2 = 57.8%] (37, 45). Subgroup analyses by FBG level at baseline showed similar effects on TC. Analysis on studies that provided CM syndrome information showed that integrative medicine was superior to hypoglycemic agents alone in patients with qi and yin deficiency (29, 31, 34, 35, 37, 39, 71, 77), but not those with yin deficiency and excessive heat (43, 64) or spleen deficiency (28) (Table 2). Studies with disease duration was 5–10 years [six RCTs, n = 612, MD −0.63 (−0.77, −0.50); I2 = 76.8%] (29, 54, 66, 70, 71) showed a significant difference between the two groups but not in the study with disease duration of less than 5 years (27, 28, 43, 56, 63, 64, 72) or equal or more than 10 years (31, 37, 44, 45, 73, 77) disease duration subgroup (Table 2). Additional subgroup analyses by BMI level at baseline showed no difference between groups (Table 2).

Low Density Lipoprotein and High-Density Lipoprotein. Twenty-one RCTs including 2,338 participants assessed the effects of CHM plus hypoglycemic agents versus hypoglycemic agents alone (27, 2931, 34, 35, 37, 39, 4345, 54, 56, 58, 63, 64, 66, 7073). Different classes of hypoglycemic agents were used, and treatment duration ranged from 2 to 12weeks.

Meta-analysis of 21 studies showed that CHM plus hypoglycemic agents was superior to hypoglycemic agents alone at reducing LDL levels at the end of treatment [MD −0.45 (−0.65, −0.27); I2 = 97.4%]; however, heterogeneity was high. Seven studies were assessed as low risk of bias for sequence generation, subgroup analysis showed similar results to the overall studies (31, 34, 37, 43, 44, 64, 73). Subgroup analysis by drug class showed that CHM added to sulfonylureas (56, 71) or insulin (31, 35, 44) was no superior at reducing LDL levels compared to sulfonylureas or insulin alone (Table 2). Subgroup analyses by FBG level at baseline, disease duration or BMI level at baseline showed similar effects on LDL. Studies with age group of 41–64 years showed significant between group results (27, 2931, 34, 35, 43, 44, 56, 58, 63, 64, 66, 7073). In studies that provided details on CM syndrome differentiation, subgroup analysis showed that CHM is better at reducing LDL levels in patients with qi and yin deficiency (29, 31, 34, 35, 37, 39, 71), but not in those with yin deficiency and excessive heat (43, 64) (Table 2).

Meta-analysis result of 21 studies showed that CHM plus hypoglycemic agents was superior to hypoglycemic agents alone at improving HDL levels [MD 0.15 (0.08, 0.22); I2 = 93.9%]; however, heterogeneity was high. Results from studies with a low risk of bias for sequence generation produced a similar result (31, 34, 37, 43, 44, 64, 73) (Table 2). Subgroup analysis by drug class showed that CHM in combination with biguanides (34, 39, 43, 54, 63, 64, 70, 73), or insulin (31, 35, 44) can improve HDL levels better than using the agents alone (Table 2). Studies with patient age group of 41–64 years showed significant between group results (27, 2931, 34, 35, 43, 44, 56, 58, 63, 64, 66, 7073) but not in two studies with older age groups (37, 47). Subgroup analysis using FBG level at baseline showed significant differences between groups with high heterogeneity (Table 2). In T2DM patients with qi and yin deficiency (29, 31, 34, 35, 37, 39, 71), integrative medicine was better at improving HDL levels than hypoglycemic agents alone (Table 2). Studies with disease duration was 5–10 years (five RCTs, n = 542) (29, 54, 66, 70, 71) showed a significant difference between the two groups but not in studies with a disease duration of less than 5 years (27, 43, 56, 63, 64, 72) or more than 10 years (31, 37, 44, 45, 73) (Table 2). Additional subgroup analyses by BMI level at baseline showed no difference between groups (Table 2).

β-Cell Function Indicators

Fasting Insulin. Twelve RCTs including 1,049 participants assessed the effects of CHM plus hypoglycemic agents versus hypoglycemic agents alone (33, 34, 43, 45, 51, 55, 58, 64, 65, 69, 72, 76). Different classes of hypoglycemic agents were included and treatment duration ranged from 4 to 24 weeks.

At the end of treatment, CHM plus hypoglycemic agents was not superior to hypoglycemic agents alone at reducing FINS levels [MD −1.03 (−2.34, 0.29), I2 = 86.9%]. Meta-analysis of results from studies with a low risk of bias for sequence generation showed similar results from the overall result (34, 43, 64, 65, 69). Subgroup analysis by hypoglycemic agent class showed varied results for different class of drugs; there were benefits seen in the addition of CHM to sulfonylureas but not in other hypoglycaemic agents (Table 2). Studies with patient age group of 41–64 years showed significant difference between group results (33, 34, 43, 51, 55, 58, 64, 65, 72, 76) but not in older subgroup (45). Subgroup analysis based on FBG level at baseline, the lower reading of 8–10 mmol/L subgroup (33, 34, 43, 55, 64, 69, 72, 76) showed more benefit but not in higher subgroup (45, 51, 58). Studies with a shorter treatment duration of less than 3 months showed benefit in adding CHM to hypoglycaemic agents (33, 34, 43, 45, 55, 58, 64, 65, 69, 72, 76), but not in studies with a longer treatment (51). Additional subgroup analyses by CM syndrome differentiation, disease duration and BMI level at baseline showed no difference between groups (Table 2).

Homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance. Seven RCTs including 581 participants assessed the effects of CHM plus hypoglycemic agents versus hypoglycemic agents alone (33, 34, 43, 64, 65, 72, 76). Hypoglycemic agents included biguanides, sulfonylureas, α-glucosidase inhibitors, and insulins. Treatment duration ranged from 4 to 12 weeks.

CHM plus hypoglycemic agents was superior to hypoglycaemic agents alone [MD −1.11 (−1.44, −0.77); I2 = 55.0%]. Meta-analysis of results from studies with a low risk of bias for sequence generation showed similar results (34, 43, 64, 65); however, heterogeneity was high. Subgroup analyses based on drug class, baseline levels of FBG, disease duration and baseline levels of BMI all showed significant differences between groups (Table 2). Subgroup analysis by CM differentiation showed benefit of adding CHM to hypoglycemic group than hypoglycemic agents alone in patients with yin deficiency and excessive heat (33, 43, 64) (Table 2).

Insulin resistance index. Five RCTs including 434 participants assessed the effects of CHM plus hypoglycemic agents versus hypoglycemic agents alone (27, 28, 33, 54, 76). Various hypoglycemic agents were used including metformin, gliclazide, and glimepiride. All studies had a treatment duration of less than or equal to 12 weeks; the shortest treatment duration was 4 weeks.

Meta-analysis showed that CHM plus hypoglycemic agents was not superior to hypoglycemic agents alone [MD 0.09 (−0.26, 0.43), I2 = 95.0%]. Subgroup analysis by drug class showed benefit in adding CHM to sulfonylureas (33, 76) and the combination of biguanides with sulfonylureas (27). No significant difference was observed when CHM was added to biguanides (28, 54). Subgroup analysis using age of patients of 41–64 years showed benefit (27, 28, 33, 76). Subgroup analysis based on lower FBG level at baseline (8–10 mmol/L) (27, 33, 76) showed more benefit but not in the higher subgroup (28, 54). In studies that provided information on CM differentiation, meta-analyses showed a benefit in adding CHM to hypoglycemic agents in patients with yin deficiency and excessive heat (33) or spleen deficiency (28). Studies with disease duration of less than 5 years (three RCTs, n = 154) (27, 28, 33) showed a significant difference between the two groups but not those studies with more than 5 years of disease duration (54, 76). Additional subgroup analyses by BMI level at baseline showed difference between groups (28) (Table 2).

Body Mass Index. Four RCTs including 233 participants assessed the effects of CHM plus hypoglycemic agents versus hypoglycemic agents alone (28, 34, 62, 72). Hypoglycemic agents included biguanides, α-Glucosidase inhibitors and insulins. Specific agents include metformin, acarbose, and insulin. Treatment duration ranged from 8 to 12 weeks.

Meta-analysis results showed that CHM plus hypoglycemic agents was not superior to hypoglycemic agents alone at improving BMI [MD −0.45 (−0.99, 0.08); I2 = 9.4%). Meta-analysis of studies assessed as low risk for sequence generation produced a similar result [two studies, 135 participants, MD −0.38 (−2.83, 2.07); I2 = 68.4%] (34, 62), and no difference was found between groups.

CHM Plus Lifestyle Intervention Versus Lifestyle Intervention Alone

One RCT with 72 participants compared CHM (including Shanyao) plus lifestyle intervention with lifestyle intervention for 4 weeks (26). The result showed CHM together with lifestyle intervention was superior to lifestyle intervention alone in reducing 2hPG and TC levels at the end of treatment [MD −2.14 (−2.81, −1.47), −0.66 (−1.10, −0.23)]; there was no difference in the FBG and TG levels between the two groups [MD −0.62 (−1.28, 0.04), −0.30 (−0.69, 0.09)].

CHM Diet Therapy Plus Lifestyle Intervention Versus Lifestyle Intervention Alone

One RCT (n = 90) compared CHM as diet therapy (including Shanyao) with lifestyle intervention with a treatment duration of 12 weeks (25). The result showed that combination of Chinese diet therapy using Shanyao and lifestyle intervention was superior to lifestyle intervention alone at reducing FBG and 2hPG levels at the end of treatment [MD −1.08 (−1.86, −0.30), −1.23 (−1.96, −0.50)].

Adverse Events

Out of the 53 studies, 21 studies reported on AEs. Of these, 10 studies provided specific details about the AEs.

CHM Plus Hypoglycaemic Agents vs. Hypoglycaemic Agents. In twenty RCTs of CHM plus hypoglycemic drugs versus hypoglycemic drugs, ten studies reported no AEs (28, 30, 32, 41, 51, 52, 55, 72, 76, 77), ten studies provided specific details about AEs (29, 37, 4346, 53, 56, 58, 64). In the integrative medicine group, the most common AEs were hypoglycemia (four cases), nausea (three cases), hypertension (two cases), insomnia (one case), epigastric discomfort (two cases), diarrhea (two cases), frequency of urine (three cases), drug-related adverse reactions (one case unknown). There were three cases of diarrhea reported; however, it was not clear whether the AEs were from the treatment group or the control group (43).

Twenty-four AEs were reported in the hypoglycemic drug group. In the hypoglycemic agents group, hypoglycemia (seven cases) was the most common AE. Other AEs included nausea (three cases), headache (two cases), stomach distention (three cases), dyspepsia (two cases), fatigue (two cases), rash (one case), and four other AEs were not described in detail.

One study that compared CHM plus lifestyle intervention to lifestyle intervention reported no AEs (26).

Assessment Using GRADE

An assessment of the quality of the evidence from RCTs was undertaken using GRADE. Interventions, comparators, and outcomes included were selected based on a consensus process. Comparisons were: CHM plus hypoglycemic agents versus hypoglycemic agents, CHM plus lifestyle intervention versus lifestyle intervention and CHM diet therapy plus lifestyle intervention versus lifestyle intervention.

Evidence of Shanyao formulae for T2DM was low to moderate quality (Table 3). The results showed that oral formulae containing Shanyao may improve glycolipid metabolism and fasting insulin level.

Table 3

Outcomes№ of participants(studies)Follow-upCertainty of the evidence(GRADE)Anticipated absolute effects
CHM plus Hypoglycemic agents vs. Hypoglycemic agentsRisk with [Hypoglycemic drugs]Risk difference with [CHM plus hypoglycemic drugs]
Fasting blood glucose (FBG)
Treatment duration: mean 8.85 weeks
4,375
(48 RCTs)
⨁⨁⨁◯
MODERATEa
The mean fasting blood glucose was 7.43 mmol/LMD 0.93 mmol/L lower
(1.1 lower to 0.76 lower)
2-hour Postprandial blood glucose (2hPG)
Treatment duration: mean 8.79 weeks
4,004
(43 RCTs)
⨁⨁⨁◯
MODERATEa
The mean postprandial blood glucose was 10.44 mmol/LMD 1.46 mmol/L lower
(1.73 lower to 1.2 lower)
Glycosylated Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c)
Treatment duration: mean 9.32 weeks
3,009
(35 RCTs)
⨁⨁◯◯
LOW a,b
The mean glycosylated Hemoglobin A1c was 7.44%MD 0.84% lower
(1.05 lower to 0.64 lower)
Triglyceride (TG)
Treatment duration: mean 9.04 weeks
2,582
(24 RCTs)
⨁⨁◯◯
LOW a,b
The mean triglyceride was 2.41 mmol/LMD 0.4 mmol/L lower
(0.51 lower to 0.29 lower)
Cholesterol (TC)
Treatment duration: mean 9.04 weeks
2,582
(24 RCTs)
⨁⨁⨁◯
MODERATEa
The mean cholesterol was 5.15 mmol/LMD 0.4 mmol/L lower
(0.58 lower to 0.22 lower)
Fasting insulin (FINS)
Follow-up: range 1 to 30 weeks
Treatment duration: mean 10.67 weeks
1,049
(12 RCTs)
⨁⨁◯◯
LOW a,b
The mean fasting insulin was 15.11 μU/mlMD 1.03 μU/ml lower
(2.35 lower to 0.29 higher)
CHM plus lifestyle intervention vs. lifestyle interventionRisk with [lifestyle intervention]Risk difference with [CHM]
Fasting blood glucose (changed from baseline)(FBG)
Treatment duration 4 weeks
72
(one RCT)
⨁⨁⨁◯
MODERATEc
The mean fasting blood glucose (changed from baseline) was −0.32 mmol/LMD 0.62 mmol/L lower
(1.28 lower to 0.04 higher)
2-hour Postprandial blood glucose(changed from baseline)(2hPG)
Treatment duration 4 weeks
72
(one RCT)
⨁⨁⨁◯
MODERATEc
The mean postprandial Blood Glucose(changed from baseline) was −0.77 mmol/LMD 2.14 mmol/L lower
(2.81 lower to 1.47 lower)
CHM diet therapy plus lifestyle intervention vs. lifestyle interventionRisk with [lifestyle intervention]Risk difference with [CHM]
Fasting blood glucose (changed from baseline)(FBG)
Treatment duration 12 weeks
90
(one RCT)
⨁⨁⨁◯
MODERATEc
The mean fasting blood glucose (changed from baseline) was −0.87 mmol/LMD 1.08 mmol/L lower
(1.86 lower to 0.30 lower)
2-hour Postprandial blood glucose(changed from baseline)(2hPG)
Treatment duration 12 weeks
90
(one RCT)
⨁⨁⨁◯
MODERATEc
The mean postprandial Blood Glucose(changed from baseline) was −1.34 mmol/LMD 1.23 mmol/L lower
(1.96 lower to 0.50 lower)
Triglyceride(changed from baseline)(TG)
Treatment duration 12 weeks
90
(one RCT)
⨁⨁⨁◯
MODERATEc
The mean triglyceride(changed from baseline) was −0.41 mmol/LMD 0.3 mmol/L lower
(0.69 lower to 0.09 higher)
Cholesterol(changed from baseline)(TC)
Treatment duration 12 weeks
90
(one RCT)
⨁⨁⨁◯
MODERATEc
The mean cholesterol(changed from baseline) was −0.45 mmol/LMD 0.66 mmol/L lower
(1.1 lower to 0.23 lower)

GRADE: Quality of the evidence of Shanyao formulae for T2DM.

*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).

CHM, Chinese herbal medicine; CI, Confidence interval; GRADE, Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation; MD, Mean difference; RCTs, randomized controlled trials;

Explanations

aHigh statistical heterogeneity, p < 0.05; bFunnel plot not symmetrical; cSmall sample size.

Bold values is used to highlight.

Experiment Research Evidence of Shanyao for Diabetes

The major component groups of Shanyao are saponins, phenolic compounds, sterols, and mucilage (8). Identified active ingredients of Shanyao include polysaccharides, flavonoids, allantoin, choline, dioscin, and so on (914). Shanyao has shown immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory effects (78, 79). Hpyoglycemic effects of Shanyao as food and pharmacological effects in relation to T2DM are reviewed below.

Nutritional Study on the Hypoglycemic Effect of Shanyao

Shanyao has been studied to explore its effect on blood glucose as a food. A study indicated that meal A (maize flour meal) was composed of 81% carbohydrate, 3% protein, and 11% fat; meal B (cassava flour meal) was composed of 76% carbohydrate, 3% protein, and 15% fat; while meal C (yam flour meal) was composed of 85% carbohydrate, 2% protein, and 8% fat. Analysis of the results demonstrated a better glycemic response with meals A and C compared with meal B; Shanyao as food may bring more benefits to blood glucose (80).

Shanyao’s glycemic index has also been investigated. Glycemic index was introduced to rank how slowly or quickly carbohydrate containing foods are digested and increase postprandial blood glucose (24). A study has shown that the actual calorie input may be much lower in Shanyao than in brown rice and white bread, showing that the glycemic value of Shanyao is lower than brown rice (81), which is beneficial for controlling postprandial blood glucose, in turn may benefit diabetic patients.

An experimental research conducted in Brazil showed that Shanyao flour alleviated the consequences of the experimental diabetic disease. It showed that Shanyao flour could control the rise in blood glucose levels in diabetic rats and significantly greater radiodensity of femoral head when compared to DM group, suggesting protection in oxidative agents and postpone bone damage caused by diabetes (82).

Different Shanyao species are present depending on place of production. Dioscorea alata is known to have the highest yields among the Shanyao species with tubers. Dioscorea alata has shown to have higher amylose and total dietary fiber contents, resulting in slower absorption rates and can be particularly useful in diets for diabetics (83).

Pharmacological Effects in Relation to Diabetes of Shanyao and Its Compounds

The pharmacological effects and preventative effects for T2DM of Shanyao or its compounds have been tested in various animal models.

As we mentioned earlier on, a popular formula used for DM is Liu wei di huang wan made up of six herbs including Shanyao. In fructose-rich chow fed rats, after feeding of Liu wei di huang wan at 26 mg/kg for 60 min, reduction in plasma glucose was observed (84). When Shanyao was removed from the mixture, plasma glucose was not modified while this action was not modified by the removal of the other five herbs, indicating important hypoglycemic roles of Shanyao (84). Further, Shanyao produced similar hypoglycemic effects of the Liu wei di huang wan formula, while other herbs in the formula failed to produce the same effects. The authors also investigated the role of Shanyao in improving insulin sensitivity and found that oral administration of Shanyao at 4.2 mg/kg three times daily into streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats increased the response to exogenous insulin (84).

In vehicle-controlled mice and in alloxan-induced diabetic mice, Shanyao decoction concentrate at 300 mg and 600 mg/kg for 10 consecutive days can significantly reduce blood glucose level (85). Further, Shanyao has shown preventative effects on induced blood glucose elevation due to different causes including adrenaline, alloxan, and glucose feeding (85). As for hypoglycemic effects, Shan yao can reduce total cholesterol and triglyceride levels in diabetic rats, showing lipid lowering effects (86).

Polysaccharides

In alloxan-induced diabetic rats and mice, high dose DOTP-80 water-soluble polysaccharide (400 mg/kg) had strong hypoglycemic activity (87). Moreover, water-soluble polysaccharide could increase the level of antioxidant enzyme (superoxide dismutase) activity in alloxan-induced diabetic mice and stimulated an increase in glucose disposal in diabetic rats (87).

In high fat fed streptozotocin-induced type 2 diabetic rats, Shanyao polysaccharide administration significantly reduced fasting plasma glucose levels, increased serum insulin levels, and decreased glucagon levels, showing hypoglycemic effects (88, 89). The hypoglycemic effects of Shanyao polysaccharides are comparable to metformin (88, 89).

In vitro testing of Shanyao polysaccharide (YP-1) from a variety of Chinese yam revealed that YP-1 could stimulate ConA-induced T lymphocyte proliferation, and its branches are extremely important for the expression of the enhancement of the immunological activity (90). Considering the important role of the immune system in the progression of T2DM, YP-1 could play a part in enhancing immunological activities in T2DM.

Shanyao polysaccharides have shown antioxidant activities. Purified Shanyao polysaccharide could scavenge hydroxyl radical and superoxide radical. Additionally, it displayed inhibitory activity against E. coli, with a minimal inhibitory concentration of 2.5 mg/ml (91).

Dexamethasone-induced insulin resistance glucose/lipid metabolism diabetic mice model was established to evaluate the hypoglycemic effect of different concentrations of HuaiShanyao and different molecular weights of polysaccharide HSY-I, HSY-II, and HSY-III. The results indicated that the Chinese yam polysaccharide mixture had hypoglycemic effect (92).

Saponins and Flavones

The metabolic syndrome is a term for cluster of multiple metabolic risk criteria which is positively correlated with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Shanyao dioscorin interventions exhibit improved metabolic syndrome activities in obese rats, and peptic hydrolysates of Shanyao dioscorin in vitro exhibit DPP IV inhibitory activities (93).

After intragastric administration of dioscoreae flavone in diabetic mice, it was found that blood glucose of diabetic mice was decreased, the amount of drinking water decreased, and the weight of mice recovered (94). Further experiments showed that dioscoreae flavone could inhibit α-glucosidase activity, effectively reduce superoxide dismutase activity and malondialdehyde content in diabetic mice, and have antioxidant effect (94).

Experimental results show that the saponins and flavones of Shanyao had a marked inhibition effect on α-amylase. The kinetic analysis indicates that the inhibition type of saponins and flavones on α-amylase was competitive, and the enzyme-substrate apparent dissociation constant (Km′) of acarbose (the control), saponins, and flavones is 118.86, 79.23, 49.51 mg/ml, respectively (95).

Allantoin

Allantoin is known as the active principle richly contained in Shanyao (Dioscorea spp.). It is identified as an abundant and active component in Shanyao (Dioscorea spp.) (96). Allantoin may improve glucose utilization in the skeletal muscle through β-endorphin dependent- and independent-pathways that decrease plasma glucose in STZ-diabetic rats (97).

Allantoin can increase β-endorphin release through activation of I-2A receptors to lower blood glucose. Also, allantoin can activate I-2B receptors in the skeletal muscle or adipose tissues and brain and others to reduce blood glucose in STZ-diabetic rats. Both actions of allantoin may assist the increase of insulin sensitivity in diabetic rats (98).

Ligands

α-Glucosidase inhibitors are widely used in the treatment of patients with T2DM, which delay the absorption of carbohydrates from the small intestine and result in lowered postprandial blood glucose and insulin levels (99). Two ligands identified as 2,4-dimethoxy-6,7-dihydroxyphenanthrene and batatasin I were extracted from Shanyao using α-glucosidase functionalized magnetic nanoparticles as a solid phase extraction absorbent. Their α-glucosidase inhibitory activities were significantly higher than acarbose (100).

Discussion

Summary of Evidence

In this study, we searched clinical studies and experimental studies to present an overall picture of the evidence for Shanyao and its formulae for additional benefits to conventional therapies in the management of DM. We also explored the possible mechanisms of actions for Shanyao.

This study presents a comprehensive and up-to-date evidence for the treatment of T2DM with Shanyao formulae. A systematic review of 53 randomized controlled trials was identified in English- and Chinese-language databases, and meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the additive benefits and safety of Shanyao formulae. Systematic evaluation of modern literatures suggested that in terms of controlling blood glucose, blood lipid and improving insulin resistance, traditional Chinese medicine formulae containing Shanyao combined with conventional therapies do show added benefits when compared to hypoglycemic agents and lifestyle intervention alone.

Systematic review of clinical studies indicates that Shanyao-containing herbal formulae can improve important outcome measures for T2DM including FBG, 2hPG, HbA1c, TG, TC, and IR in people with T2DM. Further, the adverse events in the herbal formula group are lower than in the control group, suggesting a good safety profile. Taken together, Chinese herbal medicine therapy including Shanyao can be of beneficial for patients with T2DM. The heterogeneity in our meta-analysis was high. We performed a subgroup analysis based on pre-set conditions, but the results of subgroup analysis did not fully explain the source of heterogeneity. Considering different herb usages in different clinical trials, this could be a possible source of heterogeneity in the meta-analysis. Therefore, it is necessary to interpret these results with caution.

The occurrence of DM in the current day and age is closely related to lifestyle change. We found that Shanyao 山药, Fuling 茯苓, Maimendong麦门冬, Shanzhuyu 山茱萸, Haungqi 黄芪, Shengdihuang 生地黄, Gegen 葛根, Danshen 丹参, Tianhuafen 天花粉, and Huanglian 黄连are used more in modern literatures. The use of Chinese herbs that taste sweet and bitter, has the effect of invigorating qi and nourishing yin, infiltrating dampness and solidifying astringency, clearing heat, generating body fluid, and detoxifying. In recent years, the prevalence of diabetes in obese and overweight people has doubled in modern China (6). TCM believes that phlegm-dampness is the basic cause of obesity. An ancient practitioner Zhu Danxi clearly put forward in “Dan Xi Zhi Fa Xin Yao丹溪治法心要” that “people who are obese have excessive dampness and phlegm in the body”. Obesity combined with diabetes is characterized by yin deficiency, internal heat, and phlegm dampness. Therefore, modern diabetes treatment focuses on nourishing yin and clearing heat, drying dampness and resolving phlegm.

To sum up the experimental evidence, Shanyao as a food, is rich in dietary fiber with low glycemic index, which is beneficial to improving postprandial blood glucose of diabetic patients. In diabetic animals, Shanyao can reduce blood sugar, regulate blood lipid, resist oxidation and be beneficial to the bone. The main active ingredients of Shanyao can regulate blood glucose by improving insulin resistance, inhibiting α-glucosidase activity, delaying the absorption of glucose in intestine, inhibiting DPP-IV activity, increasing the concentration of endogenous GLP-1, antioxidation and regulating immunity.

Limitations of the Current Review

The included clinical studies also present methodological shortfalls. In randomized clinical trials, appropriate randomization and allocation concealment methods can reduce bias, but only 25.81% of the included studies described the randomization methods, and only 2.58% of the studies described allocation concealment. Inappropriate randomization and allocation concealment may exaggerate the efficacy. Inadequate blinding method can also lead to overestimation of the effect. Chinese herbal medicine has many obstacles to the implementation of blinding in clinical trials due to the herbal preparation and odor; it is easy for participants to identify which group they are in. Active exploration of the preparation of placebo and the implementation of blinding method of traditional Chinese medicine may be a way to solve this problem. In addition, the included studies did not publish study protocols, and the non-standardization of clinical research reports is not helpful to the dissemination and recognition of research results.

Modern literature systematic reviews included the study of traditional Chinese medicine formulae containing Shanyao. The included studies all used Shanyao as part of a traditional Chinese medicine formula for T2DM. Therefore, the results of modern literature analysis do not fully represent the role of Shanyao in the treatment of T2DM in reducing blood sugar, lipid and improving IR.

Implications in Research and Clinical Practice

Future clinical studies should be recommended to design and report data following the items required by the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) (101) and its extensions for herbal medicine and traditional CM (102, 103).

Rigorous methodology is recommended when designing future clinical trials with correct methods of sequence generation and allocation concealment. Protocols should be published and be registered to minimize reporting bias and increase transparency in the reporting the results.

The included studies reported outcome measures directly related to blood glucose metabolism, lipid profiles, and β-cell function. As we know, T2DM is a chronic and progressive disease, and those who are affected may have drastic lifestyle changes. Other clinically important outcomes such as quality of life would provide another aspect of understanding the effect of CM therapies for T2DM.

As we all know, T2DM is a progressive and lifelong disease. The included clinical studies had treatments between 2 and 24 weeks with only few studies reporting on follow-up data. Future studies may consider using longer treatment durations and lengthy follow-up period to reflect clinical practice and provide evidence for the long-term effects of CM treatments using Shanyao.

Although we present in the study available experimental evidence for Shanyao, the volume of studies is small compared to other commonly used herbs such as ginseng. More experimental study data will improve the understanding of mechanisms of action of hypoglycemic effects of Shanyao. Results may provide future directions for the development of new and improved hypoglycemic agents.

Based on clinical studies, herbs that are commonly used with Shanyao in the modern context include huangqi 黄芪, shengdihuang 生地黄, gegen 葛根, tianhuafen 天花粉, danshen 丹参, fuling 茯苓, maimendong 麦门冬, shanzhuyu 山茱萸, and huanglian 黄连.

Finally, this study provides comprehensive information about Shanyao’s use for T2DM in clinical studies. At the same time, it explores possible mechanisms through experimental studies, providing evidence of hypoglycemic mechanism of Shanyao at a cellular and animal model levels.

Funding

The China–Australia International Research Centre for Chinese Medicine (CAIRCCM)—a joint initiative of RMIT University, Australia and the Guangdong Provincial Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, China supported this research. We also received funding from the Ministry of Science & Technology of China (grant number 2015BAI04B00) and Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine (grant numbers 2018DB03).

Statements

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Author contributions

All authors listed have made a substantial, direct, and intellectual contribution to the work and approved it for publication.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  • 1

    Federation. ID. IDF Diabetes Atlas. 9th edn.Belgium (2019). Available at: https://www.diabetesatlas.org. [cited 2020 March 23rd].

  • 2

    AssociationAD. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2020. Diabetes Care (2020) 43:s14–31. doi: 10.2337/dc20-S002

  • 3

    WangLGaoPZhangMHuangZZhangDDengQet al. Prevalence and Ethnic Pattern of Diabetes and Prediabetes in China in 2013. Jama (2017) 317:2515–23. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.7596

  • 4

    PanXRLiGWHuYHWangJXYangWYAnZXet al. Effects of Diet and Exercise in Preventing NIDDM in People With Impaired Glucose Tolerance: The Da Qing Igt and Diabetes Study. Diabetes Care (1997) 20:537–44. doi: 10.2337/diacare.20.4.537

  • 5

    StrattonIMAdlerAINeilHAMatthewsDRManleySECullCAet al. Association of glycaemia with macrovascular andmicrovascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35):prospective observational study. BMJ (2000) 321:405–12. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7258.405

  • 6

    Chinese Diabetes Society. version) [Article in Chinese]. Chin J Diabetes (2018) 10:450. doi: CNKI:SUN:SYNK.0.2018-04-009

  • 7

    ShiY. Internal medicine of traditional Chinese medicine (Textbook for the 13th five year plan of general higher education, textbook for the plan of national higher medical institutions). Beijing, China: Science Press (2017).

  • 8

    BenskyDClaveySStogerE. Chinese herbal medicine Materia Medica. 3rd ed.Seattle, US: Eastland Press, Inc (2004).

  • 9

    YangMHChinYWYoonKDKimJ. Phenolic compounds with pancreatic lipase inhibitory activity from Korean yam (Dioscorea opposita). J Enzyme Inhibition Med Chem (2014) 29:16. doi: 10.3109/14756366.2012.742517

  • 10

    YangMHYoonKDChinYWParkJHKimJ. Phenolic compounds with radical scavenging and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitory activities from Dioscorea opposita. Bioorg Med Chem (2009) 17:2689–94. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2009.02.057

  • 11

    KongXFZhangYZYinYLWuGYZhouHJTanZLet al. Chinese yam polysaccharide enhances growth performance and cellular immune response in weanling rats. J Sci Food Agricult (2009) 89:2039–44. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.3688

  • 12

    JeonJRLeeJSLeeCHKimJYKimSDNamDH. Effect of Ethanol Extract of Dried Chinese Yam (Dioscorea batatas) Flour Containing Dioscin on Gastrointestinal Function in Rat Model. Arch Pharm Res (2006) 29:348–53. doi: 10.1007/bf02968583

  • 13

    FuYCFerngLHHuangPY. Quantitative analysis of allantoin and allantoic acid in yam tuber, mucilage, skin and bulbil of the Dioscorea species. Food Chem (2006) 94:541–9. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.12.006

  • 14

    FuYCChenSHHuangPYLiYJ. Application of Bubble Separation for Quantitative Analysis of Choline in Dioscorea (Yam) Tubers. J Agric Food Chem (2005) 53:2392–6. doi: 10.1021/jf048501h

  • 15

    GreenJ. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions(Version 5.1.0). UK: The Cochrane Collaboration (2011). March.

  • 16

    World Health Organisation. Definition, Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus and its Complications, Part 1: Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. Geneva (1999).

  • 17

    Chinese Diabetes Society. Prevention and Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in China (2010 version). Beijing China: Beijing University Publisher (2011).

  • 18

    Chinese Diabetes Society. Prevention and Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in China (2013 version). Chin J Diabetes (2014) 6:447–98. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1000-6699.2014.10.020

  • 19

    ZhouZY. Internal medicine of traditional Chinese medicine / national planning textbook for “12th Five Year Plan”, “11th Five Year Plan” and “15th five year plan” of Higher Education. Beijing, China: China Press of Traditional Chinese Medicine (2007).

  • 20

    ZhangBY. Internal medicine of traditional Chinese medicine / teaching materials of medical colleges and Universities. Shanghai, Chian: Shanghai Science and Technology Press (1985).

  • 21

    ZhangBL. Internal medicine of traditional Chinese medicine / textbook for the 13th five year plan of higher education in the industry of traditional Chinese Medicine. Beijing, China: China Press of Traditional Chinese Medicine (2017).

  • 22

    FanGJ. Series on clinical diagnosis and treatment of specialist diseases in traditional Chinese Medicine - clinical diagnosis and treatment of specialist diseases in endocrinology and rheumatism in traditional Chinese medicine. 2nd Edition. Beijing, China: People’s Medical Publishing House (2013).

  • 23

    WuMH. Internal medicine of traditional Chinese medicine / textbook for the 12th Five Year Plan of higher education in the industry of traditional Chinese Medicine. Beijing, China: China Press of Traditional Chinese Medicine (2012).

  • 24

    WoleverTM. The glycemic index. World Rev Nutr Diet (1990) 62:120–85. doi: 10.1007/s11883-007-0064-x

  • 25

    LiWT. The effect of Dioscorea porridge on blood sugar and blood lipid in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Master dissertation. Fuzhou: Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (2016).

  • 26

    ZhangLY. Clinical Observation on the Treatment of Damp-heat Syndrome in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus by Clearing Heat and Removing Dampness. Master dissertation. Beijing: Beijing University of Chinese Medicine (2016).

  • 27

    WangGMWangZG. Clinical Study on the Treatment of Insulin Resistance in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with the Method of Benefiting Kidney and Strengthening Spleen [Article in Chinese]. Gansu J TCM (2009) 22:25–6. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-6852.2009.04.016

  • 28

    WuZ. Study on Jianpi Jiangtang Decoction in the Treatment of Spleen Deficiency and Phlegm Stasis Syndrome of Diabetes Mellitus. Master dissertation. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (2005).

  • 29

    LiuY. Huang Qi Tang in type 2 diabetes Qi and Yin Deficiency and Blood Stasis Syndrome Clinical Study. Master dissertation. Xianyang: ShanXi University Of Chinese Medicine (2010).

  • 30

    ChenY. The Clinic research of treating Type 2 Diabetes by thetherapy of nourishing spleen and kidneys,heat-clearing and yin –nourishing. Master dissertation. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (2012).

  • 31

    ZhangXX. Clinical Observation and Mechanism Study on the Effect of Shenqi Compound and Insulin on Cell Function, Oxidative Stress and Blood Level in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus. Master dissertation. Chengdu: Chengdu University of Chinese Medicine (2013).

  • 32

    LiXL. Clinical studies on insulin from the intestine to explore the mechanism of Spleen Qi Treatment of type 2 diabetes. Master dissertation. Jinan: Shandong University Of Chinese Medicine (2014).

  • 33

    WangSL. The early Protective effect on β-cell function in Type 2 diabetes with the therapy of nourishing yin and clearing away heat. Master dissertation. Guangzhou: Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine (2010).

  • 34

    ZhangN. Clinical Study on Invigorating Qi and Nourishing Yin Therapy for Insulin Resistance in Initial Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Master dissertation. Taian: Tianshan Medical University (2013).

  • 35

    LvPChenLBiNN. Clinical Study on Yuye Decoction in Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes with Qi and Yin Deficiency Syndrome [Article in Chinese]. China J Chin Med (2018) 33:1244–7. doi: 10.16368/j.issn.1674-8999.2018.07.294

  • 36

    PengYZXuY. Clinical efficacy of the Shenmai Jiangtang tablet on senile patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus of Qiyin Liangxu [Article in Chinese]. Clin Res Tradit Chin Med (2018) 10:67–9. doi: CNKI:SUN:ZYLY.0.2018-06-031

  • 37

    WangML. Clinical Observation of tang yi prescription on Improving Symptom of Diabetes mellitus Patients. Master dissertation.Guangzhou: Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine (2012). p. 1524.

  • 38

    ZhangLL. Clinical Observation of Yiqi Yangyin Jiangtang Decoction in the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Master dissertation. Beijing: Beijing University of Chinese Medicine (2015).

  • 39

    YangLF. Clinical Study of Qianjin Wenwu Decoction Combined with Metformin in the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes in Taiyin People. Master dissertation. Yanji: Yanbian University (2017).

  • 40

    LinJC. Observation on the curative effect of traditional Chinese medicine combined with Baduanjin on type 2 diabetes mellitus. Master dissertation. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (2011).

  • 41

    ZhangJ. Clinical Observation and Gastrointestinal Hormone Study on Diabetic Spleen Deficiency Syndrome Treated by Jianpi Yiqi Method. Master dissertation. Jinan: Shangdong University of Chinese Medicine (2012).

  • 42

    BaiHM. 40 Cases of Type 2 Diabetes Treated with Yiqi Yangyin Huoxue Decoction [Article in Chinese]. Shanxi Tradit Chin Med (2006) 27:1237–328. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7369.2006.10.053

  • 43

    WangHQ. The Clinical Research of combination of sweet and bitter herbs for the yin dificiency and heat accumulation of Type 2 diabetes millitus. Master dissertation. Jinan: Shandong University Of Chinese Medicine (2016).

  • 44

    ZhangXXLiuYXiongDQXieCG. Insulin combined with Chinese medicine improves glycemic outcome through multiple pathways in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Diabetes Investigation (2015) 6:708–15. doi: 10.1111/jdi.12352

  • 45

    ZhuLBLiJ. Effect of Jiangtangjing Granule on Prethrombotic State in Elderly Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [Article in Chinese]. J Gansu Coll Tradit Chin Med (2013) 30:31–4. doi: CNKI:SUN:GSZX.0.2013-05-016

  • 46

    ZhuLYWuZWChengZJ. Clinical Curative Effect of self-made Herbal Medicine combined with western medicine on diabetes [Article in Chinese]. Liaoning J Tradit Chin Med (2015) 42:561–3. doi: 10.13192/j.issn.1000-1719.2015.03.048

  • 47

    ZhouYHZhongZYDengLHPenNXShenQS. Effect of Erban Decoction on the Blood Sugar of Senile patients with type 2 diabetes [Article in Chinese]. J New Chin Med (2014) 46:90. doi: 10.13457/j.cnki.jncm.2014.10.037

  • 48

    ZhouJYShenW. Clinical Observation of Shenqi Ningxiao Decoction in the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [Article in Chinese]. J Clin Chin Med (2009) 21:204–5. doi: 10.16448/j.cjtcm.2009.03.007

  • 49

    ZhouJJDongYY. Clinical Study of Yiqi Yangyin Capsule in the Treatment of Diabetes Mellitus (Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus) with Deficiency of Qi and Yin [Article in Chinese]. Drugs Clin (2012) 8:252–3.

  • 50

    ZhouDQFengPWanP. Clinical Observation on 50 Cases of Type 2 Diabetes Treated with Jiangtang Mixture [Article in Chinese]. Zhejiang J Tradit Chin Med (2008) 43:431. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0411-8421.2008.07.047

  • 51

    ZhaoFJSongJ. Clinical Study on the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with the Method of Supplementing Qi and Nourishing Yin [Article in Chinese]. J Heze Med College (2009) 21:3941. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-4118.2009.01.019

  • 52

    ZhangFBTaoYNingJ. Observation on the efficacy of no-named Chinese herbal Formula in the adjuvant treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus [Article in Chinese]. Chin Tradit Med Sci Technol (2015) 22:186–7. doi: CNKI:SUN:TJYY.0.2015-02-034

  • 53

    ZhangYLZhangJXieFM. Combined Chinese and Western Medicine for 98 Cases of Secondary Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Irresponsive Sulfonylurea Drugs [Article in Chinese]. Shanghai J Tradit Chin Med (2004) 38:18–9. doi: CNKI:SUN:SHZZ.0.2004-07-007

  • 54

    ZhangHXChangFYZhangBRDengGXYuYXZhangGL. Clinical Observation on 109 Cases of Insulin Resistance in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Treated with Xiaotangping Capsule [Article in Chinese]. J Tradit Chin Med (2007) 48:812–3. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-1668.2007.09.016

  • 55

    ZhangWJYangHJZhangZJZhangZXWuLLChenM. Effect of Qilian Xiaoke Formula on Diabetes Insulin Resistance and Related Inflammatory Factors [Article in Chinese]. Hunan J Tradit Chin Med (2011) 27:46. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-7705.2011.01.002

  • 56

    ZhangHHPanBY. Clinical Observation on 120 Cases of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Deficiency of both Qi and Yin and Blood Stasis Treated by Combination of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Western Medicine [Article in Chinese]. Beijing J Tradit Chin Med (2009) 28:538–40. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2619.2009.06.011

  • 57

    ZhangGQYouQLvMChenDL. 36 Cases of Type 2 Diabetes Treated with Yiqi Yangyin Huoxue Decoction [Article in Chinese]. New World Diabetes (2014) 11:35–6. doi: CNKI:SUN:TNBX.0.2014-22-031

  • 58

    ZhangGZSunQFGuoJFHuangBTLiSHWangFHet al. Clinical study on the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus with integrated traditional Chinese and Western Medicine [Article in Chinese]. Modern J Integrated Tradit Chin Western Med (2002) 11:57. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-8849.2002.01.003

  • 59

    ZhangBNanZXuCMLiuGPGuoXTYangLY. et al. Clinical Observation on 30 Cases of Type 2 Diabetes Treated by Combination of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Western Medicine [Article in Chinese]. Hunan J Tradit Chin Med (2017) 33:13–5. doi: 10.16808/j.cnki.issn1003-7705.2017.08.005

  • 60

    YuCBYanDBZhangMZChenYWangY. Clinical Observation of Self-made Taiping Tangke Concentrated Pill in the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [Article in Chinese]. Pract Clin Appl Integrated Tradit Chin Western Med (2013) 13:16–7. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-4040.2013.01.010

  • 61

    YuZLZhouZKQuanFL. Clinical Observation on 30 Cases of Type 2 Diabetes Treated by Combination of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Western Medicine [Article in Chinese]. Modern J Integrated Tradit Chin Western Med (2004) 13:186. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-8849.2004.02.037

  • 62

    XuXJLiuDZhangWWangJ. Study of the effect of add itive Shenling Baizhu san decoction to insulin sensitivity index of patients with type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [Article in Chinese]. Clin J Tradit Chin Med (2015) 27:954–6. doi: 10.16448/j.cjtcm.2015.0360

  • 63

    XieMHLuCM. Observation on the therapeutic effect of Dihuang Jiangtang Pill on type 2 diabetes mellitus [Article in Chinese]. Jilin J Tradit Chin Med (2007) 27:22–3. doi: 10.13463/j.cnki.jlzyy.2007.06.016

  • 64

    TangYLiJS. Research on Treating Syndrome of Endogenous Heat Due to Yin Deficiency Type 2 Diabetes Patients with Liuwei Dihuang Bolus Combined Metformin Hydrochloride Tablets [Article in Chinese]. J Huan Normal Univ (Med Sci) (2015) 12:2831. doi: CNKI:SUN:HNYG.0.2015-04-010

  • 65

    ShangJZhengJQSuXL. Effect of integrated traditional Chinese and Western Medicine on insulin resistance and islet beta cell function in type 2 diabetes mellitus [Article in Chinese]. Guangming J Tradit Chin Med (2014) 29:1197–200. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-8914.2014.06.038

  • 66

    PengMNWangHZZhengCF. Observation of the Effect of Using Ginseng and Astragalus Arbran Decoction with Western Medicine on the Type-2 Diabetes [Article in Chinese]. Int J Tradit Chin Med (2009) 31:241. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4246.2009.03.028

  • 67

    LvYHouJJLuYE. 45 Cases of Type 2 Diabetes Treated by the Method of Supplementing Qi, Nourishing Yin and Promoting Blood Circulation [Article in Chinese]. Shanxi Tradit Chin Med (2011) 32:1485–6. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7369.2011.11.030

  • 68

    LuoXLZhaoC. Clinical Observation on the Treatment of 52 Cases of DM II With ZhiboDihuang Decoction and Metform [Article in Chinese]. Guiding J TCM (2005) 11:15–7. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-951X.2005.06.008

  • 69

    LiuLLiuDLLiuHLZhaoHXQuXLiZYet al. On Treatment of 30 Cases of Type 2 Diabetes with Deficiency of Qi and Yin Deficiency Syndrome by Huoxue Jiangtang Potion [Article in Chinese]. Modern Tradit Chin Med (2017) 37:1620. doi: CNKI:SUN:XDZY.0.2017-05-007

  • 70

    LiuCGeHLiMLiSYYuanWZhangJ. Effect of Yiqi Yangyin Qingre Formula on serum levels of blood lipids, blood gluose and 1,2 5- dihydroxyvitamin D3 in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus [Article in Chinese]. Chin J Biochem Drugs (2016) 36:145–7. doi: CNKI:SUN:SHYW.0.2016-02-050

  • 71

    LiZHYangMTangD. Shen Li. Clinical Observation of Jiangtang Capsule Combined with Western Medicine in Treating 102 Cases of Type 2 Diabetes with Deficiency of Qi and Yin [Article in Chinese]. Guiding J TCM Pharmacy (2011) 17:34–6. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-951X.2011.02.016

  • 72

    HouYH. Clinical Study of Treating Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with the Method of Smoothing the Liver and Strengthening The Spleen. Master dissertation. Jinan: Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (2011).

  • 73

    GaoLChenYYHuoGSWanYX. Clinical efficacy of metformin combined with Shenqi Jiangtang Capsule in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus and its influence on blood sugar, lipid and inflammatory factors [Article in Chinese]. Chin J Clin Rational Drug Use (2017) 10:13. doi: 10.15887/j.cnki.13-1389/r.2017.36.001

  • 74

    FanYLHuangXJGaoJNChenHW. Clinical Observation of Shenqi Jiangtang Granule in the Assistant Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [Article in Chinese]. Chin J Med Equipment (2014) 11:142. doi: CNKI:SUN:YXZB.0.2014-S1-170

  • 75

    CuiJHLuoHX. Observation on curative effect of 40 cases of type 2 diabetes mellitus treated by integrated traditional Chinese and Western Medicine [Article in Chinese]. Yunnan J Tradit Chin Med (2006) 27:45. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2349.2006.04.003

  • 76

    CaoYZouBY. Clinical Observation on Treating 54 Cases of Type 2 Diabetes with Modified Baihurensheng Decoction and Western Medicine [Article in Chinese]. Guiding J TCM (2007) 13:1820. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-951X.2007.11.009

  • 77

    CaoAMZhangGJZhengJDanYL. Clinical Observation on 68 Cases of Type 2 Diabetes Treated with Wuhuang Tongmai Decoction [Article in Chinese]. Beijing J Tradit Chin Med (2008) 27:957–8. doi: 10.16025/j.1674-1307.2008.12.006

  • 78

    KimSShinSHyunBKongHHanSLeeAet al. Immunomodulatory Effects of Dioscoreae Rhizome Against Inflammation through Suppressed Production of Cytokines Via Inhibition of the NF-kappaB Pathway. Immune Netw (2012) 12:181–8. doi: 10.4110/in.2012.12.5.181

  • 79

    LeeSCTsaiCCChenJCLinCCHuMLLuS. The evaluation of reno- and hepatoprotective effects of huai-shan-yao (Rhizome Dioscoreae). Am J Chin Med (2002) 30:609–16. doi: 10.1142/S0192415X02000624

  • 80

    Bakare-OdunolaMTMustaphaAAbdu AguyeI. Effect of Nigerian meals on the Pharmacokinetics of chlorpropamide in type II diabetic patients. Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet (2008) 33:31–5. doi: 10.1007/BF03191016

  • 81

    LinMHWuMCLuSLinJ. Glycemic index, glycemic load and insulinemic index of Chinese starchy foods. World J Gastroenterol (2010) 16:4973–9. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i39.4973

  • 82

    Rego TdeSAsh LdaSPessoaLFeijoMBLeiteJdos Santos AdeSet al. The intake of yam (Dioscorea bulbifera Linn) attenuated the hyperglycemia and the bone fragility in female diabetic rats. Nutricion Hospitalaria (2014) 29:370–5. doi: 10.3305/nh.2014.29.2.7046

  • 83

    Faustina DufieWMOduroIEllisWOAsieduRMaziya-DixonB. Potential health benefits of water yam (Dioscorea alata). Food Funct (2013) 4:1496–501. doi: 10.1039/c3fo60064e

  • 84

    HsuJHWuYCLiuIMChengJT. Dioscorea as the principal herb of Die-Huang-Wan, a widely used herbal mixture in China, for improvement of insulin resistance in fructose-rich chow-fed rats. J Ethnopharmacol (2007) 112:577–84. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2007.05.013

  • 85

    HaoZQHangBQWangY. Effect of Shan Yao decoction on reducing blood glucose levels in diabetic mice [Article in Chinese]. J China Pharm Univ (1991) 22:158–60. doi: CNKI:SUN:ZGYD.0.1991-03-014

  • 86

    HangYY. Pharmacological experiments on lowing the blood sugar and blood lipids level of Rhizoma Dioscoreae [Article in Chinese]. J Plant Resour Environment (1994) 3:5960. doi: CNKI:SUN:ZWZY.0.1994-04-012

  • 87

    FanYJHeQYLuoASWangMYLuoAX. Characterization and antihyperglycemic activity of a polysaccharide from Dioscorea opposita Thunb roots. Int J Mol Sci (2015) 16:6391–401. doi: 10.3390/ijms16036391

  • 88

    LvJWeiPFBaiF. Effect of Chinese yam polysaccharide on platelet and enzyme activity in type 2 diabetic rats [Article in Chinese]. Chin J Gerontol (2017) 37:3186–7. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-9202.2017.13.027

  • 89

    YangHLZhangHXLiLHWangYZhangWWJiangX. Study of the hypoglycemic mechanism of Chinese yam polysaccharide in type 2 diabetic rats [Article in Chinese]. J Agricult Univ Hebei (2010) 33:100–3. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1573.2010.03.022

  • 90

    ZhaoGHKanJQLiZXChenZD. Structural features and immunological activity of a polysaccharide from Dioscorea opposita Thunb roots. Carbohydr Polym (2005) 61:125–31. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2005.04.020

  • 91

    YangWFWangYLiXPYuP. Purification and structural characterization of Chinese yam polysaccharide and its activities. Carbohydr Polym (2015) 117:1021–7. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.09.082

  • 92

    LiQLiWZGaoQYZouYX. Hypoglycemic Effect of Chinese Yam (Dioscorea opposita rhizoma) Polysaccharide in Different Structure and Molecular Weight. J Food Sci (2017) 82:2487–94. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.13919

  • 93

    ShihSLLinYSLinSYHouWC. Effects of yam dioscorin interventions on improvements of the metabolic syndrome in high-fat diet-induced obese rats. Bot Stud (2015) 56:4. doi: 10.1186/s40529-015-0084-8

  • 94

    HeF. Extraction Active components in dioscoreae rhizome and Research on hypoglycemic bioactive. Master dissertation. Chongqing: Southwestern University (2011).

  • 95

    QuSZhangLMZhangXBLiZJ. Inhibition of α-Amylase Activities by Extracts of Chinese Yam. In: Proceedings of the 2012 International Conference on Applied Biotechnology (ICAB 2012)SpringerLink (2014). p. 1499–506. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-37925-3_159

  • 96

    Kazahiko SagaraMO. Kejichi Suto, and Tsuguchika Yoshida. Quantitative Determination of Allantoin in Dioscorea Rhizome and an Oriental Pharmaceutical Preparation, Hachimi-Gan, by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography. Planta Med (1989) 55:93. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-961841

  • 97

    NiuCSChenWWuHTChengKCWenYJLinKCet al. Decrease of plasma glucose by allantoin, an active principle of yam (Dioscorea spp.), in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. J Agric Food Chem (2010) 58:12031–5. doi: 10.1021/jf103234d

  • 98

    LinKCYehLRChenLJWenYJChengKCChengJT. Plasma Glucose-lowering Action of Allantoin is Induced by Activation of Imidazoline I-2 Receptors in Streptozotocin-induced Diabetic Rats. Horm Metab Res (2012) 44:1446. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1295439

  • 99

    van de LaarFALucassenPLAkkermansRPvan de LisdonkEHRuttenGEvan WeelC. α-Glucosidase Inhibitors for Patients With Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes Care (2005) 28:154. doi: 10.2337/diacare.28.7.1840

  • 100

    ZhangSSWuDDLiHZhuJHHuWPLuMHet al. Rapid identification of alpha-glucosidase inhibitors from Dioscorea opposita Thunb peel extract by enzyme functionalized Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles coupled with HPLC-MS/MS. Food Funct (2017) 8:3219–27. doi: 10.1039/C7FO00928C

  • 101

    SchulzKFAltmanDGMoherD. CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Trials (2010) 11:32. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2011.09.004

  • 102

    BianZLiuBMoherDWuTLiYShangHet al. Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) for traditional Chinese medicine: current situation and future development. Front Med (2011) 5:171–7. doi: 10.1007/s11684-011-0132-z

  • 103

    GagnierJJBoonHRochonPMoherDBarnesJBombardierC. Reporting randomized, controlled trials of herbal interventions: an elaborated CONSORT statement. Ann Intern Med (2006) 144:364–7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-144-5-200603070-00013

Summary

Keywords

Dioscoreae rhizome, Shan yao, Chinese medicine, diabetes, systematic review, efficacy, safety, mechanism

Citation

Sun L, Di YM, Lu C, Guo X, Tang X, Zhang AL, Xue CC and Fan G (2020) Additional Benefit of Chinese Medicine Formulae Including Dioscoreae rhizome (Shanyao) for Diabetes Mellitus: Current State of Evidence. Front. Endocrinol. 11:553288. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2020.553288

Received

18 April 2020

Accepted

14 October 2020

Published

10 November 2020

Volume

11 - 2020

Edited by

Wenquan Zou, Case Western Reserve University, United States

Reviewed by

Aiping Lu, Tongji University, China; Guo-qing Zheng, The Second Affiliated Hospital & Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, China

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Charlie Changli Xue, ; Guanjie Fan,

†These authors have contributed equally to this work

This article was submitted to Clinical Diabetes, a section of the journal Frontiers in Endocrinology

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics