SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Endocrinol., 01 August 2022

Sec. Clinical Diabetes

Volume 13 - 2022 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.921159

Impact of preexisting diabetes mellitus on cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation: A meta-analysis

  • 1. Department of Oncology, Ganyu District People’s Hospital of Lianyungang City, Lianyungang, China

  • 2. Institute of Molecular Biology and Translational Medicine, The Affiliated People’s Hospital, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China

Abstract

Objective:

To determine the impact of preexisting diabetes mellitus on cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) by conducting a meta-analysis.

Methods:

PubMed and Embase databases were comprehensively searched for relevant studies publishing until May 19, 2022. Cohort studies or post-hoc analyses of clinical trials that investigated the association of diabetes mellitus with cardiovascular or all-cause mortality in AF patients were included.

Results:

A total of 21 studies with 526,136 AF patients were identified. The pooled prevalence of diabetes mellitus in patients with AF was 26%. The summary multivariable-adjusted risk ratio (RR) of all-cause mortality was 1.37 (95% confidence intervals [CIs] 1.23–1.53) for patients with diabetes versus those without diabetes. Moreover, diabetes mellitus was also associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular mortality (RR 1.46; 95% CI 1.34–1.58). Stratified analyses suggested that the impact of diabetes on all-cause and cardiovascular mortality was consistently observed in each named subgroup.

Conclusion:

The presence of diabetes mellitus in patients with AF is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality, even after adjustment for important confounding factors.

Introduction

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common type of heart rhythm disorder that can result in stroke, heart failure, myocardial infarction, and venous thromboembolism (). The healthcare burden of atrial fibrillation is increasing because of the accelerated aging of the population worldwide (). Despite direct-acting oral anticoagulants effectively reducing stroke risk (), atrial fibrillation was still associated with a 1.95-fold increased risk of all-cause mortality (). Therefore, risk stratification of survival outcomes in atrial fibrillation patients is an urgent demand for better clinical management.

Diabetes mellitus is a well-established risk factor for the development of atrial fibrillation. Patients with diabetes had approximately 28% higher risk of atrial fibrillation as compared with those without diabetes (). Diabetes mellitus is associated with an increased risk of mortality (). The presence of diabetes mellitus in atrial fibrillation patients may reinforce the risk of mortality. The effect of diabetes mellitus on adverse outcomes has been extensively investigated in atrial fibrillation patients (). However, conflicting results have been reported on the association of diabetes with all-cause or cardiovascular mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation (–).

No previous meta-analysis has evaluated the association of diabetes mellitus with survival outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation. To address these knowledge gaps, we performed this meta-analysis to determine the impact of diabetes mellitus on cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in atrial fibrillation patients.

Methods

Data source and literature search

We performed this meta-analysis according to the guideline of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses statement (). Two authors independently searched PubMed and Embase databases until May 19, 2022, using the following combined keywords: ‘atrial fibrillation’ AND ‘diabetes’ OR ‘diabetic’ AND ‘survival’ OR ‘death’ OR ‘mortality’ AND ‘follow-up’ OR ‘follow up’ (Supplementary Text S1). Moreover, we also searched the reference lists of pertinent articles for any missing articles.

Study selection

Inclusion criteria were as follows: 1) population: participants with a diagnosis of atrial fibrillation; 2) predictor: diabetes mellitus; 3) comparison: the presence of diabetes mellitus compared with those without diabetes; 4) outcomes: reported multivariable-adjusted relative risk of cardiovascular or all-cause mortality; and 5) study design: cohort studies or post-hoc analysis of clinical trials. For articles overlapping patients with another study, we only selected the article with the most complete data or the longest follow-up duration. The exclusion criteria included the following: 1) outcome measures were not of interest, 2) duplicate studies, and 3) an adjusted risk estimate was not available.

Data extraction and quality evaluation

Data extraction and quality evaluation were performed by two independent authors, and disagreements were resolved through discussion. Data collected from each study included the following: the first author’s name, publication year, country, design of the study, sample sizes, gender, mean median age of patients, anticoagulant therapy, the prevalence of diabetes mellitus, outcome measures, length of follow-up, fully adjusted risk summary for diabetes versus without diabetes, and variables adjusted. To evaluate the methodological quality of included studies, we adopted a 9-point Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) for the cohort studies (). A study with an overall score of 7 points or more was deemed high-quality.

Data analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using Stata 12.0 (Stata, College Station, TX, USA). The impact of diabetes mellitus on survival outcomes was summarized by pooling a fully adjusted risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for diabetes mellitus versus those without diabetes. Between studies, heterogeneity was explored using the I2 statistics and Cochrane Q test. A random-effects model was utilized when there was significant heterogeneity (I2 statistic >50% and/or p-value of Cochrane Q test <0.10); otherwise, we used a fixed-effects model. Publication bias was evaluated using Begg’s test, Egger’s test, and funnel plot. In case of publication bias, we run a trim-and-fill analysis to observe the impact of publication bias. Sensitivity analyses were performed by the exclusion of individual studies each time to recalculate the pooling risk summary. Subgroup analyses were conducted according to the study design, geographical region, type of atrial fibrillation, sample size, mean/median age of patients, and follow-up duration.

Results

Search results and study characteristics

Briefly, a total of 1,760 articles were identified in our initial literature search, of which 614 duplicates were removed, and 1,086 articles were further excluded after scanning the titles or abstracts. Sixty full-text articles were retrieved for detailed assessment. Finally, 21 studies (–, –) were included in the meta-analysis after applying the predefined criteria (Figure 1).

Figure 1

The main features of these eligible studies are summarized in Table 1. The included studies were published between 2011 and 2022. Three studies (, , ) were post-hoc analyses of randomized controlled trials, five studies (, , , , ) were retrospective designs, and others were prospective studies. Sample sizes ranged between 278 and 326,832, with 526,136 atrial fibrillation patients. The median/mean duration of follow-up ranged from 12 months to 6.3 years. Supplementary Table S1 describes the comorbidities and concomitant treatment of the included studies. Based on the criteria of the NOS, all the included studies were deemed to have high quality (Supplementary Table S2).

Table 1

Author/yearRegionStudy designPatients (% men)Age (years)Anticoagulant therapyPrevalence of diabetesOutcomes
Relative risk
Follow-upMaximum adjusted variables
Ehrlich 2011 ()GermanyPAF 278 (63)70 ± 11NR26.3%Total death1.56 (0.87–2.80)1.3 yearsAge, sex, hypertension, LVEF, CHADS2 score, previous stroke or TIA, implantable cardioverter/defibrillator, or pacemaker
Melgaard 2014 ()DenmarkRNon-valvular AF 73,799 (64.3)Mean 62.844.7% VKA11.2%Total death
2.02 (1.94–2.12) #
5 yearsFemale, prior stroke, HF, hypertension, vascular disease, VKA treatment
Inoue 2014 ()JapanPNon-valvular AF 7,406 (64.3)70.2 ± 9.986.5% warfarin18.3%Total death
1.02 (0.67–1.56)
CV death
1.33 (0.71–2.49)
2 yearsAge, sex, CHADS, CAD, cardiomyopathy, HF, hypertension, medications
Huang 2015 ()ChinaPNon-valvular AF 1,644 (48.3)70 ± 12.912.5% warfarin16.8%Total death
1.56 (1.13–2.16)
CV death
1.62 (1.05–2.48)
12 monthsAge, sex, weight, type of AF, stroke or TIA, HF, COPD, heart rate, ARB, lipid-lowering agents
Vılchez 2015 ()SpainPAF 562 (51)77 (71–82)100% anticoagulant28.0%Total death
1.76 (1.08–2.88)
4.3 yearsAge, history of stroke or TIA, CAD, renal failure, CHA2DS2-VASc score, soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2
Pastori 2015 ()ItalyPAF 837 (56.4)73.2 ± 8.5100% VKA19.8%CV death
2.43 (1.33–4.43)
2.5 yearsAge, sex, smoking, hypertension, MI, stroke/TIA, HF, use of antiplatelet agents and statins, 11-dehydro-thromboxane B2
Senoo 2016 ()JapanPAF 1,791 (50.5)81.8 ± 5.355.4% OAC22.3%Total death
1.12 (0.85–1.45)
12 monthsAge, sex, hypertension, HF, stroke, vascular disease, use of oral anticoagulation
Pokorney 2016 ()MultinationPost hocAF 14,171 (60.4)Median 73100% anticoagulant39.8%Total death
1.45 (1.28–1.67)
CV death
1.44 (1.24–1.68)
1.9 yearsAge, sex, race, ethnicity, region, heart rate, BMI, SBP, DBP, years of AF diagnosis, type of AF, stroke or TIA, HF, hypertension, creatinine clearance, creatinine, PAD, COPD, gastrointestinal bleeding, liver disease, alcohol, obstructive sleep apnea, left bundle branch block
Chamberlain 2017 ()IndiaRAF 1,430 (48.6)73.6 ± 13.8NR30.6%Total death
1.04 (0.90–1.21)
6.3 yearsAge, sex hyperlipidemia, hypertension, HF, CKD, smokers, substance abuse, CAD, stroke, cancer, COPD, depression, dementia, osteoporosis, anxiety, schizophrenia
Echouffo-Tcheugui 2017 ()USAPAF 9,749 (57.4)75 (67–82)76.4% OAC29.5%Total death
1.28 (1.12–1.46) #
CV death
1.31 (1.09–1.58) #
2.41 yearsAge, race, use of anticoagulants, eGFR, type of AF, history of ablation, pulse pressure
Karayiannides 2018 ()SwedenRNon-valvular AF 326,832 (55.3)74.7 ± 12.343.6% warfarin17.7%Total death
1.28 (1.25–1.31)
3.7 yearsAge, sex, comorbidities, medications
Perera 2018 ()MultinationPost hocAF 7,554 (58)71 ± 10NR19%Total death
1.4 (1.3–1.6)
3.7 yearsAge, BMI, race, stroke/TIA, heart rate, CAD, DBP, hemoglobin, eGFR, LVSD, antiplatelet therapy
Wändell 2018 ()SwedenRAF 12,283 (54.1)≥45NR19.6%Total death
1.12 (1.02–1.22) #
5.8 yearsAge, educational level, marital status, neighborhood socio-economic status, co-morbidities, anticoagulant treatment
Pastori 2019 ()ItalyPAF 5,215 (54.6)75 ± 9.674.3% VKA, 25.7% NOAC20.1Total death
1.32 (1.04–1.67)
1.6 yearsAge, sex, CKD, active cancer, HF, pulmonary disease, PAD, previous cardiovascular disease, medications
Polovina 2020 ()SerbiaPAF 1,803 (61)69 ± 1292.9% OAC22%Total death
1.56 (1.22–2.01)
CV death
1.48 (1.34–1.93)
5.0 yearsAge, sex, SBP, DBP, BMI, obesity, heart rate, HbA1c, cardiovascular history, LVEF, COPD, smoker, alcohol, hyperthyroidism, hypothyroidism, CKD, AF medications, antidiabetic agents
García-Fernández 2020 ()SpainPAF 1,956 (56)73.8 ± 9.575.8% VKA, 24.2% DOAC29.3%CV death
1.73 (1.07–2.80)
2.95 yearsAge, Charlson index, heart failure, HAS-BLED score
Oba 2020 ()JapanRAF 389 (49.9)80 (74–85)62% OAC31.6%Total death
1.48 (1.02–2.13)
CV death
2.05 (1.32–3.17)
3.8 yearsAge, sex, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, CAD, stroke, HF, PAD, sustained AF, use of OAC at baseline
Papazoglou 2021 ()GreecePost hocAF 1,109 (54.3)73.6 ± 10.925.4% VKA, 47.1% DOAC33.6%Total death
1.40 (1.11–1.75)
CV death
1.39 (1.07–1.81)
2.6 yearsAge, sex, AF subtype, BMI, prior stroke or CAD, use of anticoagulants, eGFR, ACEI-ARB, rate control medication after discharge
Kezerle 2021 ()IsraelRNon-valvular AF 44,451 (47.5)75 (65–83)24.4% warfarin, 16.2% DOAC39.9%Total death
1.47 (1.41–1.58)
3.2 yearsAge, sex, socioeconomic status, BMI, eGFR, hypertension, HF, previous stroke or TIA, vascular disease, any oral anticoagulant
Ding 2022 ()EuropePAF 11,028 (59.3)71 (63–77)86.7% anticoagulant23%Total death
1.28 (1.08–1.52)
CV death
1.41 (1.09–1.83)
2 yearsAge, sex, eGFR, COPD, CAD, HF, hypercholesterolaemia, hypertension, PAD, previous hemorrhagic event, thromboembolism, sleep apnea, use of anticoagulation.
Hammoudeh 2022 ()JordanPNon-valvular AF 1,849 (46.9)68.4 + 12.981.1% anticoagulant44.7%Total death
1.5 (1.1–2.2)
12 monthsAge, BMI, CAD, HF, use of OAC, major bleeding, enrolled as in-patient

Baseline characteristic of the included studies.

P, prospective; R, retrospective; NR, not reported; AF, atrial fibrillation; OAC, oral anticoagulation; NOAC, non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants; DOAC, direct oral anticoagulant; VKA, vitamin K antagonists; BMI, body mass index; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; CKD, chronic kidney disease; LVH, left ventricular hypertrophy; LVSD, left ventricular systolic dysfunction; HF, heart failure; MI, myocardial infarction; CAD, coronary artery disease; PAD, peripheral arterial disease; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin; NT-proBNP, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; TIA, transient ischemic attack; ACE/ARB, angiotensin-converting enzyme/angiotensin-receptor blockers; CV, cardiovascular disease.

#Results pooled from subgroup using a fixed-effects model.

Prevalence of diabetes mellitus in atrial fibrillation patients

The prevalence of diabetes mellitus ranged from 11.2% to 44.7%. As shown in Figure 2, the pooled prevalence of diabetes mellitus across the included studies was 0.26 (95% CI 0.22–0.30) in a random-effects model with significant heterogeneity (I2 = 99.9%; p < 0.001).

Figure 2

All-cause mortality

The association of diabetes mellitus with all-cause mortality was reported in 19 studies (–, , , –, –). A random-effects model meta-analysis indicated that diabetes mellitus was associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality (RR 1.37; 95% CI 1.23–1.53; I2 = 95.1%, p < 0.001; Figure 3) compared with those without diabetes. After a very large study () was removed, the pooled RR of all-cause mortality was 1.38 (95% CI 1.22–1.57). Leave-one-out study sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of the summary risk estimate (data not shown). There was no evidence of publication bias according to the results of Begg’s test (p = 0.441), Egger’s test (p = 0.964), and symmetry of the funnel plot (Supplementary Figure S1). Additionally, significant associations of diabetes mellitus with all-cause mortality were consistently observed in each subgroup (Table 2A).

Figure 3

Table 2

SubgroupNumber of studiesPooled risk ratio95% confidence intervalsHeterogeneity between studies
A. All-cause mortality
Study design
 Prospective
 Retrospective
 Post-hoc analysis
10
6
3
1.33
1.31
1.42
1.23–1.44
1.11–1.68
1.31–1.53
p = 0.527; I2 = 0.0%
p < 0.001; I2 = 98.6%
p = 0.915; I2 = 0.0%
Geographical region
 Asia
 Others
6
12
1.40
1.37
1.20–1.56
1.16–1.63
p = 0.242; I2 = 25.6%
p < 0.001; I2 = 97.2%
Atrial fibrillation type
 Non-valvular type
 All types
5
14
1.54
1.29
1.23–1.93
1.21–1.37
p < 0.001; I2 = 95.2%
p = 0.007; I2 = 55.2%
Sample sizes
 ≥3,000
 <3,000
10
9
1.39
1.36
1.18–1.58
1.18–1.57
p < 0.001; I2 = 97.4%
p = 0.037; I2 = 51.3%
Mean/median age
 ≥75 years
 <75 years
6
13
1.37
1.38
1.25–1.51
1.18–1.60
p = 0.159; I2 = 37.0%
p < 0.001; I2 = 96.7%
Follow-up duration
 ≥3 years
 <3 years
8
11
1.43
1.29
1.18–1.75
1.26–1.32
p < 0.001; I2 = 96.7%
p = 0.571; I2 = 0.0%
B. Cardiovascular mortality
Study design
 Prospective
 Post-hoc analysis
7
2
1.45
1.43
1.30–1.61
1.25–1.63
p = 0.555; I2 = 0.0%
p = 0.820; I2 = 0.0%
Geographical region
 Asia
 Others
3
6
1.71
1.43
1.30–2.25
1.29–1.59
p = 0.513 I2 = 0.0%
p = 0.462; I2 = 0.0%
Atrial fibrillation type
 Non-valvular type
 All types
2
8
1.52
1.45
1.07–2.17
1.34–1.58
p = 0.611; I2 = 0.0%
p = 0.419; I2 = 1.3%
Sample sizes
 ≥3,000
 <3,000
3
7
1.39
1.55
1.25–1.55
1.37–1.76
p = 0.737; I2 = 0.0%
p = 0.533; I2 = 0.0%
Mean/median age
 ≥75 years
 <75 years
2
8
1.40
1.47
1.18–1.66
1.34–1.62
p = 0.065; I2 = 70.6%
p = 0.807; I2 = 0.0%
Follow-up duration
 ≥2 years
 <2 years
8
2
1.46
1.46
1.32–1.61
1.26–1.68
p = 0.413; I2 = 2.2%
p = 0.613; I2 = 0.0%

Subgroup analyses on all-cause (A) and cardiovascular (B) mortality.

Cardiovascular mortality

Ten studies (, , , , , –, ) provided data on the association of diabetes mellitus with cardiovascular mortality. A fixed-effects model meta-analysis suggested that diabetes mellitus was associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular mortality (RR 1.46; 95% CI 1.34–1.58; I2 = 0%, p = 0.594; Figure 4) compared with those without diabetes. Leave-one-out study sensitivity analysis further confirmed the robustness of the summary risk estimate (data not shown). Furthermore, significant associations between diabetes mellitus with cardiovascular mortality were consistently observed in each subgroup (Table 2B). Egger’s test (p = 0.048) but not Begg’s test (p = 0.210) suggested the likelihood of publication bias. The ‘trim-and-fill’ analysis indicated that the pooling RR of cardiovascular mortality was 1.42 (95% CI 1.05–1.91; p < 0.001) and imputed three potentially missing studies (Supplementary Figure S2).

Figure 4

Discussion

This is the first meta-analysis to evaluate the impact of preexisting diabetes mellitus on cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in atrial fibrillation patients. Our meta-analysis confirmed that diabetes mellitus was associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation. Atrial fibrillation patients with preexisting diabetes had a 46% higher risk of cardiovascular mortality and 37% higher risk of all-cause mortality compared with their non-diabetic counterparts. These results indicated that the presence of diabetes mellitus in atrial fibrillation patients reinforced the mortality risk.

Apart from the cardiovascular and all-cause mortality outcomes, diabetes in atrial fibrillation patients also conferred a higher risk of heart failure (, ), myocardial infarction (), stroke (, ), and bleeding events (). These results suggested that diabetes is an important predictor of the risk classification of AF patients.

Atrial fibrillation and heart failure frequently coexist (). The presence of atrial fibrillation was associated with a higher risk of mortality in heart failure patients (). Conversely, incident heart failure conferred a particularly increased risk of mortality in patients with heart failure (). Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) are a class of medication approved for the management of type 2 diabetes. Treatment with SGLT2i could significantly reduce cardiovascular or all-cause mortality in heart failure in patients with or without diabetes (, ). Therefore, the association of diabetes with mortality outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation may also be biased by the use of SGLT2i.

Our subgroup analysis showed that the impact of diabetes on all-cause or cardiovascular mortality was similar in patients with age ≥75 years and those with age <75 years. This finding may be correlated with inadequate anticoagulation in many elderly atrial fibrillation patients (). Moreover, the value of diabetes in predicting all-cause or cardiovascular mortality appeared to be stronger in patients with a non-valvular type of atrial fibrillation. This result may be explained by the higher risk of stroke and the bleeding risk associated with anticoagulant treatment in the non-valvular type of atrial fibrillation (). However, it should be noted that the results of subgroup analysis were established on a limited number of studies.

The precise mechanisms underlying the impact of diabetes mellitus on survival in atrial fibrillation patients are not fully elucidated. First, atrial fibrillation patients with diabetes had more concomitant risk factors and comorbidities (, ). Second, atrial fibrillation patients with diabetes had a significant reduction in the quality of anticoagulation control (). Third, diabetes could also cause structural, electrical, electromechanical, and autonomic remodeling (), which could be responsible for atrial fibrillation recurrence. Finally, diabetes may promote the development of cardiomyopathy and heart failure through systemic inflammation, microvascular dysfunction, and oxidative stress (, ).

Our meta-analysis had important clinical implications. The prevalence of diabetes mellitus was up to 39.9% among patients with atrial fibrillation in our analyzed studies. The association between diabetes mellitus and atrial fibrillation has remained under-recognized by clinicians (). Considering atrial fibrillation patients with diabetes had reduced survival, close monitoring of blood glucose levels and intensive glycemic control are warranted for atrial fibrillation patients with diabetes. The degree of glycemic control may affect the prognosis of atrial fibrillation patients (). However, whether management of hyperglycemia in those with diabetes improves survival outcomes requires further study.

Several limitations should be mentioned in the current meta-analysis. First, half of the included studies were retrospective in nature, and potential selection bias may have occurred. Second, significant heterogeneity was found in pooling the prevalence of diabetes and all-cause mortality. Different types of atrial fibrillation, methods of diabetes diagnosis, or duration of follow-up may partially explain the observed heterogeneity. Third, the impact of diabetes on survival outcomes may be biased by the use of different anticoagulant agents in patients with atrial fibrillation (). Lack of adjusted information on the use of medications (including antidiabetic drugs, anticoagulation, and heart failure-directed therapy), severity or duration of diabetes, and glycemic control may confound the pooling risk summary. Finally, the analyzed studies did not distinguish the pattern of atrial fibrillation (permanent or persistent) and type of diabetes mellitus (type 1 or type 2) in patients with atrial fibrillation. Particularly, the anticoagulant therapy was not clearly reported in the included studies. Therefore, we failed to perform a subgroup analysis based on these factors.

Conclusions

The presence of diabetes mellitus in patients with atrial fibrillation is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality, even after adjustment for important confounding factors. Detection of blood glucose levels may improve risk stratification of survival outcomes in atrial fibrillation patients.

Funding

This work is supported by 1) Jiangsu Provincial Key Research and Development Special Fund (CXTDC2016006, QNRC2016446), 2) Zhenjiang Key Research and Development Fund (SH2021038), and 3) Suqian Science and Technology Support Project Fund (K201907).

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Statements

Data availability statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Author contributions

Study conception/design and interpretation of data: DG and YF. Literature search, data extraction, quality assessment, and statistical analysis: JX and YS. Writing the manuscript: JX. Revising the manuscript: YF. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fendo.2022.921159/full#supplementary-material

References

  • 1

    OdutayoAWongCXHsiaoAJHopewellSAltmanDGEmdinCA. Atrial fibrillation and risks of cardiovascular disease, renal disease, and death: Systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ (2016) 354:i4482. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i4482

  • 2

    KornejJBorschelCSBenjaminEJSchnabelRB. Epidemiology of atrial fibrillation in the 21st century: Novel methods and new insights. Circ Res (2020) 127(1):4–20. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.120.316340

  • 3

    AbdoolMKunutsorSKKhuntiKSeiduS. Does the presence of diabetes mellitus confer an increased risk of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation on direct oral anticoagulants? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Metab Syndr (2020) 14(6):1725–33. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2020.08.038

  • 4

    RuddoxVSandvenIMunkhaugenJSkattebuJEdvardsenTOtterstadJE. Atrial fibrillation and the risk for myocardial infarction, all-cause mortality and heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Prev Cardiol (2017) 24(14):1555–66. doi: 10.1177/2047487317715769

  • 5

    AuneDFengTSchlesingerSJanszkyINoratTRiboliE. Diabetes mellitus, blood glucose and the risk of atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. J Diabetes Complications (2018) 32(5):501–11. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2018.02.004

  • 6

    WangYO'NeilAJiaoYWangLHuangJLanYet al. Sex differences in the association between diabetes and risk of cardiovascular disease, cancer, and all-cause and cause-specific mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 5,162,654 participants. BMC Med (2019) 17(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s12916-019-1355-0

  • 7

    WangAGreenJBHalperinJLPicciniJPSR. Atrial fibrillation and diabetes mellitus: JACC review topic of the week. J Am Coll Cardiol (2019) 74(8):1107–15. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.07.020

  • 8

    EhrlichJRKaluznyMBaumannSLehmannRHohnloserSH. Biomarkers of structural remodelling and endothelial dysfunction for prediction of cardiovascular events or death in patients with atrial fibrillation. Clin Res Cardiol (2011) 100(11):1029–36. doi: 10.1007/s00392-011-0337-9

  • 9

    InoueHAtarashiHOkumuraKYamashitaTOrigasaHKumagaiNet al. Impact of gender on the prognosis of patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol (2014) 113(6):957–62. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.11.057

  • 10

    SenooKAnYOgawaHLaneDAWolffAShantsilaEet al. Stroke and death in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation in Japan compared with the united kingdom. Heart (2016) 102(23):1878–82. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2016-309741

  • 11

    ChamberlainAMAlonsoAGershBJManemannSMKillianJMWestonSAet al. Multimorbidity and the risk of hospitalization and death in atrial fibrillation: A population-based study. Am Heart J (2017) 185:74–84. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2016.11.008

  • 12

    MoherDLiberatiATetzlaffJAltmanDG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med (2009) 151(4):264–9, W64. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135

  • 13

    WellsGSheaBO'ConnellDPetersonJWelchVLososMet al. The Newcastle–Ottawa scale (NOS) for assessing the quality if nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses . Available at: http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp (Accessed May 19, 2022).

  • 14

    MelgaardLRasmussenLHSkjothFLipGYLarsenTB. Age dependence of risk factors for stroke and death in young patients with atrial fibrillation: A nationwide study. Stroke (2014) 45(5):1331–7. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.004903

  • 15

    HuangBYangYZhuJLiangYZhangHTianLet al. Clinical characteristics and impact of diabetes mellitus on outcomes in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Yonsei Med J (2015) 56(1):62–71. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2015.56.1.62

  • 16

    PastoriDPignatelliPFarcomeniACangemiRHiattWRBartimocciaSet al. Urinary 11-dehydro-thromboxane B2 is associated with cardiovascular events and mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation. Am Heart J (2015) 170(3):490–7.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2015.05.011

  • 17

    KarayiannidesSLundmanPFribergLNorhammarA. High overall cardiovascular risk and mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation and diabetes: A nationwide report. Diabetes Vasc Dis Res (2018) 15(1):31–8. doi: 10.1177/1479164117735013

  • 18

    VilchezJAPerez-CuellarMMarinFGallegoPManzano-FernandezSValdesMet al. sST2 levels are associated with all-cause mortality in anticoagulated patients with atrial fibrillation. Eur J Clin Invest (2015) 45(9):899–905. doi: 10.1111/eci.12482

  • 19

    PokorneySDPicciniJPStevensSRPatelMRPieperKSHalperinJLet al. Cause of death and predictors of all-cause mortality in anticoagulated patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: Data from ROCKET AF. J Am Heart Assoc (2016) 5(3):e002197. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.002197

  • 20

    Echouffo-TcheuguiJBShraderPThomasLGershBJKoweyPRMahaffeyKWet al. Care patterns and outcomes in atrial fibrillation patients with and without diabetes: ORBIT-AF registry. J Am Coll Cardiol (2017) 70(11):1325–35. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.07.755

  • 21

    PereraKSPearceLASharmaMBenaventeOConnollySJHartRGet al. Predictors of mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation (from the atrial fibrillation clopidogrel trial with irbesartan for prevention of vascular events [ACTIVE a]). Am J Cardiol (2018) 121(5):584–9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.11.028

  • 22

    WandellPCarlssonACHolzmannMJArnlovJSundquistJSundquistK. Mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation and common co-morbidities - a cohort study in primary care. Ann Med (2018) 50(2):156–63. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2017.1407036

  • 23

    PastoriDAntonucciEVioliFPalaretiGPignatelliPSRIddet al. Thrombocytopenia and mortality risk in patients with atrial fibrillation: An analysis from the START registry. J Am Heart Assoc (2019) 8(21):e012596. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.012596

  • 24

    PolovinaMLundLHDikicDPetrovic-DordevicIKrljanacGMilinkovicIet al. Type 2 diabetes increases the long-term risk of heart failure and mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation. Eur J Heart Fail (2020) 22(1):113–25. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1666

  • 25

    Garcia-FernandezAEsteve-PastorMARoldan-RabadanIMunizJRuiz OrtizMCequierAet al. Relationship of adverse events to quality of anticoagulation control in atrial fibrillation patients with diabetes: real-world data from the FANTASIIA registry. Ann Med (2020) 52(6):300–9. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2020.1778176

  • 26

    ObaKShinjoTTamashiroMMatsuokaMArasakiOArimaHet al. Cause of death and associated factors in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation- long-term retrospective study. Circ Rep (2020) 2(9):490–8. doi: 10.1253/circrep.CR-20-0079

  • 27

    PapazoglouASKartasASamarasAVouloagkasIVranaEMoysidisDVet al. Prognostic significance of diabetes mellitus in patients with atrial fibrillation. Cardiovasc Diabetol (2021) 20(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12933-021-01232-7

  • 28

    KezerleLTsadokMAAkrivASendereyABBachrachALeventer-RobertsMet al. Pre-diabetes increases stroke risk in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol (2021) 77(7):875–84. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.12.030

  • 29

    DingWYKotalczykABorianiGMarinFBlomstrom-LundqvistCPotparaTSet al. Impact of diabetes on the management and outcomes in atrial fibrillation: An analysis from the ESC-EHRA EORP-AF long-term general registry. Eur J Intern Med (2022) S0953-6205(22)00167-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2022.04.026

  • 30

    HammoudehAKhaderYTabbalatRBadainehYKadriNShawerHet al. One-year clinical outcome in middle Eastern patients with atrial fibrillation: The Jordan atrial fibrillation (JoFib) study. Int J Vasc Med (2022) 2022:4240999. doi: 10.1155/2022/4240999

  • 31

    AriyaratnamJPLauDHSandersPKalmanJM. Atrial fibrillation and heart failure: Epidemiology, pathophysiology, prognosis, and management. Card Electrophysiol Clin (2021) 13(1):47–62. doi: 10.1016/j.ccep.2020.11.004

  • 32

    OdutayoAWongCXWilliamsRHunnBEmdinCA. Prognostic importance of atrial fibrillation timing and pattern in adults with congestive heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Card Fail (2017) 23(1):56–62. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2016.08.005

  • 33

    SleeASaksenaS. Impact of initial heart failure emergence on clinical outcomes of atrial fibrillation patients in the AFFIRM trial. Am Heart J (2020) 220:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2019.10.005

  • 34

    ButlerJUsmanMSKhanMSGreeneSJFriedeTVaduganathanMet al. Efficacy and safety of SGLT2 inhibitors in heart failure: Systematic review and meta-analysis. ESC Heart Fail (2020) 7(6):3298–309. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13169

  • 35

    ZannadFFerreiraJPPocockSJAnkerSDButlerJFilippatosGet al. SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: A meta-analysis of the EMPEROR-reduced and DAPA-HF trials. Lancet (2020) 396(10254):819–29. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31824-9

  • 36

    TayaaSBerrutGde DeckerLChevaletP. Direct oral anticoagulants in non-valvular atrial fibrillation in elderly: For a treatment adapted to patient profile. Geriatr Psychol Neuropsychiatr Vieil (2018) 16(3):229–40. doi: 10.1684/pnv.2018.0746

  • 37

    GoudisCAKorantzopoulosPNtalasIVKallergisEMLiuTKetikoglouDG. Diabetes mellitus and atrial fibrillation: Pathophysiological mechanisms and potential upstream therapies. Int J Cardiol (2015) 184:617–22. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.03.052

  • 38

    JiaGHillMASowersJR. Diabetic cardiomyopathy: An update of mechanisms contributing to this clinical entity. Circ Res (2018) 122(4):624–38. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.117.311586

  • 39

    Nikolajevic StarcevicJJanicMSabovicM. Molecular mechanisms responsible for diastolic dysfunction in diabetes mellitus patients. Int J Mol Sci (2019) 20(5). doi: 10.3390/ijms20051197

  • 40

    PlittAMcGuireDKGiuglianoRP. Atrial fibrillation, type 2 diabetes, and non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants: A review. JAMA (2017) 2(4):442–8. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2016.5224

  • 41

    Costard-JäckleATschöpeDMeinertzT. Cardiovascular outcome in type 2 diabetes and atrial fibrillation. Herz (2019) 44(6):522–5. doi: 10.1007/s00059-018-4704-4

  • 42

    AcanforaDCicconeMMCarlomagnoVScicchitanoPAcanforaCBortoneASet al. A systematic review of the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation patients with diabetes using a risk index. J Clin Med (2021) 10(13). doi: 10.3390/jcm10132924

Summary

Keywords

diabetes mellitus, atrial fibrillation, all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, meta-analysis

Citation

Xu J, Sun Y, Gong D and Fan Y (2022) Impact of preexisting diabetes mellitus on cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation: A meta-analysis. Front. Endocrinol. 13:921159. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.921159

Received

15 April 2022

Accepted

01 July 2022

Published

01 August 2022

Volume

13 - 2022

Edited by

Marco Matteo Ciccone, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Italy

Reviewed by

Daniele Pastori, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy; Pietro Scicchitano, ASLBari - Azienda Sanitaria Localedella provincia di Bari (ASL BA), Italy; Louise Kezerle, McGill University Health Centre, Canada

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Yu Fan, ; Dandan Gong,

†These authors have contributed equally to this work

This article was submitted to Clinical Diabetes, a section of the journal Frontiers in Endocrinology

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics