MINI REVIEW article

Front. Endocrinol., 08 February 2023

Sec. Neuroendocrine Science

Volume 14 - 2023 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2023.1132787

Phenotypic and genotypic landscape of PROKR2 in neuroendocrine disorders

  • Instituto de Biociencia, Biotecnología y Biología Traslacional (iB3), Departamento de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Celular, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Abstract

Prokineticin receptor 2 (PROKR2) encodes for a G-protein-coupled receptor that can bind PROK1 and PROK2. Mice lacking Prokr2 have been shown to present abnormal olfactory bulb formation as well as defects in GnRH neuron migration. Patients carrying mutations in PROKR2 typically present hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, anosmia/hyposmia or Kallmann Syndrome. More recently variants in PROKR2 have been linked to several other endocrine disorders. In particular, several patients with pituitary disorders have been reported, ranging from mild phenotypes, such as isolated growth hormone deficiency, to more severe ones, such as septo-optic dysplasia. Here we summarize the changing landscape of PROKR2-related disease, the variants reported to date, and discuss their origin, classification and functional assessment.

Introduction

Prokineticin receptor 2 (PROKR2) encodes PROKR2, a 384 amino acids long G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR). PROKR1 and PROKR2 share around 85% sequence identity, and share ligands, called prokineticins (PROK1 and PROK2). When the ligands bind to PROKR2, the GPCR activates several signaling pathways, including IP3/Ca2+ signaling, the MAPK pathway, and cAMP signaling. Prokineticin signaling is involved in different biological functions, including mood regulation, smooth muscle contraction, angiogenesis, neurogenesis, food intake and the circadian clock (1–6). PROKR2 shows localized distribution in the central nervous system, with particularly high expression in the suprachiasmatic nucleus and the olfactory bulbs (6, 7). Prokr2−/− knockout mice present abnormal olfactory bulb formation and severe atrophy of the reproductive system in both sexes, a phenotype similar to Kallmann Syndrome (KS) in humans (8). At the hypothalamic level, immunohistochemistry revealed a lack of neuroendocrine GnRH cells (gonadotropin-releasing hormone expressing neurons) (8). The same year Dodé et al. searched for mutations in PROKR2 in patients that presented KS, linking for the first time PROKR2 with pubertal delays and smell disorders (9).

Since then, the diminishing cost of massive parallel sequencing has allowed for more broad panels and recently, whole exome sequencing of patients not only with KS or hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (HH), but with other endocrine disorders as well. As a result of this expansion in diagnostic sequencing, PROKR2 has been recently linked to pituitary diseases, such as isolated growth hormone deficiency (IGHD) (10–14) combined pituitary hormone deficiency (CPHD), pituitary stalk interruption syndrome (15, 16) and septo-optic-dysplasia (13, 17), as well as a rare case of central precocious puberty (18).

In light of this expansion in PROKR2 phenotypes and number of patients sequenced in recent years, we aimed to collect PROKR2 reported variants in clinical cases and to establish genotype-phenotype correlations where possible. We also performed an up-to-date ACMG re-classification of each variant, in association to all functional data available.

Search strategy

A literature search was conducted to identify studies describing human genetic variants in PROKR2, using two databases: PubMed and SCOPUS. The complete search strategy is presented in Figure 1A. From the included literature, the following data items were collected: described patient variants, their frequency, variant type, associated pathology and country of origin of the patient. Studies were excluded if patients had been reported previously or if studies were not available in English. Studies were screened by title and abstract and potentially relevant studies were reviewed by full-text analysis. The literature search identified 294 publications after the removal of duplicates. The titles and abstracts of these publications were screened and assessed for eligibility, resulting in 121 full-text articles deemed to be included in the review. Of these, after evaluation of the full text of the publications, 41 studies were excluded. Ultimately, a total of 80 studies were included in the present review (Figure 1A).

Figure 1

Complex phenotypes caused by genetic variants in PROKR2

The absolute number of cases with PROKR2 variants in the included literature was 435, carrying a total of 453 variants, 78 of those variants being unique. KS carried the highest number of cases (236), followed by HH (108). Both diseases are highly related, as evidenced by the co-occurrence of both phenotypes in family trees (19) and their shared genetic etiology (20). Anosmia and hyposmia without pubertal delay have also been reported, accounting for a small number of cases (9, 21–24). As has been described in mice, impairment of PROKR2-mediated migration of neurons, particularly interneurons, to the olfactory bulb is sufficient to explain the anosmia or hyposmia phenotype (25). Similarly, in the hypothalamus, the neuronal migration defect can impair GnRH secretion resulting in hypogonadism (8). In recent years, reports associating PROKR2 variants to hypopituitarism and related disorders have emerged. Until now, 37 cases harboring PROKR2 mutations presented pituitary diseases: the majority were CPHD and IGHD, followed by septo-optic dysplasia and pituitary stalk interruption syndrome (Figure 1B). Given the lack of a clear molecular explanation for this novel spectrum of PROKR2-related disease, further study on the role of PROKR2 on pituitary development and disease is needed.

To date, one case of central precocious puberty has been described by Fukami et al. A female patient carried an heterozygous frameshift mutation (p.C242fsTer64), predicted to be gain of function based on Ca2+ mobilization assays. A gain of function in PROKR2 could lead to an untimely activation of the GnRH neurons and ultimately lead to CPP (18). However, another study including 31 female patients with central precocious puberty aimed to further strengthen the link between PROKR2 and CPP and no genotype-phenotype correlations were found (26). We believe the putative link deserves further study and should be taken into consideration in future precocious puberty studies.

It is important to note that the majority of patients present heterozygous PROKR2 variants. A small number of variants have been found in homozygous fashion (≃7%), and an even smaller number of cases present compound heterozygous inheritance (≃3%). Several mutations have also been found in apparently unaffected individuals, which suggests either incomplete penetrance or a digenic/oligogenic mode of inheritance in heterozygous patients (27). An example of this, is a patient presenting KS and homozygous early stop codon variant p.Y140*. Both parents are heterozygous for the same variant and are asymptomatic (28). Another two cases were reported with gain of stop codon variants: p.K162* and p.W288*, both in heterozygosity in patients with KS (29, 30). This seemingly different mode of inheritance (autosomal recessive vs autosomal dominant) for similar pathogenic variants points to either incomplete penetrance or oligogenicity as an intrinsic part of PROKR2-related disease.

With regards to oligogenicity, up to 20% of PROKR2 cases are reported together with variants in another gene: the most commonly associated genes are: FGFR1, CHD7, ANOS1, PROK2, GNRHR and SEMA3A. The first case of oligogenicity was reported by Cost-Barbosa et al., who identified a patient with KS and ligand/receptor (i.e. PROK2/PROKR2) mutations (31). Variants in these two genes affect the same pathway, a ligand that does not bind properly together with a receptor that already has impaired signaling, results in disease and explains genotype-phenotype correlation. A similar idea can explain GNRHR oligogenic cases. A weakened GnRH signaling due to PROKR2 mutations is further amplified by a defective receptor signal.

ANOS1 is involved in GnRH neuron migration, similar to PROKR2 (32). Although their mechanisms of action are different, a weakened gene regulatory network could explain how mutations in both genes at the same time could trigger a more severe disruption in neuron migration. FGFR1 plays a role in neurite extension of GnRH neurons (33). We know that despite a probable defect in GnRH neuron migration, patients carrying PROKR2 variants might still be healthy. We speculate that in patients that also carry FGFR1 mutations, the combination of migration and neurite formation defects leads to disease at an increased rate.

CHD7 has been historically linked to CHARGE syndrome (34). Although mice models show evidence for its role in olfactory bulb formation (35), its role in GnRH neurons has not been elucidated yet. Interestingly, there is also evidence that SEMA3A might play a role in CHARGE syndrome. It was shown that reduced expression CHD7 also leads to reduced expression of SEMA3A (36). Heterozygous variants in SEMA3A cause KS and HH. Recently, two cases were reported with LP variants in SEMA3A, one case with CPHD and pituitary stalk interrption syndrome, the other with CPHD and heart/skeletal abnormalities (37). Given that both genes are often reported in oligogenic cases together with PROKR2, this begs the question of whether there are also common regulatory pathways between CHD7/SEMA3A and PROKR2 that might influence GnRH neurons.

Overall oligogenicity is probably an important player in PROKR2-related disease and could help explain at least part of the incompletely penetrant phenotypes typically seen in these patients.

PROKR2 variants around the world

Most studies were performed in Asia (25 studies), Europe (22 studies) and North America (14 studies). In particular, the USA and China together amounted to more than half of the total patients studied. The low number of sequencing studies in Africa and South America is concerning, considering both continents together represent over 20% of the world population. Studies performed in these continents were also restricted geographically, to either northern Africa or just Argentina and Brazil in the case of South America. Variants circulating in these populations are currently an unexploited resource that could help reclassify known variants, as well as allow for the discovery of novel ones.

Some variants have a clear regional predominance. The p.W178S variant seems to be most prevalent in continental Asia (mainly in China, although it has also been reported in South Korea and Japan) (10, 30, 38–47). Nevertheless the variant has also been described in the USA and France, in patients of undisclosed ethnicity (9, 29). The high presence of this variant in Asian patients as well as its relatively high frequency in the east Asian population on GnomAD (1/500), point to it being a regional polymorphism (27).

Other missense variants unique to Asia are p.G57C, p.A103V and p.Y113H (23, 29–31, 38, 41–44, 46–51). The variants p.G57C, p.A103V were found in two and five patients with KS/HH respectively and both are classified as variants of uncertain significance (VUS) with a frequency of 1/1000 in this population. The variant p.Y113H is reported in twenty patients with a big range of phenotypes (KS, HH, CPHD, IGHD, SOD) and even though bioinformatic predictions mark it as pathogenic and functional studies show loss of function (LoF) (Table 1), it has high frequency in Gnomad (1/700 in East Asia), leading to its VUS classification (Figure 1C). Taking into consideration the total number of patients included in this review and their absence in other populations in GnomAD, it seems likely that these variants are indeed local. Further research is needed to determine whether these variants are pathogenic with incomplete penetrance and whether there are foundational effects.

Table 1

VariantDomainExpression levelsMAPK/ERK pathway (Gi/o)IP3/Ca2+ release pathway (Gq)cAMP pathway (Gs)BindingFunctional assessment
42insEDECL1= 44= 44↓44= 44NELB
A51TECL1=14,21,57= 21 or ↓57=14,57 or ↓21= 21 or ↓57=14,57CI
V55ITM1= 21= 21↓21↓21NELoF
M64VTM1↑21= 21= 21↓21NELB
R80CICL1↓21,56,57↓21,56 or =57↓21,56 or =57↓21,57↓56 or =57LoF
R85CICL1=21,56,57=21,31,57 or ↓56=21,56,57 or ↓31,60= 57 or ↓21=56,57,60LB
R85HICL1↓21,57,60 or =14,56↓21,56,57↓21,57,60 or = 56= 57 or ↓21=56,57,60 or ↓14LoF
R85LICL1↑21 or ↓57↓21 or Ø 57↓21,57↓21 or Ø 57↓57LoF
R85GICL1↓17,21↓17,21↓17,21↓21NELoF
M111RTM2= 21↓21↓21↓21NELoF
D112YECL2= 21= 21= 21↓21NELB
Y113HECL2↓21,31,57↓21,31 or Ø 57↓21,31,57↓21 or Ø 57↓57LoF
V115M
R117W		ECL2
ECL2		= 21 or ↓31,57
↓57		↓21,31 or Ø 57
NE		↓21,31,57
NE		↓21 or Ø 57
NE		NE
NE		LoF
LoF
R135CTM3↓21↓21↓21↓21NELoF
V158IICL2= 21 or ↓53↓21= 53 or ↓21= 53 or ↓21NECI
R164QICL2=21,57,59↓21,31,57↓21,31,57,59,60= 57 or ↓21= 57LoF
L173RTM4↓14,31,53,57,60 or = 21↓31,21 or Ø 57↓21,31.53,57,60↓21,53 or Ø 57↓14LoF
W178STM4↓21,31,57,60,64↓31,21 or Ø 57↓21,31,60↓21 or Ø 57NELoF
S188LTM4= 21 or ↓31,57↓31,21 or Ø 57↓21,31↓21 or Ø 57NELoF
S202GECL3= 21↓21= 21= 21NELB
Q210RECL3=21,57↓21 or Ø 57↑21 or ↓60↓21 or Ø 57↓57,60LoF
L218PECL3= 44= 44Ø 44= 44NELB
G229RTM5↓44↓44Ø 44Ø 44NELoF
E231KTM5↓44↓44Ø 44Ø 44NELoF
G234DTM5Ø57,64 or ↓21↓21 or Ø 57↓21↓21 or Ø 57NELoF
C242fsTM5NENE↑18NENEGoF
R248QICL3= 21= 31 or ↓21= 21 or ↓31↓21NECI
W251LICL3= 21 or ↓57= 21 or Ø 57↓21,57↓21,57↓57LoF
T260MICL3= 21 or ↓53↓21↓21,53↓21,53NELoF
R268CICL3=21,57 or ↓53↓21 or Ø 53↓21,53,60 or = 57↓21,53 or = 57= 57LoF
R270HICL3=21,44↓21 or Ø44↓21=21,44NELoF
R270CICL3↓21↓21↓21= 21NELoF
V274DTM6↓53,57,58 or ↑21Ø 57,58 or ↓21Ø 21,57,58 or ↓53↓21,53 or Ø 57NELoF
P290STM6= 21 or ↓57,60 orØ 64↓21 or Ø 57Ø 57,60 or ↓21↓21 or Ø 57NELoF
V297IECL4= 21= 21= 21↓21NELB
V317LTM7= 21= 21= 21= 21NEB
M323ITM7↑21 or ↓57↓21,57=21,57,60= 57 or ↓21= 57CI
N325KTM7= 21↓21↑21↓21NELoF
V331MTM7↓53,57,60 or = 21= 21 or ↓57↓31,53,57,60,61 or ↑21= 53,57= 57CI
V334MTM7↑53 or ↓21↓21↓21,53↓21,53NELoF
R353HICL4= 44↓44↓44= 44NELoF
R357WICL4= 57=21,57 or ↑31↓21,31 or = 57= 57 or ↑21NECI
G371RICL4NE= 21= 21= 21NEB

Variants in PROKR2 and their functional assessment.

The affected domain is shown (ECL, extracellular domain; ICL, intracellular domain; TM, transmembrane domain). For each functional aspect tested, the following convention was used: ↑, Increased; ↓, Reduced; Ø, No function; =, Unchanged; NE, Not evaluated; B, Benign; LB, Likely Benign; LoF, Loss of function; GoF, Gain of function; CI, Conflicting interpretation. Numbers indicate each corresponding reference.

Another variant with an interesting regional pattern is p.P290S. This variant was originally reported by Dodé et al. in French patients with KS, but it has been found at an increased frequency in Maghrebian patients. France’s population also has a high population percentage of immigrants with maghrebian origins (52), meaning the variants found in french cohorts could be attributed to maghrebian immigration. Functional testing indicates the variant is a LoF (Table 1). Nevertheless the variant is currently classified as a VUS, given its high frequency in Gnomad (0.0004).

Several patients have been reported with heterozygous nonsense variants, either due to a premature stop or a frameshift that results in a truncated protein. Although these variants are deemed to be causative of the disease, the relatively high prevalence of p.H20MfsTer24 in the European and Latino/Admixed population is intriguing (27). A founder effect may be at play in the European population, given that patients with these mutations have only been reported in Italy and France (9, 53). The symptoms of these patients were quite diverse (Figure 1C), ranging from KS/HH to CPHD and anosmia. It is also interesting to note that transcripts harboring such variants would likely be subject to nonsense mediated decay (NMD). NMD can trigger genetic compensation through increased transcription of adapting genes (54). PROKR2 and PROKR1 share ligands and their distinct actions are thought to arise from specificity at the level of tissue expression more so than functional differences (55). Given their high homology degree, incomplete penetrance due to genetic compensation for this type of variants seems plausible and warrants further investigation.

The importance of functional assays

PROKR2 is able to activate different G-proteins common to GPCR receptors, namely Gαi/o, Gαq and Gαs. Each of these pathways can be linked to canonical signal transduction pathways: MAPK/ERK pathway (Gαi/o), IP3/Ca2+ release pathway (Gαq) and cAMP pathway (Gαs). Several PROKR2 functional testing methodologies have been applied for each different pathway.

To study MAPK/ERK signaling two assays have been used. The most commonly used is the Egr1-luciferase assay (21, 31, 56). In this assay cells are transfected with wilde-type and mutant PROKR2 expression plasmids, together with luciferase expression vectors. In this case the plasmid carries binding sites for EGR1, a downstream effector of p-ERK. After 24 hours the cells are then stimulated with a range of PROK2 concentrations, to generate a dose-response curve. The second assay is very similar, but instead of luciferase the final outcome measured is p-ERK protein levels through Western Blot analysis (44, 57). Variants are then evaluated on the percentage of activation that they elicit compared to wilde-type.

The IP3/Ca2+ release pathway (Gαq) was measured in several ways. The most frequent assay was aequorin-based (17, 31, 44, 58, 59). This method also relies on transfection, where PROKR2 WT and mutant expression plasmids are co-transfected with an aequorin expression plasmid. Upon posterior activation of PROKR2 with PROK2, aequorin is activated by calcium release, producing light at 470 nm as an output signal. Another frequently used method was the Fluo-4 calcium reporter method (57, 60, 61). In this case Fluo-4 is added to the transfected cells, where it permeates the membrane. Once PROKR2 is activated, the subsequent intracellular calcium release triggers light emission by Fluo-4 in the 500-525 nm range.

In contrast, there are not many widely adopted cAMP pathway functional assays. Luciferase based assays have been used as described before, making use of the pGlosensor-22F cAMP sensor (21, 44). In this assay an engineered fused Luciferase is used, which carries a cAMP binding domain, and only emits light after a conformational change induced by cAMP binding (62). Other alternative functional assays have also been used, such as the commercial cAMP HTRF assay or RIA (53, 57).

Localization and expression of the receptor has been evaluated for multiple variants, mostly through Western Blot and immunofluorescence. Specific ligand binding affinity has also been tested for some variants using radioligand binding assays (14, 56, 57, 60, 63). For all reported variants where functional testing was available we took every assay into consideration and summarized the results in Table 1.

We labeled each variant as Benign (B), Likely benign (LB), conflicting interpretation (CI) or gain/loss of function (GoF/LoF), according to a qualitative consensus among studies. We considered a variant to be LoF if at least two assays showed a defect, or one assay was proven to cause loF and was tested by at least two independent publications, without conflicting results. Variants with just one defective assay were considered Likely Benign (LB), while those with none were considered Benign (B). It should be emphasized that functional assay results are not synonymous with pathogenicity. A clear example of this are variants L173R and R268C, which should be considered Benign according to ACMG criteria, despite their seemingly impaired signaling. They both present relatively high frequency in the general population, as well as homozygous individuals in GnomAD, but they could be possible risk factors given their increased frequencies in individuals with disease (64).

Despite some contradictions, generally functional assays are of great relevance for classifying most variants. Examples of this are the variants that fall in the transmembrane domain five (TM5): p.G229R, p.E231K and p.G234D. The functionally available data points to all of them being LoF, and this evidence leads to their classification as Pathogenic (P) or Likely Pathogenic (LP) (Figure 1C; Table 1). Two further variants in that same domain, p.V233M and p.Y243C, lack functional evidence and currently remain VUS. Remarkably over three quarters of the remaining VUS also lack functional testing. This exemplifies just how critical functional testing is for PROKR2 variant assessment and subsequent genetic counseling.

Conclusion

Since the initial report from Dodé et al. in 2006, many studies have reported PROKR2 genetic alterations in patients with neuroendocrine disorders. A vast majority of these patients have insufficiencies in the gonadal axis, commonly with hyposmia or anosmia, while a minority present diverse forms of hypopituitarism.

This review provides a comprehensive catalog of published PROKR2 variants described to date. Our catalog of predicted pathogenic variants may serve as a guideline for future genetic studies. In summary, this review represents a useful resource for clinicians overseeing PROKR2-related diseases and will help scientists to focus on the missing gaps of the literature to further cement its role in diseases concerning the hypothalamus-pituitary axis.

Statements

Author contributions

All authors planned and wrote the paper. JM-M designed the figures. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

PICT 2018 4239 to MIPM.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

  • 1

    LiJDHuWPZhouQY. Disruption of the circadian output molecule prokineticin 2 results in anxiolytic and antidepressant-like effects in mice. Neuropsychopharmacology (2008) 34:367–73. doi: 10.1038/npp.2008.61

  • 2

    LiMBullockCMKnauerDJEhlertFJZhouQY. Identification of two prokineticin cDNAs: Recombinant proteins potently contract gastrointestinal smooth muscle. Mol Pharmacol (2001) 59:692–8. doi: 10.1124/mol.59.4.692

  • 3

    MonnierJSamsonM. Prokineticins in angiogenesis and cancer. Cancer Lett (2010) 296:144–9. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2010.06.011

  • 4

    NgKLLiJDChengMYLeslieFMLeeAGZhouQY. Dependence of olfactory bulb neurogenesis on prokineticin 2 signaling. Science (2005) 308:1923–7. doi: 10.1126/science.1112103

  • 5

    GardinerJVBataveljicAPatelNABewickGARoyDCampbellDet al. Prokineticin 2 is a hypothalamic neuropeptide that potently inhibits food intake. Diabetes (2009) 59:397–406. doi: 10.2337/db09-1198

  • 6

    ChengMYBullockCMLiCLeeAGBermakJCBelluzziJet al. Prokineticin 2 transmits the behavioural circadian rhythm of the suprachiasmatic nucleus. Nature (2002) 417:405–10. doi: 10.1038/417405a

  • 7

    LiJDHuWPBoehmerLChengMYLeeAGJilekAet al. Attenuated circadian rhythms in mice lacking the prokineticin 2 gene. J Neurosci (2006) 26:11615–23. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3679-06.2006

  • 8

    MatsumotoSIYamazakiCMasumotoKHNaganoMNaitoMSogaTet al. Abnormal development of the olfactory bulb and reproductive system in mice lacking prokineticin receptor PKR2. PNAS (2006) 103:4140–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0508881103

  • 9

    DodéCTeixeiraLLevilliersJFouveautCBouchardPKottlerMLet al. Kallmann syndrome: Mutations in the genes encoding prokineticin-2 and prokineticin receptor-2. PLoS Genet (2006) 2:e175. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.0020175

  • 10

    AhnJOhJSuhJSongKKwonAChaeHWet al. Next-generation sequencing-based mutational analysis of idiopathic short stature and isolated growth hormone deficiency in Korean pediatric patients. Mol Cell Endocrinol (2022) 544:111489. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2021.111489

  • 11

    HeDLiYYangWChenSSunHLiPet al. Molecular diagnosis for growth hormone deficiency in Chinese children and adolescents and evaluation of impact of rare genetic variants on treatment efficacy of growth hormone. Clinica Chimica Acta (2022) 524:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2021.11.021

  • 12

    ParsonsSJHWrightNBBurkitt-WrightESkaeMSMurrayPG. A heterozygous microdeletion of 20p12.2-3 encompassingPROKR2andBMP2in a patient with congenital hypopituitarism and growth hormone deficiency. Am J Med Genet (2017) 173:2261–7. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.38306

  • 13

    McCabeMJGaston-MassuetCGregoryLCAlatzoglouKSTziaferiVSbaiOet al. Variations inPROKR2, but NotPROK2, are associated with hypopituitarism and septo-optic dysplasia. J Clin Endocrinol Metab (2013) 98:E547–57. doi: 10.1210/jc.2012-3067

  • 14

    ReynaudRJayakodySAMonnierCSaveanuABouligandJGuedjAMet al. PROKR2 variants in multiple hypopituitarism with pituitary stalk interruption. J Clin Endocrinol Metab (2012) 97:E1068–73. doi: 10.1210/jc.2011-3056

  • 15

    JullienNSaveanuAVergierJMarquantEQuentienMHCastinettiFet al. Clinical lessons learned in constitutional hypopituitarism from two decades of experience in a large international cohort. Clin Endocrinol (2020) 94:277–89. doi: 10.1111/cen.14355

  • 16

    McCormackSELiDKimYJLeeJYKimSHRapaportRet al. Digenic inheritance of PROKR2 and WDR11 mutations in pituitary stalk interruption syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab (2017) 102:2501–7. doi: 10.1210/jc.2017-00332

  • 17

    RaivioTAvbeljMMcCabeMJRomeroCJDwyerAATommiskaJet al. Genetic overlap in kallmann syndrome, combined pituitary hormone deficiency, and septo-optic dysplasia. J Clin Endocrinol Metab (2012) 97:E694–9. doi: 10.1210/jc.2011-2938

  • 18

    FukamiMSuzukiEIzumiYToriiTNarumiSIgarashiMet al. Paradoxical gain-of-function mutant of the G-protein-coupled receptor PROKR2 promotes early puberty. J Cell Mol Med (2017) 21:2623–6. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.13146

  • 19

    SarfatiJGuiochon-MantelARondardPArnulfIGarcia-PinãeroAWolczynskiSet al. A comparative phenotypic study of kallmann syndrome patients carrying monoallelic and biallelic mutations in the prokineticin 2 or prokineticin receptor 2 genes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab (2010) 95:659–69. doi: 10.1210/jc.2009-0843

  • 20

    TopaloğluAK. Update on the genetics of idiopathic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol (2018) 9(Suppl 2):113–22. doi: 10.4274/jcrpe.2017.S010

  • 21

    CoxKHOliveiraLMBPlummerLCorbinBGardellaTBalasubramanianRet al. Modeling mutant/wild-type interactions to ascertain pathogenicity of PROKR2 missense variants in patients with isolated GnRH deficiency. Hum Mol Genet (2017) 27:338–50. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddx404

  • 22

    AlkelaiAOlenderTDodeCShushanSTatarskyyPFurman-HaranEet al. Next-generation sequencing of patients with congenital anosmia. Eur J Hum Genet (2017) 25:1377–87. doi: 10.1038/s41431-017-0014-1

  • 23

    GuWJZhangQWangYQYangGQHongTPZhuDLet al. Mutation analyses in pedigrees and sporadic cases of ethnic han Chinese kallmann syndrome patients. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) (2015) 240:1480–9. doi: 10.1177/1535370215587531

  • 24

    Moya-PlanaAVillanuevaCLaccourreyeOBonfilsPde RouxN. PROKR2 and PROK2 mutations cause isolated congenital anosmia without gonadotropic deficiency. Eur J Endocrinol (2013) 168:31–7. doi: 10.1530/EJE-12-0578

  • 25

    WenYZhangZLiZLiuGTaoGSongXet al. The PROK2/PROKR2 signaling pathway is required for the migration of most olfactory bulb interneurons. J Comp Neurol (2019) 527:2931–47. doi: 10.1002/cne.24719

  • 26

    AielloFCirilloGCassioADi MaseRTorneseGUmanoGRet al. Molecular screening of PROKR2 gene in girls with idiopathic central precocious puberty. Ital J Pediatr (2021) 47:5. doi: 10.1186/s13052-020-00951-z

  • 27

    KarczewskiKJFrancioliLCTiaoGCummingsBBAlföldiJWangQet al. The mutational constraint spectrum quantified from variation in 141,456 humans. Nature (2020) 581:434–43. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2308-7

  • 28

    AbreuAPTrarbachEBde CastroMFrade CostaEMVersianiBMatias BaptistaMTet al. Loss-of-Function mutations in the genes encoding prokineticin-2 or prokineticin receptor-2 cause autosomal recessive kallmann syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab (2008) 93:4113–8. doi: 10.1210/jc.2008-0958

  • 29

    Costa-BarbosaFABalasubramanianRKeefeKWShawNDAl-TassanNPlummerLet al. Prioritizing genetic testing in patients with kallmann syndrome using clinical phenotypes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab (2013) 98:E943–53. doi: 10.1210/jc.2012-4116

  • 30

    LiSZhaoYNieMYangYHaoMMaoJet al. Comparison of clinical characteristics and spermatogenesis in CHH patients caused by PROKR2 and FGFR1 mutations. Reprod Sci (2021) 28:3219–27. doi: 10.1007/s43032-021-00609-z

  • 31

    ColeLWSidisYZhangCQuintonRPlummerLPignatelliDet al. Mutations in prokineticin 2 and prokineticin receptor 2 genes in human gonadotrophin-releasing hormone deficiency: Molecular genetics and clinical spectrum. J Clin Endocrinol Metab (2008) 93:3551–9. doi: 10.1210/jc.2007-2654

  • 32

    CariboniAPimpinelliFColamarinoSZaninettiRPiccolellaMRumioCet al. The product of X-linked kallmann’s syndrome gene (KAL1) affects the migratory activity of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH)-producing neurons. Hum Mol Genet (2004) 13:2781–91. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddh309

  • 33

    OleariRMassaVCariboniALettieriA. The differential roles for neurodevelopmental and neuroendocrine genes in shaping GnRH neuron physiology and deficiency. IJMS (2021) 22:9425. doi: 10.3390/ijms22179425

  • 34

    VissersLELMvan RavenswaaijCMAAdmiraalRHurstJAde VriesBBAJanssenIMet al. Mutations in a new member of the chromodomain gene family cause CHARGE syndrome. Nat Genet (2004) 36:955–7. doi: 10.1038/ng1407

  • 35

    LaymanWSMcEwenDPBeyerLALalaniSRFernbachSDOhEet al. Defects in neural stem cell proliferation and olfaction in Chd7 deficient mice indicate a mechanism for hyposmia in human CHARGE syndrome. Hum Mol Genet (2009) 18:1909–23. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddp112

  • 36

    UfartesRSchwenty-LaraJFreeseLNeuhoferCMöllerJWehnerPet al. Sema3a plays a role in the pathogenesis of CHARGE syndrome. Hum Mol Genet (2018) 27:1343–52. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddy045

  • 37

    BudnyBZemojtelTKaluznaMGutPNiedzielaMObara-MoszynskaMet al. SEMA3A and IGSF10 are novel contributors to combined pituitary hormone deficiency (CPHD). Front Endocrinol (2020) 11. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2020.00368

  • 38

    WangYQinMFanLGongC. Correlation analysis of genotypes and phenotypes in Chinese Male pediatric patients with congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) (2022) 13:846801. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.846801

  • 39

    SunTXuWChenYNiuYWangTWangSet al. Reversal of idiopathic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism in a Chinese male cohort. Andrologia (2022) 54(11):e14583. doi: 10.1111/and.14583

  • 40

    SugisawaCTaniyamaMSatoTTakahashiYHasegawaTNarumiS. Biallelic PROKR2 variants and congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism: a case report and a literature review. Endocr J (2022) 69:831–8. doi: 10.1507/endocrj.EJ21-0779

  • 41

    LiuQYinXLiP. Clinical, hormonal, and genetic characteristics of 25 Chinese patients with idiopathic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. BMC Endocr Disord (2022) 22(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s12902-022-00940-9

  • 42

    ZhangLGaoYDuQLiuLLiYDeySKet al. Genetic profiles and three-year follow-up study of Chinese males with congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. J Sexual Med (2021) 18:1500–10. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2021.07.001

  • 43

    TangSYLiZZhangJZhuXBLiPLuJQet al. Whole exome sequencing and trio analysis to broaden the variant spectrum of genes in idiopathic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. Asian J Androl (2021) 23:288. doi: 10.4103/aja.aja_65_20

  • 44

    ZhaoYWuJJiaHWangXZhengRJiangFet al. PROKR2 mutations in idiopathic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism: Selective disruption of the binding to aGα-protein leads to biased signaling. FASEB J (2018) 33:4538–46. doi: 10.1096/fj.201801575R

  • 45

    KimJHSeoGHKimGHHuhJHwangITJangJHet al. Targeted gene panel sequencing for molecular diagnosis of kallmann syndrome and normosmic idiopathic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes (2018) 127:538–44. doi: 10.1055/a-0681-6608

  • 46

    ZhouCNiuYXuHLiZWangTYangWet al. Mutation profiles and clinical characteristics of Chinese males with isolated hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. Fertility Sterility (2018) 110:486–95.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.04.010

  • 47

    WangYGongCQinMLiuYTianY. Clinical and genetic features of 64 young male paediatric patients with congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. Clin Endocrinol (2017) 87:757–66. doi: 10.1111/cen.13451

  • 48

    HaJHLeeSKimYMoonJISeoJJangJHet al. Kallmann syndrome with a Tyr113His PROKR2 mutation. Medicine (2017) 96:e7974. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000007974

  • 49

    ShawNDSeminaraSBWeltCKAuMGPlummerLHughesVAet al. Expanding the phenotype and genotype of female GnRH deficiency. J Clin Endocrinol Metab (2011) 96:E566–76. doi: 10.1210/jc.2010-2292

  • 50

    YuanHDengSGaoWLiHYuanM. Identification of MMACHC and PROKR2 mutations causing coexistent cobalamin c disease and kallmann syndrome in a young woman. Metab Brain Dis (2021) 36:447–52. doi: 10.1007/s11011-020-00654-8

  • 51

    ZhangQHeHJanjuaMUWangFYangYMoZet al. Identification of two novel mutations in three Chinese families with kallmann syndrome using whole exome sequencing. Andrologia (2020) 52(7):e13594. doi: 10.1111/and.13594

  • 52

    TribalatM. Mariages «mixtes» et immigration en France. Eps (2009), 203–14. doi: 10.4000/eps.3657

  • 53

    LibriDVKleinauGVezzoliVBusnelliMGuizzardiFSinisiAAet al. Germline prokineticin receptor 2 (PROKR2) variants associated with central hypogonadism cause differential modulation of distinct intracellular pathways. J Clin Endocrinol Metab (2014) 99:E458–63. doi: 10.1210/jc.2013-2431

  • 54

    El-BrolosyMAKontarakisZRossiAKuenneCGüntherSFukudaNet al. Genetic compensation triggered by mutant mRNA degradation. Nature (2019) 568:193–7. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1064-z

  • 55

    MartinCBalasubramanianRDwyerAAAuMGSidisYKaiserUBet al. The role of the prokineticin 2 pathway in human reproduction: Evidence from the study of human and murine gene mutations. Endocrine Rev (2010) 32:225–46. doi: 10.1210/er.2010-0007

  • 56

    AbreuAPNoelSDXuSCarrollRSLatronicoACKaiserUB. Evidence of the importance of the first intracellular loop of prokineticin receptor 2 in receptor function. Mol Endocrinol (2012) 26:1417–27. doi: 10.1210/me.2012-1102

  • 57

    SbaiOMonnierCDodéCPinJHardelinJRondardP. Biased signaling through G-protein-coupled PROKR2 receptors harboring missense mutations. FASEB J (2014) 28:3734–44. doi: 10.1096/fj.13-243402

  • 58

    ZhouXTChenDNXieZQPengZXiaKDLiuHDet al. Functional analysis of the distal region of the third intracellular loop of PROKR2. Biochem Biophys Res Commun (2013) 439:12–7. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2013.08.039

  • 59

    PengZTangYLuoHJiangFYangJSunLet al. Disease-causing mutation in PKR2 receptor reveals a critical role of positive charges in the second intracellular loop for G-protein coupling and receptor trafficking. J Biol Chem (2011) 286:16615–22. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.223784

  • 60

    MonnierCDodéCFabreLTeixeiraLLabesseGPinJPet al. PROKR2 missense mutations associated with kallmann syndrome impair receptor signalling activity. Hum Mol Genet (2008) 18:75–81. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddn318

  • 61

    SuMTLinSHChenYCWuLWKuoPL. Prokineticin receptor variants (PKR1-I379V and PKR2-V331M) are protective genotypes in human early pregnancy. Reproduction (2013) 146:63–73. doi: 10.1530/REP-13-0043

  • 62

    BuccioniMMarucciGDal BenDGiacobbeDLambertucciCSoverchiaLet al. Innovative functional cAMP assay for studying G protein-coupled receptors: application to the pharmacological characterization of GPR17. Purinergic Signalling (2011) 7:463–8. doi: 10.1007/s11302-011-9245-8

  • 63

    ChenDNMaYTLiuHZhouQYLiJD. Functional rescue of kallmann syndrome-associated prokineticin receptor 2 (PKR2) mutants deficient in trafficking. J Biol Chem (2014) 289:15518–26. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.556381

  • 64

    Avbelj StefanijaMJeanpierreMSykiotisGPYoungJQuintonRAbreuAPet al. An ancient founder mutation in PROKR2 impairs human reproduction. Hum Mol Genet (2012) 21:4314–24. doi: 10.1093/hmg/dds264

Summary

Keywords

kallmann syndrome, hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, genetic diagnosis, pituitary, functional assay

Citation

Martinez-Mayer J and Perez-Millan MI (2023) Phenotypic and genotypic landscape of PROKR2 in neuroendocrine disorders. Front. Endocrinol. 14:1132787. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1132787

Received

27 December 2022

Accepted

25 January 2023

Published

08 February 2023

Volume

14 - 2023

Edited by

Frédéric Gachon, The University of Queensland, Australia

Reviewed by

Carol F Elias, University of Michigan, United States; Philippe Rondard, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), France

Updates

Copyright

© 2023 Martinez-Mayer and Perez-Millan.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Maria Ines Perez-Millan,

This article was submitted to Neuroendocrine Science, a section of the journal Frontiers in Endocrinology

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Share on WeChat

Scan with WeChat to share this article

Article metrics