ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Endocrinol., 15 August 2024

Sec. Endocrinology of Aging

Volume 15 - 2024 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2024.1403523

Nucleotide polymorphism-based study utilizes human plasma liposomes to discover potential therapeutic targets for intervertebral disc disease

  • 1. Department of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China

  • 2. The School of Clinical Medicine, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China

Abstract

Background:

While intervertebral disc degeneration (IVDD) is crucial in numerous spinally related illnesses and is common among the elderly, the complete understanding of its pathogenic mechanisms is still an area of ongoing study. In recent years, it has revealed that liposomes are crucial in the initiation and progression of IVDD. However, their intrinsic mediators and related mechanisms remain unclear. With the development of genomics, an increasing amount of data points to the contribution of genetics in the etiology of disease. Accordingly, this study explored the causality between liposomes and IVDD by Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis and deeply investigated the intermediary roles of undetected metabolites.

Methods:

According to MR analysis, 179 liposomes and 1400 metabolites were evaluated for their causal association with IVDD. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are strongly associated with the concentrations of liposomes and metabolites. Consequently, they were employed as instrumental variables (IVs) to deduce if they constituted risk elements or protective elements for IVDD. Furthermore, mediation analysis was conducted to pinpoint possible metabolic mediators that link liposomes to IVDD. The inverse variance weighting (IVW) was the main analytical technique. Various confidence tests in the causality estimates were performed, including consistency, heterogeneity, pleiotropy, and sensitivity analyses. Inverse MR analysis was also utilized to estimate potential reverse causality.

Results:

MR analysis identified 13 liposomes and 79 metabolites markedly relevant to IVDD. Moreover, the mediation analysis was carried out by choosing the liposome, specifically the triacylglycerol (48:2) levels, which were found to be most notably associated with an increased risk of IVDD. In all, three metabolite-associated mediators were identified (3-methylcytidine levels, inosine 5’-monophosphate (IMP) to phosphate ratio, and adenosine 5’-diphosphate (ADP) to glycine ratio).

Conclusion:

The analysis’s findings suggested possible causal connections between liposomes, metabolites, and IVDD, which could act as both forecast and prognosis clinical indicators, thereby aiding in the exploration of the pathogenesis behind IVDD.

Introduction

Lipid metabolism represents a complicated process for maintaining the body’s regular physiological functions. Disorders of lipid metabolism are linked to various human disorders, including cardiovascular and bone diseases (1). IVDD represents a degenerative condition that is notably widespread. As the proteoglycan and water within the nucleus pulposus (NP) gradually decrease, the intervertebral discs (IVD) between the vertebrae may rupture. Subsequently, the herniation of the NP exerts pressure on the spinal nerves, leading to a significant deterioration in the patient’s quality of life (2). Furthermore, IVDD is a primary contributor to numerous spine-related conditions, including spinal stenosis and chronic sciatica (3). As the global population ages rapidly, the prevalence of IVDD continues to be high, posing a significant challenge to both public health and socioeconomic development. Nevertheless, existing non-surgical therapies and surgical procedures alike have been found ineffective in reversing the condition of IVDD (4).

Lipid metabolism performs a crucial function in maintaining IVD stability. When lipid metabolic homeostasis is disturbed, the IVD microenvironment is impacted. Disorders of lipid metabolism are strongly associated with the development of IVDD (5). A retrospective clinical study involving 302 hospitalized patients demonstrated that age, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and triglycerides (TGs) can influence degeneration levels of patients with symptomatic degenerative lumbar spine without underlying disease (6). Another case-control study with 396 patients and 394 controls showed that abnormal blood lipids may be linked to higher risk of lumbar disc herniation (7). The excess mechanic load on the lumbar spine caused by excess weight due to disorders of lipid metabolism is a logical pathogenic explanation for IVDD (8). However, the presumption of obesity being associated with pain and degenerative disease as a result of joint overload contradicts the fact that non-weight-bearing joints present with similar degenerative disease and related pain (9). An annulus fibrosus (AF) with structural deterioration is intimately linked to IVDD. Unusual mechanical stress is a major factor in annulus fibrosus cell (AFC) apoptosis, which harms the AF structurally and aggravates IVDD (10), and the majority of scholars agree that obesity is a mechanical risk factor for IVDD (11, 12). Nonetheless, the literature indicates that there has been disagreement on its function (1315). It is not possible to attribute these observed disparities to the mechanical consequences of obesity alone. Obesity has not just mechanical impacts but also metabolic and inflammatory ones (16, 17). It is now acknowledged that adipose tissue is an active organ with a variety of metabolic and inflammatory characteristics. Adipokines, which function both locally and across the body’s circulation to reach distant regions and exert pro- or anti-inflammatory effects, are distinct and specialized proteins secreted by adipocytes (18). Obese adipose tissue produces systemic pro-inflammatory substances at a low level over an extended period of time, indicating that obesity-related chronic low-grade inflammation may play a significant role in IVDD. Thus, mechanistically, purely mechanical loading cannot explain the association between obesity and IVDD.

Other possible mechanisms beyond the impact of mechanical strain on the development of IVDD need further investigation. Plasma lipids are typically measured by HDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, TGs, and total cholesterol (TC); however, the versatility and range of circulating lipids have been much more understood because to the development of contemporary high-performance lipidomic methods. Lipid classes are more finely delineated and may improve risk assessment for IVDD compared with standard lipids (19). Ultimately, an improved knowledge of the biology of lipid metabolism and its link to the pathogenesis of IVDD could also lead to novel therapeutic options for IVDD.

Presently, the most convincing explanation for the relationship between elevated body fat and IVDD is the internal secretory function of fatty tissue. Obesity increases the impaired cellular metabolism of free fatty acids, which promotes the development of IVDD (1). As a competitive inhibitor of arachidonic acid (AA), eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) reduces inflammation by preventing the synthesis of lipoxygenase (LOX) and cyclooxygenase (CYC). In an alternative dietary control study, Napier et al. discovered that omega-3 fatty acids (n-3 FA) dietary supplementation lowers systemic inflammation and may even prevent the advancement of degenerative disc degeneration by lowering serum AA/EPA ratios. This was observed in a mice model of acupuncture-elicited IVDD (20). However, further exploration is needed to identify other possible metabolic factors linking liposomes to IVDD. The majority of existing research in this area has not conclusively established whether the liposomes examined have a direct causal connection to IVDD. Therefore, the search for IVDD-causing liposomes and the metabolite mediators that play an essential role between them could contribute to the mechanistic study of IVDD and it aids in making clinical judgments prior to the development of serious spinal conditions.

Luckily, the increasing attention on IVDD in the elderly population, genome-wide association study (GWAS) data related to IVDD has been concluded, uncovering genetic insights linked to the condition. Therefore, the possible causative relationship between liposomes, metabolites, and IVDD was assessed using MR techniques. A two-step MR approach was also used to identify possible metabolic mediators between liposomes and IVDD. As gametogenesis adheres to Mendel’s principles of inheritance, the distribution of parental genes to offspring occurs randomly in accordance with Mendelian genetics. Consequently, genetic types might not correlate with elements that affect the accuracy of observational research. MR techniques are capable of differentiating diseases from their underlying causes, thereby preventing the misinterpretation of causal relationships (21). Consequently, employing genetic variants associated with the target characteristic as IVs, MR emerges as a highly dependable analyzing technique that shows promise in determining exposure-outcome causality, eliminating confounding variables, measuring inaccuracies and correcting causal misinterpretations (2224). Furthermore, genetic variation must be extracted from exposure- and outcome-related information in order to use two-sample MR designs, which enhances the statistical strength in confirming causal relationships between exposures and outcomes (25, 26).

Materials and methods

Study design

This research utilized the TwosampleMR software package. SNPs act as genetic proxies for inferring the influence of exposures on outcomes. Three presumptions should be met by genetic tools in MR analysis: SNPs are linked to the exposures, they are not connected with confounding factors that could interfere with the causality between the exposures and the outcomes, and their relationship with the outcomes are mediated exclusively through the exposures.

Data sources

Summary statistics for liposomes (covering 4 major lipid categories: glycerolipids, glycerophospholipids, sphingolipids, and sterols) were obtained from a large-scale GWAS study by Linda Ottensmann and his team, which performed univariate and multivariate genome-wide analyses of 179 lipids from 7174 Finnish individuals. The GWAS catalog database provides access to the data for download (accession codes GCST90277238-GCST90277416) (19). Summary statistics for metabolites were obtained from a series of large GWASs study by Yiheng Chen and his team, which included 1091 metabolites and 309 metabolite ratios across 8299 participants. The GWAS catalog database provides access to the data for download (accession numbers from GCST90199621-90201020) (27). IVDD-related GWAS data from 184,683 subjects from European populations, including 20,001 IVDD cases and 164,682 controls, were sourced from the FinnGen repository, which contained a total of 16,380,337 SNPs.

The process of selecting instrumental variables involved

SNPs were incorporated based on achieving a threshold of genome-wide significance (P < 1 × 10-5). For the inverse MR analysis, the IV significance threshold for IVDD was defined as 5×10-8. To avoid strong linkage disequilibrium (LD), an LD threshold of r2 < 0.001 was established. Additionally, the selection was limited to SNPs with an F-value greater than 10 to minimize the risk of weak instrumental bias. (Supplementary Tables 1, 2; Table 1).

Table 1

SNPpval.exposurechr.exposurepos.exposuresamplesize.exposurebeta.exposurese.exposureid.exposureeffect_allele.exposureother_allele.exposureeaf.exposureexposureR2F
rs123088434.36E-0812239744041846830.06890.0126finn-b-M13_INTERVERTEBCG0.3103intervertebral disk degeneration0.002031938376.0243903
rs30100434.73E-091183942175184683-0.08360.0143finn-b-M13_INTERVERTEBGA0.7913intervertebral disk degeneration0.002308374427.2991764
rs31358409.27E-1041796539184683-0.08160.0133finn-b-M13_INTERVERTEBTA0.2631intervertebral disk degeneration0.002581902478.062514
rs41489463.00E-0810737700731846830.06470.0117finn-b-M13_INTERVERTEBTC0.554intervertebral disk degeneration0.002068632382.8289073
rs44734302.42E-08269582895184683-0.06510.0117finn-b-M13_INTERVERTEBTC0.5523intervertebral disk degeneration0.002095821387.8711576
rs620992303.27E-1118507217121846830.07850.0118finn-b-M13_INTERVERTEBAG0.404intervertebral disk degeneration0.002967542549.6798979
rs64707636.82E-098130720646184683-0.0920.0159finn-b-M13_INTERVERTEBCG0.1652intervertebral disk degeneration0.002334523432.1508852

Characteristics of significant SNPs for intervertebral disk degeneration on liposomes.

chr, chromosome; pos, position; beta, effect estimate; se, standard error of beta; eaf, effect allele frequency; R2, explained phenotypic variability; F, F statistic;

F = R2 (N − K − 1)/(K (1 − R2)); K, number of SNPs; N, sample size; R2, explained phenotypic variability.

Data analysis

Utilizing the IVW method can provide a reliable assessment of causal relationships between exposures and outcomes, provided that each genetic variant meets the instrumental variable criteria (28). The Egger and weighted median methods can yield trustworthy causal inferences for a range of genetic variants, utilizing pooled data and operating under more lenient conditions. Even if up to 50 percent the data comes from genetic variants that are null IVs, the weighted median estimation continues to deliver coherent causality assessments (29). Additionally, MR-Egger regression and the MR-pleiotropy residual sum and outlier methods were used to detect and correct for pleiotropy. MR-Egger regression techniques aggregate causal effect estimates from multiple individual variables to assess and adjust for potential pleiotropy imbalances (30). Weighted linear regression of genetic outcome data to genetic exposure data was the approach that MR-Egger used. The causal estimation is represented by the slope of the linear regression, while the interception reflects the average impact of multiplicative effects from genetic variations (31). The heterogeneity among SNP estimates was evaluated using the statistical measure known as Cochran’s Q (32). A P-value greater than 0.05 suggests that neither horizontal pleiotropy nor heterogeneity is present. Ultimately, a leave-one-out approach was applied to the sequential removal of each SNP in order to verify that none of the SNPs had a significant effect on the outcome.

Primary analysis

First, to determine the causality between liposomes and IVDD or metabolites and IVDD (Figure 1), two-sample MR analyses were used. The primary analytical technique employed was the IVW technique. Additionally, validation was conducted using MR Egger, weighted median, simple mode, and weighted mode methods (33).

Figure 1

Mediation analysis

Mediation analysis represents a novel technique for ascertaining if a variable mediates between two variables, which enables the construction of pathways from exposure factors to outcomes through mediators, aiding in the elucidation of the mechanisms through which exposure factors affect outcomes (34). For instance, both liposomes and metabolites have a significant causal impact on IVDD, with the liposome additionally having a significant causal effect on the metabolites. This setup establishes a triangular interaction where liposomes act as the exposure, metabolites serve as the mediator, and IVDD represents the outcome. The subsequent equation was applied: Mediation ratio = c × d/a. The total influence of liposomes on IVDD is dissected into two components: the immediate effect of liposomes on IVDD and the indirect influence mediated by the metabolites. The subsequent steps determine the percentage of mediating effect: initially, the impact of liposomes on metabolites is calculated to derive the value ‘c’; the next step involves computing the influence of metabolites on IVDD to ascertain the value ‘d’. The mediation impact percentage is subsequently determined by division of the indirect impact (c × d) by the total impact of liposomes on IVDD (a). (Figure 1). A larger percent of mediating impacts suggests that a greater portion of liposome impacts on IVDD are mediated through metabolites.

Statistical analysis

This study was executed using R version 4.3.1. The “Forestploter” package was leveraged to create forest plots. Additionally, the “MRPRESSO” package was used for detecting outlier.

Results

MR analysis results of liposomes and IVDD

MR analysis showed a total of 13 liposomes were identified as significantly associated with IVDD, of which seven liposomes were risk factors, including diacylglycerol (18:1_18:3) levels, phosphatidylcholine (16:0_18:3) levels, and triacylglycerol (48:2) levels, etc. And six liposomes as protective factors, including phosphatidylcholine (14:0_16:0) levels, phosphatidylcholine (16:0_20:4) levels, sphingomyelin (d36:2) levels, etc (Table 2). Reverse MR analysis revealed a significant link between IVDD and one liposome phosphatidylcholine (O-16:0_20:3) levels (Table 3).

Table 2

ExposureOutcomeMethodNSNPsPvalblo_ciup_ciOROR_lci95OR_uci95
Sterol ester (27:1/22:6) levelsIntervertebral Disk DegenerationMR Egger230.449785537-0.047918711-0.1698690350.0740316130.9532112690.8437753141.076840847
Weighted median230.071462172-0.068663623-0.1433257670.0059985210.9336406830.8664717551.006016548
Inverse variance weighted230.024567029-0.059510025-0.111392674-0.0076273760.9422260870.8945873990.992401638
Simple mode230.7887147820.020895484-0.1300817780.1718727461.0211153230.8780236251.187526706
Weighted mode230.7849090720.014280159-0.0870255460.1155858651.0143826080.9166536781.122530897
Diacylglycerol (18:1_18:3) levelsIntervertebral Disk DegenerationMR Egger220.8410756810.015365138-0.1328834020.1636136781.0154837890.8755671761.177759233
Weighted median220.078571650.074216924-0.0084791070.1569129541.0770404160.9915567391.169893775
Inverse variance weighted220.027439910.0651943120.0072491260.1231394981.0673664061.0072754641.131042188
Simple mode220.1858070590.110986349-0.0480418910.2700145881.1173796530.953093861.309983561
Weighted mode220.2238581780.092987508-0.0524286170.2384036331.0974480260.9489220551.26922139
Phosphatidylcholine (14:0_16:0) levelsIntervertebral Disk DegenerationMR Egger190.3449112440.072019423-0.0732768730.2173157181.0746762170.9293434841.242736395
Weighted median190.15065017-0.063622919-0.1503871540.0231413170.938358770.8603748141.023411155
Inverse variance weighted190.0413156-0.066602776-0.130582739-0.0026228120.9355667570.8775838790.997380624
Simple mode190.434014701-0.06381949-0.2201330060.0924940260.9381743340.8024120651.096906588
Weighted mode190.469025493-0.060081911-0.2192842190.0991203960.9416873960.8030934311.104199233
Phosphatidylcholine (16:0_18:3) levelsIntervertebral Disk DegenerationMR Egger230.65448655-0.034564452-0.1837856260.1146567210.9660260750.8321141691.121488388
Weighted median230.1027879310.074942969-0.0150904550.1649763921.0778226790.9850228361.179365276
Inverse variance weighted230.0444394150.0645858680.0016041790.1275675571.0667171711.0016054661.136061614
Simple mode230.4292408790.084285661-0.1208443480.289415671.0879396310.8861718831.335646802
Weighted mode230.3254290040.095755788-0.0908362010.2823477781.1004902790.9131672741.326239877
Phosphatidylcholine (16:0_20:4) levelsIntervertebral Disk DegenerationMR Egger240.13013339-0.03852322-0.0865429360.0094964970.9622093620.9170961721.009541732
Weighted median240.076560629-0.033951334-0.0715259240.0036232560.9666185450.9309721431.003629828
Inverse variance weighted240.045960097-0.032517712-0.064452779-0.0005826450.9680053040.9375803860.999417524
Simple mode240.42878099-0.043796607-0.1503657090.0627724950.9571486150.8603932651.064784568
Weighted mode240.098841262-0.034922513-0.0747153210.0048702940.9656802410.9280076331.004882173
Phosphatidylcholine (O-16:0_20:3) levelsIntervertebral Disk DegenerationMR Egger160.0061265840.2252487380.0882923390.3622051361.2526342551.09230741.436493588
Weighted median160.0719590180.078474876-0.0070051160.1639548671.0816361790.9930193631.17816114
Inverse variance weighted160.005540030.0854755580.0250782080.1458729081.0892349381.0253953121.157049127
Simple mode160.906793308-0.008657073-0.1511501740.1338360280.9913802920.8597185811.143205351
Weighted mode160.0613094120.1131192750.0035057340.2227328161.1197654851.0035118861.249486686
Sphingomyelin (d36:2) levelsIntervertebral Disk DegenerationMR Egger240.338868311-0.060504388-0.1818019680.0607931930.9412896390.8337664361.062679122
Weighted median240.140066187-0.056237842-0.1309398670.0184641840.9453142740.8772705261.018635701
Inverse variance weighted240.000287281-0.096690669-0.148948581-0.0444327560.9078367850.8616134170.95653992
Simple mode240.626967934-0.032987251-0.1642409520.0982664490.9675508940.848537541.103256708
Weighted mode240.393496455-0.042730452-0.1390394830.053578580.9581696280.870193671.055039894
Sphingomyelin (d38:2) levelsIntervertebral Disk DegenerationMR Egger310.31898261-0.051546411-0.1511854130.0480925920.949759570.8596882861.049267804
Weighted median310.421373415-0.025968804-0.0892726280.0373350190.9743654850.9145961951.038040726
Inverse variance weighted310.019611113-0.055288302-0.101723056-0.0088535480.9462123140.9032796750.99118553
Simple mode310.478609316-0.046957-0.1752278970.0813138970.9541284240.8392657331.084711331
Weighted mode310.631878214-0.019380057-0.0978561530.0590960380.9808065290.9067793321.060877121
Sphingomyelin (d42:2) levelsIntervertebral Disk DegenerationMR Egger380.848554686-0.00869274-0.0972730150.0798875350.9913449330.9073082641.083165243
Weighted median380.46398265-0.023707876-0.0871615730.0397458210.9765709480.9165289971.040546256
Inverse variance weighted380.041817716-0.048205232-0.09462634-0.0017841250.9529381930.9097127940.998217466
Simple mode380.5269322090.050081762-0.1035983080.2037618331.0513570540.9015873851.226006124
Weighted mode380.291591260.055920661-0.0465223230.1583636461.0575137790.9545432521.171592162
Triacylglycerol (48:2) levelsIntervertebral Disk DegenerationMR Egger240.1060483610.120252422-0.0195939050.260098751.1277814930.9805968081.297058165
Weighted median240.0458823510.08470360.0015474690.167859731.0883944181.0015486671.182770692
Inverse variance weighted240.0061143980.0799099120.0227810750.1370387491.0831894811.0230425461.146872587
Simple mode240.4058683260.062287543-0.0818943570.2064694431.0642683230.921369291.229330168
Weighted mode240.2598205070.07639007-0.053205480.205985621.0793835270.948185161.228735535
Triacylglycerol (49:1) levelsIntervertebral Disk DegenerationMR Egger250.6095628490.035242725-0.0981671240.1686525741.035871110.9064973941.183708816
Weighted median250.0223371690.0893140870.0126894030.1659387721.0934240331.0127702551.18050082
Inverse variance weighted250.0313127090.0638764760.0057280890.1220248621.0659607191.0057445261.12978219
Simple mode250.1616968620.120719681-0.0431500230.2845893861.1283085820.9577676921.329216121
Weighted mode250.1490278850.115098697-0.0362198910.2664172841.1219841680.9644282011.305279617
Triacylglycerol (49:2) levelsIntervertebral Disk DegenerationMR Egger170.784613378-0.020314298-0.1634046040.1227760090.9798906470.849247511.130631141
Weighted median170.1223900380.068273563-0.0183489990.1548961251.0706581610.9818183191.167536677
Inverse variance weighted170.0327301040.068169720.0055987750.1307406641.0705469861.0056144781.139672185
Simple mode170.746137719-0.027341979-0.1900402740.1353563170.9730284290.8269258291.144944674
Weighted mode170.4220514730.068284207-0.094138720.2307071341.0706695570.9101564961.259490323
Triacylglycerol (54:3) levelsIntervertebral Disk DegenerationMR Egger300.81516397-0.014103229-0.1312404620.1030340040.9859957560.8770068621.108529103
Weighted median300.2370560750.042949496-0.0282469160.1141459091.0438851740.9721482981.120915664
Inverse variance weighted300.0067169640.064325230.0178118020.1108386591.0664391811.0179713781.117214639
Simple mode300.3092265050.06141828-0.0548915890.1777281491.0633435960.9465877631.194500551
Weighted mode300.2966792680.048860784-0.0412544130.1389759811.0500741530.9595849681.1490965

Causal effects of liposomes on intervertebral disk degeneration.

SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism; b, beta; OR, odds ratio; ci, confidence interval.

Table 3

ExposureOutcomeMethodNSNPsPvalblo_ciup_ciOROR_lci95OR_uci95
Intervertebral Disk DegenerationSterol ester (27:1/22:6) levelsMR Egger70.754386290.355622052-1.7530459732.4642900761.4270680880.17324543811.75513394
Weighted median70.568488660.076991805-0.1876225450.3416061541.0800332250.8289275311.407205967
Inverse variance weighted70.765328340.035977287-0.20026250.2722170741.0366323010.8185158651.31287196
Simple mode70.3194368110.222054462-0.1789458820.6230548071.248639380.8361511491.864615391
Weighted mode70.3165981130.222054462-0.1763868770.6204958011.248639380.8382936041.85984993
Intervertebral Disk DegenerationDiacylglycerol (18:1_18:3) levelsMR Egger70.887155052-0.119014374-1.6814682911.4434395430.8877950390.1861005264.235238077
Weighted median70.815735958-0.027831732-0.2619198140.206256350.9725520020.769572731.229068235
Inverse variance weighted70.893042084-0.01304125-0.2031470840.1770645830.9870434180.8161581891.193708184
Simple mode70.692219217-0.068799095-0.3933310460.2557328560.9335142090.6748053191.29140769
Weighted mode70.693054774-0.065876632-0.3775269720.2457737090.936246360.685554711.278610202
Intervertebral Disk DegenerationPhosphatidylcholine (14:0_16:0) levelsMR Egger70.953785586-0.053070149-1.7606091581.654468860.9483134870.1719400935.230301161
Weighted median70.889735629-0.018726564-0.2834726640.2460195360.9814476890.753163711.278924559
Inverse variance weighted70.731256690.036398508-0.1713178260.2441148411.0370690440.8425537451.276490916
Simple mode70.869726294-0.035166857-0.437878220.3675445070.9654443120.6454043751.444184073
Weighted mode70.869027016-0.035166857-0.4357034440.3653697310.9654443120.6468095121.44104671
Intervertebral Disk DegenerationPhosphatidylcholine (16:0_18:3) levelsMR Egger70.953824162-0.046426814-1.5414654171.448611790.9546344240.2140671744.257200524
Weighted median70.996580474-0.000511994-0.234661840.2336378510.9994881370.7908382351.263186948
Inverse variance weighted70.5932094750.049549041-0.1322513660.2313494481.0507971230.876120741.260299572
Simple mode70.973655695-0.006133805-0.355374560.3431069490.9938849680.7009108611.409319479
Weighted mode70.950277199-0.011403369-0.3552007930.3323940540.9886614030.7010326671.39430217
Intervertebral Disk DegenerationPhosphatidylcholine (16:0_20:4) levelsMR Egger70.406708715-0.687933907-2.1769742470.8011064320.5026134430.1133840842.228004701
Weighted median70.9414118150.008830679-0.2266684630.244329821.0088697840.7971850351.276765364
Inverse variance weighted70.745134751-0.03004461-0.2112026050.1511133850.9704022430.8096100191.163128532
Simple mode70.962231631-0.009070613-0.3692214410.3510802150.9909704010.6912723171.420601275
Weighted mode70.906443483-0.020264974-0.3442965220.3037665750.9799389810.7087187461.35495274
Intervertebral Disk DegenerationPhosphatidylcholine (O-16:0_20:3) levelsMR Egger70.1533660021.35436911-0.22370982.9324480193.8743159170.7995471318.77353225
Weighted median70.7480058220.045218361-0.2306492870.3210860081.0462562960.794017891.378624148
Inverse variance weighted70.0423545490.2150204910.0074165020.422624481.2398873041.0074440731.52596116
Simple mode70.9992949730.000179233-0.3812325340.3815911.0001792490.6830190461.464612936
Weighted mode70.991765442-0.002245968-0.4114456430.4069537060.9977565520.6626915421.50223456
Intervertebral Disk DegenerationSphingomyelin (d36:2) levelsMR Egger70.3953896680.708347613-0.785650922.2023461472.0306330940.4558229019.046212364
Weighted median70.0924341210.204651166-0.033726110.4430284421.2270969380.9668362761.55741663
Inverse variance weighted70.1139908870.146529479-0.0351829990.3282419561.1578090610.9654287281.388524894
Simple mode70.279131750.209714989-0.1358084590.5552384371.2333264980.8730098331.742356378
Weighted mode70.2514749380.209714989-0.1142176650.5336476431.2333264980.8920637641.705140723
Intervertebral Disk DegenerationSphingomyelin (d38:2) levelsMR Egger70.3408959840.974630734-0.8409514312.7902128982.6501884050.43129997616.28448637
Weighted median70.1147011050.197206362-0.0478309780.4422437031.2179953630.9532949011.556194943
Inverse variance weighted70.1808694830.148357295-0.0689538620.3656684521.1599272580.9333697421.441477245
Simple mode70.2158332680.272555302-0.1136188230.6587294281.3133160860.8925981291.932335602
Weighted mode70.1845891650.257195459-0.079148470.5935393871.2932978880.9239027431.810384742
Intervertebral Disk DegenerationSphingomyelin (d42:2) levelsMR Egger70.1129125041.609408246-0.0334337913.2522502844.9998516720.96711894125.84844084
Weighted median70.23322856-0.165188771-0.4367888960.1064113550.8477336620.6461078131.112279324
Inverse variance weighted70.8605402510.021496652-0.2183250760.2613183791.0217293690.8038640821.29864106
Simple mode70.364609067-0.212175094-0.6362174710.2118672840.8088230650.52929071.235983839
Weighted mode70.327264034-0.202838929-0.5756509130.1699730560.8164097310.5623387161.185272915
Intervertebral Disk DegenerationTriacylglycerol (48:2) levelsMR Egger70.8711526480.132207745-1.3858233921.6502388831.1413454040.250117775.208223835
Weighted median70.285134056-0.138528874-0.3925540270.1154962790.8706381120.6753298591.122430338
Inverse variance weighted70.246904614-0.108194471-0.291337280.0749483380.8974530510.7472635981.077828467
Simple mode70.329468803-0.213719568-0.608481830.1810426940.8075748230.5441763951.198466346
Weighted mode70.32222399-0.210902956-0.5941644830.1723585720.8098526550.5520235991.188103777
Intervertebral Disk DegenerationTriacylglycerol (49:1) levelsMR Egger70.876784406-0.202256275-2.6319561722.2274436220.8168855540.0719376029.276122472
Weighted median70.131633512-0.229029429-0.5267678540.0687089960.7953051280.5905105051.071124462
Inverse variance weighted70.11680968-0.215895238-0.4857115880.0539211130.8058197170.615259231.055401341
Simple mode70.785095877-0.067908711-0.5346382640.3988208420.9343457650.5858811861.490066638
Weighted mode70.552594835-0.143536007-0.5908802520.3038082380.8662896070.5538395521.355009192
Intervertebral Disk DegenerationTriacylglycerol (49:2) levelsMR Egger70.584537602-0.54906529-2.3916365151.2935059340.5774893430.0914798533.64554522
Weighted median70.200247147-0.177665526-0.4495357990.0942047480.8372224060.6379242081.098784697
Inverse variance weighted70.494801408-0.073128284-0.2830786130.1368220460.9294815850.7534605541.146624083
Simple mode70.5874537-0.124033975-0.5482964110.3002284610.8833498280.5779335331.350167233
Weighted mode70.510179592-0.135525716-0.5150314760.2439800440.8732567060.5974817881.27631886
Intervertebral Disk DegenerationTriacylglycerol (54:3) levelsMR Egger70.4665649030.753155579-1.120935252.6272464072.1236909280.32597478413.83561974
Weighted median70.8140446-0.031118077-0.2904227320.2281865780.9693611070.747947321.256319706
Inverse variance weighted70.8832455720.016505837-0.2037875790.2367992531.0166428110.8156356111.267186708
Simple mode70.987453812-0.002922126-0.3523408920.3464966390.9970821390.703040421.414104741
Weighted mode70.895409862-0.024522732-0.3750126520.3259671890.9757755080.6872805831.385369913

Causal effects of intervertebral disk degeneration on liposomes.

SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism; b, beta; OR, odds ratio; ci, confidence interval.

MR analysis results of metabolite and IVDD

In the two-sample MR analysis, a total of 79 metabolites were found to be significantly linked to IVDD. Among these, 40 were identified as risk factors, such as N6-carbamoylthreonyladenosine levels, 2-hydroxy-3-methylvalerate levels, N-methyltaurine levels, 2-hydroxydecanoate levels, etc. Conversely, the remaining 39 metabolites were recognized as protective factors, including glucose to mannitol to sorbitol ratio, proline to trans-4-hydroxyproline ratio, mannose to mannitol to sorbitol ratio, etc (Supplementary Table 3).

Findings from the mediation MR analysis

To explore how liposomes might be involved in the development of IVDD, we conducted a mediation analysis using MR, with metabolites serving as the mediating factors between liposomes and IVDD. Three distinct mediating associations were discovered. Triacylglycerol (48:2) levels influence IVDD risk via the three metabolites, with the mediation via the ADP to glycine ratio being consistent with the overall effect, with a mediating effect percentage of 7.13%. In contrast, the mediating effects of 3-methylcytidine levels and IMP to phosphate ratio were opposite to the overall impact (Figure 2).

Figure 2

Sensitivity analysis

Sensitivity analyses revealed some MR findings were heterogeneous (Tables 4, 5; Supplementary Table 4). The heterogeneity arises from the intrinsic nature of MR (35). When a gene is located on the same chromosome, it exhibits correlation without adhering to patterns of genetic independence in variation. Furthermore, IVs derived from various unit of analysis, studies, populations, etc., are probably displaying heterogeneity, which can impact the outcomes of MR analyses. The pleiotropy assessment disclosed instances of horizontal pleiotropy among certain liposomes and metabolites in relation to IVDD analysis (Tables 4, 5; Supplementary Table 4). This suggests that segments of the IVs influence the outcomes through additional factors. However, the existing methodologies do not facilitate a comprehensive examination of the specific traits of every SNP. Consequently, we incorporated only those liposomes and metabolites that cleared the pleiotropy test in the following intermediary analysis (Table 6). Thus, the findings of this study maintain a high level of credibility. The leave-one-out test also indicated the reliability of the results (Supplementary Figures S1S3).

Table 4

ExposureOutcomeHeterogeneity testHorizontal pleiotropic test
MethodQQ_dfQ_pvalegger_interceptSEp-value
Sterol ester (27:1/22:6) levelsIntervertebral disk degenerationMR Egger13.89077819210.874244879-0.0018873750.0091684160.838885853
Inverse variance weighted13.93315494220.903834646
Diacylglycerol (18:1_18:3) levelsIntervertebral disk degenerationMR Egger19.00932533200.5212199390.00742440.0103731650.482430598
Inverse variance weighted19.52159682210.551717965
Phosphatidylcholine (14:0_16:0) levelsIntervertebral disk degenerationMR Egger16.44131439170.492793193-0.0221635330.0108043650.055969753
Inverse variance weighted20.64935046180.297471342
Phosphatidylcholine (16:0_18:3) levelsIntervertebral disk degenerationMR Egger23.70408013210.3076164850.0131872970.009224770.167554406
Inverse variance weighted26.01085003220.251216472
Phosphatidylcholine (16:0_20:4) levelsIntervertebral disk degenerationMR Egger10.45134115220.981730240.0017905910.00545530.745841599
Inverse variance weighted10.55907582230.987252964
Phosphatidylcholine (O-16:0_20:3) levelsIntervertebral disk degenerationMR Egger6.128808613140.963139607-0.0203309830.0091221960.042731161
Inverse variance weighted11.09608043150.745754117
Sphingomyelin (d36:2) levelsIntervertebral disk degenerationMR Egger23.96836866220.348889671-0.0061000610.0093869350.52252004
Inverse variance weighted24.42845199230.38041063
Sphingomyelin (d38:2) levelsIntervertebral disk degenerationMR Egger38.53365869290.110920823-0.0007030160.0084101770.933955877
Inverse variance weighted38.54294328300.136301808
Sphingomyelin (d42:2) levelsIntervertebral disk degenerationMR Egger46.43768482360.114116701-0.0061885930.006030240.311615738
Inverse variance weighted47.79625709370.11006855
Triacylglycerol (48:2) levelsIntervertebral disk degenerationMR Egger23.62189526220.367356244-0.005795350.0093297170.540870407
Inverse variance weighted24.03619477230.401806434
Triacylglycerol (49:1) levelsIntervertebral disk degenerationMR Egger28.53886612230.1960878880.0046484150.0099058150.643300952
Inverse variance weighted28.81210226240.227282638
Triacylglycerol (49:2) levelsIntervertebral disk degenerationMR Egger13.1641753150.5896187020.0137990660.0102389450.197757538
Inverse variance weighted14.98048125160.526068579
Triacylglycerol (54:3) levelsIntervertebral disk degenerationMR Egger22.47005984280.7590789830.0105110950.0073511050.163819813
Inverse variance weighted24.5145764290.703173206

The result of heterogeneity and horizontal pleiotropic test of liposomes on intervertebral disk degeneration.

SE, standard error; df, degrees of freedom.

Table 5

ExposureOutcomeHeterogeneity testHorizontal pleiotropic test
MethodQQ_dfQ_pvalegger_interceptSEp-value
Intervertebral disk degenerationSterol ester (27:1/22:6) levelsMR Egger9.95075490550.07664267-0.0242119470.0808867250.776730161
Inverse variance weighted10.1290711760.119320733
Intervertebral disk degenerationDiacylglycerol (18:1_18:3) levelsMR Egger1.21962528250.9429807850.0080273620.0599362510.898680519
Inverse variance weighted1.23756297260.974988725
Intervertebral disk degenerationPhosphatidylcholine (14:0_16:0) levelsMR Egger3.19263997450.6703141850.0067777590.0655077090.921615696
Inverse variance weighted3.20334499160.782926181
Intervertebral disk degenerationPhosphatidylcholine (16:0_18:3) levelsMR Egger3.77716747550.5819233270.0072699910.0573499750.904066159
Inverse variance weighted3.79323693360.704633188
Intervertebral disk degenerationPhosphatidylcholine (16:0_20:4) levelsMR Egger3.6400198550.6023146820.0498324060.0571177810.422873204
Inverse variance weighted4.40118879660.62255437
Intervertebral disk degenerationPhosphatidylcholine (O-16:0_20:3) levelsMR Egger5.1851789850.393701438-0.0862973920.0605317780.213293655
Inverse variance weighted7.29294416460.294603443
Intervertebral disk degenerationSphingomyelin (d36:2) levelsMR Egger1.99804720850.849415176-0.0425564380.0573095840.491132851
Inverse variance weighted2.54945895460.862891874
Intervertebral disk degenerationSphingomyelin (d38:2) levelsMR Egger7.37442597650.194249446-0.0625918360.069649140.410013475
Inverse variance weighted8.56556399160.199524505
Intervertebral disk degenerationSphingomyelin (d42:2) levelsMR Egger6.05646280650.300763556-0.1202856260.063021790.114586655
Inverse variance weighted10.469067860.106238189
Intervertebral disk degenerationTriacylglycerol (48:2) levelsMR Egger5.08160101750.406002948-0.0182112790.0582358460.767118836
Inverse variance weighted5.18098826860.520818582
Intervertebral disk degenerationTriacylglycerol (49:1) levelsMR Egger10.8062087950.055360595-0.0010337730.0932616630.991584589
Inverse variance weighted10.8064743460.094544912
Intervertebral disk degenerationTriacylglycerol (49:2) levelsMR Egger6.41494211950.267910020.0360515820.0706810850.6317203
Inverse variance weighted6.74872571760.344711329
Intervertebral disk degenerationTriacylglycerol (54:3) levelsMR Egger7.85753425350.164263946-0.0557989190.0718889290.472740603
Inverse variance weighted8.8043027960.184886754

The result of heterogeneity and horizontal pleiotropic test of intervertebral disk degeneration on liposomes.

SE, standard error; df, degrees of freedom.

Table 6

ExposureOutcomeHeterogeneity testHorizontal pleiotropic test
methodQQ_dfQ_pvalegger_interceptsepval
Triacylglycerol (48:2) levels3-methylcytidine levelsMR Egger20.78798429210.471955826-0.0096636910.0110399150.391290569
Inverse variance weighted21.55420628220.486750455
3-methylcytidine levelsIntervertebral disk degenerationMR Egger25.11094167170.092253799-0.0111248710.006658530.11307325
Inverse variance weighted29.23426484180.045590109
Triacylglycerol (48:2) levelsIntervertebral disk degenerationMR Egger23.62189526220.367356244-0.005795350.0093297170.540870407
Inverse variance weighted24.03619477230.401806434
Triacylglycerol (48:2) levelsInosine 5'-monophosphate (IMP) to phosphate ratioMR Egger22.98822365210.344606628-0.0053995420.0162422710.742854387
Inverse variance weighted23.10920167220.395585397
Inosine 5'-monophosphate (IMP) to phosphate ratioIntervertebral disk degenerationMR Egger8.276801264180.974224776-0.0015984750.0098066160.872334745
Inverse variance weighted8.303370154190.983349345
Triacylglycerol (48:2) levelsIntervertebral disk degenerationMR Egger23.62189526220.367356244-0.005795350.0093297170.540870407
Inverse variance weighted24.03619477230.401806434
Triacylglycerol (48:2) levelsAdenosine 5'-diphosphate (ADP) to glycine ratioMR Egger16.4029829210.74659883-0.0020647120.0157755050.897115267
Inverse variance weighted16.42011271220.794502667
Adenosine 5'-diphosphate (ADP) to glycine ratioIntervertebral disk degenerationMR Egger31.42489672240.141905562-0.0009123310.0085347010.915759523
Inverse variance weighted31.43985876250.174864771
Triacylglycerol (48:2) levelsIntervertebral disk degenerationMR Egger23.62189526220.367356244-0.005795350.0093297170.540870407
Inverse variance weighted24.03619477230.401806434

The result of heterogeneity and horizontal pleiotropic test of 3 mediated relationships.

SE, standard error; df, degrees of freedom.

Discussion

This research explored the causality between liposomes, metabolites, and the risk of IVDD through MR analysis. We identified 13 liposomes (diacylglycerol (18:1_18:3) levels, phosphatidylcholine (14:0_16:0) levels, triacylglycerol (48:2) levels, etc.) and 79 metabolites (α-hydroxyisocaproic acid levels, butyrylpropionic acid levels, N-methyltaurine levels, etc.) might be linked to IVDD risk. Mediation analyses showed that triacylglycerol (48:2) levels could influence IVDD risk through three metabolites (3-methylcytidine levels, IMP to phosphate ratio, ADP to glycine ratio).

IVD is an avascular soft tissue structure situated in the intervertebral space. It is made up of the cartilaginous endplate, AF, and NP. IVDD, one of the most prevalent health issues worldwide, is considered to be a critical factor contributing to back and neck problems (36). Reduced levels of HDL and increased levels of TGs and LDL are the hallmarks of dyslipidemia. Lipid metabolism displays critical physiological functions in our body. Disorders of lipid metabolism can lead to obesity, hyperlipidemia, and hypercholesterolemia (37). A large-scale early cohort study involving 928 participants in the Wakayama Spine Study has revealed a possible link between disorders of lipid metabolism and IVDD (5). Zhang et al. found that clinically, age, BMI, and serum TGs were increased in the IVDD group by comparing IVDD grades with obesity-related elements in 128 volunteers and even once age and BMI are taken into account, TGs remain a significant risk factor for IVDD (38). Moreover, cell culture studies revealed that hypertriglyceridemia mediates disc cell apoptosis and matrix catabolism mainly through the MAPK signaling pathway, especially the ERK pathway (38). One of the risk factors for atherosclerosis is elevated blood TC. The four pairs of lumbar arteries and the central sacral artery are among the branch arteries of the abdominal aorta that may become blocked by atherosclerosis, which supplies blood to the lumbar spine. This obstruction further affects the blood supply to the IVD (39). Kauppila et al. found that advanced atherosclerotic manifestations of the aorta, particularly narrowing of the segmental arterial foramina above and below the IVDs, were associated with elevated IVDD grades, as assessed by routine autopsy of 86 lumbosacral spinal plain films and the corresponding abdominal aorta (39). The segmental arterioles’ stenosis was associated with elevated IVDD grades (40). High TGs play an essential function in IVDD development. Nevertheless, the underlying mechanisms still need to be completed. It is exciting that the present MR analysis identified three possible intermediary factors between TGs and IVDD.

IMP is a purine nucleotide essential to living organisms and enables animals to perceive fresh flavors (4143). Zhang et al. found that oral administration of IMP to mice promoted the exogenous fatty acid uptake and conversion to TGs and enhanced the phosphorylation of liver IMP-activated protein kinase, resulting in adipose tissue hyperplasia (44). Obesity and being overweight are risk factors for lumbar radiculopathy and sciatica in both men and women, with a dose-response relationship, according to a meta-analysis that included data from 26 clinical investigations (45). Likewise, comparable findings were obtained by a recent meta-analysis that included ten cohort studies (46). This is consistent with our results. The results of the present mediated MR analysis suggest that TG levels cause a decrease in the IMP to phosphate ratio, which may be related to the negative feedback regulation caused by IMP facilitating the uptake and conversion of exogenous fatty acids to TGs.

ADP is an important signaling molecule that mediates various responses in cardiovascular, nervous, and other systems. Besides normal physiological processes, purinergic signaling facilitates numerous pathophysiological procedures, ranging from cell multiplication, polarization, cell motility, apoptosis, necrosis, vessel reshaping, and acute and chronic inflammation (47). Inflammation is strongly associated with the formation of thrombi, and platelets are vital mediators. ATP and ADP signaling have a crucial function in platelet activation. ADP triggers platelet aggregation via activation of P2Y1 and P2Y12 (48). Platelet activation and aggregation facilitate the attenuation of vascular rupture and bleeding in localized inflammatory areas, alleviating the ischemic and hypoxic conditions of tissues. Extracellular adenosine is also known as a “safety signal,” which inhibits the hypoxia-induced inflammatory response in ischemia and reperfusion (49). The conversion of extracellular ATP to adenosine is core to attenuating aseptic inflammation during ischemia/reperfusion injury. Experimental studies have shown that increasing the ATP catabolism to adenosine effectively attenuates tissue damage and aseptic inflammation in ischemia and reperfusion (50, 51).

Furthermore, some experimental studies have demonstrated the protective effects of adenosine signaling in ischemia and reperfusion models, e.g., adenosine or its analogs decrease the releasing of harmful oxidative metabolites from neutrophils after occupying specific receptors on neutrophils (52). Grenz et al. performed repetitive and nontraumatic occlusion of renal arteries in each adenosine receptor gene-targeted mouse. Then, Renal vascular A2B adenosine receptors protect the kidney against ischemia, as shown by measurements of certain parameters of renal function (53). The branches of the lumbar arteries, which begin at the base of the abdominal aorta, sustain the corpus lumborum. Nevertheless, arterial sclerosis usually occurs first in the lowest branches, leading to stenosis or occlusion of the lumbar artery segments (54, 55). As a result, some inflammation and damage caused by ischemia occurs. However, whether ADP can play a protective role against vertebral ischemic injury needs to be verified by more in-depth studies.

From a molecular biology perspective, the relationship between TG and IVDD can be explored at several levels. First, certain genes associated with TG metabolism may show aberrant expression in patients with IVDD, and such changes may affect disc cell metabolism and function by affecting TG synthesis or catabolism. For example, lipoprotein lipase and lipoprotein lipase-related protein play key roles in TG metabolism (56, 57), and their reduced expression in patients with IVDD may lead to TG accumulation, which affects intracellular lipid homeostasis and, consequently, disc health. Second, signaling pathways related to TG metabolism may be altered in IVDD, affecting cell proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis. For example, the insulin signaling pathway plays an important role in regulating lipid metabolism and glucose metabolism, and its abnormalities may affect energy metabolism and anabolism of intervertebral disc cells, leading to degenerative changes (58). In addition, high TG levels may trigger cellular stress responses, such as endoplasmic reticulum stress, which affect disc cell function (59). Endoplasmic reticulum stress leads to the unfolded protein response, which activates the expression of a variety of stress-related genes and affects the balance of protein synthesis and degradation in cells, and prolonged endoplasmic reticulum stress may lead to cellular dysfunction and degeneration (60). TG accumulation may also trigger an inflammatory response, which may further exacerbate IVDD development. TG and its metabolites may affect the development of IVDD through the activation of inflammation-related signaling pathways, such as the NF-κB pathway, promoting the release of inflammatory factors, triggering an inflammatory response in the disc tissue, and further damaging the structure and function of the disc (61). Abnormal TG metabolism may also affect the synthesis and degradation of the disc’s extracellular matrix, leading to degenerative changes in the intervertebral disc. For example, matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) play an important role in degenerative disc disease (62), and abnormal TG metabolism may affect the activity of MMPs, leading to degradation of the disc matrix and affecting disc stability and elasticity (63). Oxidative stress is also a key factor in the relationship between TG and IVDD. High TG levels may trigger oxidative stress (64), leading to damage and degenerative changes in intervertebral disc cells. Oxidative stress disrupts the intracellular antioxidant balance, leading to lipid peroxidation, protein oxidation, and DNA damage, which can further affect disc cell function and disc integrity (65, 66). Finally, genes associated with metabolic syndrome may play a role in IVDD, and these genes may affect both TG metabolism and disc health. For example, PPARγ (peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ) plays a key role in lipid metabolism and inflammatory responses, and aberrant expression of PPARγ may affect both TG metabolism and inflammatory responses in the intervertebral discs, which may contribute to the development of IVDD (6769). By exploring the above molecular biological mechanisms, we can gain a deeper understanding of the relationship between TG and IVDD and provide a theoretical basis for future therapeutic strategies.

Study strengths and limitations

This analysis has two strengths. First, it is the first study to investigate the relationship between liposomes and metabolites and the risk of IVDD using large-scale GWAS data, which eliminates confounders and reverse causality. This is highly beneficial in obtaining a thorough understanding of the relationship between liposomes and metabolites and the IVDD risk. Secondly, the bias was reduced through employing a two-sample study design, which involved using separate datasets for exposures and outcomes data, ensuring no intersection between the two sets of data. Nevertheless, there are certain aspects of this research that could be enhanced. Initially, the bulk of the data for this study was sourced from publicly accessible online databases; however, due to variations in platforms and geographic areas, some data might exhibit heterogeneity and may not entirely substitute for traditional research methods. Secondly, the IVDD data utilized in this study lacked specific details about the study subject, preventing a subgroup analysis based on various regions or gender. Consequently, the study outcomes might be limited in their applicability to populations from certain regions or specific genders. Finally, this study focused on analyzing causality from a genetic perspective, and the precise underlying mechanisms need to be explored in the future through necessary laboratory tests.

Conclusion

Our comprehensive MR analysis identified 13 liposomes and 79 metabolites, which may have possible causal links to IVDD. Additionally, we discovered three intermediary associations between liposomes and IVDD. These metabolites and liposomes will be useful for IVDD mechanistic research as well as clinical diagnostics for prognosis and risk assessment.

Statements

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Author contributions

D-QC: Conceptualization, Writing – original draft. Z-QQ: Validation, Writing – original draft. W-BX: Data curation, Software, Writing – original draft. K-YX: Formal analysis, Writing – original draft. N-KS: Visualization, Writing – original draft. H-YS: Formal analysis, Writing – original draft. J-YF: Formal analysis, Writing – original draft. G-XL: Funding acquisition, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. GR: Funding acquisition, Supervision, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This study received financial support from the Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province (Grant Number: 2021J05282), Xiamen Municipal Bureau of Science and Technology (Grant Number: 3502Z20224033) and Xiamen Science and Technology Program (No. 3502Z20224ZD1003).

Acknowledgments

We express gratitude to the GWAS catalog and FinnGen database for providing relevant genetic data.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fendo.2024.1403523/full#supplementary-material

References

  • 1

    YiJZhouQHuangJNiuSJiGZhengT. Lipid metabolism disorder promotes the development of intervertebral disc degeneration. BioMed Pharmacother. (2023) 166:115401. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2023.115401

  • 2

    RajPP. Intervertebral disc: anatomy-physiology-pathophysiology-treatment. Pain Pract. (2008) 8:1844. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2007.00171.x

  • 3

    ZhangWSunTLiYYangMZhaoYLiuJet al. Application of stem cells in the repair of intervertebral disc degeneration. Stem Cell Res Ther. (2022) 13:70. doi: 10.1186/s13287-022-02745-y

  • 4

    Mohd IsaILMokhtarSAAbbahSAFauziMBDevittAPanditA. Intervertebral disc degeneration: biomaterials and tissue engineering strategies toward precision medicine. Adv Healthc Mater. (2022) 11:e2102530. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202102530

  • 5

    TeraguchiMYoshimuraNHashizumeHMurakiSYamadaHOkaHet al. Metabolic syndrome components are associated with intervertebral disc degeneration: the wakayama spine study. PloS One. (2016) 11:e0147565. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147565

  • 6

    HuangZChenJSuYGuoMChenYZhuYet al. Impact of dyslipidemia on the severity of symptomatic lumbar spine degeneration: A retrospective clinical study. Front Nutr. (2022) 9:1033375. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.1033375

  • 7

    ZhangYZhaoYWangMSiMLiJHouYet al. Serum lipid levels are positively correlated with lumbar disc herniation–a retrospective study of 790 Chinese patients. Lipids Health Dis. (2016) 15:80. doi: 10.1186/s12944-016-0248-x

  • 8

    CuricG. Intervertebral disc and adipokine leptin-loves me, loves me not. Int J Mol Sci. (2020) 22:375. doi: 10.3390/ijms22010375

  • 9

    WalshTPArnoldJBEvansAMYaxleyADamarellRAShanahanEM. The association between body fat and musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. (2018) 19:233. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2137-0

  • 10

    LiuCGaoXLouJLiHChenYChenMet al. Aberrant mechanical loading induces annulus fibrosus cells apoptosis in intervertebral disc degeneration via mechanosensitive ion channel Piezo1. Arthritis Res Ther. (2023) 25:117. doi: 10.1186/s13075-023-03093-9

  • 11

    UrbanJPRobertsS. Degeneration of the intervertebral disc. Arthritis Res Ther. (2003) 5:120–30. doi: 10.1186/ar629

  • 12

    LiukeMSolovievaSLamminenALuomaKLeino-ArjasPLuukkonenRet al. Disc degeneration of the lumbar spine in relation to overweight. Int J Obes (Lond). (2005) 29:903–8. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802974

  • 13

    FranciscoVPinoJGonzález-GayLagoFKarppinenJTervonenOet al. A new immunometabolic perspective of intervertebral disc degeneration. Nat Rev Rheumatol. (2022) 18:4760. doi: 10.1038/s41584-021-00713-zIF:33.7

  • 14

    Ruiz-FernándezCFranciscoVPinoJMeraAGonzález-GayMAGómezRet al. Molecular relationships among obesity, inflammation and intervertebral disc degeneration: are adipokines the common link? Int J Mol Sci. (2019) 20:2030. doi: 10.3390/ijms20082030

  • 15

    HuSShaoZZhangCChenLMamunAAZhaoNet al. Chemerin facilitates intervertebral disc degeneration via TLR4 and CMKLR1 and activation of NF-kB signaling pathway. Aging (Albany NY). (2020) 12:11732–53. doi: 10.18632/aging.103339

  • 16

    HeindelJJNewboldRSchugTT. Endocrine disruptors and obesity. Nat Rev Endocrinol. (2015) 11:653–61. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2015.163

  • 17

    SinglaPBardoloiAParkashAA. Metabolic effects of obesity: A review. World J Diabetes. (2010) 1:7688. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v1.i3.76

  • 18

    OuchiNParkerJLLugusJJWalshK. Adipokines in inflammation and metabolic disease. Nat Rev Immunol. (2011) 11:8597. doi: 10.1038/nri2921

  • 19

    OttensmannLTabassumRRuotsalainenSEGerlMJKloseCWidénEet al. Genome-wide association analysis of plasma lipidome identifies 495 genetic associations. Nat Commun. (2023) 14:6934. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-42532-8

  • 20

    NaPierZKanimLEAArabiYSalehiKSearsBPerryMet al. Omega-3 fatty acid supplementation reduces intervertebral disc degeneration. Med Sci Monit. (2019) 25:9531–7. doi: 10.12659/MSM.918649

  • 21

    ZhengJBairdDBorgesMCBowdenJHemaniGHaycockPet al. Recent developments in mendelian randomization studies. Curr Epidemiol Rep. (2017) 4:330–45. doi: 10.1007/s40471-017-0128-6

  • 22

    ZhuTGoodarziMO. Causes and consequences of polycystic ovary syndrome: insights from mendelian randomization. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. (2022) 107:e899–911. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgab757

  • 23

    BoefAGDekkersOMle CessieS. Mendelian randomization studies: a review of the approaches used and the quality of reporting. Int J Epidemiol. (2015) 44:496511. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyv071

  • 24

    LawlorDAHarbordRMSterneJATimpsonNDavey SmithG. Mendelian randomization: using genes as instruments for making causal inferences in epidemiology. Stat Med. (2008) 27:1133–63. doi: 10.1002/sim.3034

  • 25

    HartwigFPDaviesNMHemaniGDavey SmithG. Two-sample Mendelian randomization: avoiding the downsides of a powerful, widely applicable but potentially fallible technique. Int J Epidemiol. (2016) 45:1717–26. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyx028

  • 26

    MaXYLiuHMLvWQQiuCXiaoHMDengHW. A bi-directional Mendelian randomization study of the sarcopenia-related traits and osteoporosis. Aging (Albany NY). (2022) 14:5681–98. doi: 10.18632/aging.204145

  • 27

    ChenYLuTPettersson-KymmerUStewartIDButler-LaporteGNakanishiTet al. Genomic atlas of the plasma metabolome prioritizes metabolites implicated in human diseases. Nat Genet. (2023) 55:4453. doi: 10.1038/s41588-022-01270-1

  • 28

    BurgessSButterworthAThompsonSG. Mendelian randomization analysis with multiple genetic variants using summarized data. Genet Epidemiol. (2013) 37:658–65. doi: 10.1002/gepi.21758

  • 29

    BowdenJDavey SmithGHaycockPCBurgessS. Consistent estimation in mendelian randomization with some invalid instruments using a weighted median estimator. Genet Epidemiol. (2016) 40:304–14. doi: 10.1002/gepi.21965

  • 30

    BowdenJDavey SmithGBurgessS. Mendelian randomization with invalid instruments: effect estimation and bias detection through Egger regression. Int J Epidemiol. (2015) 44:512–25. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyv080

  • 31

    BurgessSThompsonSG. Interpreting findings from Mendelian randomization using the MR-Egger method. Eur J Epidemiol. (2017) 32:377–89. doi: 10.1007/s10654-017-0255-x

  • 32

    NiuPPSongBWangXXuYM. Serum uric acid level and multiple sclerosis: A mendelian randomization study. Front Genet. (2020) 11:254. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2020.00254

  • 33

    YavorskaOOBurgessS. MendelianRandomization: an R package for performing Mendelian randomization analyses using summarized data. Int J Epidemiol. (2017) 46:1734–9. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyx034

  • 34

    YanHZhaoSHuangHXXiePCaiXHQuYDet al. Systematic Mendelian randomization study of the effect of gut microbiome and plasma metabolome on severe COVID-19. Front Immunol. (2023) 14:1211612. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1211612

  • 35

    LewisRGSimpsonBGenetics, Autosomal Dominant. StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL: StatPearls Publishing (2023).

  • 36

    FanCChuGYuZJiZKongFYaoLet al. The role of ferroptosis in intervertebral disc degeneration. Front Cell Dev Biol. (2023) 11:1219840. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2023.1219840

  • 37

    LiuHHLiJJ. Aging and dyslipidemia: a review of potential mechanisms. Ageing Res Rev. (2015) 19:4352. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2014.12.001

  • 38

    ZhangXChenJHuangBWangJShanZLiuJet al. Obesity mediates apoptosis and extracellular matrix metabolic imbalances via MAPK pathway activation in intervertebral disk degeneration. Front Physiol. (2019) 10:1284. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.01284

  • 39

    KauppilaLI. Atherosclerosis and disc degeneration/low-back pain–a systematic review. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. (2009) 37(6):661–70. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2009.02.006

  • 40

    KauppilaLIPenttiläAKarhunenPJLaluKHannikainenP. Lumbar disc degeneration and atherosclerosis of the abdominal aorta. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). (1994) 19:923–9. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199404150-00010

  • 41

    ChaudhariNRoperSD. Molecular and physiological evidence for glutamate (umami) taste transduction via a G protein-coupled receptor. Ann N Y Acad Sci. (1998) 855:398406. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1998.tb10598.x

  • 42

    KuriharaKKashiwayanagiM. Physiological studies on umami taste. J Nutr. (2000) 30:931S–4S. doi: 10.1093/jn/130.4.931S

  • 43

    KinnamonSC. Umami taste transduction mechanisms. Am J Clin Nutr. (2009) 90:753S–5S. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2009.27462K

  • 44

    ZhangBXuYLiuJWuCZhaoXZhouLet al. Oral Intake of Inosine 5’-Monophosphate in Mice Promotes the Absorption of Exogenous Fatty Acids and Their Conversion into Triglycerides though Enhancing the Phosphorylation of Adenosine 5’-Monophosphate-Activated Protein Kinase in the Liver, Leading to Lipohyperplasia. Int J Mol Sci. (2023) 24:14588. doi: 10.3390/ijms241914588

  • 45

    ShiriRLallukkaTKarppinenJViikari-JunturaE. Obesity as a risk factor for sciatica: a meta-analysis. Am J Epidemiol. (2014) 179:929–37. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwu007

  • 46

    ZhangTTLiuZLiuYLZhaoJJLiuDWTianQB. Obesity as a risk factor for low back pain: A meta-analysis. Clin Spine Surg. (2018) 31:22–7. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000468

  • 47

    LoukovaaraSSahanneSJalkanenSYegutkinGG. Increased intravitreal adenosine 5’-triphosphate, adenosine 5’-diphosphate and adenosine 5’-monophosphate levels in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Acta Ophthalmol. (2015) 93:6773. doi: 10.1111/aos.12507

  • 48

    EltzschigHKSitkovskyMVRobsonSC. Purinergic signaling during inflammation. N Engl J Med. (2012) 367:2322–33. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1205750

  • 49

    GrenzAHomannDEltzschigHK. Extracellular adenosine: a safety signal that dampens hypoxia-induced inflammation during ischemia. Antioxid Redox Signal. (2011) 15:2221–34. doi: 10.1089/ars.2010.3665

  • 50

    HartMLGorzollaICSchittenhelmJRobsonSCEltzschigHK. SP1-dependent induction of CD39 facilitates hepatic ischemic preconditioning. J Immunol. (2010) 184:4017–24. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0901851

  • 51

    GrenzAZhangHHermesMEckleTKlingelKHuangDYet al. Contribution of E-NTPDase1 (CD39) to renal protection from ischemia-reperfusion injury. FASEB J. (2007) 21:2863–73. doi: 10.1096/fj.06-7947com

  • 52

    CronsteinBNDagumaLNicholsDHutchisonAJWilliamsM. The adenosine/neutrophil paradox resolved: human neutrophils possess both A1 and A2 receptors that promote chemotaxis and inhibit O2 generation, respectively. J Clin Invest. (1990) 85:1150–7. doi: 10.1172/JCI114547

  • 53

    GrenzAOsswaldHEckleTYangDZhangHTranZVet al. The reno-vascular A2B adenosine receptor protects the kidney from ischemia. PloS Med. (2008) 5:e137. doi: 10.1371/journal.0050137

  • 54

    KauppilaLIMcAlindonTEvansSWilsonPWKielDFelsonDT. Disc degeneration/back pain and calcification of the abdominal aorta. A 25-year follow-up study in Framingham. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). (1997) 22:1642–7. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199707150-00023

  • 55

    KauppilaLI. Prevalence of stenotic changes in arteries supplying the lumbar spine. A postmortem angiographic study 140 subjects Ann Rheum Dis. (1997) 56:591–5. doi: 10.1136/ard.56.10.591

  • 56

    MeadJRIrvineSARamjiDP. Lipoprotein lipase: structure, function, regulation, and role in disease. J Mol Med (Berl). (2002) 80:753–69. doi: 10.1007/s00109-002-0384-9

  • 57

    BeisiegelUWeberWIhrkeGHerzJStanleyKK. The LDL-receptor-related protein, LRP, is an apolipoprotein E-binding protein. Nature. (1989) 341:162–4. doi: 10.1038/341162a0

  • 58

    AkhtarASahSP. Insulin signaling pathway and related molecules: Role in neurodegeneration and Alzheimer’s disease. Neurochem Int. (2020) 135:104707. doi: 10.1016/j.neuint.2020.104707

  • 59

    MollicaMPLionettiLPuttiRCavaliereGGaitaMBarlettaA. From chronic overfeeding to hepatic injury: role of endoplasmic reticulum stress and inflammation. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. (2011) 21:222–30. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2010.10.012

  • 60

    ChenXShiCHeMXiongSXiaX. Endoplasmic reticulum stress: molecular mechanism and therapeutic targets. Signal Transduct Target Ther. (2023) 8:352. doi: 10.1038/s41392-023-01570-w

  • 61

    LuYQieDYangFWuJ. LncRNA MEG3 aggravates adipocyte inflammation and insulin resistance by targeting IGF2BP2 to activate TLR4/NF-κB signaling pathway. Int Immunopharmacol. (2023) 121:110467. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2023.110467

  • 62

    GlaeserJDSalehiKKanimLEANaPierZKropfMACuéllarJMet al. NF-κB inhibitor, NEMO-binding domain peptide attenuates intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine J. (2020) 20:1480–91. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.04.025

  • 63

    KozakovaMMorizzoCGoncalvesINataliANilssonJPalomboC. Cardiovascular organ damage in type 2 diabetes mellitus: the role of lipids and inflammation. Cardiovasc Diabetol. (2019) 18:61. doi: 10.1186/s12933-019-0865-6

  • 64

    LiTGuoWZhouZ. Adipose triglyceride lipase in hepatic physiology and pathophysiology. Biomolecules. (2021) 12:57. doi: 10.3390/biom12010057

  • 65

    WangYChengHWangTZhangKZhangYKangX. Oxidative stress in intervertebral disc degeneration: Molecular mechanisms, pathogenesis and treatment. Cell Prolif. (2023) 56:e13448. doi: 10.1111/cpr.13448

  • 66

    YangRZXuWNZhengHLZhengXFLiBJiangLSet al. Involvement of oxidative stress-induced annulus fibrosus cell and nucleus pulposus cell ferroptosis in intervertebral disc degeneration pathogenesis. J Cell Physiol. (2021) 236(4):2725–39. doi: 10.1002/jcp.30039

  • 67

    ChengPWeiHZChenHWWangZQMaoPZhangHH. DNMT3a-mediated methylation of PPARγ promote intervertebral disc degeneration by regulating the NF-κB pathway. J Cell Mol Med. (2024) 28:e18048. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.18048

  • 68

    LiuYQuYLiuLZhaoHMaHSiMet al. PPAR-γ agonist pioglitazone protects against IL-17 induced intervertebral disc inflammation and degeneration via suppression of NF-κB signaling pathway. Int Immunopharmacol. (2019) 72:138–47. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2019.04.012

  • 69

    SivasamiPElkinsCDiaz-SaldanaPPGossKPengAHamerskyM4et al. Obesity-induced dysregulation of skin-resident PPARγ+ Treg cells promotes IL-17A-mediated psoriatic inflammation. Immunity. (2023) 56:1844–61. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2023.06.021

Summary

Keywords

intervertebral disk degeneration, causality, liposome, metabolite, Mendelian randomization

Citation

Chen D-Q, Que Z-Q, Xu W-B, Xiao K-Y, Sun N-K, Song H-Y, Feng J-Y, Lin G-X and Rui G (2024) Nucleotide polymorphism-based study utilizes human plasma liposomes to discover potential therapeutic targets for intervertebral disc disease. Front. Endocrinol. 15:1403523. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1403523

Received

20 March 2024

Accepted

24 July 2024

Published

15 August 2024

Volume

15 - 2024

Edited by

Sidong Yang, The University of Queensland, Australia

Reviewed by

Joe Kodama, University of Maryland, United States

Hongfei Xiang, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, China

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Gang Rui, ; Guang-Xun Lin,

†These authors have contributed equally to this work

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics