Abstract
Background:
This study aimed to determine the correlation of plasma asprosin with anthropometric and metabolic parameters in Korean children and adolescents.
Methods:
This single-center study included 109 Korean children and adolescents: 62 (56.9%) obese participants with a body mass index (BMI) ≥95th percentile and 47 (43.1%) healthy controls with BMI between the 15th and 85th percentile. Metabolic parameters were measured, including fasting blood glucose, fasting insulin, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), triglyceride and glucose (TyG) index, and lipid profiles.
Results:
Plasma asprosin levels were higher in the obese group than in the control group (mean 87.0 vs. 69.3 ng/mL; p = 0.001) and in the IR group than in the non-IR group (mean 98.6 vs. 70.2 ng/mL; p < 0.001). Plasma asprosin levels were not associated with sex or pubertal stage. Plasma asprosin levels were positively correlated with BMI SDS (r = 0.34; p = 0.002), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) (r = 0.25; p = 0.02), glucose (r = 0.33; p = 0.002), insulin (r = 0.44; p < 0.001), HOMA-IR (r = 0.47; p < 0.001), triglyceride (TG) (r = 0.33; p = 0.003), high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (r = -0.29; p = 0.008), and TyG index (r = 0.38; p < 0.001). Multiple linear regression analysis indicated that plasma asprosin levels were independently associated with HOMA-IR (p < 0.001) and TG/HDL cholesterol ratio (p < 0.001).
Conclusions:
This study demonstrated an association between plasma asprosin levels and obesity and insulin resistance in Korean children and adolescents.
1 Introduction
Obesity is defined as an accumulation of excess body fat. Adipose tissue serves as an energy storage organ and secretes lipids, peptides, cytokines, and adipokines that regulate the metabolism of the liver, muscles, heart, and central nervous system. Childhood obesity has become one of the more significant public health issues worldwide (1), and it is strongly associated with type 2 diabetes, a high risk of cardiovascular diseases, and metabolic syndrome in adulthood (2).
Asprosin has been identified as a fasting-induced protein hormone that modulates hepatic glucose release, and it is cleaved from the C-terminal end of profibrillin (encoded by FBN1). Increased asprosin levels in the liver trigger cAMP and PKA signaling pathways, resulting in higher glucose release from the liver to circulation (3). Human adult studies have shown increased circulating asprosin levels in patients with obesity (4), insulin resistance (3, 5–7), metabolic syndrome (8), type 2 diabetes mellitus (9, 10), or gestational diabetes mellitus (11). Ugur and Aydın reported that serum and saliva asprosin levels positively correlated with body mass index (BMI) (12). Experimental animal studies showed that neutralizing plasma asprosin using a monoclonal antibody reduces appetite and body weight in obese mice and improves their glycemic profile (13, 14). Wang et al. demonstrated that asprosin levels decreased significantly six months after bariatric surgery in the morbidly obese patients (15). In young women with low physical activity and visceral obesity, an 8-week exercise program improved BMI and insulin resistance, decreasing asprosin levels (16).
Despite these findings, only limited studies have evaluated the relationship between asprosin and obesity in children (17–20). Evaluation of the linkage between asprosin and obese children and adolescents who are not suffering from long-lasting obesity-related complications could broaden knowledge about the mechanisms underlying asprosin pathophysiology. The current study aimed to evaluate the relationship of asprosin levels with anthropometric and metabolic parameters in Korean children and adolescents.
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Subjects
All children and adolescents who visited the pediatric endocrinology clinic of Incheon St. Mary’s Hospital from December 2022 to November 2023 were screened for inclusion and exclusion criteria. Inclusion criteria were children and adolescents with obesity (defined as BMI ≥ 95th percentile for age and sex). Normal-weight subjects (defined as 15th ≤ BMI < 85th percentile for age and sex) were included as controls. Exclusion criteria were children with endocrine disorders (central precocious puberty, diabetes mellitus, growth hormone deficiency, idiopathic short stature, thyroid disease, rickets, Cushing disease), genetic disorders (Turner syndrome, Prader-Willi syndrome, congenital adrenal hypoplasia), and other chronic diseases (liver disease other than metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease [MASLD], renal disease). Subjects whose parents refused to participate in the study or those from whom fasting blood samples were not obtained were excluded. Figure 1 shows the flowchart of inclusion and exclusion criteria for the study. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants and their parents. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Incheon St. Mary’s Hospital (IRB number: OC22OISI0140).
Figure 1
2.2 Anthropometry measurements
Height was recorded to the nearest 0.1 cm using a Harpenden Stadiometer, and weight was recorded to the nearest 0.1 kg using an electronic scale. SDS for weight, height, and BMI were calculated according to age and sex using the reference data published in the 2017 Korean National Growth Charts (21). The pubertal stage was assessed by the pediatric endocrinologist according to Marshall and Tanner standards (22).
2.3 Laboratory evaluations
Venous blood samples were obtained in the morning after a 10-hour overnight fast. Serum samples were analyzed for HbA1c, glucose, insulin, total cholesterol, TG, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, aspartate transaminase (AST), alanine transaminase (ALT), uric acid, 25(OH)-vitamin D, and asprosin. In children with elevated ALT, measurements were taken every 3 months. If ALT was consistently more than twice the upper normal limit, further evaluation was conducted to exclude other causes of liver disease. Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels were measured using automated high-performance liquid chromatography (HLC-723 G7, Tosoh, Tokyo, Japan). Serum insulin levels were measured with Elecsys insulin Assay (Cobas e411 immunoassay analyzer; Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). Serum glucose, total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, TG, AST, and ALT were tested using a Beckman Coulter AU5800 clinical chemistry analyzer and the manufacturer’s reagents (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA). Serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D was measured with a Siemens ADVIA Centaur® vitamin D TOTAL immunoassay (Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany).
Blood samples for the measurement of plasma asprosin were collected using EDTA tubes and centrifuged at 2,000 × g for 10 minutes at room temperature. The isolated plasma samples were stored at -80°C until asprosin levels were measured. Plasma samples were diluted 1:2 with sample diluent, and asprosin levels were measured according to the manufacturer’s protocol using commercial ELISA kits (Cat. No. ab275108, ELISA sandwich kit, Abcam, USA). The manufacturer reported that the intra-assay coefficient of variation is 7.9% and the minimum detectable concentration is 0.92 ng/mL.
2.4 Definitions
Dyslipidemia was defined as either or a combination of total cholesterol ≥200 mg/dL, LDL cholesterol ≥ 130 mg/dL, HDL cholesterol ≤40 mg/dL, and TG ≥150 mg/dL according to the Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (23) and the American Diabetes Association (24). Insulin resistance was estimated from fasting glucose and insulin serum levels using the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) as fasting insulin (µU/ml) × fasting glucose (mmol/L)/22.5. Insulin resistance was defined as a HOMA-IR >2.5 in pre-pubertal and >4.0 in pubertal subjects (25). The TyG index was calculated as ln (fasting triglycerides [mg/dL] × fasting plasma glucose [mg/dL]/2).
2.5 Statistical analysis
All analyses were performed using R statistical software (version 4.3.2, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). Categorical variables are presented as numbers (%), and continuous variables are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Chi-square tests or Fisher’s exact tests were employed for categorical variables between two groups, as appropriate. The Student’s t-test and Mann-Whitney U test were utilized for continuous variables with normal and non-normal distributions, respectively. The normality of distribution was assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test. The correlation between asprosin and continuous variables was examined using Pearson’s correlation and partial correlation analysis. Multiple linear regression was used to estimate the independent association between asprosin levels and clinical parameters. Age, sex, and variables that were statistically significant in simple linear regression were included in the multiple linear regression analysis. Mediation analysis was conducted to examine whether the association between BMI-SDS and HOMA-IR was mediated by asprosin. All p-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
3 Results
3.1 Clinical characteristics of obese and normal weight groups
Table 1 shows the clinical and biochemical characteristics in the obese and normal weight groups. Of 109 children and adolescents, 62 (56.9%) were obese and 47 (43.1%) were normal weight (Figure 1). The mean age was 9.6 years (median, 9.0; range, 6–14). Male sex was more common in the obese group than in the control group (59.7 vs. 31.9%; p = 0.007). Height SDS, glucose, insulin, HOMA-IR, total cholesterol, and ALT were higher in the obese group than in the control group. Insulin resistance was more common in the obese group than in the control group (58.1% vs. 2.1%; p < 0.001). Dyslipidemia was more common in the obese group than in the control group (59.7% vs. 36.2%; p = 0.03). There were no significant differences in systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, Tanner stage, HbA1c, TG, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, TG/HDL cholesterol ratio, TyG index, AST, uric acid, and 25(OH)-vitamin D levels.
Table 1
| Characteristic | Obese (n = 62) | Control (n = 47) | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years | |||
|  Mean | 9.3 ± 2.0 | 9.9 ± 1.8 | 0.10 |
|  Median (range) | 9.0 (8.0–11.0) | 9.0 (9.0–11.0) | 0.08 |
| Male sex | 37 (59.7) | 15 (31.9) | 0.007 |
| Height SDS | 1.2 ± 0.9 | 0.3 ± 1.0 | <0.001 |
| Weight SDS | 2.0 ± 0.3 | 0.8 ± 0.6 | <0.001 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 24.9 ± 2.3 | 20.2 ± 1.3 | <0.001 |
| BMI SDS | 2.2 (2.1–2.4) | 0.8 (0.7–0.9) | <0.001 |
| Systolic BP, mmHg | 100 (100–112) | 100 (100–105) | 0.33 |
| Diastolic BP, mmHg | 60 (60–65) | 65 (60–65) | 0.44 |
| Tanner stage | 0.53 | ||
|  1 | 21 (33.9) | 9 (19.1) | |
|  2 | 25 (40.3) | 24 (51.1) | |
|  3 | 9 (14.5) | 8 (17.0) | |
|  4 | 5 (8.1) | 4 (8.5) | |
|  5 | 2 (3.2) | 2 (4.3) | |
| Puberty | 41 (66.1) | 38 (80.9) | 0.14 |
| HbA1c, % | 5.5 (5.3–5.6) | 5.3 (5.2–5.4) | 0.10 |
| Glucose, mg/dL | 94.5 ± 8.2 | 89.5 ± 8.8 | 0.02 |
| Insulin, μU/mL | 17.5 (13.1–22.6) | 7.3 (5.8–8.6) | <0.001 |
| HOMA-IR | 4.0 (2.9–5.1) | 1.7 (1.3–1.9) | <0.001 |
| Insulin resistance | 36 (58.1) | 1 (2.1) | <0.001 |
| Total cholesterol, mg/dL | 163 ± 32 | 148 ± 10 | 0.001 |
| Triglycerides, mg/dL | 120 ± 38 | 110 ± 42 | 0.32 |
| LDL cholesterol, mg/dL | 107 ± 25 | 110 ± 27 | 0.68 |
| HDL cholesterol, mg/dL | 49 (41–53) | 49 (47–63) | 0.21 |
| TG/HDL cholesterol ratio | 2.4 (1.7–3.2) | 1.7 (1.5–2.8) | 0.09 |
| Dyslipidemia | 37 (59.7) | 17 (36.2) | 0.03 |
| TyG index | 9.3 ± 0.4 | 9.1 ± 0.4 | 0.11 |
| AST, U/L | 22 (19–27) | 20 (17–26) | 0.20 |
| ALT, U/L | 22 (17–27) | 15 (14–20) | 0.006 |
| Uric acid, mg/dL | 5.1 ± 1.3 | 4.6 ± 1.0 | 0.10 |
| 25(OH)-vitamin D, ng/mL | 13.8 (6.7–18.4) | 14.5 (7.0–18.6) | 0.98 |
| Asprosin, ng/mL | 87.0 ± 26.2 | 69.3 ± 16.2 | 0.001 |
Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data for obese and control subjects.
For categorical variables, data are presented as the number of patients (%). For continuous variables, data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation for parametric variables or as the median (interquartile range) for nonparametric variables.
AST, aspartate transaminase; ALT, alanine transaminase; BMI, body mass index; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; HOMA-IR, homeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; SDS, standard deviation score; TyG index, triglyceride and glucose index.
3.2 Correlation of plasma asprosin with patient characteristics
Plasma asprosin levels did not differ between boys and girls (median 87.6 vs. 72.6; p = 0.14). Obese subjects had higher plasma asprosin levels than healthy subjects (mean 87.6 ± 26.2 vs. 69.3 ± 16.3 ng/mL; p = 0.001). This finding was not evident in boys (mean 87.8 ± 26.4 vs. 77.5 ± 17.6 ng/mL; p = 0.30), but it was evident in girls (mean 85.9 ± 26.4 vs. 63.9 ± 13.3 ng/mL; p = 0.002) (Figure 2). Plasma asprosin levels were higher in the insulin resistance group than in the non-insulin resistance group (mean 98.6 ± 24.6 vs. 70.2 ± 17.7 ng/mL; p < 0.001). This finding was evident in both boys (mean 99.8 ± 24.5 vs. 72.6 ± 17.9 ng/mL; p < 0.001) and girls (mean 96.7 ± 25.7 vs. 67.8 ± 17.6 ng/mL; p < 0.001) (Figure 3). There was no difference in plasma asprosin levels between subjects with and without dyslipidemia (mean 86.4 ± 29.0 vs. 78.4 ± 19.6 ng/mL; p = 0.14).
Figure 2
Figure 3
3.3 Correlations of plasma asprosin and clinical and biochemical parameters
Table 2 shows the simple correlation analysis between plasma asprosin and clinical and biochemical parameters. Plasma asprosin levels were positively correlated with BMI SDS (r = 0.34; p = 0.002), HbA1c (r = 0.25; p = 0.02), fasting glucose (r = 0.33; p = 0.002), fasting insulin (r = 0.44; p < 0.001), HOMA-IR (r = 0.47; p < 0.001), and TyG index (r = 0.38; p < 0.001). Plasma asprosin levels were positively correlated with TG (r = 0.33; p = 0.003) and negatively correlated with HDL cholesterol (r = -0.29; p = 0.008). Plasma asprosin level was positively correlated with TG/HDL cholesterol ratio (r = 0.42; p < 0.001). The positive correlation between plasma asprosin and BMI SDS was evident in the insulin resistance group (r = 0.39; p = 0.02) but not in the non-insulin resistance group (r = 0.05; p = 0.76).
Table 2
| Characteristic | r | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| Age, years | -0.19 | 0.09 |
| BMI SDS | 0.34 | 0.002 |
| Systolic BP, mmHg | 0.13 | 0.26 |
| Diastolic BP, mmHg | 0.12 | 0.29 |
| Tanner stage | -0.17 | 0.13 |
| HbA1c, % | 0.25 | 0.02 |
| Glucose, mg/dl | 0.33 | 0.002 |
| Insulin, μU/mL | 0.44 | <0.001 |
| HOMA-IR | 0.47 | <0.001 |
| Total cholesterol, mg/dl | 0.07 | 0.52 |
| Triglycerides, mg/dl | 0.33 | 0.003 |
| LDL cholesterol, mg/dl | 0.02 | 0.89 |
| HDL cholesterol, mg/dl | -0.29 | 0.008 |
| TG/HDL cholesterol ratio | 0.42 | <0.001 |
| TyG index | 0.38 | <0.001 |
| AST, U/L | 0.03 | 0.79 |
| ALT, U/L | 0.07 | 0.52 |
| Uric acid, mg/dl | 0.22 | 0.05 |
| 25(OH)-vitamin D, ng/mL | -0.19 | 0.12 |
Simple correlations between asprosin levels and clinical and biochemical parameters.
AST, aspartate transaminase; ALT, alanine transaminase; BMI, body mass index; BP, blood pressure; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; HOMA-IR, homeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; SDS, standard deviation score; TyG index, triglyceride and glucose index.
After adjusting for age and BMI SDS, glucose (r = 0.27; p = 0.02), insulin (r = 0.34; p = 0.002), HOMA-IR (r = 0.37; p < 0.001), TG (r = 0.27; p = 0.02), HDL cholesterol (r = -0.26; p = 0.02), TG/HDL cholesterol ratio (r = 0.37; p < 0.001), and TyG index (r = 0.31; p = 0.005) were significantly correlated with asprosin (Table 3). When adjusting for age within the same sex, the correlation of asprosin with insulin, HOMA-IR, and the TG/HDL cholesterol ratio was evident in both boys and girls. The correlation of asprosin with glucose and TyG index was evident in boys but not in girls. In contrast, the correlation of asprosin with uric acid and 25(OH)-vitamin D was evident in girls but not in boys (Table 3).
Table 3
| Characteristic | All subjects (n =109) | Boys (n =52) | Girls (n =57) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| r | p-value | r | p-value | r | p-value | |
| Systolic BP | 0.09 | 0.45 | 0.13 | 0.42 | -0.01 | 0.95 |
| Diastolic BP | 0.19 | 0.10 | 0.20 | 0.19 | 0.08 | 0.66 |
| Tanner stage | -0.03 | 0.77 | 0.02 | 0.90 | -0.16 | 0.36 |
| HbA1c | 0.21 | 0.06 | 0.21 | 0.17 | 0.30 | 0.08 |
| Glucose | 0.27 | 0.02 | 0.37 | 0.01 | 0.15 | 0.40 |
| Insulin | 0.34 | 0.002 | 0.41 | 0.006 | 0.34 | 0.045 |
| HOMA-IR | 0.37 | <0.001 | 0.48 | 0.001 | 0.35 | 0.04 |
| Total cholesterol | -0.03 | 0.81 | -0.01 | 0.97 | -0.08 | 0.65 |
| Triglycerides | 0.27 | 0.02 | 0.33 | 0.03 | 0.22 | 0.21 |
| LDL cholesterol | 0.00 | 0.99 | 0.02 | 0.91 | -0.08 | 0.63 |
| HDL cholesterol | -0.26 | 0.02 | -0.26 | 0.09 | -0.22 | 0.20 |
| TG/HDL cholesterol ratio | 0.37 | <0.001 | 0.38 | 0.01 | 0.37 | 0.03 |
| TyG index | 0.31 | 0.005 | 0.38 | 0.01 | 0.24 | 0.17 |
| AST | -0.05 | 0.64 | -0.12 | 0.43 | 0.05 | 0.78 |
| ALT | -0.01 | 0.90 | -0.14 | 0.36 | 0.16 | 0.34 |
| Uric acid | 0.21 | 0.06 | 0.01 | 0.96 | 0.51 | 0.002 |
| 25(OH)-vitamin D | -0.23 | 0.06 | -0.12 | 0.48 | -0.46 | 0.009 |
Partial correlations between asprosin levels and clinical and biochemical parametersa.
Partial correlations after adjustment for age and BMI SDS.
AST, aspartate transaminase; ALT, alanine transaminase; BMI, body mass index; BP, blood pressure; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; HOMA-IR, homeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; SDS, standard deviation score; TyG index, triglyceride and glucose index.
Table 4 shows multiple linear regression analysis between plasma asprosin levels and clinical parameters. Multiple linear regression analysis indicated that plasma asprosin levels were independently associated with HOMA-IR and TG/HDL cholesterol ratio (Adjusted R2 = 0.37, p < 0.001). Mediating effects analysis was conducted to examine whether the association between BMI SDS and HOMA-IR was mediated by asprosin (Figure 4). The size of the total effect of BMI SDS on HOMA-IR was estimated as β = 0.40 (where β is the standardized coefficient). The direct effect of BMI SDS on HOMA-IR was estimated as β = 0.27, accounting for 68% of the total effect. The indirect effect of BMI SDS on HOMA-IR was estimated as β = 0.13, accounting for 32% of the total effect. The results of the mediation analysis indicated that asprosin appeared to play a mediating role in the relationship between obesity and insulin resistance.
Table 4
| Simple linear regression | Multiple linear regressiona | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unstandardized coefficients | Standardized coefficients | Unstandardized coefficients | Standardized coefficients | |||||
| Variables | B | SE | β | p-value | B | SE | β | p-value |
| Age | -2.41 | 1.39 | -0.19 | 0.09 | -1.43 | 1.26 | -0.11 | 0.26 |
| Male sex | 7.19 | 5.58 | 0.14 | 0.20 | 9.72 | 5.05 | 0.19 | 0.06 |
| BMI SDS | 13.52 | 4.12 | 0.34 | 0.002 | 0.64 | 4.26 | 0.02 | 0.88 |
| HOMA-IR | 3.21 | 0.68 | 0.47 | <0.001 | 2.87 | 0.68 | 0.42 | <0.001 |
| TG/HDL cholesterol ratio | 8.95 | 2.17 | 0.42 | <0.001 | 8.15 | 1.95 | 0.38 | <0.001 |
Simple and multiple linear regression analyses of variables associated with plasma asprosin levels.
Adjusted R2 = 0.37, p < 0.001.
BMI SDS, body mass index standard deviation score; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; HOMA-IR, homeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance; SE, standard error; TG, triglycerides.
Figure 4
4 Discussion
We evaluated the associations between asprosin levels and anthropometric and metabolic parameters in 109 Korean children and adolescents. To our knowledge, this study is one of few to assess the associations of asprosin with obesity and insulin resistance in children, and it is the first in Korean children. We demonstrated significantly higher plasma asprosin levels in the obese group than in the controls and in the insulin resistance group than in the non-insulin resistance group. Plasma asprosin levels were positively correlated with BMI SDS, glucose, insulin, HOMA-IR, and TG and negatively correlated with HDL cholesterol.
Our research has uncovered a significant positive correlation between asprosin levels and BMI in children and adolescents. These findings are consistent with two pediatric studies (17, 19) but not with two others (18, 20). This discrepancy may be partly explained by differences in the study population and the experimental methods for quantification of asprosin. For example, two studies of Chinese children showed contrasting results regarding the correlation between BMI and asprosin levels. One study showed a positive correlation (17), while the other showed a negative one (18). BMI and HOMA-IR in obese children were higher in the former study (17) than in the latter study (18). It should be noted that different ELISA kits were used in all five studies, including our study and the four previous studies (17–20). In the present study, plasma asprosin levels were higher in children and adolescents with IR than in those without IR. Consistent with our findings, previous adult studies showed that asprosin levels were higher in the insulin resistance group than in the non-insulin resistance group (3, 5–7). Considering the association of asprosin with obesity and insulin resistance, asprosin may be a novel target molecule in preventing the development of child obesity and metabolic diseases.
The relationships between circulating asprosin levels and lipid parameters have been well described in adult studies (9, 10, 26). Li et al. found that asprosin levels in female adults positively correlated with total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and TG and negatively correlated with HDL cholesterol (26). Two other studies in adults with type 2 DM reported a positive correlation between asprosin levels and TG (9, 10). However, these correlations have yet to be evident in children (17–20). Notably, in this study, plasma asprosin levels were independently associated with the TG/HDL cholesterol ratio, which reflects the effect of insulin resistance on lipid metabolism (27). The TG/HDL cholesterol ratio has been recognized as a marker of structural vascular changes and insulin resistance in obese children (27–29). Our data suggest that plasma asprosin levels may play a role in insulin resistance and lipid metabolism in obese children. Further studies should be aimed at evaluating these issues.
In the current study, no correlation was found between plasma asprosin levels and Tanner stages in boys and girls, consistent with the findings of Long et al. (18). Several previous studies have shown conflicting results regarding the association between sex and circulating asprosin levels. We demonstrated no difference in plasma asprosin levels between boys and girls, consistent with two previous studies (17, 19). Some studies have shown lower asprosin levels in males than in females (7, 18, 20). Long et al. documented asprosin as being lower in boys than in girls in the obese group but not in the control group (18). However, another study demonstrated lower serum asprosin levels in boys than in girls (20).
This study has some limitations. First, our findings are based on a single-center cohort, and all subjects were referred to a pediatric endocrinologist. Therefore, the results might not be fully representative of the general population. Second, body fat mass, muscle mass, diet, and exercise status were unknown, and the effect of these factors on asprosin level remains to be determined. Third, HOMA-IR was used to determine IR, but clamp methods are considered the gold standard for evaluating IR. Lastly, the ELISA kit used has, to the best of our knowledge, not been evaluated by independent researchers, including ourselves.
In conclusion, this study identified significant correlations between elevated levels of asprosin and obesity and insulin resistance in Korean children and adolescents. Plasma asprosin levels were associated with parameters of glucose and lipid metabolism. Our findings suggest a potential role for asprosin in obesity and metabolic disorders, indicating the need for further research to better understand its function.
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Ethics statement
The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Incheon St. Mary’s Hospital (IRB number: OC22OISI0140). The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent for participation in this study was provided by the participants’ legal guardians/next of kin.
Author contributions
SK: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. SK: Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. YC: Funding acquisition, Supervision, Visualization, Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Incheon St. Mary’s Hospital (IRB number: OC22OISI0140). S-HK wishes to acknowledge the financial support of the Catholic Medical Center Research Foundation made in the program year of 2022.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1
KarnikSKanekarA. Childhood obesity: a global public health crisis. Int J Prev Med. (2012) 3:1–7.
2
FranksPWHansonRLKnowlerWCSieversMLBennettPHLookerHC. Childhood obesity, other cardiovascular risk factors, and premature death. N Engl J Med. (2010) 362:485–93. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0904130
3
RomereCDuerrschmidCBournatJConstablePJainMXiaFet al. Asprosin, a fasting-induced glucogenic protein hormone. Cell. (2016) 165:566–79. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.02.063
4
ZhouJYuanWGuoYWangYDaiYShenYet al. Asprosin is positively associated with metabolic syndrome in hemodialysis patients: a cross-sectional study. Ren Fail. (2023) 45:2220425. doi:Â 10.1080/0886022x.2023.2220425
5
ZinchukVVAl-JeburJSOGlutkinaNV. Oxygen-binding properties of blood in insulin resistance with different asprosin content. BioMed Khim. (2023) 69:133–9. doi: 10.18097/pbmc20236902133
6
ZhuLWangL. Serum asprosin levels are increased and associated with insulin resistance in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome: A retrospective case-control study. Med (Baltimore). (2023) 102:e33526. doi:Â 10.1097/md.0000000000033526
7
MirrMBraszak-CymermanALudziejewskaAKręgielska-NarożnaMBogdańskiPBrylWet al. Serum asprosin correlates with indirect insulin resistance indices. Biomedicines. (2023) 11. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11061568
8
HongTLiJYWangYDQiXYLiaoZZBhadelPet al. High serum asprosin levels are associated with presence of metabolic syndrome. Int J Endocrinol. (2021) 2021:6622129. doi:Â 10.1155/2021/6622129
9
NaiemianSNaeemipourMZareiMLari NajafiMGohariABehroozikhahMRet al. Serum concentration of asprosin in new-onset type 2 diabetes. Diabetol Metab Syndr. (2020) 12:65. doi:Â 10.1186/s13098-020-00564-w
10
ZhangLChenCZhouNFuYChengX. Circulating asprosin concentrations are increased in type 2 diabetes mellitus and independently associated with fasting glucose and triglyceride. Clin Chim Acta. (2019) 489:183–8. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2017.10.034
11
BozİBAytürk SaltSSaltÖSayınNCDibirdikİ. Association between plasma asprosin levels and gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. (2023) 16:2515–21. doi: 10.2147/dmso.S424651
12
UgurKAydinS. Saliva and blood asprosin hormone concentration associated with obesity. Int J Endocrinol. (2019) 2019:2521096. doi:Â 10.1155/2019/2521096
13
DuerrschmidCHeYWangCLiCBournatJCRomereCet al. Asprosin is a centrally acting orexigenic hormone. Nat Med. (2017) 23:1444–53. doi: 10.1038/nm.4432
14
MishraIDuerrschmidCKuZHeYXieWSilvaESet al. Asprosin-neutralizing antibodies as a treatment for metabolic syndrome. Elife. (2021) 10. doi:Â 10.7554/eLife.63784
15
WangCYLinTALiuKHLiaoCHLiuYYWuVCet al. Serum asprosin levels and bariatric surgery outcomes in obese adults. Int J Obes (Lond). (2019) 43:1019–25. doi: 10.1038/s41366-018-0248-1
16
KantorowiczMSzymuraJSzygulaZKusmierczykJMaciejczykMWiecekM. Nordic walking at maximal fat oxidation intensity decreases circulating asprosin and visceral obesity in women with metabolic disorders. Front Physiol. (2021) 12:726783. doi:Â 10.3389/fphys.2021.726783
17
WangMYinCWangLLiuYLiHLiMet al. Serum asprosin concentrations are increased and associated with insulin resistance in children with obesity. Ann Nutr Metab. (2019) 75:205–12. doi: 10.1159/000503808
18
LongWXieXDuCZhaoYZhangCZhanDet al. Decreased circulating levels of asprosin in obese children. Horm Res Paediatr. (2019) 91:271–7. doi: 10.1159/000500523
19
Sünnetçi SilistreEHatipoğlHU. Increased serum circulating asprosin levels in children with obesity. Pediatr Int. (2020) 62:467–76. doi: 10.1111/ped.14176
20
CoricaDAversaTCurròMTropeanoAPepeGAlibrandiAet al. Asprosin serum levels and glucose homeostasis in children with obesity. Cytokine. (2021) 142:155477. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2021.155477
21
KimJHYunSHwangSSShimJOChaeHWLeeYJet al. The 2017 Korean National Growth Charts for children and adolescents: development, improvement, and prospects. Korean J Pediatr. (2018) 61:135–49. doi: 10.3345/kjp.2018.61.5.135
22
MarshallWATannerJM. Variations in pattern of pubertal changes in girls. Arch Dis Child. (1969) 44:291–303. doi: 10.1136/adc.44.235.291
23
Expert Panel on Detection E, Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in A. Executive summary of the third report of the national cholesterol education program (NCEP) expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (Adult treatment panel III). JAMA. (2001) 285:2486–97. doi: 10.1001/jama.285.19.2486
24
American Diabetes Association. Management of dyslipidemia in children and adolescents with diabetes. Diabetes Care. (2003) 26:2194–7. doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.7.2194
25
ValerioGLicenziatiMRIannuzziAFranzeseASianiPRiccardiGet al. Insulin resistance and impaired glucose tolerance in obese children and adolescents from Southern Italy. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. (2006) 16:279–84. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2005.12.007
26
LiXLiaoMShenRZhangLHuHWuJet al. Plasma asprosin levels are associated with glucose metabolism, lipid, and sex hormone profiles in females with metabolic-related diseases. Mediators Inflammation. (2018) 2018:7375294. doi:Â 10.1155/2018/7375294
27
GianniniCSantoroNCaprioSKimGLartaudDShawMet al. The triglyceride-to-HDL cholesterol ratio: association with insulin resistance in obese youths of different ethnic backgrounds. Diabetes Care. (2011) 34:1869–74. doi: 10.2337/dc10-2234
28
UrbinaEMKhouryPRMcCoyCEDolanLMDanielsSRKimballTR. Triglyceride to HDL-C ratio and increased arterial stiffness in children, adolescents, and young adults. Pediatrics. (2013) 131:e1082–90. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-1726
29
Di BonitoPValerioGGrugniGLicenziatiMRMaffeisCMancoMet al. Comparison of non-HDL-cholesterol versus triglycerides-to-HDL-cholesterol ratio in relation to cardiometabolic risk factors and preclinical organ damage in overweight/obese children: the CARITALY study. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. (2015) 25:489–94. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2015.01.012
Summary
Keywords
asprosin, obesity, insulin resistance, children, mediation analysis
Citation
Kim S-H, Kim SE and Chun YH (2024) The association of plasma asprosin with anthropometric and metabolic parameters in Korean children and adolescents. Front. Endocrinol. 15:1452277. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1452277
Received
20 June 2024
Accepted
16 September 2024
Published
03 October 2024
Volume
15 - 2024
Edited by
Artur Mazur, University of Rzeszow, Poland
Reviewed by
Hannes Manell, Uppsala University, Sweden
Rafał Podgórski, University of Rzeszow, Poland
Updates
Copyright
© 2024 Kim, Kim and Chun.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Yoon Hong Chun, yoonhong76@gmail.com
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.