Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Endocrinol.

Sec. Clinical Diabetes

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1439592

Secular trend of gestational diabetes mellitus and its interaction effect with advance d maternal age on adverse maternal-perinatal outcomes among primiparous singleton and twin pregnancies in Hubei, China (2011-2019)

Provisionally accepted
Nawsherwan  ----Nawsherwan ----1*Hui  LiHui Li2Yanmei  SunYanmei Sun3Ijaz  HaqIjaz Haq4Shafaq  NaeemShafaq Naeem5Xiaoqiu  NiXiaoqiu Ni6
  • 1Xiamen University Affiliated Cardiovascular Hospital, Xiamen, Fujian Province, China
  • 2Taixing People's Hospital, Taixing, China
  • 3Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China
  • 4Department of Nursing, Children's Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China
  • 5Department of Preventive Medicine, School of Health Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China
  • 6First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang Province, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a metabolic disorder of pregnancy associated with multiple adverse maternal-perinatal outcomes among singleton and twin pregnancies and its incidence is increasing across the globe. We aimed to find the secular trend of GDM and its interaction effect with advanced maternal age (AMA) on adverse maternal-perinatal outcomes among primiparous singleton and twin pregnancies in Hubei, China. Results: The secular trend of GDM [average annual percentage change (AAPC) 51.3% (95% confidence interval (95%CI): 3.9, 120.5)] significantly increased among singleton pregnant women. Based on age groups, the secular trend of GDM significantly increased in younger women with singleton [AAPC, 53.2% (95%CI: 2.0, 130.0)] and twin gestations [AAPC, 83.7% (95%CI: 36.0, 148.1)] between 2011 and 2019. Among younger women with singleton gestation, GDM showed a higher risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP), C-section, and macrosomia compared with non-GDM. Among younger women with twin gestations, GDM increased the risk of nuchal cord, polyhydramnios, and preterm births. GDM was associated with an increased risk of HDP, nuchal cord, macrosomia, and congenital defects among older women with singleton gestation. The interaction effect between GDM and AMA significantly increased the risk of HDP (adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 2.5; 95% CI: 1.8, 3.6), C-section (aOR, 2.5; 95% CI: 1.9, 3.4), and preterm birth (aOR, 1.5; 95% CI: 1.1, 1.9) among singleton pregnancies. Conclusion: Among younger women with singleton and twin gestations, the secular trend of GDM significantly increased between 2011 and 2019. Among singleton pregnancies, GDM is associated with an increased risk of several adverse maternal-perinatal outcomes in both younger and older women. The interaction effect between GDM and AMA significantly increased the risk of HDP, C-section, and preterm birth among singleton pregnancies.

Keywords: singleton, Twins, gestational diabetes mellitus, Advanced maternal age, adverse

Received: 28 May 2024; Accepted: 18 Jul 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 ----, Li, Sun, Haq, Naeem and Ni. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Nawsherwan ----, Xiamen University Affiliated Cardiovascular Hospital, Xiamen, Fujian Province, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.