Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Endocrinol.

Sec. Cardiovascular Endocrinology

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1579836

This article is part of the Research TopicPreventing Cardiovascular Complications of Type 2 Diabetes - Volume IIView all 6 articles

Association of estimated glucose disposal rate with atrial fibrillation, heart failure and cardiovascular mortality in patients with diabetes:a prospective cohort study from the UK Biobank

Provisionally accepted
Zhen  TanZhen Tan1Yijun  LiuYijun Liu1Lei  LiuLei Liu1Shuang  LiShuang Li1Xinrui  XueXinrui Xue1Xiaoping  LiXiaoping Li2Hongqiang  RenHongqiang Ren1*
  • 1Suining Central Hospital, Suining, China
  • 2Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences and Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background Estimated glucose disposal rate (eGDR) was a novel non-insulin-based marker of insulin resistance (IR), which had been used in many studies to evaluate the clinical prognosis of diabetes. However, the association of eGDR with atrial fibrillation (AF), heart failure (HF) and cardiovascular mortality in patients with diabetes remains unclear. Methods The study utilized UK Biobank data from 31,733 participants. Kaplan-Meier curves and Log-rank tests assessed AF, HF, and cardiovascular mortality incidence. Multivariate Cox models and restricted cubic splines analyzed the associations of eGDR with these outcomes. Polygenic Risk Score (PRS) analysis evaluated the joint effects of eGDR and PRS. Boruta algorithm filtered key predictive variables. Subgroup analysis was performed using cardiovascular high-risk factors, and mediation analysis explored the relationships of eGDR with the outcomes. Results Subjects with higher eGDR were more likely to be female, younger, more physically active, non-smoker, and non-drinker. The cumulative incidence of AF, HF, and cardiovascular mortality in the higher quartiles of GDR were significantly lower than those in the lowest quartile (log-rank P < 0.001 for all). eGDR exhibited an independent negative linear correlation with the risk of AF (HR = 0.94, 95% CI: 0.91-0.96), HF (HR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.74-0.82), and cardiovascular mortality (HR = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.83-0.88) risk. eGDR made the most significant contribution to the predicted outcomes. In diabetic patients with high genetic susceptibility, high eGDR could reduce the risk of AF (HR = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.51-0.90), HF (HR = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.29-0.62), and cardiovascular mortality (HR = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.22-0.42). Mediation analysis demonstrated that 10.7%, 7.9%, and 10.3% of the relationship between eGDR and AF, HF, and cardiovascular mortality among individuals with diabetes were mediated by eGFR, respectively. Conclusions This study demonstrated that higher eGDR levels were associated with a decreased risk of AF, HF, and cardiovascular mortality. Therefore, eGDR may serve as a valuable tool for predicting the risk of AF, HF, and cardiovascular mortality in patients with diabetes.

Keywords: Estimated glucose disposal rate, cardiovascular disease, Atrial Fibrillation, Heart Failure, Cardiovascular mortality, Patients with diabetes, UK Biobank

Received: 19 Feb 2025; Accepted: 26 Jun 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Tan, Liu, Liu, Li, Xue, Li and Ren. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Hongqiang Ren, Suining Central Hospital, Suining, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.