Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Endocrinol.

Sec. Diabetes: Molecular Mechanisms

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1589575

This article is part of the Research TopicResearch in Obesity, Type 2 Diabetes, and Metabolic Syndrome: Cellular Pathways and Therapeutic InnovationsView all 13 articles

The rs7799039 Variant in the Leptin Gene Promoter Drives Insulin Resistance Through Reduced Serum Leptin Levels

Provisionally accepted
Yongyan  SongYongyan Song1*Youjin  ZhangYoujin Zhang1Xinyu  LiuXinyu Liu2Wang  GongWang Gong2Yinquan  AiYinquan Ai2Binger  ShenBinger Shen2Jing  LiJing Li2Ya  LiuYa Liu2*
  • 1Central Laboratory, Clinical Medical College & Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
  • 2Clinical Medical College of Chengdu University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background The associations between the rs7799039 variant in the promoter region of the leptin gene (LEP) and the rs1137100, rs1137101, and rs1805094 variants in the exons of the leptin receptor gene (LEPR) with leptin levels and glucose-lipid metabolism markers have been examined across various populations. However, the findings have been inconsistent and, at times, contradictory. Methods Eligible studies were identified through a search of PubMed, Google Scholar, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP databases. A random-effects model was employed, and the standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) was calculated to assess the differences in leptin levels and glucose-lipid metabolism markers between subjects with different genotypes of the rs7799039, rs1137100, rs1137101, or rs1805094 variants. Heterogeneity among studies was evaluated using Cochran’s Q-test, based on the χ² statistic. Publication bias was assessed using Begg’s test. Results A total of 33 studies (10,471 subjects) for the rs7799039 variant, 12 studies (6,595 subjects) for the rs1137100 variant, 48 studies (18,890 subjects) for the rs1137101 variant, and 20 studies (5,051 subjects) for the rs1805094 variant were included in the pooled analyses. A significant association was found for A-allele carriers of LEP rs7799039 variant, who exhibited lower levels of leptin (SMD = -0.18 ng/mL, 95% CI = -0.31 to -0.04 ng/mL, p = 0.01), and higher levels of insulin (SMD = 0.22 μmol/μL, 95% CI = 0.07 to 0.37 μmol/μL, p < 0.01), and HOMA-IR (SMD = 0.26, 95% CI = 0.08 to 0.43, p < 0.01) compared to GG homozygotes. For LEPR rs1137100, rs1137101, and rs1805094 variants, no significant associations with leptin or glucose-lipid metabolism markers were observed in the pooled meta-analyses of the total population. However, significant associations were detected between the rs1137101 and rs1805094 variants and leptin or glucose-lipid metabolism markers in subgroup analyses stratified by sex, ethnicity, and health status. Conclusions The meta-analysis suggests that the A allele of LEP rs7799039 variant is associated with an increased risk of insulin resistance, potentially through its effect on reducing leptin levels. LEPR rs1137101 and rs1805094 variants show weak associations with leptin levels and glucose-lipid metabolism markers.

Keywords: Leptin, Rs7799039, Rs1137101, rs1805094, Glucose-lipid metabolism, variant

Received: 07 Mar 2025; Accepted: 19 Sep 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Song, Zhang, Liu, Gong, Ai, Shen, Li and Liu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Yongyan Song, songyongyan@cdu.edu.cn
Ya Liu, liuya@cdu.edu.cn

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.