ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Endocrinol.
Sec. Thyroid Endocrinology
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1608222
Value of a BRAF V600E and Lymphocyte Subset-Based Nomogram for Discriminating Benign Lesions from Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma in C-TIRADS 3 and Higher Nodules
Provisionally accepted- Chaohu Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Chaohu, Anhui, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
BACKGROUND: The BRAF V600E mutation and lymphocyte subsets may be associated with papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). This study established and validated a nomogram model to quantitatively predict the malignant risk of papillary thyroid carcinoma in thyroid nodules classified as C-TIRADS category 3 or higher, providing a reference for precise diagnosis and treatment of these moderately or highly suspicious nodules.METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed 210 patients with thyroid nodules (C-TIRADS ≥3), stratified by fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) results into benign and PTC groups. Clinical and laboratory parameters were systematically collected for all patients. Variable selection was performed using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression, with multicollinearity assessed using variance inflation factors (VIF < 5). Subsequently, significant predictors were incorporated into a multivariate nomogram. Binary logistic regression analysis was employed to identify independent risk factors for PTC following adjustment for potential confounding variables. Internal validation was performed using bootstrap resampling (1,000 iterations) to assess the model's predictive accuracy, clinical utility, and discriminative ability.Comparative analysis was conducted against the conventional C-TIRADS classification system to evaluate relative performance. RESULTS: Significant differences were observed between benign thyroid nodules and PTC in age, BRAF V600E genotype, natural killer (NK) cell counts, NK cell percentages, CD4+ T cell percentages, and ultrasound characteristics including size, echogenicity, composition, boundary, and morphology (P < 0.05). Five variables, including age, BRAF V600E genotype, NK cell counts, NK cell%, and CD4+ T cell%, were selected through LASSO regression with collinearity diagnostics for nomogram construction. The model demonstrated excellent discrimination (AUC=0.861, C-index=0.861), good calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow χ²=6.72, P=0.57), and superior accuracy compared to random prediction (Brier score=0.1061, P<0.05). Decision curve analysis confirmed its clinical utility across relevant probability thresholds. Finally, the comparative analysis demonstrated superior diagnostic performance of the novel nomogram relative to the C-TIRADS system (AUC: 0.862 vs. 0.752; P<0.01).CONCLUSION: The BRAF V600E -lymphocyte subset nomogram demonstrates robust clinical utility for discriminating benign lesions from PTC in C-TIRADS 3+ thyroid nodules, offering superior diagnostic performance to conventional risk stratification systems.
Keywords: PTC, BRAF V600E, NK cell, CD4+ T cell, Lymphocyte subpopulation, C-TIRADS, nomogram
Received: 08 Apr 2025; Accepted: 30 Jul 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Zhang, Zeng, Dou and Yu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Jiaqing Dou, Chaohu Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Chaohu, Anhui, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.