Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Endocrinol.

Sec. Clinical Diabetes

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1617248

This article is part of the Research TopicDiabetes Complications: Navigating Challenges and Unveiling New SolutionsView all 3 articles

Risk Factors for Mild Cognitive Impairment in Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Provisionally accepted
Yi  ZhaoYi Zhao1Hanlin  WangHanlin Wang2Guanghao  TangGuanghao Tang1Leilei  WangLeilei Wang1Ran  LiRan Li1*
  • 1Shandong Sport University, Jinan, China
  • 2School of Life Sciences, Ludong University, Yantai, Shandong Province, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), a transition between normal aging and dementia, is linked to higher dementia risk and potential reversibility. Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM), affecting over 537 million adults worldwide, increases susceptibility to MCI, with higher cognitive decline prevalence in diabetic populations. Previous meta-analyses focused on isolated factors, neglecting multidimensional interactions. This study synthesizes T2DM-MCI risk factors across clinical, lifestyle, and biochemical dimensions to support early identification and intervention of cognitive dysfunction in T2DM populations.This systematic review and meta-analysis, following PRISMA guidelines, searched five databases for articles published from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2024. Studies were screened based on predefined criteria, with data extracted independently by two researchers. Quality was assessed using Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) and Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) tools. Data were analyzed using RevMan software, with odds ratio (OR) and 95% CI as effect size measures. Heterogeneity was assessed using I² statistics, and subgroup analyses were conducted for factors with ≥10 studies.Results 30 studies with 10,469 participants were included. Prevalence rate of MCI in T2DM was 44.1%. Significant associations were found between T2DM-MCI and age (OR = 1.06, P = 0.01), female sex (OR = 1.23, P = 0.05), diabetes duration (OR = 1.07, P = 0.03), education (OR = 0.82, P = 0.0001), smoking (OR = 1.44, P = 0.003), hypertension (OR = 2.25, P < 0.001), cardiovascular disease (CVD) (OR = 2.61, P < 0.001), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) (OR = 1.33, P = 0.001), and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) (OR = 1.95, P = 0.02).This meta-analysis identifies advanced age (≥60 years), female sex, prolonged Diabetes duration (8-9 years), elevated HbA1c (>9%), and low education (≤6 years) as key predictors of MCI in T2DM, with significant dose-response relationships. Vascular comorbidities, insulin resistance, and inflammatory markers further exacerbate risks. Clinical priorities include rigorous glycemic control (HbA1c <7%), targeted cognitive screening for high-risk subgroups, and multidisciplinary care for patients with microvascular complications. However most of the studies included in this study come from Chinese people, so the generalization of the results may be limited.

Keywords: Mild Cognitive Impairment, type 2 diabetes, Risk factors, Diabetes duration, HbA1c, Meta-analysis

Received: 24 Apr 2025; Accepted: 26 May 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Zhao, Wang, Tang, Wang and Li. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Ran Li, Shandong Sport University, Jinan, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.