Jing Su
Shiqiong Lei1
Meiyuan Jin
Hongzhi Hu
Wenshan He- 1Department of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
- 2Department of Orthopedics, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
Parathyroid carcinoma (PC), an extremely rare endocrine malignancy, disrupts calciumphosphorus homeostasis and lead to musculoskeletal system disorders including osteoporosis, bone pain and pathological fractures. For postmenopausal women, osteoporosis is a common disease. Therefore, secondary osteoporosis is often overlooked in this demographic. We report a 54-year-old woman presenting to Orthopedics Department due to arthralgia diagnosed with severe postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO). After pharmacotherapy, the patient’s symptoms did not show significant improvement. Subsequent endocrine evaluation revealed hyperparathyroidism as the underlying cause. Following parathyroidectomy, histopathological evaluation confirmed the diagnosis of PC and her osteoporosis symptoms improved. This case highlights the critical need for postmenopausal women with osteoporosis to determine whether their condition is primary or secondary in nature. Moreover, the therapeutic principles for managing primary and secondary osteoporosis differ substantially. Early etiological identification is essential to optimize management.
1 Introduction
Parathyroid carcinoma, an extremely rare endocrine malignancy, comprises less than 1% of primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) cases and less than 0.005% of all cancers (1–3). The median onset age is 44–65 years with no gender prevalence (4, 5). It more manifests as a sporadic disease, occasionally being a part of specific syndromic and non-syndromic endocrine diseases (6). The overexpression of CCND1 and EZH2, mutations in CDC73/HRPT2, and promoter methylation of APC, SFRP1, SFRP2, SFRP4, CDKN2A and WT1 are implicated in parathyroid tumorigenesis (7). Whereas, the etiology and pathogenesis are still incompletely clear. Pre-operative diagnosis remains challenging due to nonspecific biomarkers. Almost all PCs are functional tumors, causing hypercalcemia-related renal, bone, digestive and psychiatric manifestations (5, 8). Among these, bone manifestations, including osteoporosis, bone pain and pathological fractures, are predominant.
Osteoporosis, a metabolic skeletal disorder characterized by low bone mass and degeneration of bone tissue structure, affects 200 million people worldwide (9). It can be categorized into primary osteoporosis (including PMO and senile osteoporosis) and secondary osteoporosis. The diagnostic criteria for PMO is the occurrence of fractures or dual-energy X-ray (DXA) T-score ≤ -2.5 standard deviations (SDs) at the femoral neck, total hip or lumbar spine (10). However, there is currently no consensus regarding specific evaluations to exclude secondary osteoporosis. Especially for postmenopausal women affected by estrogen, secondary osteoporosis is often overlooked.
This study is aimed to report a case of parathyroid carcinoma due to osteoporosis missed in postmenopausal women with arthralgia, which can be a warning to orthopedic surgeons.
2 Case report
Figure 1 maps the clinical timeline beginning with the orthopedic consultation of a 54-year-old postmenopausal patient with a history of hypertension, coronary artery disease, and chronic hepatitis B, without prior fragility fractures or known hereditary disorders. She presented to the Orthopedics Department in July 2024 with lumbar spine, knee and feet pain. A comprehensive physical examination was unremarkable. X-ray and DXA (T-score -4.0) confirmed severe osteoporosis. Combining the age, sex and the examination results, the patient was diagnosed with severe PMO, receiving denosumab injection and supplementation of calcitriol, calcium, phosphorus and vitamin D. At this time, neck ultrasound showed no parathyroid abnormalities and laboratory evaluation for secondary osteoporosis was not performed.
Figure 1. A timeline illustrating the progression from initial mismanagement of osteoporosis to definitive surgical cure of parathyroid carcinoma.
Two months later, due to persistent symptoms, the patient was referred to the endocrinology department. In view of the patient’s prior abnormal laboratory results, including hypercalcemia (3.28 mmol/L; normal, 2.03–2.54 mmol/L), hypophosphatemia (0.72 mmol/L; normal, 0.96–1.62 mmol/L), and elevated alkaline phosphatase (ALP, 389 U/L; normal, 40–150 U/L), 99mTc-sestamibi (MIBI) scintigraphy with computed tomography (CT) fusion imaging was performed to investigate potential parathyroid issues. Early-phase imaging (5 minutes post-injection) showed normal thyroid radiotracer uptake, whereas significantly increased radioactivity in the left inferior-middle thyroid lobe. Delayed imaging (1- and 2-hours post-injection) demonstrated persistent but lower activity in the left inferior-middle thyroid lobe (Figure 2). CT fusion localized a lesion (1.7 × 1.8 × 2.4 cm) posterior to the inferior-middle left thyroid lobe, but its origin remained indeterminate (Figure 2).
Figure 2. (A) 5 minutes, 1 hour and 2 hours after 99mTc-MIBI injection. (B) The 99mTc-MIBI scintigraphy with CT fusion imaging findings.
The patient was subsequently hospitalized. A thyroid ultrasonography revealed bilateral thyroid enlargement with multiple nodules and a solid hypoechoic nodule (27.9 × 17.1 × 13.6 mm) located dorsally in the inferomedial left thyroid lobe.
Preoperative laboratory findings showed normal thyroid function, increased serum calcium levels of 2.70 mmol/L (normal, 2.03-2.54 mmol/L), increased plasma parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels over 3000 pg/ml (normal, 15.0-68.3 pg/ml) and a low serum phosphorus level of 0.51 mmol/L (normal, 0.96-1.62 mmol/L).
3 Diagnostic assessment, treatment, and outcomes
The biochemical triad of hypercalcemia with hypophosphatemia and markedly elevated PTH supported PHPT. 99mTc-MIBI/CT fusion imaging and neck ultrasonography to the posterior inferomedial left thyroid lobe increased the post-test probability. Key diagnostic challenges included anchoring on primary postmenopausal osteoporosis and the limited performance of parathyroid ultrasonography in the setting of multinodular thyroid disease. The differential encompassed primary osteoporosis and non–PTH-mediated causes of hypercalcemia. Within primary hyperparathyroidism, adenoma, hyperplasia, and carcinoma were considered. Histopathology served as the reference standard.
Guided by preoperative localization, the left superior parathyroid gland was preserved in situ and the left inferior parathyroid gland was excised together with ipsilateral hemithyroidectomy and isthmusectomy. An intraoperative frozen section confirmed parathyroid neoplasm, and the definitive diagnosis of parathyroid carcinoma with coexistent nodular goiter was established on permanent histopathology.
On the second postoperative day, laboratory tests showed serum calcium 2.23 mmol/L (normal, 2.10–2.55 mmol/L), serum phosphate 0.93 mmol/L (normal, 0.81–1.45 mmol/L), and plasma PTH 38.7 pg/mL (normal, 15.0–68.3 pg/mL), indicating an adequate initial biochemical response. Adjuvant radiotherapy was administered after surgery. On serial follow-up, neck ultrasonography showed no new or suspicious abnormalities. Intermittent biochemical fluctuations of plasma PTH and of serum calcium and phosphate were observed. However, deviations from the reference ranges were small and not sustained, and the patient had no hypercalcemic symptoms or related complications. At the last follow-up, the patient remained clinically well with stable biochemistry. Longitudinal surveillance of serum calcium and parathyroid hormone is planned to monitor for recurrence.
4 Discussion
Osteoporosis is associated with aging and menopause, affecting women more than men in those over fifty (11). The postmenopausal decline in estrogen levels contributes to decreased bone mineral density and increased musculoskeletal pain (12). As PMO is the primary contributor to osteoporosis, orthopedic doctors frequently attribute musculoskeletal pain in postmenopausal women to PMO without considering other diagnoses. Current clinical practice guidelines recommend assessment for secondary causes of osteoporosis. However, there is no universally accepted laboratory testing standard, and the extent of testing is guided by the patient’s history and clinical findings. But serum calcium, serum phosphorus, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), creatinine and albumin are fundamental examinations (10). If the results of the aforementioned laboratory data are abnormal, further examinations are required. In our case, the normal parathyroid ultrasound result may divert clinical attention from potential parathyroid-related issues.
The parathyroid glands exhibit variable anatomical positions, often adjacent to the thyroid, which limits ultrasonographic differentiation of parathyroid pathologies in patients with concurrent thyroid nodules. Preoperative ultrasound demonstrates a sensitivity of 71%-93% in detecting parathyroid abnormalities (13, 14). In our case, since May 2022, serial neck ultrasounds annually have documented progressive enlargement and multiplication of thyroid nodules without detectable parathyroid abnormalities before October 2024. For doctors who are not thyroid surgeons or endocrinologists, normal ultrasound findings should not preclude parathyroid dysfunction. PTH evaluation remains essential in conjunction with abnormal electrolyte level. Taken together, in this patient the coherent sequence of lesion localization on multimodal imaging, followed by rapid postoperative biochemical normalization with symptomatic improvement, supports the internal validity of our inference that hyperparathyroidism was an important contributor, among multiple etiologies, to the skeletal manifestations.
The pre-operative diagnosis of PC remains challenging due to nonspecific biochemical and clinical manifestations. Comparing with benign parathyroid adenomas (BPA), the level of calcium, PTH and ALP in PC are markedly higher. A cohort study from South Korea showed that an ALP level of 285 IU/L had predictive value for PC (sensitivity 83%, specificity 97%) (15). In our case, initial ALP elevation (338U/L; normal, 40-150U/L) was documented on May 1, 2023, followed by hypercalcemia and hypophosphatemia detection on February 6, 2024. The absence of PTH measurement at the initial stage precludes definitive assessment and likely contributed to the delayed diagnosis. Previous studies have reported an association between hyperparathyroidism and thyroid disease, and lower PTH levels have been considered a potential risk factor for thyroid cancer (16, 17). However, the association between PTH and lesion size differs. Lower PTH has been linked to larger tumor foci and multifocality in thyroid cancer, while higher PTH has been associated with larger nodule size in thyroid nodules (16–18). Overall, evidence is limited and mainly comes from retrospective or prospective observational studies, and the mechanisms remain unclear. These observations raise two critical questions: 1) whether PC was already present in 2023, and 2) whether thyroid nodules progression reflects PTH-mediated effects. It is noteworthy that, PHPT patients with prior thyroid disease tend to be more asymptomatic compared to those without (19). This may explain the patient’s delayed orthopedic visit.
In our case, osteoporosis cannot be attributed to a single etiology. In a midlife woman, postmenopausal bone loss plausibly coexisted with PTH-mediated skeletal effects. Although parathyroidectomy normalized calcium, phosphate, and PTH, the patient remained osteoporotic and required ongoing anti-osteoporosis therapy. Interval DXA was not yet available due to short postoperative follow up. These findings support a combined contribution of postmenopausal osteoporosis and secondary osteoporosis due to hyperparathyroidism. At the level of an individual patient, there is no reliable method to quantify the relative weight of these mechanisms. Clinically, secondary causes should be systematically evaluated. When identified, these causes should be prioritized for treatment because management strategies differ substantially between primary and secondary osteoporosis.
Until now, surgery is still the gold standard of the treatment for PC. As for patients with unresectable PC, medication is mainly aimed to manage PTH-induced hypercalcemia. To be mentioned, pharmacological management differs fundamentally between PTH-mediated hypercalcemia and primary osteoporosis, despite partial overlap in drug classes (Table 1). In hypercalcemia driven by hyperparathyroidism, medications are primarily used for rapid calcium lowering and short-term suppression of osteoclastic bone resorption, often at higher doses and shorter dosing intervals than those used for fracture prevention in primary osteoporosis. By contrast, primary osteoporosis treatment aims at long-term fracture-risk reduction with lower-dose, intermittent regimens of antiresorptives, while anabolic agents (PTH analogues) are contraindicated in the setting of hypercalcemia or osteoporosis secondary to hyperparathyroidism. These differences underscore the clinical importance of excluding secondary causes before labeling postmenopausal women as having primary osteoporosis and initiating routine anti-osteoporotic therapy (20–24).
Table 1. Summary of medications in PTH-induced hypercalcemia and primary osteoporosis (20, 21, 23–27).
5 Patient perspective
Following diagnosis, the patient’s main concerns were the rarity of parathyroid carcinoma, the lack of standardized therapeutic guidelines, and uncertainty regarding prognosis.
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.
Ethics statement
Written informed consent was obtained from the participant/patient(s) for the publication of this case report.
Author contributions
JS: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft. SL: Writing – original draft. MJ: Writing – original draft. HH: Writing – review & editing. WH: Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82403917).
Conflict of interest
The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1. Marcocci C, Cetani F, Rubin MR, Silverberg SJ, Pinchera A, and Bilezikian JP. Parathyroid carcinoma. J Bone Miner Res. (2008) 23:1869–80. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.081018
2. Lee PK, Jarosek SL, Virnig BA, Evasovich M, and Tuttle TM. Trends in the incidence and treatment of parathyroid cancer in the United States. Cancer. (2007) 109:1736–41. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22599
3. Viswanath A, Drakou EE, Lajeunesse-Trempe F, Grossman AB, and Dimitriadis GK. Parathyroid carcinoma: New insights. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. (2024) 101966. doi: 10.1016/j.beem.2024.101966
4. Roser P, Leca BM, Coelho C, Schulte K-M, Gilbert J, Drakou EE, et al. Diagnosis and management of parathyroid carcinoma: a state-of-the-art review. Endocr-Relat Cancer. (2023) 30:e220287. doi: 10.1530/ERC-22-0287
5. Salcuni AS, Cetani F, Guarnieri V, Nicastro V, Romagnoli E, De Martino D, et al. Parathyroid carcinoma. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. (2018) 32:877–89. doi: 10.1016/j.beem.2018.11.002
6. Marini F, Giusti F, Palmini G, Aurilia C, Donati S, and Brandi ML. Parathyroid carcinoma: molecular therapeutic targets. Endocrine. (2023) 81:409–18. doi: 10.1007/s12020-023-03376-w
7. Westin G. Molecular genetics and epigenetics of nonfamilial (sporadic) parathyroid tumours. J Intern Med. (2016) 280:551–8. doi: 10.1111/joim.12458
8. Givi B and Shah JP. Parathyroid carcinoma. Clin Oncol. (2010) 22:498–507. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2010.04.007
9. Vijayakumar R and Büsselberg D. Osteoporosis: An under-recognized public health problem: Local and global risk factors and its regional and worldwide prevalence. J Loc Global Health Sci. (2016) 2016. doi: 10.5339/jlghs.2016.2
10. Walker MD and Shane E. Postmenopausal osteoporosis. N Engl J Med. (2023) 389:1979–91. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp2307353
11. Kanis JA, Burlet N, Cooper C, Delmas PD, Reginster J-Y, Borgstrom F, et al. on behalf of the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis (ESCEO). European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int. (2008) 19:399–428. doi: 10.1007/s00198-008-0560-z
12. Pang H, Chen S, Klyne DM, Harrich D, Ding W, Yang S, et al. Low back pain and osteoarthritis pain: a perspective of estrogen. Bone Res. (2023) 11:42. doi: 10.1038/s41413-023-00280-x
13. Lu R, Zhao W, Yin L, Guo R, Wei B, Jin M, et al. Efficacy of ultrasonography and Tc-99m MIBI SPECT/CT in preoperative localization of parathyroid adenomas causing primary hyperthyroidism. BMC Med Imaging. (2021) 21:87. doi: 10.1186/s12880-021-00616-1
14. Lazzaro A, Zhao G, and Kulke M. Diagnosis and management of parathyroid carcinoma. Clin Pharma Ther. (2024) 116(6):1496–505. doi: 10.1002/cpt.3432
15. Bae JH, Choi HJ, Lee Y, Moon MK, Park YJ, Shin CS, et al. Preoperative predictive factors for parathyroid carcinoma in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. J Kor Med Sci. (2012) 27:890. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2012.27.8.890
16. Scerrino G, Paladino NC, Orlando G, Salamone G, Richiusa P, Radellini S, et al. The nexus of hyperparathyroidism and thyroid carcinoma: insights into pathogenesis and diagnostic challenges—A narrative review. JCM. (2023) 13:147. doi: 10.3390/jcm13010147
17. Li L, Li B, Lv B, Liang W, Zhang B, Zeng Q, et al. Increased thyroid Malignancy in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. Endocr Connect. (2021) 10:885–93. doi: 10.1530/EC-21-0217
18. Kim HJ, Kim BR, Seo YM, Cho YY, Baek JH, Kim KY, et al. Follow-up of thyroid ultrasonography in patients with hemodialysis. Yeungnam Univ J Med. (2017) 34:69–74. doi: 10.12701/yujm.2017.34.1.69
19. Latina A, Castellano E, Cesario F, Boriano A, Attanasio R, and Borretta G. Unknown and already known thyroid abnormalities in primary hyperparathyroidism. Endocr Pract. (2018) 24:628–33. doi: 10.4158/EP-2018-0016
20. Chinese Society of Osteoporosis and Bone Mineral Research. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of primary osteoporosis (2022) [J]. Chinese General Pract. (2023) 26(14):1671–91.
21. Gregson CL, Armstrong DJ, Avgerinou C, Bowden J, Cooper C, Douglas L, et al. The 2024 UK clinical guideline for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Arch Osteoporos. (2025) 20:119. doi: 10.1007/s11657-025-01588-3
22. Osteoporosis prevention, screening, and diagnosis: ACOG clinical practice guideline no. 1. Obstet Gynecol. (2021) 138:494–506. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004514
23. Camacho PM, Petak SM, Binkley N, Diab DL, Eldeiry LS, Farooki A, et al. American association of clinical endocrinologists/american college of endocrinology clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis—2020 update. Endocr Pract. (2020) 26:1–46. doi: 10.4158/GL-2020-0524SUPPL
24. LeBoff MS, Greenspan SL, Insogna KL, Lewiecki EM, Saag KG, Singer AJ, et al. The clinician’s guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int. (2022) 33:2049–102. doi: 10.1007/s00198-021-05900-y
25. Society of Parathyroid and Metabolic Bone Diseases, Rare Diseases Society, Chinese Research Hospital Association. Expert consensus on the management of parathyroid carcinoma. Chin J. Endocrinol. Metabol. (2019) 35:361–8. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1000-6699.2019.05.002.
26. El-Hajj Fuleihan G, Clines GA, Hu MI, Marcocci C, Murad MH, Piggott T, et al. Treatment of hypercalcemia of Malignancy in adults: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. (2023) 108:507–28. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgac621
27. Hadoux J, Lamarca A, Grande E, Deandreis D, Kaltsas G, Janson ET, et al. Neuroendocrine neoplasms of head and neck, genitourinary and gynaecological systems, unknown primaries, parathyroid carcinomas and intrathyroid thymic neoplasms: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. ESMO Open. (2024) 9:103664. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.103664
Keywords: hypercalcemia, hyperparathyroidism, osteoporosis, parathyroid carcinoma, postmenopausal women
Citation: Su J, Lei S, Jin M, Hu H and He W (2026) Parathyroid carcinoma as an overlooked etiology of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women: a case report. Front. Endocrinol. 16:1652919. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1652919
Received: 12 August 2025; Accepted: 30 December 2025; Revised: 28 December 2025;
Published: 23 January 2026.
Edited by:
Giacomina Brunetti, University of Bari Aldo Moro, ItalyReviewed by:
Paraskevi Kazakou, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, GreeceInes Cosme, Santa Maria Local Health Unit, Portugal
Copyright © 2026 Su, Lei, Jin, Hu and He. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Hongzhi Hu, MTM3MjAxMDU3NDZAMTYzLmNvbQ==; Wenshan He, aGV3ZW5zaGFuQGh1c3QuZWR1LmNu