ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Endocrinol.
Sec. Pituitary Endocrinology
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1657520
Associations of MEG3 rs7158663, rs4081134 gene variants and Ki-67, p53, CK18 immunohistochemical markers with clinical features of pituitary neuroendocrine tumors
Provisionally accepted- 1Lietuvos sveikatos mokslu universitetas Medicinos akademija, Kaunas, Lithuania
- 2Neuroscience institute, Lietuvos sveikatos mokslu universitetas Medicinos akademija, Kaunas, Lithuania
- 3Department of Pathology, Lietuvos sveikatos mokslu universitetas, Kaunas, Lithuania
- 4Latvijas Biomedicinas petijumu un studiju centrs, Riga, Latvia
- 5Departament of Neurology, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Tainan City, Taiwan
- 6Department of Neurosurgery, Lietuvos sveikatos mokslu universiteto ligonine Kauno klinikos, Kaunas, Lithuania
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Aim: This study aimed to determine the associations of MEG3 rs7158663, rs4081134 gene variants, as well as the immunohistochemical markers Ki-67, p53, and CK18, with the clinical features of pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs). Methods: This case-control study included 340 individuals who were divided into two groups: a control group (n=220) and a PitNETgroup (n=120). DNA was isolated from the venous blood of study participants by the leukocyte salt precipitation method. Real-time polymerase chain reaction was used for the MEG3 rs7158663, rs4081134 single nucleotide variants genotyping. Immunohistochemical analysis of Ki-67 labeling index and p53 protein biomarkers was performed using the automated Ventana BenchMark ULTRA PLUS staining system, following the manufacturer's recommendations. CK18 immunostaining was conducted with the Dako Omnis staining system, following the manufacturer's recommendations. Monoclonal antibodies SP6, DO-7, and DC-10 were used to detect Ki-67 labeling index, p53, and CK18, respectively. Statistical data analysis was performed using the "IBM SPSS Statistics 30.0" program. Results: Genotype and allele frequencies of MEG3 rs7158663 and rs4081134 variants showed no significant differences between healthy controls and PitNET patient groups. Additionally, no associations were found between either MEG3 variants and PitNET recurrence, size, invasiveness, and functional status. Ki-67 labeling index (>3% vs. ≤3%) showed no significant differences with any clinical feature of PitNETs (recurrence, size, invasiveness, functional status). In contrast, the p53 H-score was significantly higher in macroadenomas than in microadenomas (median 27 vs. 16; p = 0.008). Additionally, invasive pituitary adenomas showed a higher p53 H-score compared with non-invasive tumors (median 27 vs. 20; p = 0.018). Negative CK18 immunostaining was significantly more frequent in invasive than non-invasive PitNETs (44.4% vs. 13.3%; p < 0.001) and in non-functioning compared to functioning adenomas (42.0% vs. 18.4%; p = 0.011). No significant associations were found between either MEG3 variant and Ki-67 LI, p53 H-score, or CK18 immunohistochemical reactions. Conclusions: This study found that a higher p53 H-score was significantly associated with larger PitNET size and invasiveness. Negative CK18 staining was associated with non-functioning and invasive PitNETs. P53 expression and CK18 status may serve as useful prognostic markers in PitNETs.
Keywords: pituitary adenoma, p53, CK18, Ki-67, MEG3, PitNET, Immunohistochemistry, biomarkers
Received: 01 Jul 2025; Accepted: 15 Sep 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Zaliunas, Pileckaite, Duseikaite, Makstiene, Poskiene, ROVITE, Wu, Tamasauskas and Liutkeviciene. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Enrika Pileckaite, enrika.pileckaite@lsmu.lt
Monika Duseikaite, monika.duseikaite@lsmu.lt
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.