Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Endocrinol.

Sec. Thyroid Endocrinology

SWE, C-TIRADS and AI-assisted diagnostic systems in distinguishing thyroid nodules of different lesion size: Which has better diagnostic performance?

Provisionally accepted
Zhou  YuweiZhou Yuwei*Ruifen  liRuifen liWeiwei  ZhengWeiwei ZhengZhaoguang  LiuZhaoguang LiuJing  YangJing YangLei  WangLei Wang
  • Tangshan People's Hospital, Tangshan, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Objective: To compare the diagnostic performance of shear wave elastography (SWE), Chinese Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (C-TIRADS), and an artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted diagnostic system in differentiating thyroid nodules of different sizes. Methods: A total of 103 thyroid nodules in 90 patients were prospectively analyzed and divided into two groups based on the maximum diameter: <10 mm and ≥10 mm. Each thyroid nodule was evaluated using three methods: conventional ultrasound for C-TIRADS scoring, shear wave elastography (SWE), and AI-assisted diagnosis. The diagnostic performance of individual methods and their combinations was assessed within each nodule size group using sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. For combined assessments, a nodule was considered positive if any constituent method indicated malignancy. Intergroup comparisons of AUC values were performed using DeLong's test to evaluate the effect of nodule size on diagnostic performance. Results: In nodules ≥1 cm, AI demonstrated excellent performance (AUC = 0.875, sensitivity = 96.43%, specificity = 77.78%), and C-TIRADS also performed well (AUC = 0.834, sensitivity = 96.55%, specificity = 70.37%). Among SWE parameters, Emax achieved the highest AUC (0.895). The diagnostic efficacy of AI combined with C-TIRADS (AUC = 0.852) was comparable to that of AI + C-TIRADS + Emax. In subcentimeter nodules, diagnostic performance decreased, with AI achieving an AUC of 0.654 and C-TIRADS an AUC of 0.524, whereas Emean retained moderate discriminative ability (AUC = 0.821). Conclusion: AI combined with C-TIRADS provides an efficient and practical strategy for diagnosing thyroid nodules ≥1 cm. For subcentimeter nodules, Emean retains discriminative ability, indicating potential clinical value in assessment of small lesions.

Keywords: Artificial intelligence -assisted diagnostic system, Chinese Thyroid Imaging Reporting andData System, Shear wave elastography, Thyroid Nodule, ultrasound

Received: 22 Aug 2025; Accepted: 09 Dec 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Yuwei, li, Zheng, Liu, Yang and Wang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Zhou Yuwei

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.