Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Endocrinol.

Sec. Cardiovascular Endocrinology

This article is part of the Research TopicCardiorenal Metabolic Health and Diabetic Nephropathy: Mechanisms, Biomarkers, and Therapeutic AdvancesView all articles

Impact of the triglyceride–glucose–neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (TyG-NLR) and the C-reactive protein–TyG index (CTI) on cardio-renal disease in patients with type 2 diabetes

Provisionally accepted
Ying  GuoYing Guo1Hongjian  JiaHongjian Jia2Yan  WangYan Wang2Mengyan  LiMengyan Li3Tong  ChenTong Chen2Zhendong  DiaoZhendong Diao2Xicheng  LiXicheng Li2Jietao  ZhangJietao Zhang2*
  • 1Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University, Jining, China
  • 2The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
  • 3Shandong Second Medical University, Weifang, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: We compared the triglyceride–glucose– neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and a C-reactive protein–TyG–based index to examine their associations with severity outcomes in hospitalized adults with type 2 diabetes. Methods:We conducted a retrospective study of hospitalized adults with type 2 diabetes at the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, classifying cardiorenal disease into four severity levels. Using ordinal logistic regression, we evaluated the independent associations of the C-reactive protein–TyG–based index and the triglyceride–glucose– neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio with severity, performed trend testing, and explored potential nonlinearity with restricted cubic splines . For robustness, we additionally fitted a partial proportional odds model and a multinomial logistic model. Relative to a base covariate model, we assessed the incremental value of these indices in terms of overall model performance , discrimination, calibration , and clinical net benefit via decision-curve analysis. Results:A total of 2,885 patients were included. In multivariable ordinal logistic regression analysis, both higher quartiles of CTI and TyG-NLR were significantly associated with increased disease severity. The Brant test indicated partial violation of the proportional odds assumption; sensitivity analysis using a VGAM-based partial proportional odds model yielded consistent results across thresholds. Trend tests revealed a significant linear increase in disease severity across quartiles for both indices .Restricted cubic spline analysis showed a nonlinear relationship between TyG-NLR and disease severity , with the risk plateauing beyond a TyG-NLR value of approximately 16.64; in contrast, CTI exhibited an approximately linear association.Regarding model performance, the TyG-NLR model achieved the best overall fit, while CTI yielded moderate improvement. In terms of discrimination, the TyG-NLR model attained the highest AUC of 0.680 and the lowest Brier score of 0.476. Calibration curves demonstrated good agreement at all thresholds, with the TyG-NLR model showing the closest alignment with the ideal line.Decision curve analysis indicated that TyG-NLR provided the greatest net clinical benefit across a wide range of threshold probabilities (0.05–0.35), followed by CTI. Both VGAM and multinomial logistic models yielded consistent directions of association, supporting the robustness of these findings. Conclusions:In adults with type 2 diabetes, both CTI and TyG-NLR were independently associated with cardiorenal disease severity.

Keywords: TyG-NLR, cti, Insulin Resistance, systemic inflammation, ordinal severity, cardio-renal-metabolic disease

Received: 30 Oct 2025; Accepted: 27 Nov 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Guo, Jia, Wang, Li, Chen, Diao, Li and Zhang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Jietao Zhang

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.