Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

MINI REVIEW article

Front. Endocrinol., 15 January 2026

Sec. Diabetes: Molecular Mechanisms

Volume 16 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2025.1745162

This article is part of the Research TopicChREBP: A Pivotal Player in Glucose Metabolism and Diabetes TherapeuticsView all articles

Mondo family proteins in diabetes

  • 1Department of Biochemistry, Wake Forest University Medical School, Winston-Salem, NC, United States
  • 2Department of Ophthalmology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States

Carbohydrate-responsive element binding protein (ChREBP) and Max-like protein X (MLX) are key Mondo Family Proteins (MFPs) acting as transcription factors. They are known to couple intracellular sugar levels with carbohydrate and lipid metabolism by regulating glucose-responsive gene expression. MondoA regulates lipid metabolism and insulin signaling in addition to controlling glucose uptake, whereas ChREBP primarily regulates de novo lipogenesis and glycolysis. Differential gene expression data suggest that the expression of MondoA and ChREBP is cell type-specific, which is an important consideration when designing therapeutic strategies to control MFP-regulated transcriptional programs for different tissue-specific systems. In this review, we summarize recent advances made in the research field studying diabetes and its multi-organ complications, including those affecting the kidney, liver, heart, and retina. We also discuss recent advances in MFP-targeted therapies.

1 Introduction

Glucose metabolism plays a pivotal role in fine-tuning cellular energy demands by regulating ATP production through glycolysis and oxidative phosphorylation, while also supplying precursors for the synthesis of essential cellular components. Recent studies highlight the critical importance of transcriptional regulation in maintaining both cellular and systemic energy homeostasis. Beyond serving as a metabolic substrate, glucose acts as a signaling molecule that activates specific transcriptional programs, thereby orchestrating gene expression to align cellular metabolism with nutrient availability. Among the key transcriptional regulators, MondoA and ChREBP (Carbohydrate Response Element-Binding Protein) sense intracellular glucose levels and modulate the expression of genes essential for sustaining energy balance. These two paralogous transcription factors, collectively known as the MondoA Family Proteins (MFPs), play a central role in glucose sensing and transcriptional control of energy metabolism. They regulate genes involved in glucose uptake, glycolysis, lipid biosynthesis, inflammation, and insulin signaling, effectively integrating nutrient-derived signals with metabolic output.

MondoA was first identified in 2000 by the group led by Donald Ayer (1). Initially described as MLX-interacting protein (MLXIP), MondoA was named for its ability to form heterodimers with MLX, a basic helix-loop-helix leucine zipper (bHLH-Zip) transcription factor. The MondoA–MLX complex binds to carbohydrate response elements (ChoREs), which include E-box motifs (CACGTG), in the promoters of glucose-responsive genes. This interaction enables transcriptional regulation in response to intracellular glucose metabolites, particularly glucose-6-phosphate (G6P). In parallel, a novel transcription factor gene named (1) (Williams-Beuren Syndrome Chromosomal Region 14) was cloned and characterized (2). Initially referred to as WS-bHLH, WBSCR14 encodes a protein with a bHLH-Zip domain and a bipartite nuclear localization signal, suggesting its role as a transcription factor. Subsequent studies revealed that WBSCR14 also forms heterodimers with MLX and binds ChoREs in a glucose-dependent manner, particularly regulating lipogenic gene expression. This protein was later renamed MLXIPL (MLX-interacting protein-like) and became widely known as ChREBP. ChREBP is now recognized as a central transcriptional regulator of glucose metabolism, especially in the liver and adipose tissue, where it activates genes involved in glycolysis and lipogenesis in response to elevated glucose levels.

MondoA and ChREBP were subsequently classified as MFPs, transcriptional activators structurally analogous to MYC. They share a conserved N-terminal domain found in Drosophila melanogaster and Caenorhabditis elegans. Unlike MYC, which is constitutively nuclear and promotes cell proliferation, MondoA and ChREBP are localized to the cytoplasm and mitochondria under basal conditions. Their nuclear translocation is tightly regulated by glucose-derived metabolites, especially G6P, positioning them as metabolic sensors that integrate signals from glucose metabolism. Tissue-specific expression patterns further distinguish these paralogs. ChREBP is predominantly expressed in the liver, white and brown adipose tissues, with moderate levels in the kidney, skeletal muscle, and small intestine (3). In contrast, MondoA is most abundantly expressed in skeletal muscle (1), suggesting distinct yet complementary roles in metabolic regulation. Additionally, MondoA forms a complex with MLC that supports mitochondrial function in primary skeletal muscle cells and erythroblasts by upregulating [LDH-A, HKII, and PFKFB3] genes (4), further underscoring its role in organelle-level metabolic integration.

Over the past two decades since the discovery of MondoA and ChREBP, our understanding of the structure and function of MFPs has significantly advanced, particularly in the context of metabolic disorders such as diabetes. Emerging evidence now indicates that these transcription factors also play critical roles in the pathogenesis of diabetic complications, including diabetic nephropathy, cardiomyopathy, and retinopathy. Their ability to integrate nutrient-derived signals with transcriptional programs positions them as key regulators of cellular responses to hyperglycemia and metabolic stress. In this review, we will examine the role of MFPs in the progression of diabetic complications and highlight existing gaps in MFP-based translational research, with the aim of identifying novel therapeutic opportunities and guiding future investigations.

2 Structure and functions of Mondo family proteins

2.1 Structure of ChREBP and MondoA proteins

Both MondoA and ChREBP are multi-domain proteins consisting of 919 and 852 amino acids, respectively. They share highly homologous N- and C-terminal regions, which include five Mondo conserved regions (MCR I–V), separated by a central proline-rich region (Figure 1). In their C-terminal domains, both proteins contain a basic helix–loop–helix–leucine zipper (bHLH/LZ) motif and a dimerization and cytoplasmic localization domain (DCD), which facilitate heterodimerization with MLX and enable DNA binding (5). Transcriptional activity by MondoA and ChREBP involves the formation of a heterotetrameric complex with MLX (6, 7).

Figure 1
Diagram of protein domain structures for four proteins:  A) MLX (298 AA) has bHLH/ZIP and DCD domains.  B) MondoA (919 AA) includes a glucose sensing module with LID and GRACE regions, proline-rich region, bHLH/ZIP, and DCD domains, interacting with CRM1, 14-3-3, importin-α, and MLX.  C) ChREBP-α (852 AA) has similar features to MondoA, with additional phosphorylation sites S196, S568, S626, T666, and K672.  D) ChREBP-β (675 AA) features GRACE, proline-rich region, bHLH/ZIP, and DCD domains, also interacting with MLX.

Figure 1. Schematic representation of structural domains of MFPs. (A) MLX (298 AA), MondoA and ChREBP (α or β isoforms) exhibit highly homologous C-terminal regions, including a basic helix-loop-helix/leucine zipper (bHLH/ZIP) domain and a cytoplasmic localization domain (DCD). The N-terminal regions of (B) MondoA (919 AA); (C) ChREBPα (852 AA) contain a glucose-sensing module (GSM), composed of five conserved Mondo regions (MCRI–V). This module is subdivided into a low-glucose inhibitory domain (LID) and a glucose-response activation conserved element (GRACE). Additionally, the N-terminal region includes (i) two CRM1-dependent nuclear export signals (NES1 and NES2), and (ii) a bipartite nuclear localization signal (NLS) that interacts with importin-α to mediate nuclear import. Between the GSM and the C-terminal domains, constitutive binding of MCRIII to 14–3-3 proteins contribute to cytoplasmic retention, transactivation, and nuclear export of MondoA and ChREBP. A variable proline-rich region is located centrally within the MondoA and ChREBPα sequences. (D). ChREBPβ (675 AA) isoform, lacks the LID domain and MCRI-IV sequence.

The N-terminal domain primarily governs subcellular localization and transactivation in response to intracellular glucose levels. A key regulatory region within this domain is the glucose-sensing module (GSM), which is functionally conserved across both proteins. The GSM comprises two critical subdomains: the low-glucose inhibitory domain (LID) and the glucose-response activation conserved element (GRACE), spanning MCR I–IV and MCR V, respectively (8). The GRACE domain mediates transactivation, while the LID domain suppresses this activity under low-glucose conditions. Elevated glucose levels relieve this inhibition, enabling transcriptional activation. Notably, deletion of the LID domain results in constitutive activation of MondoA/ChREBP, independent of glucose availability. Mutational deletion of individual MCR I–IV abolishes MondoA/ChREBP transactivation in response to glucose, indicating that the entire MCR I–IV domain is essential for the glucose-responsive function of MFPs. The conserved spacing between MCR II, III, and IV further supports the structural integrity of this functional module. Repression of the GRACE domain by the LID domain is proposed to initiate an intramolecular interaction between MCR I–IV and MCR V, inducing a conformational change that inhibits DNA binding and transcriptional activation (9). Disruption of this repressive interaction permits direct binding of glucose metabolites G6P to the MCR I–IV region. Moreover, G6P has been shown to bind allosterically to Mondo proteins within the highly conserved MCR VI region, located within the GRACE domain. This region shares structural similarity with motifs found in glucose phosphate isomerase (GPI) and glutamine:fructose-6-phosphate aminotransferase (GFAT1), and due to its resemblance to a 9-amino-acid motif involved in CBP/p300 interaction, MCR VI has been designated as the transactivation domain (TAD) of Mondo proteins (10).

Detailed structural analyses of the N-terminal region of MondoA and ChREBP has revealed key regulatory elements: 1) Two CRM1-dependent nuclear export signals (NES1 and NES2), with NES2 localized within MCR II; 2) a bipartite nuclear localization signal (NLS) within MCR IV that binds importin-α to mediate nuclear import (1113), and 3) constitutive binding of MCR III to 14–3–3 proteins, which contributes to cytoplasmic retention, transactivation regulation, and nuclear export of MondoA and ChREBP. Additionally, ChREBP is expressed as two isoforms ChREBP-α and ChREBP-β arising from alternative promoter usage and differing in their N-terminal regions. ChREBP-α contains the full regulatory architecture, including LID and GRACE domains, and is subject to glucose-dependent regulation. In contrast, ChREBP-β lacks the LID domain, resulting in constitutive transcriptional activity even under low-glucose conditions (Figure 1).

2.2 Physiological function of MondoA and ChREBP proteins

Both MondoA and ChREBP, play key regulatory roles in maintaining healthy physiological functions across multiple organs. Under healthy metabolic conditions, these MFPs are essential for maintaining glucose homeostasis. However, under chronic nutrient excess, their dysregulation contributes to the development of metabolic disorders, including obesity and diabetes. Both MFPs function in a coordinated manner to fine-tune the expression of regulatory genes involved in the vital metabolic functions. Thus, in response to elevated glucose flux, upon their nuclear translocation, both MFPs bind independently to the MLX protein and recognize ChoREs within the promoters of their target genes, thereby activating transcription. Among these target genes are those involved in lipid metabolism, such as acetyl-CoA carboxylase 1 (ACC), fatty acid synthase (FASN), and stearoyl-CoA desaturase-1 (SCD1), which collectively promote de novo lipogenesis. In addition to their overlapping roles in the regulation of lipid metabolism and TXNIP-mediated activation of nucleotide-binding domain, leucine-rich repeat, and pyrin domain-containing protein 3, mounting evidence suggests that they also play independent in a tissue-dependent context. Therefore, MFPs can be functionally distinguished by their tissue-dependent roles in metabolic pathway regulation. MondoA primarily drives lipid metabolism and insulin signaling, along with the regulation of TXNIP and ARRDC4-mediated glucose uptake (14, 15). In contrast, ChREBP primarily controls de novo lipogenesis and glycolysis (16, 17), although it is also known to regulate TXNIP transcription. For instance, high-fat diet in mice with liver-specific ChREBP overexpression leads to elevated serum triglycerides and inflammatory response (18, 19). Whereas a muscle-specific MondoA knockout, shows reduced expression of genes associated with insulin signaling and fatty acid metabolism (14). Moreover, under normal physiological conditions, MondoA–Mlx complex localizes to the outer mitochondrial membrane (OMM) (4). While ChREBP exhibits punctate cytoplasmic localization in hepatocytes under low glucose condition (20).

MFPs follow a well-defined intracellular pathway in response to elevated glucose conditions, wherein both MondoA and ChREBP undergoes heterodimerization with Mlx, followed by nuclear translocation and binding to ChoREs (2125). However, the activity of ChREBP and MondoA is tightly regulated at multiple levels as glucose-induced nuclear accumulation alone is insufficient for full transactivation of their target genes (21, 22). Several lines of evidence entail that ChREBP/MondoA–Mlx complex activation is triggered by G6P (Figure 2) (26, 27), which is generated after glucose is metabolized by hexokinases or glucokinase that are also localized to the OMM (28). Application of a glucose analog 2-deoxyglucose (2-DG) demonstrates the specific responsiveness of MondoA–Mlx complex to G6P. Notably, 2-DG is phosphorylated into 2-deoxyglucose-6-phosphate (2-DG6P), but it fails to be processed further, leading to 2-DG6P accumulation. While 2-DG itself is a glucose analog and not metabolized beyond phosphorylation, its conversion to 2-DG6P is sufficient to activate MondoA signaling. Upon exposure to 2-DG, the MondoA–Mlx complex translocate into the nucleus and potently transactivates target genes (23).

Figure 2
Diagram comparing low and high glucose conditions affecting metabolic pathways. On the left, low glucose triggers pathways involving glucagon, fatty acids, and AMPK, leading to the phosphorylation of ChREBP. On the right, high glucose activates pathways through glutamine, glucose, and insulin, engaging mTOR, AKT, and SIK2, resulting in different gene transcription processes. Each side demonstrates unique interactions and importation processes affecting target gene expression.

Figure 2. Physiological functions of MondoA/ChREBP under varying nutrient conditions. Activation of MFPs requires nuclear translocation, followed by activation of DNA binding by Mondo/MLX complexes. Mondo proteins are regulated by nuclear/cytosol trafficking mediated by interactions with 14–3–3 proteins, CRM-1, or importin-α. In response to low glucose concentrations, intracellular cAMP upon glucagon release activates PKA, which phosphorylates ChREBP on (Ser 196 and Thr 666) residues located in the NLS and the bHLH/LZ domains, thereby inhibiting ChREBP nuclear import and DNA binding activity, respectively. cAMP also acts by disrupting a ChREBP-HNF4α-CBP complex at target gene promoters in a β-cell line. MondoA has been reported to be localized to the outer mitochondrial membrane under low glucose conditions. In contrast, under high glucose condition, glucose is phosphorylated into glucose-6-phosphate (G6P), which enters glycolysis and the pentose phosphate pathway, generating xylulose-5-phosphate (Xu5P). ChREBP nuclear translocation and DNA binding is facilitated by PP2A-mediated dephosphorylation of Ser196 and Ser568/Thr666. Xu5P selectively activates PP2A in high-glucose environments. G6P may also act as an allosteric activator of ChREBP, while fructose-2,6-bisphosphate (F2,6P2) has emerged as a key metabolite in glucose-induced recruitment of ChREBP and MondoA to target genes. Additionally, glutamine—converted to glutamate and α-ketoglutarate in the TCA cycle has been shown to inhibit MondoA transcriptional activity. Insulin is known to enhance ChREBP activity by inhibiting FoxO1, which increases ChREBP O-GlcNAcylation and stability. Conversely, insulin can suppress MondoA activity via (i) activation of SIK2, which blocks ChREBP acetylation at Lys672 by p300, thereby promoting DNA binding, and (ii) mTOR binding to cytosolic MondoA, preventing MondoA/MLX dimerization.

The role of xylulose 5-phosphate (Xu5P) in mediating ChREBP activation is controversial. Earlier studies that Xu5P activates the ChREBP–Mlx complex by stimulating protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A), which in turn promotes dephosphorylation and activation of the complex (29). However, other findings reported that PP2A activity is dispensable for ChREBP activation in response to glucose, and that dephosphorylation on Ser-196 is not sufficient to promote ChREBP nuclear translocation without increased glucose metabolism. This study reveals that G6P, rather than its downstream metabolite Xu5P, is essential for both ChREBP nuclear translocation and transcriptional activity in response to glucose in liver cells (27). Thus, activation by G6P appears to be a common feature of both MondoA–Mlx and ChREBP–Mlx complexes. As a distinguished feature, the MondoA–Mlx complex also responds to other phosphorylated hexoses, such as allose, 3-O-methylglucose and glucosamine (30), while ChREBP has been shown to be activated by fructose 2,6-bisphosphate in hepatocytes (31).

3 Mondo family proteins in obesity and diabetes

MFPs play crucial role in regulating nutrient metabolism and maintaining energy homeostasis. These transcription factors are central to nutrient sensing in key metabolic organs such as skeletal muscle, liver, adipose tissue, and pancreas. Under normal nutrient conditions, they help preserve metabolic balance. However, under nutrient overload, MondoA and ChREBP directly regulate glucose and lipid metabolism in brown and beige adipocytes and modulate inter-organ communication to coordinate systemic metabolic responses. Dysregulation of these pathways contributes to the development of metabolic diseases, including obesity, insulin resistance, and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) (32). Their activity in thermogenic adipose tissues is particularly important for counteracting obesity and related disorders (3, 33). For example, MondoA’s regulatory function is enhanced under high glucose conditions, which paradoxically impairs insulin sensitivity across various tissues. In skeletal muscle, elevated glucose and fructose levels activate MondoA, leading to the transcription of genes that inhibit insulin signaling and glucose uptake (34). Notably, mice lacking MondoA in skeletal muscle exhibit improved insulin sensitivity and enhanced glucose uptake (35). ChREBP, on the other hand, exhibits tissue-specific and metabolic context-dependent functions. Chronic activation of ChREBP can result in “glucolipotoxicity”, a condition marked by cytotoxicity due to excessive glucose and lipid accumulation. In the liver, high glucose levels activate ChREBP, which induces genes involved in glycolysis and de novo lipogenesis, contributing to hepatic steatosis as observed in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). In adipose tissue, ChREBP promotes triglyceride storage, and while its overexpression can protect against obesity and insulin resistance, dysregulation may provoke inflammation. Interestingly, unlike in rodents, ChREBP is not the primary glucose sensor in human pancreatic β-cells. However, chronic overexpression of the hyperactive isoform ChREBPβ in mouse models has been linked to β-cell apoptosis, loss of β-cell identity, and diabetes (36).

3.1 Mondo family proteins in diabetic kidney disease

MFPs play a complex role in diabetic kidney disease (DKD), primarily by regulating glucose and lipid metabolism within kidney cells (Table 1). Dysregulation of both ChREBP and MondoA under diabetic conditions can lead to cellular damage and metabolic imbalance, driving the progression of kidney disease. Several reports suggest that ChREBP plays important roles in the onset and progression of diabetic nephropathy (3739)., which is well known to develop after long-term duration suffering from diabetes mellitus. ChREBP contributes significantly to DKD pathogenesis due to its overactivation in high-glucose environments. Studies have shown that ChREBP and its pro-inflammatory target TXNIP are overexpressed in the kidneys of both human patients and animal models of T2D. Another study demonstrated that ChREBP-β and TXNIP exacerbate fructose-induced renal injury by triggering ferroptosis in renal tubular epithelial cells (40). By promoting TXNIP expression, the dysregulated ChREBP pathway induces oxidative stress and apoptosis in kidney cells, ultimately leading to diabetic nephropathy. Genetic knockout of ChREBP in mice has been shown to improve kidney function, reduce cell death, and decrease oxidative stress and inflammation in a diabetic environment (28, 41)

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Studies investigating the role of MFPs in diabetes.

3.2 Mondo family proteins in diabetic liver disease

MFPs play a crucial role in diabetic liver disease, with ChREBP emerging as the dominant regulator driving the metabolic dysregulation that leads to NAFLDa common consequence of diabetes and insulin resistance (Table 1). Under hyperglycemic conditions, MFPs activate the transcription of key enzymes involved in de novo lipogenesis, resulting in increased triglyceride synthesis and hepatic lipid accumulation, ultimately causing hepatic steatosis or fatty liver (42). This condition is now more accurately referred to as metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MAFLD). Hepatic ChREBP activation contributes to a vicious cycle of worsening insulin resistance. In diabetic mouse models, liver-specific inhibition of ChREBP improves hepatic insulin sensitivity, whereas its overexpression induces steatosis (13). Notably, the ChREBP isoform β is markedly upregulated in diabetic livers and further enhances lipid synthesis, exacerbating insulin resistance. The liver is particularly susceptible to fructose-induced lipogenesis, a process strongly controlled by ChREBP. High-fructose diets significantly elevate ChREBP activity and are recognized as major contributors to NAFLD progression (43). Although MondoA is predominantly expressed in skeletal muscle, it also plays an important role in diabetic liver disease through inter-organ metabolic crosstalk, functioning in concert with ChREBP. Activated MondoA promotes lipid synthesis and ectopic lipid accumulation, which substantially contribute to systemic hyperglycemia and hyperlipidemia key conditions that further damage the liver. Preclinical studies show that inhibiting MondoA with compounds like SBI-477 can diminish triglyceride levels and alleviate hepatic steatosis, thus highlighting the significance of muscle-liver communication in diabetic liver disease (15). The prominent and distinct roles of ChREBP and MondoA in mediating metabolic dysregulation enlightens them as appealing therapeutic targets for treating diabetes and associated liver disease. Considering its direct involvement in hepatic lipogenesis, inhibiting ChREBP activity in the liver could reduce fat accumulation and improve insulin sensitivity. Furthermore, selective inhibition of MondoA activity could restore systemic insulin resistance and lower the burden of hyperglycemia and hyperlipidemia on the liver. Additional research studies are required to explore the complex interactions and context-dependent effects of MFPs to develop targeted therapeutic strategies.

3.3 Mondo family proteins in coronary heart disease

Dysregulation in the MFPs activity has been implicated in heart diseases, particularly those associated with metabolic disorders. Studies in Drosophila have explored the connection between altered nutrient metabolism and cardiac hypertrophy using genetic tools. Notably, manipulation of molecular pathways involved in glucose and lipid metabolism led to hypertrophic growth in fly hearts (44). The conserved nature of the Mondo-Mlx network and its downstream targets suggests a similar role in human cardiac hypertrophy. Given its high expression in cardiac and skeletal muscle tissues, MondoA is the principal MFP influencing cardiac function. It has been shown to be essential for normal myogenesis and regulation of skeletal muscle glycogen content in mice (34). Cardiac physiology relies heavily on the ability to switch between glucose and fatty acids for energy production. In many cardiac disorders, this dynamic is impaired, a condition known as metabolic inflexibility. The MondoA-Mlx complex is a key regulator of this dynamic, modulating gene expression in response to changes in glucose availability (4). Under hyperglycemic conditions, activation of the MondoA-Mlx complex promotes the conversion of excess glucose into lipids, which can lead to ectopic triglyceride accumulation in non-adipose tissues, including the heart contributing to cardiac dysfunction and insulin resistance. Moreover, metabolic diseases such as T2DM and obesity are major risk factors for cardiovascular diseases. Thus, MondoA-Mlx signaling pathway represents a promising therapeutic target for metabolic and cardiac complications. In mouse models, small molecule inhibitors of MondoA (SBI-477/993) have demonstrated improved glucose tolerance, enhanced insulin sensitivity, and increased glucose uptake in skeletal muscle—highlighting their potential to prevent metabolic dysfunctions that contribute to heart disease (15). However, further research is needed to elucidate the tissue-specific roles and mechanisms of MondoA-Mlx signaling in cardiac pathology. Tissue-specific knockout models and gene-editing approaches may pave the way for targeted therapies for distinct forms of heart disease (Table 1).

3.4 Mondo family proteins in diabetic retinopathy

Due to their key regulatory function in diabetes, MFPs could be explored to better understand the underlying mechanisms of diabetic retinopathy (DR). Although earlier studies have extensively explored the roles of both MFPs in several human metabolic disorders, only a few relevant research reports have focused on the role of ChREBP in the vision field, and to the best our knowledge, no studies to date have investigated MondoA—thus indicating a gap in our understanding of these proteins in the retina (Table 1) (45, 46). It has been proposed that ChREBP-mediated and normoxic HIF-1α activation may be partially responsible for neovascularization in diabetic and age-related retinopathy (46). Furthermore, ChREBP deficiency has been shown to reduce high-glucose-induced apoptosis, migration, and tube formation in human retinal microvascular endothelial cells as well as structural and angiogenic responses in the mouse retina (45). We have demonstrated for the first time that overexpression of MFPs is linked to the progression of DR (47). In this recent study, we showed that ChREBP and MondoA are expressed throughout the retina and upregulated in humans patients and in murine model of DR. Under hyperglycemic conditions, elevated levels of both MondoA and ChREBP in the retina lead to cellular metabolic reprogramming, which contributes to photoreceptor deterioration and vision loss. Mice with constitutively active ChREBP (caChREBP) in photoreceptors exhibit significant changes in retinal protein expression, affecting metabolic, structural, and signaling pathways, further supporting the role of ChREBP in DR. Furthermore, MFPs also regulate genes involved in inflammatory pathways, and their increased activity in the hyperglycemic environment of DR may contribute to the inflammatory processes during disease progression. These findings suggest that targeting ChREBP and MondoA could be a promising strategy for developing novel treatments for DR. Further research is warranted to fully understand which specific retinal cell types and ocular conditions would benefit most from targeting MFPs.

4 Targeting Mondo family proteins in diabetes

MFPs are emerging as promising therapeutic targets for diabetes. Current preclinical strategies focus on inhibiting MondoA in skeletal muscle and modulating ChREBP’s activity in the liver and adipose tissue to address insulin resistance in a tissue-specific manner. Notably, ChREBP can also initiate beneficial signaling pathways, such as the induction of fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21), which enhances insulin sensitivity (48). Given ChREBP’s dual physiological roles, therapeutic approaches aim to modulate rather than completely inhibit its activity. Liver-specific ChREBP inhibitors have shown promise in reducing hepatic fat accumulation and improving insulin sensitivity (13). However, because ChREBP also contributes to protective metabolic function, a well-tuned strategy is required to avoid adverse effects. For instance, selectively modulating ChREBP signaling could preserve its beneficial pathways while limiting its lipogenic activity. Additionally, targeting the ChREBP–FGF21 axis in diabetes could influence insulin sensitivity and blood glucose levels, which are already dysregulated under diabetic conditions (49). Therefore, future MFP-based therapies must carefully weigh the potential benefits against the risks of modulating MFP activity across various diabetic organs and tissues.

In white adipose tissue, ChREBP regulates the synthesis of insulin-sensitizing lipids such as palmitic-acid-hydroxy-stearic-acids (PAHSAs). In obese and diabetic individuals, reduced adipose ChREBP expression and PAHSA production contribute to systemic insulin resistance (50). Restoring ChREBP function in adipose tissue may therefore enhance systemic insulin sensitivity. Therapeutic approaches should emphasize activating adipose ChREBP or enhancing PAHSA biosynthesis to improve metabolic outcomes. In pancreatic β cells, MFPs play a complex, context-dependent role. While MondoA is essential for glucose-stimulated gene expression, prolonged CHREBP activation can lead to β-cell dysfunction and apoptosis—a phenomenon known as glucolipotoxicity. One potential strategy involves the selective inhibition of MondoA to reduce TXNIP-mediated β-cell apoptosis. A more refined approach to modulating ChREBP in β-cells may involve balancing the expression of its isoforms, ChREBP-α and ChREBP-β, to promote cell proliferation without triggering apoptosis. Developing compounds that can target MFPs in a tissue-specific manner such as inhibiting MondoA in muscle while activating ChREBP in adipose tissue remains a major challenge in precision drug development. The lack of resolved crystal structures for key domains of MondoA and ChREBP limits the design of potent and selective modulators. Applications of SBI-477 or its recent analog SBI-993, which exhibits enhanced potency and improved pharmacokinetic properties, along with inhibitors of ChoRE-driven transcriptional activity, could significantly advance research on the role of ChREBP and MondoA in diabetes (51). For example, leveraging this approach may help address critical questions regarding the therapeutic potential of MFP-based strategies in DR.

Furthermore, due to the diverse tissue-specific expression and function of these proteins, systemic administration of therapeutic agents often could often lead to undesirable side effects. Future research should focus on characterizing the full metabolic profile of MFPs across tissues, which will be critical for the rational design of targeted therapies. Advances in tissue-specific knockout models and gene-editing technologies may also pave the way for precision interventions targeting diabetic complications across multiple organs.

Author contributions

SB: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. MBG: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. MSG: Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declared that financial support was not received for this work and/or its publication.

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Billin AN, Eilers AL, Coulter KL, Logan JS, and Ayer DE. MondoA, a novel basic helix-loop-helix-leucine zipper transcriptional activator that constitutes a positive branch of a max-like network. Mol Cell Biol. (2000) 20:8845–54. doi: 10.1128/MCB.20.23.8845-8854.2000

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. de Luis O, Valero MC, and Jurado LA. WBSCR14, a putative transcription factor gene deleted in Williams-Beuren syndrome: complete characterisation of the human gene and the mouse ortholog. Eur J Hum Genet. (2000) 8:215–22. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5200435

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Iizuka K, Bruick RK, Liang G, Horton JD, and Uyeda K. Deficiency of carbohydrate response element-binding protein (ChREBP) reduces lipogenesis as well as glycolysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. (2004) 101:7281–6.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

4. Sans CL, Satterwhite DJ, Stoltzman CA, Breen KT, and Ayer DE. MondoA-Mlx heterodimers are candidate sensors of cellular energy status: mitochondrial localization and direct regulation of glycolysis. Mol Cell Biol. (2006) 26:4863–71. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00657-05

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Filhoulaud G, Guilmeau S, Dentin R, Girard J, and Postic C. Novel insights into ChREBP regulation and function. Trends Endocrinol Metab. (2013) 24:257–68. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2013.01.003

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Stoeckman AK, Ma L, and Towle HC. Mlx is the functional heteromeric partner of the carbohydrate response element-binding protein in glucose regulation of lipogenic enzyme genes. J Biol Chem. (2004) 279:15662–9. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M311301200

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Billin AN, Eilers AL, Queva C, and Ayer DE. Mlx, a novel Max-like BHLHZip protein that interacts with the Max network of transcription factors. J Biol Chem. (1999) 274:36344–50. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.51.36344

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Li MV, Chen W, Poungvarin N, Imamura M, and Chan L. Glucose-mediated transactivation of carbohydrate response element-binding protein requires cooperative actions from Mondo conserved regions and essential trans-acting factor 14-3-3. Mol Endocrinol. (2008) 22:1658–72. doi: 10.1210/me.2007-0560

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Davies MN, O’Callaghan BL, and Towle HC. Activation and repression of glucose-stimulated ChREBP requires the concerted action of multiple domains within the MondoA conserved region. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. (2010) 299:E665–74. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00349.2010

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. McFerrin LG and Atchley WR. A novel N-terminal domain may dictate the glucose response of Mondo proteins. PloS One. (2012) 7:e34803. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034803

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Tsatsos NG, Davies MN, O’Callaghan BL, and Towle HC. Identification and function of phosphorylation in the glucose-regulated transcription factor ChREBP. Biochem J. (2008) 411:261–70. doi: 10.1042/BJ20071156

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Ido-Kitamura Y, Sasaki T, Kobayashi M, Kim HJ, Lee YS, Kikuchi O, et al. Hepatic FoxO1 integrates glucose utilization and lipid synthesis through regulation of Chrebp O-glycosylation. PloS One. (2012) 7:e47231. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047231

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Dentin R, Denechaud PD, Benhamed F, Girard J, and Postic C. Hepatic gene regulation by glucose and polyunsaturated fatty acids: a role for ChREBP. J Nutr. (2006) 136:1145–9. doi: 10.1093/jn/136.5.1145

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Ahn B, Wan S, Jaiswal N, Vega RB, Ayer DE, Titchenell PM, et al. MondoA drives muscle lipid accumulation and insulin resistance. JCI Insight. (2019) 5. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.129119

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Ahn B, Soundarapandian MM, Sessions H, Peddibhotla S, Roth GP, Li JL, et al. MondoA coordinately regulates skeletal myocyte lipid homeostasis and insulin signaling. J Clin Invest. (2016) 126:3567–79.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

16. Iizuka K and Horikawa Y. ChREBP: a glucose-activated transcription factor involved in the development of metabolic syndrome. Endocr J. (2008) 55:617–24. doi: 10.1507/endocrj.K07E-110

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Linden AG, Li S, Choi HY, Fang F, Fukasawa M, Uyeda K, et al. Interplay between ChREBP and SREBP-1c coordinates postprandial glycolysis and lipogenesis in livers of mice. J Lipid Res. (2018) 59:475–87. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M081836

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Benhamed F, Denechaud PD, Lemoine M, Robichon C, Moldes M, Bertrand-Michel J, et al. The lipogenic transcription factor ChREBP dissociates hepatic steatosis from insulin resistance in mice and humans. J Clin Invest. (2012) 122:2176–94.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

19. Nuotio-Antar AM, Poungvarin N, Li M, Schupp M, Mohammad M, Gerard S, et al. FABP4-cre mediated expression of constitutively active chREBP protects against obesity, fatty liver, and insulin resistance. Endocrinology. (2015) 156:4020–32.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

20. Kawaguchi T, Takenoshita M, Kabashima T, and Uyeda K. Glucose and cAMP regulate the L-type pyruvate kinase gene by phosphorylation/dephosphorylation of the carbohydrate response element binding protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. (2001) 98:13710–5.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

21. Davies MN, O’Callaghan BL, and Towle HC. Glucose activates ChREBP by increasing its rate of nuclear entry and relieving repression of its transcriptional activity. J Biol Chem. (2008) 283:24029–38. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M801539200

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Peterson CW, Stoltzman CA, Sighinolfi MP, Han KS, and Ayer DE. Glucose controls nuclear accumulation, promoter binding, and transcriptional activity of the MondoA-Mlx heterodimer. Mol Cell Biol. (2010) 30:2887–95. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01613-09

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Stoltzman CA, Peterson CW, Breen KT, Muoio DM, Billin AN, and Ayer DE. Glucose sensing by MondoA: Mlx complexes: a role for hexokinases and direct regulation of thioredoxin-interacting protein expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. (2008) 105:6912–7.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

24. Eilers AL, Sundwall E, Lin M, Sullivan AA, and Ayer DE. A novel heterodimerization domain, CRM1, and 14-3–3 control subcellular localization of the MondoA-Mlx heterocomplex. Mol Cell Biol. (2002) 22:8514–26. doi: 10.1128/MCB.22.24.8514-8526.2002

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Ma L, Sham YY, Walters KJ, and Towle HC. A critical role for the loop region of the basic helix-loop-helix/leucine zipper protein Mlx in DNA binding and glucose-regulated transcription. Nucleic Acids Res. (2007) 35:35–44. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkl987

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Li FP, Li ZZ, Zhang M, Yan L, and Fu ZZ. Effects of resistin on skeletal glucose metabolism. Front Med China. (2010) 4:329–35.

Google Scholar

27. Dentin R, Tomas-Cobos L, Foufelle F, Leopold J, Girard J, Postic C, et al. Glucose 6-phosphate, rather than xylulose 5-phosphate, is required for the activation of ChREBP in response to glucose in the liver. J Hepatol. (2012) 56:199–209. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2011.07.019

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Gerbitz KD, Gempel K, and Brdiczka D. Mitochondria and diabetes. Genetic, biochemical, and clinical implications of the cellular energy circuit. Diabetes. (1996) 45:113–26.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

29. Kabashima T, Kawaguchi T, Wadzinski BE, and Uyeda K. Xylulose 5-phosphate mediates glucose-induced lipogenesis by xylulose 5-phosphate-activated protein phosphatase in rat liver. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. (2003) 100:5107–12.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

30. Stoltzman CA, Kaadige MR, Peterson CW, and Ayer DE. MondoA senses non-glucose sugars: regulation of thioredoxin-interacting protein (TXNIP) and the hexose transport curb. J Biol Chem. (2011) 286:38027–34. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.275503

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Arden C, Tudhope SJ, Petrie JL, Al-Oanzi ZH, Cullen KS, Lange AJ, et al. Fructose 2,6-bisphosphate is essential for glucose-regulated gene transcription of glucose-6-phosphatase and other ChREBP target genes in hepatocytes. Biochem J. (2012) 443:111–23. doi: 10.1042/BJ20111280

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Ke H, Luan Y, Wu S, Zhu Y, and Tong X. The role of mondo family transcription factors in nutrient-sensing and obesity. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). (2021) 12:653972.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

33. Wei C, Ma X, Su K, Qi S, Zhu Y, Lin J, et al. ChREBP-beta regulates thermogenesis in brown adipose tissue. J Endocrinol. (2020) 245:343–56. doi: 10.1530/JOE-19-0498

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Ran H, Lu Y, Zhang Q, Hu Q, Zhao J, Wang K, et al. MondoA is required for normal myogenesis and regulation of the skeletal muscle glycogen content in mice. Diabetes Metab J. (2021) 45:439–51. doi: 10.4093/dmj.2019.0212

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Imamura M, Chang BH, Kohjima M, Li M, Hwang B, Taegtmeyer H, et al. MondoA deficiency enhances sprint performance in mice. Biochem J. (2014) 464:35–48. doi: 10.1042/BJ20140530

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Katz LS, Brill G, Zhang P, Kumar A, Baumel-Alterzon S, Honig LB, et al. Maladaptive positive feedback production of ChREBPbeta underlies glucotoxic beta-cell failure. Nat Commun. (2022) 13:4423. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-32162-x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Isoe T, Makino Y, Mizumoto K, Sakagami H, Fujita Y, Honjo J, et al. High glucose activates HIF-1-mediated signal transduction in glomerular mesangial cells through a carbohydrate response element binding protein. Kidney Int. (2010) 78:48–59. doi: 10.1038/ki.2010.99

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Park MJ, Kim DI, Lim SK, Choi JH, Han HJ, Yoon KC, et al. High glucose-induced O-GlcNAcylated carbohydrate response element-binding protein (ChREBP) mediates mesangial cell lipogenesis and fibrosis: the possible role in the development of diabetic nephropathy. J Biol Chem. (2014) 289:13519–30. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.530139

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Zhang W, Li X, and Zhou SG. Ablation of carbohydrate-responsive element-binding protein improves kidney injury in streptozotocin-induced diabetic mice. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. (2017) 21:42–7.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

40. Guo H, Fang T, Cheng Y, Li T, Qu JR, Xu CF, et al. ChREBP-beta/TXNIP aggravates frucose-induced renal injury through triggering ferroptosis of renal tubular epithelial cells. Free Radic Biol Med. (2023) 199:154–65. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2023.02.013

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Chen N, Yang Z, Mu L, Wu M, Song J, Zhou T, et al. ChREBP deficiency suppresses renal inflammation and fibrosis via inhibiting NLRP3 inflammasome activation in diabetic kidney disease. Discov Med. (2022) 33:69–83.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

42. Eissing L, Scherer T, Todter K, Knippschild U, Greve JW, Buurman WA, et al. De novo lipogenesis in human fat and liver is linked to ChREBP-beta and metabolic health. Nat Commun. (2013) 4:1528. doi: 10.1038/ncomms2537

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Hall AM and Finck BN. ChREBP refines the hepatic response to fructose to protect the liver from injury. J Clin Invest. (2017) 127:2533–5.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

44. Chatterjee N and Perrimon N. What fuels the fly: Energy metabolism in Drosophila and its application to the study of obesity and diabetes. Sci Adv. (2021) 7. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abg4336

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Sui Y, Du C, Wang M, Liu X, Chai Q, Liang S, et al. Knockdown of ChREBP ameliorates retinal microvascular endothelial cell injury and angiogenic responses in diabetic retinopathy. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. (2024) 694:149389. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2023.149389

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Chang ML, Chiu CJ, Shang F, and Taylor A. High glucose activates ChREBP-mediated HIF-1alpha and VEGF expression in human RPE cells under normoxia. Adv Exp Med Biol. (2014) 801:609–21.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

47. Starr CR, Zhylkibayev A, Gorbatyuk O, Nuotio-Antar AM, Mobley J, Grant MB, et al. Glucose-sensing carbohydrate response element-binding protein in the pathogenesis of diabetic retinopathy. Cells. (2025) 14. doi: 10.3390/cells14020107

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Fisher FM, Kim M, Doridot L, Cunniff JC, Parker TS, Levine DM, et al. A critical role for ChREBP-mediated FGF21 secretion in hepatic fructose metabolism. Mol Metab. (2017) 6:14–21. doi: 10.1016/j.molmet.2016.11.008

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Iizuka K, Takeda J, and Horikawa Y. Glucose induces FGF21 mRNA expression through ChREBP activation in rat hepatocytes. FEBS Lett. (2009) 583:2882–6. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2009.07.053

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Vijayakumar A, Aryal P, Wen J, Syed I, Vazirani RP, Moraes-Vieira PM, et al. Absence of carbohydrate response element binding protein in adipocytes causes systemic insulin resistance and impairs glucose transport. Cell Rep. (2017) 21:1021–35. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.09.091

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

51. You S, Nguyen T, Li-Ma C, and Bollong MJ. Identification of tunable, environmentally responsive fluorogenic dyes by high-throughput screening. ACS Chem Biol. (2024) 19:2041–9. doi: 10.1021/acschembio.4c00373

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: ChREBP, diabetes, glucose metabolism, insulin resistance, MondoA

Citation: Barodia SK, Grant MB and Gorbatyuk MS (2026) Mondo family proteins in diabetes. Front. Endocrinol. 16:1745162. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1745162

Received: 12 November 2025; Accepted: 25 December 2025; Revised: 03 December 2025;
Published: 15 January 2026.

Edited by:

Xiaoliang Shao, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, China

Reviewed by:

Kei Shing Ng, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China

Copyright © 2026 Barodia, Grant and Gorbatyuk. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Marina S. Gorbatyuk, bWFyaW5hLmdvcmJhdHl1a0B3ZnVzbS5lZHU=

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.