Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Endocrinol.

Sec. Clinical Diabetes

This article is part of the Research TopicAssociation of Diabetes Mellitus with Cognitive Impairment and Neurological Disorders Vol. 2View all 16 articles

Association between estimated glucose disposal rate and cognitive impairment in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a cross-sectional study

Provisionally accepted
Tong  ChenTong Chen1,2Hui-Na  QiuHui-Na Qiu1Xin-Ping  ZhangXin-Ping Zhang3Fan  WuFan Wu1Yan-Lan  LiuYan-Lan Liu1Jing-Bo  LiJing-Bo Li1Jing-Na  LinJing-Na Lin1,2*
  • 1Department of Endocrinology, The Affiliated Hospital of Nankai University, Tianjin, China
  • 2School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, China
  • 3Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Peking University BinHai Hospital, Tianjin, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Insulin resistance (IR) is a fundamental pathophysiological characteristic of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and is intricately related to neurodegeneration. This study sought to investigate the correlation between estimated glucose disposal rate (eGDR), an easily accessible and effective indicator of IR, and cognitive impairment (CI) in elderly patients with T2DM. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 871 elderly patients with T2DM. The eGDR was calculated from glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), waist circumference and hypertension status to evaluate the extent of IR in patients. Cognitive function was assessed in all participants utilizing the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Linear and logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate the association between eGDR and cognitive function. Restricted cubic spline (RCS) analysis and threshold effect analysis were conducted to elucidate the nonlinear relationship between eGDR and CI. Results: The eGDR levels were significantly lower in the CI group compared to the normal cognition group. Linear regression analysis indicated that eGDR was positively correlated with MoCA scores when expressed as continuous or categorical data after fully adjusting for covariates. Logistic regression analysis revealed that, after adjusting for all covariates, each unit increase in eGDR was associated with an 8% reduction in the risk of CI (OR: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.85-0.99, P<0.05). Participants in the highest eGDR quartile exhibited a 38% lower risk of CI compared to those in the lowest eGDR quartile (OR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.39-0.99, P<0.05). RCS analysis and threshold effect analysis demonstrated a nonlinear relationship between eGDR and CI (P for non-linearity=0.001). When eGDR was<6.36 mg/kg/min, the risk of CI decreased with increasing eGDR levels (OR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.61-0.86, P<0.001). However, no significant association was observed when eGDR was≥6.36 mg/kg/min. Sensitivity analysis revealed a significant linear positive correlation between homeostatic model assessment (HOMA)2-IR and the risk of CI. Conclusion: In elderly patients with T2DM, eGDR is significantly associated with cognitive function, exhibiting a nonlinear relationship with the risk of CI. This finding provides novel insights for the prevention and management of CI.

Keywords: cognitive impairment, elderly patients, Estimated glucose disposal rate, Insulinresistance, type 2 diabetes mellitus

Received: 22 Aug 2025; Accepted: 02 Feb 2026.

Copyright: © 2026 Chen, Qiu, Zhang, Wu, Liu, Li and Lin. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Jing-Na Lin

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.