Abstract
Objectives:
To assess the prevalence and determinants of macrovascular complications (coronary artery disease, stroke, and diabetic foot) among adults living with T2DM in rural Bangladesh.
Methods:
A population-based cross-sectional study was conducted between December 2023 and September 2024, involving 1094 adults with diagnosed T2DM from rural areas of three regions/divisions in Bangladesh. Data were collected through household interviews, physical examination, and medical record reviews. Macrovascular complications were identified using clinical criteria and documented diagnosis. The leverage of six machine learning (ML) algorithms were applied in identifying influential variables associated with these complications.
Results:
The prevalence of coronary artery disease (CAD), stroke, and diabetic foot was 11.2%, 5.3%, and 9.1%, respectively. The Light Gradient Boosting Machine algorithm performed best for CAD and diabetic foot, with ROC values of 98.8% and 92.6%, respectively, while Random Forest showed the best performance for stroke with a ROC of 99%. These models also outperformed others across accuracy, precision, F1 score, and calibration. Across models, common predictors included older age, longer diabetes duration, diabetes onset at age 45 years or above, and smoking. Hypertension and elevated cholesterol were linked to CAD and stroke. Coexisting microvascular complications were also identified.
Conclusions:
This study identified a substantial burden of macrovascular complications among rural adults with T2DM, with CAD, stroke, and diabetic foot emerging as the most prevalent outcomes. Advanced age, longer duration of diabetes, smoking, hypertension, and elevated cholesterol were consistently associated with these complications, highlighting the need for intensified cardiometabolic risk control within primary care. These findings underscore the urgency of strengthening integrated diabetes–cardiovascular management in rural Bangladesh to reduce the progression and impact of these major vascular outcomes.
1 Introduction
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is an escalating global health concern, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where majority of new cases are emerging (1). In 2024, an estimated 589 million adults were living with diabetes globally, and this number is projected to rise to 853 million by 2050 (1). This increase is especially pronounced in developing countries, driven by rapid urbanization and lifestyle changes (2). Bangladesh, a developing country in the South-East Asia region, bears one of the highest burdens, with a national adult (aged 20–79 years) diabetes prevalence of 13.2% reported in 2024 (1). One of the most serious consequences of T2DM is the development of macrovascular complications, which significantly contribute to morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs (3).
Macrovascular complications in people with T2DM result from insulin resistance and chronic hyperglycaemia, which damage large blood vessels. These complications include coronary artery disease (CAD), stroke, and peripheral vascular disease (PVD)—often presenting as diabetic foot (4). Individuals with diabetes are two to four times more likely to develop cardiovascular disease than the general population and have a two to five times greater risk of dying from these conditions (5). Cardiovascular complications affect up to 80% of people with T2DM and are responsible for approximately 65% of deaths in this population (6, 7).
While macrovascular complications are common, their prevalence varies across populations. Globally, approximately 12.7% of people with T2DM experience macrovascular complications, with the highest rates observed in South-East Asia (26.7%) and the lowest in Europe (4.0%) (8). Specific complications include CAD (8.2%), heart failure (3.3%), stroke (2.2%), and PVD (1.2%). In LMICs, reported prevalence rates vary widely ranging from 1–40% for PVD, 5–10% for myocardial infarction, and 1–27% for ischemic heart disease (8). In Bangladesh, studies have reported a varied prevalence of macrovascular complications: 25.8% to 31.8% for CAD, 10.1% to 12.7% for stroke, and 12% to 13.4% for diabetic foot (9, 10). Although population-based data on macrovascular complications remain limited, hospital-based and clinical studies suggests a substantial burden. A multicentre study of adults with T2DM reported CAD in approximately 30.5% of participants, stroke in 10.1%, and diabetic foot in 12.0% of participants (9). Similarly, a tertiary-care hospital study found that over half of individuals with diabetes had at least one macrovascular complication, with CAD present in 31.8% and stroke in 12.7% (10). Another hospital-based study documented CAD prevalence of 25.8%, stroke at 11%, and PVD at 14% among individuals with T2DM (11). These findings, while not population-based, highlight a considerable burden of macrovascular complications among people with diabetes in Bangladesh and underscore the need for community-level evidence.
In contrast to high-income countries (HICs), where improved glycaemic control and early intervention have reduced diabetes-related complications, LMICs like Bangladesh face persistent challenges. Delayed diagnosis, limited access to healthcare, and poor adherence to treatment continue to impede effective prevention and management (12). People with T2DM in rural areas are particularly vulnerable due to low health literacy, inadequate screening, and limited access to specialist care (13).
Although some data exist from hospital-based or mostly urban studies, there is limited evidence on the burden and determinants of macrovascular complications among people with T2DM in rural settings. Understanding the prevalence and associated risk factors in these communities is essential for informing integrated and locally appropriate strategies for prevention and care. Previous studies have primarily relied on classical regression methods to identify associated factors. In contrast, machine learning (ML) algorithms are increasingly recognised in public health for their ability to uncover complex risk factor patterns and improve outcome prediction. Unlike traditional approaches, ML can analyse large and diverse datasets, capture nonlinear relationships, and offers considerable promise for strengthening health outcomes, particularly in resource-constrained settings. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the prevalence of major macrovascular complications such as CAD, stroke, and diabetic foot among adults with T2DM living in rural Bangladesh, and to identify the key socio-demographic, clinical, and behavioural factors associated with these outcomes.
2 Methods
2.1 Study design and setting
This population-based cross-sectional study was conducted in rural Bangladesh between December 2023 and September 2024, as part of a broader research initiative on glycaemic control, major complications, and comorbidities among individuals with T2DM. Data were collected from villages within three union parishads, the lowest administrative units in rural Bangladesh, across three divisions (the highest administrative regions). The selection of divisions was guided by diabetes prevalence: Dhaka division, with the highest reported prevalence (15%), was purposively selected, while Rajshahi and Khulna divisions were randomly chosen from those with moderate prevalence levels (ranging from 5.6% to 10.9%) (14). In each division, one district was selected, followed by one upazila (subdistrict) from that district. From each upazila, one union parishad was randomly chosen, and the villages within these union parishads served as the data collection sites.
2.2 Sample size and participants
The sample size was calculated based on a study that assessed glycaemic control using haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels (15). Using a 95% confidence level, 5% significance level, 2.5% margin of error, and an estimated 70% prevalence of inadequate glycaemic control from a previous study in Bangladesh (15), the required sample size was determined to be 1098 participants. This same sample was also used to assess the prevalence of diabetes-related complications. Finally, 1094 adults (aged ≥18 years) with diagnosed T2DM were recruited for the study. This sample size also maintains similar or better power for macrovascular complications.
2.3 Data collection
The data collection process comprised three key components: a structured questionnaire, physical examination, and medical record review. A semi-structured, interviewer-administered questionnaire in English was initially developed based on existing literature and validated instruments, with input from a multidisciplinary team including epidemiologists and medical professionals. To ensure linguistic and conceptual accuracy, the questionnaire was translated into Bangla and then back-translated into English by bilingual experts. A panel of reviewers assessed all versions to establish semantic and construct validity. The questionnaire was pre-tested among 24 eligible participants to evaluate its clarity, feasibility, and reliability. The pilot results demonstrated high internal consistency, with an overall Cronbach’s alpha of 0.93 (Supplementary Material: Appendix 1).
Community engagement played a vital role in participant recruitment. Local influencers including teachers, religious leaders, elders, and community representatives, were consulted to support awareness and foster trust. Informational flyers outlining the study objectives were distributed at community hubs such as shops, religious institutions, and schools. Word-of-mouth referrals further facilitated outreach. A trained research team consisting of a diabetes nurse, field supervisor, and local assistants conducted household visits, starting from the periphery of each village. Prospective participants were informed about the study, and written informed consent was obtained from eligible individuals (99.6%) after providing them with an explanatory statement.
Interviews were conducted to collect information on socio-demographics, diabetes-related history, lifestyle behaviours, comorbidities, and complications. Medical records were reviewed using a checklist to extract information on blood tests, diagnosed diseases, and medications. Standardised procedures were followed to measure anthropometric measurements, including height, weight, and waist and hip circumference, as well as blood pressure (BP).
2.4 Outcome variables
Complications were identified through a combination of medical record review, clinical assessment, and patient self-reporting. CAD was determined based on documented diagnoses, a history of relevant medical procedures, or the use of medications prescribed for CAD management. A history of stroke was established either through medical documentation indicating a prior cerebrovascular accident or self-reported events consistent with stroke symptoms in the past. Diabetic foot was assessed through direct visual inspection for foot ulcers, deformities, or amputations, in addition to any documented diagnosis in the medical record.
2.5 Explanatory variables
The explanatory variables included socio-demographic characteristics (age, gender, education, occupation, marital status, individual and family income, and family size), lifestyle and behavioural factors (history of smoking and smokeless tobacco, physical activity), and clinical characteristics (duration of diabetes, age at onset of diabetes, type of diabetes treatment, list of medications, glycaemic control, body mass index, waist-hip ratio, and history of hypertension). Comorbidities and complications such as dyslipidaemia, retinopathy, neuropathy, and nephropathy were also recorded from medical records.
2.6 Operational definitions
Glycaemic control was assessed using HbA1c levels, categorised as adequate (<7%) or inadequate (≥7%) (16). Physical activity was assessed using a modified version of the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ) (17). Diabetes-related distress was measured using the 17-item Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS17/BDDS17) (18, 19). Body Mass Index (BMI) was classified according to WHO guidelines for the Asian population: underweight (≤18.50 kg/m²), normal (18.50–22.99 kg/m²), overweight (23.00–27.49 kg/m²), and obese (≥27.50 kg/m²) (20). WHR was evaluated using cut-off points specific to the Asian population: 85 cm for men and 75–85 cm for women (21). Hypertension was defined as systolic BP ≥140 mmHg and/or diastolic BP ≥90 mmHg, a prior medical diagnosis, or current use of antihypertensive medication. Dyslipidaemia was defined as either a documented diagnosis or the use of lipid-lowering medications. Neuropathy was identified through a documented diagnosis or a score of 7 or more on the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument (22).
2.7 Statistical analysis
Data collection, storage, and management were carried out using the Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) software (23). Continuous variables were summarised as means with standard deviations (SD) or medians with interquartile ranges, while categorical variables were described using frequencies and percentages. A two-step approach was employed for variable selection, integrating both conventional statistical techniques and machine learning (ML) methods. Initially, univariate analyses were conducted using the chi-square test to assess associations between the outcome variable and potential predictors. Simultaneously, the Boruta algorithm, a machine learning technique based on the random forest classifier, was applied to evaluate the relative importance of variables (Supplementary Figure S1). This combined strategy enhanced the robustness of variable selection by leveraging the complementary strengths of traditional statistics and ML.
Based on existing literature, following six ML algorithms were selected: Extra Trees Classifier (ETC), Gradient Boosting (GB), Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LGB), Random Forest (RF), and Support Vector Machine (SVM) and logistic regression (LR) (24–26). All statistical analyses were conducted using Stata version 17, R version 4.4.1, and Python (via the Anaconda platform). A p-value of ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant.
2.7.1 Predictive variable selection and model evaluation
Variable selection is a critical step in enhancing model performance and simplifying analysis by identifying the most relevant variables within a dataset. To determine the most influential variables, SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) were employed (27).
Model optimisation was achieved through hyperparameter tuning combined with 5-fold cross-validation. In this approach, the dataset was divided into five equal subsets; during each iteration, four subsets (80%) were used for training the model and one subset (20%) for testing. Performance metrics, including the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision, recall, F1 score, Brier score, and calibration, were computed and averaged across all folds. The algorithm demonstrating the best overall performance was selected as the final predictive model.
2.7.2 Model parsimony
Parsimony in the optimal ML algorithm was achieved by balancing model simplicity with predictive performance, as measured by the area under the ROC curve. SHAP values were used to rank variable importance, and the least influential variable was sequentially removed in an iterative process. After each exclusion, the model was recalibrated and reassessed. This process continued until an optimal subset of variables was identified, minimising the number of variables while maintaining high discriminative performance.
2.7.3 Risk quantification
ML algorithm uses nonparametric approach to identify the most influential variables that enhance the model’s predictive accuracy. Hence, it neither quantifies the risk associated with a variable nor relies on statistical significance. To complement this, the top influential variables selected by ML algorithm can be added to classical LR model to quantify the risk.
2.8 Ethics approval
Written informed consent was obtained from all participants, with thumbprints used for those who were illiterate. Ethical approval was granted by the Monash University Human Research Ethics Committee (MUHREC, Project No. 39979) and the Ethical Review Committee of the Bangladesh University of Health Sciences (Memo No. BUHS/ERC/EA/23/54).
3 Results
3.1 Sociodemographic and life-style behaviours
A total of 1094 individuals with T2DM were included in the study, of whom 72.6% were women. The mean age of participants was 51.4 ± 12.1 years. Most participants (94.1%) had an education level below secondary school, and approximately 69% were housewives (Table 1). The average duration of diabetes was 6.8 ± 6.1 years.
Table 1
| Variables | Total | CAD** | Stroke | Diabetic foot | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N = 1094 | n = 123 | n = 58 | n = 100 | ||||
| n (%) | n (%) | p-value* | n (%) | p-value* | n (%) | p-value* | |
| Socio-demographics | |||||||
| Gender | |||||||
| Male | 300 (27.4) | 40 (13.3) | 0.179 | 25 (8.3) | 0.006 | 23 (7.7) | |
| Female | 794 (72.6) | 83 (10.5) | 33 (4.2) | 77 (9.7) | 0.928 | ||
| Age group (years) | |||||||
| 18-39 | 167 (15.3) | 7 (4.2) | 2 (1.2) | 6 (3.6) | |||
| 40-59 | 614 (56.1) | 67 (10.9) | 30 (4.9) | 61 (9.9) | |||
| ≥60 | 313 (28.6) | 49 (15.7) | 0.001 | 26 (8.3) | 0.003 | 33 (10.5) | 0.025 |
| Current marital status | |||||||
| Unmarried | 150 (13.7) | 19 (12.7) | 6 (4.0) | 13 (8.7) | |||
| Married | 944 (86.3) | 104 (11.0) | 0.552 | 52 (5.5) | 0.444 | 87 (9.2) | 0.828 |
| Education level | |||||||
| Up to secondary school | 1029 (94.1) | 115 (11.2) | 0.779 | 53 (5.1) | 97 (9.4) | 0.192 | |
| Above secondary school | 65 (5.9) | 8 (12.3) | 5 (7.7) | 0.375 | 3 (4.6) | ||
| Employment status | |||||||
| Employed | 257 (23.5) | 30 (11.7) | 14 (5.4) | 17 (6.6) | |||
| Housewives | 758 (69.3) | 77 (10.2) | 31 (4.1) | 75 (9.9) | |||
| Retired | 79 (7.2) | 16 (20.2) | 0.025 | 13 (16.5) | <0.001 | 8 (10.1) | 0.275 |
| Family size | |||||||
| Small (≤4 people) | 636 (58.1) | 75 (11.8) | 0.498 | 30 (4.7) | 60 (9.4) | 0.692 | |
| Large (>4 people) | 458 (41.9) | 48 (10.5) | 28 (6.1) | 0.309 | 40 (8.7) | ||
| Family income (BDT) | |||||||
| <=20000 TK | 900 (82.3) | 102 (11.3) | 0.839 | 49 (5.4) | 85 (9.4) | ||
| >20000 TK | 194 (17.7) | 21 (10.8) | 9 (4.6) | 0.650 | 15 (7.7) | 0.453 | |
| Lifestyle factor | |||||||
| Smoking | |||||||
| Never smoked | 966 (88.3) | 96 (9.9) | 45 (4.7) | 86 (8.9) | |||
| Past/current smoker | 128 (11.7) | 27 (21.1) | <0.001 | 13 (10.2) | 0.009 | 14 (10.9) | 0.453 |
| Smokeless tobacco | |||||||
| Never used | 775 (70.8) | 79 (10.2) | 40 (5.2) | 73 (9.4) | |||
| Past/current user | 319 (29.2) | 44 (13.8) | 0.087 | 18 (5.6) | 0.747 | 27 (8.5) | 0.618 |
| Physical activity | |||||||
| Active | 307 (28.1) | 39 (12.7) | 0.340 | 14 (4.6) | 25 (8.1) | ||
| Inactive | 787 (71.9) | 84 (10.7) | 44 (5.6) | 0.494 | 75 (9.5) | 0.475 | |
Sociodemographic characteristics and life-style behaviours of the study participants.
*p-value representing univariate association between exposures and complications. Bold values are statistically significant (p < 0.05); CAD, Coronary artery disease; Physical activity: active: >150 minutes of walking per week.
3.2 Clinical characteristics
A family history of diabetes and hypertension was reported by 36.5% and 32.6% of participants, respectively. Dyslipidaemia was present in 13.5% of the sample. Hypertension (defined as BP ≥140/90 mmHg) was found in 62.8% of participants. Regarding diabetes treatment, 50.9% were on a single oral antidiabetic drug (OAD), 31.1% were on a combination of OADs, and 16.8% were using either a combination of OADs and insulin or insulin alone (Table 2). None of the participants used insulin pumps or continuous glucose monitoring devices.
Table 2
| Variables | Total | CAD** | Stroke | Diabetic foot | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N = 1094 | n = 123 | n = 58 | n = 100 | ||||
| n (%) | n (%) | p-value* | n (%) | p-value* | n (%) | p-value* | |
| Clinical characteristics | |||||||
| Diabetes duration group | |||||||
| ≤5 years | 461 (42.1) | 46 (10.0) | 21 (4.6) | 37 (8.0) | |||
| 6–10 years | 440 (40.2) | 45 (10.2) | 19 (4.3) | 41 (9.3) | |||
| >10 years | 193 (17.7) | 32 (16.6) | 0.035 | 18 (9.3) | 0.023 | 22 (11.4) | 0.388 |
| Age of DM onset | |||||||
| ≤45 years | 617 (56.4) | 54 (8.8) | 28 (4.5) | 55 (8.9) | |||
| >45 years | 477 (43.6) | 69 (14.5) | 0.003 | 30 (6.3) | 0.200 | 45 (9.4) | 0.767 |
| Diabetes treatment | |||||||
| One oral medicine | 574 (50.9) | 57 (9.9) | 30 (5.2) | 55 (9.6) | |||
| More than one oral medicine | 335 (31.1) | 34 (10.1) | 12 (3.6) | 22 (6.6) | |||
| Insulin only | 77 (7.0) | 13 (16.9) | 5 (6.5) | 8 (10.4) | |||
| Oral medicine + insulin | 107 (9.8) | 19 (17.8) | 0.039 | 11 (10.3) | 0.058 | 15 (14.0) | 0.111 |
| Glycaemic control | |||||||
| Adequate | 256 (23.4) | 38 (14.8) | 0.037 | 18 (7.0) | 0.158 | 17 (6.6) | |
| Inadequate | 838 (76.6) | 85 (10.1) | 40 (4.8) | 83 (9.9) | 0.113 | ||
| Dyslipidaemia | |||||||
| No | 946 (86.5) | 57 (6.0) | 20 (2.1) | 76 (8.0) | |||
| Yes | 148 (13.5) | 66 (44.6) | <0.001 | 38 (25.7) | <0.001 | 24 (16.2) | 0.001 |
| Body Mass Index | |||||||
| Underweight/Normal | 432 (39.5) | 38 (8.8) | 27 (6.3) | 48 (11.1) | |||
| Overweight | 449 (41.0) | 58 (12.9) | 23 (5.1) | 40 (8.9) | |||
| Obese | 213 (19.5) | 27 (12.7) | 0.117 | 8 (3.8) | 0.403 | 12 (5.6) | 0.074 |
| Waist-hip ratio | |||||||
| Low | 61 (5.6) | 7 (11.5) | 6 (9.8) | 11 (18.0) | 0.008 | ||
| Moderate | 153 (14.0) | 17 (11.1) | 7 (4.6) | 7 (4.6) | |||
| High | 880 (80.4) | 99 (11.2) | 0.997 | 45 (5.1) | 0.257 | 82 (9.3) | |
| Hypertension | |||||||
| No | 407 (37.2) | 14 (3.4) | 8 (2.0) | 23 (5.6) | |||
| Yes | 687 (62.8) | 109 (15.9) | <0.001 | 50 (7.3) | <0.001 | 77 (11.2) | 0.002 |
| CAD | |||||||
| No | 971 (88.8) | – | 15 (1.5) | 78 (8.0) | |||
| Yes | 123 (11.2) | – | 43 (35.0) | <0.001 | 22 (17.9) | <0.001 | |
| Stroke | |||||||
| No | 1036 (94.7) | 80 (7.7) | – | 88 (8.5) | |||
| Yes | 58 (5.3) | 43 (74.1) | <0.001 | – | 12 (20.7) | 0.002 | |
| Diabetic foot | |||||||
| No | 994 (90.9) | 101 (10.2) | 46 (4.6) | – | |||
| Yes | 100 (9.1) | 22 (22.0) | <0.001 | 12 (12.0) | <0.001 | – | |
| Retinopathy | |||||||
| No | 968 (88.5) | 76 (7.9) | 35 (3.6) | 65 (6.7) | |||
| Yes | 126 (11.5) | 47 (37.3) | <0.001 | 23 (18.2) | <0.001 | 35 (27.8) | <0.001 |
| Nephropathy | |||||||
| No | 1062 (97.1) | 108 (10.2) | 58 (4.7) | 86 (8.1) | |||
| Yes | 32 (2.9) | 15 (46.9) | <0.001 | 8 (25.0) | <0.001 | 14 (43.8) | <0.001 |
| Neuropathy | |||||||
| No | 897 (82.0) | 85 (9.5) | 37 (4.1) | 61 (6.8) | |||
| Yes | 197 (18.0) | 38 (19.3) | <0.001 | 21 (10.7) | <0.001 | 39 (19.8) | <0.001 |
| Diabetes distress | |||||||
| Little or no distress | 331 (30.3) | 36 (10.9) | 18 (5.4) | 51 (15.4) | <0.001 | ||
| Moderate distress | 394 (36.0) | 32 (8.1) | 10 (2.5) | 20 (5.1) | |||
| High distress | 369 (33.7) | 55 (14.9) | 0.012 | 30 (8.1) | 0.003 | 29 (7.9) | |
Clinical characteristics of the study participants.
*p-value representing univariate association between exposures and complications. Bold values are statistically significant (p < 0.05); CAD, Coronary artery disease; DM, Diabetes mellitus; **Glycaemic control: adequate: HbA1c <7%, inadequate: HbA1c ≥7%; ¥BMI, body mass index (kg/m2): underweight: ≤18.50, normal: 18.50–22.99, overweight: 23.00–27.49, and obese: ≥ 27.50; Waist-hip ratio: low: ≤90 cm for men and ≤80 cm for women; moderate: >90 to ≤95 cm for men, >80 to ≤85 cm for women; high: >95 cm for men, >85 cm for women; ⁋Hypertension: present: systolic blood pressure ≥140 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mmHg; ‡Diabetes distress: present: ≥2.
3.3 Prevalence of macrovascular complications
The prevalence of CAD, stroke, and diabetic foot was 11.2%, 5.3%, and 9.1%, respectively. All three complications were more prevalent among individuals aged ≥60 years and those with comorbid conditions such as hypertension, dyslipidaemia, retinopathy, nephropathy, and neuropathy. CAD was also more common among those with a history of smoking, a diabetes duration of ≥10 years, those with adequate glycaemic control and those using both OAD and insulin, and individuals experiencing high diabetes distress. Stroke was significantly more prevalent among males, individuals with a history of smoking and those on combined OAD and insulin therapy, and those reporting high diabetes distress. Diabetic foot was notably associated with low waist-hip ratio and high levels of diabetes distress (Table 2).
3.4 Performance metrics of ML algorithms
Table 3 shows the performance metrics of six ML algorithms. Based on ROC and other performance metrics, the best performing models were LGBM for CAD and diabetic foot, and RF for stroke. The ROC values of LGBM for CAD and diabetic foot were 96.2% (95% CI: 92.4%–99.9%) and 92.6% (95% CI: 86.8%–98.2%), respectively, and that of RF for stroke was 98.5% (95% CI: 97.2%–99.9%). These models also showed improved calibration which was measured by calibration curve (Supplementary Figure S2) and brier score.
Table 3
| Outcome | MLA* | Measurement metrics | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROC | CI | Accuracy | Sensitivity | Specificity | Precision | Recall | F1-score | Brier score | ||
| CAD | RF | 0.939 | 0.891-0.985 | 0.93 | 0.36 | 0.99 | 0.93 | 0.68 | 0.74 | 0.07 |
| GBC | 0.500 | 0.414-0.585 | 0.89 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.44 | 0.50 | 0.47 | 0.11 | |
| ETC | 0.911 | 0.855-0.966 | 0.92 | 0.32 | 0.99 | 0.94 | 0.66 | 0.72 | 0.08 | |
| SVM | 0.861 | 0.793-0.927 | 0.91 | 0.35 | 0.98 | 0.83 | 0.67 | 0.71 | 0.09 | |
| LGBM | 0.962 | 0.924-0.999 | 0.94 | 0.63 | 0.99 | 0.91 | 0.81 | 0.85 | 0.06 | |
| LR | 0.883 | 0.820-0.945 | 0.91 | 0.34 | 0.98 | 0.83 | 0.66 | 0.71 | 0.09 | |
| Stroke | RF | 0.985 | 0.972-0.999 | 0.99 | 0.98 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.001 |
| GBC | 0.500 | 0.378-0.621 | 0.95 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.47 | 0.50 | 0.49 | 0.053 | |
| ETC | 0.953 | 0.891-0.999 | 0.95 | 0.16 | 0.99 | 0.93 | 0.58 | 0.62 | 0.045 | |
| SVM | 0.914 | 0.834-0.993 | 0.96 | 0.16 | 0.99 | 0.93 | 0.58 | 0.62 | 0.043 | |
| LGBM | 0.980 | 0.961-1.010 | 0.98 | 0.79 | 0.99 | 0.97 | 0.90 | 0.93 | 0.016 | |
| LR | 0.936 | 0.867-0.999 | 0.96 | 0.43 | 0.98 | 0.77 | 0.71 | 0.74 | 0.040 | |
| Diabetic foot |
RF | 0.880 | 0.810-0.949 | 0.91 | 0.04 | 1.00 | 0.96 | 0.52 | 0.52 | 0.087 |
| GBC | 0.500 | 0.406-0.593 | 0.91 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 0.50 | 0.48 | 0.091 | |
| ETC | 0.852 | 0.775-0.927 | 0.91 | 0.05 | 1.00 | 0.96 | 0.53 | 0.52 | 0.086 | |
| SVM | 0.792 | 0.706-0.876 | 0.91 | 0.02 | 1.00 | 0.96 | 0.51 | 0.50 | 0.091 | |
| LGBM | 0.926 | 0.868-0.982 | 0.93 | 0.43 | 0.99 | 0.85 | 0.71 | 0.76 | 0.068 | |
| LR | 0.602 | 0.505-0.698 | 0.91 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 0.50 | 0.48 | 0.091 | |
Prediction performance metrics of various machine learning algorithms for CAD, stroke and diabetic foot.
*MLA, Machine learning algorithm; ROC, receiver operating characteristics; CI, confidence interval; CAD: Coronary artery disease; RF: Random Forest; GBC: Gradient Boosting Classifier; ETC: Extra Trees Classifier; SVM: Support Vector Machine; LGBM: Light Gradient Boosting Machine; LR: Logistic regression. Higher metric values indicate better prediction. F1 score balances precision and recall, with higher values reflecting stronger performance. Brier score measures the mean squared difference between predicted probabilities and actual outcomes, where lower values indicate better accuracy.
3.5 Predictive variables in the best-performing algorithms
Figure 1 presents a Beeswarm plot, which offers a compact visual summary of how different variables influence the model’s predictions. Variables are ranked by importance, with those at the top (e.g. age) having the greatest impact. The horizontal axis displays SHAP values, where positive values indicate a higher likelihood of complication and negative values suggest its absence. Each dot represents an individual participant, with red indicating higher variable values and blue representing lower values. For numerical variables, the colour gradient reflects actual measurement values, while for categorical variables, it denotes assigned statistical codes.
Figure 1

Most influential variables ranked from highest to lowest by LGBM and RF models for (A) CAD, (B) Stroke, and (C) Diabetic foot. LGBM, Light Gradient Boosting Machine; RF, Random Forest; CAD, Coronary artery disease.
According to this plot, the top 10 variables associated with CAD are age, hypertension, cholesterol level, retinopathy, smoking, BMI, physical activity, stroke, age of diabetes onset, and duration of diabetes. For stroke, the most important predictors include age, CAD, hypertension, cholesterol level, diabetes distress, BMI, employment status, duration of diabetes, age of diabetes onset, and smoking. The key variables linked to diabetes foot are age, diabetes distress, retinopathy, neuropathy, BMI, glycaemic control, physical activity, duration of diabetes, hypertension, and cholesterol level.
The plot highlighted age as the most influential variable across all three macrovascular complications, with older individuals more likely to experience these outcomes. Additionally, a longer duration of diabetes and onset of diabetes at an older age were predictors of all three complications. Hypertension and high cholesterol levels were consistently associated with increased risk of CAD and stroke. The presence of retinopathy was common predictor across CAD, stroke and diabetic foot, while neuropathy specifically contributed to diabetic foot. Smoking was strongly linked to both CAD and stroke, and also emerged as a key variable for diabetic foot. Lower levels of diabetes distress and lower BMI were notably associated with both stroke and diabetic foot, whereas higher BMI was related to CAD.
In addition to ranking predictors, the plot illustrates the direction and variability of effects, with wider SHAP value distributions indicating substantial inter-individual heterogeneity. Higher levels of hypertension, cholesterol, smoking, older age and longer diabetes duration were consistently associated with increased risk, whereas greater lower BMI showed protective effects across models.
3.6 Risk quantification of key influential predictive variables
To quantify the risk of macrovascular complications associated with variables identified in the ML algorithms, top 10 variables related to each complication were applied to a multiple LR model (Supplementary Table S1). For example, individuals with hypertension and high cholesterol levels had 2.9-fold (95% CI: 1.48–5.81) and 4.9-fold (95% CI: 2.90–8.40) higher odds of CAD, respectively. Additionally, being overweight and obese was associated with 75% (95% CI: 1.01–3.06) and 54% (95% CI: 0.78–3.04) increased odds of developing CAD. Similar to CAD, high cholesterol levels had 9.2-fold (95% CI: 4.06–21.07) higher odds of stroke. Individuals with retinopathy and neuropathy had 3.9-fold (95% CI: 2.32–6.46) and 3.7-fold (95% CI: 2.25–6.19) higher odds of diabetic foot, respectively.
4 Discussion
This study estimated the prevalence of macrovascular complications and applied ML algorithms to identify factors associated with these conditions among individuals with T2DM in rural Bangladesh. A considerable burden of disease was observed, with CAD, stroke, and diabetic foot present in 11.2%, 5.3%, and 9.1% of participants, respectively. In terms of predictive modelling, this study demonstrated that ML algorithms offer valuable insights into the determinants of macrovascular complications. Across the best-performing models (LGBM and RF), older age, longer diabetes duration, hypertension, elevated cholesterol, smoking, physical inactivity, and diabetes-related distress appeared as influential predictors for each complication.
Previous studies have highlighted important rural–urban differences in the prevalence of diabetes and its complications in South Asia, including Bangladesh. A nationally representative study reported diabetes prevalence of 10.8% in urban areas compared to 7.4% in rural populations, consistent with broader regional patterns where urban-to-rural prevalence ratios range from 1.2 to 3.5 (28, 29). The higher prevalence in urban settings is often attributed to sedentary lifestyles, dietary transitions, and greater obesity rates (30). However, once diabetes develops, rural populations may experience a disproportionate burden of complications due to delayed diagnosis, limited access to specialist care, poor medication adherence, and lower awareness of disease management (31). Moreover, glycaemic control is often reported to be poorer among rural residents, even after accounting for socioeconomic factors such as food insecurity. This suboptimal control may contribute to faster disease progression and a higher risk of complications over time (32). A hospital-based study in Bangladesh reported urban prevalence of CAD, stroke, and diabetic foot at 30.5%, 10.1%, and 12.0%, respectively (9), whereas our rural community-based findings were substantially lower. This disparity likely reflects under-diagnosis in rural areas due to limited access to specialised care, diagnostic equipment, and trained professionals. Financial barriers and the absence of health insurance further restrict access to essential tests, while poor health literacy and low awareness delay care-seeking. Moreover, rural health systems have traditionally prioritised infectious diseases over chronic conditions such as diabetes. Consequently, macrovascular complications are probably under-detected and under-reported, meaning the true burden may be far higher than current estimates. These findings are consistent with evidence from South Asia showing that, despite lower diabetes prevalence in rural areas, rural people often present with more advanced disease and poorer outcomes (10, 33). This highlights the urgent need to strengthen screening, early detection, and integrated care in rural settings to reduce disparities in complications between urban and rural populations.
Hypertension and high cholesterol emerged as major predictors of CAD and stroke in this study, reinforcing their central role in atherosclerotic disease development among people with T2DM, particularly with poor glycaemic control. In a large prospective cohort study, hypertension was associated with an 89% higher risk of cerebrovascular disease, while dyslipidaemia and elevated triglycerides increased CAD risk by nearly 50% (34, 35). Similar associations between hypertension, dyslipidaemia, and cardiovascular disease have been reported in large regional and multi-country studies (e.g., INTERHEART; PURE) (36, 37). Accordingly, both European and American guidelines recommend intensive BP control and statin therapy for all people with diabetes, along with glucose-lowering agents that offer cardiovascular benefits, especially for those with existing cardiovascular disease (38, 39). More than three-quarters of this study participants had poor glycaemic control and about two-thirds had hypertension. However, one-fourth of the hypertensive participants were not taking antihypertensive medications as prescribed, with half of them citing financial difficulties, while limited use of lipid-lowering therapy was also observed, both of which may contribute to excess cardiovascular risk. Moreover, although newer classes of glucose-lowering medications glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have been shown to reduce cardiovascular events and mortality through both glycaemic and extra-glycaemic effects and are recommended as first-line therapy for high-risk individuals, their use remains scarce in resource-constrained settings (31). In the current study, none of the participants were using GLP-1 receptor agonists, and a small proportion reported using dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors (25%) and SGLT2 inhibitors (4.5%), with most relying on metformin and sulphonylureas.
Smoking showed a strong association with all three macrovascular complications in this study, in line with previous evidence demonstrating smoking as a modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity and diabetic foot (40). This study also found that higher BMI was associated with CAD. This is consistent with the previous studies reporting that overweight and obese individuals with diabetes have significantly higher risks of CAD compared with those of normal weight (41). Higher BMI increases CAD risk by promoting chronic inflammation, insulin resistance, dyslipidaemia, and hypertension, which are key drivers of atherosclerosis (42). It also contributes to a prothrombotic state and often coexists with other risk factors like poor glycaemic control and metabolic syndrome, compounding cardiovascular risk (43).
The presence of retinopathy across all three complications reflects the interplay between systemic vascular pathology and both microvascular and macrovascular damage (43). Advanced age, longer diabetes duration and onset of diabetes at 45 years or above were also associated with all three complications, aligning with the cumulative effects of prolonged hyperglycaemia and progressive vascular injury (44). These findings are also consistent with the previous studies that have reported similar associations between age-related factors and macrovascular complications (45).
Interestingly, diabetes distress showed a negative association with stroke and diabetic foot, while physical activity was negatively associated with diabetic foot. These findings may reflect reverse causality (46), whereby individuals who develop severe complications receive greater medical attention, counselling, or family support, which can reduce their reported distress despite poorer clinical outcomes. Similarly, patients with diabetic foot may limit activity due to mobility restrictions, leading to paradoxical associations in self-reported physical activity levels. Additionally, potential measurement and reporting bias, particularly in self-reported distress or activity levels, may contribute to these counterintuitive findings. These issues highlight the need for longitudinal designs and objective measures in future research.
In rural Bangladeshi communities, several contextual and structural factors may help explain the prominence of the identified determinants. Limited access to structured diabetes education, inadequate dietary counselling, and strong cultural reliance on carbohydrate-based staple foods contribute to poor glycaemic control and elevated cardiometabolic risk. Sedentary lifestyle patterns, further accentuated by occupational transitions from agriculture to shop-based or domestic work, have increased central adiposity and hypertension risk among adults in these areas. Additionally, healthcare-seeking behaviours are often delayed due to low risk perception, high out-of-pocket treatment costs, and irregular follow-up, collectively limiting continuity of diabetes care. Social norms and caregiving priorities may also commonly place men’s occupational demands and women’s household responsibilities above regular health monitoring, leading to suboptimal adherence to medication and lifestyle recommendations. These contextual constraints provide a plausible explanation for the metabolic and behavioural patterns observed and underscore the importance of culturally adapted intervention strategies.
The findings of this current study have important clinical implications. Integrating cardiovascular risk assessments into routine diabetes care could support earlier detection and intervention in rural communities. Emphasis should be placed on controlling blood pressure and lipids, promoting physical activity, supporting smoking cessation, and addressing psychosocial stressors to reduce macrovascular risk. Improving the availability and affordability of essential medications through subsidies and community-based programmes may further enhance adherence to diabetes management and improve long-term outcomes.
4.1 Strengths and limitations
This large-scale, community-based study utilised a representative sample from three rural regions in Bangladesh, strengthening the generalisability of the findings to similar rural populations. The use of a validated electronic questionnaire ensured consistency and reliability in data collection. Moreover, selecting best-performing machine learning algorithms to identify key predictors of macrovascular complications provided a data-driven complement to traditional statistical analyses, enriching the robustness of the results.
Nonetheless, the cross-sectional nature of the study limits the ability to infer temporal or causal relationships between risk factors and health outcomes. While the sample was representative of the selected rural areas, its geographic restriction to three regions may constrain the applicability of findings to the national context. Additionally, reliance on self-reported data for variables such as diet, physical activity, and medication adherence introduces the potential for recall bias, which may affect data accuracy.
5 Conclusions
This study highlights a considerable burden of macrovascular complications among adults with T2DM in rural Bangladesh. Key predictors included older age, longer diabetes duration, hypertension, high cholesterol, and smoking. Concurrent microvascular complications were also observed. The use of machine learning enhanced risk factor identification, supporting targeted prevention strategies. Importantly, although rural lifestyles are often perceived as inherently protective, ongoing socio-economic transitions, dietary shifts toward refined carbohydrates, and declining physical activity have increased cardiometabolic risk in these communities, underscoring the need for context-specific lifestyle interventions. For the prevention of complications, our findings underscore the importance of improving HbA1c control, lowering BP, and, where appropriate, initiating statin therapy to lower cholesterol level. Strengthening routine screening, promoting culturally appropriate lifestyle modifications, and implementing integrated chronic care are therefore crucial for reducing complications in rural, low-resource settings.
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Ethics statement
The studies involving humans were approved by The Monash University Human Research Ethics Committee and the Ethical Review Committee of the Bangladesh University of Health Sciences. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.
Author contributions
BS: Data curation, Methodology, Validation, Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing – review & editing, Formal analysis, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Project administration, Software. DM: Supervision, Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization. MM: Writing – review & editing, Validation. AA: Supervision, Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing. BB: Writing – review & editing, Methodology, Investigation, Project administration, Validation, Supervision, Resources, Conceptualization.
Funding
The author(s) declared that financial support was not received for this work and/or its publication. BNS is supported by Australian Government Research Training Program (RTP) Scholarships.
Conflict of interest
The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
The author BB declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fendo.2026.1724957/full#supplementary-material
References
1
International Diabetes Federation . IDF Diabetes Atlas. 11th edition. Brussels, Belgium: International Diabetes Federation (2025).
2
Hu FB . Globalization of Diabetes: The role of diet, lifestyle, and genes. Diabetes Care. (2011) 34:1249–57. doi: 10.2337/dc11-0442
3
Nathan DM . Long-term complications of diabetes mellitus. New Engl J Med. (1993) 328:1676–85. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199306103282306
4
Fowler MJ . Microvascular and macrovascular complications of diabetes. Clin Diabetes. (2011) 29:116–22. doi: 10.2337/diaclin.29.3.116
5
Gregg EW Sattar N Ali MK . The changing face of diabetes complications. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. (2016) 4:537–47. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(16)30010-9
6
Buse JB Ginsberg HN Bakris GL Clark NG Costa F Eckel R et al . Primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases in people with diabetes mellitus: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association and the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care. (2007) 30:162–72. doi: 10.2337/dc07-9917
7
Kirkman MS McCarren M Shah J Duckworth W Abraira C VADT Study Group et al . The association between metabolic control and prevalent macrovascular disease in Type 2 diabetes: the VA Cooperative Study in diabetes. J Diabetes its Complications. (2006) 20:75–80. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2005.06.013
8
Kosiborod M Gomes MB Nicolucci A Pocock S Rathmann W Shestakova MV et al . Vascular complications in patients with type 2 diabetes: prevalence and associated factors in 38 countries (the DISCOVER study program). Cardiovasc Diabetol. (2018) 17:150. doi: 10.1186/s12933-018-0787-8
9
Afroz A Zhang W Loh AJW Lee DX Billah B . Macro-and micro-vascular complications and their determinants among people with type 2 diabetes in Bangladesh. Diabetes Metab Syndrome: Clin Res Rev. (2019) 13:2939–46. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2019.07.046
10
Alam M Jahan F Islam M Islam SF Hossain MK Hossain RM et al . Prevalence of Macrovascular Complications among Diabetic Patients at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Bangladesh. Sch J App Med Sci. (2025) 6:1301–07. doi: 10.36347/sjams.2025.v13i06.010
11
Haque HF Afroz F Afroze SR Mitra P Rahim MA Ahmed AS et al . Frequency and risk factors of diabetic complications among selected group of diabetic patients: real-life scenario from a developing country, Bangladesh. BIRDEM Med J. (2017) 7:143–7. doi: 10.3329/birdem.v7i2.32453
12
Atun R Davies JI Gale EA Bärnighausen T Beran D Kengne AP et al . Diabetes in sub-Saharan Africa: from clinical care to health policy. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. (2017) 5:622–67. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30181-X
13
Jennings HM Morrison J Akter K Haghparast-Bidgoli H King C Ahmed N et al . Care-seeking and managing diabetes in rural Bangladesh: a mixed methods study. BMC Public Health. (2021) 21:1445. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11395-3
14
Hossain MB Khan MN Oldroyd JC Rana J Magliago DJ Chowdhury EK et al . Prevalence of, and risk factors for, diabetes and prediabetes in Bangladesh: Evidence from the national survey using a multilevel Poisson regression model with a robust variance. PloS Global Public Health. (2022) 2:e0000461. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000461
15
Afroz A Ali L Karim MN Alramadan MJ Alam K Magliano DJ et al . Glycaemic control for people with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Bangladesh-an urgent need for optimization of management plan. Sci Rep. (2019) 9:10248. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-46766-9
16
American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee . 6. Glycemic targets: standards of medical care in diabetes—2022. Diabetes Care. (2022) 45:S83–96. doi: 10.2337/dc22-S006
17
Armstrong T Bull F . Development of the world health organization global physical activity questionnaire (GPAQ). J Public Health. (2006) 14:66–70. doi: 10.1007/s10389-006-0024-x
18
Polonsky WH Fisher L Earles J Dudl RJ Lees J Mullan J et al . Assessing psychosocial distress in diabetes: development of the diabetes distress scale. Diabetes Care. (2005) 28:626–31. doi: 10.2337/diacare.28.3.626
19
Akter J Islam RM Chowdhury HA Selim S Biswas A Mozumder TA et al . Psychometric validation of diabetes distress scale in Bangladeshi population. Sci Rep. (2022) 12:562. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-04671-0
20
Cho J Juon H-S . Assessing overweight and obesity risk among Korean Americans in California using World Health Organization body mass index criteria for Asians. Preventing chronic Dis. (2006) 3:A79.
21
Qiao Q Nyamdorj R . The optimal cutoff values and their performance of waist circumference and waist-to-hip ratio for diagnosing type II diabetes. Eur J Clin Nutr. (2010) 64:23–9. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2009.92
22
Moghtaderi A Bakhshipour A Rashidi H . Validation of Michigan neuropathy screening instrument for diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. (2006) 108:477–81. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2005.08.003
23
Harris PA Taylor R Thielke R Payne J Gonzalez N Conde JG et al . Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inf. (2009) 42:377–81. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010
24
Abbas HT Alic L Erraguntla M Ji JX Abdul-Ghani M Abbasi QH et al . Predicting long-term type 2 diabetes with support vector machine using oral glucose tolerance test. PloS One. (2019) 14:e0219636. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219636
25
Ebrahim OA Derbew G . Application of supervised machine learning algorithms for classification and prediction of type-2 diabetes disease status in Afar regional state, Northeastern Ethiopia 2021. Sci Rep. (2023) 13:7779. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-34906-1
26
Hama Saeed MA . Diabetes type 2 classification using machine learning algorithms with up-sampling technique. J Electrical Syst Inf Technol. (2023) 10:8. doi: 10.1186/s43067-023-00074-5
27
Lundberg SM Lee S-I . A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst. (2017) 30.
28
Talukder A Sara SS Hossain MT Nath CD Rahman R Hussain S et al . Rural and urban differences in the prevalence and determinants of Type-2 diabetes in Bangladesh. PloS One. (2024) 19:e0298071. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298071
29
Jayawardena R Ranasinghe P Byrne NM Soares MJ Katulanda P Hills AP et al . Prevalence and trends of the diabetes epidemic in South Asia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health. (2012) 12:380. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-380
30
Gong JY Sajjadi SF Motala AA Shaw JE Magliano DJ . Variation in type 2 diabetes prevalence across different populations: the key drivers. Diabetologia. (2025) 68:2327–39. doi: 10.1007/s00125-025-06478-4
31
Mohan V Khunti K Chan SP Filho FF Tran NQ Ramaiya K et al . Management of type 2 diabetes in developing countries: balancing optimal glycaemic control and outcomes with affordability and accessibility to treatment. Diabetes Ther. (2020) 11:15–35. doi: 10.1007/s13300-019-00733-9
32
Kamruzzaman M Horowitz M Rahman MS Deshmukh H Jones KL Marathe CS et al . Glycemic control is worse in rural compared to urban type 2 diabetes in Bangladesh, irrespective of food security status. J Diabetes Invest. (2025) 16:1112–18. doi: 10.1111/jdi.70015
33
Govindarajan Venguidesvarane A Jasmine A Varadarajan S Varadarajan S Shriraam V Muthuthandavan AR et al . Prevalence of vascular complications among type 2 diabetic patients in a rural health center in South India. J Primary Care Community Health. (2020) 11:2150132720959962. doi: 10.1177/2150132720959962
34
Abu-Lebdeh HS Hodge DO Nguyen TT . Predictors of macrovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Mayo Clinic Proc. (2001) 76:707–12. doi: 10.4065/76.7.707
35
Adare AF Tiyare FT Marine BT . Time to development of macrovascular complications and its predictors among type 2 diabetes mellitus patients at Jimma University Medical Center. BMC Endocrine Disord. (2024) 24:252. doi: 10.1186/s12902-024-01782-3
36
Yusuf S Hawken S Ôunpuu S Dans T Avezum A Lanas F et al . Effect of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with myocardial infarction in 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): case-control study. Lancet. (2004) 364:937–52. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17018-9
37
Joseph P Kutty VR Mohan V Kumar R Mony P Vijayakumar K et al . Cardiovascular disease, mortality, and their associations with modifiable risk factors in a multi-national South Asia cohort: a PURE substudy. Eur Heart J. (2022) 43:2831–40. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac249
38
Piepoli MF Hoes AW Agewall S Albus C Brotons C Catapano AL et al . 2016 European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice. Polish Heart J (Kardiologia Polska). (2016) 74:821–936. doi: 10.5603/KP.2016.0120
39
Fox CS Golden SH Anderson C Bray GA Burke LE De Boer IH et al . Update on prevention of cardiovascular disease in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus in light of recent evidence: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association and the American Diabetes Association. Circulation. (2015) 132:691–718. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000230
40
Pan A Wang Y Talaei M Hu FB Wu T . Relation of active, passive, and quitting smoking with incident type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. (2015) 3:958–67. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(15)00316-2
41
Tseng C-H . Body mass index and waist circumference as determinants of coronary artery disease in Taiwanese adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Int J Obes. (2006) 30:816–21. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803218
42
Khafagy R Dash S . Obesity and cardiovascular disease: the emerging role of inflammation. Front Cardiovasc Med. (2021) 8:768119. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.768119
43
Samad F Ruf W . Inflammation, obesity, and thrombosis. Blood J Am Soc Hematol. (2013) 122:3415–22. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-05-427708
44
Stratton IM Adler AI Neil HAW Matthews DR Manley SE Cull CA et al . Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): prospective observational study. bmj. (2000) 321:405–12. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7258.405
45
Nanayakkara N Ranasinha S Gadowski A Heritier S Flack JR Wischer N et al . Age, age at diagnosis and diabetes duration are all associated with vascular complications in type 2 diabetes. J Diabetes its Complications. (2018) 32:279–90. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2017.11.009
46
Sattar N Preiss D . Reverse causality in cardiovascular epidemiological research: more common than imagined? Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Hagerstown, MD (2017) 135:2369–72. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.028307
Summary
Keywords
Bangladesh, coronary artery disease, diabetic foot, machine learning algorithm, macrovascular complications, stroke, Type 2 diabetes
Citation
Siddiquea BN, Magliano DJ, Matin M, Afroz A and Billah B (2026) Macrovascular complications in type 2 diabetes: a multiregional study in rural Bangladesh. Front. Endocrinol. 17:1724957. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2026.1724957
Received
14 October 2025
Revised
25 December 2025
Accepted
05 January 2026
Published
26 January 2026
Volume
17 - 2026
Edited by
Saidur Mashreky, North South University, Bangladesh
Reviewed by
Edward Kurnia Setiawan Limijadi, Diponegoro University, Indonesia
Hind Mousa, Thi Qar University, Iraq
Updates
Copyright
© 2026 Siddiquea, Magliano, Matin, Afroz and Billah.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Bodrun Naher Siddiquea, bodrun.siddiquea1@monash.edu
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.