ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Endocrinol.
Sec. Bone Research
Sex and Age Specific Bone Mineral Density Trends in Sri Lankan Adults Support the Need for Normative Reference Data
Muhundhapriya Varatharajan 1
Sachith P Abeysundara 2
Mohan Lal Jayatilake 3
Sachith Abhayaratna 4
Padma Badra Hewavithana 1
1. Faculty of Medicine, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka
2. Department of Statistics and Computer Science, Faculty of Science, University of Peradeniya., Peradeniya, Sri Lanka
3. University of Peradeniya Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka
4. Durdans Hospital, Colombo 3, Colombo, Sri Lanka
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Abstract
Bone Mineral Density (BMD) is a critical determinant of osteoporosis diagnosis and fracture risk. Absence of normative BMD data for Sri Lankans has necessitated reliance on Caucasian references, potentially misestimating the BMD. This study aimed to establish age-related BMD trends for optimal bone health management. A retrospective correlational analysis was conducted on 10,946 adults (4,005 men, 6,941 women; 21–80 years) who underwent lumbar spine and hip scans using Hologic Dual Energy X-ray absorptiometry at five private health institutions in Western Province. Individuals with conditions affecting bone metabolism were excluded. BMD values showed strong positive correlations across lumbar spine and hips (ρ = 0.61 - 0.94, p < 0.001) with negligible bias between hips (mean difference ≈ 0.003 g/cm²). Minor right - left hip differences appeared only in 21–30 age group (p < 0.05). Males had consistently higher BMD than females. In females, lumbar BMD peaked at 31–40 years (0.980 g/cm²) and declined thereafter (F = 279.76, p < 0.001; η² = 0.156); hip BMD peaked at 41–50 years (~0.95 g/cm²) and declined after 50 years (~0.04–0.06 g/cm²/decade). In males, lumbar BMD peaked at 31-40 years (0.997 g/cm²) with modest decline (F = 4.73, p < 0.001; η² = 0.006), while hip BMD remained stable until 60, then decreased (~0.03 g/cm²/decade). Contralateral hip BMD showed strong symmetry, supporting the reliability of single-hip measurements in clinical practice. Higher body mass index was positively associated with BMD in both sexes, particularly in women. Years since menopause accounted for a substantial portion of variance (15%-19%) in BMD, with trabecular-rich lumbar spine exhibiting faster early loss compared to cortical-rich hips, which declined more gradually in later decades. Compared with white reference data, Sri Lankan participants displayed consistently lower BMD, with the greatest deficits observed in postmenopausal women (up to 15% lower), highlighting the need for population-specific reference ranges. These findings demonstrate the need for population-specific BMD reference values to improve diagnostic accuracy and guide clinical management of osteoporosis and osteopenia, particularly in postmenopausal women and older adults.
Summary
Keywords
BMD, Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry, healthy population, Normative, Sri Lanka
Received
17 November 2025
Accepted
17 February 2026
Copyright
© 2026 Varatharajan, Abeysundara, Jayatilake, Abhayaratna and Hewavithana. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Muhundhapriya Varatharajan
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.