Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Endocrinol.

Sec. Reproduction

Clinical Characteristics and Associated Risk Factors for Diminished Ovarian Reserve among Chinese Women: A Matched Case-Control Study

Provisionally accepted
Fan  ZhaoFan Zhao1Penghao  LiPenghao Li2Ruobing  MeiRuobing Mei3,4,5Chongbi  HuangChongbi Huang1Dongsen  HuDongsen Hu2Tony  CheungTony Cheung4Yajiao  LuYajiao Lu1Pulin  LuoPulin Luo2Lucas  Gonzalo GarayLucas Gonzalo Garay4Ying  YangYing Yang1Dandan  ZhaoDandan Zhao1Juan  YangJuan Yang2Jing  LiJing Li1*Leesa  LinLeesa Lin3,4,5
  • 1Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
  • 2Sichuan Jinxin Women's and Children's Hospital, Chengdu, China
  • 3London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
  • 4Laboratory of Data Discovery for Health, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR China
  • 5The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) has emerged as a significant reproductive challenge and a broader societal concern. Most previous studies have focused on ovarian reserve markers, while limited research has examined DOR as a primary outcome, and the potential association between TORCH infections (toxoplasmosis, others, rubella, cytomegalovirus, herpes) and DOR risk remains unclear. Methods: A matched case–control study was conducted among women aged 20–47 years who sought assisted reproductive technology at a maternity hospital in Sichuan, China, between January 2022 and August 2024. DOR was diagnosed according to the Consensus on clinical diagnosis and management of diminished ovarian reserve from China. Age-matched controls (1:1) with normal ovarian reserve were selected. Conditional logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with DOR, with multivariable models adjusting for confounders. Subgroup analyses by age and body mass index (BMI) were conducted to examine robustness and effect modification. Results: A total of 3,751 DOR cases were matched to 3,751 controls (median age: 36 years). DOR group had significantly higher FSH, E2, and LH levels (P < 0.01), and lower AFC, AMH, PRL, and T levels (P < 0.001) compared to controls. Multivariable logistic regression showed that non-Han ethnicity (OR = 1.278, 95% CI: 1.115–1.466), manual labor (OR = 1.181, 95% CI: 1.002–1.392), obesity (OR = 1.316, 95% CI: 1.044–1.660), light menstrual flow (OR = 1.262, 95% CI: 1.111–1.435), and T. gondii infection (OR = 2.292, 95% CI: 1.683–3.122) were independently associated with DOR. In women aged 20–35 years, ≥2 pregnancies (OR = 0.712, 95% CI: 0.615–0.824), and infections with T. gondii (OR = 23.750, 95% CI: 13.330-42.316), CMV (OR = 8.189, 95% CI: 5.821-11.521), and RV (OR = 8.132, 95% CI: 5.806-11.390) were strongly associated with DOR, with no such associations observed in the 36–47 years group. Significant age interactions were detected (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Ethnicity, obesity, menstrual flow, pregnancy history, and TORCH infections were significantly associated with DOR, with age-related effect modification observed for pregnancy history and infections. Prospective studies are needed to elucidate the underlying mechanisms, particularly the role of infections and immune response.

Keywords: age, China, diminished ovarian reserve, matched case–control study, Risk factors

Received: 15 Dec 2025; Accepted: 06 Feb 2026.

Copyright: © 2026 Zhao, Li, Mei, Huang, Hu, Cheung, Lu, Luo, Garay, Yang, Zhao, Yang, Li and Lin. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Jing Li

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.