Introduction
Macrophages are involved in inflammation from induction to resolution. Polarization of macrophages along the M1 (classical) or M2 (alternative) axis occurs during inflammation and can be at least partly categorized by the route of arginine metabolism within the macrophage, balancing the activities of the arginase and nitric oxide synthase (NOS) enzyme families (, ). Arginase activity is associated with tissue repair responses (via ornithine production and pro-proliferative effects). In contrast, NOS2 generates nitric oxide (NO) species with anti-proliferative effects that is necessary for protection against pathogens and aberrant cells (, ). Other NOS enzymes produce NO that acts in the regulation of smooth muscle tone and other cellular processes (). Macrophages preferentially expressing the arginase or NOS2 pathways enzymes also influence T-cell activation, proliferation, signaling, and apoptosis in different ways ().
While arginase and NOS enzymes can be used to ascertain the pathway of macrophage activation in rodents, there has been debate as to whether they are present in macrophages from humans and other mammals. The arginase and NOS enzymes are extensively conserved, and the NOS forms found in mammals are similar to those in cnidarians, mollusks, and other chordates (, ). These arginine-metabolizing enzymes are present in some human leukocytes, and there is evidence that they are also present in macrophages from other vertebrates, including chickens, rabbits, cows, and primates (–). However, comparisons of tissue macrophages of different species are lacking, which limits our understanding (). Many studies in humans have principally focused on blood monocytes, leading some researchers to question the suitability of rodents as model of macrophage activation, as there is not always a direct correlation with human cells. Was Robert Koch correct when he said “Gentlemen, never forget that mice are not humans,” or can the differing results between species be explained, in part, by differences in the types of monocyte or macrophage studied? Our purpose here is to examine this question.
Arginine Metabolism in Mammalian Cells
Many mammalian cells, including neutrophils, granulocytes, erythrocytes, hepatocytes, cardiac myocytes, dendritic cells, myeloid-derived suppressor cells, foam cells, natural killer cells, endothelial cells, and smooth muscle cells, have arginase (, –) or NOS activity (, –), albeit to different degrees. Macrophages are the primary circulating cells that can express either of these enzymes, depending on the inflammatory circumstance. Experiments that detect NO, ornithine, or urea production (via NOS2 or arginase) have most often been performed on rodent macrophages. Macrophages from some mouse strains (e.g., the M1-biased C57BL/6 strain) can be stimulated by lipopolysaccharide (LPS) to produce considerable quantities of NO. Macrophages from others strains (e.g., M2-skewed BALB/c mice) produce much less NO () and produce more ornithine instead. Some researchers did not detect any NO production in macrophages from humans, pigs, and rabbits (, , , –), but others (including ourselves) have observed NOS or arginase activity in macrophages from rabbits, humans, and other primates (, , , , , –).
Why is there Controversy?
One main difference between the studies from laboratories is that some use monocyte-derived macrophages (MDM), while others study tissue macrophages directly. A number of groups have detected NOS or arginase activity in human monocytes or macrophages (, –); but others have not. Why is this so? Part of the explanation lies in the fact that in vitro-derived macrophages can generate different responses from macrophages obtained in vivo as discussed below (and shown in Table 1). Another explanation is that many groups use the identification of enzyme protein rather than detection of enzyme activity as evidence of enzyme expression. Failure to detect the presence of a protein is not definitive evidence for absence of expression (especially when considering potentially different detection thresholds of antibodies or the high Vmax of arginase, i.e., very little enzyme is required for ornithine production).
Table 1
| Cell origin | Cell | Treatment | NOS test | ARG test | Result | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blood monocytes | Monocyte, mono-mac | 0, 2, 3, or 5d culture | RNA, citrulline, FC | RNA, urea | NOS, ARG1 and ARG2 levels vary between monocyte subpopulations | () |
| Blood monocytes | Monocyte, mono-mac | 0, 3, or 7d culture or 7d M-CSF, 0.75d IFNγ/LPS, or IL4 | Gene array | No difference (≤2-fold cut-off, therefore genes with smaller differences discounted) | () | |
| Blood monocytes (filaria-infected) | Monocyte | 1d culture | RNA | RNA | ↑ARG1, ↓NOS2 | () |
| Blood monocytes (burns victims) | Monocyte | 2d culture | Urea | ↑ARG1 | () | |
| Blood monocytes | Monocyte | 2d microfilaria, M-CSF, IL4, or IFNγ/LPS | RNA | RNA | Most donors had low but detectable NOS2 and ARG1 RNA expression which did not change with any treatment. | () |
| Blood monocytes | Mono-mac | 3d IFNγ and/or IL4 (No M-CSF) | RNA | ↓ARG1, but detectable in all conditions | () | |
| Monocyte/macrophage cell line (U937) | Mono-mac | ?d LPS and/or IFNγ | Transcription run-on assay | No induction of NOS2 gene transcription (for that particular region of the promoter region) | () | |
| Monocyte/macrophage cell line (U937) | Mono-mac | 1d selenomethionine and 1d LPS and/or IFNγ | Griess, RNA Western | Selenomethionine ↓LPS-induced NOS2 expression (RNA and protein) and nitrite production | () | |
| Blood monocytes, peritoneal macrophages | Mono-mac, macrophage | ?d culture, 2d LPS, IFNγ, or TNFα/GM-CSF | Griess, amino acid HPLC | No nitrite, ornithine, citrulline production, no arginine consumption | () | |
| Blood monocytes, peritoneal macrophages | Monocyte, mono-mac | 0d or 3d LPS or cytokine | RNA, IB, ICC, biopterin, citrulline, Griess | NOS2 mRNA and protein present in monocytes, ↑peritoneal macrophages (↑with LPS). Both cell types produce neopterin, nitrite/nitrate and citrulline (low levels) | () | |
| Blood monocytes (MS sufferers) | Macrophage | 6d GM-CSF 0.75d IL4, IFNγ, LPS, or TNFα | RNA, Griess | RNA, WB, urea | ARG1 and NOS2 mRNA and nitrite production in MS and controls, ↑with M1 or M2 cytokine challenge. ARG1 protein and urea production present in controls, ↑in MS | () |
| Blood monocytes | Macrophage | 8d M-CSF, 5d oxLDL | RNA | No change in ARG1 levels | () | |
| Blood monocytes | Macrophage | 10d M-CSF, 1d IL4, or IL10 | Urea, WB arginine | No ARG1 after induction by IL4 or IL10 | () | |
| Blood monocytes | Macrophage | 14d IFNγ/LPS | Griess | No nitrite production | () | |
| Alveolar macrophages (volunteers) | Macrophage | IFNγ | Griess, citrulline | No NO production, no effect of NOS inhibitor | () | |
| Alveolar macrophages | Macrophage | ?d (short), 0.8d IL4, or forskolin (i.e., ↑cAMP) | Urea | Untreated macrophages have ARG activity similar to unstimulated RAW cells. ↑ARG with IL4/forskolin but not IL4 alone | () | |
| Alveolar macrophages (cancer suffers, volunteers) | Macrophage | 0.75d IFNγ/LPS or IL-10 | RNA, WB | RNA | ↑ARG with IL10 stimulated cells, ↑NOS2 with IFNγ/LPS stimulated cells | () |
| Alveolar macrophages (TB patients, volunteers) | Macrophage | None | IHC, WB, RNA, diaphorase | 45–49% of cells from TB patients have NOS2. Smoking controls had some NOS2-positive macrophages, non-smoking controls have few NOS2-positive cells | () | |
| Alveolar macrophages (TB patients) | Macrophage | None | IHC | Macrophages in TB granulomas stain for NOS1, NOS2 and nitrotyrosine (i.e., active) | () | |
| Alveolar macrophages (TB patients) | Macrophage | None | IHC | IHC | ARG1 in macrophages in TB granulomas, few have Arg2. Some macrophages on outer margins have both NOS2 and ARG1, some near center have NOS2, NOS3 and ARG1 | () |
| Atherosclerotic plaque macrophages | Macrophage | None | ISH, IHC | NOS2 in macrophages and smooth muscle cells, co-localized with oxidized lipoproteins and peroxynitrite (i.e., NOS is active) | () | |
| Atherosclerotic plaque macrophages | Macrophage | None | IHC, WB | Fatty streaks: no NOS2. Advanced plaques: NOS2 present in macrophages near necrotic core, associated with ceroid accumulation and nitrotyrosine (i.e., active) | () | |
| Atherosclerotic plaque foamy macrophages | Macrophage | None | IHC | ↑ARG1 in macrophages in superficial layers, ↓ARG1 in macrophages surrounding lipid core | () | |
| Atherosclerotic plaque | Macrophage | None | IHC, ISH | NOS2 and nitrotyrosine localized to smooth muscle cells, macrophages and foam cells (i.e., active) | () | |
| Oral macrophages | Macrophage | None | IHC, nitrate | NOS2 present in macrophages from gingivitis samples | () | |
| Placental macrophages | Macrophage | None | FC | Some M2 macrophages have ARG1 | () | |
| Skin macrophages (wound) | Macrophage | None | IHC, HPLC | IHC, WB, ELISA, HPLC | NOS2 present in macrophages, some have ARG2, but none have ARG1. Controls: no ARG2 | () |
| Tumor-associated macrophages | Macrophage | None | IHC | NOS2 present in some macrophages (bladder) | () |
The presence of arginine-metabolizing enzymes in human monocytes and macrophages varies with cell source, treatment and health status/stress level of the individual.
While changes in RNA expression of arginine-metabolizing enzymes have been used to identify macrophage activation states, protein changes [such as western blotting (WB) or immunohistochemistry (IHC)] are also useful. Nitric oxide synthase (NOS) activity can be assessed directly [e.g., production of citrulline or NO (e.g., Griess assay)] or by the presence of markers of NO production (such as peroxynitrite, nitrotyrosine or ceroid, a complex of oxidized lipids and proteins). Arginase (ARG) activity can be measured as urea or ornithine production (e.g., urea assays, amino acid HPLC).
d, number of days; ?d, unspecified number of days; FC, flow cytometry; M-CSF, macrophage colony-stimulating factor; IFNγ, interferon-γ; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; IL, interleukin; TNFα, tumor necrosis factor-α; GM-CSF, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor; IB, immunoblot; ICC, immunocytochemistry; MS, multiple sclerosis; oxLDL, oxidized low density lipoprotein; TB, tuberculosis; ISH, in situ hybridization; Griess, Griess assay for nitrite/nitrate production.
It should be noted that NO production below the detection levels of this relatively insensitive assay may still have functional effects ().
Macrophages produced in vitro
Macrophages have been produced in vitro in a number of ways. Cells from bone marrow have been isolated and “differentiated” in culture medium containing high levels of cytokines (such as colony stimulating factors, CSFs) to produce bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDM) (, , –). Macrophages have also been produced by isolating and culturing monocytes from blood, to produce MDM (, , , , , , ). Production of these in vitro-derived macrophages is cheap, simple, and reproducible, but they may not be a full representative of tissue macrophages, as the preparation and culture procedures may not be sufficient to induce cell activation (). The differences between tissue macrophages and in vitro-derived macrophages are at least partly dependent on cell source, time in culture, and the degree of manipulation in culture. Each research group will use different types and sources of culture media and sera, which vary greatly in the concentrations of factors that influence NOS2 or arginase expression, such as transforming growth factor β (TGFβ) (, , ). Another confounding issue is that circulating monocytes and tissue macrophages arise from different stem cell populations (), although some macrophages found at sites of infection or inflammation may derive from infiltrating monocytes (). Together, these factors may account for many of the differences observed in NO and urea production in these macrophages (, ).
Monocyte-derived macrophages or BMDM from different strains of mice can differ in their response to interferon-γ (IFNγ), LPS, and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNFα) (, ), and differences in the rodent background can result in differences in macrophage gene expression (, , ). Human in vitro-derived macrophages also show variability in their responses to LPS (, , ). It may be that the same stimulus is able to generate quite different responses in genetically diverse individuals, as it does between mouse strains (, , ). In general, human macrophages are not as responsive to LPS as mouse macrophages, possibly because of the lower environmental exposure of humans to LPS. It is also possible that human monocytes may be more effectively stimulated to become M1-activated macrophages by cytokines other than IFNγ and LPS/TNFα (e.g., IFNα) (, , ). Human macrophages take longer time to respond to the stimulatory factors in vitro than mouse macrophages, and some experiments using human MDM may have ended before a response was detected (). There are other indications that the timing and length of the exposure of the cells to varying cytokines in vitro are important. For example, when M1-polarizing cytokines were removed from the culture medium, NOS2 levels in mouse BMDM were reduced and NO production (measured as nitrite) ceased (). In addition, whichever arginase or NOS enzyme was induced earliest, the alternative enzyme decreased in expression and activity, unless arginine was present in excess (, , ). Macrophages require the local environment to continuously give appropriate activation cues. Changes in environmental cues can stimulate macrophage populations in vitro to express varying percentages of M1 or M2 dominant activity (). When activation cues are reduced or removed, macrophages may become deactivated (e.g., M2c) or indeterminate (e.g., have features of M1 and M2).
Macrophages obtained in vivo
Macrophages can be identified in whole tissues and organs or isolated in large numbers from in vivo sources such as the peritoneum or granulomas, and either examined immediately or used ex vivo. Macrophages obtained in vivo or made from monocytes can respond differently to the same stimulus (, ). In one study, monocytes and tissue macrophages were obtained from patients with an inflammatory disease (either rheumatoid or psoriatic arthritis). Compared with tissue macrophages, the MDM had a blunted response to the M2 cytokines interleukin-4 (IL-4) and IL-13, at least partly due to a reduction in some of the receptor elements for these cytokines (). These results suggest that the response of the macrophages to M2 cytokines may be source specific, but it is possible that these cytokines alone were not sufficient to fully stimulate the MDM (). Several lines of evidence suggest that macrophages in vivo express functional NOS2. Blood monocytes and peritoneal macrophages obtained from women during laparoscopic procedures contained NOS2 mRNA and protein. The macrophages had higher NOS levels than the monocytes, and this could be increased by treatment with LPS. The monocytes and macrophages also produced neopterin, nitrite/nitrate, and citrulline (suggesting that the enzyme was active). Although the production of NO from these macrophages was low, it would probably have been sufficient to cause functional changes ().
Macrophages can also be obtained from alveolar aspirates, skin, and the placenta (, , , , , , ). For example, sponges placed subcutaneously into mice, rats, or rabbits attract large numbers of macrophages. The sponges can be removed from the animal and the macrophages were isolated and purified (, , ). It is a little more difficult to obtain and purify macrophages from other tissues, such as atherosclerotic vessels (), but intact biopsy, surgical, or cadaveric specimens can also be investigated. It should be noted that resident macrophages from different tissues observed at different times (and different health states) may not necessarily have identical properties (, ).
In order to perform their full range of functions, macrophage populations exhibit “plasticity” of phenotype (, ), regardless of whether they are found in vivo or derived in vitro. As macrophages adapt or change their functions, they can simultaneously express markers of M1 and M2 activation, including NOS2 and arginase-1 (, , ). For example, tissue macrophages (and MDM) from Mycobacterium tuberculosis-infected cynomolgus macaques have been observed to co-express functional NOS and arginase enzymes (). We suggest that macrophages display a spectrum of activation phenotypes, and it is the relative (and not absolute) proportion of M1 or M2 markers that we can use as a ‘handle’ to determine the type of activation state.
Effect of disease and trauma on macrophage activation
Blood monocytes from healthy volunteers do not usually need to produce NOS or arginase, so it is not surprising that many studies have not detected NOS or arginase in these cells (, , , , , , ). However, studies performed on tissue or cells from people undergoing stress, trauma [e.g., burns ()], pregnancy (), or disease {such as infection [e.g., tuberculosis (, , ) or filarial infection ()], atherosclerosis (, , , ), autoimmune diseases (, ) and cancer (, )} demonstrate that human macrophages (and sometimes monocytes) can produce active forms of the arginine-metabolizing enzymes (Table 1).
Trauma results in a pattern of gene expression in macrophages that is consistent with a wound-healing response, with an initial increase in NOS followed by decreased NOS production and activity, elevated IL-4, IL-10, and TGFβ levels, and increased arginase expression and activity, resulting in decreased plasma arginine levels (, , ).
Disease, however, causes different patterns of gene expression. For example, monocytes from multiple sclerosis sufferers not only have higher levels of arginase-1 and increased urea production, but also have increased NOS2 mRNA and nitrite production (particularly when stimulated by M1 cytokines or LPS) (). Macrophages from patients with inflammatory diseases, such as tuberculosis, malaria, or rheumatoid arthritis, have increased levels of NOS2 mRNA and active protein (, , , , ), which may contribute to elevated plasma NO levels (). Atherosclerosis is another inflammatory disease with a considerable macrophage contribution, with oxidized low-density lipoproteins taken up by macrophages during their transformation into foam cells. Plaque macrophages express NOS2 RNA and protein, as well as markers of NOS activity (including the presence of nitrotyrosine or ceroid) (, , , ). Plaque macrophages and foam cells express arginase-1 (), and macrophages laser-dissected from plaque have upregulated levels of arginase-2 and NOS2 (). Macrophages present in some neoplastic diseases also produce active NOS2 (, , ). Reducing the local levels of arginine has been proposed as a treatment for these diseases, by reducing inflammation-triggered immune dysfunction, tumor escape, fibrosis, and immunosuppression (). Possible pharmacological interventions include treatment with arginine degrading enzymes, NOS competitors and inhibitors, asymmetric dimethylarginine, NO-releasing aspirins, cyclooxygenase, and phosphodiesterase or arginase inhibitors (, ). These studies suggest that an inflammatory environment is necessary in order to observe NOS or arginase in human monocytes and macrophages. The in vitro experiments that do not demonstrate arginase or NOS expression may simply be lacking the additional cues needed for expression rather than demonstrating an inability to actually express these factors.
Conclusion
The modulation of macrophages to express NOS or arginase has clear benefits for treating disease in humans (and other species). To do this, one needs to either determine suitable signals to stimulate these pathways or obtain a sufficient number of human macrophages (e.g., by tissue culture) that function like tissue macrophages.
Because macrophages from different inbred strains of mice vary greatly in their macrophage NOS and arginase balance, one would predict similar variability to be found in humans as well. In addition, the source of the macrophages being studied has been found to be important. Several groups have reported that human monocytes from healthy volunteers that have been differentiated or manipulated in vitro using current protocols tend not to have detectable levels of arginase and NOS enzymes, whereas MDM from diseased or stressed individuals or tissue macrophages obtained from normal, diseased, or stressed individuals do express NOS and/or arginase. Together these observations suggest that the current system of differentiating macrophages from human peripheral monocytes in vitro needs further refinement before it can be considered to be an accurate model of human macrophage behavior in vivo (). In turn, we need to understand the differences and similarities between the different species and the cells being studied to develop experimental models that will answer some of the outstanding questions regarding macrophage M1/M2 or other activation states: What regulates macrophage activation in tissues? What mechanisms regulate macrophage plasticity and stability? How does plasticity of phenotype affect tissue macrophages? What are the full in vivo ramifications of the M1/M2 paradigm?
Further work is important to be sure that our observations of the human system in vitro are real, and not due to our cell source, measurements, or manipulations. We suggest that macrophages obtained from mice remain useful for investigating aspects of these questions in humans/human macrophages. So, although mice are not men (as Robert Koch observed), we agree with Rudolf Virchow that “Between animal and human medicine there is no dividing line – nor should there be. The object is different but the experience obtained constitutes the basis of all medicine” [Rudolph Virchow, 1821–1902].
Statements
Acknowledgments
Anita C. Thomas is supported by funding from the British Heart Foundation. Joshua T. Mattila is supported in part by NIH RO1A103785 and Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation grants to JoAnne Flynn (University of Pittsburgh).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
GallinaGDolcettiLSerafiniPDe SantoCMarigoIColomboMPet alTumors induce a subset of inflammatory monocytes with immunosuppressive activity on CD8+ T cells. J Clin Invest (2006) 116:2777–90.10.1172/JCI28828
2
LumengCNBodzinJLSaltielAR. Obesity induces a phenotypic switch in adipose tissue macrophage polarization. J Clin Invest (2007) 117:175–84.10.1172/JCI29881
3
MillsCD. M1 and M2 macrophages: oracles of health and disease. Crit Rev Immunol (2012) 32:463–88.10.1615/CritRevImmunol.v32.i6.10
4
WeinbergJB. Nitric oxide production and nitric oxide synthase type 2 expression by human mononuclear phagocytes: a review. Mol Med (1998) 4:557–91.
5
PerozichJHempelJMorrisJ. Roles of conserved residues in the arginase family. Biochim Biophys Acta (1998) 1382:23–37.
6
DzikJM. The ancestry and cumulative evolution of immune reactions. Acta Biochim Pol (2010) 57:443–66.
7
LuomaJSStralinPMarklundSLHiltunenTPSarkiojaTYla-HerttualaS. Expression of extracellular SOD and iNOS in macrophages and smooth muscle cells in human and rabbit atherosclerotic lesions: colocalization with epitopes characteristic of oxidized LDL and peroxynitrite-modified proteins. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol (1998) 18:157–67.10.1161/01.ATV.18.2.157
8
BogdanC. Nitric oxide and the immune response. Nat Immunol (2001) 2:907–16.10.1038/ni1001-907
9
DjerabaAMussetEvanRNQuereP. Resistance and susceptibility to Marek’s disease: nitric oxide synthase/arginase activity balance. Vet Microbiol (2002) 86:229–44.10.1016/S0378-1135(02)00010-X
10
ThomasACSala-NewbyGBIsmailYJohnsonJLPasterkampGNewbyAC. Genomics of foam cells and nonfoamy macrophages from rabbits identifies arginase-I as a differential regulator of nitric oxide production. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol (2007) 27:571–7.10.1161/01.ATV.0000256470.23842.94
11
ZelnickovaPMatiasovicJPavlovaBKudlackovaHKovaruFFaldynaM. Quantitative nitric oxide production by rat, bovine and porcine macrophages. Nitric Oxide (2008) 19:36–41.10.1016/j.niox.2008.04.001
12
MattilaJTOjoOOKepka-LenhartDMarinoSKimJHEumSYet alMicroenvironments in tuberculous granulomas are delineated by distinct populations of macrophage subsets and expression of nitric oxide synthase and arginase isoforms. J Immunol (2013) 191:773–84.10.4049/jimmunol.1300113
13
MurrayPJWynnTA. Obstacles and opportunities for understanding macrophage polarization. J Leukoc Biol (2011) 89:557–63.10.1189/jlb.0710409
14
MunderMMollinedoFCalafatJCanchadoJGil-LamaignereCFuentesJMet alArginase I is constitutively expressed in human granulocytes and participates in fungicidal activity. Blood (2005) 105:2549–56.10.1182/blood-2004-07-2521
15
MorrisSM. Arginine metabolism: boundaries of our knowledge. J Nutr (2007) 137:1602S–9S.
16
KropfPBaudDMarshallSEMunderMMosleyAFuentesJMet alArginase activity mediates reversible T cell hyporesponsiveness in human pregnancy. Eur J Immunol (2007) 37:935–45.10.1002/eji.200636542
17
ButteryLDSpringallDRChesterAHEvansTJStandfieldENParumsDVet alInducible nitric oxide synthase is present within human atherosclerotic lesions and promotes the formation and activity of peroxynitrite. Lab Invest (1996) 75:77–85.
18
BronteVZanovelloP. Regulation of immune responses by l-arginine metabolism. Nat Rev Immunol (2005) 5:641–54.10.1038/nri1668
19
LechnerMGMegielCRussellSMBinghamBArgerNWooTet alFunctional characterization of human Cd33+ and Cd11b+ myeloid-derived suppressor cell subsets induced from peripheral blood mononuclear cells co-cultured with a diverse set of human tumor cell lines. J Transl Med (2011) 9:90.10.1186/1479-5876-9-90
20
MillsCDKincaidKAltJMHeilmanMJHillAM. M-1/M-2 macrophages and the Th1/Th2 paradigm. J Immunol (2000) 164:6166–73.10.4049/jimmunol.164.12.6166
21
CameronMLGrangerDLWeinbergJBKozumboWJKorenHS. Human alveolar and peritoneal macrophages mediate fungistasis independently of l-arginine oxidation to nitrite or nitrate. Am Rev Respir Dis (1990) 142:1313–9.10.1164/ajrccm/142.6_Pt_1.1313
22
SchneemannMSchoedonGHoferSBlauNGuerreroLSchaffnerA. Nitric oxide synthase is not a constituent of the antimicrobial armature of human mononuclear phagocytes. J Infect Dis (1993) 167:1358–63.10.1093/infdis/167.6.1358
23
KapetanovicRFairbairnLBeraldiDSesterDPArchibaldALTuggleCKet alPig bone marrow-derived macrophages resemble human macrophages in their response to bacterial lipopolysaccharide. J Immunol (2012) 188:3382–94.10.4049/jimmunol.1102649
24
NicholsonSBonecini-AlmeidaMGLapa e SilvaJLNathanCXieQWMumfordRet alInducible nitric oxide synthase in pulmonary alveolar macrophages from patients with tuberculosis. J Exp Med (1996) 183:2293–302.10.1084/jem.183.5.2293
25
CromheekeKMKockxMMDe MeyerGRYBosmansJMBultHBeelaertsWJFet alInducible nitric oxide synthase colocalizes with signs of lipid oxidation/peroxidation in human atherosclerotic plaques. Cardiovasc Res (1999) 43:744–54.10.1016/S0008-6363(99)00148-0
26
ChoiHSRaiPRChuHWCoolCChanED. Analysis of nitric oxide synthase and nitrotyrosine expression in human pulmonary tuberculosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med (2002) 166:178–86.10.1164/rccm.2201023
27
RouzautASubiraMLde MiguelCDomingo-de-MiguelEGonzalezASantiagoEet alCo-expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase and arginases in different human monocyte subsets. Apoptosis regulated by endogenous NO. Biochim Biophys Acta (1999) 1451:319–33.10.1016/S0167-4889(99)00106-8
28
BabuSKumaraswamiVNutmanTB. Alternatively activated and immunoregulatory monocytes in human filarial infections. J Infect Dis (2009) 199:1827–37.10.1086/599090
29
KobayashiMJeschkeMGShigematsuKAsaiAYoshidaSHerndonDNet alM2b monocytes predominated in peripheral blood of severely burned patients. J Immunol (2010) 185:7174–9.10.4049/jimmunol.0903935
30
MartinezFOGordonSLocatiMMantovaniA. Transcriptional profiling of the human monocyte-to-macrophage differentiation and polarization: new molecules and patterns of gene expression. J Immunol (2006) 177:7303–11.10.4049/jimmunol.177.10.7303
31
SemnaniRTMahapatraLMooreVSanprasertVNutmanTB. Functional and phenotypic characteristics of alternative activation induced in human monocytes by interleukin-4 or the parasitic nematode Brugia malayi. Infect Immun (2011) 79:3957–65.10.1128/IAI.05191-11
32
RaesGBrysLDahalBKBrandtJGrootenJBrombacherFet alMacrophage galactose-type C-type lectins as novel markers for alternatively activated macrophages elicited by parasitic infections and allergic airway inflammation. J Leukoc Biol (2005) 77:321–7.10.1189/jlb.0304212
33
ZhangXLaubachVEAlleyEWEdwardsKAShermanPARussellSWet alTranscriptional basis for hyporesponsiveness of the human inducible nitric oxide synthase gene to lipopolysaccharide/interferon-gamma. J Leukoc Biol (1996) 59:575–85.
34
ShenYYangSShiZLinTZhuHBiFet alSeMet mediates anti-inflammation in LPS-induced U937 cells targeting NF-kB signaling pathway. Inflammation (2014).10.1007/s10753-014-9984-0
35
WeinbergJBMisukonisMAShamiPJMasonSNSaulsDLDittmanWAet alHuman mononuclear phagocyte inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS): analysis of iNOS mRNA, iNOS protein, biopterin, and nitric oxide production by blood monocytes and peritoneal macrophages. Blood (1995) 86:1184–95.
36
ChristophiGPPanosMHudsonCAChristophiRLGruberRCMersichATet alMacrophages of multiple sclerosis patients display deficient SHP-1 expression and enhanced inflammatory phenotype. Lab Invest (2009) 89:742–59.10.1038/labinvest.2009.32
37
PadgettELPruettSB. Evaluation of nitrite production by human monocyte-derived macrophages. Biochem Biophys Res Commun (1992) 186:775–81.10.1016/0006-291X(92)90813-Z
38
ErdelyAKepka-LenhartDClarkMZeidler-ErdelyPPoljakovicMCalhounWJet alInhibition of phosphodiesterase 4 amplifies cytokine-dependent induction of arginase in macrophages. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol (2006) 290:L534–9.10.1152/ajplung.00326.2005
39
LiuCYWangYMWangCLFengPHKoHWLiuYHet alPopulation alterations of l-arginase- and inducible nitric oxide synthase-expressed CD11b+/CD14(-)/CD15+/CD33+ myeloid-derived suppressor cells and CD8+ T lymphocytes in patients with advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol (2010) 136:35–45.10.1007/s00432-009-0634-0
40
OzerLElgunSOzdemirBPervaneBOzmericN. Arginine-nitric oxide-polyamine metabolism in periodontal disease. J Periodontol (2011) 82:320–8.10.1902/jop.2010.100199
41
DebatsIBWolfsTGGotohTCleutjensJPPeutz-KootstraCJvan der HulstRR. Role of arginine in superficial wound healing in man. Nitric Oxide (2009) 21:175–83.10.1016/j.niox.2009.07.006
42
SurianoFSantiniDPerroneGAmatoMVincenziBToniniGet alTumor associated macrophages polarization dictates the efficacy of BCG instillation in non-muscle invasive urothelial bladder cancer. J Exp Clin Cancer Res (2013) 32:87.10.1186/1756-9966-32-87
43
BogdanC. Response to ‘Species differences in macrophage NO production are important’. Nat Immunol (2002) 3:102.10.1038/ni0202-102a
44
GalkinaEKadlASandersJVarugheseDSarembockIJLeyK. Lymphocyte recruitment into the aortic wall before and during development of atherosclerosis is partially l-selectin dependent. J Exp Med (2006) 203:1273–82.10.1084/jem.20052205
45
YeramianAMartinLSerratNArpaLSolerCBertranJet alArginine transport via cationic amino acid transporter 2 plays a critical regulatory role in classical or alternative activation of macrophages. J Immunol (2006) 176:5918–24.10.4049/jimmunol.176.10.5918
46
ShalhoubJFalck-HansenMADaviesAHMonacoC. Innate immunity and monocyte-macrophage activation in atherosclerosis. J Inflamm (2011) 8:9.10.1186/1476-9255-8-9
47
HartPHBonderCSBaloghJDickensheetsHLDonnellyRPFinlay-JonesJJ. Differential responses of human monocytes and macrophages to IL-4 and IL-13. J Leukoc Biol (1999) 66:575–8.
48
Geelhaar-KarschASchinnerlingKConradKFriebelJAllersKSchneiderTet alEvaluation of arginine metabolism for the analysis of M1/M2 macrophage activation in human clinical specimens. Inflamm Res (2013) 62:865–9.10.1007/s00011-013-0642-z
49
MillsCD. Macrophage arginine metabolism to ornithine/urea or nitric oxide/citrulline: a life or death issue. Crit Rev Immunol (2001) 21:399–425.10.1615/CritRevImmunol.v21.i5.10
50
EpelmanSLavineKJRandolphGJ. Origin and functions of tissue macrophages. Immunity (2014) 41:21–35.10.1016/j.immuni.2014.06.013
51
HussellTBellTJ. Alveolar macrophages: plasticity in a tissue-specific context. Nat Rev Immunol (2014) 14:81–93.10.1038/nri3600
52
RavasiTWellsCAHumeDA. Systems biology of transcription control in macrophages. Bioessays (2007) 29:1215–26.10.1002/bies.20683
53
El GayarSThuring-NahlerHPfeilschifterJRollinghoffMBogdanC. Translational control of inducible nitric oxide synthase by IL-13 and arginine availability in inflammatory macrophages. J Immunol (2003) 171:4561–8.10.4049/jimmunol.171.9.4561
54
Khallou-LaschetJVarthamanAFornasaGCompainCGastonATClementMet alMacrophage plasticity in experimental atherosclerosis. PLoS One (2010) 5:e8852.10.1371/journal.pone.0008852
55
AlbinaJEMillsCDBarbulAThirkillCEHenryWLMastrofrancescoBet alArginine metabolism in wounds. Am J Physiol (1988) 254: E459–67.
56
DaleyJMBrancatoSKThomayAAReichnerJSAlbinaJE. The phenotype of murine wound macrophages. J Leukoc Biol (2010) 87:59–67.10.1189/jlb.0409236
57
JohnsonJLNewbyAC. Macrophage heterogeneity in atherosclerotic plaques. Curr Opin Lipidol (2009) 20(5):370–8.10.1097/MOL.0b013e3283309848
58
HumeDA. Plenary perspective: the complexity of constitutive and inducible gene expression in mononuclear phagocytes. J Leukoc Biol (2012) 92:433–44.10.1189/jlb.0312166
59
PoljakovicMPorterDWMillecchiaLKepka-LenhartDBeighleyCWolfarthMGet alCell- and isoform-specific increases in arginase expression in acute silica-induced pulmonary inflammation. J Toxicol Environ Health A (2007) 70:118–27.10.1080/15287390600755075
60
AroraSOlszewskiMATsangTMMcDonaldRAToewsGBHuffnagleGB. Effect of cytokine interplay on macrophage polarization during chronic pulmonary infection with Cryptococcus neoformans. Infect Immun (2011) 79:1915–26.10.1128/IAI.01270-10
61
MunderM. Arginase: an emerging key player in the mammalian immune system. Br J Pharmacol (2009) 158:638–51.10.1111/j.1476-5381.2009.00291.x
62
OchoaJBBernardACO’BrienWEGriffenMMMaleyMERockichAKet alArginase I expression and activity in human mononuclear cells after injury. Ann Surg (2001) 233:393–9.10.1097/00000658-200103000-00014
63
NathanC. Role of iNOS in human host defense. Science (2006) 312:1874–5.10.1126/science.312.5782.1874b
64
BoutlisCSTjitraEManiboeyHMisukonisMASaundersJRSupriantoSet alNitric oxide production and mononuclear cell nitric oxide synthase activity in malaria-tolerant papuan adults. Infect Immun (2003) 71:3682–9.10.1128/IAI.71.7.3682-3689.2003
65
TuomistoTTKorkeelaARutanenJViitaHBrasenJHRiekkinenMSet alGene expression in macrophage-rich inflammatory cell infiltrates in human atherosclerotic lesions as studied by laser microdissection and DNA array: overexpression of HMG-CoA reductase, colony stimulating factor receptors, CD11A/CD18 integrins, and interleukin receptors. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol (2003) 23:2235–40.10.1161/01.ATV.0000102551.91154.96
66
PantanoFBertiPGuidaFMPerroneGVincenziBAmatoMMet alThe role of macrophages polarization in predicting prognosis of radically resected gastric cancer patients. J Cell Mol Med (2013) 17:1415–21.10.1111/jcmm.12109
Summary
Keywords
arginase, human macrophage, macrophage polarization, nitric oxide synthase, macrophage activation
Citation
Thomas AC and Mattila JT (2014) “Of Mice and Men”: Arginine Metabolism in Macrophages. Front. Immunol. 5:479. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00479
Received
01 August 2014
Accepted
19 September 2014
Published
07 October 2014
Volume
5 - 2014
Edited by
Charles Dudley Mills, BioMedical Consultants, USA
Reviewed by
Charles Dudley Mills, BioMedical Consultants, USA; Sidney Morris, University of Pittsburgh, USA
Copyright
© 2014 Thomas and Mattila.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: a.thomas@bristol.ac.uk
This article was submitted to Inflammation, a section of the journal Frontiers in Immunology.
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.