Abstract
The incidence of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), including Crohn’s disease (CD), is increasing worldwide, especially in young children and adolescents. Although hospitalized patients are usually provided with enteral or parenteral support, continuing care typically requires a trial-and-error approach to suppressing symptoms and maintaining disease remission. Current nutritional advice does not differ from general population guidelines. International collaborative studies have revealed 163 distinct genetic loci affecting susceptibility to IBD, in some of which host–microbe interactions can be seen to play an important role. The nature of these loci enables a rationale for predicting nutritional requirements that may not be evident through standard therapeutic approaches. Certain recognized nutrients, such as vitamin D and long-chain omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids, may be required at higher than anticipated levels. Various phytochemicals, not usually considered in the same class as classic nutrients, could play an important role. Prebiotics and probiotics may also be beneficial. Genomic approaches enable proof of principle of nutrient optimization rather than waiting for disease symptoms to appear and/or progress. We suggest a paradigm shift in diagnostic tools and nutritional therapy for CD, involving a systems biology approach for implementation.
Introduction
Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) cover a spectrum of gastrointestinal disorders, including both Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), differentiated by their location and behavior. While these diseases were seen as rare in the early twentieth century, they have become increasingly common, causing gut inflammation, ulceration, and other symptoms, in up to 1 in 250 people worldwide. For example, they had not been previously described among Bedouin Arabs in Southern Israel, but numbers are increasing now, almost certainly because of their increasingly urbanized lifestyle (). A recent commentary described IBD in Asia as the “emergence of a Western disease” (). While observed previously in Australasia, these diseases are becoming more common in young children and adolescents ().
There are a number of accepted treatments for CD, aimed not only to reduce the inflammation but also to improve the long-term prognosis (). The most desirable end point, achieved in only a relatively low proportion of cases at present, is long-term remission. One of the two approaches is used for CD treatment. “Step-up” starts with milder drugs first, while “top-down” gives people stronger drugs earlier in the treatment process. Anti-inflammatory drugs are often the first step in the treatment. These include oral 5-aminosalicylates, such as sulfasalazine and mesalamine, or corticosteroids. However, all of these lead to undesirable side effects. Immune system suppressors also reduce inflammation by targeting the immune system. These drugs include azathioprine (Imuran), mercaptopurine (Purinethol), infliximab (Remicade), adalimumab (Humira), and certolizumab pegol (Cimzia). The latter three drugs are inhibitors of the immune system protein tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α). It is important to realize, however, that the inflammatory response is a necessary part of response to an infection or injury, and long-term suppression of this may be disadvantageous.
Not only is CD itself debilitating, it also carries with it an increased risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) (). The nature of this cancer is fundamentally different from the classic disease, which arises from an adenomatous polyp (). The type of CRC that develops from either form of IBD is almost inevitably lethal. However, like sporadic CRC, it arises through genomic instability.
Genomic instability refers to the accumulation of mutations during the life cycle of cells (–). These mutations can involve changes at the level of nucleotide base pairs, chromosome rearrangements, or aneuploidy. Genomic instability can initiate cancer, augment cancer progression, and influence the overall prognosis of the affected patient. It arises from many different pathways, including telomere damage, centrosome amplification, epigenetic modifications, and DNA damage from endogenous and exogenous sources. Protection against genomic instability, or at least reduction of the probability, is an important function of certain nutrients and phytochemicals ().
Although nutrition is an important consideration in hospitalized patients, non-hospitalized patients are not currently being given nutritional guidelines outside those for the general population. We explore the possibility that thinking outside the current square in terms of nutrition might have significant beneficial effects beyond protection from malnutrition. That is, we suggest that nutrition could move from being an adjunct to therapy, to the point where it becomes primary therapy in its own right, integrated with currently accepted approaches (). There is reason to suggest that this could have significant benefits in terms of delaying IBD progression and reducing the possibility of CRC formation. Such information would ideally be tailored according to individual patient genetics, and validated using systems biology approaches, as detailed in the following sections.
Diet in Non-Hospitalized CD Patients
Either prior to hospitalization or following discharge from hospital, dietary selection is determined by something of a random process (). While the diet may be based on previous recollections of foods which affected symptoms, either in a positive or negative sense, it is often guided by advice from others with the disease. It has been clear for some time that certain foods may have adverse effects in most subjects, exacerbating disease symptoms by increasing inflammation and/or producing flatulence. In some groups, there has been endorsement of a “low FODMAP” diet, as this appears to reduce some of the symptoms in CD and other functional gastrointestinal disorders, especially irritable bowel syndrome (, ). FODMAP refers to the combination of saccharides and polyols and is an acronym of “Fermentable Oligo-, Di-, mono and polyols.” Against the recommendation for a low-FODMAP diet, there is a concern that such a structured dietary regime will have adverse effects in reducing dietary diversity. Of particular concern is the recognition that this same group of excluded nutrients plays a major role in modulating the composition of the gut microbiome ().
It has been recognized that there is a considerable danger of malnutrition exacerbating the already difficult symptoms of CD. Attention has been drawn to the possible need for higher than normal levels of vitamins such as vitamin D or lipids such as long-chain omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (n-3 PUFAs) (, ). What has not always been recognized is the role of dietary components that are not currently included in essential lists. For example, prebiotics and probiotics may be important in regulating the gut microbiota, and their importance may be missed in some assessments (–). Phytochemicals are sometimes called “non-nutrients.” Although these are not included in lists of essential nutrients, many of them play key roles in maintaining genomic stability and in modulating the composition of the gut microbiome (, , ). These could be key factors in helping to prevent the development of CRC in IBD.
Irrespective of nutrient composition, it has repeatedly been observed that foods considered to be beneficial for some individuals may actually cause adverse effects in others (, ). Individuals with the diseases differ in genetic, epigenetic, and phenotypic characteristics, so it is not surprising that a single approach is unlikely to be beneficial to all. However, studies showing the importance of genotype in the phenotypic characteristics of the diseases encourage the possibility of tailoring diets based on genetic and genomic information ().
Genetic Basis of CD
Crohn’s disease was one of the subjects of early reports on genome-wide association studies (GWAS). At that time, it appeared that there could be up to eight loci affecting disease susceptibility (). Since that time, large international groupings have performed a meta-analysis of CD and UC GWAS scans, as part of activity of the International IBD Genetics Consortium (IIBDGC) (). This was followed by extensive validation of significant findings, from data on a combined total of more than 75,000 cases and controls. These efforts initially revealed 163 distinct genetic loci affecting susceptibility to IBD overall (), but this number has more recently been expanded to 201 (). A number of these genes are involved in primary immune deficiencies, characterized by a dysfunctional immune system and increased susceptibility to serious infections. In particular, there is a considerable overlap between IBD loci and the immune-mediated disorders, ankylosing spondylitis and psoriasis (). This study found considerable overlap between susceptibility loci for IBD and mycobacterial infection, which relationships were emphasized by further analyses using coexpression network analysis. Many of the identified loci contain genes involved in microbial handling, and host–microbe interactions clearly play an important role in disease susceptibility ().
In further analyses of these datasets, the IIBDGC detailed fine-mapping project, clarified the nature of these genes and their interactions, and suggested that phenotypically there should be three rather than just two main classes of IBD and that CD should be categorized into two distinct classes depending upon its location (). Each of these classes of disease has characteristic genetic and phenotypic characteristics. The detailed nature of the genes and networks involved in disease susceptibility enables a rationale for predicting nutritional requirements that may not be evident through standard therapeutic approaches.
Possible Deviations from Conventional Nutrient Requirements in CD
There is a considerable scientific input into the setting of recommended daily nutrient intakes. While these may be good for the general population, they may often not reflect the actual requirements for CD patients. Figure 1 illustrates the identification of specific dietary components or items that may be important for different groups of CD patients, according to their genotype and the nature of the gut microbiome. Genetic testing can indicate the primary single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of importance at an individual level. If, for example, some of the interleukin (IL) genes are affected, these are primarily involved in inflammation (, ), although they may have a downstream effect on the microbiota. Thus, supplementation with long-chain n-3 PUFA or fish oils may be a nutritional approach to prioritize (–). Similarly, identification of NOD2 or ATG16L1 gene variants indicate that ability to respond appropriately to colonic bacteria is compromised (, ), and prebiotics and/or probiotics may provide an important starting point (, –). For all these individuals, especially those carrying a number of variant SNPs, it becomes important to protect against genomic instability since this will reflect a propensity for cancer development. In this respect, certain nutrients, especially vitamin D and phytochemicals, may play an important role ().
Figure 1
While it is desirable to have studies in CD patients, in practice much of this work comes from mouse models, developed to reflect our understanding of the genetics of CD (
The IL-10 gene-deficient (IL-10−/−) mouse model lacks a functional version of the anti-inflammatory cytokine, IL-10. IL-10−/− mice, inoculated with normal intestinal bacteria, have been used to investigate the role of various dietary components in intestinal inflammation, including mechanistic studies that consider transcriptomic, metabolomic, and proteomic effects (
Micronutrients
Fenech has reviewed the role of various micronutrients in slowing the progress of genomic instability, a key component in the progression of digestive diseases and the initiation of cancer (
We have more generally reviewed vitamin and mineral requirements to maintain genomic stability, especially in the context of the micronutrient genomics project (
Vitamin D is an important vitamin that appears to be required at higher than anticipated levels in CD patients (
Dietary lipids
Many naturally occurring agents directly bind with and activate peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPAR-γ or PPAR gamma), a type II nuclear receptor that in humans is encoded by the PPAR-γ gene. Agents binding this include various PUFAs including arachidonic acid and arachidonic acid metabolites. PPAR-g regulates fatty acid storage and glucose metabolism. The genes activated by PPAR-g stimulate lipid uptake by adipocytes and play an important role in regulating inflammation and cancer cell growth (
Peyrin-Biroulet and coworkers (
There have been variable results across various studies in relation to the association of common PPAR-g variants (C161T and Pro12Ala) with IBD. While Hume and coworkers reported no association in an Australian cohort (
Conjugated linoleic acid has been shown to modulate immune responses in patients with mild to moderately active CD (
The effects of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (n-3 PUFAs) are also modified by genotype, especially the nitric oxide synthase (NOS3) gene (
Phytochemicals
Polyphenols are secondary metabolites of higher plants and one of the largest groups of natural products. Although not usually considered in the same class as essential nutrients, various polyphenols could play an important role in CD susceptibility and progression. A range of polyphenols have been shown to modulate inflammation, especially in genetically deficient mouse models. For example, a green tea extract enriched in polyphenols was able to modulate colonic inflammation in mice lacking the multidrug resistance gene (Mdr1a−/−). Mice were fed control or green tea-enriched diets for 21–24 weeks of age, after which a colonic histological injury score was obtained, colonic gene expression analyzed using microarrays, and colon protein expression also measured (
Cruciferous vegetables, such as cabbage and broccoli, contain two types of sulfur-containing phytochemicals – glucosinolates and S-methyl cysteine sulfoxide. While these chemicals have a range of effects generally considered to be beneficial in the population at large, this group of food plants also polarizes individuals with CD. Laing and coworkers associated SNPs and the beneficial or adverse effects of the 10 most commonly eaten foods in this group (
The main polyphenol in green tea is (−)-epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG). Unno and coworkers showed this compound at levels of 0.6% to have strong effects on gut microbiota and biomarkers of colonic fermentation in rats (
Ellagic acid and ellagitannins are a class of hydrolyzable tannins found in some fruits and nuts. At least in in vitro studies, there is good evidence that these may have the potential to reduce inflammation in genetically modified cells (
Resveratrol is another polyphenol that has been shown to protect against genomic instability. It acts as an antioxidant protecting against free radical-induced DNA damage and is likely to play a protective role in gut inflammation and progression to CRC (
Probiotics and prebiotics
The diversity of microbiota appears as a key characteristic that may predict response to therapy in CD (
Probiotics have been defined by FAO/WHO as “live microorganisms that confer a health benefit to the host when administered in adequate amounts.” Especially in combination with prebiotics (plant substrates that enable modulation of colonic microbiota), these may be especially beneficial to CD patients (
Additionally, an increasing number of plant polyphenols are being identified to have effects on colonic microbiota identification and regulation (
Methylation, miRNAs, and CD
Not only genetics per se but also certain epigenetic events are associated with susceptibility to CD, disease progression, and CRC development.
DNA methylation has been considered for its role in the development of CD. Whole-blood DNA methylation profiles were compared in treatment-naive children with CD and healthy controls, as measured using the Illumina 450 K platform (
microRNAs (miRNAs) are recognized as playing an essential role in the development and control of the innate and adaptive immune system. These are small non-coding RNA molecules that lead to post-translational gene silencing and control gene expression in diverse biological processes, including inflammation. miRNA genes occur within intronic sequences of protein-coding genes, within intronic or exonic regions of non-coding RNAs, are intergenic (
Effects of Selected Nutrient Classes on Gene Expression in CD
There are no published reports of individual nutrients affecting gene expression in CD from human studies because the definitive studies would be unethical to perform. However, there are a number of studies in animal models or tissue culture systems, which provide useful information.
Micronutrients
The active binding sites of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (1,25D) are likely to regulate gene expression at the cellular level (
Human studies on vitamin D3 supplementation have enabled dissection of high from low responders in a pre-diabetic study population (
Long-chain omega-3 PUFA
These compounds have sometimes been described as master regulators of gene expression (
Knoch and coworkers compared the effects of EPA supplementation with that of oleic acid (OA) as control in the IL-10−/− mouse model (
Phytochemicals
Cytochrome P450s (CYPs) play an essential role in the metabolism of endogenous and exogenous molecules (
An extract of green tea, enriched in polyphenols (GrTP), was tested for effects on colonic inflammation in the MDRa−/− mouse model utilizing a transcriptomics approach (
Curcumin has been studied for effects on gene expression, using the N2A cell line (
Dietary curcumin and rutin were compared for effects on colonic inflammation and gene expression in the MDR1−/− mouse model (
Probiotics and prebiotics
Plaza-Diaz and coworkers found evidence that a range of probiotics modulate the expression of immunity and inflammatory genes in the gut, which appear especially relevant to CD. They performed a systematic review to conclude that strains of Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus, Escherichia coli, Propionibacterium, Bacillus, and Saccharomyces influence the gene expression of mucins, Toll-like receptors, caspases, NF-κB, and ILs, leading to an anti-inflammatory response in cultured enterocytes. Similar results were found in animal models ranging from fish to mice, rats, and piglets (
Prebiotics can also modulate host gene expression, with potentially beneficial flow-on effects relevant to CD (
Human Studies on the Benefits of This Combination of Nutrients on Gene Expression
Marlow and coworkers reported on gene expression effects of a specific diet containing examples of the nutrient classes under discussion (
Systems Biology Approaches to Validate the Efficacy of Dietary Approaches to Disease Control
In previous sections, we have identified a number of nutrients that are especially important for CD development and progression. Other nutrients will undoubtedly play an additive role. Systems biology links the interactions among genes, gene products, and environmental factors. As Polytarchou et al. have suggested, there is reason to suggest that this is ready for prime time in CD research (
Figure 2

Flowchart showing how genetic and genomic technologies may inform optimal nutritional modulation of CD. Genetic characterization of human DNA and the nature of the associated gut microbiome enable selection of an individualized diet for CD patients. While long-chain omega-3 PUFA containing fish or dietary supplements may be appropriate for most individuals, the exact nature of the most desirable fruits, vegetables, and supplements will vary. Although we are now in a position to make informed guesses, the proof of efficacy of the dietary choice would and probably should be informed by genomic approaches. In particular, there is reason to believe that the inflammation associated with CD will itself consume the various nutrients at higher than average levels. These techniques are now sufficiently sensitive to allow testing the effect of the selected dietary strategy following short-term intervention studies. Blood, urine, and feces samples would be required, before and after the study period. Changes in gene expression as monitored by transcriptomic profiles from peripheral blood mononuclear cells show which CD-related genes have modulated activity (
Fiocchi has identified four components of IBD pathogenesis as environment, genetics, gut microbiota, and mucosal immune response, which can be defined by the terms “expososome,” “genome,” “microbiome,” and “immunome” (94). None of these act independently, but interact (the “interactome”), resulting in the emergence of IBD. Polytarchou and coworkers (
Metabolomic approaches may provide important tools for understanding the differences between individuals in response to dietary components. For example, Lin and coworkers used a mouse model to investigate the effects of feeding kiwifruit-derived extracts from two different species (96). Not only did they find differences in anti-inflammatory activity between the green (Actinidia deliciosa) and gold-fleshed (Actinidia chinensis) kiwifruit extracts, but the efficacy of these extracts was modulated by the variant IL-10 genotype. This same mouse model and experimental approach revealed gradual changes in the metabolome as disease developed, particularly decreased levels of very low-density lipoprotein and increased low-density and very low-density lipoproteins and various PUFAs (97). The metabolome also interrelates with the microbiome, suggesting the possibility of utilizing targeted metabolomics for monitoring the consequences of therapeutically manipulating the microbial community as adjunct therapy in CD (98).
Much of the proof of concept of beneficial effects of certain diets in CD patients has been based on animal or tissue culture studies, rather than humans, since there are obvious ethical constraints in working with people. The classic biomarker of inflammation is considered to be CRP, while fecal calprotectin has gained considerable ground. However, as illustrated in the study by Marlow and coworkers, transcriptomics provides a more sensitive and more informative biomarker of beneficial effects of a selected diet in CD than CRP (
Research into gastrointestinal cancer has highlighted the importance of biomarkers, especially miRNAs, usually taken from colonic endoscopies. There is considerable interest in the discovery that miRNAs are present in serum in a cell-free state, highlighting the possibility of their potential use as non-invasive biomarkers (99). At this time, extracellular miRNAs have been identified in most biological fluids, including serum, urine, saliva, and breast milk. They are being considered as novel biomarkers, with considerable potential for predicting disease course and response to therapy.
Metabolites reflect the physiological phenotype, providing a molecular readout of the cell status (95). Such measures, taken from various biological fluids, can lead to the identification of “marker metabolites” that differentiate health from disease. In particular, metabonomics (spectroscopy-based metabolic profiling) of fecal extracts has been used to differentiate active from inactive CD. This method comes across as a powerful non-invasive diagnostic tool able to characterize changes in the metabolic profile associated with malabsorption and dysbiosis (100). Specific metabolites that distinguished groups with active from those with inactive disease included N-acetylated compounds and phenylalanine, low-density lipoproteins, and very low-density lipoproteins (101). More generally, metabolomics is being used in human studies to monitor compliance with required dietary changes and also efficacy of the change in slowing disease progression (102).
Proteomics is defined as the large-scale study of proteins, particularly their structures and functions (103). This technique has been used to validate conclusions from other technologies in a series of mouse studies by Barnett and coworkers (
The accurate diagnosis of CD has often lagged behind disease presentation. Proteomics is being increasingly used for early and accurate diagnosis of CD as well as for monitoring the course of the disease (
The toolbox for studying microbiota has become more powerful in recent years, with metagenomics reflecting the study of DNA, metatranscriptomics the total transcribed RNA, and metaproteomics the protein associated with the microbiota. Draft genome sequences have been derived for more than 1,000 human-associated microorganisms derived from the gastrointestinal tract of more than 100 humans (
Conclusion
There is a great deal written about desirable intakes for various classes of food and nutrients. However, the genetic background of CD would appear to make certain nutrients more important than for the general population, albeit differing somewhat according to the genetics of the individual patient. Such nutrients will be especially important during a flare-up of the disease, but will also be crucial in slowing disease progression. Proof of principle of these assertions has been largely dependent on tissue culture or animal models to date. However, improvements in sensitivity of various technologies, especially transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics, enable non-invasive sampling of humans from blood, urine, and/or stool samples, after relatively short-term human intervention studies. We suggest that there is justification for a paradigm shift in diagnostic tools and nutritional therapy for CD, involving a systems biology approach for implementation (106).
Statements
Conflict of interest
The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
Abu FrehaNSchwartzDElkrinawiJBen YakovGAbu TailakhMMunteanuDet alInflammatory bowel disease among Bedouin Arabs in southern Israel: urbanization and increasing prevalence rates. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol (2015) 27(3):230–4.10.1097/MEG.0000000000000263
2
NgSC. Emerging leadership lecture: inflammatory bowel disease in Asia: emergence of a “western” disease. J Gastroenterol Hepatol (2015) 30(3):440–5.10.1111/jgh.12859
3
DayASLembergDAGearryRB. Inflammatory bowel disease in Australasian children and adolescents. Gastroenterol Res Pract (2014) 2014:703890.10.1155/2014/703890
4
QuetglasEGArmuzziAWiggeSFiorinoGBarnscheidLFroelichMet alReview article: the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of drugs used in inflammatory bowel disease treatment. Eur J Clin Pharmacol (2015) 71(7):773–99.10.1007/s00228-015-1862-7
5
LeeHSParkSHYangSKYeBDKimJHKimSOet alThe risk of colorectal cancer in inflammatory bowel disease: a hospital-based cohort study from Korea. Scand J Gastroenterol (2015) 50(2):188–96.10.3109/00365521.2014.989538
6
ItzkowitzS. Colon carcinogenesis in inflammatory bowel disease: applying molecular genetics to clinical practice. J Clin Gastroenterol (2003) 36(5 Suppl):S70–4.10.1097/00004836-200305001-00012
7
FergusonLRChenHCollinsARConnellMDamiaGDasguptaSet alGenomic instability in human cancer: molecular insights and opportunities for therapeutic attack and prevention through diet and nutrition. Semin Cancer Biol (2015).10.1016/j.semcancer.2015.03.005
8
FenechMF. Nutriomes and personalised nutrition for DNA damage prevention, telomere integrity maintenance and cancer growth control. Cancer Treat Res (2014) 159:427–41.10.1007/978-3-642-38007-5_24
9
VasanSDeemARamakrishnanSArguesoJLMalkovaA. Cascades of genetic instability resulting from compromised break-induced replication. PLoS Genet (2014) 10(2):e1004119.10.1371/journal.pgen.1004119
10
FergusonLRDennyWA. COMMENTARY: pre-emptive nutrition: refining the targets of drugs targeted to colorectal cancer. Curr Cancer Drug Targets (2015) 15(3):173–5.10.2174/156800961503150505120604
11
TriggsCMMundayKHuRFraserAGGearryRBBarclayMLet alDietary factors in chronic inflammation: food tolerances and intolerances of a New Zealand Caucasian Crohn’s disease population. Mutat Res (2010) 690(1–2):123–38.10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2010.01.020
12
MuirJGGibsonPR. The low FODMAP diet for treatment of irritable bowel syndrome and other gastrointestinal disorders. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y) (2013) 9(7):450–2.
13
DonnellanCFYannLHLalS. Nutritional management of Crohn’s disease. Therap Adv Gastroenterol (2013) 6(3):231–42.10.1177/1756283X13477715
14
RastallRAGibsonGR. Recent developments in prebiotics to selectively impact beneficial microbes and promote intestinal health. Curr Opin Biotechnol (2015) 32:42–6.10.1016/j.copbio.2014.11.002
15
CarvalhoAYBishopKSHanDYEllettSJesuthasanALamWJet alThe role of Vitamin D level and related single nucleotide polymorphisms in Crohn’s disease. Nutrients (2013) 5(10):3898–909.10.3390/nu5103898
16
SerhanCNChiangNDalliJLevyBD. Lipid mediators in the resolution of inflammation. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol (2015) 7(2):a016311.10.1101/cshperspect.a016311
17
ZhouXRuanZHuangXZhouYLiuSYinY. The prebiotic lactosucrose modulates gut metabolites and microbiota in intestinal inflammatory rats. Food Sci Biotechnol (2014) 23(1):157–63.10.1007/s10068-014-0021-8
18
FergusonLR. Nutrigenetics, nutrigenomics and inflammatory bowel diseases. Expert Rev Clin Immunol (2013) 9(8):717–26.10.1586/1744666X.2013.824245
19
GentschewLFergusonLR. Role of nutrition and microbiota in susceptibility to inflammatory bowel diseases. Mol Nutr Food Res (2012) 56(4):524–35.10.1002/mnfr.201100630
20
BarnettMPCooneyJMDommelsYENonesKBrewsterDTParkZet alModulation of colonic inflammation in Mdr1a (-)/(-) mice by green tea polyphenols and their effects on the colon transcriptome and proteome. J Nutr Biochem (2013) 24(10):1678–90.10.1016/j.jnutbio.2013.02.007
21
FergusonLR. Role of plant polyphenols in genomic stability. Mutat Res (2001) 475(1–2):89–111.10.1016/S0027-5107(01)00073-2
22
LaingBHanDYFergusonLR. Candidate genes involved in beneficial or adverse responses to commonly eaten brassica vegetables in a New Zealand Crohn’s disease cohort. Nutrients (2013) 5(12):5046–64.10.3390/nu5125046
23
FergusonLRHuRLamWJMundayKTriggsCM. Tailoring foods to match people’s genes in New Zealand: opportunities for collaboration. J Nutrigenet Nutrigenomics (2010) 3(4–6):305–11.10.1159/000324369
24
LewisCMWhitwellSCForbesASandersonJMathewCGMarteauTM. Estimating risks of common complex diseases across genetic and environmental factors: the example of Crohn disease. J Med Genet (2007) 44(11):689–94.10.1136/jmg.2007.051672
25
FrankeAMcGovernDPBarrettJCWangKRadford-SmithGLAhmadTet alGenome-wide meta-analysis increases to 71 the number of confirmed Crohn’s disease susceptibility loci. Nat Genet (2010) 42(12):1118–25.10.1038/ng.717
26
JostinsLRipkeSWeersmaRKDuerrRHMcGovernDPHuiKYet alHost-microbe interactions have shaped the genetic architecture of inflammatory bowel disease. Nature (2012) 491(7422):119–24.10.1038/nature11582
27
GoyettePBoucherGMallonDEllinghausEJostinsLHuangHet alHigh-density mapping of the MHC identifies a shared role for HLA-DRB1 01:03 in inflammatory bowel diseases and heterozygous advantage in ulcerative colitis. Nat Genet (2015) 47(2):172–9.10.1038/ng.3176
28
WangJYuJCKangWMMaZQ. Superiority of a fish oil-enriched emulsion to medium-chain triacylglycerols/long-chain triacylglycerols in gastrointestinal surgery patients: a randomized clinical trial. Nutrition (2012) 28(6):623–9.10.1016/j.nut.2011.08.004
29
MastersonJCMcNameeENFillonSAHosfordLHarrisRFernandoSDet alEosinophil-mediated signalling attenuates inflammatory responses in experimental colitis. Gut (2014) 8:1326–47.10.1136/gutjnl-2014-306998
30
FengYBrownerPTeitelbaumDH. Effects on varying intravenous lipid emulsions on the small bowel epithelium in a mouse model of parenteral nutrition. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr (2013) 37(6):775–86.10.1177/0148607113491608
31
CalderPCAlbersRAntoineJMBlumSBourdet-SicardRFernsGAet alInflammatory disease processes and interactions with nutrition. Br J Nutr (2009) 101(Suppl 1):S1–45.10.1017/S0007114509377867
32
HondaKLLamon-FavaSMatthanNRWuDLichtensteinAH. EPA and DHA exposure alters the inflammatory response but not the surface expression of toll-like receptor 4 in macrophages. Lipids (2015) 50(2):121–9.10.1007/s11745-014-3971-y
33
MurthyALiYPengIReicheltMKatakamAKNoubadeRet alA Crohn’s disease variant in Atg16l1 enhances its degradation by caspase 3. Nature (2014) 506(7489):456–62.10.1038/nature13044
34
FolkardDLMarlowGMithenRFFergusonLR. Effect of sulforaphane on NOD2 via NF-kappaB: implications for Crohn’s disease. J Inflamm (2015) 12:6.10.1186/s12950-015-0051-x
35
CammarotaGIaniroGBibbòSGasbarriniA. Gut microbiota modulation: probiotics, antibiotics or fecal microbiota transplantation?Intern Emerg Med (2014) 9(4):365–73.10.1007/s11739-014-1069-4
36
ClarkMJRobienKSlavinJL. Effect of prebiotics on biomarkers of colorectal cancer in humans: a systematic review. Nutr Rev (2012) 70(8):436–43.10.1111/j.1753-4887.2012.00495.x
37
JohnsonLPWaltonGEPsichasAFrostGSGibsonGRBarracloughTG. Prebiotics modulate the effects of antibiotics on gut microbial diversity and functioning in vitro. Nutrients (2015) 7(6):4480–97.10.3390/nu7064480
38
UnnoTSakumaMMitsuhashiS. Effect of dietary supplementation of (-)-epigallocatechin gallate on gut microbiota and biomarkers of colonic fermentation in rats. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol (Tokyo) (2014) 60(3):213–9.10.3177/jnsv.60.213
39
KimHSQuonMJKimJA. New insights into the mechanisms of polyphenols beyond antioxidant properties; lessons from the green tea polyphenol, epigallocatechin 3-gallate. Redox Biol (2014) 2:187–95.10.1016/j.redox.2013.12.022
40
DoughertyKABertolasoCSchallJISmith-WhitleyKStallingsVA. Safety and efficacy of high-dose daily vitamin D3 supplementation in children and young adults with sickle cell disease. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol (2015) 37(5):e308–15.10.1097/MPH.0000000000000355
41
BarnettMPMcNabbWCCooksonALZhuSDavyMKnochBet alChanges in colon gene expression associated with increased colon inflammation in interleukin-10 gene-deficient mice inoculated with Enterococcus species. BMC Immunol (2010) 11:39.10.1186/1471-2172-11-39
42
Bassaganya-RieraJViladomiuMPedragosaMDe SimoneCCarboAShaykhutdinovRet alProbiotic bacteria produce conjugated linoleic acid locally in the gut that targets macrophage PPAR gamma to suppress colitis. PLoS One (2012) 7(2):e31238.10.1371/journal.pone.0031238
43
BaurPMartinFPGruberLBoscoNBrahmbhattVCollinoSet alMetabolic phenotyping of the Crohn’s disease-like IBD etiopathology in the TNF(DeltaARE/WT) mouse model. J Proteome Res (2011) 10(12):5523–35.10.1021/pr2007973
44
NonesKDommelsYEMartellSButtsCMcNabbWCParkZAet alThe effects of dietary curcumin and rutin on colonic inflammation and gene expression in multidrug resistance gene-deficient (mdr1a-/-) mice, a model of inflammatory bowel diseases. Br J Nutr (2009) 101(2):169–81.10.1017/S0007114508009847
45
LinHMBarnettMPRoyNCJoyceNIZhuSArmstrongKet alMetabolomic analysis identifies inflammatory and noninflammatory metabolic effects of genetic modification in a mouse model of Crohn’s disease. J Proteome Res (2010) 9(4):1965–75.10.1021/pr901130s
46
CooneyJMBarnettMPBrewsterDKnochBMcNabbWCLaingWAet alProteomic analysis of colon tissue from interleukin-10 gene-deficient mice fed polyunsaturated fatty acids with comparison to transcriptomic analysis. J Proteome Res (2012) 11(2):1065–77.10.1021/pr200807p
47
PanwalaCMJonesJCVineyJL. A novel model of inflammatory bowel disease: mice deficient for the multiple drug resistance gene, mdr1a, spontaneously develop colitis. J Immunol (1998) 161(10):5733–44.
48
FenechMF. Nutriomes and nutrient arrays – the key to personalised nutrition for DNA damage prevention and cancer growth control. Genome Integr (2010) 1(1):11.10.1186/2041-9414-1-11
49
FenechMF. Dietary reference values of individual micronutrients and nutriomes for genome damage prevention: current status and a road map to the future. Am J Clin Nutr (2010) 91(5):1438S–54S.10.3945/ajcn.2010.28674D
50
van OmmenBEl-SohemyAHeskethJKaputJFenechMEveloCTet alThe micronutrient genomics project: a community-driven knowledge base for micronutrient research. Genes Nutr (2010) 5(4):285–96.10.1007/s12263-010-0192-8
51
KarunasingheNHanDYZhuSDuanHKoYJYuJFet alEffects of supplementation with selenium, as selenized yeast, in a healthy male population from New Zealand. Nutr Cancer (2013) 65(3):355–66.10.1080/01635581.2013.760743
52
FergusonLRKarunasingheN. Nutrigenetics, nutrigenomics, and selenium. Front Genet (2011) 2:15.10.3389/fgene.2011.00015
53
AnanthakrishnanANCaganAGainerVSChengSCCaiTSzolovitsPet alHigher plasma vitamin D is associated with reduced risk of Clostridium difficile infection in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases. Aliment Pharmacol Ther (2014) 39(10):1136–42.10.1111/apt.12706
54
AnanthakrishnanANChengSCCaiTCaganAGainerVSSzolovitsPet alAssociation between reduced plasma 25-hydroxy vitamin D and increased risk of cancer in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol (2014) 12(5):821–7.10.1016/j.cgh.2013.10.011
55
MeekerSSeamonsAPaikJTreutingPMBrabbTGradyWMet alIncreased dietary vitamin D suppresses MAPK signaling, colitis, and colon cancer. Cancer Res (2014) 74(16):4398–408.10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-2820
56
Peyrin-BirouletLBeisnerJWangGNudingSOommenSTKellyDet alPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma activation is required for maintenance of innate antimicrobial immunity in the colon. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2010) 107(19):8772–7.10.1073/pnas.0905745107
57
HumeGEFowlerEVGriffithsLRDoeckeJDRadford-SmithGL. Common PPARgamma variants C161T and Pro12Ala are not associated with inflammatory bowel disease in an Australian cohort. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis (2012) 21(4):349–55.
58
ShresthaUKKarimiOCrusiusJBZhouFWangZChenZet alDistribution of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma polymorphisms in Chinese and Dutch patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis (2010) 16(2):312–9.10.1002/ibd.21059
59
Bassaganya-RieraJHontecillasR. Dietary conjugated linoleic acid and n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids in inflammatory bowel disease. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care (2010) 13(5):569–73.10.1097/MCO.0b013e32833b648e
60
FerreiraPCravoMGuerreiroCSTavaresLSantosPMBritoM. Fat intake interacts with polymorphisms of Caspase9, FasLigand and PPARgamma apoptotic genes in modulating Crohn’s disease activity. Clin Nutr (2010) 29(6):819–23.10.1016/j.clnu.2010.06.008
61
FergusonJFPhillipsCMMcMonagleJPérez-MartínezPShawDILovegroveJAet alNOS3 gene polymorphisms are associated with risk markers of cardiovascular disease, and interact with omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids. Atherosclerosis (2010) 211(2):539–44.10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2010.03.027
62
MartinHBurgessEJSmithWAMcGhieTKCooneyJMLunkenRCet alJAK2 and AMP-kinase inhibition in vitro by food extracts, fractions and purified phytochemicals. Food Funct (2015) 6(1):305–12.10.1039/c4fo00626g
63
NasefNAMehtaSMurrayPMarlowGFergusonLR. Anti-inflammatory activity of fruit fractions in vitro, mediated through toll-like receptor 4 and 2 in the context of inflammatory bowel disease. Nutrients (2014) 6(11):5265–79.10.3390/nu6115265
64
Ahmed NasefNMehtaSFergusonLR. Dietary interactions with the bacterial sensing machinery in the intestine: the plant polyphenol case. Front Genet (2014) 5:64.10.3389/fgene.2014.00064
65
ComitoDCascioARomanoC. Microbiota biodiversity in inflammatory bowel disease. Ital J Pediatr (2014) 40:32.10.1186/1824-7288-40-32
66
FukudaKFujitaY. Determination of the discriminant score of intestinal microbiota as a biomarker of disease activity in patients with ulcerative colitis. BMC Gastroenterol (2014) 14:49.10.1186/1471-230X-14-49
67
RossenNGMacDonaldJKde VriesEMD’HaensGRde VosWMZoetendalEGet alFecal microbiota transplantation as novel therapy in gastroenterology: a systematic review. World J Gastroenterol (2015) 21(17):5359–71.10.3748/wjg.v21.i17.5359
68
KellyCRKahnSKashyapPLaineLRubinDAtrejaAet alUpdate on fecal microbiota transplantation 2015: indications, methodologies, mechanisms, and outlook. Gastroenterology (2015) 149(1):223–37.10.1053/j.gastro.2015.05.008
69
GoldsmithJRSartorRB. The role of diet on intestinal microbiota metabolism: downstream impacts on host immune function and health, and therapeutic implications. J Gastroenterol (2014) 49(5):785–98.10.1007/s00535-014-0953-z
70
OttmanNSmidtHde VosWMBelzerC. The function of our microbiota: who is out there and what do they do?Front Cell Infect Microbiol (2012) 2:104.10.3389/fcimb.2012.00104
71
MarteauP. Therapy: probiotic-enriched artichokes for abdominal discomfort. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol (2012) 9(5):251–2.10.1038/nrgastro.2012.49
72
VenthamNTKennedyNANimmoERSatsangiJ. Beyond gene discovery in inflammatory bowel disease: the emerging role of epigenetics. Gastroenterology (2013) 145(2):293–308.10.1053/j.gastro.2013.05.050
73
KrissansenGWYangYMcQueenFMLeungEPeekDChanYCet alOverexpression of miR-595 and miR-1246 in the sera of patients with active forms of inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis (2015) 21(3):520–30.10.1097/MIB.0000000000000285
74
KalmanBToldyE. Genomic binding sites and biological effects of the vitamin D – VDR complex in multiple sclerosis [corrected]. Neuromolecular Med (2014) 16(2):265–79.10.1007/s12017-014-8301-2
75
MaYHuQLuoWPrattRNGlennSTLiuSet al1alpha,25(OH)2D3 differentially regulates miRNA expression in human bladder cancer cells. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol (2015) 148:166–71.10.1016/j.jsbmb.2014.09.020
76
SaksaNNemeARyynänenJUusitupaMde MelloVDVoutilainenSet alDissecting high from low responders in a vitamin D3 intervention study. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol (2015) 148:275–82.10.1016/j.jsbmb.2014.11.012
77
KnochBBarnettMPZhuSParkZANonesKDommelsYEet alGenome-wide analysis of dietary eicosapentaenoic acid- and oleic acid-induced modulation of colon inflammation in interleukin-10 gene-deficient mice. J Nutrigenet Nutrigenomics (2009) 2(1):9–28.10.1159/000134292
78
ZhangYHanLQiWChengDMaXHouLet alEicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) induced apoptosis in HepG2 cells through ROS-Ca(2+)-JNK mitochondrial pathways. Biochem Biophys Res Commun (2015) 456(4):926–32.10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.12.036
79
KorobkovaEA. Effect of natural polyphenols on CYP metabolism: implications for diseases. Chem Res Toxicol (2015) 28(7):1359–90.10.1021/acs.chemrestox.5b00121
80
AyissiVBEbrahimiASchluesennerH. Epigenetic effects of natural polyphenols: a focus on SIRT1-mediated mechanisms. Mol Nutr Food Res (2014) 58(1):22–32.10.1002/mnfr.201300195
81
DengYLuXWangLLiTDingYCaoHet alCurcumin inhibits the AKT/NF-kappaB signaling via CpG demethylation of the promoter and restoration of NEP in the N2a cell line. AAPS J (2014) 16(4):649–57.10.1208/s12248-014-9605-8
82
HaratiKSlodnikPChromikAMGoertzOHirschTKapalschinskiNet alResveratrol induces apoptosis and alters gene expression in human fibrosarcoma cells. Anticancer Res (2015) 35(2):767–74.
83
LinCHChaoLKHungPHChenYJ. EGCG inhibits the growth and tumorigenicity of nasopharyngeal tumor-initiating cells through attenuation of STAT3 activation. Int J Clin Exp Pathol (2014) 7(5):2372–81.
84
JovenJMicolVSegura-CarreteroAAlonso-VillaverdeCMenéndezJABioactive Food Components Platform. Polyphenols and the modulation of gene expression pathways: can we eat our way out of the danger of chronic disease?Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr (2014) 54(8):985–1001.10.1080/10408398.2011.621772
85
Plaza-DiazJGomez-LlorenteCFontanaLGilA. Modulation of immunity and inflammatory gene expression in the gut, in inflammatory diseases of the gut and in the liver by probiotics. World J Gastroenterol (2014) 20(42):15632–49.10.3748/wjg.v20.i42.15632
86
DruartCAlligierMSalazarNNeyrinckAMDelzenneNM. Modulation of the gut microbiota by nutrients with prebiotic and probiotic properties. Adv Nutr (2014) 5(5):624S–33S.10.3945/an.114.005835
87
SauerJRichterKKPool-ZobelBL. Products formed during fermentation of the prebiotic inulin with human gut flora enhance expression of biotransformation genes in human primary colon cells. Br J Nutr (2007) 97(5):928–37.10.1017/S0007114507666422
88
ZenhomMHyderAde VreseMHellerKJRoederTSchrezenmeirJ. Prebiotic oligosaccharides reduce proinflammatory cytokines in intestinal Caco-2 cells via activation of PPARgamma and peptidoglycan recognition protein 3. J Nutr (2011) 141(5):971–7.10.3945/jn.110.136176
89
MarlowGEllettSFergusonIRZhuSKarunasingheNJesuthasanACet alTranscriptomics to study the effect of a Mediterranean-inspired diet on inflammation in Crohn’s disease patients. Hum Genomics (2013) 7:24.10.1186/1479-7364-7-24
90
PolytarchouCKoukosGIliopoulosD. Systems biology in inflammatory bowel diseases: ready for prime time. Curr Opin Gastroenterol (2014) 30(4):339–46.10.1097/MOG.0000000000000081
91
CoughlinSS. Toward a road map for global -omics: a primer on -omic technologies. Am J Epidemiol (2014) 180(12):1188–95.10.1093/aje/kwu262
92
BennikeTBirkelundSStensballeAAndersenV. Biomarkers in inflammatory bowel diseases: current status and proteomics identification strategies. World J Gastroenterol (2014) 20(12):3231–44.10.3748/wjg.v20.i12.3231
93
KosticADXavierRJGeversD. The microbiome in inflammatory bowel disease: current status and the future ahead. Gastroenterology (2014) 146(6):1489–99.10.1053/j.gastro.2014.02.009
94
FiocchiC. Integrating omics: the future of IBD?Dig Dis (2014) 32(Suppl 1):96–102.10.1159/000367836
95
De PreterVVerbekeK. Metabolomics as a diagnostic tool in gastroenterology. World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther (2013) 4(4):97–107.10.4292/wjgpt.v4.i4.97
96
LinHMEdmundsSJZhuSHelsbyNAFergusonLRRowanDD. Metabolomic analysis reveals differences in urinary excretion of kiwifruit-derived metabolites in a mouse model of inflammatory bowel disease. Mol Nutr Food Res (2011) 55(12):1900–4.10.1002/mnfr.201100302
97
MartinFPRezziSPhilippeDTornierLMesslikAHölzlwimmerGet alMetabolic assessment of gradual development of moderate experimental colitis in IL-10 deficient mice. J Proteome Res (2009) 8(5):2376–87.10.1021/pr801006e
98
McHardyIHGoudarziMTongMRueggerPMSchwagerEWegerJRet alIntegrative analysis of the microbiome and metabolome of the human intestinal mucosal surface reveals exquisite inter-relationships. Microbiome (2013) 1(1):17.10.1186/2049-2618-1-17
99
ChapmanCGPekowJ. The emerging role of miRNAs in inflammatory bowel disease: a review. Therap Adv Gastroenterol (2015) 8(1):4–22.10.1177/1756283X14547360
100
BjerrumJTWangYHaoFCoskunMLudwigCGüntherUet alMetabonomics of human fecal extracts characterize ulcerative colitis, Crohn’s disease and healthy individuals. Metabolomics (2015) 11:122–33.10.1007/s11306-014-0677-3
101
DawiskibaTDejaSMulakAZabekAJawieńEPawełkaDet alSerum and urine metabolomic fingerprinting in diagnostics of inflammatory bowel diseases. World J Gastroenterol (2014) 20(1):163–74.10.3748/wjg.v20.i1.163
102
LinHMHelsbyNARowanDDFergusonLR. Using metabolomic analysis to understand inflammatory bowel diseases. Inflamm Bowel Dis (2011) 17(4):1021–9.10.1002/ibd.21426
103
AndersonNLAndersonNG. Proteome and proteomics: new technologies, new concepts, and new words. Electrophoresis (1998) 19(11):1853–61.10.1002/elps.1150191103
104
KnochBBarnettMPCooneyJMcNabbWCBarracloughDLaingWet alDietary oleic acid as a control fatty acid for polyunsaturated fatty acid intervention studies: a transcriptomics and proteomics investigation using interleukin-10 gene-deficient mice. Biotechnol J (2010) 5(11):1226–40.10.1002/biot.201000066
105
HuangHVangayPMcKinlayCEKnightsD. Multi-omics analysis of inflammatory bowel disease. Immunol Lett (2014) 162(2):62–8.10.1016/j.imlet.2014.07.014
106
BaffyG. The impact of network medicine in gastroenterology and hepatology. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol (2013) 11(10):1240–4.10.1016/j.cgh.2013.07.033
Summary
Keywords
vitamin D, phytochemicals, probiotics, genetics, genomics, microbiota
Citation
Ferguson LR (2015) Nutritional Modulation of Gene Expression: Might This be of Benefit to Individuals with Crohn’s Disease?. Front. Immunol. 6:467. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00467
Received
17 June 2015
Accepted
27 August 2015
Published
11 September 2015
Volume
6 - 2015
Edited by
Amélia M. Sarmento, Universidade Fernando Pessoa, Portugal
Reviewed by
Diane Bimczok, Montana State University, USA; Alberto Finamore, Agricultural Research Council, Italy
Updates

Check for updates
Copyright
© 2015 Ferguson.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Lynnette R. Ferguson, Discipline of Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland 1184, New Zealand, l.ferguson@auckland.ac.nz
Specialty section: This article was submitted to Mucosal Immunity, a section of the journal Frontiers in Immunology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.