Abstract
Objective:
Chronic lymphocytic inflammation with pontine perivascular enhancement responsive to steroids (CLIPPERS) is a rare syndrome with relapsing brainstem/cerebellar symptoms. To examine the pathogenic processes and investigate potential biomarkers, we analyzed combined materials of brain and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) by comprehensive methodologies.
Materials and methods:
To identify major pathways of perivascular inflammation in CLIPPERS, we first compared the CSF proteome (n = 5) to a neurodegenerative condition, Alzheimer’s disease (AD, n = 5). Activation of complement was confirmed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) on CLIPPERS brain samples (n = 3) and by ELISA in the CSF. For potential biomarkers, we used biomarker arrays, and compared inflammatory and vessel-associated proteins in the CSF of CLIPPERS (n = 5) with another inflammatory relapsing CNS disease, multiple sclerosis (RMS, n = 9) and healthy subjects (HS, n = 7).
Results:
Two hundred and seven proteins in the CSF discriminated CLIPPERS from AD. The complement cascade, immunoglobulins, and matrix proteins were among the most frequently represented pathways. Pathway analysis of upstream regulators suggested the importance of vascular cell adhesion protein 1 (VCAM1), IFN-γ, interleukin (IL)-1, and IL-10. Differential regulation of more than 10 complement proteins of the 3 complement pathways in the CSF pointed to the role of complement activation. IHC on brain samples confirmed the perivascular complement activation, i.e., deposition of C3bc, C3d, and the terminal C5b-9 complement complex that partially overlapped with accumulation of IgG in the vessel wall. Besides endothelial cell damage, reactivity to smooth muscle actin was lost in the walls of inflamed vessels, but the glia limitans was preserved. The semi-quantitative array indicated that increased level of IL-8/CXCL8 (p < 0.05), eotaxin/CCL11 (p < 0.01), and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (p < 0.05) in CSF could distinguish CLIPPERS from HS. The quantitative array confirmed elevated concentration of IL-8/CXCL8 and eotaxin/CCL11 compared to HS (p < 0.05, respectively) besides increased levels of ICAM-1 (p < 0.05) and VCAM-1 (p < 0.001). The increased concentration of VCAM-1 were able to differentiate CLIPPERS from RMS (p < 0.01), and a trend of elevated levels of ICAM-1 and IL-8/CXCL8 compared to RMS was also observed (p = 0.06, respectively).
Conclusion:
Complement activation, IgG deposition, and alterations of the extracellular matrix may contribute to inflammation in CLIPPERS. VCAM1, ICAM1, and IL-8 in the CSF may differentiate CLIPPERS from RMS.
Introduction
Chronic lymphocytic inflammation with pontine perivascular enhancement responsive to steroids (CLIPPERS) is a rare relapsing disorder with subacute brainstem features, brain MRI displaying multiple punctate or curvilinear foci of gadolinium enhancement, and a clear radiological/clinical response to steroid treatment (–). Several cases have been described, which suggest that the typical MRI appearance can be seen in a variety of other disorders, including primary angiitis of the CNS, multiple sclerosis (MS), and lymphoma (–). Nevertheless, a homogenous group of patients has the classical features of CLIPPERS, and these patients do not develop other conditions even after a long observation period. These patients require long-term immunosuppression to prevent relapses, indicating that immune-mediated CNS inflammation is a key component ().
The pathogenic mechanisms underlying the perivascular inflammation in CLIPPERS are largely unknown. Biopsies from affected areas show a predominant perivascular infiltration of CD3+ T cells, most of which are also CD4+ (). This inflammation also expands to supratentorial brain regions that appear normal on 3 T MRI (, , ). CD68+ histiocytes can be present in moderate numbers, and infiltrating macrophages as well as a small number of neutrophils and eosinophils are found in some cases (, , ). B cells are generally seen in smaller numbers than T cells (, ). Some patients have transient or persistent oligoclonal bands (OCB) in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), suggesting that antibodies may also be of importance (, , , , ). The role of B cells in the pathogenesis may be also indicated by cases successfully treated with anti-CD20 (rituximab), a B cell depletion therapy to treat antibody-mediated diseases (, ).
Novel diagnostic criteria have recently been proposed based on evaluation of clinical features, MRI appearance and pathological examination of patients with suspected CLIPPERS. These criteria allow the diagnosis of definite CLIPPERS only after neuropathological examination and the diagnosis of possible CLIPPERS in patients with classical symptoms and MRI appearance but without available neuropathology. These criteria might be useful to discriminate true CLIPPERS from the many mimics described ().
In this study, we aimed at identifying possible pathogenic mechanisms in CLIPPERS using patients fulfilling the new diagnostic criteria (). First, we examined CSF samples by proteomics, and compared pathway regulations to Alzheimer’s disease (AD), a neurodegenerative disorder of the CNS with limited inflammation in order to get an overview of activated inflammatory pathways in CLIPPERS. We verified major findings by other assays and on brain tissue from patients. To evaluate proteomics data as possible biomarkers, we next compared inflammatory and vessel-associated proteins by arrays in CLIPPERS to healthy controls, and then to another relapsing CNS disease, multiple sclerosis (RMS).
Materials and Methods
Patients and Controls
Brain biopsy, CSF, and serum samples were obtained for diagnostic purposes. Pathological samples were retrospectively analyzed (Table 1). Patients #1–2 and #4–5 fulfilled the 2017 proposed diagnostic criteria for definite CLIPPERS (). In patient #3a/b no biopsy was available, but the patient fulfilled the criteria for probable CLIPPERS ().
Table 1
| Patient 1 Danish | Patient 2 Danish | Patient 3a/b Danisha | Patient 4 German | Patient 5 Danishb | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Demographics and clinical data | |||||
| Sex/age | F/58 | M/42 | M/60 | F/69 | M/62 |
| Diagnosis | 2007 | 2010 | 2013 | 2010 | 2008 |
| Symptoms | Ataxia, dysarthria, paresthesia | Tetraspaticity, paraparesis, dysarthria, diplopia, ataxia | Diplopia, dysarthria, ataxia | Diplopia, dysarthria, dysphagia, ataxia, paresthesia | Diplopia, dysarthria, dysphagia, ataxia |
| Treatment | Prednisone, azathioprine | Prednisone, azathioprine | Prednisone, azathioprine | Methyl-prednisolone | Prednisone |
| Time of CSF collection | 2014 | 2014 | At diagnosis | At diagnosis | N/A |
| CSF, OCB | None | Persistent | None | None | None |
| Published | Ref. () | Ref. () | N/A | Ref. (, ) | Ref. () |
| Cerebrospinal fluid | |||||
| LC–MS/MSc | + | + | +/+ | + | – |
| C3bs, TCC | + | + | +/+ | ||
| RayBiotech biomarkers | + | + | +/+ | – | – |
| Mesoscale biomarkers | + | + | +/+ | + | – |
| Brain | |||||
| C9neo | + | + | – | – | + |
| IgG | – | – | – | – | + |
| C3bc, C3d, GFAP, CD31, SMA | – | – | – | – | + |
Demographics and methods used for the analysis of body fluids and tissues obtained from patients with chronic lymphocytic inflammation with pontine perivascular enhancement responsive to steroids.
aSame patient with sampling at two time points.
bPatient deceased.
cNon-modified proteins and posttranslational modifications.
CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; OCB, oligoclonal bands, LC–MS/MS; liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry; IHC, immunohistochemistry; TCC, soluble terminal complement complex; SMA, smooth muscle actin.
Patients #1 and #2 with CLIPPERS
The 58-year-old woman and 42-year-old man had a relapsing course responding to steroids and MRI features of CLIPPERS. The clinical and radiological features have been described previously ().
Patient #3a/b with CLIPPERS
The 60-year-old male was admitted in 2012 because of subacute ataxia, diplopia, and dysarthria. MRI revealed punctate gadolinium enhancement in the pons and cerebellar peduncle. CSF obtained twice showed no OCB. Symptoms and MRI changes remitted after high-dose corticosteroid treatment. After a second corticosteroid-responsive relapse in early 2013, azathioprine was started. His clinical condition is stable with low-dose steroid (10 mg prednisone daily) and azathioprine (175 mg daily).
Patient #4 With CLIPPERS
The 69-year-old woman was diagnosed with CLIPPERS in 2010. The clinical findings have been described previously (, ).
Patient #5 With CLIPPERS
The male patient died at the age of 62 years; autopsy data have recently been published ().
Control Subjects
For the examination of CSF proteome, samples from five patients with AD were included (). For the examination of cytokines, CSF samples from nine patients with RMS () without immunotherapy and from seven subjects without CNS disease (chronic headache) were used.
Standard Protocol Approvals, Registrations, and Patient Consents
This study was carried out in accordance with the recommendations of Declaration of Helsinki with written informed consent from all subjects. All subjects gave written informed consent in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The protocol was approved by the regional ethical committee and the Danish Data Protection Agency (S-20120066).
Proteomics
Sample Preparation and Labeling
Cerebrospinal fluid samples (n = 5) from patients #1–4 were used. Amino acid composition was analyzed for an estimation of total protein content, and the samples were treated with protease and phosphatase inhibitors. A pooled sample from patients #1 and #3a served as sample CLIPPERS-1, and a pooled sample from patients #2, #3b, and #4 served as sample CLIPPERS-2. These samples were compared to pooled CSF samples from five patients with AD. Samples were ultracentrifuged, and the supernatant was alkylated and digested (). Peptides from each pool were labeled with iTRAQ reagent. After pooling of the individual iTRAQ channels, the peptides were separated into (i) neutral glycosylated peptides; subjected to hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC) before liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS); (ii) non-modified peptides; fractioned by high pH reversed phase separation into six fractions and each fraction subjected to HILIC before LC–MS/MS; and (iii) sialylated N-linked glycopeptides and phosphorylated peptides; bound to TiO2 beads and subsequently analyzed using LC–MS/MS (, ).
LC–MS/MS
Peptides from the various fractions were analyzed by a nano-Easy LC (Thermo Fisher Scientific) coupled with a Q-Exactive mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Bremen, Germany). All peptide fractions were re-suspended in 0.1% formic acid (FA) and loaded onto a 2 cm 100 µm inner diameter pre-column using the nano-Easy LC. Peptides were eluted directly onto the analytical column using a gradient of 0–34% buffer B (90% Acetonitrile, 0.1% FA) over 30–90 min depending on the UV intensity of the individual HILIC fractions. All LC–MS/MS runs were performed using an analytical column of 20 cm × 75 µm inner diameter fused silica, packed with C18 material (Dr. Maisch, Ammerbuch-Entringen, Germany). Mass spectrometry was performed using higher energy collision fragmentation (HCD) fragmentation on a Q-Exactive instrument. MS settings: a full MS scan in the mass area of 400–1,800 Da was performed in the Orbitrap with a resolution of 70,000 FWHM and a target value of 1 × 106 ions. For each full scan the 12 most intense ions (charge states 2–5) were selected for HCD fragmentation and the fragments were detected at a resolution of 17,500 FWHM. Threshold for ion selection was 1.0e4, the AGC target value 2.0e4, activation time was 0.1 ms, isolation window was 1.5 Da, and normalized collision energy was 29.
Database Search
The MS raw files were processed and searched in Mascot and SEQUEST through the Proteome Discoverer 2.1 software (Thermo Fisher Scientific) against the human Uniprot database using the following parameters: precursor mass tolerance of 10 ppm; MSMS mass tolerance of 0.05 Da; enzyme: trypsin and up to two missed cleavages were allowed. For all data iTRAQ and carbamidomethylation was selected as fixed modifications. For the deglycosylated peptides the database search were performed with variable deamidation on N. When obtaining the final list of regulated proteins, we only used the proteins with two or more peptides. For the identification, the searched data were filtered to a threshold of 1% FDR using Percolator.
Neuropathological Examination
Vascular Pathology
Paraffin embedded brainstem biopsy materials from patients #1 and #2 and autopsy material from patients #5 were stained with C9neo (poyclonal) and hematoxylin–eosin (HE). For positive controls in the C9neo stainings, biopsy samples from patients with anti-AQP4 seropositive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) were used. Pathological specimens from the autopsy material (patient #5) were stained for IgG-cig and IgG-smi (Ventana Medical Systems, AZ, USA), GFAP (Ab6 Thermo Fisher Scientific), CD31 (PECAM; DAKO, polyclonal), C3bc (bH6; Hycult), and C3d (DAKO, polyclonal).
Indirect Immunofluorescence
Twenty-micrometer cryostat sections from formalin-fixed adult Sprague–Dawley rat brains were blocked with 5% goat serum followed by overnight incubation with undiluted CSF from patients #1–3. Following a standard washing procedure (Tris buffered saline), potential IgG binding was visualized with a secondary FITC-conjugated goat-anti-human IgG antibody (1:200, Alexa Flour 488, Thermofisher Scientific). Sections were counterstained with 10 µM 4′,6-diamidine-phenylindole dihydrochloride (DAPI, SigmaAldrich) and coverslipped using ProLong gold antifade (Thermofisher Scientific).
Binding of Isolated Serum IgG to CLIPPERS Brain
Three-micrometer brain stem sections from patient #6 were demasked and blocked with fetal bovine serum and were incubated with undiluted serum IgG (400 µg/ml), from patients #1–3 isolated by protein A affinity chromatography, acidic elution, and dialysis against PBS. Following standard washing procedure, sections were incubated for 2 h with HRP-conjugated rabbit anti-human IgG antibody (1:200, DAKO P0214). After a final rinse, sections were developed using diaminobenzidine dehydrated and coverslipped using Depex mounting medium. Digital images were obtained using a Leica microscope (Leica 4000B LED, Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) equipped with a Leica digital camera (Leica DFC420, Leica Microimaging).
Complement Activation in the CSF
Activation products C3bc and soluble terminal complement complex (TCC) were examined in the CSF as described (, ).
Soluble Biomarker Assays
Semi-Quantitative Assay
Cerebrospinal fluid samples from patients #1–4 and three control subjects were applied to the RayBiotech TM Human Inflammation Array C3 as described by the manufacturer.1 All samples were run in duplicate. Intensity of streptavidin binding was measured by CCD images of protein spots and subsequent measurement of grayscale intensity (range 0–256 AU) using NIH image analysis software.2
Quantitative Analysis
Cerebrospinal fluid samples used in the RayBiotech assay (patients #1–4) were also applied to MesoScale V-PLEX Human Biomarker 37-Plex Kit (Mesoscale Discovery, Rockville, MD, USA). We also included CSF samples from seven controls and nine patients with RRMS. All samples were run in duplicate.
Statistics
The identified and quantified peptides were imported into the Perseus program3 for statistic validation and t-testing to identify regulated proteins. Regulated proteins were exported and used for pathway analysis using the Ingenuity Pathway Analysis program and the STRING program.4 Proteins were used for quantitative analysis if they contained two or more unique peptides. The two-sample test was based on p-value threshold on 0.05. Mesoscale data were evaluated using one-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons and Tukey correction.
Results
Proteome of the CSF Obtained From CLIPPERS Patients
Altogether, 207 proteins in the CSF proteome and PTMome could discriminate CLIPPERS from AD: 51 proteins were upregulated and 156 proteins were downregulated in the CSF of patients with CLIPPERS (Figure 1; Table 2; Table S1 in Supplementary Material).
Figure 1
Table 2
| Protein | Function |
|---|---|
| Endothelial cells | |
| Isoform 2 of Ephrin type-A receptor 8 | Receptor tyrosine kinase; cell adhesion and migration |
| Ephrin type-A receptor 4 | Receptor tyrosin kinase; vascular formation and angiogenesis in the CNS; astrocyte differentiation; glial cell migration |
| Ephrin-B1 | Cell surface ligand of receptor tyrosin kinases; cell–cell adhesion |
| Vascular cell adhesion protein 1 (CD106) | Cell adhesion and migration; ligand for VLA-4 |
| Cell adhesion molecule 1 | Cell–cell adhesion; NK cytotoxity; IFN-γ production by CD8+ T cells; risk factor for venous thrombosis |
| Beta-2-glycoprotein 1 | Scavenges lipopolysaccharide; clears unwanted anionic cellular remnants; expressed on the surface and in endosomes of endothelial cells; target of antiphospholipid antibodies |
| Protocadherin-17 (PCDH17) | Cell–cell adhesion in the CNS; inhibits migration; promotes cell cycle arrest |
| Multimerin-1 (MMRN1, ECM) | Endothelial cell multimerin; carrier protein for platelet factors; ligand of integrins on activated platelets; coagulation and cell adhesion |
| Kallistatin | Tissue kallikrein inhibitor: vascular remodeling; inhibition of endothelial apoptosis; expressed by endothelial and smooth muscle cells of blood vessels |
| Perivascular extracellular matrix | |
| Vitronectin | Binds complement C9 and inhibits C9 polymerization and formation of the membrane attack complex (regulation of complement activation); plasminogen activation; negative regulation of blood coagulation; cell adhesion; its receptor is expressed on endothelial cells; arterial wall remodeling: promotes smooth muscle migration |
| Decorin | Inhibition of angiogenesis; binds to PDGF and inhibits its stimulatory activity on arterial smooth muscle cells |
| Laminin subunit gamma-1 | Basement membrane assembly; cell adhesion and migration |
| Laminin subunit alpha-4 | Regulates vascular endothelium cell survival; vessel wall formation in the skin |
| Extracellular matrix protein 2 | ECM organization; heparin and integrin binding |
| Periostin | Predictor of airway eosinophilia [interleukin (IL)-4, IL-13]; induced by injury in smooth muscles of the neointima and adventitia; vascular remodeling in experimental allergic granulomatous angiitis |
| Multimerin-1 | Extracellular matrix adhesion; adhesion of many different cell types in vitro, including activated platelets, neutrophils, and endothelial cells |
| Serum complement | |
| Complement C3 | Complement activation; central role |
| Complement component C9 | Complement activation; part of membrane attack complex (MAC) |
| Complement C2 | Complement activation (classic and lectin pathways) |
| Complement C4-A | Derived from proteolysis of complement C4 (classic pathway): as anaphylatoxin induces local inflammation |
| C4b-binding protein beta chain | Complement inhibitor: controls the classic pathway |
| Complement factor I | Complement inhibitor: inactivates the complement components C4b and C3b |
| Plasma protease C1 inhibitor (SERPING1) | Complement inhibitor: controls activation of the C1 complex (classic pathway) |
| Vitronectin | Complement inhibitor: binds complement C9 and inhibits C9 polymerization and formation of the MAC |
| Serum/plasma protein | |
| Fibrinogen gamma chain | Coagulation |
| Prothrombin | Coagulation |
| Coagulation factor XI | Coagulation |
| Plasma kallikrein | Fibrinolysis, proteolysis, proinflammation and anti-angiogenesis |
| Alpha-2-antiplasmin | Inactivates plasmin and fibrinolysis, serine protease inhibitor |
| Plasma serine protease inhibitor | Inactivates serine proteases |
| Alpha-1-antichymotrypsin | Protease inhibitor |
| Alpha-1-acid glycoprotein 1 (orosomucoid) | Acute phase protein, anti-inflammatory role |
| Serum amyloid A-4 protein | Acute phase protein |
| Ig kappa chain V-III region VG (fragment) | Immunoglobulin (IgG) |
| IgG J chain | IgG |
| Ig delta chain C region | IgG |
| Ig lambda chain V-I region HA | IgG |
| Ig heavy chain V-III region 23 | IgG |
| Insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 3 (IGFBP3) | Transport of IGF in the plasma |
| Inter-alpha-trypsin inhibitor heavy chain H1 | Carries hyaluronan in plasma; may stimulate phagocytotic cells |
| Phospholipid transfer protein | Phospholipid transfer |
| Haptoglobin | Binds hemoglobin |
| Selenoprotein P | Secreted glycoprotein, selenium homeostasis |
| Phosphatidylethanolamine-binding protein 4 | Secreted protein, lysosome, extracellular exosome; promotes cellular resistance to TNF-induced apoptosis |
| Perivascular infiltrate and ubiquitous | |
| V-type proton ATPase subunit S1 | Ubiquitous, ion transmembrane transport |
| Macrophage colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor | Release of pro-inflammatory cytokines by macrophages |
| Receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase gamma | Cell growth, differentiation |
| Cysteine-rich secretory protein 3 | Neutrophil degranulation |
| L-selectin (CD62L) | Lymphocyte homing receptor |
| Ephrin-B1 | T cell costimulation: negative feedback to TCR signals; neutrophils, macrophages and monocytes |
| Polypeptide N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 5 | Protein glycosylation |
| Protocadherin fat 2 | Membrane protein, cell adhesion |
Upregulated proteins in the cerebrospinal fluid of patients with chronic lymphocytic inflammation with pontine perivascular enhancement responsive to steroids compared to patients with Alzheimer’s disease.
Analysis of the proteomics dataset revealed that the complement and coagulation cascades, as well as matrix proteins- and endothelium-related molecules, were among the most frequent pathways (Figure 2; Table 2; Figure S1 and Table S2 in Supplementary Material). Among the 12 top networks, molecules located in plasma membrane were overrepresented. Besides the complement proteins and immunoglobulins (IgGs), the network analysis also suggested the importance of vascular cell adhesion protein 1 (VCAM1), cytokines IFN-γ, interleukin (IL)-1, and IL-10 (Figure S1 in Supplementary Material; Table 2), and these cytokines were also identified as upstream regulators of several differentially regulated proteins (Table S3 in Supplementary Material).
Figure 2
To gather further supporting evidence that complement activation contributes to the pathogenesis of CLIPPERS syndrome, we next investigated complement activation products in the CSF and in brain biopsy/autopsy samples of patients with CLIPPERS.
Complement Activation in the CLIPPERS CSF
Proteomics analysis of the CSF indicated that more than 10 proteins in the complement pathways were differentially regulated (Figure 2). To validate complement activation, we examined activation products in the CSF. The level of activation product C3bc and the soluble terminal complement complex (TCC) was measured in four CSF samples of three patients (#1, #2, #3a/b). In the CSF samples of patient #3a/b, concentration of C3bc was elevated (11.95 and 10.98 AU/ml; normal range 3–9 AU/ml), and soluble TCC was increased (0.184 and 0.117; normal range 0–0.013 AU/ml).
Complement Activation in the CLIPPERS Brain
To further validate the role of activated complement cascades in the pathogenesis of CLIPPERS, we examined deposition of the membrane attack complex (MAC) by the C9neo antibody on brain biopsy samples from two patients (#1, #2) and autopsy material from another patient (#5) (Figure 3). Proteomics of the CSF have been also analyzed in two of these three cases with brain materials (#1, #2, Table 1). Biopsy samples from patients with anti-AQP4 seropositive NMOSD served as controls (Figures 3A–C). We found C9neo staining in all three CLIPPERS patients. In the autopsy case, C9neo was found selectively in the vessel wall (Figures 3D–H) mainly with little inflammation, likely representing very early stages (Figures 3D,E). C9neo reactivity was also found in vessels, in which the wall was largely destroyed (Figure 3F). Less C9neo reactivity was seen in vessels with increasing inflammation, possibly representing late stages (Figures 3G–I).
Figure 3
Vascular Pathology and Perivascular IgG Deposition
Damage of the vessel wall was indicated by homogeneous diffuse red staining with HE in autopsy material from patient #5 (Figure 4A). GFAP staining did not show major injury of astrocytes, and glia limitans was preserved (Figure 4B). By contrast, partial loss of CD31 (PECAM) reactivity of affected vessels indicated damage of endothelial cells (Figure 4C). The muscular vessel wall was also affected: smooth muscle actin (SMA) staining was in part lost in the walls of inflamed vessels (Figure 4D). This vessel pathology was associated with IgG deposition (Figures 4E,I) and complement activation (C3bc, C3d, and C9neo), which was clearly accentuated in the vessel wall (Figures 4F–I). Reactivity with IgG and complement deposition partially overlapped (Figure 4I).
Figure 4
To investigate specific IgG binding to CNS structures, we incubated a pool of four CSF samples from patients #1, #2, and #3a/3b with rat brain tissue. Isolated serum IgG from the same three patients were also incubated with formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue obtained from patient #5. We could not identify specific IgG staining in any of these experiments (data not shown).
Potential Biomarkers of in the CSF of CLIPPERS
The obtained proteomics data suggested the role of cytokines and integrins in network, pathway, and upstream regulator analyses, and we also considered endothelial stress/activation based on the pathology data. Therefore, we next investigated if these molecules may differentiate CLIPPERS from healthy controls and another relapsing inflammatory disease, multiple sclerosis (RMS).
We first compared the CSF from CLIPPERS patients to healthy controls by the semi-quantitative RayBiotech array. IL-8, eotaxin (CCL11), and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (GCSF) could distinguish CLIPPERS from HS (Figure 5).
Figure 5
Next, we compared CSF of CLIPPERS to CSF obtained from HS and RMS by the quantitative MesoScale V-PLEX Kit (Figure 6). This confirmed that IL-8 and eotaxin (CCL11) are increased the CSF of patients compared to HS. In addition, VCAM-1, ICAM-1, serum amyloid A, and soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 (Flt1/VEGFR-1) could also distinguish CLIPPERS from HS. Elevated concentration of VCAM-1 distinguished the CLIPPERS CSF from RMS, and we also observed a trend of elevated IL-8 and ICAM-1 in the CSF of CLIPPERS compared to RMS (p = 0.06, respectively).
Figure 6
Discussion
Mechanisms underlying inflammation in CLIPPERS are largely unknown. To investigate these, we examined the proteome in the CSF of CLIPPERS patients compared to non-inflammatory brain disease AD. AD is a classic neurodegenerative disease of the CNS. Although the role of innate immune responses is well established, adaptive immune-system driven effects, mediated by T and B cells, appear at present to be far less important in AD (). There is evidence of T cell infiltration into the brain in AD, nevertheless perivascular adaptive inflammatory responses are absent in contrast in CLIPPERS (). In the first step, therefore we aimed to identify the broadest spectrum of dysregulated proteins comparing two CNS diseases with different pathogenesis and cellular responses, thus also aiming at dissecting proteins related to CNS tissue injury from dysregulated proteins associated with CLIPPERS-specific inflammation. The overrepresentation of dysregulated proteins related to complement activation in the proteome of CLIPPERS was then validated on brain samples. By using a broad screening approach, we next compared the CSF of patients from CLIPPERS to another relapsing inflammatory CNS disease, relapsing MS and to healthy controls in order to partially validate proteomics data and to identify potential biomarkers for CLIPPERS.
Cerebrospinal fluid proteins that were regulated differently in CLIPPERS compared to AD included the following: (i) proteins related to endothelial damage and activation including molecules involved in leukocyte recruitment (e.g., adhesion molecules, VCAM-1, cell adhesion molecule 1) and vascular formation/remodeling (ephrin signaling); (ii) serum proteins, which are expected to reach the brain, when endothelial cells are damaged (e.g., IgGs, complement, coagulation factors, acute phase proteins, etc.); (iii) molecules of the perivascular extracellular matrix important in vascular wall formation and remodeling, regulation of coagulation and complement activation, and cell adhesion (e.g., vitronectin, decorin, laminin, periostin, multimerin-1, and extracellular matrix protein 2); and (iv) molecules related to perivascular infiltrates (e.g., CSF1R). Pathway and network analysis also indicated the importance of coagulation, cell adhesion and migration, the complement cascade, ephrin signaling, extracellular matrix-surface interaction, and contactin-mediated cell surface interactions. A network analysis for up-stream regulators of the differentially expressed proteins indicated the importance of several pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines: IFN-γ, IL-1β, TNF-β, IL-6, IL-4, and IL-10. The differential presence of IgGs in the CSF proteome was unrelated to the presence of OCB; only one patient had temporary OCB in the CSF, and the hierarchical clustering identified similarly significant presence of IgGs and complement in the CSF samples without OCB.
We found upregulation of several key members of the complement pathways in CLIPPERS CSF: C4, C4a, C4b, C2, and C2a (lectin and classic pathways); C3, C3a, and C3b (classic, lectin, and alternative pathways); and C9 (part of the terminal MAC). Complement activation products and the terminal complement complex (TCC) could be detected around plaques also in AD (), but the massive dysregulation of complement proteins in the CLIPPERS CSF compared to AD suggested a role of the complement system very different from that in a classic neurodegenerative disease. Our data indicated activation of the complement system, where at least one pathway (the classical or lectin pathway) and potentially the alternative pathway may drive activation. Complement activation was verified by elevated levels of C3bc and the soluble TCC in the CSF, and by perivascular deposition of the terminal MAC in three brains. These data altogether suggest the central role of complement activation in the pathogenesis of CLIPPERS. We also found perivascular deposition of IgG in vessels with largely destroyed walls confirming the CSF proteome data. Endothelial cells and the muscular vessel wall were primarily injured.
The deposition of complement and IgG may be a consequence of vascular damage due to leakage into the perivascular area; however, the increased levels of soluble TCC in the CSF and perivascular deposition of the MAC in the brain rather suggest local activation. The proteome and pathological data indicated endothelial damage and activation, leakage of serum proteins, vascular inflammation, and fibrosis with dysregulated perivascular extracellular matrix proteins. This may suggest that CLIPPERS is a form of vasculitis. The absence of vessel wall necrosis, granulocyte, or eosinophil infiltration does not support necrotizing vasculitis. Activation of the complement argues against an entirely T cell mediated vasculitis. If complement activation in CLIPPERS were mediated by antibodies, our data would suggest an antigen in the perivascular extracellular matrix. Autoimmunity against laminins has been described in autoimmune diseases (–), pregnancy loss (), and Chagas disease (31). Complement 3 deficiency prolongs survival of laminin-deficient mice (32). Antibodies against laminin are able to fix and activate complement (33, 34). The clinical response to anti-CD20 (rituximab) also suggests that antibodies may play a role at least in some of the patients (, ). Still, we were unable to detect specific binding of IgGs by incubating brain tissue with CLIPPERS CSF and serum IgG with. This could be explained by low abundance of a given autoantibody in CSF/purified IgG pool from serum; nevertheless, histology of CLIPPERS brains indicated incomplete overlap between IgG and C9neo reactivity. This may argue against complement activation by specific autoantibodies. Two additional scenarios may explain complement activation: primary deficiency/local inefficiency of complement-regulating proteins, or alteration of extracellular matrix proteins that induces complement activation. We found downregulation of CD59 that blocks aggregation of C9 and formation of the MAC. Mutations in CD59 result in recurrent brain infarctions and absent protein expression on brain endothelial cells (35). Proteolytic fragments or exposed neo-epitopes by altered composition of the ECM may also activate complement (36, 37). Decorin binds C1q, and suppresses C1q-induced IL-8 production by endothelial cells; biglycan binds mannose-binding lectin and inhibits activation of the lectin pathway (38). Vitronectin regulates the MAC formation (39). Since a number of ECM proteins were differentially regulated in the CLIPPERS CSF proteome, complement activation by the alterations of ECM can be a possibility: induced by altered ECM exposing neo-epitopes or by leaking Ig, or C3b deposition in the presence of deficient inhibition by complement-regulating ECM proteins or CD59.
Cytokines were upregulated in the CLIPPERS CSF proteome, or were among upstream regulators, including IFN-γ, IL-1β, and IL-10. VCAM-1 was one of the most upregulated proteins and was overrepresented in networks and pathways. Considering these data that reflect the role of cytokines and the possible role of endothelial stress/activation, we decided to use a broader array screening approach. First, we compared CSF levels of cytokines, chemokines, and biomarkers related to angiogenesis/endothelial stress to HS with a semi-quantitative assay, then we used a quantitative array to compare data also to RMS besides HS.
Upregulated VCAM-1 in the CSF could distinguish CLIPPERS from both HS and RMS. Increased concentration of ICAM-1 was also observed compared to HS and as a trend when compared to RMS. These are key molecules in adhesion of lymphocytes and monocytes. Pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-8, increase expression of ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 by endothelial cells (40). Indeed, increased concentration of IL-8 (CXCL8) in the CSF also differentiated CLIPPERS from HS, and there was a trend of elevated levels compared to RMS. IL-8 is produced by endothelial and glial cells, and mediates chemotaxis and neutrophil effector functions; neuroprotective and neurotrophic functions of CXCL8 are also emerging (41). Another chemokine eotaxin (CCL11) was also able to separate CLIPPERS from HS and RMS. Based on these findings, we suggest that upregulation of key molecules in chemotaxis, such as VCAM-1, ICAM-1, IL-8 (CXCL8), and eotaxin (CCL11) may serve as biomarkers for differentiating CLIPPERS from RMS. Moreover, GCSF could also differentiate CLIPPERS from HS and its upregulation may be a protective mechanism in response to inflammation (42). The tyrosine kinase sFlt-1 (VEGFR-1) was downregulated compared to HS. This molecule binds free placental growth factor and vascular endothelial growth factor, suppressing the proangiogenic effects (43). Thus, downregulation of sFlt-1 in CSF may indicate a net proangiogenic function in CLIPPERS.
This study is limited by the restricted number of patients. However, the number of reported cases worldwide is below 70, and CSF and brain samples are extremely rare. Here, we were able to combine analysis of both CSF and brain material, and in two patients, we even examined paired brain-CSF samples. Confirmation of results on samples from different compartments by other additional experiments and combination of different methods/compartments validating the findings strengthens the validity of our findings.
In conclusion, our data strongly suggest that perivascular complement activation is involved in the pathogenesis of CLIPPERS. Proteomics and molecular profiling of the CSF by soluble arrays points to the importance of vessel dysfunction: disruption of the BBB, attraction and adhesion of immune cells to endothelial cells, and angiogenesis. Upregulated VCAM-1, ICAM-1, IL-8, and eotaxin in the CSF may be potential biomarkers in CLIPPERS; nevertheless, their differentiating role from RMS should be confirmed by a higher number of CSF samples. The cause of complement activation in CLIPPERRS is unclear: complement binding, alteration of the ECM, and search for specific antigens may be candidates for further studies.
Statements
Ethics statement
This study was carried out in accordance with the recommendations of Declaration of Helsinki with written informed consent from all subjects. All subjects gave written informed consent in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The protocol was approved by the regional ethical committee and the Danish Data Protection Agency (S-20120066).
Author contributions
MB and ZI: design and conceptualization, clinical data, analysis and interpretation of the data, drafting the manuscript. AH: performing proteomics, analysis of data. LD: analysis and interpretation of proteomics data. KR, DK, TS, HN, and FP: clinical data and interpretation. PG: examination of complement in the CSF, analysis and interpretation of data, drafting part of the manuscript. RH: indirect immunohistochemistry, analysis and interpretation of data. BC: indirect immunohistochemistry, analysis and interpretation of data, pathology. SH: isolation of IgG. PJ: analysis and interpretation of proteomics data, performing RayBiotech assay. MM: biomarker analysis and interpretation of data. HL: histology, analysis and interpretation of data, drafting part of the manuscript. ML: analysis and interpretation of proteomics.
Funding
Lundbeckfonden R118-A11472, Jascha Fonden 5589, Scleroseforeningen R399-A28099-B15690 and R431-A29926, Region of Southern Denmark 14/24200, Direktør Ejnar Jonasson kaldet Johnsen og hustrus mindelegat 5609, Odense University Hospital R9-A559 and A474 (Denmark) to ZI. The Danish Research Council of Independent Research (DFF-6110-00489) to PG. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Exc 257) and the German Ministry for Education and Research (BMBF Competence Network Multiple Sclerosis) to FP. German Ministry for Education and Research (BMBF Competence Network Multiple Sclerosis) to KR. This work was supported by a generous grant from the VILLUM Foundation to the VILLUM Center for Bioanalytical Sciences at the University of Southern Denmark. This study is not sponsored by industry.
Acknowledgments
We would like to acknowledge Mr. Jesper Andresen for help technical assistance.
Conflict of interest
MB reports grant from Lundbeck A/S outside of the submitted work. AH, LD, PG, RH, BK, DK, TS, SH, HN, PJ, and MM report no disclosures. KR reports grants from German Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF/KKNMS, Competence Network Multiple Sclerosis) during the conduct of the study; grants and personal fees from Novartis, personal fees from Bayer Healthcare, personal fees from Biogen Idec, grants and personal fees from Merck Serono, personal fees from Sanofi-Aventis/Genzyme, personal fees from Teva Pharmaceuticals, grants from Guthy Jackson Charitable Foundation, outside the submitted work. FP reports grants and personal fees from various pharmaceutical companies outside the submitted work. HL reports personal fees from Novartis, personal fees from Sanofi Aventis, personal fees from TEVA, personal fees from Roche outside the submitted work. ZI reports grants from Lundbeckfonden, grants from Scleroseforeningen during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Biogen Idec, grants and personal fees from Sanofi Genzyme, personal fees from Novartis, personal fees from Merck Serono outside the submitted work.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2018.00741/full#supplementary-material.
Footnotes
1.^http://www.raybiotech.com/files/manual/Antibody-Array/AAH-INF-3.pdf.
2.^https://imagej.nih.gov/nih-image/.
References
1
PittockSJDebruyneJKreckeKNGianniniCvan den AmeeleJDe HerdtVet alChronic lymphocytic inflammation with pontine perivascular enhancement responsive to steroids (CLIPPERS). Brain (2010) 133:2626–34.10.1093/brain/awq164
2
SimonNGParrattJDBarnettMHBucklandMEGuptaRHayesMWet alExpanding the clinical, radiological and neuropathological phenotype of chronic lymphocytic inflammation with pontine perivascular enhancement responsive to steroids (CLIPPERS). J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry (2012) 83:15–22.10.1136/jnnp-2011-301054
3
TaiebGDuflosCRenardDAudoinBKaphanEPelletierJet alLong-term outcomes of CLIPPERS (chronic lymphocytic inflammation with pontine perivascular enhancement responsive to steroids) in a consecutive series of 12 patients. Arch Neurol (2012) 69:847–55.10.1001/archneurol.2012.122
4
ButtmannMMetzIBrechtIBrückWWarmuth-MetzM. Atypical chronic lymphocytic inflammation with pontocerebellar perivascular enhancement responsive to steroids (CLIPPERS), primary angiitis of the CNS mimicking CLIPPERS or overlap syndrome? A case report. J Neurol Sci (2013) 324:183–6.10.1016/j.jns.2012.10.017
5
De GraaffHJWattjesMPRozemuller-KwakkelAJPetzoldAKillesteinJ. Fatal B-cell lymphoma following chronic lymphocytic inflammation with pontine perivascular enhancement responsive to steroids. JAMA Neurol (2013) 70:915–8.10.1001/jamaneurol.2013.2016
6
FerreiraRMMachadoGSouzaASLinKCorrêa-NetoY. CLIPPERS-like MRI findings in a patient with multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Sci (2013) 327:61–2.10.1016/j.jns.2013.01.032
7
LinAWDasSFraserJAAngLCFlorendo-CumbermackAJenkinsMEet alEmergence of primary CNS lymphoma in a patient with findings of CLIPPERS. Can J Neurol Sci (2014) 41:528–9.10.1017/S0317167100018631
8
TaiebGUro-CosteEClanetMLassmannHBenouaich-AmielALaurentCet alA central nervous system B-cell lymphoma arising two years after initial diagnosis of CLIPPERS. J Neurol Sci (2014) 344:224–6.10.1016/j.jns.2014.06.015
9
BlaabjergMRuprechtKSinneckerTKondziellaDNiendorfTKerrn-JespersenBMet alWidespread inflammation in CLIPPERS syndrome indicated by autopsy and ultra-high-field 7T MRI. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm (2016) 3:226.10.1212/NXI.0000000000000226
10
TobinWOGuoYKreckeKNParisiJELucchinettiCFPittockSJet alDiagnostic criteria for chronic lymphocytic inflammation with pontine perivascular enhancement responsive to steroids (CLIPPERS). Brain (2017) 140:2415–25.10.1093/brain/awx200
11
Kerrn-JespersenBMLindelofMIllesZBlaabjergMLundELKlausenCet alCLIPPERS among patients diagnosed with non-specific CNS neuroinflammatory diseases. J Neurol Sci (2014) 343:224–7.10.1016/j.jns.2014.06.002
12
MoreiraICrutoCCorreiaCAlvesJETaipaRPiresMM. Chronic lymphocytic inflammation with pontine perivascular enhancement responsive to steroids (CLIPPERS): postmortem findings. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol (2015) 74:186–90.10.1097/NEN.0000000000000162
13
CiprianiVPArndtNPytelPRederATJavedA. Effective treatment of CLIPPERS with long-term use of rituximab. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm (2018) 5(3):e448.10.1212/NXI.0000000000000448
14
ListJLesemannAWienerEWalterGHopmannDSchreiberSet alA new case of chronic lymphocytic inflammation with pontine perivascular enhancement responsive to steroids. Brain (2011) 134:e185.10.1093/brain/awr035
15
GuoLHAlexopoulosPEiseleTWagenpfeilSKurzAPerneczkyR. The national institute on aging-Alzheimer’s association research criteria for mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer’s disease: predicting the outcome. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci (2013) 263:325–33.10.1007/s00406-012-0349-0
16
PolmanCHReingoldSCBanwellBClanetMCohenJAFilippiMet alDiagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria. Ann Neurol (2011) 69:292–302.10.1002/ana.22366
17
PalmisanoGParkerBLEngholm-KellerKLendalSEKulejKSchulzMet alA novel method for the simultaneous enrichment, identification, and quantification of phosphopeptides and sialylated glycopeptides applied to a temporal profile of mouse brain development. Mol Cell Proteomics (2012) 11:1191–202.10.1074/mcp.M112.017509
18
Engholm-KellerKBirckPStørlingJPociotFMandrup-PoulsenTLarsenMR. TiSH – a robust and sensitive global phosphoproteomics strategy employing a combination of TiO2, SIMAC, and HILIC. J Proteomics (2012) 75:5749–61.10.1016/j.jprot.2012.08.007
19
GarredPMollnesTELeaT. Quantification in enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay of a C3 neoepitope expressed on activated human complement factor C3. Scand J Immunol (1988) 27:329–35.10.1111/j.1365-3083.1988.tb02354.x
20
MollnesTELeaTFrolandSSHarboeM. Quantification of the terminal complement complex in human plasma by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay based on monoclonal antibodies against a neoantigen of the complex. Scand J Immunol (1985) 22:197–202.10.1111/j.1365-3083.1985.tb01871.x
21
Van EldikLJCarrilloMCColePEFeuerbachDGreenbergBDHendrixJAet alThe roles of inflammation and immune mechanisms in Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement (N Y) (2016) 2:99–109.10.1016/j.trci.2016.05.001
22
McManusRMMillsKHLynchMA. T cells-protective or pathogenic in Alzheimer’s disease?J Neuroimmune Pharmacol (2015) 10:547–60.10.1007/s11481-015-9612-2
23
MorganBP. Complement in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease. Semin Immunopathol (2018) 40:113–24.10.1007/s00281-017-0662-9
24
WolffPGKühlUSchultheissHP. Laminin distribution and autoantibodies to laminin in dilated cardiomyopathy and myocarditis. Am Heart J (1989) 117:1303–9.10.1016/0002-8703(89)90410-9
25
GabrielliAMontroniMRupoliSCanigliaMLDeLustroFDanieliG. A retrospective study of antibodies against basement membrane antigens (type IV collagen and laminin) in patients with primary and secondary Raynaud’s phenomenon. Arthritis Rheum (1988) 31:1432–6.10.1002/art.1780311114
26
DainichiTKogaHTsujiTIshiiNOhyamaBUedaAet alFrom anti-p200 pemphigoid to anti-laminin gamma1 pemphigoid. J Dermatol (2010) 37:231–8.10.1111/j.1346-8138.2009.00793.x
27
CaproniMAntigaECardinaliCDel BiancoEFabbriP. Antilaminin-1 antibodies in cutaneous lupus erythematosus patients. Lupus (2009) 18:858.10.1177/0961203308101957
28
GrothSVafiaKReckeADähnrichCZillikensDStöckerWet alAntibodies to the C-terminus of laminin γ1 are present in a distinct subgroup of patients with systemic and cutaneous lupus erythematosus. Lupus (2012) 21:482–1483.10.1177/0961203312460113
29
FloreaFBernardsCCaproniMKleindienstJHashimotoTKochMet alEx vivo pathogenicity of anti-laminin γ1 autoantibodies. Am J Pathol (2014) 184:494–506.10.1016/j.ajpath.2013.10.019
30
InagakiJKondoALopezLRShoenfeldYMatsuuraE. Anti-laminin-1 autoantibodies, pregnancy loss and endometriosis. Clin Dev Immunol (2004) 11:261–6.10.1080/17402520400001678
31
SzarfmanATerranovaVPRennardSIFoidartJMde Fatima LimaMScheinmanJIet alAntibodies to laminin in Chagas’ disease. J Exp Med (1982) 155:1161–71.10.1084/jem.155.4.1161
32
ConnollyAMKeelingRMStreifEMPestronkAMehtaS. Complement 3 deficiency and oral prednisolone improve strength and prolong survival of laminin alpha2-deficient mice. J Neuroimmunol (2002) 127:80–7.10.1016/S0165-5728(02)00104-2
33
FeintzeigIDAbrahamsonDRCybulskyAVDittmerJESalantDJ. Nephritogenic potential of sheep antibodies against glomerular basement membrane laminin in the rat. Lab Invest (1986) 54:531–42.
34
FoidartJMHuntJLapiereCMNusgensBDe RyckerCBruwierMet alAntibodies to laminin in preeclampsia. Kidney Int (1986) 29:1050–7.10.1038/ki.1986.106
35
HalilogluGMaluendaJSayinbaturBAumontCTemucinCTavilBet alEarly-onset chronic axonal neuropathy, strokes, and hemolysis: inherited CD59 deficiency. Neurology (2015) 84:1220–4.10.1212/WNL.0000000000001391
36
Fernandez-GodinoRGarlandDLPierceEA. A local complement response by RPE causes early-stage macular degeneration. Hum Mol Genet (2015) 24:5555–69.10.1093/hmg/ddv287
37
Fernandez-GodinoRPierceEAGarlandDL. Extracellular matrix alterations and deposit formation in AMD. Adv Exp Med Biol (2016) 854:53–8.10.1007/978-3-319-17121-0_8
38
GroeneveldTWOroszlánMOwensRTFaber-KrolMCBakkerACArlaudGJet alInteractions of the extracellular matrix proteoglycans decorin and biglycan with C1q and collectins. J Immunol (2005) 175:4715–23.10.4049/jimmunol.175.7.4715
39
SinghBSuYCRiesbeckK. Vitronectin in bacterial pathogenesis: a host protein used in complement escape and cellular invasion. Mol Microbiol (2010) 78:545–60.10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07373.x
40
MaQChenSKlebeDZhangJHTangJ. Adhesion molecules in CNS disorders: biomarker and therapeutic targets. CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets (2013) 12:392–404.10.2174/1871527311312030012
41
SempleBDKossmannTMorganti-KossmannMC. Role of chemokines in CNS health and pathology: a focus on the CCL2/CCR2 and CXCL8/CXCR2 networks. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab (2010) 30:459–447.10.1038/jcbfm.2009.240
42
SchneiderAKrügerCSteiglederTWeberDPitzerCLaageRet alThe hematopoietic factor G-CSF is a neuronal ligand that counteracts programmed cell death and drives neurogenesis. J Clin Invest (2005) 115:2083–98.10.1172/JCI23559
43
RoskoskiRJr. VEGF receptor protein-tyrosine kinases: structure and regulation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun (2008) 375:287–91.10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.07.121
Summary
Keywords
CLIPPERS, proteomics, complement, cerebrospinal fluid, VCAM-1, ICAM-1, interleukin-8, multiple sclerosis
Citation
Blaabjerg M, Hemdrup AL, Drici L, Ruprecht K, Garred P, Höftberger R, Kristensen BW, Kondziella D, Sejbaek T, Hansen SW, Nielsen HH, Jensen P, Meyer M, Paul F, Lassmann H, Larsen MR and Illes Z (2018) Omics-Based Approach Reveals Complement-Mediated Inflammation in Chronic Lymphocytic Inflammation With Pontine Perivascular Enhancement Responsive to Steroids (CLIPPERS). Front. Immunol. 9:741. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00741
Received
12 January 2018
Accepted
26 March 2018
Published
23 April 2018
Volume
9 - 2018
Edited by
Fabienne Brilot, University of Sydney, Australia
Reviewed by
Bruno Gran, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, United Kingdom; Rishein Gupta, University of Texas at San Antonio, United States
Updates
Copyright
© 2018 Blaabjerg, Hemdrup, Drici, Ruprecht, Garred, Höftberger, Kristensen, Kondziella, Sejbaek, Hansen, Nielsen, Jensen, Meyer, Paul, Lassmann, Larsen and Illes.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Zsolt Illes, zsolt.illes@rsyd.dk
Specialty section: This article was submitted to Multiple Sclerosis and Neuroimmunology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Immunology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.