Abstract
Graft-vs.-host disease (GVHD) remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Significant progresses have been made in defining the dichotomous role of dendritic cells (DCs) in the development of GVHD. Host-derived DCs are important to elicit allogeneic T cell responses, whereas certain donor-types of DCs derived from newly engrafted hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (HSPCs) can amply this graft-vs.-host reaction. In contrast, some DCs also play non-redundant roles in mediating immune tolerance. They induce apoptotic deletion of host-reactive donor T cells while promoting expansion and function of regulatory T cells (Treg). Unfortunately, this tolerogenic effect of DCs is impaired during GVHD. Severe GVHD in patients subject to allo-HSCT is associated with significantly decreased number of circulating peripheral blood DCs during engraftment. Existing studies reveal that GVHD causes delayed reconstitution of donor DCs from engrafted HSPCs, impairs the antigen presentation function of newly generated DCs and reduces the capacity of DCs to regulate Treg. The present review will discuss the importance of DCs in alloimmunity and the mechanism underlying DC reconstitution after allo-HSCT.
Introduction
Allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is a potentially curative therapy for many hematological malignancies, such as leukemia, lymphoma, and multiple myeloma (, ). This beneficial effect is largely derived from infused donor immune cells that can eliminate malignant cells, a process known as graft-vs.-leukemia (GVL) response (–). However, the success of the procedure is limited by the life-threatening complication graft-vs.-host disease (GVHD), in which the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, skin and liver are preferentially damaged (, –).
GVHD is mediated by infused donor T cells that recognize and react to histocompatibility differences between the host and donor (–). Host-derived antigen-presenting cells (APCs) can directly present antigens to prime allogenic donor T cells, whereas donor-derived APCs can present host antigens to donor T cells via indirect antigen presentation (, , ). Initial studies demonstrate that host APCs are critical for donor CD8+ T cell-mediated GVHD. Subsequent studies indicate that either host or donor APCs are sufficient to induce CD4+ T cell-dependent GVHD (–, –). Importantly, unlike T cell responses to pathogens in which hematopoietic APCs prime T cells, alloreactive T cell responses in the setting of allo-HSCT may be primed by both hematopoietic and non-hematopoietic APCs (–, –).
DCs are the most potent professional APCs known to elicit primary T cell responses (–). Based on their surface phenotype, anatomical location and function, DCs at the steady state are broadly categorized into conventional DCs (cDCs) and plasmacytoid DCs (pDCs). Under inflammatory condition, both DC subsets undergo profound changes in their phenotype and functionality (–). For example, in response to inflammatory stimuli, DCs may be primed selectively to produce special types of cytokines (e.g., IL-12, IL-23) and Notch ligands (e.g., Delta-like 1 (DLL1) and DLL4). These DC-derived molecules are important to instruct antigen-activated T cells to differentiate into distinct lineages of effector T cells, such as T helper (TH)1, TH17 cells, and cytotoxic T cells (CTLs) (–).
Over the past two decades, both clinical and preclinical studies have demonstrated dichotomous roles of DCs in GVHD (, 34, 35). While some DCs induce alloreactive T cell responses mediating host tissue injury, other DC subsets induce donor T cell tolerance against the host tissue. In this review, we will discuss these effects of DC-mediated immunogenicity and tolerogenicity during GVHD.
DC Induction of GVHD
DCs are specialized APCs that play non-redundant roles in regulating both immunity and tolerance (, , 36–44). In the setting of allo-HSCT, host-derived DCs are important for donor T cell-mediated GVHD in the liver, colon and skin (–, , , 35, 45). De novo generated donor APCs, including DCs, are also required to induce maximal GVHD through a complex mechanism (–, 35).
Host DCs and Initiation of Alloreactive T Cell Responses
Shlomchik and colleagues demonstrate, for the first time, that host hematopoietic APCs are critical for induction of the disease, and donor APCs can mediate maximal GVHD (, ). Subsequent studies reveal that host DCs, which are activated during preparative conditioning for allo-HSCT, present host antigens to prime donor CD4+ and CD8+ T cells and promote their proliferation and differentiation into alloreactive effector cells (, 46). Add-back of WT host-type cDCs or pDCs causes severe GVHD in mice lacking MHC class-I or MHC class-II, respectively (47), further strengthening the importance of host DCs in mediating GVHD (Table 1). However, these studies do not explain whether host DCs contribute to GVHD when all the other types of host APCs, including B cells, macrophages and non-hematopoietic APCs, are intact. For example, host B cells produced high levels of IL-10 to modulate alloreactive T cell responses in vivo (57), Recipient macrophages, which resist the conditioning regimen, persisted in patients for several weeks following allo-HSCT and limited the severity of GVHD (58). In contrast, non-hematopoietic APCs activated by irradiation induce potent allo-specific responses in peripheral tissues(, 59).
Table 1
| DC subset | Effect on GVHD | Origin | Method | GVHD model | Outcome | Mechanism | Authors/References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| cDCs or pDCs | Induction | Host | Add-back of cDCs or pDCs | Balb/c → B6 AKR → C3H | GVHD↑ | Prime allo-T cell response | Koyama et al. (47) |
| LCs | Induction | Host | Depletion of LCs | B6 → Balb/c | skin GVHD↓ | Increase donor T cell infiltrating in the skin | Merad et al. (40) |
| LCs | No effect | Host | Depletion of LCs | B6 → Balb/c C3H → B6 | GVHD maintained | - | Li et al. (48) |
| cDCs | Induction | Donor | Depletion of CD11c+ cDCs | B6 → Balb/c C3H → B6 B6 → B6D2F1 | GVHD↓ | Inhibit donor T cell proliferation | Markey et al. (49) |
| CD103+ CD11b−DCs | Induction | Donor | Depletion of CD103+CD11b− cDCs | B6 → Balb/c | GVHD↑ | Induce expansion and differentiation of donor T cells within the mLNs | Koyama et al. () |
| CD8α+ DCs | Tolerance | Host | Depletion of CD8+ cDCs | Balb/c → B6 | GVHD↑ | Reduce numbers of Tregs and TGF- β levels | Weber et al. (50) |
| CD8α+ DCs | Tolerance | Host | Pre-treatment of the recipient with Flt3L | B6 → B6D2F1 | GVHD↓ | Suppress donor T cell responses to host antigens | Teshima et al. (41) |
| CD8α+ DCs | Tolerance | Host | Pre-treatment of recipients with Flt3L | C3H → B6 B6 → B6D2F1 | GVHD↓ | Functionally delete of the alloreactive T-cell | Markey et al. (51) |
| CD8α+ cDCs | No effect | Host | Depletion of CD8+ cDCs | C3H → B6 | GVHD maintained | - | Toubai et al. (52) |
| CCR9+ pDCs | Tolerance | Host | Transfer of CCR9+ pDCs | Balb/c → B6 | GVHD↓ | Promote Treg expansion and function Suppress antigen-specific T responses | Hadeiba et al. (53) |
| SAHA treated moDCs | Tolerance | Host | Transfer of moDC treated with SAHA | Balb/c → B6 | GVHD↓ | Promote Treg expansion and function | Reddy et al. (54) |
| pre-pDCs | Tolerance | Donor | Depletion of pre-pDCs from BM grafts | B6 → Balb/c B6 → B6D2F1 | GVHD↑ | Inhibit T cell proliferation in a contact-dependent fashion | Banovic et al. (55) |
| pre-pDCs | Tolerance | Donor | Transfer of BM pre-pDCs | B6 → B10 | GVHD↓ | Increase Tregs and decrease alloreactive effector T cells | Lu et al. (56) |
Effect of different DC subsets in GVHD.
The role of host DCs in the development of GVHD in the presence of functional macrophages and non-hematopoietic APCs has been studied by several groups. Merad et al. examined the role of host Langerhans cells (LCs), a distinct subset of DCs located in the skin (), in cutaneous GVHD (40). Administration of donor T cells to bone marrow (BM)-chimeric mice with persistent host LCs, but not to mice whose LCs had been replaced, resulted in marked skin GVHD (40), suggesting that host LCs are important for mediating the disease in the skin. Intriguingly, other studies show that LCs were dispensable for the induction of skin GVHD (48). In one of those studies, donor T cells and BM cells were transferred into lethally irradiated transgenic recipient mice in which epidermal LCs expressed the Diphtheria toxin A (DTA) under the control of the human Langerin locus (48). Deficiency of LCs did not affect the development of either CD8+ T cell- or CD4+ T cell-mediated GVHD (48). How to reconcile these observations remains controversial.
Donor DCs Amplify GVH Reaction by Cross-Presenting Host-Type Antigen
In the setting of allo-HSCT, de novo generated donor APCs are also found to be important for GVHD (–, 35). Studies by Markey et al. suggested that donor cDCs isolated from the spleen were the most effective population in presenting alloantigens and stimulating naïve donor T cell responses early after allo-HSCT (49). Intriguingly, upon exposure to GVH inflammation, donor CD103+CD11b− cDCs, which are independent of the transcription factor IRF4 for their development (60, 61), captured alloantigen in the colon and migrated into the mesenteric lymph node to amplify alloreactive T cell responses (). This suggests that tissue resident DCs may play important roles in regulating GVH reactions, which is supported by our early studies. We found that selective depletion of both host- and donor-type APCs, including DCs, in visceral organs led to significantly reduced GVHD in the liver but not in the skin (). These observations suggest that donor DCs possess great capacity to orchestrate the alloreactive T cell response both in the lymphoid organ and non-lymphoid tissues, eliciting different types of GVHD.
DC-Derived IL-12 and Notch Ligands Shape Alloreactive T Cell Responses
DCs produce multiple molecules capable of shaping allogeneic T cell responses (Figure 1). For example, IL-12 produced by DCs drives expansion and differentiation of antigen-activated T cells (, , , , 62, 63). Donor BM cells lacking IL-12 p40 had significantly decreased capacity to promote effector differentiation and expansion in the mesenteric lymph nodes of mice receiving allogenic T cells. IL-12 derived from CD103+CD11b− cDCs promoted IFN-γ production in host-reactive T cells (). Notch signaling pathway is demonstrated as an important regulator of alloreactive T cell responses. Using a genetic approach, we reported that inhibition of pan-Notch receptor signaling in donor T cells significantly reduced severity and mortality of GVHD in mouse models (). Notch-deprived T cells proliferated and expanded in response to alloantigen in vivo, but failed to produce inflammatory cytokines, including IFN-γ, IL-17, and TNF-α (, ). In a separate study, we further observed that host DCs expressing DLL4 (named DLL4+ DCs), one of the ligands of Notch receptors, had greater ability to stimulate the generation of alloreactive effector T cells that produced IFN-γ and IL-17 compared to DLL4− DCs (64–66). Studies by Maillard et al. have shown that blockade of DLL4 could abrogate this effect and prevented GVHD while preserving anti-tumor activity (67, 68). Intriguingly, recent studies demonstrate that chemokine CCL19-expressing host cells, including both fibroblastic reticular cells and follicular DCs, were also the essential source of DLL4 for shaping alloreactive T cell response in mice subject to allo-HSCT (69). Collectively, DC-derived IL-12 and DLL4 are important for the generation of alloreactive effector T cells during GVHD.
Figure 1
Activation of DCs After the Conditioning Regimens for Allo-HSCT
DCs express pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), such as Toll-like receptors (TLRs), and nod-like receptors (NLRs) to respond to pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) (70–72). In addition, DCs are also capable to detect certain intracellular molecules, called damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), that are released from cells stressed, damaged and/or dying in the local tissue (73). When PAMPs or DAMPs are present, DCs are stimulated to migrate to lymphoid tissues and present both antigen and costimulatory molecules to T cells (73–75). Preparative conditioning regimens for allo-HSCT, including high-dose chemotherapy and/or total body irradiation, cause host tissue injuries. This leads to the release of proinflammatory cytokines (e.g., TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6) as well as DAMPs and PAMPs (74, 76).
Both PAMPs and DAMPs activate DCs through stimulating TLRs (i.e., TLR1-13) (Figure 1) (, , 76–78). TLR expression among DC subsets is heterogeneous: pDC mainly express TLR1, 7 and 9; CD8α+ DCs preferentially produce high levels of TLR3; whereas other cDC subsets express certain TLR subtypes but TLR9 (73–75, 79–85). Data from our studies and others suggested that Notch ligands DLL1 and DLL4 played non-redundant roles in activating Notch signaling to drive alloreactive T cell responses (, 64–66, 68). LPS (TLR4 agonist) rapidly induces Dll4 expression in human and murine DCs (65, 66, 81–83). Combined stimulation of human DCs with LPS with TLR7 agonist R848 further increases the expression of DLL4 (65, 83). TLR3 is critical for presentation of viral double-stranded RNA (83, 86). Reddy and colleagues found that TLR3 stimulation enhanced GVL response without exacerbating GVHD in mice (52). These observations explain, at least in part, how different pro-inflammatory stimuli induce distinct types of immune responses.
DC-mediated Donor T Cell Tolerance Against Host Tissues
Self-tolerance can be induced and maintained in different compartments of the immune system. During thymopoietic development, self-reactive T cells are clonally deleted in the thymus as a result of negative selection (, , 36, 87). However, thymopoiesis is impaired during GVHD (88, 89), which is associated with generation of alloreactive T cells that mediate chronic-like GVHD in mice (90, 91). Considered as a supplemental mechanism to central tolerance, peripheral tolerance however, is important to prevent autoimmunity (, , 36, 87). DCs are the crucial players mediating peripheral tolerance (, 36, 37, 44, 87). Therefore, we will review the tolerogenic role of DCs in the context of allo-HSCT.
cDCs
Both host and donor DCs may contribute to the induction of donor T cell tolerance against host tissues in mice undergoing allo-HSCT. Early studies by Teshima et al. reported that Flt3 ligand (Flt3L) treatment of recipient mice induced expansion of CD8α+ DCs that were poor stimulators of allogeneic T cells in cultures and had great ability to suppress donor T cell responses to host antigens in vivo (Table 1) (41). These Flt3L-treated recipient mice developed much less severe GVHD compared to untreated controls (41). However, whether these in vivo expanded CD8α+ DCs have direct effects on reducing GVHD was not examined in this study (41). Subsequent studies show that deletion of host CD11c+ cells in CD11c. DTR (diphtheria toxin receptor) transgenic recipient mice caused a strong increase in GVHD-related mortality (50). Since CD11c is also expressed on the surface of some macrophages (, , 62), the possibility that DT treatment might delete CD11c+ macrophages that mediate immune suppression cannot be ruled out. Other studies examined the impact of deleting CD8α+ DCs on GVHD development in recipient mice lacking Batf3 (50), which is a transcription factor crucial for the generation of CD8α+ DCs and migratory CD103+ cDCs (92, 93). Recipient mice lacking Batf3 developed more severe GVHD compared to WT mice and marked increase of proliferative donor T cells (50). This finding is further supported independently by studies from Hill and colleagues (51), but not from Reddy's group (52). However, whether transfer of CD8α+ DCs may directly suppress GVHD in mice has never been reported. Thus, the exact DC subset induced upon Flt3L treatment capable to reduce GVHD has never been clearly addressed.
pDCs
The important role of pDCs in modulating GVH response was initially shown in a mouse model of GVHD. Transfer of host-type CCR9+ pDCs inhibited GVHD in mice receiving MHC- or miHA-mismatched donor T cells (53). CCR9+ pDCs migrate to the GI tract through chemotaxis via their own chemokine receptor CCR9 and the ligand CCL25 in the environment. Upon stimulation with TLR9 agonist CpG ODNs, CCR9+ pDCs rapidly downregulate CCR9 from the original immature state and decrease the capacity to attenuate GVHD in vivo (53). Furthermore, precursor pDCs (pre-pDCs) were found to modulate GVHD in mouse models (55, 56). In vivo depletion of pre-pDCs using the antibody specific to PDCA-1, which is expressed on the surface of pDC lineage, significantly increased the severity of GVHD compared to recipient mice with intact donor pre-pDCs (55). Mechanistic analysis reveals that CCR9+ pDCs and pre-pDCs are capable to promote Treg expansion and function, as well as to suppress antigen-specific immune responses both in vitro and in vivo (55, 56). These observations identify the tolerogenic effect of pDCs on inducing donor T cells against host tissues.
Molecular Mechanisms by Which DCs Induce Donor T Cell Tolerance
Emerging evidence indicate that the mechanism responsible for DC-induced peripheral T cell tolerance can be broadly classified into two categories: intrinsic and extrinsic (, , 62, 87, 94). T cell intrinsic signal acts directly on the responding T cells, such as inhibition or deletion of specific T cells, while T cell extrinsic signal acts through additional cells or factors, such as Treg or suppressive cells (Figure 2).
Figure 2
Whether to induce immune activation or tolerance was initially correlated to the maturation state of DCs (62). Immature DCs generated from murine BM induced T cell unresponsiveness in vitro and prolonged cardiac allograft survival (43, 95). The immune tolerance induced by immature DCs was associated with their low expression of CD40 (which is essential to activation of CD4+ T cells) and the capacity to produce high levels of IL-10 (which inhibits T cell response). Probst et al. reported that resting DCs induced peripheral CD8+ T cell tolerance through activating the inhibitory signals PD-1 and CTLA4 on the T cell via PD-L1 and CD80/86, respectively (96–104). Under physiological conditions, these inhibitory molecules keep autoreactive T cells in check without causing autoimmunity. Blocking either PD-1 or CTLA4 abrogated CD8+ T cell tolerance induction and enhanced T cell priming while blocking both resulted in an synergistic effect on inducing CD8+ T cell tolerance (96). These observations suggest that DC-derived PD-L1 may promote T cell tolerance through triggering the T-cell intrinsic mechanism.
Treg and suppressive cells (e.g., myeloid-derived suppressive cells) play crucial roles in establishing and maintaining peripheral tolerance and are known to be important for reducing GVHD (105–108). Waller and colleagues have demonstrated that transfer of donor BM pre-pDCs attenuated GVHD in mice (56). They identified that donor pDCs activated donor T cells to produce IFN-γ, which then enhanced pDC synthesis of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO). Increased production of IDO by pDCs altered the balance between donor Treg and alloreactive effector T cells, thereby limiting the severity of GVHD (56). Other studies showed that GVH reaction also impaired the antigen presentation function of de novo generated donor cDCs, leading to dramatically decreased Treg expansion and function, leading to severe chronic GVHD (109). These observations suggest that reconstitution of tolerogenic DCs from engrafted donor hematopoietic cells may be crucial for preventing the occurrence of severe GVHD.
Reconstitution of Donor DCs After Allo-HSCT
Clinical studies indicated that impaired reconstitution of donor DCs correlates with the occurrence of severe GVHD (110–115). Wingard and colleagues examined the number of donor DCs in the circulating peripheral blood from a group of 50 allo-HSCT patients. They found that low number of circulating DCs was not only associated with significantly increased risk of relapse and acute GVHD, but also predicative of patient death after allogeneic HSCT (110). Notably, clinical studies from 39 children with allo-HSCT indicated that while normal cDC numbers were observed by 300–400 days after transplantation, pDC numbers were always lower than those of age-matched control patients during the entire follow-up period of up to 7 years (112). In contrast, patients with high pDC recovery profile often had improved overall survival (114). Data from preclinical studies also showed a marked deficit in all lineages of DCs (CD8+ DCs, CD11b+ DCs, and pDCs) in GVHD compared with non-GVHD mice (55, 109, 116, 117). Thus, the recovery of DCs from engrafted HSPCs in allo-HSCT patients may predict the occurrence of severe GVHD and non-relapse mortality.
Donor DCs Mediate Protective Immunity
DCs are critical for eliciting T cell immune responses, protecting the host against viral infection (, , 118). Viral infection remains a major challenge for the success of allo-HSCT. Clinical studies have shown that after allo-HSCT, patients with lower numbers of circulating peripheral blood DCs often have increased risk of infections (, 110). Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a major cause of post-transplant mortality in patients subject to allo-HSCT, with ~25% of CMV-seropositive recipients developing CMV-related disease within 3 months after transplantation (119–121). It is well-established that induction of adaptive T cell immunity is critical to control CMV replication and resolve viral reactivation-mediated disease (100, 122, 123). cDCs are essential to the generation of effector T cells reactive to CMV, especially during a primary response. However, GVHD induces a profound DC defect that leads to a failure in the generation of CMV-specific CD8+ T-cells and dramatically decreased antiviral immunity (116). Collectively, improving the reconstitution of DCs following allo-HSCT may represent an effective strategy to re-establish the protective immunity in the recipient. Since pDCs produce high levels of IL-12 and IFN-α upon activation (, 124–126), improving pDC recovery after allo-HSCT may also provide efficient antiviral immunity.
GVHD Impairs the Generation of DC Progenitors
GVHD-associated inflammatory responses may influence the reconstitution of donor DCs via a complex mechanism. DCs developed from HSPCs through successive steps of lineage commitment and differentiation: HSCs → multiple potent progenitors (MPP) → common DC progenitors (CDP) → cDCs and pDCs (, 42, 125, 127–132). Inflammatory cytokines, such as TNF-α and IFN-γ, directly inhibit the proliferation of HSPCs and their generation of DCs (117). In addition, Matsushima and colleagues have shown that GVHD induced damage to the BM niche, leading to dramatically decreased hematopoiesis, including the reduction of CDP (133). However, the specific cellular component(s) within the niche that are responsible for the generation of DC progenitors have yet to be determined.
Transcriptional Regulation of DC Development
The generation of DCs is regulated by a group of functionally distinctive transcription factors (TFs). Analysis of gene-targeted mice has identified many critical TFs in DC development. Some of these TFs, such as Pu.1 and Stat3, influence the generation of all DC subsets. HSPCs lacking Pu.1 showed defective DC differentiation potential (134, 135). Targeted deletion of Stat3 impaired the generation of both cDCs and pDCs in vivo (128, 136). Thus, both Pu.1 and Stat3 are pioneer TFs in the regulation of DC commitment and differentiation from MPP (42, 128, 130).
DC subset-specifying TFs are required for committed CDP to become functionally distinct DC lineages (42, 127, 128, 130). For example, Batf3 has a non-redundant role in CD103+ cDC development and partial effect on inducing CD8α+ DCs in lymph organs (52, 92, 127). Irf8-deficient animals lack spleen-resident CD8α+ cDCs and nonlymphoid tissue CD103+ cDCs (42, 127, 137). Other TFs, such as Irf4, Klf4, Notch2, and Relb, also play important roles in the regulation of other types of cDCs localized in different tissues (94, 138). Among them, Irf4 is required for cDCs to prime CD4+ T cells and promote Th17 differentiation in both the lung and intestine (60, 139). In addition, several TFs, such as Tcf4, Irf8, and Spib, are known to regulate pDC differentiation (140–142). The absence of Tcf4 leads to the loss of pDCs in mice (142).
There are limited number of studies investigating how GVH reactions influence the expression and function of these TFs required for DC development. Notably, a recent study revealed that inflammation cascades in GVH reaction favor the development of CD103+D11b− DCs in the GI tract (42), which require the presence of functional Irf4 (93). These data indicate that distinct TFs in DCs and their progenitors may have different susceptibility to the regulatory effect of inflammatory environments. This may result in a skewed expression and activation of transcriptional programs, promoting the generation of specific subset(s) of DCs and feed-forward action on alloreactive T cell responses during the GVHD progression. Delineating the mechanisms underlying this dysregulated donor DC reconstitution during GVH reaction will be important for understanding the pathophysiology of GVHD and the development of effective treatments for the disease.
DC Modulation of Alloimmunity
Manipulation of DC precursors in the HSPC graft may facilitate the establishment of a balance between GVHD and GVL effects (, , , 34, 35, 56). Preclinical studies have shown that transfer of donor pre-pDCs derived from donor mice treated with Flt3L induced markedly augmented GVL activity of donor T cells without aggravating GVHD (56). These donor pre-pDCs persisted long in that they expanded in vivo for 2 weeks after transplantation (56). These findings perfectly supported the clinical value of donor DCs in modulating alloimmunity to improve the efficacy and safety of allo-HSCT.
Use of Tolerogenic DCs to Reduce GVHD
The capacity of DCs to induce tolerance has led to numerous therapeutic studies using these cells in an effort to control harmful immune responses in models of allograft rejection, GVHD and autoimmune disorders (, , 34, 36, 37, 62, 87, 143). While transfer of immature CCR9+ pDCs reduced GVHD, transfer of mature donor pDCs did not as expected (144). Furthermore, transfer of highly purified immature pDCs derived from donors was technically challenging and typically required in vivo expansion step to generate the number enough for modulating GVH reaction in vivo (53, 56, 144).
With this technical bottle neck, many studies had to assess the therapeutic effect of ex-vivo-generated DCs. Tolerogenic DCs were tried to be generated through propagating human monocytes in vitro in the presence of various agents, such as IL-10, Vitamin D3, and immunosuppressive drugs (e.g., dexamethasone and rapamycin) (34, 36, 37, 87, 143). Yet, none of the approaches generated the best clinically applicable DCs with the expected tolerogenic capacity to modulate alloreactive T cells (34, 36, 37, 87, 143). Reddy and colleagues report that upon pre-treatment with the HDAC inhibitor SAHA, these moDCs produced high levels of IDO and promoted Treg expansion and function in vivo, leading to attenuated GVHD in mice (54). These findings indicate that targeting epigenetic regulators in DCs may prove to be an effective strategy to induce the generation of DCs with tolerogenic properties for reducing GVHD.
DC Induction of GVL Effects After Allo-HSCT
Emerging evidence indicated that DCs were required for optimal GVL response without aggravating GVHD. Reddy and colleagues report that as compared to allogeneic wild-type (WT) hosts, allogeneic Batf3-deficient recipient mice developed severe GVHD but with significantly reduced GVL response (52). This indicates the importance of CD8α+ DCs in GVL response. Indeed, co-transfer of WT host-type spleen DCs (which contain CD8α+ DCs) and T cells into allogeneic B2m−/− recipients, which are functionally deficient in antigen presentation, induced a significant CD8+ T cell-mediated GVL response, leading to prolonged survival of recipients without tumor. In contrast, all of the B2m−/− mice receiving Batf3−/− spleen DCs, which lack CD8α+ DCs (92), died from tumor despite the presence of other DC subsets (52). This confirms the crucial role of CD8α+ DCs in eliciting anti-tumor immunity. However, these experiments did not examine the direct effect of CD8α+ DCs on T cell-mediated GVL response.
In human recipients of unrelated donor BM grafts, but not granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)-mobilized peripheral blood grafts, a higher number of donor pDCs is associated with increased survival and reduced GVHD (145). Data from experimental studies indicate that transfer of pDC-enriched BM grafts preserved GVL effects without aggravating GVHD in mice (56, 146). pDCs produce high levels of IFN-α and IL-12 (147, 148), cytokines important to promote differentiation and expansion of antigen-specific effector cells (149). In these studies, Waller and colleagues have demonstrated that in vivo administration of Flt3L to donor mice induced 5-fold increase in pDC content without significant changes in the number of HSCs, T cells and B cells. Most importantly, transfer of pDC-enriched BM graft from Flt3L-treated donors decreased GVHD while retaining GVL effects in allogeneic recipient mice (146).
We have recently established a novel platform to produce Dll4+ DCs from murine BM using Flt3L and TLR agonists (64). Upon allogeneic Dll4+ DC stimulation, CD4+ naïve T cells underwent effector differentiation and produced high levels of IFN-γ and IL-17 in vitro, depending on Dll4 activation of Notch signaling. Adoptive transfer of these Dll4+ DC-induced T cells eliminated leukemic cells without causing severe GVHD, leading to significantly improved survival of leukemic mice undergoing allo-HSCT. This strategy may potentially improve the anti-leukemic response after HSCT and overcome some barriers to the GVL response such as high disease burden and pharmacologic immunosuppression (64). Since DC activation of naïve T cells allows them to be primed with antigens, Dll4+ DCs loaded with leukemia-associated antigens may facilitate the selective expansion of leukemic cell-reactive T cells and specifically boost the anti-leukemia activity.
Conclusion
While traditional therapies have been targeting T cells, extensive research in murine HSCT models convincingly showed the ability of DCs to preserve GVL response without aggravating GVHD. Targeting donor DCs in vivo or ex vivo may potentially subvert alloreactive T cell responses and reduce GVHD (53). Given the role of DCs in maintaining Treg after allo-HSCT (56, 109), co-transfer of tolerogenic DCs and Treg could be more effective on reducing GVH reactions in vivo. A randomized Phase I study has shown the safety of infusing the host tolerogenic DCs into diabetes patients (150). It will be interesting to test whether these ex vivo generated tolerogenic DCs given in the peri-transplant period may prevent GVHD while preserving GVL effects.
One major challenge is to produce large number of donor-type tolerogenic DCs that can persist sufficient time to execute their function following adoptive transfer to modulate alloimmunity. We propose that donor-type DCs have several advantages compared to host-type DCs. For example, donors are healthy, and their hematopoietic system is not compromised by accompanied disease state and treatment conditions. Furthermore, available data from both clinical and pre-clinical studies suggest that donor-derived pDCs have potent capability to modulate GVH reactions (55, 56, 145, 146). These data provide a proof of concept that in vivo administration of pDCs is promising for enhancing GVL response without causing severe GVHD.
Most recent studies have shown that the fate of pDCs is determined early at the stage of HSCs (127, 130, 136, 151–153). This suggests that induction of tolerogenic DCs should start from the HSPC stage. Better understanding how the fate of tolerogenic DCs are determined and regulated may have significant implication in the production of DCs for efficiently modulating alloimmunity.
Statements
Author contributions
HY, YT, YW, SM, and YZ collected all materials for reviewing and wrote the review.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by Department of Defense (YZ) and NIH (CA172106-01, YZ, HL127351-01A1, YZ).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1.
ZeiserRBlazarBR. Acute graft-versus-host disease - biologic process, prevention, and therapy. N Engl J Med. (2017) 377:2167–79. 10.1056/NEJMra1609337
2.
ChoiSWReddyP. Current and emerging strategies for the prevention of graft-versus-host disease. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. (2014) 11:536–47. 10.1038/nrclinonc.2014.102
3.
DickinsonAMNordenJLiSHromadnikovaISchmidCSchmetzerHet al. Graft-versus-leukemia effect following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for leukemia. Front Immunol. (2017) 8:496. 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00496
4.
KolbHJSchmidCBarrettAJSchendelDJ. Graft-versus-leukemia reactions in allogeneic chimeras. Blood (2004) 103:767–776. 10.1182/blood-2003-02-0342
5.
WuCJRitzJ. Induction of tumor immunity following allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Adv Immunol. (2006) 90:133–73. 10.1016/S0065-2776(06)90004-2
6.
RuutuTGratwohlAde WitteTAfanasyevBApperleyJBacigalupoAet al. Prophylaxis and treatment of GVHD: EBMT-ELN working group recommendations for a standardized practice. Bone Marrow Transplant. (2014) 49:168–73. 10.1038/bmt.2013.107
7.
HamadaniMHofmeisterCCJansakBPhillipsGElderPBlumWet al. Addition of infliximab to standard acute graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis following allogeneic peripheral blood cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant J Am Soc Blood Marrow Transplant. (2008) 14:783–9. 10.1016/j.bbmt.2008.04.006
8.
BlazarBRMurphyWJAbediM. Advances in graft-versus-host disease biology and therapy. Nat Rev Immunol. (2012) 12:443–58. 10.1038/nri3212
9.
ShlomchikWD. Graft-versus-host disease. Nat Rev Immunol. (2007) 7:340–52. 10.1038/nri2000
10.
MatteCCLiuJCormierJAndersonBEAthanasiadisIJainDet al. Donor APCs are required for maximal GVHD but not for GVL. Nat Med. (2004) 10:987–92. 10.1038/nm1089
11.
ZhangYShlomchikWDJoeGLouboutinJPZhuJRiveraAet al. APCs in the liver and spleen recruit activated allogeneic CD8+ T cells to elicit hepatic graft-versus-host disease. J Immunol. (2002) 169:7111–8. 10.4049/jimmunol.169.12.7111
12.
ShlomchikWDCouzensMSTangCBMcNiffJRobertMELiuJet al. Prevention of graft versus host disease by inactivation of host antigen-presenting cells. Science (1999) 285:412–5. 10.1126/science.285.5426.412
13.
KoyamaMCheongMMarkeyKAGartlanKHKunsRDLockeKRet al. Donor colonic CD103+ dendritic cells determine the severity of acute graft-versus-host disease. J Exp Med. (2015) 212:1303–21. 10.1084/jem.20150329
14.
KoyamaMKunsRDOlverSDRaffeltNCWilsonYADonALet al. Recipient nonhematopoietic antigen-presenting cells are sufficient to induce lethal acute graft-versus-host disease. Nat Med. (2011) 18:135–42. 10.1038/nm.2597
15.
TawaraIShlomchikWDJonesAZouWNievesELiuCet al. A crucial role for host APCs in the induction of donor CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cell-mediated suppression of experimental graft-versus-host disease. J Immunol. (2010) 185:3866–72. 10.4049/jimmunol.1001625
16.
ReddyPMaedaYLiuCKrijanovskiOIKorngoldRFerraraJL. A crucial role for antigen-presenting cells and alloantigen expression in graft-versus-leukemia responses. Nat Med. (2005) 11:1244–9. 10.1038/nm1309
17.
TeshimaTOrdemannRReddyPGaginSLiuCCookeKRet al. Acute graft-versus-host disease does not require alloantigen expression on host epithelium. Nat Med. (2002) 8:575–81. 10.1038/nm0602-575
18.
SteinmanRMBanchereauJ. Taking dendritic cells into medicine. Nature (2007) 449:419–26. 10.1038/nature06175
19.
BanchereauJSteinmanRM. Dendritic cells and the control of immunity. Nature (1998) 392:245–52. 10.1038/32588
20.
ZamvilSSSteinmanL. The T lymphocyte in experimental allergic encephalomyelitis. Annu Rev Immunol. (1990) 8:579–621. 10.1146/annurev.iy.08.040190.003051
21.
NaikSH. Demystifying the development of dendritic cell subtypes, a little. Immunol Cell Biol. (2008) 86:439–52. 10.1038/icb.2008.28
22.
ShortmanKNaikSH. Steady-state and inflammatory dendritic-cell development. Nat Rev Immunol. (2007) 7:19–30. 10.1038/nri1996
23.
ReizisBColonnaMTrinchieriGBarratFGillietM. Plasmacytoid dendritic cells: one-trick ponies or workhorses of the immune system?Nat Rev Immunol. (2011) 11:558–65. 10.1038/nri3027
24.
ZunigaEIMcGavernDBPruneda-PazJLTengCOldstoneMB. Bone marrow plasmacytoid dendritic cells can differentiate into myeloid dendritic cells upon virus infection. Nat Immunol. (2004) 5:1227–34. 10.1038/ni1136
25.
SchlitzerALoschkoJMairKVogelmannRHenkelLEinwachterHet al. Identification of CCR9- murine plasmacytoid DC precursors with plasticity to differentiate into conventional DCs. Blood (2011) 117:6562–70. 10.1182/blood-2010-12-326678
26.
StriogaMMFelzmannTPowellDJJrOstapenkoVDobrovolskieneNTMatuskovaMet al. Therapeutic dendritic cell-based cancer vaccines: the state of the art. Crit Rev Immunol. (2013) 33:489–547. 10.1615/CritRevImmunol.2013008033
27.
PaluckaKBanchereauJ. Dendritic-cell-based therapeutic cancer vaccines. Immunity (2013) 39:38–48. 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.07.004
28.
CollinMMcGovernNHaniffaM. Human dendritic cell subsets. Immunology (2013) 140:22–30. 10.1111/imm.12117
29.
ColonnaMTrinchieriGLiuYJ. Plasmacytoid dendritic cells in immunity. Nat Immunol. (2004) 5:1219–26. 10.1038/ni1141
30.
BenlahrechADuraisinghamSKingDVerhagenLRozisGAmjadiPet al. Human blood CD1c dendritic cells stimulate IL-12-independent IFN-gamma responses and have a strikingly low inflammatory profile. J Leukocyte Biol. (2015) 97:873–85. 10.1189/jlb.1A0114-058RR
31.
SandyARChungJToubaiTShanGTTranITFriedmanAet al. T cell-specific notch inhibition blocks graft-versus-host disease by inducing a hyporesponsive program in alloreactive CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. J Immunol. (2013) 190:5818–28. 10.4049/jimmunol.1203452
32.
ZhangYSandyARWangJRadojcicVShanGTTranITet al. Notch signaling is a critical regulator of allogeneic CD4+ T-cell responses mediating graft-versus-host disease. Blood (2011) 117:299–308. 10.1182/blood-2010-03-271940
33.
AmsenDAntovAFlavellRA. The different faces of Notch in T-helper-cell differentiation. Nat Rev Immunol. (2009) 9:116–24. 10.1038/nri2488
34.
StengerEOTurnquistHRMaparaMYThomsonAW. Dendritic cells and regulation of graft-versus-host disease and graft-versus-leukemia activity. Blood (2012) 119:5088–103. 10.1182/blood-2011-11-364091
35.
MacDonaldKPShlomchikWDReddyP. Biology of graft-versus-host responses: recent insights. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant J Am Soc Blood Marrow Transplant. (2013) 19:S10–14. 10.1016/j.bbmt.2012.11.005
36.
AudigerCRahmanMJYunTJTarbellKVLesageS. The importance of dendritic cells in maintaining immune tolerance. J Immunol. (2017) 198:2223–31. 10.4049/jimmunol.1601629
37.
DeviKSAnandasabapathyN. The origin of DCs and capacity for immunologic tolerance in central and peripheral tissues. Semin Immunopathol. (2017) 39:137–52. 10.1007/s00281-016-0602-0
38.
Fugier-VivierIJRezzougFHuangYGraul-LaymanAJSchanieCLXuHet al. Plasmacytoid precursor dendritic cells facilitate allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell engraftment. J Exp Med. (2005) 201:373–83. 10.1084/jem.20041399
39.
CardenasPAHuangYIldstadST. The role of pDC, recipient T(reg) and donor T(reg) in HSC engraftment: mechanisms of facilitation. Chimerism (2011) 2:65–70. 10.4161/chim.17588
40.
MeradMHoffmannPRanheimESlaymakerSManzMGLiraSAet al. Depletion of host Langerhans cells before transplantation of donor alloreactive T cells prevents skin graft-versus-host disease. Nat Med. (2004) 10:510–7. 10.1038/nm1038
41.
TeshimaTReddyPLowlerKPKuKurugaMALiuCCookeKRet al. Flt3 ligand therapy for recipients of allogeneic bone marrow transplants expands host CD8 alpha(+) dendritic cells and reduces experimental acute graft-versus-host disease. Blood (2002) 99:1825–32. 10.1182/blood.V99.5.1825
42.
MeradMSathePHelftJMillerJMorthaA. The dendritic cell lineage: ontogeny and function of dendritic cells and their subsets in the steady state and the inflamed setting. Annu Rev Immunol. (2013) 31:563–604. 10.1146/annurev-immunol-020711-074950
43.
MorelliAEThomsonAW. Tolerogenic dendritic cells and the quest for transplant tolerance. Nat Rev Immunol. (2007) 7:610–21. 10.1038/nri2132
44.
ChungCYYsebaertDBernemanZNCoolsN. Dendritic cells: cellular mediators for immunological tolerance. Clin Dev Immunol. (2013) 2013:972865. 10.1155/2013/972865
45.
ChakravertyRSykesM. The role of antigen-presenting cells in triggering graft-versus-host disease and graft-versus-leukemia. Blood (2007) 110:9–17. 10.1182/blood-2006-12-022038
46.
ZhangYLouboutinJPZhuJRiveraAJEmersonSG. Preterminal host dendritic cells in irradiated mice prime CD8+ T cell-mediated acute graft-versus-host disease. J Clin Invest. (2002) 109:1335–44. 10.1172/JCI0214989
47.
KoyamaMHashimotoDAoyamaKMatsuokaKKarubeKNiiroHet al. Plasmacytoid dendritic cells prime alloreactive T cells to mediate graft-versus-host disease as antigen-presenting cells. Blood (2009) 113:2088–95. 10.1182/blood-2008-07-168609
48.
LiHKaplanDHMatte-MartoneCTanHSVenkatesanSJohnsonKet al. Langerhans cells are not required for graft-versus-host disease. Blood (2011) 117:697–707. 10.1182/blood-2010-07-299073
49.
MarkeyKABanovicTKunsRDOlverSDDonALRaffeltNCet al. Conventional dendritic cells are the critical donor APC presenting alloantigen after experimental bone marrow transplantation. Blood (2009) 113:5644–9. 10.1182/blood-2008-12-191833
50.
WeberMRudolphBSteinPYogevNBosmannMSchildHet al. Host-derived CD8(+) dendritic cells protect against acute graft-versus-host disease after experimental allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant J Am Soc Blood Marrow Transplant. (2014) 20:1696–704. 10.1016/j.bbmt.2014.08.005
51.
MarkeyKAKunsRDBrowneDJGartlanKHRobbRJMartinsJPet al. Flt-3L expansion of recipient CD8alpha(+) dendritic cells deletes alloreactive donor T cells and represents an alternative to posttransplant cyclophosphamide for the prevention of GVHD. Clin Cancer Res Offic J Am Assoc Cancer Res. (2018) 24:1604–16. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-2148
52.
ToubaiTSunYLukerGLiuJLukerKETawaraIet al. Host-derived CD8+ dendritic cells are required for induction of optimal graft-versus-tumor responses after experimental allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Blood (2013) 121:4231–41. 10.1182/blood-2012-05-432872
53.
HadeibaHSatoTHabtezionAOderupCPanJButcherEC. CCR9 expression defines tolerogenic plasmacytoid dendritic cells able to suppress acute graft-versus-host disease. Nat Immunol. (2008) 9:1253–60. 10.1038/ni.1658
54.
ReddyPSunYToubaiTDuran-StruuckRClouthierSGWeisigerEet al. Histone deacetylase inhibition modulates indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase-dependent DC functions and regulates experimental graft-versus-host disease in mice. J Clin Invest. (2008) 118:2562–73. 10.1172/JCI34712
55.
BanovicTMarkeyKAKunsRDOlverSDRaffeltNCDonALet al. Graft-versus-host disease prevents the maturation of plasmacytoid dendritic cells. J Immunol. (2009) 182:912–20. 10.4049/jimmunol.182.2.912
56.
LuYGiverCRSharmaALiJMDarlakKAOwensLMet al. IFN-gamma and indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase signaling between donor dendritic cells and T cells regulates graft versus host and graft versus leukemia activity. Blood (2012) 119:1075–85. 10.1182/blood-2010-12-322891
57.
RoweVBanovicTMacDonaldKPKunsRDonALMorrisESet al. Host B cells produce IL-10 following TBI and attenuate acute GVHD after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Blood (2006) 108:2485–92. 10.1182/blood-2006-04-016063
58.
HaniffaMGinhouxFWangXNBigleyVAbelMDimmickIet al. Differential rates of replacement of human dermal dendritic cells and macrophages during hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. J Exp Med. (2009) 206:371–85. 10.1084/jem.20081633
59.
JonesSCMurphyGFFriedmanTMKorngoldR. Importance of minor histocompatibility antigen expression by nonhematopoietic tissues in a CD4+ T cell-mediated graft-versus-host disease model. J Clin Invest. (2003) 112:1880–6. 10.1172/JCI19427
60.
Vander LugtBKhanAAHackneyJAAgrawalSLeschJZhouMet al. Transcriptional programming of dendritic cells for enhanced MHC class II antigen presentation. Nat Immunol. (2014) 15:161–7. 10.1038/ni.2795
61.
YaoSBuzoBFPhamDJiangLTaparowskyEJKaplanMHet al. Interferon regulatory factor 4 sustains CD8(+) T cell expansion and effector differentiation. Immunity (2013) 39:833–45. 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.10.007
62.
SteinmanRMHawigerDNussenzweigMC. Tolerogenic dendritic cells. Annu Rev Immunol. (2003) 21:685–711. 10.1146/annurev.immunol.21.120601.141040
63.
XiaSGuoZXuXYiHWangQCaoX. Hepatic microenvironment programs hematopoietic progenitor differentiation into regulatory dendritic cells, maintaining liver tolerance. Blood (2008) 112:3175–85. 10.1182/blood-2008-05-159921
64.
MochizukiKMengLMochizukiITongQHeSLiuYet al. Programming of donor T cells using allogeneic delta-like ligand 4-positive dendritic cells to reduce GVHD in mice. Blood (2016) 127:3270–80. 10.1182/blood-2015-05-644476
65.
MengLBaiZHeSMochizukiKLiuYPurusheJet al. The notch ligand DLL4 defines a capability of human dendritic cells in regulating Th1 and Th17 differentiation. J Immunol. (2016) 196:1070–80. 10.4049/jimmunol.1501310
66.
MochizukiKXieFHeSTongQLiuYMochizukiIet al. Delta-like ligand 4 identifies a previously uncharacterized population of inflammatory dendritic cells that plays important roles in eliciting allogeneic T cell responses in mice. J Immunol. (2013) 190:3772–82. 10.4049/jimmunol.1202820
67.
TingHASchallerMAde Almeida NagataDERaskyAJMaillardIPLukacsNW. Notch ligand delta-like 4 promotes regulatory T cell identity in pulmonary viral infection. J Immunol. (2017) 198:1492–502. 10.4049/jimmunol.1601654
68.
TranITSandyARCarulliAJEbensCChungJShanGTet al. Blockade of individual Notch ligands and receptors controls graft-versus-host disease. J Clin Invest. (2013) 123:1590–604. 10.1172/JCI65477
69.
ChungJEbensCLPerkeyERadojcicVKochUScarpellinoLet al. Fibroblastic niches prime T cell alloimmunity through Delta-like Notch ligands. J Clin Invest. (2017) 127:1574–88. 10.1172/JCI89535
70.
IwasakiAMedzhitovR. Regulation of adaptive immunity by the innate immune system. Science (2010) 327:291–5. 10.1126/science.1183021
71.
JanewayC. Immunogenicity signals 1,2,3 …and 0. Immunol Today (1989) 10:283–6. 10.1016/0167-5699(89)90081-9
72.
KrishnaswamyJKChuTEisenbarthSC. Beyond pattern recognition: NOD-like receptors in dendritic cells. Trends Immunol. (2013) 34:224–33. 10.1016/j.it.2012.12.003
73.
SeongSYMatzingerP. Hydrophobicity: an ancient damage-associated molecular pattern that initiates innate immune responses. Nat Rev Immunol. (2004) 4:469–78. 10.1038/nri1372
74.
AkiraSUematsuSTakeuchiO. Pathogen recognition and innate immunity. Cell (2006) 124:783–801. 10.1016/j.cell.2006.02.015
75.
KonoHRockKL. How dying cells alert the immune system to danger. Nat Rev Immunol. (2008) 8:279–89. 10.1038/nri2215
76.
FerraraJLLevineJEReddyPHollerE. Graft-versus-host disease. Lancet (2009) 373:1550–61. 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60237-3
77.
WilhelmKGanesanJMullerTDurrCGrimmMBeilhackAet al. Graft-versus-host disease is enhanced by extracellular ATP activating P2X7R. Nat Med. (2010) 16:1434–8. 10.1038/nm.2242
78.
JankovicDGanesanJBscheiderMStickelNWeberFCGuardaGet al. The Nlrp3 inflammasome regulates acute graft-versus-host disease. J Exp Med. (2013) 210:1899–910. 10.1084/jem.20130084
79.
AmsenDBlanderJMLeeGRTanigakiKHonjoTFlavellRA. Instruction of distinct CD4 T helper cell fates by different notch ligands on antigen-presenting cells. Cell (2004) 117:515–26. 10.1016/S0092-8674(04)00451-9
80.
MukherjeeSSchallerMANeupaneRKunkelSLLukacsNW. Regulation of T cell activation by Notch ligand, DLL4, promotes IL-17 production and Rorc activation. J Immunol. (2009) 182:7381–8. 10.4049/jimmunol.0804322
81.
YamaguchiEChibaSKumanoKKunisatoATakahashiTTakahashiTet al. Expression of Notch ligands, Jagged1:2 and Delta1 in antigen presenting cells in mice. Immunol Lett. (2002) 81:59–64. 10.1016/S0165-2478(01)00326-1
82.
TanAMChenHCPochardPEisenbarthSCHerrickCABottomlyHK. TLR4 signaling in stromal cells is critical for the initiation of allergic Th2 responses to inhaled antigen. J Immunol. (2010) 184:3535–44. 10.4049/jimmunol.0900340
83.
NapolitaniGRinaldiABertoniFSallustoFLanzavecchiaA. Selected Toll-like receptor agonist combinations synergistically trigger a T helper type 1-polarizing program in dendritic cells. Nat Immunol. (2005) 6:769–76. 10.1038/ni1223
84.
SchallerMANeupaneRRuddBDKunkelSLKallalLELincolnPet al. Notch ligand Delta-like 4 regulates disease pathogenesis during respiratory viral infections by modulating Th2 cytokines. J Exp Med. (2007) 204:2925–34. 10.1084/jem.20070661
85.
SkokosDNussenzweigMC. CD8- DCs induce IL-12-independent Th1 differentiation through Delta 4 Notch-like ligand in response to bacterial LPS. J Exp Med. (2007) 204:1525–31. 10.1084/jem.20062305
86.
SprangerSFrankenbergerBSchendelDJ. NOD/scid IL-2Rg(null) mice: a preclinical model system to evaluate human dendritic cell-based vaccine strategies in vivo. J Transl Med. (2012) 10:30. 10.1186/1479-5876-10-30
87.
GangulyDHaakSSisirakVReizisB. The role of dendritic cells in autoimmunity. Nat Rev Immunol. (2013) 13:566–77. 10.1038/nri3477
88.
NaIKLuSXYimNLGoldbergGLTsaiJRaoUet al. The cytolytic molecules Fas ligand and TRAIL are required for murine thymic graft-versus-host disease. J Clin Invest. (2010) 120:343–56. 10.1172/JCI39395
89.
van den BrinkMRMooreEFerraraJLBurakoffSJ. Graft-versus-host-disease-associated thymic damage results in the appearance of T cell clones with anti-host reactivity. Transplantation (2000) 69:446–9. 10.1097/00007890-200002150-00026
90.
ZhangYHexnerEFrankDEmersonSG. CD4+ T cells generated de novo from donor hemopoietic stem cells mediate the evolution from acute to chronic graft-versus-host disease. J Immunol. (2007) 179:3305–14. 10.4049/jimmunol.179.5.3305
91.
TeshimaTReddyPLiuCWilliamsDCookeKRFerraraJL. Impaired thymic negative selection causes autoimmune graft-versus-host disease. Blood (2003) 102:429–35. 10.1182/blood-2003-01-0266
92.
HildnerKEdelsonBTPurthaWEDiamondMMatsushitaHKohyamaMet al. Batf3 deficiency reveals a critical role for CD8alpha+ dendritic cells in cytotoxic T cell immunity. Science (2008) 322:1097–100. 10.1126/science.1164206
93.
MurphyKM. Transcriptional control of dendritic cell development. Adv Immunol. (2013) 120:239–67. 10.1016/B978-0-12-417028-5.00009-0
94.
PriceJDTarbellKV. The role of dendritic cell subsets and innate immunity in the pathogenesis of type 1 diabetes and other autoimmune diseases. Front Immunol. (2015) 6:288. 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00288
95.
O'ConnellPJLiWWangZSpechtSMLogarAJThomsonAW. Immature and mature CD8alpha+ dendritic cells prolong the survival of vascularized heart allografts. J Immunol. (2002) 168:143–54. 10.4049/jimmunol.168.1.143
96.
ProbstHCMcCoyKOkazakiTHonjoTvan den BroekM. Resting dendritic cells induce peripheral CD8+ T cell tolerance through PD-1 and CTLA-4. Nat Immunol. (2005) 6:280–6. 10.1038/ni1165
97.
RobertCRibasAWolchokJDHodiFSHamidOKeffordRet al. Anti-programmed-death-receptor-1 treatment with pembrolizumab in ipilimumab-refractory advanced melanoma: a randomised dose-comparison cohort of a phase 1 trial. Lancet (2014) 384:1109–17. 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60958-2
98.
FranceschiniDParoliMFrancavillaVVidettaMMorroneSLabbadiaGet al. PD-L1 negatively regulates CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ Tregs by limiting STAT-5 phosphorylation in patients chronically infected with HCV. J Clin Invest. (2009) 119:551–64. 10.1172/JCI36604
99.
KeirMEButteMJFreemanGJSharpeAH. PD-1 and its ligands in tolerance and immunity. Annu Rev Immunol. (2008) 26:677–704. 10.1146/annurev.immunol.26.021607.090331
100.
WherryEJHaSJKaechSMHainingWNSarkarSKaliaVet al. Molecular signature of CD8+ T cell exhaustion during chronic viral infection. Immunity (2007) 27:670–84. 10.1016/j.immuni.2007.09.006
101.
BlazarBRCarrenoBMPanoskaltsis-MortariACarterLIwaiYYagitaHet al. Blockade of programmed death-1 engagement accelerates graft-versus-host disease lethality by an IFN-gamma-dependent mechanism. J Immunol. (2003) 171:1272–7. 10.4049/jimmunol.171.3.1272
102.
TsengSYOtsujiMGorskiKHuangXSlanskyJEPaiSIet al. B7-DC, a new dendritic cell molecule with potent costimulatory properties for T cells. J Exp Med. (2001) 193:839–46. 10.1084/jem.193.7.839
103.
VanasekTLKhorutsAZellTMuellerDL. Antagonistic roles for CTLA-4 and the mammalian target of rapamycin in the regulation of clonal anergy: enhanced cell cycle progression promotes recall antigen responsiveness. J Immunol. (2001) 167:5636–44. 10.4049/jimmunol.167.10.5636
104.
TamuraHDongHZhuGSicaGLFliesDBTamadaKet al. B7-H1 costimulation preferentially enhances CD28-independent T-helper cell function. Blood (2001) 97:1809–16. 10.1182/blood.V97.6.1809
105.
BeilhackASchulzSBakerJBeilhackGFNishimuraRBakerEMet al. Prevention of acute graft-versus-host disease by blocking T-cell entry to secondary lymphoid organs. Blood (2008) 111:2919–28. 10.1182/blood-2007-09-112789
106.
NguyenVHZeiserRDasilvaDLChangDSBeilhackAContagCHet al. In vivo dynamics of regulatory T-cell trafficking and survival predict effective strategies to control graft-versus-host disease following allogeneic transplantation. Blood (2007) 109:2649–56. 10.1182/blood-2006-08-044529
107.
EdingerMHoffmannPErmannJDragoKFathmanCGStroberSet al. CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells preserve graft-versus-tumor activity while inhibiting graft-versus-host disease after bone marrow transplantation. Nat Med. (2003) 9:1144–50. 10.1038/nm915
108.
HighfillSLRodriguezPCZhouQGoetzCAKoehnBHVeenstraRet al. Bone marrow myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) inhibit graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) via an arginase-1-dependent mechanism that is up-regulated by interleukin-13. Blood (2010) 116:5738–47. 10.1182/blood-2010-06-287839
109.
Leveque-El MouttieLKoyamaMLe TexierLMarkeyKACheongMKunsRDet al. Corruption of dendritic cell antigen presentation during acute GVHD leads to regulatory T-cell failure and chronic GVHD. Blood (2016) 128:794–804. 10.1182/blood-2015-11-680876
110.
ReddyVIturraspeJATzolasACMeier-KriescheHUScholdJWingardJR. Low dendritic cell count after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation predicts relapse, death, and acute graft-versus-host disease. Blood (2004) 103:4330–5. 10.1182/blood-2003-09-3325
111.
FearnleyDBWhyteLFCarnoutsosSACookAHHartDN. Monitoring human blood dendritic cell numbers in normal individuals and in stem cell transplantation. Blood (1999) 93:728–736.
112.
VakkilaJThomsonAWHoviLVettenrantaKSaarinen-PihkalaUM. Circulating dendritic cell subset levels after allogeneic stem cell transplantation in children correlate with time post transplant and severity of acute graft-versus-host disease. Bone Marrow Transplant. (2005) 35:501–7. 10.1038/sj.bmt.1704827
113.
MalardFMohtyM. New insight for the diagnosis of gastrointestinal acute graft-versus-host disease. Mediat Inflamm. (2014) 2014:701013. 10.1155/2014/701013
114.
MohtyMBlaiseDFaucherCBardouVJGastautJAViensPet al. Impact of plasmacytoid dendritic cells on outcome after reduced-intensity conditioning allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Leukemia (2005) 19:1–6. 10.1038/sj.leu.2403558
115.
LauJSartorMBradstockKFVuckovicSMunsterDJHartDN. Activated circulating dendritic cells after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation predict acute graft-versus-host disease. Transplantation (2007) 83:839–46. 10.1097/01.tp.0000258731.38149.61
116.
WikstromMEFlemingPKunsRDSchusterISVoigtVMillerGet al. Acute GVHD results in a severe DC defect that prevents T-cell priming and leads to fulminant cytomegalovirus disease in mice. Blood (2015) 126:1503–14. 10.1182/blood-2015-01-622837
117.
MarkeyKAKoyamaMKunsRDLineburgKEWilsonYAOlverSDet al. Immune insufficiency during GVHD is due to defective antigen presentation within dendritic cell subsets. Blood (2012) 119:5918–30. 10.1182/blood-2011-12-398164
118.
LiuYJ. IPC: professional type 1 interferon-producing cells and plasmacytoid dendritic cell precursors. Annu Rev Immunol. (2005) 23:275–306. 10.1146/annurev.immunol.23.021704.115633
119.
HakkiMRiddellSRStorekJCarterRAStevens-AyersTSudourPet al. Immune reconstitution to cytomegalovirus after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: impact of host factors, drug therapy, and subclinical reactivation. Blood (2003) 102:3060–7. 10.1182/blood-2002-11-3472
120.
BoeckhMLeisenringWRiddellSRBowdenRAHuangMLMyersonDet al. Late cytomegalovirus disease and mortality in recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplants: importance of viral load and T-cell immunity. Blood (2003) 101:407–14. 10.1182/blood-2002-03-0993
121.
SoraFAntinoriAPiccirilloNDe LucaAChiusoloPCingolaniAet al. Highly active antiretroviral therapy and allogeneic CD34(+) peripheral blood progenitor cells transplantation in an HIV/HCV coinfected patient with acute myeloid leukemia. Exp Hematol. (2002) 30:279–84. 10.1016/S0301-472X(01)00793-7
122.
WherryEJBlattmanJNAhmedR. Low CD8 T-cell proliferative potential and high viral load limit the effectiveness of therapeutic vaccination. J Virol. (2005) 79:8960–8. 10.1128/JVI.79.14.8960-8968.2005
123.
JamiesonBDAhmedR. T cell memory. Long-term persistence of virus-specific cytotoxic T cells. J Exp Med. (1989) 169:1993–2005. 10.1084/jem.169.6.1993
124.
GillietMBoonstraAPaturelCAntonenkoSXuXLTrinchieriGet al. The development of murine plasmacytoid dendritic cell precursors is differentially regulated by FLT3-ligand and granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor. J Exp Med. (2002) 195:953–8. 10.1084/jem.20020045
125.
WatowichSSLiuYJ. Mechanisms regulating dendritic cell specification and development. Immunol Rev. (2010) 238:76–92. 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2010.00949.x
126.
SwieckiMColonnaM. The multifaceted biology of plasmacytoid dendritic cells. Nat Rev Immunol. (2015) 15:471–85. 10.1038/nri3865
127.
MurphyTLGrajales-ReyesGEWuXTussiwandRBrisenoCGIwataAet al. Transcriptional control of dendritic cell development. Annu Rev Immunol. (2016) 34:93–119. 10.1146/annurev-immunol-032713-120204
128.
PaulFAmitI. Plasticity in the transcriptional and epigenetic circuits regulating dendritic cell lineage specification and function. Curr Opin Immunol. (2014) 30:1–8. 10.1016/j.coi.2014.04.004
129.
MildnerASchonheitJGiladiADavidELara-AstiasoDLorenzo-VivasEet al. Genomic characterization of murine monocytes reveals C/EBPbeta transcription factor dependence of Ly6C(-) Cells. Immunity (2017) 46:849–62e847.
130.
PaulFArkinYGiladiAJaitinDAKenigsbergEKeren-ShaulHet al. Transcriptional heterogeneity and lineage commitment in myeloid progenitors. Cell (2015) 163:1663–77. 10.1016/j.cell.2015.11.013
131.
JaitinDAKenigsbergEKeren-ShaulHElefantNPaulFZaretskyIet al. Massively parallel single-cell RNA-seq for marker-free decomposition of tissues into cell types. Science (2014) 343:776–9. 10.1126/science.1247651
132.
TianYMengLZhangY. Epigenetic regulation of dendritic cell development and function. Cancer J. (2017) 23:302–7. 10.1097/PPO.0000000000000280
133.
ShonoYUehaSWangYAbeJKurachiMMatsunoYet al. Bone marrow graft-versus-host disease: early destruction of hematopoietic niche after MHC-mismatched hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Blood (2010) 115:5401–11. 10.1182/blood-2009-11-253559
134.
AndersonKLPerkinHSurhCDVenturiniSMakiRATorbettBE. Transcription factor PU.1 is necessary for development of thymic and myeloid progenitor-derived dendritic cells. J Immunol. (2000) 164:1855–61. 10.4049/jimmunol.164.4.1855
135.
AndersonKLSmithKAConnersKMcKercherSRMakiRATorbettBE. Myeloid development is selectively disrupted in PU.1 null mice. Blood (1998) 91:3702–10.
136.
PaulFArkinYGiladiAJaitinDAKenigsbergEKeren-ShaulHet al. Transcriptional heterogeneity and lineage commitment in myeloid progenitors. Cell (2016) 164:325. 10.1016/j.cell.2015.12.046
137.
SalmonHIdoyagaJRahmanALeboeufMRemarkRJordanSet al. Expansion and activation of CD103(+) dendritic cell progenitors at the tumor site enhances tumor responses to therapeutic PD-L1 and BRAF inhibition. Immunity (2016) 44:924–38. 10.1016/j.immuni.2016.03.012
138.
PriceJDHotta-IwamuraCZhaoYBeauchampNMTarbellKV. DCIR2+ cDC2 DCs and Zbtb32 restore CD4+ T-cell tolerance and inhibit diabetes. Diabetes (2015) 64:3521–31. 10.2337/db14-1880
139.
TamuraTTailorPYamaokaKKongHJTsujimuraHO'SheaJJet al. IFN regulatory factor-4 and−8 govern dendritic cell subset development and their functional diversity. J Immunol. (2005) 174:2573–81. 10.4049/jimmunol.174.5.2573
140.
SpitsHCouwenbergFBakkerAQWeijerKUittenbogaartCH. Id2 and Id3 inhibit development of CD34(+) stem cells into predendritic cell (pre-DC)2 but not into pre-DC1. Evidence for a lymphoid origin of pre-DC2. J Exp Med. (2000) 192:1775–84. 10.1084/jem.192.12.1775
141.
GhoshHSCisseBBuninALewisKLReizisB. Continuous expression of the transcription factor e2-2 maintains the cell fate of mature plasmacytoid dendritic cells. Immunity (2010) 33:905–16. 10.1016/j.immuni.2010.11.023
142.
CisseBCatonMLLehnerMMaedaTScheuSLocksleyRet al. Transcription factor E2-2 is an essential and specific regulator of plasmacytoid dendritic cell development. Cell (2008) 135:37–48. 10.1016/j.cell.2008.09.016
143.
ThomsonAWEzzelarabMB. Regulatory dendritic cells: profiling, targeting, and therapeutic application. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. (2018) 23:538–45. 10.1097/MOT.0000000000000565
144.
MacDonaldKPRoweVFilippichCThomasRCloustonADWelplyJKet al. Donor pretreatment with progenipoietin-1 is superior to granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in preventing graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Blood (2003) 101:2033–42. 10.1182/blood-2002-05-1529
145.
WallerEKLoganBRHarrisWADevineSMPorterDLMineishiSet al. Improved survival after transplantation of more donor plasmacytoid dendritic or naive T cells from unrelated-donor marrow grafts: results from BMTCTN 0201. J Clin Oncol. (2014) 32:2365–72. 10.1200/JCO.2013.54.4577
146.
HassanMAntonovaAULiJMHosobaSRupjiMKowalskiJet al. Flt3L Treatment of bone marrow donors increases graft plasmacytoid dendritic cell content and improves allogeneic transplantation outcomes. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. (2018). 10.1016/j.bbmt.2018.11.029. [Epub ahead of print].
147.
NizzoliGKrietschJWeickASteinfelderSFacciottiFGruarinPet al. Human CD1c+ dendritic cells secrete high levels of IL-12 and potently prime cytotoxic T-cell responses. Blood (2013) 122:932–42. 10.1182/blood-2013-04-495424
148.
GillietMCaoWLiuYJ. Plasmacytoid dendritic cells: sensing nucleic acids in viral infection and autoimmune diseases. Nat Rev Immunol. (2008) 8:594–606. 10.1038/nri2358
149.
ChangJTWherryEJGoldrathAW. Molecular regulation of effector and memory T cell differentiation. Nat Immunol. (2014) 15:1104–15. 10.1038/ni.3031
150.
GiannoukakisNPhillipsBFinegoldDHarnahaJTruccoM. Phase I (safety) study of autologous tolerogenic dendritic cells in type 1 diabetic patients. Diabetes Care (2011) 34:2026–32. 10.2337/dc11-0472
151.
LeeJZhouYJMaWZhangWAljoufiALuhTet al. Lineage specification of human dendritic cells is marked by IRF8 expression in hematopoietic stem cells and multipotent progenitors. Nat Immunol. (2017) 18:877–88. 10.1038/ni.3789
152.
HelftJAnjos-AfonsoFvan der VeenAGChakravartyPBonnetDReis e SousaC. Dendritic cell lineage potential in human early hematopoietic progenitors. Cell Rep. (2017) 20:529–37. 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.06.075
153.
DoulatovSNottaFEppertKNguyenLTOhashiPSDickJE. Revised map of the human progenitor hierarchy shows the origin of macrophages and dendritic cells in early lymphoid development. Nat Immunol. (2010) 11:585–93. 10.1038/ni.1889
Summary
Keywords
graft-vs.-host, disease, dendritic cells, transcription factors, alloreactive T cells, immunostimulation, immune tolerance
Citation
Yu H, Tian Y, Wang Y, Mineishi S and Zhang Y (2019) Dendritic Cell Regulation of Graft-Vs.-Host Disease: Immunostimulation and Tolerance. Front. Immunol. 10:93. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00093
Received
06 November 2018
Accepted
14 January 2019
Published
01 February 2019
Volume
10 - 2019
Edited by
Xue-Zhong Yu, Medical University of South Carolina, United States
Reviewed by
Xuefang Cao, University of Maryland, Baltimore, United States; Tomomi Toubai, Yamagata University, Japan
Updates
Copyright
© 2019 Yu, Tian, Wang, Mineishi and Zhang.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Yi Zhang yi.zhang@temple.edu
This article was submitted to Alloimmunity and Transplantation, a section of the journal Frontiers in Immunology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.