Distinct Spatio-Temporal Dynamics of Tumor-Associated Neutrophils in Small Tumor Lesions

Abstract

Across a majority of cancer types tumor-associated neutrophils (TAN) are linked with poor prognosis. However, the underlying mechanisms, especially the intratumoral behavior of TAN, are largely unknown. Using intravital multiphoton imaging on a mouse model with neutrophil-specific fluorescence, we measured the migration of TAN in distinct compartments of solid tumor cell lesions in vivo. By longitudinally quantifying the infiltration and persistence of TAN into growing tumors in the same animals, we observed cells that either populated the peripheral stromal zone of the tumor (peritumoral TAN) or infiltrated into the tumor core (intratumoral TAN). Intratumoral TAN showed prolonged tumor-associated persistence and reduced motility compared to peritumoral TAN, whose velocity increased with tumor progression. Selective pharmacological blockade of CXCR2 receptors using AZD5069 profoundly inhibited recruitment of TAN into peritumoral regions, while intratumoral infiltration was only transiently attenuated and rebounded at later time points. Our findings unravel distinct spatial dynamics of TAN that are partially and differentially regulated via the CXCR2 signaling pathway.

Introduction

During the last decade, a high intratumoral frequency of tumor-associated neutrophils (TAN) was established as a strong predictor of poor clinical outcome in the majority of solid tumor entities (1–3). In fact, in a recent transcriptomic analysis of ~18.000 human tumor samples from 14 solid tumors neutrophils (secondary to mast cells) showed the strongest correlation with adverse cancer outcomes (1).

Despite this well-established prognostic role in the clinical setting, the mechanisms underlying a disease-promoting activity of neutrophils are still poorly understood. Murine studies have identified a variety of neutrophil-mediated pro-tumorigenic factors (4). Production of neutrophil-derived matrix metalloproteinases like MMP-9 were shown to release VEGF-A from the extracellular matrix (ECM) and thereby constitute a major source of pro-angiogenic factors in the tumor microenvironment (5–8). In addition, neutrophils can influence invasiveness and metastatic potential of tumor cells by angiotropism (9) or neutrophil granule-derived enzymes, that actively remodel the ECM and mutually activate tumoral proteases to promote the invasion of tumor cells (10). Priming of lung pre-metastatic niches through neutrophil MMPs enhanced the metastatic spread of mammary tumors (11). Likewise, human neutrophils, after CXCR2-dependent recruitment (12), and MAPK activation have the ability to induce multiple tumor promoting mechanisms (6), which includes the cortactin-mediated induction of tumor cell invasion and metastasis in patients (13). Further, immunosuppressive neutrophils with myeloid-derived suppressor cell activity (PMN-MDSC) can drive tumor immune evasion (14–16).

Despite this important role of neutrophils in malignant disease, until recently, even in murine models, mechanistic studies on the recruitment and intratumoral biology of TAN were limited to histological tissue analyses, ex vivo investigations or depletion of neutrophils by antibodies without a direct observation of the live cells within the tumor. To a large extent, this has been based on existing models such as lys-EGFP, c-fms-EGFP, and hMRP8-Cre that were not neutrophil specific and hence also included the analysis of “contaminating” cells from the myelomonocytic and dendritic lineages (17–19). As such, immune-mediated mechanisms of neutrophil recruitment to the sites of tumor are incompletely understood.

Experimental murine studies and clinical correlation analyses have identified ligands for CXCR2 as major drivers of TAN recruitment into tumor lesions, involving CXCL1/KC, CXCL2/MIP-2, CXCL5/LIX, CXCL6, and MIF (12, 20–23). Consequently, at least in murine models, many of the disease-promoting effects of neutrophils can be attenuated by CXCR2 blockade (24–26). In contrast to human neutrophils, where CXCR1 and CXCR2/IL-8 interaction is a major chemoattractant (27), in mice, CXCR1 has a redundant capacity for neutrophil trafficking whilst playing a predominant role in regulating degranulation (28). Neutrophil effector functions and trafficking to tissues are also context-dependent. While neutrophils were initially considered as purely pathogen-clearing innate effector cells, to date, complex and adaptable functions in infection, inflammation and cancer are emerging (29, 30).

In this study, we used AZD5069 to modulate recruitment of TAN into tumor lesions in vivo. AZD5069 is a small molecule antagonist with over 100-fold selectivity for CXCR2 relative to CXCR1 receptor, that does not adversely affect neutrophil-mediated host immunity (31, 32). Beyond a potential immuno-oncological target (20), AZD5069 has been extensively studied as an orally active immunotherapy in chronic respiratory diseases, including COPD (33, 34), bronchiectasis (35) and severe asthma (36, 37). In murine tumor models CXCR2 blockade has been shown to modulate neutrophil trafficking to sites of chronic inflammation, subsequently reduced tumor and metastasis formation and enhanced treatment efficacy in distinct therapeutic conditions (38–41).

To directly image different phases of neutrophil invasion into locally growing tumors, we used a recently established mouse model, termed Catchup (42). This allowed us to uncover time-dependent changes in frequency, localization, and migratory patterns of neutrophils in small tumor lesions. We found that neutrophils localized in either intratumoral or peritumoral regions revealed distinct migratory patterns. Surprisingly, blockade of the CXCR2 chemokine receptors, previously believed to selectively inhibit migration of neutrophils into tumors and other inflammatory tissue lesions, was shown to markedly attenuate peritumoral stromal TAN, whilst only transiently blocking the recruitment of TAN into the early tumor cell lesion. These findings have important implications for the precision targeting of TAN in emerging cancer combination immunotherapies.

Materials and Methods

Animals

All animal experiments were performed in accordance with the animal ethics committee of the state of North Rhine–Westphalia, Germany, and German guidelines for experimental animal welfare. Generation of Catchup^IVM−red was previously described (42). Catchup^IVM−red mice were bred in the animal facility of the Centre for Medical Biotechnology of the University Duisburg Essen and housed under specific pathogen-free conditions in individually ventilated cage racks. Both male and female Catchup^IVM−red mice were used at any age between 3 and 6 month, but animals were sex- and age-matched in each experiment as much as possible.

Tumor Cell Culture

The murine oropharyngeal cell line MOPC (C57BL/6-derived, HPV16 E6/E7⁻) was kindly provided by J. Lee (Sanford Research/University of South Dakota, Sioux Falls, SD, USA) and cultured as described previously (43). MOPC^EGFP cells were generated by lentiviral gene transfer using a pCL6IEGwo empty vector (44) as previously described (45). Cells were washed twice in phosphate buffer saline (PBS) before injection into mouse dermis under sterile conditions.

Tumor Model

Syngeneic murine HNSCC line MOPC^EGFP were injected superficially in the dermis of the outer dorsal ear for intravital microscopy. Approximately 3 min before tumor cell injection the ear was depilated using commercially available depilatory cream, applied <2 min. Under Ketamin/Xylazin (100/20 mg/kg body weight) anesthesia ~10 μl of 20^*10⁶/ml cell suspension in PBS was injected into the ear dermis using a 30-gauge cannula.

Contralateral Day 3 Tumor

In one experiment, on day 3 after tumor cell inoculation, AZD5069 and vehicle-treated Catchup^IVM−red mice were injected with a second tumor into the contralateral outer ear dermis. Tumor injection and CXCR2 blockade was performed as described below.

CXCR2 Antagonism

CXCR2 was blocked with small molecule antagonist AZD5069, which was provided by AstraZeneca. AZD5069 was diluted in vehicle solution consisting of 1.14% w/w HP-β-cyclodextrin and 0.5% Hydroxy propyl methyl cellulose (HPMC 6 cps) in 0.1 mM Carbonate buffer (pH 9.5–10). One-hundred microliter of 10 mM AZD5069 or vehicle solution only (for control group) was continuously administered twice daily (12 h interval) via oral gavage starting 12 h before tumor cell injection.

Intravital 2-Photon Microscopy

Imaging of MOPC^EGFP tumors in the outer dermis of the dorsal ear was performed non-invasively on costume build water heated aluminum stage. The ear was gently mounted on pre-warmed aluminum block using Vaseline, covered with a cover slip and encumbered with a 1 cm diameter metal ring. PBS was used as immersion medium beneath and above cover slip sealed with Vaseline to prevent drain. Long term anesthesia was controlled via intubation narcosis and mechanical ventilation (1.5% Isoflurane in O₂) using capnography to maintain physiologic ventilation (expiratory CO₂: ~20 mmHg). Mice were injected with 10 μL of a 1 mM QTracker® 655 (Life Technologies, Darmstadt, Germany) solution i.v. to visualize blood vessels before constant observation in a Leica TCS SP8 MP microscope (Leica Microsystems, Mannheim, Germany) with simultaneous detection via hybrid-reflected light detectors and photomultiplier tubes with a HCX IRAPO L253/0.95 water objective. If not otherwise indicated excitation was performed at 960 nm using a Coherent Chameleon Vision II Ti:Saph-Laser (Coherent LaserSystems, Göttingen, Germany). The following filter settings were used: collagen (second harmonic generation, SHG) BP485/30; neutrophils (tdTomato transgene) BP585/50, blood vessels (QTracker®) BP660/30, tumor cells (EGFP) BP525/50. Raw data were reconstructed with Imaris (Bitplane, Zurich, Switzerland) for quantitative analysis and generation of representative pictures and videos.

Statistical Analysis

Data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism Software (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA). Statistical significance was assessed with paired or unpaired two-tailed t-test for the comparison of two groups and two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post-tests for the comparison of multiple groups if not otherwise indicated. Results were considered statistically significant at p ≤ 0.05.

Results

Establishment of a Longitudinal Intravital Imaging System to Monitor TAN Mobility and Migration During Early Engraftment of Tumor Cells

At first, we established technical requirements crucial for high quality, unperturbed, longitudinal imaging of TAN in early tumor cell lesions. Maintaining body temperature is important for preserving normal physiology of mice during prolonged and longitudinal imaging. Common heating pads are unsuitable for this purpose, since periodical heating leads to relevant material expansion and contraction with enormous shifts in z-direction. To circumvent this problem, we designed a water heated aluminum stage with an external heating unit, which was constantly perfused with 36°C warm water. After narcosis, depilation of the ear, tumor cell injection and i.v. blood labeling the mouse ear was gently mounted with petroleum jelly (Vaseline®) in prone position on pre-warmed aluminum block and covered with a glass cover slip. For stable long-term imaging conditions (>1 h) endotracheal intubation and controlled isoflurane narcosis (1.5% Isoflurane in 100% O₂) with constant capnometry (FetCO₂ = 2–3%) proved successful. Continuous capnometry ensured appropriate ventilation, sufficient narcosis depth, tolerability and an adjusted recovery phase. For short-term imaging periods (<1 h) i.p. ketamine narcosis without endotracheal intubation was sufficient. Using these procedures intravital imaging was performed on days 0, 3, and 6 (Figure 1A).

Figure 1

To this end, following the adoptive transfer of ~150,000 cells of the HNC cell line MOPC^EGFP (45), an appropriate superficial tumor cell lesion was identified with epifluorescence and navigation through oculars. The autofluorescence of epidermal cells followed by overlay with the second harmonic generation (SHG) signal of the basal membrane during multiphoton acquisition permitted navigation through skin layers (Figure 1B). Mean size of the lesion analyzed inside the field of view increased over time from ~0.007 mm³ (day 0, 120–180 min after injection) to 0.017 mm³ (day 6) (Figure 1C). Within the tumor cell lesion, we identified TAN in two distinct regions relative to the tumor cell mass. The center of a compact tumor lesion, consisting of densely packed tumor cells, was considered intratumoral and TAN localized in this area were designated intra-TAN. The directly adjacent, SHG signal/collagen rich, area within the field of view was termed peritumoral compartment. The peritumoral compartment was defined as a maximum distance of 250 μm from the tumor margin, which was expected to be in reach of paracrine tumoral conditioning factors, but without direct tumor cell contact (Figure 1D; Supplementary Video 1). TANs in this region were termed peri-TAN. Using our model, we could routinely record longitudinal sessions of TAN imaging in single tumor lesions from day 0 (up to 3 h post tumor cell injection) until days 3 and 6 post injection (Figure 1E).

This experimental model therefore has provided a reliable method for longitudinal monitoring of unmanipulated TAN in small newly established tumor cell lesions with high resolution and in the context of two different spatial compartments of the tumor microenvironment.

Dynamics of Early Neutrophil Infiltration Into the Tumor Lesion

Due to their small size, very early tumor lesions are not readily accessible to classical histological preparation and analysis. Hence, intravital 2PM was especially suited to monitor immune cell dynamics in these very early tumor cell lesions. Supplementary Video 2 records TAN infiltration between 45 and 120 min after tumor cell injection. At 60 min post injection, high numbers of highly migratory neutrophils started to infiltrate the tumor lesion (Supplementary Video 2). This influx followed sigmoid kinetics over the first 3 h (Figure 2A) and at 3 h post injection substantial numbers of neutrophils infiltrated the tumor injection site. In order to test whether the injection procedure itself may cause accumulation and recruitment of neutrophils we monitored injections of PBS (Figure 2E). While PBS injection indeed stimulated the recruitment of a smaller number of neutrophils, this influx was clearly low-level compared to the tumor cell-induced recruitment (Figures 2B,E). In addition, neutrophils, induced by this initial mechanical stimulus, showed short persistence and almost completely disappeared from the injection site by days 3 and 6 (Figures 2C–E).

Figure 2

We next investigated numbers and migration of individual TAN. While intra-TAN were mostly in contact with the carcinoma cells themselves, peri-TAN were in contact with the surrounding normal or stromal tissue and the extracellular matrix. At 2–3 h post injection, a substantial number of neutrophils was present in both compartments. At day 3 the frequency of peri-TAN was already strongly decreased from 322 cells/0.015 mm³ (day 0) to 79 cells/0.015 mm³, with further reduction by day 6 (Figures 2B–D). In contrast, intra-TAN frequencies remained at high levels until day 3 and only decreased to lower levels by day 6 (Figures 1B, 2B–D).

We next quantified and compared the motility of TAN in these two compartments. At day 0, both intra-TAN and peri-TAN were highly migratory displaying an average velocity of 8.8 μm/min. This velocity was comparable to neutrophils recruited in response to PBS injection, suggesting that tumor cells strongly increased recruitment of neutrophils over the injection trigger as such (Figure 2B), but did not further modulate their speed (Figure 2F). We did not compare migratory properties of intra- vs. peri-TAN at day 0, since neutrophils rapidly interchanged between compartments at this early point in time, making a clear allocation impossible. Instead the comparison of velocity of intra-TAN and peri-TAN was performed starting at day 3 and then followed up for at least 10 additional days. We observed that the velocities of intra-TAN strongly decreased during tumor development and TAN in larger developed tumors (day 14 or later) displayed a rather sessile phenotype (Figures 2G–I and Supplementary Video 3). Interestingly, and in contrast to directly tumor cell-associated neutrophils, peri-TAN increased their velocity over time. By day 14, this resulted in a substantial difference in velocity of intra- vs. peritumoral TAN (Figure 2I). Next, we analyzed the directionality of TAN migration over time. At day 0 (1 to 3 h after injection) the infiltration of neutrophils into the lesion was directional (Figure 2J, directionality > 0.5). In contrast, at days 3 and 6, the overall directionality of TAN decreased over time, with peritumoral TAN constantly displaying a slightly higher directionality than intratumoral TAN (Figures 2K,L). Supplementary Video 4 supports this finding.

In conjunction, these data establish previously unknown time-dependent differences in recruitment, persistence and migratory behavior of TAN located in either the intratumoral or the peritumoral area of the tumor microenvironment.

Effect of CXCR2 Blockade on TAN Recruitment Into Tumors

We have previously shown that TAN in this MOPC tumor model express high amounts of CXCR2 on their surface (45). Expression of CXCR2 ligands in the tumor microenvironment is believed to be a major pathway of TAN recruitment in murine tumor models (20, 46–48) and even in human HNC patients (3). Given the tumor-promoting role of TAN, interference with CXCR2/CXCR2-ligand interaction, has been proposed as a means to limit the pro-tumorigenic activity of TAN. Against this background, we investigated how CXCR2 blockade would affect frequencies and migratory patterns of TAN in this model. Consistent with this idea the small molecule CXCR2 antagonist, AZD5069 effectively blocked the influx of TAN into both the intratumoral and peritumoral areas at early time points after tumor cell inoculation (left columns, 2–3h, Figures 3A,B). However, unexpectedly, intratumoral TAN rebounded by days 3 and 6 despite AZD5069 treatment. Thus, CXCR2 blockade was unable to limit the recruitment of intra-TAN to intratumoral areas at days 3 and 6 (Figure 3A, compare Figure 3D for the respective still images of videos). This inability was in contrast to the durable inhibitory effect of AZD5069 on the frequency of peri-TAN, which did not show a significant rebound (Figure 3B). In fact, in most experiments CXCR2 blockade still maintained peri-TAN density to levels below 70 cells/0.015 mm³ on days 3 and 6 (Figure 3B) while intra-TAN reached levels comparable to or even higher than control mice by day 3 and later (Figure 3A). This rebound of intra-TAN occurred despite reduced levels of circulating neutrophils in AZD5069-treated mice until day 6 (Supplementary Figure 1). To confirm that AZD5069 was still generally active at day 3, we injected a second tumor at the contralateral side at this time point (Figure 3C). In this tumor, CXCR2 blockade still effectively inhibited the immediate recruitment of TAN into the tumor lesion at 2–3 h post injection. This indicates the in vivo activity of the compound despite the inability to exclude intra-TAN from tumors injected 3 days earlier in the same animal. Strikingly, also in the secondary tumor, AZD5069 lost effects on intra-TAN 3 days post injection (Figure 3C) suggesting that this effect is mediated by a change in tumor biology rather than TAN biology. Consistent with observations in primary tumors, in most experiments CXCR2 blockade retained its inhibitory activity on the recruitment of peri-TAN by 3 days post injection also for the 2nd challenge tumor.

Figure 3

Having analyzed the effects of CXCR2 blockade on TAN densities, we then assessed the effect of CXCR2 blockade on fundamental motility parameters of TAN in both compartments. In day 0 intravital imaging showed the trafficking of neutrophils through vasculature directly adjacent to tumor cell lesions. As expected, also signs of neutrophil adhesion and rolling could be observed. Importantly, and confirming data from Figures 3A,B, the extravasation of TAN from vessels into the tumor lesion was completely abrogated by CXCR2 blockade at this time point (Supplementary Video 5). Since AZD5069 treatment completely prevented TAN recruitment to tumor lesions at the day of injection, motility was subsequently only analyzed at days 3 and 6 post injection. Interestingly, and despite its inability to reduce the recruitment of TAN to the intratumoral lesion at this time point (Figure 3A), AZD5069 still significantly reduced the motility of intra-TAN at day 3 (Figure 3E). However, at day 6 this effect of CXCR2 blockade on intra-TAN over vehicle treated animals was lost. A similar pattern of response was found for AZD5069 effects on the small numbers of peri-TAN. As depicted in Figure 3F, AZD5069 reduced the velocity of peri-TAN only at day 3 and not at day 6. Instead, the small number of peri-TAN, which infiltrated the tumors in the presence of CXCR2 blockade at day 6, seemed to display substantial mobility with a mean velocity above 5 μm/min (Figure 3F). In summary, the effects of CXCR2 blockade on the migration demonstrated clear differences between intra- and peri-TAN. In contrast, we observed a coherent effect of CXCR2 blockade on the directionality of TAN migration in both compartments. Here, AZD5069 treatment equally increased the directionality of TAN migration in both compartments (Figures 3G,H).

These data show, that, in addition to its distinct inhibitory effects on intra- and peri-TAN recruitment, AZD5069 also affects the intratumoral motility and directionality of these TAN subtypes in small tumor lesions.

Discussion

In this study, we demonstrate the establishment of an experimental system of unperturbed longitudinal tumor-associated neutrophil (TAN) observation in the living mouse. To this end, we used a tumor cell injection model in the murine ear dermis. While this model has many advantages in terms of the imaging technology, it also has apparent limitations. Notably, injection models, particularly with respect to early growth phases do not fully recapitulate the complex multi-component tumor-stroma available in selected chemically induced or transgenic models. Despite these limitations, syngeneic transplantation models are very frequently used for experimental research and important aspects of immuno-oncology are being investigated in such models (45, 47, 49, 50). In terms of in vivo imaging, many experimental models to date require major surgical intervention to make tumor lesions accessible to imaging technologies (51, 52). This constitutes a trauma with subsequent effects on immune cell infiltration and behavior. Our model utilizes a minimally invasive procedure allowing for longitudinal long-term observations of the invasion of unperturbed TAN into a growing tumor. Although artificial disruption of tissue integrity occurs during intradermal injection in this model, the degree of damage is comparable to human tumor-associated wounds and inflammation, which are actually induced by invasive malignant progression or iatrogenic biopsies and surgery (53, 54). Our model, therefore, recapitulates certain aspects of regular tumor development in patients with cancer. In addition, we investigated the stimulus by PBS injection itself. By comparing neutrophil dynamics in PBS-only lesions with tumor cell injection, we could show that tumor cells are the major source of neutrophil attraction and exclusively induce persistence in this model. Tumor lesions showed four times greater neutrophil densities than PBS lesions. Further, the neutrophil influx in PBS lesions was transient; and resolved to background by day 3, while TAN recruitment was durable over >6 days of observation.

Interestingly, we observed the formation of densely packed areas of tumor cells within 3 h after tumor cell injection and tumor cells showed tight microscopic cell-contacts. It is tempting to speculate that the injection of tumor cells and the formation of dense tumor cell areas also influences the biology of the surrounding stromal tissue. Our intravital imaging shows effective triggering of TAN recruitment into what we designated “intratumoral” and “peritumoral” (surrounding stromal) areas. Thus, at these early time points, most likely both tumor cell-derived and stromal cell-derived factors trigger TAN recruitment (22, 23, 55). At later time points, intra-TAN showed prolonged persistence and reduced motility, consistent with in vitro observations demonstrating recruitment and delayed apoptosis of neutrophils in response to tumor-derived factors (12, 56).

Most tumors consist of tumor cell islands and surrounding parenchyma or non-malignant stroma cells. Recently, we demonstrated a differential prognostic role of stromal vs. tumoral inflammation in head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC) patients (57). Considering the emerging prognostic relevance of tumor-stroma constitution and sublocalization of immune infiltrates in solid tumors (58, 59), we especially focused on separate analyses of tumoral compartments in this study and could indeed find striking differences in TAN frequencies, motility and CXCR2-dependent regulation with regard to TAN localization.

A key finding was the reduced directionality and velocity of intra-TAN compared with peri-TAN. This reduced migratory activity of intra-TAN could be a possible reason for the persistence of high TAN densities in the intratumoral compartment beyond day 3 as opposed to the rapid decrease of peri-TAN frequencies. Additional evidence for the intratumoral persistence of intra-TAN comes from an analysis of adoptively transferred peripheral blood leukocytes from Catchup^IVM−red mice together with tumor cells into the ear dermis of C57BL/6 mice (Supplementary Figure 2). Here, we observed viable migrating adoptively transferred TAN until day 3 after transfer, suggesting that at least a certain number of intra-TAN can persist for up to 3 days in the tumor lesion. In contrast, the increased mobility of peri-TAN may lead to an increased chance of contact to distracting cues from sites away from the tumor lesion. It remains to be shown, which mechanisms are active in recruiting peri-TAN away from the tumor. Also delayed apoptosis of intra- vs. peri-TAN is a potential mechanism that might explain our findings (56, 60). New models utilizing photoactivatable GFP-transgenic neutrophils have recently been published (61) and could be used to further decipher the fate and function of intra-TAN after recruitment into the tumor core area.

CXCR2 is a major signaling pathway in neutrophil recruitment in tumors and non-malignant neutrophil-driven inflammatory diseases (34, 62–64). In a previous study, using the same MOPC cell line, we have demonstrated expression of KC and MIF by MOPC tumors (45). Interestingly, in the present study, we observed differential effects of CXCR2 blockade on TAN localized in either the intratumoral or peritumoral tissue areas. The fact that CXCR2 blockade efficiently blocked primary TAN influx on day 0 suggests a major role of the CXCR2 pathway in driving acute TAN recruitment. This is consistent with published intravital data in zebrafish larvae where neutrophil recruitment to wounds is abrogated by CXCR2 antagonists (65). However, in addition tumors may develop CXCR2 independent mechanisms of TAN recruitment which lead to stable TAN infiltration beyond day 3. Alternatively, TAN residing in specialized niches of tumors might produce factors that recruit additional TANs, as has been shown recently for HGF, that is produced by TAN and recruits additional TANs via c-Met signaling (66). Similar observations have been made for neutrophils in necrotic lesions that induce a feed-forward loop for the recruitment of other neutrophils via leukotriene B₄ (67). Future work needs to address, which mechanism is active in our model. Interestingly, in a model of zebrafish wounding additionally to the initial recruitment of neutrophils also the resolution of inflammation seemed to depend on CXCR2 (65).

The chemokine receptor CXCR2 is primarily expressed on mature neutrophils. However, in tumor hosts often an expansion of immature neutrophils occurs (45). Immature circulating neutrophils normally express low or no CXCR2. Evrard et al. recently showed that tumor bearing mice display elevated numbers of immature CD101⁻ neutrophils in blood and pancreatic tumors compared to naive mice (68). Those cells showed low surface expression of CXCR2. Interestingly, in this model CXCR2⁻ immature cells were still capable of normal tissue infiltration and interstitial migration. Hence, antagonizing CXCR2 using AZD5069 may selectively allow CXCR2⁻ immature neutrophils only to infiltrate transplanted tumors in our model. By contrast, CD101⁻ immature neutrophils only account for 1 to 5 % isolated neutrophils in blood and 5 to 16% of isolated neutrophils from pancreas in animals with low or high tumor burden, respectively (68). However, in our tumor model the numbers of intra-TAN in CXCR2-blocked Catchup^IVM−red mice even exceeded those of vehicle treated animals on day 3. In addition, using the same tumor cell line model as in this study, we recently reported that in both, naïve and tumor-bearing C57BL/6 mice, neutrophils in the blood, bone marrow and spleen consistently express considerable amounts of CXCR2 (45). The high TAN content under CXCR2 blockade occurs despite reduced systemic levels of circulating neutrophils (Supplementary Figure 1). Next to TAN-intrinsic mechanisms, it might still be possible, that the tumor changes its phenotype in a co-evolution with TAN or other infiltrating immune cells, which should be investigated in future studies. Furthermore, tumor cell triggered differential chemokine modifications in the densely packed intratumoral compartment may differ from chemokine processing and constitution in the peritumoral compartment. For neutrophil activating chemokines, it is known that their effect is modulated by post-translational changes like nitration or binding to glycosaminoglycans (69). Additionally, differential constitution in terms of extracellular matrix or extracellular proteolytic activity of both compartments may lead to differential conformational changes of the present chemokines to predominantly monomers or dimers. Since it was shown for CXCL1 that monomeric and dimeric form display differential activity in CXCR2 binding leading to a possible fine-tuning of chemokine-receptor pair effects (70), it is plausible that differential chemokine constitution in both compartments may lead to differential migratory properties of TAN.

In summary, our data represent the first targeted observation of unperturbed TAN in the living mouse during very early tumor establishment in vivo. Despite known and obvious limitations in terms of tumor cell development, our transplantable tumor model for intravital imaging reflects certain elements of human tumor cell biology and allows longitudinal tracking of spatio-temporal dynamics of unperturbed genetically labeled TAN. Clearly, our data suggest that infiltration of intratumoral lesion and peritumoral stroma are differentially regulated in terms of chemo-attractive and repulsive cues including the respective chemokine receptors and ligands involved. Interestingly, CXCR2 antagonism by AZD5069 is ineffective in preventing Ly6G⁺ cell recruitment to tumor lesions at latter timepoints. Additional studies are required to decipher the complex bi-directional cross-talk of tumor tissue and TAN responsible for this dynamic interplay. Preliminary data in our group indicate strong tumor promoting features of intratumoral TAN (data not shown). Hence, our intravital system opens the possibility to further functionally characterize these distinct classes of TAN in different tumoral compartments and thereby enables unpreceded insight into TAN biology in the living animal.

References

• 1.

  GentlesAJNewmanAMLiuCLBratmanSVFengWKimDet al. The prognostic landscape of genes and infiltrating immune cells across human cancers. Nat Med. (2015) 21:938–45. 10.1038/nm.3909

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 2.

  ShenMHuPDonskovFWangGLiuQDuJ. Tumor-associated neutrophils as a new prognostic factor in cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. (2014) 9:e98259. 10.1371/journal.pone.0098259

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 3.

  TrellakisSBruderekKDumitruCAGholamanHGuXBankfalviAet al. Polymorphonuclear granulocytes in human head and neck cancer: enhanced inflammatory activity, modulation by cancer cells and expansion in advanced disease. Int J Cancer. (2011) 129:2183–93. 10.1002/ijc.25892

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 4.

  CoffeltSBWellensteinMDde VisserKE. Neutrophils in cancer: neutral no more. Nat Rev Cancer. (2016) 16:431–46. 10.1038/nrc.2016.52

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 5.

  DeryuginaEIZajacEJuncker-JensenAKupriyanovaTAWelterLQuigleyJP. Tissue-infiltrating neutrophils constitute the major in vivo source of angiogenesis-inducing MMP-9 in the tumor microenvironment. Neoplasia. (2014) 16:771–88. 10.1016/j.neo.2014.08.013

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 6.

  DumitruCAFechnerMKHoffmannTKLangSBrandauS. A novel p38-MAPK signaling axis modulates neutrophil biology in head and neck cancer. J Leukoc Biol. (2012) 91:591–8. 10.1189/jlb.0411193

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 7.

  KuangDMZhaoQWuYPengCWangJXuZet al. Peritumoral neutrophils link inflammatory response to disease progression by fostering angiogenesis in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. (2011) 54:948–55. 10.1016/j.jhep.2010.08.041

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 8.

  NozawaHChiuCHanahanD. Infiltrating neutrophils mediate the initial angiogenic switch in a mouse model of multistage carcinogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2006) 103:12493–8. 10.1073/pnas.0601807103

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 9.

  BaldTQuastTLandsbergJRogavaMGloddeNLopez-RamosDet al. Ultraviolet-radiation-induced inflammation promotes angiotropism and metastasis in melanoma. Nature. (2014) 507:109–13. 10.1038/nature13111

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 10.

  ShamamianPSchwartzJDPocockBJMoneaSWhitingDMarcusSGet al. Activation of progelatinase A (MMP-2) by neutrophil elastase, cathepsin G, and proteinase-3: a role for inflammatory cells in tumor invasion and angiogenesis. J Cell Physiol. (2001) 189:197–206. 10.1002/jcp.10014

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 11.

  YanHHPickupMPangYGorskaAELiZChytilAet al. Gr-1+CD11b+ myeloid cells tip the balance of immune protection to tumor promotion in the premetastatic lung. Cancer Res. (2010) 70:6139–49. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-0706

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 12.

  DumitruCAGholamanHTrellakisSBruderekKDominasNGuXet al. Tumor-derived macrophage migration inhibitory factor modulates the biology of head and neck cancer cells via neutrophil activation. Int J Cancer. (2011) 129:859–69. 10.1002/ijc.25991

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 13.

  DumitruCABankfalviAGuXEberhardtWEZeidlerRLangSet al. Neutrophils activate tumoral CORTACTIN to enhance progression of orohypopharynx carcinoma. Front Immunol. (2013) 4:33. 10.3389/fimmu.2013.00033

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 14.

  BrandauSMosesKLangS. The kinship of neutrophils and granulocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells in cancer: cousins, siblings or twins?Semin Cancer Biol. (2013) 23:171–82. 10.1016/j.semcancer.2013.02.007

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 15.

  GabrilovichDIOstrand-RosenbergSBronteV. Coordinated regulation of myeloid cells by tumours. Nat Rev Immunol. (2012) 12:253–68. 10.1038/nri3175

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 16.

  LangSBruderekKKasparCHoingBKanaanODominasNet al. Clinical relevance and suppressive capacity of human myeloid-derived suppressor cell subsets. Clin Cancer Res. (2018) 24:4834–44. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-3726

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 17.

  AbramCLRobergeGLHuYLowellCA. Comparative analysis of the efficiency and specificity of myeloid-Cre deleting strains using ROSA-EYFP reporter mice. J Immunol Methods. (2014) 408:89–100. 10.1016/j.jim.2014.05.009

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 18.

  FaustNVarasFKellyLMHeckSGrafT. Insertion of enhanced green fluorescent protein into the lysozyme gene creates mice with green fluorescent granulocytes and macrophages. Blood. (2000) 96:719–26.

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • Google Scholar

• 19.

  SasmonoRTOceandyDPollardJWTongWPavliPWainwrightBJet al. A macrophage colony-stimulating factor receptor-green fluorescent protein transgene is expressed throughout the mononuclear phagocyte system of the mouse. Blood. (2003) 101:1155–63. 10.1182/blood-2002-02-0569

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 20.

  AcharyyaSOskarssonTVanharantaSMalladiSKimJMorrisPGet al. A CXCL1 paracrine network links cancer chemoresistance and metastasis. Cell. (2012) 150:165–78. 10.1016/j.cell.2012.04.042

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 21.

  JiHHoughtonAMMarianiTJPereraSKimCBPaderaRet al. K-ras activation generates an inflammatory response in lung tumors. Oncogene. (2006) 25:2105–12. 10.1038/sj.onc.1209237

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 22.

  LazennecGRichmondA. Chemokines and chemokine receptors: new insights into cancer-related inflammation. Trends Mol Med. (2010) 16:133–44. 10.1016/j.molmed.2010.01.003

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 23.

  VandercappellenJVan DammeJStruyfS. The role of CXC chemokines and their receptors in cancer. Cancer Lett. (2008) 267:226–44. 10.1016/j.canlet.2008.04.050

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 24.

  ChaoTFurthEEVonderheideRH. CXCR2-dependent accumulation of tumor-associated neutrophils regulates T-cell immunity in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Cancer Immunol Res. (2016) 4:968–82. 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-16-0188

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 25.

  HighfillSLCuiYGilesAJSmithJPZhangHMorseEet al. Disruption of CXCR2-mediated MDSC tumor trafficking enhances anti-PD1 efficacy. Sci Transl Med. (2014) 6:237–67. 10.1126/scitranslmed.3007974

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 26.

  MosesKBrandauS. Human neutrophils: their role in cancer and relation to myeloid-derived suppressor cells. Semin Immunol. (2016) 28:187–96. 10.1016/j.smim.2016.03.018

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 27.

  AulRPatelSSummerhillSKiltyIPlumbJSinghD. LPS challenge in healthy subjects: an investigation of neutrophil chemotaxis mechanisms involving CXCR1 and CXCR2. Int Immunopharmacol. (2012) 13:225–31. 10.1016/j.intimp.2012.04.008

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 28.

  SwamydasMGaoJLBreakTJJohnsonMDJaegerMRodriguezCAet al. CXCR1-mediated neutrophil degranulation and fungal killing promote Candida clearance and host survival. Sci Transl Med. (2016) 8:322ra310. 10.1126/scitranslmed.aac7718

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 29.

  LiewPXKubesP. The neutrophil's role during health and disease. Physiol Rev. (2019) 99:1223–48. 10.1152/physrev.00012.2018

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 30.

  MantovaniACassatellaMACostantiniCJaillonS. Neutrophils in the activation and regulation of innate and adaptive immunity. Nat Rev Immunol. (2011) 11:519–31. 10.1038/nri3024

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 31.

  JurcevicSHumfreyCUddinMWarringtonSLarssonBKeenC. The effect of a selective CXCR2 antagonist (AZD5069) on human blood neutrophil count and innate immune functions. Br J Clin Pharmacol. (2015) 80:1324–36. 10.1111/bcp.12724

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 32.

  UddinMBettsCRobinsonIMalmgrenAHumfreyC. The chemokine CXCR2 antagonist (AZD5069) preserves neutrophil-mediated host immunity in non-human primates. Haematologica. (2017) 102:e65–8. 10.3324/haematol.2016.152371

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 33.

  KirstenAMForsterKRadeczkyELinnhoffABalintBWatzHet al. The safety and tolerability of oral AZD5069, a selective CXCR2 antagonist, in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD. Pulm Pharmacol Ther. (2015) 31:36–41. 10.1016/j.pupt.2015.02.001

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 34.

  PedersenFWaschkiBMarwitzSGoldmannTKirstenAMalmgrenAet al. Neutrophil extracellular trap formation is regulated by CXCR2 in COPD neutrophils. Eur Respir J. (2018) 51:1700970. 10.1183/13993003.00970-2017

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 35.

  De SoyzaAPavordIElbornJSSmithDWrayHPuuMet al. A randomised, placebo-controlled study of the CXCR2 antagonist AZD5069 in bronchiectasis. Eur Respir J. (2015) 46:1021–32. 10.1183/13993003.00148-2015

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 36.

  O'ByrnePMMetevHPuuMRichterKKeenCUddinMet al. Efficacy and safety of a CXCR2 antagonist, AZD5069, in patients with uncontrolled persistent asthma: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Respir Med. (2016) 4:797–806. 10.1016/S2213-2600(16)30227-2

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 37.

  WatzHUddinMPedersenFKirstenAGoldmannTStellmacherFet al. Effects of the CXCR2 antagonist AZD5069 on lung neutrophil recruitment in asthma. Pulm Pharmacol Ther. (2017) 45:121–3. 10.1016/j.pupt.2017.05.012

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 38.

  Di MitriDTosoAChenJJSartiMPintonSJostTRet al. Tumour-infiltrating Gr-1+ myeloid cells antagonize senescence in cancer. Nature. (2014) 515:134–7. 10.1038/nature13638

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 39.

  GongLCumpianAMCaetanoMSOchoaCEDe la GarzaMMLapidDJet al. Promoting effect of neutrophils on lung tumorigenesis is mediated by CXCR2 and neutrophil elastase. Mol Cancer. (2013) 12:154. 10.1186/1476-4598-12-154

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 40.

  JamiesonTClarkeMSteeleCWSamuelMSNeumannJJungAet al. Inhibition of CXCR2 profoundly suppresses inflammation-driven and spontaneous tumorigenesis. J Clin Invest. (2012) 122:3127–44. 10.1172/JCI61067

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 41.

  SteeleCWKarimSALeachJDGBaileyPUpstill-GoddardRRishiLet al. CXCR2 inhibition profoundly suppresses metastases and augments immunotherapy in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Cancer Cell. (2016) 29:832–45. 10.1016/j.ccell.2016.04.014

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 42.

  HasenbergAHasenbergMMannLNeumannFBorkensteinLStecherMet al. Catchup: a mouse model for imaging-based tracking and modulation of neutrophil granulocytes. Nat Methods. (2015) 12:445–52. 10.1038/nmeth.3322

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 43.

  WilliamsRLeeDWElzeyBDAndersonMEHostagerBSLeeJH. Preclinical models of HPV+ and HPV- HNSCC in mice: an immune clearance of HPV+ HNSCC. Head Neck. (2009) 31:911–8. 10.1002/hed.21040

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 44.

  LeursCJansenMPollokKEHeinkeleinMSchmidtMWisslerMet al. Comparison of three retroviral vector systems for transduction of nonobese diabetic/severe combined immunodeficiency mice repopulating human CD34+ cord blood cells. Hum Gene Ther. (2003) 14:509–19. 10.1089/104303403764539305

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 45.

  MosesKKleinJCMannLKlingbergAGunzerMBrandauS. Survival of residual neutrophils and accelerated myelopoiesis limit the efficacy of antibody-mediated depletion of Ly-6G+ cells in tumor-bearing mice. J Leukoc Biol. (2016) 99:811–23. 10.1189/jlb.1HI0715-289R

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 46.

  JablonskaJWuCFAndzinskiLLeschnerSWeissS. CXCR2-mediated tumor-associated neutrophil recruitment is regulated by IFN-beta. Int J Cancer. (2014) 134:1346–58. 10.1002/ijc.28551

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 47.

  SharmaBNannuruKCVarneyMLSinghRK. Host Cxcr2-dependent regulation of mammary tumor growth and metastasis. Clin Exp Metastasis. (2015) 32:65–72. 10.1007/s10585-014-9691-0

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 48.

  SinghSVarneyMSinghRK. Host CXCR2-dependent regulation of melanoma growth, angiogenesis, and experimental lung metastasis. Cancer Res. (2009) 69:411–5. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-3378

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 49.

  FridlenderZGSunJKimSKapoorVChengGLingLet al. Polarization of Tumor-Associated Neutrophil (TAN) phenotype by TGF-?: N1 versus N2 TAN. Cancer Cell. (2009) 16:183–94. 10.1016/j.ccr.2009.06.017

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 50.

  KleinJCMosesKZelinskyyGSodySBuerJLangSet al. Combined toll-like receptor 3/7/9 deficiency on host cells results in T-cell-dependent control of tumour growth. Nat Commun. (2017) 8:14600. 10.1038/ncomms14600

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 51.

  HeadleyMBBinsANipARobertsEWLooneyMRGerardAet al. Visualization of immediate immune responses to pioneer metastatic cells in the lung. Nature. (2016) 531:513–7. 10.1038/nature16985

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 52.

  LohelaMCasbonAJOlowABonhamLBranstetterDWengNet al. Intravital imaging reveals distinct responses of depleting dynamic tumor-associated macrophage and dendritic cell subpopulations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2014) 111:E5086–95. 10.1073/pnas.1419899111

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 53.

  AntonioNBonnelykke-BehrndtzMLWardLCCollinJChristensenIJSteinicheTet al. The wound inflammatory response exacerbates growth of pre-neoplastic cells and progression to cancer. EMBO J. (2015) 34:2219–36. 10.15252/embj.201490147

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 54.

  RosowskiEEHuttenlocherA. Neutrophils, wounds, and cancer progression. Dev Cell. (2015) 34:134–6. 10.1016/j.devcel.2015.07.005

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 55.

  Del PreteASchioppaTTiberioLStabileHSozzaniS. Leukocyte trafficking in tumor microenvironment. Curr Opin Pharmacol. (2017) 35:40–7. 10.1016/j.coph.2017.05.004

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 56.

  ZhouSLZhouZJHuZQHuangXWWangZChenEBet al. Tumor-associated neutrophils recruit macrophages and T-regulatory cells to promote progression of hepatocellular carcinoma and resistance to sorafenib. Gastroenterology. (2016) 150:1646–58 e1617. 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.02.040

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 57.

  HöingBKanaanOAltenhoffPPetriRThangaveluKSchluterAet al. Stromal versus tumoral inflammation differentially contribute to metastasis and poor survival in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Oncotarget. (2018) 9:8415–26. 10.18632/oncotarget.23865

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 58.

  FengZBethmannDKapplerMBallesteros-MerinoCEckertABellRBet al. Multiparametric immune profiling in HPV- oral squamous cell cancer. JCI Insight. (2017) 2:93652. 10.1172/jci.insight.93652

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 59.

  MezheyeuskiABergslandCHBackmanMDjureinovicDSjoblomTBruunJet al. Multispectral imaging for quantitative and compartment-specific immune infiltrates reveals distinct immune profiles that classify lung cancer patients. J Pathol. (2017) 244:421–31. 10.1002/path.5026

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 60.

  AndzinskiLWuCFLienenklausSKrogerAWeissSJablonskaJ. Delayed apoptosis of tumor associated neutrophils in the absence of endogenous IFN-beta. Int J Cancer. (2015) 136:572–83. 10.1002/ijc.28957

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 61.

  WangJHossainMThanabalasuriarAGunzerMMeiningerCKubesP. Visualizing the function and fate of neutrophils in sterile injury and repair. Science. (2017) 358:111–6. 10.1126/science.aam9690

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 62.

  BoppanaNBDevarajanAGopalKBarathanMBakarSAShankarEMet al. Blockade of CXCR2 signalling: a potential therapeutic target for preventing neutrophil-mediated inflammatory diseases. Exp Biol Med. (2014) 239:509–18. 10.1177/1535370213520110

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 63.

  EashKJGreenbaumAMGopalanPKLinkDC. CXCR2 and CXCR4 antagonistically regulate neutrophil trafficking from murinebone marrow. J Clin Investig. (2010) 120:2423–31. 10.1172/JCI41649

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 64.

  WaughDJWilsonC. The interleukin-8 pathway in cancer. Clin Cancer Res. (2008) 14:6735–41. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-4843

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 65.

  PowellDTauzinSHindLEDengQBeebeDJHuttenlocherA. Chemokine signaling and the regulation of bidirectional leukocyte migration in interstitial tissues. Cell Rep. (2017) 19:1572–85. 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.04.078

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 66.

  GloddeNBaldTvan den Boorn-KonijnenbergDNakamuraKO'DonnellJSSzczepanskiSet al. Reactive neutrophil responses dependent on the receptor tyrosine kinase c-MET limit cancer immunotherapy. Immunity. (2017) 47, 789–802 e789. 10.1016/j.immuni.2017.09.012

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 67.

  LammermannTAfonsoPVAngermannBRWangJMKastenmullerWParentCAet al. Neutrophil swarms require LTB4 and integrins at sites of cell death in vivo. Nature. (2013) 498:371–5. 10.1038/nature12175

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 68.

  EvrardMKwokIWHChongSZTengKWWBechtEChenJet al. Developmental analysis of bone marrow neutrophils reveals populations specialized in expansion, trafficking, and effector functions. Immunity. (2018) 48:364–79. 10.1016/j.immuni.2018.02.002

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 69.

  ThompsonSMartinez-BurgoBSepuruKMRajarathnamKKirbyJASheerinNSet al. Regulation of chemokine function: the roles of GAG-binding and post-translational nitration. Int J Mol Sci. (2017) 18:E1692. 10.3390/ijms18081692

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 70.

  RavindranASawantKVSarmientoJNavarroJRajarathnamK. Chemokine CXCL1 dimer is a potent agonist for the CXCR2 receptor. J Biol Chem. (2013) 288:12244–52. 10.1074/jbc.M112.443762

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar