Abstract
Conjugation with the small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO) constitutes a key post-translational modification regulating the stability, activity, and subcellular localization of its target proteins. However, the vast numbers of identified SUMO substrates obscure a clear view on the function of SUMOylation in health and disease. This article presents a comprehensive review on the physiological relevance of SUMOylation by discussing how global SUMOylation levels—rather than specific protein SUMOylation—shapes the immune response. In particular, we highlight the growing body of work on SUMOylation in intestinal pathologies, because of the unique metabolic, infectious, and inflammatory challenges of this organ. Recent studies show that global SUMOylation can help restrain detrimental inflammation while maintaining immune defenses and tissue integrity. These results warrant further efforts to develop new therapeutic tools and strategies to control SUMOylation in infectious and inflammatory disorders.
Introduction
Post-translational modifications (PTMs) form a crucial layer of regulation that substantially increases the functional repertoire of the existing proteome. One critical example is small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO) modification (SUMOylation), in which SUMO is covalently, but reversibly, linked to the lysine residues of target proteins. Because SUMOylation is highly responsive to endogenous and environmental stressors and because a large number of SUMO targets are transcription factors or nuclear proteins, this PTM is increasingly recognized as a key regulator in health and disease (–). Current literature on SUMOylation remains confusing, as pathways can be SUMOylated at multiple sites with seemingly conflicting consequences for its activity. What is striking, however, is that, following cell stress, SUMOylation rapidly increases across a broad set of target proteins and effectively re-programs cellular responses. This review summarizes the emerging knowledge of how this global SUMOylation response helps maintain cellular and tissue integrity by preventing exaggerated inflammation.
The SUMO Pathway
Mammalian cells express 4 SUMO isoforms: SUMO1, SUMO2, SUMO3, and a less-studied SUMO4 [for detailed review of the SUMO pathway refer to (, )]. Whereas, SUMO1 shares about 50% homology with SUMO2 and SUMO3, these last two isoforms are typically referenced together as SUMO2/3 because their close sequence homology does not allow distinction with currently available antibodies. Extensive redundancies between the SUMO isoforms have hindered defining their specific functions, but an essential role for SUMO2 has emerged from global deletion of Sumo2, which is embryonically lethal (). By contrast, Sumo1 and Sumo3 null mice have no obvious phenotype (, ), and SUMO3 expression is significantly lower than SUMO2 in most tissues.
SUMO conjugation modulates protein activity, function, stability, subcellular localization, and interaction with other proteins. Similar to ubiquitination, SUMOylation comprises 4 enzymatic steps: The (1) maturation (through endopeptidase activity of the SUMO/sentrin specific peptidases [SENPs]), (2) activation (by forming an intermediate with the SUMO E1 activating enzyme SAE1/2), (3) conjugation (the ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme 9 [Ubc9] links SUMO to a lysine residue on the protein substrate), and (4) ligation (an optional step by which E3 ligases increase conjugation efficiency or specificity). Importantly, SUMOylation is extremely dynamic due to rapid de-SUMOylation mediated largely by the SENP family of isopeptidases (SENP1-3 and SENP5-8 in humans) ().
Notably, technical advances have allowed large-scale, system-wide SUMO proteomics analyses (, ). A comprehensive analysis of 22 SUMO proteomic studies using human cells identified more than 3,000 SUMO targets with a large portion of these being transcriptional factors and chromatin-associated proteins, linked to accessing genetic information ().
SUMOylation Connects Cell Stress to Major Inflammatory Pathways
Various works have outlined SUMOylation as an important stress response conserved through evolution (–). These studies established that SUMOylation orchestrates cellular responses to heat shock, DNA damage, and mitochondrial-, osmotic-, oxidative-, hypoxic-, and ethanol stress (–).
Inflammation is a primary response to stress. While allowing for resolving infection and removing cellular debris, exaggerated inflammation directly threatens tissue integrity. Recent studies reveal a critical role of SUMOylation in both innate and adaptive immunity and provide a link between cellular stress sensing and inflammatory responses (). However, a fundamental problem is that SUMOylation modulates often multiple and contradictory decision points within key inflammatory pathways, which leads to an inconsistent understanding of its true physiologic role. For example, NF-κB pathway activity is inhibited by SUMOylation at multiple levels, i.e., by stabilizing IκB and maintaining NF-kB repression (); by interfering with the binding of co-activator CBP (, ); by transrepression of inflammatory target genes (–); and by regulating the stability of early response gene products such as the Nuclear receptor NR4A1 (). However, SUMOylation can also stimulate NF-κB through de-repression of the negative regulators TANK () and NEMO (). As a consequence, modulating SUMOylation has yielded conflicting results regarding NF-kB activity and inflammatory outcomes. As such, the SUMO E3 ligase protein inhibitor of activated STATs (PIAS) can inhibit NF-κB activation in some models (, –), but can also activate NF-κB after genotoxic stress (). SENP2, which is particularly responsive to genotoxic stimuli, efficiently de-SUMOylates NEMO and limits NF-κB-dependent cell survival responses (, ). Correspondingly, depletion of SENP6 potentiates NF-κB-mediated induction of proinflammatory genes after endotoxin exposure in vitro and in vivo (); however, endothelial knock-out of SENP1 in aortic grafts achieves the opposite and blunts endothelial responses to TNFα or IL-1β ().
Another example of seemingly conflicting SUMOylation effects was observed in the regulation of NLRP3 activity. Here, Barry et al. () demonstrated that SUMO2/3 modification of NLRP3 at multiple lysine residues inhibits NLRP3 activation, whereas, stimulation-dependent NLRP3 de-SUMOylation through SENP6 and SENP7 promotes NLRP3 activation. However, NLRP3 modification with SUMO1 at one of these sites induces opposite results and promotes inflammasome activation and IL-1β secretion, which is reversed by de-SUMOylation with SENP3 ().
Changes in Global Sumoylation Levels Reprogram Inflammatory Responses
As outlined above, effects of SUMOylation on individual target proteins and pathways are complex and likely highly context-dependent. However, a striking observation under cell-stress conditions is the rapid net increase of SUMOylated proteins (, –). For the SUMO2/3 isoforms, this increase is readily appreciated by the detection of a high-molecular “smear”—a broad signal representing the large variety of SUMOylated proteins of different sizes—in Western blots (and the parallel decrease of un-bound SUMO2/3). A consistent body of evidence is emerging that identifies this increase of global SUMOylation as a broad-acting, adaptive response controlling inflammation. The consequences of rapid changes in cellular SUMOylation levels on inflammatory responses have not been comprehensively reviewed, and we will therefore summarize the available data produced by modifying global SUMOylation (predominantly by targeting the key E2-conjugase, Ubc9) and de-SUMOylation (by targeting different SENPs).
Global Sumoylation and the Control of Immune Cell Functions
Deque et al. demonstrated that Ubc9 null dendritic cells (DCs) responded to LPS with enhanced recruitment of RNA polymerase II to LPS-induced genes and consequently, with an exacerbated production of pro-inflammatory cytokines (). Interestingly, this work also revealed that SUMOylation repressed LPS-induction of interferon-β (IFNβ1) and thus inhibited the crosstalk between type 1 IFN and pattern recognition receptor-ligand responses. In chimeric animals that received Ubc9-null bone marrow, these findings translated into an increased susceptibility to endotoxin shock, but resistance to viral infection, indicating that global SUMOylation effectively limits inflammation-induced pathology.
This anti-inflammatory role of SUMOylation is further supported by evolving evidence from studies using pharmacologic approaches. For example, the highly selective SUMOylation inhibitor TAK981—a new drug currently investigated as an adjuvant treatment of malignancies—prevents SUMOylation by inhibiting the transfer of SUMO to the E2 conjugating enzyme Ubc9 (). In mouse bone-marrow and human peripheral blood mononuclear cell-derived DCs, TAK981 induces cell activation and maturation, triggers the production of inflammatory cytokines, and enhances priming and activation of antigen-reactive cytotoxic T cells. Notably, some of these effects were reversed by blocking interferon signaling (). Conversely, we recently found that the synthetic organoselenium compound, ebselen, increases global SUMOylation levels by inhibiting SENP2 ()—a protease with high catalytic activity for SUMO2/3 (). Interestingly, ebselen has been shown to inhibit both DC-induced cytokine production by T cells and T cell-induced cytokine production by DCs ().
Moreover, studies based on genetic modification of the SUMO pathway not only reveal the critical involvement of SUMOylation in the development and activity of lymphoid cells, mainly T cells, but also demonstrate its anti-inflammatory function. SENP1 is highly expressed at the early stages of T and B cell development and Senp1-null mice exhibit impairment specifically of T and B cell development (). However, SUMOylation also modulates T cell activation by regulating T cell receptor (TCR)-signaling. TCR induces SUMO1 conjugation to control proximal (e.g., assembly of TCR with coreceptors) (, ) and distal [e.g., activation of Nuclear factor of activated T-cells (NFAT)] () signaling events, and mutation of the SUMOylation sites impairs cell activation and Th2 differentiation in primary CD4+ T cells and T cell lines. Along these lines, emerging data suggests that SUMO inhibition of T cells isolated from chronic lymphatic leukemia (CLL) patients, shifts the T cell balance toward Th1 polarization (). Together, this could indicate that global SUMOylation is a critical determinant of the Th1/Th2 balance, which is further supported by a clear role of SUMOylation in supporting the number and functions of regulatory T cells (Treg), a specialized, inhibitory CD4+ T cell subtype. Here, pharmacologic inhibition of SUMOylation impairs Treg polarization in isolated CD4+ T cells (), and Treg-specific Ubc9 deletion impairs TCR-driven Treg proliferation and activation, and reproduces in animals the severe autoimmune phenotype seen with Foxp3 deletion (). Consistent with this, Ubc9 deletion in macrophages attenuates the M2 (anti-inflammatory) program and reduces their capacity to induce Treg differentiation ().
Studies of SUMOylation in other immune cells revealed that increased CD45 SUMOylation in Senp1-deficient mice promotes myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) immunosuppression function (). Furthermore, siRNA knock-down of either SUMO1 or Ubc9 increases reactive oxygen species production from NADPH oxidases in neutrophils, whereas SUMO1 overexpression induces the opposite effect. This suggests that SUMOylation may control the ability of neutrophils to cause tissue injury or kill pathogens (). Together, we have highlighted the diverse inflammation-regulatory effects of global SUMOylation in specific immune cell populations. To better understand how changes of global SUMOylation levels affect tissue outcomes in inflammation, we will next focus on studies that examined modulated SUMOylation levels in pre-clinical disease models.
Global Sumoylation Controls Tissue Inflammation: Lessons From the Gut as a Model Organ
Parenchymal cells react to injurious stimuli with a complex and often interrelated set of inflammatory and adaptive responses. In balancing the needs of pathogen and cell debris removal (inflammation) and preservation of cellular function under adverse conditions (adaption), control of the immune environment is essential. This holds especially true for the gut, where the intestinal epithelium forms a single barrier between trillions of bacteria and an enormous mass of immune cells harbored within the intestinal walls. Because adverse environmental conditions constantly threaten epithelial integrity (), adaptive responses are particularly well-developed in the gut (–). Indeed, the work of Demarque et al. impressively showed in inducible Ubc9-knockout mice that SUMOylation is crucial to intestinal maintenance through ensuring organized cell-renewal and differentiation, and by controlling mechanical stability of the epithelial monolayer (). Together, this highlights the intestine as a model organ to study how SUMOylation regulates inflammation in an environment particularly challenged by metabolic, inflammatory, and infectious stressors.
SUMO and Metabolic Stress
Epithelial functions generate substantial metabolic demands (63). Together with a vascular supply prone to shunting oxygen-rich blood away from the villus tip, this renders the intestinal epithelium particularly sensitive to reductions in blood flow and resultant ischemia/hypoxia (). Interestingly, we found that SUMO2/3-conjugation, while highly responsive to perfusion abnormalities (64–66), did not follow the crypt-to-villus oxygen gradient (), nor the matching expression of hypoxia-adaptive responses such as HIF-1α (67), but was restricted to villus crypt epithelia. However, intestinal ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) caused the rapid expansion of SUMO2/3 signal into villus tip epithelia establishing the stress-responsiveness of SUMO2/3 conjugation. This is an adaptive response, as demonstrated in Ubc9 transgenic animals. In these animals, increased SUMOylation had a major effect on transcriptional responses regulating inflammatory cell recruitment pathways. Consistent with the dramatic reduction of neutrophil influx and the improved preservation of intestinal architecture in Ubc9 transgenic animals after I/R, we found that pathways regulating inflammatory cell adhesion, tissue integrity and production of chemotactic factors were broadly modified in both whole tissue samples and in epithelia (). Of note, compensatory overexpression of SUMO2/3 isoform in Sumo1 null mice led to a comparable protective phenotype as observed in Ubc9 transgenic animals. Together, our data identify SUMOylation as a powerful mechanism by which the intestine controls the inflammatory environment during metabolic stress and highlights the particular importance of the SUMO2/3 isoforms in stress-adaptive, anti-inflammatory protection.
SUMO in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (IBD)
The noted prominent regulation of inflammatory responses raises the question of the role of SUMOylation in primary inflammatory diseases. Indeed, metabolic stress and dysregulated inflammation are key features of IBD (, 68) and create conditions known to strongly induce SUMO2/3 conjugation (, ). Transcriptional analysis from Ubc9 transgenic mice after I/R revealed a broad suppression of chemotactic factor expression, with many of them implicated in IBD pathogenesis [CXCL9 (69), CXCL16 (70), CCL20 (71), II17A (72), IL27 (73)]. For example, IL17A is a cytokine that can amplify inflammation by stimulating production of inflammatory mediators and thus promotes the recruitment of neutrophils and monocytes (74). IL17A has been implicated in many inflammatory diseases, including IBD (75). Singh et al. recently demonstrated that SUMOylation of ROR-γt—a key transcriptional regulator of IL17A—represses IL17A transcription (76). As a consequence, mice receiving Th17 cells expressing a SUMOylation-deficient mutant of ROR-γt in an adoptive transfer colitis model had significantly worse disease outcome measures compared to mice receiving Th17 cell expressing wild-type ROR-γt.
Surprisingly, while inflammatory processes such as rheumatoid arthritis (77–79) or I/R increase SUMOylation levels (, 65, 80), Mustfa et al. reported the downregulation of Ubc9 and, with it, decreased SUMO-conjugation levels in the gut of murine and human IBD (81). This unexpected finding needs to be further confirmed in the context of disease stages and cell populations. Nonetheless, consistent with an anti-inflammatory function of SUMOylation, RNAi- knockdown of Ubc9 in cultured human epithelial cells significantly altered inflammatory gene expression, including that of key pro-inflammatory regulators RelA, cFos, and cJun. Furthermore, the level of Ubc9 downregulation correlated in both mouse and clinical samples with disease severity and the tissue expression of inflammatory cytokines (81). Following this logic, the same group developed a nanogel DNA delivery system to induce intestinal SUMOylation by enhancing expression of the E3 ligase, PIAS1 (protein inhibitor of activated STAT1) (82). These studies together support that increasing tissue SUMOylation blunts inflammation and tissue disruption in the gut.
SUMO and Pathogen Responses
Growing evidence indicates that SUMOylation levels define the balance between destructive inflammation and effective defenses against pathogens within the gut. For example, Shigella flexneri, the etiological agent of bacterial dysentery, attacks colonic epithelia and causes massive inflammation-induced damage. Notably, mice haploinsufficient for Ubc9, display a hyper-invasive and hyper-inflammatory phenotype upon in vivo infection, emphasizing the importance of SUMOylation in the maintenance of intestinal permeability and mucosal inflammation (83). SILAC-based proteomics analysis revealed that invasive (vs. non-invasive) Shigella infection generally caused a reduction of SUMO2 modification. This affected a defined functional network of transcriptional regulators, where Shigella-induced changes in SUMOylation of regulators such as c-FOS, PPARc, and RXRa (, 84, 85) were predicted to favor inflammation.
In line with this, SUMOylation is emerging as a key modulator of multiple host-pathogen interactions, with various pathogens actively targeting SUMOylation to their advantage. As such, Listeria monocytogenes, Clostridium perfringens, and Streptococcus pneumoniae induce proteasome-independent degradation of Ubc9 through closely related virulence factors (86), while Shigella flexneri targets the E1 ligase UBE2/SAE2 via proteasomal degradation (87), and Salmonella Typhimurium targets Ubc9 via miRNA-mediated down-regulation (88). This attention given by bacterial (89), viral (90), and fungal (91) pathogens to the SUMO pathway highlights the critical role of this pathway in ensuring a balanced inflammatory response.
Perspectives
In summary, mounting evidence supports global SUMOylation as a crucial cell stress response regulating inflammation. However, the appraisal of specific connections within this SUMO interactome remains complex, as SUMOylation of multiple components within a single pathway can produce contradictory effects. While this may serve to fine-tune specific responses in certain settings, it leaves unclear what is the actual impact of SUMOylation in diseases. Using the growing body of evidence from the gut as a model organ of particular metabolic, inflammatory, and infectious challenges (Figure 1), we further establish the notion that the global increase of SUMOylation during cellular stress constitutes a coordinated response to limit inflammation and preserve cellular and tissue integrity.
Figure 1
Many aspects of this response are still unclear. First and foremost, whether global increase of SUMOylation after cell stress is the equivalent of a flooding of the system with SUMO modifications, or rather the wide-sweeping but targeted introduction of a specific set of protein modifications. In line with this question, it remains unknown how SUMOylation itself is regulated following cell stress. The speed of the response (minutes in vitro) suggests a predominantly post-translational regulation of SUMO pathway components. Indeed, hypoxia-stimulated SUMOylation was not linked to increased expression of SUMO1, SUMO2, or SUMO3 by proteome or mRNA analysis but rather to the reversible inhibition of the catalytic activity, particularly of SENP1 and SENP3 (). Yet overall, the decision points that trigger the increase of SUMOylation levels on such a grand scale remain to be determined.
Another fundamental consideration is the specific role of SUMO1 vs. SUMO2/3 in regulating inflammation during cell stress. Initial SUMO research focused on SUMO1 conjugation, yet growing evidence highlights the quick response of SUMO2/3 conjugation to cellular stressors, and the distinct roles of the SUMO isoforms. For example, NLRP3 is differentially regulated by SUMO1 vs. SUMO2/3 as discussed above (, ), while non-canonical type I interferon responses appear to be regulated by SUMO2/3, but not by SUMO1 (93). Similarly, our studies of SUMOylation in the gut also reveals that this process may play a distinct role in different cell populations (). Consequently, studies of whole tissues, particularly within complex organs such as the gut, may yield conflicting results on how SUMOylation changes and affects inflammation. These results suggest a highly nuanced SUMO regulation, and future research will need to better determine isoform-specific and cell type-specific effects. A recently developed Sumo2 conditional knockout mouse strain could be an invaluable tool (94).
Ultimately, to harness the beneficial potential of global SUMOylation, e.g., in autoimmune diseases, new pharmacologic interventions are needed. Here, oncology research has provided us with a number of specific SUMO inhibitors (95), but similar efforts are now needed to identify effective SUMO activators (). Such studies can build on the presented evidence in multiple inflammatory disorders including I/R (), IBD (82), and infectious disorders (83), which identify SUMOylation as a therapeutic target to restrain detrimental inflammation while maintaining immune defenses.
Statements
Author contributions
JK and WY developed the concept. All authors wrote and edited the final version of the manuscript.
Funding
This work was funded by American Heart Association (AHA) Grant 19IPLOI34760123, a Duke School of Medicine Health Scholar Award and a Roizen Anesthesia Research Foundation Grant from the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists (to JK) and AHA Grant 18CSA34080277 and NIH Grant NS099590 (to WY).
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Sara Galletti, PhD for editorial support.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1.
CelenABSahinU. Sumoylation on its 25th anniversary: mechanisms, pathology, and emerging concepts. FEBS J. (2020) 287:3110–40. 10.1111/febs.15319
2.
SeelerJSDejeanA. Sumo and the robustness of cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. (2017) 17:184–97. 10.1038/nrc.2016.143
3.
BernstockJDYangWYeDGShenYPluchinoSLeeYJet al. Sumoylation in brain ischemia: patterns, targets, and translational implications. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. (2018) 38:5–16. 10.1177/0271678X17742260
4.
ChangHMYehETH. Sumo: from bench to bedside. Physiol Rev. (2020) 100:1599–619. 10.1152/physrev.00025.2019
5.
WangLWansleebenCZhaoSMiaoPPaschenWYangW. Sumo2 is essential while sumo3 is dispensable for mouse embryonic development. EMBO Reports. (2014) 15:878–85. 10.15252/embr.201438534
6.
ZhangFPMikkonenLToppariJPalvimoJJThesleffIJanneOA. Sumo-1 function is dispensable in normal mouse development. Mol Cell Biol. (2008) 28:5381–90. 10.1128/MCB.00651-08
7.
HickeyCMWilsonNRHochstrasserM. Function and regulation of sumo proteases. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. (2012) 13:755–66. 10.1038/nrm3478
8.
YangWPaschenW. Sumo proteomics to decipher the sumo-modified proteome regulated by various diseases. Proteomics. (2015) 15:1181–91. 10.1002/pmic.201400298
9.
HendriksIAVertegaalAC. A comprehensive compilation of sumo proteomics. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. (2016) 17:581–95. 10.1038/nrm.2016.81
10.
ZhouWRyanJJZhouH. Global analyses of sumoylated proteins in saccharomyces cerevisiae. Induction of protein sumoylation by cellular stresses. J Biol Chem. (2004) 279:32262–8. 10.1074/jbc.M404173200
11.
AugustineRCVierstraRD. Sumoylation: re-wiring the plant nucleus during stress and development. Curr Opin Plant Biol. (2018) 45:143–54. 10.1016/j.pbi.2018.06.006
12.
EnserinkJM. Sumo and the cellular stress response. Cell Div. (2015) 10:4. 10.1186/s13008-015-0010-1
13.
RyuHYAhnSHHochstrasserM. Sumo and cellular adaptive mechanisms. Exp Mol Med. (2020) 52:931–9. 10.1038/s12276-020-0457-2
14.
HeJChengJWangT. Sumoylation-mediated response to mitochondrial stress. Int J Mol Sci. (2020) 21:5657. 10.3390/ijms21165657
15.
NiskanenEAPalvimoJJ. Chromatin sumoylation in heat stress: to protect, pause and organise? Sumo stress response on chromatin. Bioessays. (2017) 39:263. 10.1002/bies.201600263
16.
KunzKWagnerKMendlerLHolperSDehneNMullerS. Sumo signaling by hypoxic inactivation of sumo-specific isopeptidases. Cell Rep. (2016) 16:3075–86. 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.08.031
17.
AdorisioSFierabracciAMuscariILiberatiAMAyroldiEMiglioratiGet al. Sumo proteins: guardians of immune system. J Autoimmun. (2017) 84:21–8. 10.1016/j.jaut.2017.09.001
18.
DesterroJMRodriguezMSHayRT. Sumo-1 modification of ikappabalpha inhibits nf-kappab activation. Mol Cell. (1998) 2:233–9. 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80133-1
19.
JangHDYoonKShinYJKimJLeeSY. Pias3 suppresses nf-kappab-mediated transcription by interacting with the p65/rela subunit. J Biol Chem. (2004) 279:24873–80. 10.1074/jbc.M313018200
20.
LiuYBridgesRWorthamAKulesz-MartinM. Nf-kappab repression by pias3 mediated rela sumoylation. PLoS ONE. (2012) 7:e37636. 10.1371/journal.pone.0037636
21.
JenneweinCKuhnAMSchmidtMVMeilladec-JulligVvonKnethen AGonzalezFJet al. Sumoylation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma by apoptotic cells prevents lipopolysaccharide-induced ncor removal from kappab binding sites mediating transrepression of proinflammatory cytokines. J Immunol. (2008) 181:5646–52. 10.4049/jimmunol.181.8.5646
22.
HuangWGhislettiSSaijoKGandhiMAouadiMTeszGJet al. Coronin 2a mediates actin-dependent de-repression of inflammatory response genes. Nature. (2011) 470:414–8. 10.1038/nature09703
23.
GhislettiSHuangWOgawaSPascualGLinMEWillsonTMet al. Parallel sumoylation-dependent pathways mediate gene- and signal-specific transrepression by lxrs and ppargamma. Mol Cell. (2007) 25:57–70. 10.1016/j.molcel.2006.11.022
24.
PascualGFongALOgawaSGamlielALiACPerissiVet al. A sumoylation-dependent pathway mediates transrepression of inflammatory response genes by ppar-gamma. Nature. (2005) 437:759–63. 10.1038/nature03988
25.
ZhangLXieFZhangJDijkePTZhouF. Sumo-triggered ubiquitination of nr4a1 controls macrophage cell death. Cell Death Differ. (2017) 24:1530–9. 10.1038/cdd.2017.29
26.
RennerFSaulVVPagenstecherAWittwerTSchmitzML. Inducible sumo modification of tank alleviates its repression of tlr7 signalling. EMBO Rep. (2011) 12:129–35. 10.1038/embor.2010.207
27.
HuangTTWuerzberger-DavisSMWuZHMiyamotoS. Sequential modification of nemo/ikkgamma by sumo-1 and ubiquitin mediates nf-kappab activation by genotoxic stress. Cell. (2003) 115:565–76. 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00895-X
28.
XieBLiuXYangJChengJGuJXueS. Pias1 protects against myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury by stimulating ppargamma sumoylation. BMC Cell Biol. (2018) 19:24. 10.1186/s12860-018-0176-x
29.
LiuBYangRWongKAGetmanCSteinNTeitellMAet al. Negative regulation of nf-kappab signaling by pias1. Mol Cell Biol. (2005) 25:1113–23. 10.1128/MCB.25.3.1113-1123.2005
30.
ZhangJXuLGHanKJWeiXShuHB. Piasy represses trif-induced isre and nf-kappab activation but not apoptosis. FEBS Lett. (2004) 570:97–101. 10.1016/j.febslet.2004.05.081
31.
TahkSLiuBChernishofVWongKAWuHShuaiK. Control of specificity and magnitude of nf-kappa b and stat1-mediated gene activation through piasy and pias1 cooperation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2007) 104:11643–8. 10.1073/pnas.0701877104
32.
WangXJiangJLuYShiGLiuRCaoY. Tab2, an important upstream adaptor of interleukin-1 signaling pathway, is subject to sumoylation. Mol Cell Biochem. (2014) 385:69–77. 10.1007/s11010-013-1815-3
33.
MabbAMWuerzberger-DavisSMMiyamotoS. Piasy mediates nemo sumoylation and nf-kappab activation in response to genotoxic stress. Nat Cell Biol. (2006) 8:986–93. 10.1038/ncb1458
34.
ChenXLWangSFLiangXTLiangHXWangTTWuSQet al. Senp2 exerts an antitumor effect on chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells through the inhibition of the notch and nfkappab signaling pathways. Int J Oncol. (2019) 54:455–66. 10.3892/ijo.2018.4635
35.
LeeMHMabbAMGillGBYehETMiyamotoS. Nf-kappab induction of the sumo protease senp2: a negative feedback loop to attenuate cell survival response to genotoxic stress. Mol Cell. (2011) 43:180–91. 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.06.017
36.
LiuXChenWWangQLiLWangC. Negative regulation of tlr inflammatory signaling by the sumo-deconjugating enzyme senp6. PLoS Pathog. (2013) 9:e1003480. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003480
37.
QiuCWangYZhaoHQinLShiYZhuXet al. The critical role of senp1-mediated gata2 desumoylation in promoting endothelial activation in graft arteriosclerosis. Nat Commun. (2017) 8:15426. 10.1038/ncomms15426
38.
BarryRJohnSWLiccardiGTenevTJacoIChenCHet al. Sumo-mediated regulation of nlrp3 modulates inflammasome activity. Nat Commun. (2018) 9:3001. 10.1038/s41467-018-05321-2
39.
ShaoLLiuYWangWLiAWanPLiuWet al. Sumo1 sumoylates and senp3 desumoylates nlrp3 to orchestrate the inflammasome activation. FASEB J. (2020) 34:1497–515. 10.1096/fj.201901653R
40.
YangWShengHThompsonJWZhaoSWangLMiaoPet al. Small ubiquitin-like modifier 3-modified proteome regulated by brain ischemia in novel small ubiquitin-like modifier transgenic mice: putative protective proteins/pathways. Stroke. (2014) 45:1115–22. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.004315
41.
SaitohHHincheyJ. Functional heterogeneity of small ubiquitin-related protein modifiers sumo-1 versus sumo-2/3. J Biol Chem. (2000) 275:6252–8. 10.1074/jbc.275.9.6252
42.
KarhausenJBernstockJDJohnsonKRShengHXMaQShenYTet al. Ubc9 overexpression and sumo1 deficiency blunt inflammation after intestinal ischemia/reperfusion. Lab Invest. (2018) 98:799–813. 10.1038/s41374-018-0035-6
43.
DecqueAJoffreOMagalhaesJGCossecJCBlecher-GonenRLapaquettePet al. Sumoylation coordinates the repression of inflammatory and anti-viral gene-expression programs during innate sensing. Nat Immunol. (2016) 17:140–9. 10.1038/ni.3342
44.
National Cancer Institute. Sumoylation Inhibitor TAK-981. Available online at: https://www.cancer.gov/publications/dictionaries/cancer-drug/def/subasumstat (accessed February 6, 2021).
45.
KhattarMSongKGrossmanSXegaKHeXIdamakantiNet al. Tak-981: A first in class sumo inhibitor in phase 1 trials that promotes dendritic cell activation, antigen-presentation, and t cell priming [abstract]. Cancer Res. (2019) 79:Abstract nr 3252. 10.1158/1538-7445.AM2019-3252
46.
BernstockJDYeDSmithJALeeYJGesslerFAYasgarAet al. Quantitative high-throughput screening identifies cytoprotective molecules that enhance sumo conjugation via the inhibition of sumo-specific protease (senp)2. FASEB J. (2017) 32:1677–91. 10.1096/fj.201700711R
47.
MendesAVGrouCPAzevedoJEPintoMP. Evaluation of the activity and substrate specificity of the human senp family of sumo proteases. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta Mol Cell Res. (2016) 1863:139–47. 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2015.10.020
48.
MatsueHEdelbaumDShalhevetDMizumotoNYangCMummertMEet al. Generation and function of reactive oxygen species in dendritic cells during antigen presentation. J Immunol. (2003) 171:3010–8. 10.4049/jimmunol.171.6.3010
49.
VanNguyen TAngkasekwinaiPDouHLinFMLuLSChengJet al. Sumo-specific protease 1 is critical for early lymphoid development through regulation of stat5 activation. Mol Cell. (2012) 45:210–21. 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.12.026
50.
WangXDGongYChenZLGongBNXieJJZhongCQet al. Tcr-induced sumoylation of the kinase pkc-theta controls t cell synapse organization and t cell activation. Nat Immunol. (2015) 16:1195–203. 10.1038/ni.3259
51.
WangQLLiangJQGongBNXieJJYiYTLanXet al. T cell receptor (tcr)-induced plc-gamma1 sumoylation via piasxbeta and pias3 sumo e3 ligases regulates the microcluster assembly and physiological function of plc-gamma1. Front Immunol. (2019) 10:314. 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00314
52.
XiongYYiYWangYYangNRuddCELiuH. Ubc9 interacts with and sumoylates the tcr adaptor slp-76 for nfat transcription in t cells. J Immunol. (2019) 203:3023–36. 10.4049/jimmunol.1900556
53.
LamVBestSRBrussNLiuTHashiguchiRowland THuszarDet al. Pharmacologic inhibition of sumo-activating enzyme (sae) with tak-981 augments interferon signaling and regulates t cell differentiation in ex vivo studies of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (cll). Blood. (2019) 134:1760. 10.1182/blood-2019-127539
54.
DingXWangAMaXDemarqueMJinWXinHet al. Protein sumoylation is required for regulatory t cell expansion and function. Cell Rep. (2016) 16:1055–66. 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.06.056
55.
WangFSunFLuoJYueTChenLZhouHet al. Loss of ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme e2 (ubc9) in macrophages exacerbates multiple low-dose streptozotocin-induced diabetes by attenuating m2 macrophage polarization. Cell Death Dis. (2019) 10:892. 10.1038/s41419-019-2130-z
56.
HuangXZuoYWangXWuXTanHFanQet al. Sumo-specific protease 1 is critical for myeloid-derived suppressor cell development and function. Cancer Res. (2019) 79:3891–902. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-18-3497
57.
PandeyDChenFPatelAWangCYDimitropoulouCPatelVSet al. Sumo1 negatively regulates reactive oxygen species production from nadph oxidases. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. (2011) 31:1634–42. 10.1161/ATVBAHA.111.226621
58.
KarhausenJHaaseVHColganSP. Inflammatory hypoxia: role of hypoxia-inducible factor. Cell Cycle. (2005) 4:256–8. 10.4161/cc.4.2.1407
59.
KarhausenJFurutaGTTomaszewskiJEJohnsonRSColganSPHaaseVH. Epithelial hypoxia-inducible factor-1 is protective in murine experimental colitis. J Clin Invest. (2004) 114:1098–106. 10.1172/JCI200421086
60.
KaserAFlakMBTomczakMFBlumbergRS. The unfolded protein response and its role in intestinal homeostasis and inflammation. Exp Cell Res. (2011) 317:2772–9. 10.1016/j.yexcr.2011.07.008
61.
KarinMCleversH. Reparative inflammation takes charge of tissue regeneration. Nature. (2016) 529:307–15. 10.1038/nature17039
62.
DemarqueMDNacerddineKNeyret-KahnHAndrieuxADanenbergEJouvionGet al. Sumoylation by ubc9 regulates the stem cell compartment and structure and function of the intestinal epithelium in mice. Gastroenterology. (2011) 140:286–96. 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.10.002
63.
GloverLELeeJSColganSP. Oxygen metabolism and barrier regulation in the intestinal mucosa. J Clin Invest. (2016) 126:3680–8. 10.1172/JCI84429
64.
YangWShengHWarnerDSPaschenW. Transient global cerebral ischemia induces a massive increase in protein sumoylation. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. (2008) 28:269–79. 10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600523
65.
WangZWangRShengHShengSPPaschenWYangW. Transient ischemia induces massive nuclear accumulation of sumo2/3-conjugated proteins in spinal cord neurons. Spinal Cord. (2013) 51:139–43. 10.1038/sc.2012.100
66.
DatwylerALLattig-TunnemannGYangWPaschenWLeeSLDirnaglUet al. Sumo2/3 conjugation is an endogenous neuroprotective mechanism. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. (2011) 31:2152–9. 10.1038/jcbfm.2011.112
67.
GilesRHLolkemaMPSnijckersCMBelderbosMvander Groep PMansDAet al. Interplay between vhl/hif1 alpha and wnt/beta-catenin pathways during colorectal tumorigenesis. Oncogene. (2006) 25:3065–70. 10.1038/sj.onc.1209330
68.
LanisJMKaoDJAlexeevEEColganSP. Tissue metabolism and the inflammatory bowel diseases. J Mol Med (Berl). (2017) 95:905–13. 10.1007/s00109-017-1544-2
69.
SchroepfSKapplerRBrandSPrellCLohsePGlasJet al. Strong overexpression of cxcr3 axis components in childhood inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. (2010) 16:1882–90. 10.1002/ibd.21312
70.
UzaNNakaseHYamamotoSYoshinoTTakedaYUenoSet al. Sr-psox/cxcl16 plays a critical role in the progression of colonic inflammation. Gut. (2011) 60:1494–505. 10.1136/gut.2010.221879
71.
SkovdahlHKGranlundAOstvikAEBrulandTBakkeITorpSHet al. Expression of ccl20 and its corresponding receptor ccr6 is enhanced in active inflammatory bowel disease, and tlr3 mediates ccl20 expression in colonic epithelial cells. PLoS ONE. (2015) 10:e0141710. 10.1371/journal.pone.0141710
72.
IboshiYNakamuraKFukauraKIwasaTOginoHSumidaYet al. Increased il-17a/il-17f expression ratio represents the key mucosal t helper/regulatory cell-related gene signature paralleling disease activity in ulcerative colitis. J Gastroenterol. (2017) 52:315–26. 10.1007/s00535-016-1221-1
73.
AndrewsCMcLeanMHDurumSK. Interleukin-27 as a novel therapy for inflammatory bowel disease: a critical review of the literature. Inflamm Bowel Dis. (2016) 22:2255–64. 10.1097/MIB.0000000000000818
74.
AmatyaNGargAVGaffenSL. Il-17 signaling: the yin and the yang. Trends Immunol. (2017) 38:310–22. 10.1016/j.it.2017.01.006
75.
PatelDDKuchrooVK. Th17 cell pathway in human immunity: lessons from genetics and therapeutic interventions. Immunity. (2015) 43:1040–51. 10.1016/j.immuni.2015.12.003
76.
SinghAKKharePObaidAConlonKPBasrurVDePinhoRAet al. Sumoylation of ror-gammat inhibits il-17 expression and inflammation via hdac2. Nat Commun. (2018) 9:4515. 10.1038/s41467-018-06924-5
77.
LaoMZhanZLiNXuSShiMZouYet al. Role of small ubiquitin-like modifier proteins-1 (sumo-1) in regulating migration and invasion of fibroblast-like synoviocytes from patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Exp Cell Res. (2019) 375:52–61. 10.1016/j.yexcr.2018.12.011
78.
WangCXiaoYLaoMWangJXuSLiRet al. Increased sumo-activating enzyme sae1/uba2 promotes glycolysis and pathogenic behavior of rheumatoid fibroblast-like synoviocytes. JCI Insight. (2020) 5:135935. 10.1172/jci.insight.135935
79.
FrankSPetersMAWehmeyerCStrietholtSKoers-WunrauCBertrandJet al. Regulation of matrixmetalloproteinase-3 and matrixmetalloproteinase-13 by sumo-2/3 through the transcription factor nf-kappab. Ann Rheum Dis. (2013) 72:1874–81. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-202080
80.
GuoCWeiQSuYDongZ. Sumoylation occurs in acute kidney injury and plays a cytoprotective role. Biochim Biophys Acta. (2015) 1852:482–9. 10.1016/j.bbadis.2014.12.013
81.
MustfaSASinghMSuhailAMohapatraGVermaSChakravortyDet al. Sumoylation pathway alteration coupled with downregulation of sumo e2 enzyme at mucosal epithelium modulates inflammation in inflammatory bowel disease. Open Biol. (2017) 7:170024. 10.1098/rsob.170024
82.
YavvariPSVermaPMustfaSAPalSKumarSAwasthiAKet al. A nanogel based oral gene delivery system targeting sumoylation machinery to combat gut inflammation. Nanoscale. (2019) 11:4970–86. 10.1039/C8NR09599J
83.
FritahSLhocineNGolebiowskiFMounierJAndrieuxAJouvionGet al. Sumoylation controls host anti-bacterial response to the gut invasive pathogen shigella flexneri. EMBO Rep. (2014) 15:965–72. 10.15252/embr.201338386
84.
BossisGMalnouCEFarrasRAndermarcherEHipskindRRodriguezMet al. Down-regulation of c-fos/c-jun ap-1 dimer activity by sumoylation. Mol Cell Biol. (2005) 25:6964–79. 10.1128/MCB.25.16.6964-6979.2005
85.
ChoiSJChungSSRhoEJLeeHWLeeMHChoiHSet al. Negative modulation of rxralpha transcriptional activity by small ubiquitin-related modifier (sumo) modification and its reversal by sumo-specific protease susp1. J Biol Chem. (2006) 281:30669–77. 10.1074/jbc.M604033200
86.
RibetDHamonMGouinENahoriMAImpensFNeyret-KahnHet al. Listeria monocytogenes impairs sumoylation for efficient infection. Nature. (2010) 464:1192–5. 10.1038/nature08963
87.
LapaquettePFritahSLhocineNAndrieuxANigroGMounierJet al. Shigella entry unveils a calcium/calpain-dependent mechanism for inhibiting sumoylation. Elife. (2017) 6:27444. 10.7554/eLife.27444
88.
VermaSMohapatraGAhmadSMRanaSJainSKhalsaJKet al. Salmonella engages host micrornas to modulate sumoylation: a new arsenal for intracellular survival. Mol Cell Biol. (2015) 35:2932–46. 10.1128/MCB.00397-15
89.
SrikanthCVVermaS. Sumoylation as an integral mechanism in bacterial infection and disease progression. Adv Exp Med Biol. (2017) 963:389–408. 10.1007/978-3-319-50044-7_22
90.
El MotiamAVidalSSeoaneRBouzaherYHGonzalez-SantamariaJRivasC. Sumo and cytoplasmic rna viruses: from enemies to best friends. Adv Exp Med Biol. (2020) 1233:263–77. 10.1007/978-3-030-38266-7_11
91.
SahuMSPatraSKumarKKaurR. Sumoylation in human pathogenic fungi: role in physiology and virulence. J Fungi (Basel). (2020) 6:32. 10.3390/jof6010032
92.
El-AsmiFMcManusFPThibaultPChelbi-AlixMK. Interferon, restriction factors and sumo pathways. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. (2020) 55:37–47. 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2020.03.001
93.
CrowlJTStetsonDB. Sumo2 and sumo3 redundantly prevent a noncanonical type i interferon response. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2018) 115:6798–803. 10.1073/pnas.1802114115
94.
YuSGaleffiFRodriguizRMWangZShenYLyuJet al. Small ubiquitin-like modifier 2 (sumo2) is critical for memory processes in mice. FASEB J. (2020) 34:14750–67. 10.1096/fj.202000850RR
95.
YangYXiaZWangXZhaoXShengZYeYet al. Small-molecule inhibitors targeting protein sumoylation as novel anticancer compounds. Mol Pharmacol. (2018) 94:885–94. 10.1124/mol.118.112300
Summary
Keywords
small ubiquitin like modifier, post-translational modification, cell stress response, adaptive response mechanism, intestinal pathologies
Citation
Karhausen J, Ulloa L and Yang W (2021) SUMOylation Connects Cell Stress Responses and Inflammatory Control: Lessons From the Gut as a Model Organ. Front. Immunol. 12:646633. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.646633
Received
27 December 2020
Accepted
01 February 2021
Published
19 February 2021
Volume
12 - 2021
Edited by
Marjorie K. De La Fuente, Las Condes Clinic, Chile
Reviewed by
Salman Ahmad Mustfa, King's College London, United Kingdom; Renata Curciarello, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Argentina
Updates
Copyright
© 2021 Karhausen, Ulloa and Yang.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Jörn Karhausen jorn.karhausen@duke.eduWei Yang wei.yang@duke.edu
This article was submitted to Mucosal Immunity, a section of the journal Frontiers in Immunology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.