Abstract
Dendritic cells (DCs) induce and regulate adaptive immunity through migrating and maturing in the kidney. In this procedure, they can adopt different phenotypes—rejection-associated DCs promote acute or chronic injury renal grafts while tolerogenic DCs suppress the overwhelmed inflammation preventing damage to renal functionality. All the subsets interact with effector T cells and regulatory T cells (Tregs) stimulated by the ischemia–reperfusion procedure, although the classification corresponding to different effects remains controversial. Thus, in this review, we discuss the origin, maturation, and pathological effects of DCs in the kidney. Then we summarize the roles of divergent DCs in renal transplantation: taking both positive and negative stages in ischemia–reperfusion injury (IRI), switching phenotypes to induce acute or chronic rejection, and orchestrating surface markers for allograft tolerance via alterations in metabolism. In conclusion, we prospect that multidimensional transcriptomic analysis will revolute researches on renal transplantation by addressing the elusive mononuclear phagocyte classification and providing a holistic view of DC ontogeny and subpopulations.
Introduction
In all tissues, DCs function in a network of mononuclear phagocytes with many innate immune cells taking center stage (). This network in the kidney is complex and heterogeneous, highly relying on macrophages and DCs (). Discovered by Metchnikoff 150 years ago, macrophages can mediate fibrosis after renal transplantation, whereas DCs were first described in 1973 by Steinman and Cohn as even elongated or stellate cells to present antigens. Given that DCs and macrophages are both involved in innate immune networks, DCs should have overlapping functionalities as macrophages in tissue homeostasis, promoting pathogen defense and contributing to acute or chronic rejection (, ). But compared with macrophages, the unique roles of DCs in rejection or tolerance are still ambiguous and undefined partly because they often share similar surface markers (–). Equipped with increasingly available kidney biopsy data, the recent outbreak in the high-dimensional analysis of single-cell has sparked instructions for the classification of these immune cells (–). In this review, we first describe the consensus of DC ontogeny encompassing the origins, maturation, and pathological effects of DCs in the kidney. We then summarize the major roles of kidney DCs in three major aspects of renal transplantation, including ischemic injury when grafts are removed from the donors, rejection including acute and chronic process, and tolerance including induced or natural genic tolerance. Finally, we point out certain obstacles and disadvantages to prospect the value of multidimensional transcriptomic analysis.
DC-Linked Pathological Procedure in Renal Transplantation
The Origin and Migration of DCs in Kidney Allograft Rejection
Like other tissues, dendritic cells in the kidney are derived from bone hematopoietic stem cells (Figure 1). Traditionally, cell surface markers were used to subdivide cDCs into cDC1 and cDC2 (). Human cDC1 mainly expressed CD11c, CD141, CLEC9A (C-type lectin domain family 9 member A) and highly expressed MHC (major histocompatibility complex) class II, while cDC2 mainly expressed CD11c, high- affinity Fc receptor for immunoglobin E, CD1c, CD1a and highly expressed CD11c and MHC class II. CD11c, MHC class II, CD26, and interferon-regulatory factor 8 (IRF8) are highly expressed in murine cDC1, and CLEC9A, XCR1, and CD103 are also expressed. In mice, cDC2 expresses high CD11c, MHC class II, CD11b, CD26, CX3CR1, interferon-regulatory factor 4, dendritic cell inhibitory receptor 2 but expresses low IRF8 and F4/80 (Table 1).
Figure 1
Table 1
| Clinical subsets | General functions | Key markers | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCs in IRI | Promotion of both inflammation and anti-inflammation | CD45, CD11c, MHC-II, TNF-α, CD80, CD86, CD40, CD54, C1d, CD8 α, but not CD4 and CD205 | (, ) |
| Rejection-related DCs | Promoting acute rejection and chronic rejection via different interaction with T cells | CD11c, MHC class II, CD1c, FcϵRI | () |
| Tolerogenic DCs | Inducing anti-rejection effects via suppressing various types of T cells and activating Treg cells | poor expression of MHC, T cell co-stimulatory molecules like CD40, CD80/86, and T cell co-inhibitory ligands (e.g., programmed death ligand-1 and death-inducing ligands) | (–) |
Remarkable features of three different types of DCs in renal transplantation.
FcϵRI, high- affinity Fc receptor for IgE; MHC, major histocompatibility complex.
Moreover, traditional DC subsets are described by lineage-specific transcription factors including DNA binding inhibitor 2 and interferon regulatory factor 4. In mice, the conventional DC group 1 (cDC1) express neither SiglecH nor Ly6C, while the precursor of the conventional DC group 2 (cDC2) express no SiglecH but Ly6C (). Based on these transcription factors, phagocytes expressing major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II and integrin CD11c are named cDCs. Another independent subgroup, unconventional plasma-like dendritic cells, expressed transcription factor E2-2 and its myeloid antigen but did not express CD123. Whether they are related to traditional DC is still doubtable.
During circulation, the precursor dendritic cells develop and differentiate into kidney-specific dendritic cells (). In the kidney, no more than 5% of dendritic cells are cDC1 expressing CD103; most DCs express CD11b and CX3CR1 and can be categorized into cDC2. Compared with dendritic cells in other parts of the body, kidney-specific dendritic cells can be located in the lymph nodes around the kidney and the kidney itself, which is essential for the control of adaptive immunity () (Figure 1). In the kidney, most of these phagocytes with the ability to activate T cells are located in the cortex. It can be confirmed that cDC1 is located near the blood vessels, while most of these cells near the subcapsular and arterial connective tissue have the morphology of macrophages. The high osmotic pressure of transplanted medulla may inhibit the antigen presentation of DCS to CD8+ T cells, but the specific type of DCs still needs to be further studied.
Chemokines and corresponding receptors induce the migration of kidney-specific DCs. Chemokines are detected by receptors on the surface of precursor DCs and precursor DCs can migrate along the inverse chemical gradient pathway to the source. Receptor expression determines the specificity of kidney DCs. CX3CR1 and CCR2 are incorporated into the action of leaving the bone marrow, and CXCR4 helps precursor DCs retention in the marrow (–). But the inflammatory conditions after transplantation possibly alter the migration mechanism to mediate both rejection and tolerance, which remain unidentified and might be potential intervention sites in the future (Figure 1).
The Maturation of DCs in Kidney Allograft Rejection
With no stimuli, immature kidney DCs inhibit T and B lymphocytes, which also can coordinate tolerance (). Danger-associated molecular patterns occur when ischemia and reperfusion happen, activating TLR4 (toll-like receptor 4) and leading to the maturation of DCs (–). This maturation induces inflammation and provokes adaptive immunity to specific antigens, such as alloantigen and so on (, ). According to Sporri and Reis e Sousa’s report, danger-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) cannot make DCs promote T-helper responses, but exposure to pathogen-associated molecular patterns can (). Taken together, DAMPs are not the most crucial pathway to activate DCs for allograft rejection (–). Furthermore, rejection can happen in T lymphocyte deficient conditions, implying that the maturation of DCs might be more than a complex mechanism triggered by DAMPs or pathogen-associated molecular patterns (–).
The Possible Downstream Effects of DCs in Kidney Allograft Rejection
Conventional hypothesis indicated donor DCs activate anti-donor rejection via migration to the host second lymphoid nodes providing alloantigen to recipient T cells (). This hypothesis resulted from observations on mouse models: T lymphocytes respond to antigen-presenting cells with non-self-MHC (major histocompatibility complex) in vivo (, ). Moreover, depleting leukocytes in the allografts drives long-term survival, whereas injecting donor DCs into the host restores acute rejection (–49). Later research established that donor and recipient DCs play equal roles in mediating the rejection process, and recipient DCs are even more stable to present antigens. Deleting recipient DCs prolonged allograft survival significantly but depleting donor DCs did not (50). Also, DCs lacking MHC or CD80/86 molecules are killed by recipient natural killer cells during migration to the lymphoid nodes (50–53). Recently, donor DCs are viewed as transporters of antigen rather than presenters of antigen (54). MHC molecules can be exchanged between the donor and recipient DCs (55, 56). Therefore, recipient DCs gain non-self MHC from donor DCs, capable to activate T lymphocytes originated from recipients through both non-self MHC and self MHC (57–62).
The basic function of mouse cDC1 is to use MHC class I molecules on its surface to extract antigens from CD8+ cytotoxic T cells and induce them to kill target cells. This plays a decisive role in the process of renal transplantation and may be directly related to cellular immunity. Also, mouse cDC1 can induce regulatory T cells in lymphatic circulation (63, 64). The function of human cDC1, which is different from that of mice, needs further study. However, compared with cDC1, cDC2 generally does not have the aforementioned antigen targeted by cytotoxic T cells (65–67). Therefore, in renal transplantation, cDC2 will not be killed by cytotoxic T cells but can induce B cells to respond through helper T cells, which may be the mechanism of antibody-mediated immune rejection (68). Finally, it has been revealed that cDC2 cells induce T helper cells to stimulate the production of pro-inflammatory mediators in the chronic renal inflammation model, so in the same chronic rejection, cDC2 may also be the center of inflammation and participate in the pathogenesis of immune effectors including antibodies.
DCs in IRI
IRI happens frequently following renal transplantation via recruitment of immune cells including DCs by pro-inflammatory cytokines like tumor necrosis factor derived from hypoxic endothelial cells (, 69) (Figure 2). The DCs involved in IRI have not been completely defined. Current studies tend to claim that DCs involved in IRI express CD45, CD11c, MHC-II, TNF-α, CD80, CD86, CD40, CD54 (ICAM), C1d, CD8 α, but not CD4 and CD205. All the markers might be useful in further investigations (Table 1). Then hypoxia-inducible factor 1α induces kidney DC maturation, damaging renal functionality (70–72). DCs can promote harmful activations of immune effects in vivo, but they are also associated with protecting renal function from IRI. Since immature DCs are less stimulatory than mature DCs, some researchers supposed that kidney DCs’ role is to harm allograft (73–76). DCs feature in IL-10 as well as single Ig IL-1-related receptor, therefore, exhibiting the inhibiting effects on inflammation in IRI (77). On the contrary, immature kidney DCs can serve as an adverse player to mature DCs, preventing IRI (78, 79). Thrombin could release IL-12, IL-17, and C3a thus causing T helper-1 bias to influence kidney DCs’ behaviors and determine the outcomes of IRI (80). High concentrations of tissue factors in the kidney may also contribute to IRI (81). Further studies are warranted to clarify the discrepancy about kidney DCs, especially the relationship between rejection-related DCs and tolerogenic DCs (Figure 2).
Figure 2
Rejection-Related DCs in Allografts
The traditional function of DCS is to mediate the rejection of harmful non-autogenous substances or abnormal autogenous materials, so the research on rejection-related DCs mostly employs traditional surface markers of cDCs. Although it is not recommended to judge the types of DCs based on only one surface marker, the comprehensive use of different surface markers can still accurately define rejection-related DCs (Table 1 for specific markers).
Acute Rejection Based on the DC-Dependent Mechanism
The interaction between DCs and T lymphocytes triggers a so-called acute rejection through the conventional pathway—donor DCs present alloantigen to recipient T cells directly (82, 83) (Figure 2). At first, the ischemia–reperfusion condition drives donor DCs to induce acute rejection (). Secondly, active DCs search for immature or memory T cells attracted by the chemical gradient of CCR7 to present the allografts (84). Early studies usually located this process in second lymphoid organs (85), while later observation indicated that second lymphoid organs are not necessary for acute rejection: acute rejection occurs even when lacking secondary lymphoid organs (86, 87). The identical role of DCs in acute renal rejection could be separated into interaction with memory T cells and naive T cells, which happens in many different places including the second lymphoid organs. Taken different DCs into consideration, recipient DCs may be germane to the acute rejection as well as donor DCs (88).
Chronic Rejection Based on the DC-Dependent Mechanism
Owing to a longer lifespan, recipient DCs are more likely to mediate the chronic rejection rather than donor DCs. According to observations in mouse kidney grafts, the recipient DCs replace most of the donor DCs within 24 h after surgery, and over 90% DCs are derived from recipients on the 7th day after transplantation (57). Subsequently, these DCs originated from monocytes in the host, but a few donor DCs still survive to activate T cells (57). The interaction between DCs and T cells has been more stable and prolonged since DCs reach into the renal cortex to arrest antigen-specific T cells around the endothelium with no regard to the chemical gradient. Independent of the chemical gradient, interruption of the protracted connection with T cells induces tolerance (89, 90). Also, infiltrating DCs activate B cells to promote chronic allograft rejection with the assist of T helper cells. This procedure depends on recipient DCs presenting antigen to recipient T helper cells, but the molecular mechanism remains elucidated (91–94). A few clinical trials are targeting this approach, whereas more current studies are paying attention to mediate tolerance taking advantage of the tolerogenic DCs and Tregs (95).
Tolerogenic DCs in Renal Transplantation
Remarkable Features of Tolerogenic DCs
As a pivotal part of innate immunity, tolerogenic DCs are usually defined as immature rejection-related DCs (96, 97). Tolerogenic DCs, also called DCregs, circulate in the body quiescently responding to endogenous or exogenous stimuli, for example, endogenous alarmins. These tolerogenic DCs exhibit poor expression of MHC, T cell co-stimulatory molecules like CD40, CD80/86, as well as T cell co-inhibitory ligands (e.g., programmed death ligand-1 and death-inducing ligands), presenting non-phagocyte properties (–) (Table 1). Meanwhile, these DCs express a larger amount of the macrophage inhibitor cytokine than rejection-related DCs (98). Moreover, tolerogenic DCs can change the amount of C1q on its surface approaching the mature state with the assistance of globular C1q receptors (99, 100). C1q, a complement subunit, mediates IL-10 secretion involved in the interaction between DCs and myeloid or lymphoid cells (101–103). Besides, tolerogenic DCs confine promoting inflammatory factors including IL-12p70 into a low level while producing a high level of anti-inflammatory molecular-like transforming growth factor β as well as IL-10 (104) (Figure 3).
Figure 3
According to transcription analysis, the Wnt/β-catenin pathway programs tolerogenic DCs to maintain a series of unique molecular markers (105–108), and tolerogenic DCs specifically express some genes, including CNGA1, CCL18, C1QB, MUCL1, MAP7, C1QC, CYP7B1, and CYP24A1 (109). Compared to immunologic DC, tolerogenic DCs possess a steady oxidative phosphorylation program and favor fatty acid oxidation associated with decreased reactive oxygen species (110). Based on these features, tolerogenic DCs stimulate T cells weakly or even suppress the function of T cells via anergy or apoptosis for long-term immaturity (111). Additionally, tolerogenic DCs can spare, expand, and induce Tregs as shown in Figure 3 (111–113). The interaction between tolerogenic DCs and divergent T cells results in conditions such as allograft rejection, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, graft-versus-host diseases, and autoimmune disorders (111, 114–116). But the specific mechanism buried in these phenomena remains elusive. Therefore, an increasing number of studies incorporate tolerogenic DCs into clinical trials in organ transplantation and autoimmune diseases (117–119).
Tolerogenic DCs Possible Anti-Rejection Effects
DCs inducing tolerance was first discovered in 1995/1996 (120, 121). Tolerogenic DCs have the potential to suppress allograft rejection because DCs with CD16− markers exist in transplant recipients compared with healthy people using single-cell RNA sequence (122). Also, infusion of tolerogenic DCs appears to be reliable and acceptable with or without immunosuppressive agents, which probably provides anti-rejection therapy in the future (111, 123). Ezzelarab et al. infused donor-derived tolerogenic DCs processed by vitamin D3, IL-10 into rhesus macaque models, showing that graft survival prolonged with no evidence of host sensitization (124). Autologous tolerogenic DC infusion could also lengthen the survival time of grafts, and murine IL-10-induced DCs can function as rejection inhibitors in vivo and in vitro expressing lower levels of MHCII, CD40, CD86, CD205 (125–127).
Donor-derived tolerogenic DCs can interact with alloreactive memory T cells including CD8+ and CD4+ cells (128, 129) (Figure 3). In specific, tolerogenic DCs increase allograft survival time relying on co-inhibition of cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) downregulation (128) (Figure 3), and coinhibitory CTLA-4 blocker treatment has the potential to improve prognosis in renal allografts (130, 131). Moreover, DC-induced CD95+ memory T cells could be an immunosuppressive phenotype with increased expression of programmed death-1 as well as coinhibitory CTLA-4 via Eomesodermin (an essential transcription factor maintenance) (124, 128, 132). Thereafter, the infusion of coinhibitory CTLA-4 immune globulin and tolerogenic DCs promotes transplant tolerance (129, 133). In this promotion, high expression of immune-globulin-like transcript 3 and immune-globulin-like transcript 4 causes CD4+CD45RO+CD25+ T cells to become Tregs mediated by the enzyme indoleamine 2, 3-dioxygenase in allografts (134) (135). As a result, the identical indoleamine-2,3-dioxygenase and immunoglobulin-l like transcript 3 as well as high expressions of both MAP7 and MUCL1 genes occur in the mechanism of vitamin D3 inducted tolerogenic DCs (136–140) (Figure 3).
Donor-derived tolerogenic DCs can prolong graft survival time: treatment of these DCs ensures graft survival another 50 to 300 days (125). Donor tolerogenic DCs regulate CD8+ as well as CD4+ memory T cell responses, and this regulation prevents potential rejections (141–145). These DCs capture vesicles containing allograft antigens but choose an anti-inflammation phenotype: the number of donor-reactive IL-17+ T cells remains low (125, 146). Further, donor-derived tolerogenic DCs induced by vitamin D3 and IL-10 moderate IL-17 associated inflammation and maintain stability even exposed to inflammatory molecules (124, 147). Most importantly, humans produce no specific antibody against injecting tolerogenic DCs (124). Moreover, without active recipient T cells, harmful antibodies derived from B cells will be reduced (148). Besides, multiple subsets of freshly isolated human DCs, including non-conventional plasmacytoid DCs, can regulate immune responses as well (107, 108, 149). Table 2 summarizes the versatile roles of DCs targeting solving rejection problems in renal transplantation, implying future evaluable clinical advances (153).
Table 2
| Animal Models | Interventions | Results | Functional roles or mechanisms | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rat | i.v. tolerogenic DCs derived from donors | increasing content of CD4+CD25+Foxp3+Tregs and up-regulated secretion of Th2 cytokines | The enzyme indoleamine 2, 3-dioxygenase in tolerogenic DCs may induce allograft immunotolerance. | (135) |
| Monkey | i.v. CTLA-4 immunoglobulin and tapered rapamycin | Graft median survival time prolongation as well as IL-17 production attenuation combined with no circulating anti-donor antibody | The beneficial effect of donor Ag-pulsed autologous tolerogenic DC on nonhuman primate graft survival may be modest but not statistically significant. | (125) |
| Monkey | i.v. donor-derived regulatory dendritic cell | Tolerogenic DC-mediated tolerance with or without cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen activation. | Pre-transplant DCreg infusion promotes tolerance after transplantation with no regard to CD28 blockade. | (129) |
| Mouse | Renal DCs were studied in collagenase-digested mouse kidneys | DCs migrate from the renal interstitial to renal lymph node within 48 h accompanied by increased DCs | Renal DCs respond to localized or systemic acute kidney injury by increasing the transport of protein antigens from the kidney to lymph nodes. | (74) |
| Mouse | Antigen coupled to an anti-CD205 antibody | Antigen-specific CD8 T-cell deletional tolerance | DEC-205 provides an effective receptor mechanism for DCs to deal with MHC class I presentation in vivo, which makes DCs produce stable immune tolerance and immune response after maturation. | (150) |
| Rhesus monkey | i.v. MD-3 anti- intercellular adhesion molecule antibody combined with low dose rapamycin and CD154 | Long-term survival of pig xenoislets | The maturation of DCs relies on intercellular adhesion molecule-1 and anti-intercellular adhesion molecule-1-induced antigen-specific T cell tolerance. | (151) |
| Humanized mouse | i.v. MD-3 antibody before transplantation | Xenospecific T-cell tolerance; prevention of xenoislet rejection | The maturation of DCs relies on intercellular adhesion molecule-1 and anti-intercellular adhesion molecule-1 -induced antigen-specific T cell tolerance. | (151) |
| Cynomolgus monkey | i.d. immunization with antigen fused to anti-DC-asialoglycoprotein receptor antibody every 5–6 weeks after the flu virus | Ag-specific, IL-10 producing Tregs in vivo | human DCs can generate antigen-specific suppressive CD4 T cells that produce interleukin 10 via DC-asialoglycoprotein receptor but not Dectin-1 or DC-specific intercellular adhesion molecule-3-grabbing nonintegrin. | (152) |
| Rhesus macaques | i.v. DCreg + B7-CD28 costimulation blocking agent cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen immunoglobin, 7 days before renal transplantation and for up to 8 weeks | Median graft survival time was 39.5 days in control monkeys and 113.5 days in tolerogenic DCs treated animals | Tolerogenic DCs generated from cytokine-mobilized donor blood monocytes in vitamin D3 and IL-10 moderate combined T cell- and antibody-mediated rejection. | (124) |
Versatile roles of DCs in renal transplantation.
The Generation of Tolerogenic DCs
Various cytokines and similar materials serve as triggers in vivo. Exposure to donor blood and immunosuppressive mediators, rapamycin, for example, might be a useful method in a non-human primate model (124, 129). Also, effective tolerogenic DCs can be endogenous. However, recipients’ natural killer cells tend to kill donor-derived DCs that can mediate Tregs. Addressing this issue, Morelli and colleagues deleted host DCs to protect the donor-derived DCs from being killed (154). Through this method, recipient DCs acquired exosomes released by the donor tolerogenic DCs and amplified the effect of tolerance via the third mechanism mentioned in The Possible Downstream Effects of DCs in Kidney Allograft Rejection (60). A few cytokines are able to induce tolerogenic DCs in vitro, for example, IL-10 and TGF-β (optimal inducible factors) (155) (Figure 4). IL-10 decreases MHC-II expression and costimulatory molecules in DC (156, 157). TGF-β increases the expression level of programmed death-ligand 1 and Fas-ligand on DC, inducing T cell apoptosis, and Treg differentiation (158, 159). Also, valuable methods can be used to produce tolerogenic DCs in vitro such as soluble Schistosoma Mansoni egg antigen, tumor necrosis factor α-induced protein 8 like-1, human soluble CD83, and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2). Soluble Schistosoma Mansoni egg antigen increases IL-10 level and suppresses Il-12p40 secretion, implying a novel method of tolerogenic DC generation (160). Except for IL-10 and TGF-β, tumor necrosis factor α-induced protein 8 like-1 could control the T cell activation procedure (161, 162). Human soluble CD83 alone achieves kidney allograft tolerance (>100 days) involving tolerogenic DC generation and indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase activation (163). Mature DCs treated with PGE2 could inhibit inflammation via IL-10 secretion (164, 165). Traditional immunosuppressants can also serve as inducers of tolerogenic DCs, for instance, rapamycin and dexamethasone (166–170). Tolerogenic DCs generated from dexamethasone exhibit few costimulatory molecules or pro-inflammatory cytokines (171). Besides, metastasis-associated lung adenocarcinoma transcript 1, mesenchymal stem cells, nuclear paraspeckle assembly transcript 1, LF 15-0195, and pluripotent stem cells have a potential capacity to facilitate the tolerogenic DCs since they have been proven in other organ transplants (172–174).
Figure 4
Tolerogenic DC activation relies on adenosine triphosphate derived from glycolysis and tricarboxylic acid. Thus, control of glycolysis regulates DCs in renal transplantation especially in a few key active sites (175, 176). For instance, insufficient energy support causes morphological alteration and disorders in migration to lymph nodes (177). Lipopolysaccharide, complement component C1q subcomponent-binding protein, 2-deoxyglucose, and 1,25-dihydroxy vitamin D3 are associated with oxidative phosphorylation, fatty acid oxidation, and reactive oxygen species. In glycolysis, lipopolysaccharide mediates fatty acid synthesis forming adenosine triphosphate to trigger DC activation (178). C1q subcomponent-binding protein participates in the tricarboxylic acid cycle via regulating pyruvate dehydrogenase as a chaperone protein (179). 2-deoxyglucose plays an essential role in reducing CD40, CD86, and MHC-II expression and secreting IL-6, IL-12p70, and TNF, which can be defined as features of tolerogenic DCs (178). Oxidative phosphorylation and fatty acid oxidation can be regulated by paracrine-derived Wnt5a protein linked tolerogenic DC generation, vitamin D3 or 1,25-dihydroxy vitamin D3 induction of tolerogenic DCs, and dexamethasone mediated tolerance (109, 180, 181). Specifically, these materials generate tolerogenic DCs through inducible nitric oxide synthase, nuclear factor E2-related factor 2: inducible nitric oxide synthase reduces oxidative phosphorylation and fatty acid oxidation, but nuclear factor E2-related factor 2 decreases the amount of inducible nitric oxide synthase expression (182, 183). As for the relationship between oxidative phosphorylation and fatty acid oxidation, miR-142 links to carnitine palmitoyltransferase-1a and induces more active fatty acid oxidation and further increases glycolysis promoting pro-inflammatory cytokines (184). Fatty acid inhibits oxidative phosphorylation and facilitates reactive oxygen species leading to more severe inflammation (185–187).
In addition to general metabolism, it is accurate and stable to induce tolerogenic DCs employing regulating signal pathways. The most well-known pathway that has been focused on is mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin) involving mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1) as well as mTOR complex 2 (mTORC2) (Figure 4). The inhibition of mTOR produces tolerogenic DCs associated with glucose metabolism. GM-CSF, IL-4, rapamycin, alum, and graphene quantum dots have effects on mTOR mediating potential tolerance via lower adenosine triphosphate generation (167, 188–190). Specifically, mTORC2 decreases adenosine triphosphate generated from mTORC1 mediating glycolysis, and mTORC1 takes crucial tasks in DC maturation (191) (Figure 4). Also, the upstream and downstream molecules contribute to the generation of tolerogenic DCs (Figure 2). An upstream complex called adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase can be suppressed by polyphenol resveratrol causing poor expression of mTOR (192). A downstream complex named after the peroxisome proliferators-activated receptor plays a metabolic role in DC maturation through targeting at mTORC1 and hypoxia-inducible factor-1a as a downstream complex serves to reprogram glycolysis for DC maturation via mTOR activation (177, 193–195). Reprogramming glycolysis in DCs can be finished by another kinase known as spleen tyrosine kinase depending on the production of IL-1b through a different mechanism compared with infection (196, 197).
STAT and NF-κB have also been incorporated into the maturity of DC as a family containing STAT1, STAT2, STAT3, STAT4, STAT5a, STAT5b, STAT6 as well as inhibiting STAT1, STAT2, and STAT5, and activating STAT3 induces tolerogenic DCs (198, 199) (Figures 2, 4). Targeting at STAT1, flavonoids decrease the expression of programmed death-ligand 1 to enable DCs more mature (200, 201). Silencing STAT1 with small interfering RNA in DCs causes low expression of CD83 and CD86, implying anti-inflammatory effects (202). STAT2 functions as a co-worker with STAT1 mediating cross-presentation of DC, and thus STAT2 should be suppressed when tolerogenic DCs are needed (203). STAT3 activation provides tolerogenic DCs because IFN-α-induced programmed death-ligand 1 expression is inhibited by suppressed STAT3, and STAT3-deficient DC could increase pro-inflammatory cytokines, promote antigen-dependent T cell activation (204, 205). With STAT5 inhibited by JQ1 in lipopolysaccharide-mediated DCs, the level of IL-12p70 secretion is decreased (206). Moreover, materials preventing NF-κB like small interfering RNA and Bay11-7082 have the potential to generate tolerogenic DCs in that they can serve as immunosuppressive tools in other organ transplants (207, 208) (Figure 4).
Conclusions and Possible Therapeutic Prospects
Compared with macrophages in kidney transplantation, renal DCs’ roles in ischemia–reperfusion, rejection or tolerance still need to clarify. For further investigation, a unified standard to separate kidney DCs from macrophages must be established based on the current level, since macrophages and DCs are both essential parts of innate immunity and they often function together inducing rejection or tolerance. This objective can be promoted by high-dimensional analysis of single-cell because increasing kidney biopsy samples provide an opportunity for revealing the markers and transcription different from macrophages. Additionally, the comparison of normal kidney and rejected kidney engenders valuable hypothesis and remarkable conclusions analyzed by artificial intelligence. In some respects, researchers tend to establish mouse models in experiments and this choice produces numerous discoveries and hinders translational medicine. Kidney transplantation saves tens of thousands of patients’ lives every year and costs millions of dollars handling rejection-associated problems meanwhile. Although donor DCs might mediate tolerance in vivo, patients still rely on traditional glucocorticoids and non-specific immunosuppress drugs. As a result, translational medicine should be emphasized immediately after the roles of DCs in renal transplantation being clarified. Finally, the relationship between rejection and tolerance and DCS is relatively clear, but the relationship between DCs and other complications of renal transplantation is still in a vague state. For example, infection related to renal transplantation may be related to intestinal flora, and the effect of intestinal flora on host immune status is likely to be achieved through DCs. In addition, the lifespan of donor DCS is not as long as that of recipient DCs, so the details of the interaction between the two DCS will also be the key to anti-rejection intervention at different time points after renal transplantation. On this basis, the understanding of the interaction between DCs and T cells of each transcript will also provide support for the development of anti-rejection drugs after transplantation.
Funding
The research reported in this study was funded by the Natural Science Foundation of China (81770752).
Statements
Author contributions
All authors listed have made a substantial, direct, and intellectual contribution to the work and approved it for publication.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
Van FurthRCohnZA. The Origin and Kinetics of Mononuclear Phagocytes. J Exp Med (1968) 128(3):415–35. doi: 10.1084/jem.128.3.415
2
NelsonPJReesAJGriffinMDHughesJKurtsCDuffieldJ. The Renal Mononuclear Phagocytic System. J Am Soc Nephrol (2012) 23(2):194–203. doi: 10.1681/asn.2011070680
3
KurtsCPanzerUAndersHJReesAJ. The Immune System and Kidney Disease: Basic Concepts and Clinical Implications. Nat Rev Immunol (2013) 13(10):738–53. doi: 10.1038/nri3523
4
SteinmanRMCohnZA. Identification of a Novel Cell Type in Peripheral Lymphoid Organs of Mice. I. Morphology, Quantitation, Tissue Distribution. J Exp Med (1973) 137(5):1142–62. doi: 10.1084/jem.137.5.1142
5
HumeDAGordonS. Mononuclear Phagocyte System of the Mouse Defined by Immunohistochemical Localization of Antigen F4/80. Identification of Resident Macrophages in Renal Medullary and Cortical Interstitium and the Juxtaglomerular Complex. J Exp Med (1983) 157(5):1704–9. doi: 10.1084/jem.157.5.1704
6
KrügerTBenkeDEitnerFLangAWirtzMHamilton-WilliamsEEet al. Identification and Functional Characterization of Dendritic Cells in the Healthy Murine Kidney and in Experimental Glomerulonephritis. J Am Soc Nephrol (2004) 15(3):613–21. doi: 10.1097/01.asn.0000114553.36258.91
7
GottschalkCKurtsC. The Debate About Dendritic Cells and Macrophages in the Kidney. Front Immunol (2015) 6:435. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00435
8
RegevATeichmannSALanderESAmitIBenoistCBirneyEet al. Science Forum: The Human Cell Atlas. Elife (2017) 6:e27041. doi: 10.7554/eLife.27041
9
YoungMDMitchellTJVieira BragaFATranMGBStewartBJFerdinandJRet al. Single-Cell Transcriptomes From Human Kidneys Reveal the Cellular Identity of Renal Tumors. Science (2018) 361(6402):594–9. doi: 10.1126/science.aat1699
10
SegererSHellerFLindenmeyerMTSchmidHCohenCDDraganoviciDet al. Compartment Specific Expression of Dendritic Cell Markers in Human Glomerulonephritis. Kidney Int (2008) 74(1):37–46. doi: 10.1038/ki.2008.99
11
MuellerFBYangHLubetzkyMVermaALeeJRDadhaniaDMet al. Landscape of Innate Immune System Transcriptome and Acute T Cell–Mediated Rejection of Human Kidney Allografts. JCI Insight (2019) 4(13):e128014. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.128014
12
GuilliamsMGinhouxFJakubzickCNaikSHOnaiNSchramlBUet al. Dendritic Cells, Monocytes and Macrophages: A Unified Nomenclature Based on Ontogeny. Nat Rev Immunol (2014) 14(8):571–8. doi: 10.1038/nri3712
13
DongXSwaminathanSBachmanLACroattAJNathKAGriffinMD. Resident Dendritic Cells are the Predominant TNF-secreting Cell in Early Renal Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury. Kidney Int (2007) 71(7):619–28. doi: 10.1038/sj.ki.5002132
14
DaiHThomsonAWRogersNM. Dendritic Cells as Sensors, Mediators, and Regulators of Ischemic Injury. Front Immunol (2019) 10:2418. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02418
15
JongbloedSLKassianosAJMcDonaldKJClarkGJJuXAngelCEet al. Human CD141+ (Bdca-3)+ Dendritic Cells (Dcs) Represent a Unique Myeloid DC Subset That Cross-Presents Necrotic Cell Antigens. J Exp Med (2010) 207(6):1247–60. doi: 10.1084/jem.20092140
16
SteinmanRMAdamsJCCohnZA. Identification of a Novel Cell Type in Peripheral Lymphoid Organs of Mice. IV. Identification and Distribution in Mouse Spleen. J Exp Med (1975) 141(4):804–20. doi: 10.1084/jem.141.4.804
17
MarínECuturiMCMoreauA. Tolerogenic Dendritic Cells in Solid Organ Transplantation: Where Do We Stand? Front Immunol (2018) 9:274. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00274
18
ZahorchakAFMacedoCHammDEButterfieldLHMetesDMThomsonAW. High PD-L1/CD86 MFI Ratio and IL-10 Secretion Characterize Human Regulatory Dendritic Cells Generated for Clinical Testing in Organ Transplantation. Cell Immunol (2018) 323:9–18. doi: 10.1016/j.cellimm.2017.08.008
19
LuLThomsonAW. Manipulation of Dendritic Cells for Tolerance Induction in Transplantation and Autoimmune Disease. Transplantation (2002) 73(1 SUPPL.):S19–22. doi: 10.1097/00007890-200201151-00008
20
LuLQianSHershbergerPARudertWALynchDHThomsonAW. Fas Ligand (CD95L) and B7 Expression on Dendritic Cells Provide Counter-Regulatory Signals for T Cell Survival and Proliferation. J Immunol (1997) 158(12):5676–84.
21
SchlitzerASivakamasundariVChenJSumatohHRSchreuderJLumJet al. Identification of cDC1- and Cdc2-Committed DC Progenitors Reveals Early Lineage Priming at the Common DC Progenitor Stage in the Bone Marrow. Nat Immunol (2015) 16(7):718–28. doi: 10.1038/ni.3200
22
WorbsTHammerschmidtSIFörsterR. Dendritic Cell Migration in Health and Disease. Nat Rev Immunol (2017) 17(1):30–48. doi: 10.1038/nri.2016.116
23
AlvarezDVollmannEHvon AndrianUH. Mechanisms and Consequences of Dendritic Cell Migration. Immunity (2008) 29(3):325–42. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2008.08.006
24
NakanoHLyons-CohenMRWhiteheadGSNakanoKCookDN. Distinct Functions of CXCR4, CCR2, and CX3CR1 Direct Dendritic Cell Precursors From the Bone Marrow to the Lung. J Leukoc Biol (2017) 101(5):1143–53. doi: 10.1189/jlb.1A0616-285R
25
ShiQZhuangFLiuJTLiNChenYXSuXBet al. Single-Cell Analyses Reveal Functional Classification of Dendritic Cells and Their Potential Roles in Inflammatory Disease. FASEB J (2019) 33(3):3784–94. doi: 10.1096/fj.201801489R
26
ScottCLBainCCWrightPBSichienDKotarskyKPerssonEKet al. CCR2(+)CD103(-) Intestinal Dendritic Cells Develop From DC-committed Precursors and Induce interleukin-17 Production by T Cells. Mucosal Immunol (2015) 8(2):327–39. doi: 10.1038/mi.2014.70
27
MatzingerP. Tolerance, Danger, and the Extended Family. Annu Rev Immunol (1994) 12:991–1045. doi: 10.1146/annurev.iy.12.040194.005015
28
KrügerBKrickSDhillonNLernerSMAmesSBrombergJSet al. Donor Toll-Like Receptor 4 Contributes to Ischemia and Reperfusion Injury Following Human Kidney Transplantation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2009) 106(9):3390–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0810169106
29
LaRosaDFRahmanAHTurkaLA. The Innate Immune System in Allograft Rejection and Tolerance. J Immunol (2007) 178(12):7503–9. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.178.12.7503
30
RaoDAPoberJS. Endothelial Injury, Alarmins, and Allog Raft Rejection. Crit Rev Immunol (2008) 28(3):229–48. doi: 10.1615/critrevimmunol.v28.i3.40
31
KonoHRockKL. How Dying Cells Alert the Immune System to Danger. Nat Rev Immunol (2008) 8(4):279–89. doi: 10.1038/nri2215
32
SpörriRReis e SousaC. Inflammatory Mediators are Insufficient for Full Dendritic Cell Activation and Promote Expansion of CD4+ T Cell Populations Lacking Helper Function. Nat Immunol (2005) 6(2):163–70. doi: 10.1038/ni1162
33
TesarBMZhangJLiQGoldsteinDR. TH1 Immune Responses to Fully MHC Mismatched Allografts are Diminished in the Absence of MyD88, a Toll-Like Receptor Signal Adaptor Protein. Am J Transplant (2004) 4(9):1429–39. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2004.00544.x
34
McKayDShigeokaARubinsteinMSurhCSprentJ. Simultaneous Deletion of MyD88 and Trif Delays Major Histocompatibility and Minor Antigen Mismatch Allograft Rejection. Eur J Immunol (2006) 36(8):1994–2002. doi: 10.1002/eji.200636249
35
OberbarnscheidtMHObhraiJSWilliamsALRothsteinDMShlomchikWDChalasaniGet al. Type I Interferons are Not Critical for Skin Allograft Rejection or the Generation of Donor-Specific CD8+ Memory T Cells: Brief Communication. Am J Transplant (2010) 10(1):162–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02871.x
36
LiHMatte-MartoneCTanHSVenkatesanSMcNiffJDemetrisAJet al. Graft-Versus-Host Disease is Independent of Innate Signaling Pathways Triggered by Pathogens in Host Hematopoietic Cells. J Immunol (2011) 186(1):230–41. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1002965
37
BingamanAWHaJWaitzeSYDurhamMMChoHRTucker-BurdenCet al. Vigorous Allograft Rejection in the Absence of Danger. J Immunol (2000) 164(6):3065–71. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.164.6.3065
38
AndersonCCCarrollJMGallucciSRidgeJPCheeverAWMatzingerP. Testing Time-, Ignorance-, and Danger-Based Models of Tolerance. J Immunol (2001) 166(6):3663–71. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.166.6.3663
39
AndersonCCMatzingerP. Immunity or Tolerance: Opposite Outcomes of Microchimerism From Skin Grafts. Nat Med (2001) 7(1):80–7. doi: 10.1038/83393
40
ZecherDLiQOberbarnscheidtMHDemetrisAJShlomchikWDRothsteinDMet al. NK Cells Delay Allograft Rejection in Lymphopenic Hosts by Downregulating the Homeostatic Proliferation of CD8+ T Cells. J Immunol (2010) 184(12):6649–57. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0903729
41
LarsenCPMorrisPJAustynJM. Migration of Dendritic Leukocytes From Cardiac Allografts Into Host Spleens. A Novel Pathway for Initiation of Rejection. J Exp Med (1990) 171(1):307–14. doi: 10.1084/jem.171.1.307
42
MacEdoCOrkisEAPopescuIElinoffBDZeeviAShapiroRet al. Contribution of Naïve and Memory T-Cell Populations to the Human Alloimmune Response. Am J Transplant (2009) 9(9):2057–66. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02742.x
43
SuchinEJLangmuirPBPalmerESayeghMHWellsADTurkaLA. Quantifying the Frequency of Alloreactive T Cells In Vivo: New Answers to an Old Question. J Immunol (2001) 166(2):973–81. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.166.2.973
44
LaffertyKJBootesADartGTalmageDW. Effect of Organ Culture on the Survival of Thyroid Allografts in Mice. Transplantation (1976) 22(2):138–49. doi: 10.1097/00007890-197608000-00009
45
TalmageDWDartGRadovichJLaffertyKJ. Activation of Transplant Immunity: Effect of Donor Leukocytes on Thyroid Allograft Rejection. Science (1976) 191(4225):385–8. doi: 10.1126/science.1082167
46
BowenKMAndrusLLaffertyKJ. Successful Allotransplantation of Mouse Pancreatic Islets to Nonimmunosuppressed Recipients. DIABETES (1980) 29(SUPPL. 1):98–104. doi: 10.2337/diab.29.1.s98
47
BatchelorJRWelshKIMaynardABurgosH. Failure of Long Surviving, Passively Enhanced Kidney Allografts to Provoke T-dependent Alloimmunity: I. Retransplantation of (as × AUG)F1 Kidneys Into Secondary AS Recipients. J Exp Med (1979) 150(3):455–64. doi: 10.1084/jem.150.3.455
48
LechlerRIBatchelorJR. Restoration of Immunogenicity to Passenger Cell-Depleted Kidney Allografts by the Addition of Donor Strain Dendritic Cells. J Exp Med (1982) 155(1):31–41. doi: 10.1084/jem.155.1.31
49
WelshKIBatchelorJRMaynardABurgosH. Failure of Long Surviving, Passively Enhanced Kidney Allografts to Provoke T-dependent Alloimmunity: II. Retransplantation of (as × AUG)F1 Kidneys From as Primary Recipients Into (as X WF)F1 Secondary Hosts. J Exp Med (1979) 150(3):465–70. doi: 10.1084/jem.150.3.465
50
GarrodKRLiuFCForrestLEParkerIKangSMCahalanMD. NK Cell Patrolling and Elimination of Donor-Derived Dendritic Cells Favor Indirect Alloreactivity. J Immunol (2010) 184(5):2329–36. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0902748
51
MannonRBGriffithsRRuizPPlattJLCoffmanTM. Absence of Donor MHC Antigen Expression Ameliorates Chronic Kidney Allograft Rejection. Kidney Int (2002) 62(1):290–300. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2002.00422.x
52
GrusbyMJAuchinclossJLeeRJohnsonRSSpencerJPZijlstraMet al. Mice Lacking Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I and Class II Molecules. Proc Natl Acad Sci U.S.A. (1993) 90(9):3913–7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.9.3913
53
GarrodKRWeiSHParkerICahalanMD. Natural Killer Cells Actively Patrol Peripheral Lymph Nodes Forming Stable Conjugates to Eliminate MHC-mismatched Targets. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2007) 104(29):12081–6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0702867104
54
MorelliAE. Dendritic Cells of Myeloid Lineage: The Masterminds Behind Acute Allograft Rejection. Curr Opin Organ Transplant (2014) 19(1):20–7. doi: 10.1097/MOT.0000000000000039
55
HerreraOBGolshayanDTibbottROchoaFSJamesMJMarelli-BergFMet al. A Novel Pathway of Alloantigen Presentation by Dendritic Cells. J Immunol (2004) 173(8):4828–37. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.173.8.4828
56
SivaganeshSHarperSJConlonTMCallaghanCJSaeb-ParsyKNegusMCet al. Copresentation of Intact and Processed MHC Alloantigen by Recipient Dendritic Cells Enables Delivery of Linked Help to Alloreactive CD8 T Cells by Indirect-Pathway CD4 T Cells. J Immunol (2013) 190(11):5829–38. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1300458
57
ZhuangQLakkisFG. Dendritic Cells and Innate Immunity in Kidney Transplantation. Kidney Int (2015) 87(4):712–8. doi: 10.1038/ki.2014.430
58
LiuQRojas-CanalesDMDivitoSJShufeskyWJStolzDBErdosGet al. Donor Dendritic Cell-Derived Exosomes Promote Allograft-Targeting Immune Response. J Clin Invest (2016) 126(8):2805–20. doi: 10.1172/JCI84577
59
MarinoJBabiker-MohamedMHCrosby-BertoriniPPasterJTLeGuernCGermanaSet al. Donor Exosomes Rather Than Passenger Leukocytes Initiate Alloreactive T Cell Responses After Transplantation. Sci Immunol (2016) 1(1):aaf8759. doi: 10.1126/sciimmunol.aaf8759
60
LindenberghMFSStoorvogelW. Antigen Presentation by Extracellular Vesicles From Professional Antigen-Presenting Cells. Annu Rev Immunol: Annu Rev Inc (2018) 36:435–59. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-041015-055700
61
ZhuangQLiuQDivitoSJZengQYatimKMHughesADet al. Graft-Infiltrating Host Dendritic Cells Play a Key Role in Organ Transplant Rejection. Nat Commun (2016) 7(1):1–12. doi: 10.1038/ncomms12623
62
JoffreOPSeguraESavinaAAmigorenaS. Cross-Presentation by Dendritic Cells. Nat Rev Immunol (2012) 12(8):557–69. doi: 10.1038/nri3254
63
YamazakiSDudziakDHeidkampGFFioreseCBonitoAJInabaKet al. Cd8+ CD205+ Splenic Dendritic Cells are Specialized to Induce Foxp3+ Regulatory T Cells. J Immunol (2008) 181(10):6923–33. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.181.10.6923
64
GototJDhanaEYagitaHKaiserRLudwig-PortugallIKurtsC. Antigen-Specific Helios(-), Neuropilin-1(-) Tregs Induce Apoptosis of Autoreactive B Cells Via PD-L1. Immunol Cell Biol (2018) 96(8):852–62. doi: 10.1111/imcb.12053
65
den HaanJMLeharSMBevanMJ. CD8(+) But Not CD8(-) Dendritic Cells Cross-Prime Cytotoxic T Cells In Vivo. J Exp Med (2000) 192(12):1685–96. doi: 10.1084/jem.192.12.1685
66
BelzGTBehrensGMSmithCMMillerJFJonesCLejonKet al. The CD8alpha(+) Dendritic Cell is Responsible for Inducing Peripheral Self-Tolerance to Tissue-Associated Antigens. J Exp Med (2002) 196(8):1099–104. doi: 10.1084/jem.20020861
67
HildnerKEdelsonBTPurthaWEDiamondMMatsushitaHKohyamaMet al. Batf3 Deficiency Reveals a Critical Role for CD8alpha+ Dendritic Cells in Cytotoxic T Cell Immunity. Science (2008) 322(5904):1097–100. doi: 10.1126/science.1164206
68
KurtsCRobinsonBWKnollePA. Cross-Priming in Health and Disease. Nat Rev Immunol (2010) 10(6):403–14. doi: 10.1038/nri2780
69
SchlichtingCLSchareckWDWeisM. Renal Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury: New Implications of Dendritic Cell-Endothelial Cell Interactions. Transplant Proc (2006) 38(3):670–3. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2006.01.059
70
JantschJChakravorttyDTurzaNPrechtelATBuchholzBGerlachRGet al. Hypoxia and Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1 Alpha Modulate Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Dendritic Cell Activation and Function. J Immunol (2008) 180(7):4697–705. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.180.7.4697
71
XuLSharkeyDCantleyLG. Tubular GM-CSF Promotes Late Mcp-1/Ccr2-Mediated Fibrosis and Inflammation After Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury. J Am Soc Nephrol (2019) 30(10):1825–40. doi: 10.1681/asn.2019010068
72
FerhatMRobinAGiraudSSenaSGoujonJMTouchardGet al. Endogenous IL-33 Contributes to Kidney Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury as an Alarmin. J Am Soc Nephrol (2018) 29(4):1272–88. doi: 10.1681/asn.2017060650
73
RogersNMMatthewsTJKausmanJYKitchingARCoatesPT. Review Article: Kidney Dendritic Cells: Their Role in Homeostasis, Inflammation and Transplantation. Nephrol (Carlton) (2009) 14(7):625–35. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1797.2009.01200.x
74
DongXSwaminathanSBachmanLACroattAJNathKAGriffinMD. Antigen Presentation by Dendritic Cells in Renal Lymph Nodes is Linked to Systemic and Local Injury to the Kidney. Kidney Int (2005) 68(3):1096–108. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.00502.x
75
Burne-TaneyMJKoflerJYokotaNWeisfeldtMTraystmanRJRabbH. Acute Renal Failure After Whole Body Ischemia is Characterized by Inflammation and T Cell-Mediated Injury. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol (2003) 285(1):F87–94. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00026.2003
76
YsebaertDKDe GreefKEDe BeufAVan RompayARVercauterenSPersyVPet al. T Cells as Mediators in Renal Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury. Kidney Int (2004) 66(2):491–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.761_4.x
77
LechMAvila-FerrufinoAAllamRSegererSKhandogaAKrombachFet al. Resident Dendritic Cells Prevent Postischemic Acute Renal Failure by Help of Single Ig IL-1 Receptor-Related Protein. J Immunol (2009) 183(6):4109–18. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0900118
78
KimHSeedB. The Transcription Factor MafB Antagonizes Antiviral Responses by Blocking Recruitment of Coactivators to the Transcription Factor IRF3. Nat Immunol (2010) 11(8):743–50. doi: 10.1038/ni.1897
79
ChoWYChoiHMLeeSYKimMGKimHKJoSK. The Role of Tregs and CD11c(+) Macrophages/Dendritic Cells in Ischemic Preconditioning of the Kidney. Kidney Int (2010) 78(10):981–92. doi: 10.1038/ki.2010.266
80
PontrelliPCarielloMRascioFGiganteMVerrientiRTataranniTet al. Thrombin may Modulate Dendritic Cell Activation in Kidney Transplant Recipients With Delayed Graft Function. Nephrol Dial Transplant (2015) 30(9):1480–7. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfv129
81
StalloneGPontrelliPRascioFCastellanoGGesualdoLGrandalianoG. Coagulation and Fibrinolysis in Kidney Graft Rejection. Front Immunol (2020) 11:1807. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01807
82
SiuJHYSurendrakumarVRichardsJAPettigrewGJ. T Cell Allorecognition Pathways in Solid Organ Transplantation. Front Immunol (2018) 9:2548. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02548
83
MeradMCollinMBrombergJ. Dendritic Cell Homeostasis and Trafficking in Transplantation. Trends Immunol (2007) 28(8):353–9. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2007.06.003
84
SallustoFLenigDFörsterRLippMLanzavecchiaA. Two Subsets of Memory T Lymphocytes With Distinct Homing Potentials and Effector Functions. Nature (1999) 401(6754):708–12. doi: 10.1038/44385
85
LakkisFGArakelovAKoniecznyBTInoueY. Immunologic ‘Ignorance’ of Vascularized Organ Transplants in the Absence of Secondary Lymphoid Tissue. Nat Med (2000) 6(6):686–8. doi: 10.1038/76267
86
ChalasaniGDaiZKoniecznyBTBaddouraFKLakkisFG. Recall and Propagation of Allospecific Memory T Cells Independent of Secondary Lymphoid Organs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2002) 99(9):6175–80. doi: 10.1073/pnas.092596999
87
ObhraiJSOberbarnscheidtMHHandTWDiggsLChalasaniGLakkisFG. Effector T Cell Differentiation and Memory T Cell Maintenance Outside Secondary Lymphoid Organs. J Immunol (2006) 176(7):4051–8. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.176.7.4051
88
HeegerPSGreenspanNSKuhlenschmidtSDejeloCHricikDESchulakJAet al. Pretransplant Frequency of Donor-Specific, IFN-γ-Producing Lymphocytes is a Manifestation of Immunologic Memory and Correlates With the Risk of Posttransplant Rejection Episodes. J Immunol (1999) 163(4):2267–75.
89
WakimLMWaithmanJVan RooijenNHeathWRCarboneFR. Dendritic Cell-Induced Memory T Cell Activation in Nonlymphoid Tissues. Science (2008) 319(5860):198–202. doi: 10.1126/science.1151869
90
WalchJMZengQLiQOberbarnscheidtMHHoffmanRAWilliamsALet al. Cognate Antigen Directs CD8+ T Cell Migration to Vascularized Transplants. J Clin Invest (2013) 123(6):2663–71. doi: 10.1172/JCI66722
91
DongVMWomerKLSayeghMH. Transplantation Tolerance: The Concept and its Applicability. Pediatr Transplant (1999) 3(3):181–92. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-3046.1999.00042.x
92
ZhuangQLiuQDivitoSJZengQYatimKMHughesADet al. Graft-Infiltrating Host Dendritic Cells Play a Key Role in Organ Transplant Rejection. Nat Commun (2016) 7:12623. doi: 10.1038/ncomms12623
93
SnelgroveSLLoCHallPLoCYAlikhanMACoatesPTet al. Activated Renal Dendritic Cells Cross Present Intrarenal Antigens After Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury. Transplantation (2017) 101(5):1013–24. doi: 10.1097/tp.0000000000001427
94
RubenJMGarcía-RomoGSBremanEvan der KooijSRedekerAArensRet al. Human Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cells Acquire Phagocytic Capacity by TLR9 Ligation in the Presence of Soluble Factors Produced by Renal Epithelial Cells. Kidney Int (2018) 93(2):355–64. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2017.08.006
95
OchandoJOrdikhaniFJordanSBorosPThomsonAW. Tolerogenic Dendritic Cells in Organ Transplantation. Transpl Int (2020) 33(2):113–27. doi: 10.1111/tri.13504
96
BanchereauJSteinmanRM. Dendritic Cells and the Control of Immunity. Nature (1998) 392(6673):245–52. doi: 10.1038/32588
97
SteinmanRM. Decisions About Dendritic Cells: Past, Present, and Future. Annu Rev Immunol (2012) 30:1–22. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-100311-102839
98
ZhouZLiWSongYWangLZhangKYangJet al. Growth Differentiation factor-15 Suppresses Maturation and Function of Dendritic Cells and Inhibits Tumor-Specific Immune Response. PloS One (2013) 8(11):e78618. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078618
99
CastellanoGWoltmanAMNautaAJRoosATrouwLASeelenMAet al. Maturation of Dendritic Cells Abrogates C1q Production In Vivo and In Vitro. Blood (2004) 103(10):3813–20. doi: 10.1182/blood-2003-09-3046
100
SonMSantiago-SchwarzFAl-AbedYDiamondB. C1q Limits Dendritic Cell Differentiation and Activation by Engaging LAIR-1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U.S.A. (2012) 109(46):E3160–7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1212753109
101
MascarellLAiroucheSBerjontNGaryCGueguenCFourcadeGet al. The Regulatory Dendritic Cell Marker C1q is a Potent Inhibitor of Allergic Inflammation. Mucosal Immunol (2017) 10(3):695–704. doi: 10.1038/mi.2016.87
102
HosszuKKValentinoAVinayagasundaramUVinayagasundaramRJoyceMGJiYet al. Dc-Sign, C1q, and gC1qR Form a Trimolecular Receptor Complex on the Surface of Monocyte-Derived Immature Dendritic Cells. Blood (2012) 120(6):1228–36. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-07-369728
103
ZimmerABouleyJLe MignonMPliquetEHoriotSTurfkruyerMet al. A Regulatory Dendritic Cell Signature Correlates With the Clinical Efficacy of Allergen-Specific Sublingual Immunotherapy. J Allergy Clin Immunol (2012) 129(4):1020–30. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2012.02.014
104
MaldonadoRAvon AndrianUH. How Tolerogenic Dendritic Cells Induce Regulatory T Cells. Adv Immunol (2010) 108:111–65. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-380995-7.00004-5
105
Vander LugtBRiddellJKhanAAHackneyJALeschJDeVossJet al. Transcriptional Determinants of Tolerogenic and Immunogenic States During Dendritic Cell Maturation. J Cell Biol (2017) 216(3):779–92. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201512012
106
SwaffordDManicassamyS. Wnt Signaling in Dendritic Cells: Its Role in Regulation of Immunity and Tolerance. Discovery Med (2015) 19(105):303–10.
107
LiuYJ. Dendritic Cell Subsets and Lineages, and Their Functions in Innate and Adaptive Immunity. Cell (2001) 106(3):259–62. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00456-1
108
UenoHKlechevskyEMoritaRAspordCCaoTMatsuiTet al. Dendritic Cell Subsets in Health and Disease. Immunol Rev (2007) 219(1):118–42. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2007.00551.x
109
Navarro-BarriusoJMansillaMJNaranjo-GómezMSánchez-PlaAQuirant-SánchezBTeniente-SerraAet al. Comparative Transcriptomic Profile of Tolerogenic Dendritic Cells Differentiated With Vitamin D3, Dexamethasone and Rapamycin. Sci Rep (2018) 8(1):14985. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-33248-7
110
SimWJAhlPJConnollyJE. Metabolism Is Central to Tolerogenic Dendritic Cell Function. Mediators Inflammation (2016) 2016:2636701. doi: 10.1155/2016/2636701
111
MorelliAEThomsonAW. Tolerogenic Dendritic Cells and the Quest for Transplant Tolerance. Nat Rev Immunol (2007) 7(8):610–21. doi: 10.1038/nri2132
112
HuangHDawickiWZhangXTownJGordonJR. Tolerogenic Dendritic Cells Induce CD4+CD25 hiFoxp3+ Regulatory T Cell Differentiation From CD4 +Cd25-/loFoxp3- Effector T Cells. J Immunol (2010) 185(9):5003–10. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0903446
113
RakerVKDomogallaMPSteinbrinkK. Tolerogenic Dendritic Cells for Regulatory T Cell Induction in Man. Front Immunol (2015) 6:569. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00569
114
StengerEOTurnquistHRMaparaMYThomsonAW. Dendritic Cells and Regulation of Graft-Versus-Host Disease and Graft-Versus-Leukemia Activity. Blood (2012) 119(22):5088–103. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-11-364091
115
HilkensCMUIsaacsJDThomsonAW. Development of Dendritic Cell-Based Immunotherapy for Autoimmunity. Int Rev Immunol (2010) 29(2):156–83. doi: 10.3109/08830180903281193
116
ThomsonAWRobbinsPD. Tolerogenic Dendritic Cells for Autoimmune Disease and Transplantation. Ann Rheum Dis (2008) 67(SUPPL. 3):iii90–iii6. doi: 10.1136/ard.2008.099176
117
VerhasseltVVostersOBeuneuCNicaiseCStordeurPGoldmanM. Induction of FOXP3-expressing Regulatory CD4pos T Cells by Human Mature Autologous Dendritic Cells. Eur J Immunol (2004) 34(3):762–72. doi: 10.1002/eji.200324552
118
JonuleitHSchmittESchulerGKnopJEnkAH. Induction of Interleukin 10-Producing, Nonproliferating CD4(+) T Cells With Regulatory Properties by Repetitive Stimulation With Allogeneic Immature Human Dendritic Cells. J Exp Med (2000) 192(9):1213–22. doi: 10.1084/jem.192.9.1213
119
DhodapkarMVSteinmanRMKrasovskyJMunzCBhardwajN. Antigen-Specific Inhibition of Effector T Cell Function in Humans After Injection of Immature Dendritic Cells. J Exp Med (2001) 193(2):233–8. doi: 10.1084/jem.193.2.233
120
RastelliniCLuLRicorbiCStarzlTERaoASThomsonAW. Granulocyte/Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor-Stimulated Hepatic Dendritic Cell Progenitors Prolong Pancreatic Islet Allograft Survival. Transplantation (1995) 60(11):1366–70.
121
FuFLiYQianSLuLChambersFStarzlTEet al. Costimulatory Molecule-Deficient Dendritic Cell Progenitors (MHC Class II+, CD80(Dim), CD86-) Prolong Cardiac Allograft Survival in Nonimmunosuppressed Recipients. Transplantation (1996) 62(5):659–65. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199609150-00021
122
WuHMaloneAFDonnellyELKiritaYUchimuraKRamakrishnanSMet al. Single-Cell Transcriptomics of a Human Kidney Allograft Biopsy Specimen Defines a Diverse Inflammatory Response. J Am Soc Nephrol (2018) 29(8):2069–80. doi: 10.1681/asn.2018020125
123
BeriouGMoreauACuturiMC. Tolerogenic Dendritic Cells: Applications for Solid Organ Transplantation. Curr Opin Organ Transplant (2012) 17(1):42–7. doi: 10.1097/MOT.0b013e32834ee662
124
EzzelarabMBZahorchakAFLuLMorelliAEChalasaniGDemetrisAJet al. Regulatory Dendritic Cell Infusion Prolongs Kidney Allograft Survival in Nonhuman Primates. Am J Transplant (2013) 13(8):1989–2005. doi: 10.1111/ajt.12310
125
EzzelarabMBRaich-RegueDLuLZahorchakAFPerez-GutierrezAHumarAet al. Renal Allograft Survival in Nonhuman Primates Infused With Donor Antigen-Pulsed Autologous Regulatory Dendritic Cells. Am J Transplant (2017) 17(6):1476–89. doi: 10.1111/ajt.14182
126
MadelonNMontanariEGruazLPimentaJMullerYDBühlerLHet al. Prolongation of Rat-to-Mouse Islets Xenograft Survival by Co-Transplantation of Autologous IL-10 Differentiated Murine Tolerogenic Dendritic Cells. Xenotransplantation (2020) 27(4):e12584. doi: 10.1111/xen.12584
127
MarinelarenaABhattacharyaPKumarPMakerAVPrabhakarBS. Identification of a Novel Ox40l(+) Dendritic Cell Subset That Selectively Expands Regulatory T Cells. Sci Rep (2018) 8(1):14940. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-33307-z
128
EzzelarabMBLuLGuoHZahorchakAFShufeskyWFCooperDKCet al. Eomesoderminlo CTLA4hi Alloreactive CD8+ Memory T Cells Are Associated With Prolonged Renal Transplant Survival Induced by Regulatory Dendritic Cell Infusion in CTLA4 Immunoglobulin-Treated Nonhuman Primates. Transplantation (2016) 100(1):91–102. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000000871
129
EzzelarabMBLuLShufeskyWFMorelliAEThomsonAW. Donor-Derived Regulatory Dendritic Cell Infusion Maintains Donor-Reactive CD4(+)CTLA4(Hi) T Cells in Non-Human Primate Renal Allograft Recipients Treated With CD28 Co-Stimulation Blockade. Front Immunol (2018) 9:250. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00250
130
LinHRathmellJCGrayGSThompsonCBLeidenJMAlegreML. Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte Antigen 4 (CTLA4) Blockade Accelerates the Acute Rejection of Cardiac Allografts in CD28-deficient Mice: CTLA4 can Function Independently of CD28. J Exp Med (1998) 188(1):199–204. doi: 10.1084/jem.188.1.199
131
GrimbertPAudardVDietCMatignonMPlonquetAMansourHet al. T-Cell Phenotype in Protocol Renal Biopsy From Transplant Recipients Treated With Belatacept-Mediated Co-Stimulatory Blockade. Nephrol Dial Transplant (2011) 26(3):1087–93. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfq453
132
IntlekoferAMTakemotoNWherryEJLongworthSANorthrupJTPalanivelVRet al. Effector and Memory CD8+ T Cell Fate Coupled by T-bet and Eomesodermin. Nat Immunol (2005) 6(12):1236–44. doi: 10.1038/ni1268
133
VincentiFCharpentierBVanrenterghemYRostaingLBresnahanBDarjiPet al. A Phase III Study of Belatacept-Based Immunosuppression Regimens Versus Cyclosporine in Renal Transplant Recipients (BENEFIT Study). Am J Transplant (2010) 10(3):535–46. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.03005.x
134
StalloneGPontrelliPInfanteBGiganteMNettiGSRanieriEet al. Rapamycin Induces ILT3(high)ILT4(high) Dendritic Cells Promoting a New Immunoregulatory Pathway. Kidney Int (2014) 85(4):888–97. doi: 10.1038/ki.2013.337
135
NaNLuoYZhaoDQYangSCHongLQLiHet al. Prolongation of Kidney Allograft Survival Regulated by Indoleamine 2,3-Dioxygenase in Immature Dendritic Cells Generated From Recipient Type Bone Marrow Progenitors. Mol Immunol (2016) 79:22–31. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2016.09.005
136
SzélesLKeresztesGTöröcsikDBalajthyZKrenácsLPóliskaSet al. 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 is an Autonomous Regulator of the Transcriptional Changes Leading to a Tolerogenic Dendritic Cell Phenotype. J Immunol (2009) 182(4):2074–83. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0803345
137
VanherwegenASCookDPFerreiraGBGysemansCMathieuC. Vitamin D-modulated Dendritic Cells Delay Lethal Graft-Versus-Host Disease Through Induction of Regulatory T Cells. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol (2019) 188:103–10. doi: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2018.12.013
138
PennaGRoncariAAmuchasteguiSDanielKCBertiEColonnaMet al. Expression of the Inhibitory Receptor ILT3 on Dendritic Cells is Dispensable for Induction of CD4+Foxp3+ Regulatory T Cells by 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3. Blood (2005) 106(10):3490–7. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-05-2044
139
FariasASSpagnolGSBordeaux-RegoPOliveiraCOFontanaAGde PaulaRFet al. Vitamin D3 Induces IDO+ Tolerogenic DCs and Enhances Treg, Reducing the Severity of EAE. CNS Neurosci Ther (2013) 19(4):269–77. doi: 10.1111/cns.12071
140
Navarro-BarriusoJMansillaMJQuirant-SánchezBArdiaca-MartínezATeniente-SerraAPresas-RodríguezSet al. MAP7 and MUCL1 are Biomarkers of Vitamin D3-Induced Tolerogenic Dendritic Cells in Multiple Sclerosis Patients. Front Immunol (2019) 10:1251. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01251
141
DivitoSJWangZShufeskyWJLiuQTkachevaOAMontecalvoAet al. Endogenous Dendritic Cells Mediate the Effects of Intravenously Injected Therapeutic Immunosuppressive Dendritic Cells in Transplantation. Blood (2010) 116(15):2694–705. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-10-251058
142
KennaTJThomasRSteptoeRJ. Steady-State Dendritic Cells Expressing Cognate Antigen Terminate Memory CD8+ T-Cell Responses. Blood (2008) 111(4):2091–100. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-07-103200
143
KennaTJWaldieTMcNallyAThomsonMYagitaHThomasRet al. Targeting Antigen to Diverse APCs Inactivates Memory CD8+ T Cells Without Eliciting Tissue-Destructive Effector Function. J Immunol (2010) 184(2):598–606. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0900032
144
NasreenMWaldieTMDixonCMSteptoeRJ. Steady-State Antigen-Expressing Dendritic Cells Terminate CD4+ Memory T-cell Responses. Eur J Immunol (2010) 40(7):2016–25. doi: 10.1002/eji.200940085
145
KleijwegtFSJansenDTSLTeelerJJoostenAMLabanSNikolicTet al. Tolerogenic Dendritic Cells Impede Priming of Naïve CD8+ T Cells and Deplete Memory CD8+ T Cells. Eur J Immunol (2013) 43(1):85–92. doi: 10.1002/eji.201242879
146
KwanTChadbanSJMaJBaoSAlexanderSIWuH. Il-17 Deficiency Attenuates Allograft Injury and Prolongs Survival in a Murine Model of Fully MHC-mismatched Renal Allograft Transplantation. Am J Transplant (2015) 15(6):1555–67. doi: 10.1111/ajt.13140
147
ZahorchakAFKeanLSTokitaDTurnquistHRAbeMFinkeJet al. Infusion of Stably Immature Monocyte-Derived Dendritic Cells Plus CTLA4Ig Modulates Alloimmune Reactivity in Rhesus Macaques. Transplantation (2007) 84(2):196–206. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000268582.21168.f6
148
MorelliAEThomsonAW. Orchestration of Transplantation Tolerance by Regulatory Dendritic Cell Therapy or in-Situ Targeting of Dendritic Cells. Curr Opin Organ Transplant (2014) 19(4):348–56. doi: 10.1097/MOT.0000000000000097
149
RogersNMIsenbergJSThomsonAW. Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cells: No Longer an Enigma and Now Key to Transplant Tolerance? Am J Transplant (2013) 13(5):1125–33. doi: 10.1111/ajt.12229
150
BonifazLBonnyayDMahnkeKRiveraMNussenzweigMCSteinmanRM. Efficient Targeting of Protein Antigen to the Dendritic Cell Receptor DEC-205 in the Steady State Leads to Antigen Presentation on Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I Products and Peripheral CD8+ T Cell Tolerance. J Exp Med (2002) 196(12):1627–38. doi: 10.1084/jem.20021598
151
JungKCParkCGJeonYKParkHJBanYLMinHSet al. In Situ Induction of Dendritic Cell-Based T Cell Tolerance in Humanized Mice and Nonhuman Primates. J Exp Med (2011) 208(12):2477–88. doi: 10.1084/jem.20111242
152
LiDRomainGFlamarALDulucDDullaersMLiXHet al. Targeting Self- and Foreign Antigens to Dendritic Cells Via DC-ASGPR Generates IL-10-producing Suppressive CD4+ T Cells. J Exp Med (2012) 209(1):109–21. doi: 10.1084/jem.20110399
153
PhillipsBEGarciafigueroaYTruccoMGiannoukakisN. Clinical Tolerogenic Dendritic Cells: Exploring Therapeutic Impact on Human Autoimmune Disease. Front Immunol (2017) 8:1279. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01279
154
WangZDivitoSJShufeskyWJSumpterTWangHTkachevaOAet al. Dendritic Cell Therapies in Transplantation Revisited: Deletion of Recipient DCs Deters the Effect of Therapeutic Dcs. Am J Transplant (2012) 12(6):1398–408. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2012.04060.x
155
BoksMAKager-GroenlandJRHaasjesMSZwagingaJJvan HamSMten BrinkeA. Il-10-generated Tolerogenic Dendritic Cells are Optimal for Functional Regulatory T Cell Induction–a Comparative Study of Human Clinical-Applicable DC. Clin Immunol (2012) 142(3):332–42. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2011.11.011
156
ComiMAmodioGGregoriS. Interleukin-10-Producing DC-10 is a Unique Tool to Promote Tolerance Via Antigen-Specific T Regulatory Type 1 Cells. Front Immunol (2018) 9:682. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00682
157
KryczanowskyFRakerVGraulichEDomogallaMPSteinbrinkK. Il-10-Modulated Human Dendritic Cells for Clinical Use: Identification of a Stable and Migratory Subset With Improved Tolerogenic Activity. J Immunol (2016) 197(9):3607–17. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1501769
158
SongSYuanPWuHChenJFuJLiPet al. Dendritic Cells With an Increased PD-L1 by TGF-β Induce T Cell Anergy for the Cytotoxicity of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells. Int Immunopharmacol (2014) 20(1):117–23. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2014.02.027
159
QianCQianLYuYAnHGuoZHanYet al. Fas Signal Promotes the Immunosuppressive Function of Regulatory Dendritic Cells Via the ERK/β-Catenin Pathway. J Biol Chem (2013) 288(39):27825–35. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.425751
160
LopesDMOliveiraSCPageBCarvalhoLPCarvalhoEMCardosoLS. Schistosoma Mansoni Rsm29 Antigen Induces a Regulatory Phenotype on Dendritic Cells and Lymphocytes From Patients With Cutaneous Leishmaniasis. Front Immunol (2018) 9:3122. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.03122
161
LuanYYZhangLZhuFJDongNLuJYYaoYM. Effect of TIPE1 on Immune Function of Dendritic Cells and Its Signaling Pathway in Septic Mice. J Infect Dis (2019) 220(4):699–709. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiz158
162
XuYTangXYangMZhangSLiSChenYet al. Interleukin 10 Gene-Modified Bone Marrow-Derived Dendritic Cells Attenuate Liver Fibrosis in Mice by Inducing Regulatory T Cells and Inhibiting the TGF-β/Smad Signaling Pathway. Mediators Inflammation (2019) 2019:4652596. doi: 10.1155/2019/4652596
163
LanZGeWArpJJiangJFLiuWHGordonDet al. Induction of Kidney Allograft Tolerance by Soluble Cd83 Associated With Prevalence of Tolerogenic Dendritic Cells and Indoleamine 2,3-Dioxygenase. Transplantation (2010) 90(12):1286–93. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3182007bbf
164
TrabanelliSLeccisoMSalvestriniVCavoMOčadlíkováDLemoliRMet al. PGE2-Induced IDO1 Inhibits the Capacity of Fully Mature DCs to Elicit an In Vitro Antileukemic Immune Response. J Immunol Res (2015) 2015:253191. doi: 10.1155/2015/253191
165
Flórez-GrauGCabezónRBorgmanKJEEspañaCLozanoJJGarcia-ParajoMFet al. Up-Regulation of EP(2) and EP(3) Receptors in Human Tolerogenic Dendritic Cells Boosts the Immunosuppressive Activity of PGE(2). J Leukoc Biol (2017) 102(3):881–95. doi: 10.1189/jlb.2A1216-526R
166
TurnquistHRRaimondiGZahorchakAFFischerRTWangZThomsonAW. Rapamycin-Conditioned Dendritic Cells are Poor Stimulators of Allogeneic CD4+ T Cells, But Enrich for Antigen-Specific Foxp3+ T Regulatory Cells and Promote Organ Transplant Tolerance. J Immunol (2007) 178(11):7018–31. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.178.11.7018
167
Campos-AcuñaJPérezFNarváezECampos-MoraMGajardoTCatalánDet al. Rapamycin-Conditioned Dendritic Cells Activated With Monophosphoryl Lipid-a Promote Allograft Acceptance In Vivo. Immunotherapy (2015) 7(2):101–10. doi: 10.2217/imt.14.116
168
KimSHMoonJHJeongSUJungHHParkCSHwangBYet al. Induction of Antigen-Specific Immune Tolerance Using Biodegradable Nanoparticles Containing Antigen and Dexamethasone. Int J Nanomed (2019) 14:5229–42. doi: 10.2147/ijn.S210546
169
Jauregui-AmezagaACabezónRRamírez-MorrosAEspañaCRimolaJBruCet al. Intraperitoneal Administration of Autologous Tolerogenic Dendritic Cells for Refractory Crohn’s Disease: A Phase I Study. J Crohns Colitis (2015) 9(12):1071–8. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjv144
170
BellGMAndersonAEDibollJReeceREltheringtonOHarryRAet al. Autologous Tolerogenic Dendritic Cells for Rheumatoid and Inflammatory Arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis (2017) 76(1):227–34. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-208456
171
HarryRAAndersonAEIsaacsJDHilkensCM. Generation and Characterisation of Therapeutic Tolerogenic Dendritic Cells for Rheumatoid Arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis (2010) 69(11):2042–50. doi: 10.1136/ard.2009.126383
172
ZhangMZhengYSunYLiSChenLJinXet al. Knockdown of NEAT1 Induces Tolerogenic Phenotype in Dendritic Cells by Inhibiting Activation of NLRP3 Inflammasome. Theranostics (2019) 9(12):3425–42. doi: 10.7150/thno.33178
173
WuJZhangHZhengYJinXLiuMLiSet al. The Long Noncoding RNA Malat1 Induces Tolerogenic Dendritic Cells and Regulatory T Cells Via Mir155/Dendritic Cell-Specific Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-3 Grabbing Nonintegrin/Il10 Axis. Front Immunol (2018) 9:1847. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01847
174
ZhangXLiMLianDZhengXZhangZXIchimTEet al. Generation of Therapeutic Dendritic Cells and Regulatory T Cells for Preventing Allogeneic Cardiac Graft Rejection. Clin Immunol (2008) 127(3):313–21. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2008.01.013
175
PearceELPearceEJ. Metabolic Pathways in Immune Cell Activation and Quiescence. Immunity (2013) 38(4):633–43. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.04.005
176
ThwePMPelgromLRCooperRBeauchampSReiszJAD’AlessandroAet al. Cell-Intrinsic Glycogen Metabolism Supports Early Glycolytic Reprogramming Required for Dendritic Cell Immune Responses. Cell Metab (2017) 26(3):558–67.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2017.08.012
177
GuakHAl HabyanSMaEHAldossaryHAl-MasriMWonSYet al. Glycolytic Metabolism is Essential for CCR7 Oligomerization and Dendritic Cell Migration. Nat Commun (2018) 9(1):2463. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04804-6
178
EvertsBAmielEHuangSCSmithAMChangCHLamWYet al. TLR-Driven Early Glycolytic Reprogramming Via the Kinases TBK1-IKKε Supports the Anabolic Demands of Dendritic Cell Activation. Nat Immunol (2014) 15(4):323–32. doi: 10.1038/ni.2833
179
GotohKMorisakiTSetoyamaDSasakiKYagiMIgamiKet al. Mitochondrial P32/C1qbp Is a Critical Regulator of Dendritic Cell Metabolism and Maturation. Cell Rep (2018) 25(7):1800–15.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.10.057
180
HoltzhausenAZhaoFEvansKSTsutsuiMOrabonaCTylerDSet al. Melanoma-Derived Wnt5a Promotes Local Dendritic-Cell Expression of IDO and Immunotolerance: Opportunities for Pharmacologic Enhancement of Immunotherapy. Cancer Immunol Res (2015) 3(9):1082–95. doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.Cir-14-0167
181
FerreiraGBVanherwegenASEelenGGutiérrezACFVan LommelLMarchalKet al. Vitamin D3 Induces Tolerance in Human Dendritic Cells by Activation of Intracellular Metabolic Pathways. Cell Rep (2015) 10(5):711–25. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.01.013
182
EvertsBAmielEvan der WindtGJFreitasTCChottRYarasheskiKEet al. Commitment to Glycolysis Sustains Survival of NO-producing Inflammatory Dendritic Cells. Blood (2012) 120(7):1422–31. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-03-419747
183
WeiHJGuptaAKaoWMAlmudallalOLetterioJJPareekTK. Nrf2-mediated Metabolic Reprogramming of Tolerogenic Dendritic Cells is Protective Against Aplastic Anemia. J Autoimmun (2018) 94:33–44. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2018.07.005
184
SunYOravecz-WilsonKBridgesSMcEachinRWuJKimSHet al. miR-142 Controls Metabolic Reprogramming That Regulates Dendritic Cell Activation. J Clin Invest (2019) 129(5):2029–42. doi: 10.1172/jci123839
185
MogilenkoDAHaasJTL’HommeLFleurySQuemenerSLevavasseurMet al. Metabolic and Innate Immune Cues Merge Into a Specific Inflammatory Response Via the UPR. Cell (2019) 177(5):1201–16.e19. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.03.018
186
RomeroMMDuarteAPastoriniMAlemánM. Role of α-Glucan-Induced Oxygen Species in Dendritic Cells and its Impact in Immune Response Against Tuberculosis. Int J Med Microbiol (2019) 309(6):151328. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2019.07.002
187
OberkampfMGuillereyCMourièsJRosenbaumPFayolleCBobardAet al. Mitochondrial Reactive Oxygen Species Regulate the Induction of CD8(+) T Cells by Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cells. Nat Commun (2018) 9(1):2241. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04686-8
188
WoltmanAMvan der KooijSWCofferPJOffringaRDahaMRvan KootenC. Rapamycin Specifically Interferes With GM-CSF Signaling in Human Dendritic Cells, Leading to Apoptosis Via Increased p27KIP1 Expression. Blood (2003) 101(4):1439–45. doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-06-1688
189
PerlA. mTOR Activation is a Biomarker and a Central Pathway to Autoimmune Disorders, Cancer, Obesity, and Aging. Ann N Y Acad Sci (2015) 1346(1):33–44. doi: 10.1111/nyas.12756
190
TomićSJanjetovićKMihajlovićDMilenkovićMKravić-StevovićTMarkovićZet al. Graphene Quantum Dots Suppress Proinflammatory T Cell Responses Via Autophagy-Dependent Induction of Tolerogenic Dendritic Cells. Biomaterials (2017) 146:13–28. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.08.040
191
WatsonARDaiHZhengYNakanoRGiannouADMenkAVet al. Mtorc2 Deficiency Alters the Metabolic Profile of Conventional Dendritic Cells. Front Immunol (2019) 10:1451. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01451
192
LiuYTongLLuoYLiXChenGWangY. Resveratrol Inhibits the Proliferation and Induces the Apoptosis in Ovarian Cancer Cells Via Inhibiting Glycolysis and Targeting AMPK/mTOR Signaling Pathway. J Cell Biochem (2018) 119(7):6162–72. doi: 10.1002/jcb.26822
193
WculekSKKhouiliSCPriegoEHeras-MurilloISanchoD. Metabolic Control of Dendritic Cell Functions: Digesting Information. Front Immunol (2019) 10:775. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00775
194
KellyBO’NeillLA. Metabolic Reprogramming in Macrophages and Dendritic Cells in Innate Immunity. Cell Res (2015) 25(7):771–84. doi: 10.1038/cr.2015.68
195
BhandariTOlsonJJohnsonRSNizetV. Hif-1α Influences Myeloid Cell Antigen Presentation and Response to Subcutaneous OVA Vaccination. J Mol Med (Berl) (2013) 91(10):1199–205. doi: 10.1007/s00109-013-1052-y
196
ThwePMFritzDISnyderJPSmithPRCurtisKDO’DonnellAet al. Syk-Dependent Glycolytic Reprogramming in Dendritic Cells Regulates IL-1β Production to β-Glucan Ligands in a TLR-independent Manner. J Leukoc Biol (2019) 106(6):1325–35. doi: 10.1002/jlb.3a0819-207rr
197
BodeKBujupiFLinkCHeinTZimmermannSPeirisDet al. Dectin-1 Binding to Annexins on Apoptotic Cells Induces Peripheral Immune Tolerance Via NADPH Oxidase-2. Cell Rep (2019) 29(13):4435–46.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.11.086
198
MitchellSVargasJHoffmannA. Signaling Via the Nfκb System. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med (2016) 8(3):227–41. doi: 10.1002/wsbm.1331
199
RescignoMMartinoMSutherlandCLGoldMRRicciardi-CastagnoliP. Dendritic Cell Survival and Maturation are Regulated by Different Signaling Pathways. J Exp Med (1998) 188(11):2175–80. doi: 10.1084/jem.188.11.2175
200
JacksonSHYuCRMahdiRMEbongSEgwuaguCE. Dendritic Cell Maturation Requires STAT1 and is Under Feedback Regulation by Suppressors of Cytokine Signaling. J Immunol (2004) 172(4):2307–15. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.172.4.2307
201
XuLZhangYTianKChenXZhangRMuXet al. Apigenin Suppresses PD-L1 Expression in Melanoma and Host Dendritic Cells to Elicit Synergistic Therapeutic Effects. J Exp Clin Cancer Res (2018) 37(1):261. doi: 10.1186/s13046-018-0929-6
202
ZhuJYaoKGuoJShiHMaLWangQet al. miR-181a and miR-150 Regulate Dendritic Cell Immune Inflammatory Responses and Cardiomyocyte Apoptosis Via Targeting JAK1-STAT1/c-Fos Pathway. J Cell Mol Med (2017) 21(11):2884–95. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.13201
203
XuJLeeMHChakhtouraMGreenBLKotredesKPChainRWet al. Stat2 Is Required for TLR-Induced Murine Dendritic Cell Activation and Cross-Presentation. J Immunol (2016) 197(1):326–36. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1500152
204
MelilloJASongLBhagatGBlazquezABPlumleeCRLeeCet al. Dendritic Cell (DC)-Specific Targeting Reveals Stat3 as a Negative Regulator of DC Function. J Immunol (2010) 184(5):2638–45. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0902960
205
BazhinAVvon AhnKFritzJWernerJKarakhanovaS. Interferon-α Up-Regulates the Expression of PD-L1 Molecules on Immune Cells Through STAT3 and p38 Signaling. Front Immunol (2018) 9:2129. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02129
206
TonioloPALiuSYehJEMoraes-VieiraPMWalkerSRVafaizadehVet al. Inhibiting STAT5 by the BET Bromodomain Inhibitor JQ1 Disrupts Human Dendritic Cell Maturation. J Immunol (2015) 194(7):3180–90. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1401635
207
ZhuHCQiuTLiuXHDongWCWengXDHuCHet al. Tolerogenic Dendritic Cells Generated by RelB Silencing Using shRNA Prevent Acute Rejection. Cell Immunol (2012) 274(1-2):12–8. doi: 10.1016/j.cellimm.2012.02.012
208
BenhamHNelHJLawSCMehdiAMStreetSRamnoruthNet al. Citrullinated Peptide Dendritic Cell Immunotherapy in HLA Risk Genotype-Positive Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients. Sci Transl Med (2015) 7(290):290ra87. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaa9301
Summary
Keywords
dendritic cells, renal transplantation, rejection, tolerance, ischemic–reperfusion injury
Citation
Lin J, Wang H, Liu C, Cheng A, Deng Q, Zhu H and Chen J (2021) Dendritic Cells: Versatile Players in Renal Transplantation. Front. Immunol. 12:654540. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.654540
Received
16 January 2021
Accepted
22 April 2021
Published
19 May 2021
Volume
12 - 2021
Edited by
Cheng Yang, Fudan University, China
Reviewed by
Helong Dai, Central South University, China; Qi Cao, Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Australia
Updates
Copyright
© 2021 Lin, Wang, Liu, Cheng, Deng, Zhu and Chen.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Jianghua Chen, chenjianghua@zju.edu.cn
†These authors have contributed equally to this work
This article was submitted to Alloimmunity and Transplantation, a section of the journal Frontiers in Immunology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.