SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Immunol., 27 May 2021

Sec. Autoimmune and Autoinflammatory Disorders

Volume 12 - 2021 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.674343

Association of Circulating Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Levels With Autoimmune Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

  • 1. Department of Clinical Laboratory, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China

  • 2. Department, State Key Laboratory of Complex, Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China

Abstract

Background:

Autoimmune diseases (ADs) are characterized by immune-mediated tissue damage, in which angiogenesis is a prominent pathogenic mechanism. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), an angiogenesis modulator, is significantly elevated in several ADs including rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic sclerosis (SSc), and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). We determined whether circulating VEGF levels were associated with ADs based on pooled evidence.

Methods:

The analyses included 165 studies from the PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases and fulfilled the study criteria. Comparisons of circulating VEGF levels between patients with ADs and healthy controls were performed by determining pooled standard mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) in a random-effect model using STATA 16.0. Subgroup, sensitivity, and meta-regression analyses were performed to determine heterogeneity and to test robustness.

Results:

Compared with healthy subjects, circulating VEGF levels were significantly higher in patients with SLE (SMD 0.84, 95% CI 0.25–1.44, P = 0.0056), RA (SMD 1.48, 95% CI 0.82–2.15, P <0.0001), SSc (SMD 0.56, 95% CI 0.36–0.75, P <0.0001), Behcet’s disease (SMD 1.65, 95% CI 0.88–2.41, P <0.0001), Kawasaki disease (SMD 2.41, 95% CI 0.10–4.72, P = 0.0406), ankylosing spondylitis (SMD 0.78, 95% CI 0.23–1.33, P = 0.0052), inflammatory bowel disease (SMD 0.57, 95% CI 0.43–0.71, P <0.0001), psoriasis (SMD 0.98, 95% CI 0.62–1.34, P <0.0001), and Graves’ disease (SMD 0.69, 95% CI 0.20–1.19, P = 0.0056). Circulating VEGF levels correlated with disease activity and hematological parameters in ADs.

Conclusion:

Circulating VEGF levels were associated with ADs and could predict disease manifestations, severity and activity in patients with ADs.

Systematic Review Registration:

PROSPERO, identifier CRD42021227843.

Introduction

Angiogenesis, a hallmark of inflammatory activation, is an integral part of pathogenic processes including endothelial cell proliferation and migration and subsequent neoangiogenesis and remodeling in autoimmune diseases (ADs). Synovial pannus initiates the invasion of cartilage and subchondral bone to perpetuate rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (1, 2), whereas ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is characterized by increased vascularity and vascular lesions (3). Vascular endothelial dysfunction and injury are considered as the primum movens triggering Kawasaki disease (KD), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), Behcet’s disease (BD), systemic sclerosis (SSc), and psoriasis (PsA) (49). Therefore, early detection of vascular involvement is pivotal in AD diagnosis.

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-A, generally known as VEGF, is a crucial regulator of endothelial dysfunction, capillary permeability, and angiogenesis. For example, serum VEGF level and intrathyroid microvessel density were reported to be increased patients with Graves’ disease (GD) compared to healthy control (HC) subjects (10). Increased serum VEGF and significant difference in diffused and limited SSc suggest VEGF as a potential surrogate indicator of capillary damage (11). Strong VEGF expression in synovial fluid and serum of patients with RA was shown to lead to synovial neovascularization and destruction in cartilage and bones (12, 13). VEGF was reported to be overexpressed in the skin and peripheral blood of patients with PsA (14). Serum VEGF levels were shown to be elevated and to correlate with disease activity and severity in PsA, SLE, BD, IBD, KD, and AS (1419). These findings suggest VEGF as a potential pathogenic factor with promising diagnostic value in ADs. However, no clinical guidelines currently recommend serum VEGF evaluation in routine care and counseling of patients with ADs, and intensive studies are warranted to identify the clinical implications of the findings regarding VEGF’s role in ADs to date and to resolve contradictory results (2024).

Given the inconsistency among these findings and lower statistic power of the studies, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to generate independent results and recognize the source of heterogeneity. In the present study, we aimed to determine whether circulating VEGF was a causative factor in ADs.

Materials and Methods

Literature Search

The present systematic review with meta-analysis was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO registration number, CRD42021227843). Two authors (HTZ and HLL) independently searched the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and the Web of Science databases for studies published until October 14. The detailed search strategies are provided in the online Supplemental Materials. Reference lists were manually retrieved.

Eligibility Criteria

Without restrictions on time, language, ethnicity, and geographical region, studies satisfying the following criteria were included: (1) case-control or cohort studies on the association between circulating VEGF and ADs including SLE, RA, SSc, BD, KD, AS, IBD, PsA, and GD; (2) HCs without ADs (2); available data on circulating VEGF levels (serum or plasma); (3) sufficient data on VEGF levels for both HCs and patients with ADs to evaluate standard mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Studies based on animal and cellular models, those comprising HCs with insufficient data; and editorial letters with insufficient data were excluded.

Data Extraction and Quality Assessment

Two independent investigators (HTZ and HLL) individually screened the literature and extracted and evaluated the data. Any discrepancies were resolved by consensus or by a third opinion (YZL). Study number, name of the first author, publication year, country, study type, sample type, inclusion and exclusion criteria, demographic features, aggregated number of subjects and circulating VEGF levels in patients with ADs and HCs, diagnostic criteria, type of VEGF assay, and treatment history and strategy were extracted into pre-designed charts. For meta-analysis, continuous variables were translated from medians (interquartile range [IQR] or range) to means ± standard deviation (25). Newcastle–Ottawa quality assessment scale was used to evaluate study quality. Further details of the pooled studies were obtained by directly contacting the authors if warranted.

Data Analysis

STATA V.16.0 was used to perform the meta-analysis. SMDs with 95% CIs were used to estimate the pooled results and compare circulating VEGF levels between patients and HC groups. Random-effect model was used for analysis. Significant heterogeneity was ascertained based on a p value of ≤0.10 using the Cochrane Q test or an I2 value of >50%. Subgroup, sensitivity, and meta-regression analyses were performed to identify the source of heterogeneity and to test robustness. Spearman correlation coefficients were transformed into Pearson’s r values, which were converted to Fisher’s z values to obtain approximately normal distributions. Ultimately, the summary Fisher’s z values were converted into summary r values. Summary r values of 0.8–1.0, 0.6–0.8, 0.4–0.6, and 0.2–0.4 indicated extreme, high, and moderate relevance and poor correlation, respectively (details provided in the online Supplemental Materials). Publication bias was assessed by Egger’s linear regression test and contour-enhanced funnel plots with collaborative meta-trim. A two-sided P <0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.

Results

Search Results and Population Characteristics

The literature search is summarized in Figure 1. After removing duplicate studies (n = 3,322) and irrelevant publications (n = 8,673), 298 articles were analyzed and the full texts of 273 articles were read. Thirty-two full-text articles were eliminated due to incomplete data or unrelated outcomes. Among 241 eligible studies meeting the inclusion criteria, 76 articles were excluded due to unextractable data, insufficient data on HCs, irrelevant VEGF sample type (urine/synovial fluid/tear fluid), or inappropriate disease control groups. Finally, 165 studies were included in the meta-analysis, with 28, 29, 40, 13, 8, 12, 16, 23, and six studies on SLE (20, 21, 2651), RA (12, 2224, 38, 43, 5274), SSc (11, 38, 39, 64, 75110), BD (111123), KD (18, 124130), AS (55, 73, 131140), IBD (141156), PsA (12, 14, 135, 136, 157175) and GD (10, 176180), respectively. The main study characteristics are summarized in Table 1 and Appendix 1. The studies were medium-to-high quality based on the Newcastle–Ottawa quality assessment scale scores (range, 4–9).

Figure 1

Table 1

YearAuthorCountryStudy typeSLEHC
Sample sizeFemale (%)Age (years)Sample sizeFemale (%)Age (years)
2015Barbulescu AL (20)Romaniacase-control1816 (88.88)45.00 ± 10.811716 (94.11)range: 19–64
2019Barraclough M (21)UKcase-control3634 (94)40 ± 12.413030 (100)32 ± 14.44
2008Ciprandi G (26)Italycase-control4040 (100)41.95 ± 8.34033 (82.5)43 ± 8.2
2009Colombo BM (27)Italycase-control8080 (100)42.6 ± 9.18080 (100)40.1 ± 9.5
2014De Jesus GR (28)Brazilcase-control5454 (100)3434 (100)
2015Ding Y (29)Chinacase-control4130 (73.2)11.1 ± 2.410
2009Elhelaly NS (30)Egyptcase-control2321 (91.3)Range 8–1825
2012Edelbauer M (31)Austriacase-control2317 (73.9)15 ± 5205 (25)12 ± 3
2018El-Gazzar II (32)Egyptcase-control8484 (100)29.03 ± 5.433
2017Ghazali WSW (33)Malaysiacase-control922626 (100)33.19 ± 10.3
LN 4644 (96)28.48 ± 9.93
Non-LN 4646 (100)32.39 ± 11.46
2007Heshmat NM (34)Egyptcase-control2524 (96)14.1 ± 2.63029 (96.7)14.0 ± 2.5
2009Hrycek A (35)Polandcase-control4848 (100)47 ± 142424 (100)51 ± 15
2009Hrycek A (36)Polandcase-control2121 (100)51 ± 12.42424 (100)51 ± 15.3
2008Ibrahim FF (37)Egyptcase-control3030 (100)25 ± 7.751010 (100)32 ± 7.5
1998Kikuchi K (38)Japancase-control1714 (82.4)47 ± 12.752016 (80%)50 ± 12.5
2013Koca SS (39)Turkeycase-control2321 (91.3)37.9 ± 9.32822 (78.6%)42.5 ± 13.9
2007Kuryliszyn-Moskal A (40)Polandcase-control4744 (93.6)40.8 ± 13.630
2014Liu J (41)Chinacase-control7559 (78.7)35.42 ± 11.794031 (77.5)33.62 ± 10.21
2018Merayo-Chalico J (42)Mexicocase-controlactive SLE 66 (100)34.6 ± 4.266 (100)36 ± 4.1
remission SLE 66 (100)34.1 ± 4.8
2016Novikov A (43)Russiacase-control8072 (90)31.5 ± 36.328
2012Moneib HA (44)Egyptcase-control3021 (70)28.9 ± 10.21510 (66)35.00 ± 9.48
2002Navarro C (45)Mexicocase-control2824 (85.7)36.6± 16.12419 (79.2)29.2 ± 8.5
2005Robak E (46)Polandcase-control4138 (92.7)40.5 ± 13.520
2003Robak E (47)Polandcase-control6055 (91.7)41 ± 14.252017 (85)45 ± 5.75
2013Robak E (48)Polandcase-control6056 (93.3)39.2 ± 11.252017 (85)
2002Robak E (49)Polandcase-control5248 (92.3)41 ± 14.752018 (90)38 ± 11.75
2017Willis R (50)Americacase-control3123083.343.5 ± 12.5
cohort1267252 (94.4)47.6 ± 12.4
cohort24544 (97.8)44.0 ± 12.1
2014Zhou L (51)Chinacase-control5450 (92.6)36.81 ± 12.522822 (78.6)37.82 ± 12.86
YearAuthorCountryStudy typeRAHC
Sample sizeFemale (%)Age (years)Sample sizeFemale (%)Age (years)
2004Ardicoglu O (52)case-conrol3840
2001Ballara S (12)UKcohortearly 446161 ± 17.78316549 ± 12.59
longstanding 788561 ± 14.07
2000Bottomley MJ (53)UKcase-conrol6151 (83.6)59 ± 11.752920 (69.0)34 ± 8
2005Kim HR (62)Koreacase-conrol3024 (80)50 ± 82016 (80)30 ± 8
2016Deveci K (55)Turkeycase-control30mean age of 30–5030mean age of 30–50
2002Drouart M (56)Francecase-control5032 (64)59.8 ± 12.86430 (46.9)42.1 ± 10.1
2016do Prado AD (57)Brazilcase-control6450 (78.1)55.3 ± 9.83023 (76.7)55.9 ± 11.1
2009Foster W (22)UKcase-control6641 (62.1)58 ± 144934 (69.4)54 ± 10
2018Gumus A (58)Turkeycase-control592520  (80.0)46.4 ± 13.3
joint swelling (+) 3127 (87.10)45.06 ± 9.66
joint swelling (−) 2825 (89.28)45.10  ± 13.03
2014Heard BJ (59)Canadacase-control10046.5 ± 14.510040.0 + 9.5
2008Hetland ML (60)Denmarkcase-control1010
2003Hashimoto N (61)Japancase-controlactive RA2218 (81.8)54 ± 12.7511
1998Kikuchi K (38)Japancase-control1110 (90.9)51 ± 10.752016 (80)50 ± 12.5
2007Cho ML (54)Koreacase-control7249.6 ± 1.33147.1 ± 2.1
2006Kuryliszyn-Moskal A (63)Polandcase-control6454 (84.4)58.6 ± 12.632
2004Kuwana M (64)Japancase-control1111 (100)59.1 ± 12.01111 (100)52.7 ± 10.6
2010Milman N (65)Canadacase-control4778.7054.3 ± 14.25
2018Misra S (23)Indiacase-control5046 (92)35.90 ± 18.6073028 (93.3)34.03 ± 10.3
2016Novikov A (43)Russiacase-control7459 (79.7)54.0 ± 13.33
2001Olszewski WL (66)Polandcase-control2016 (80)42 ± 7.52025 ± 1
2012Oranskiy SP (67)Russiacase-control39 (BMI normal)82.053.0 ± 2.752080.052.0 ± 2.5
2010Ozgonenel L (68)Turkeycase-control4032 (80)46 ± 12.593818 (47.4)44 ± 11.11
2009Young HR (69)Americacase-control16969.2054.2 ± 11.8926353.2 ± 11.6
2016Rodriguez-Carrio J (70)Spaincase-control212175 (82.5)54 ± 17.25175102 (58.3)51 ± 14.25
2016Smets P (71)Francecase-control80:RA138 (61.5)71 ± 7.973724 (64.9)73.35 ± 8.55
2004Strunk J (72)Germanycase-controlactive RA 2116 (76.2)range: 38–79126 (50)range: 17–58
2010Tseng JC (73)Chinacase-control5050
2001Sone H (24)Japancase-control155130 (83.9)57.9 ± 12.07562 (82.7)55.8 ± 15.4
2007Zayed A (74)Egyptcase-control40range:21–5720
YearAuthorCountryStudy typeSScHC
Sample sizeFemale (%)Age (years)Sample sizeFemale (%)Age (years)
2018Alekperov R (75)Russiacase-control4620
2004Allanore Y (76)Francecase-control4033 (82.5)57 ± 122017 (85)51 ± 7
2013Aydogdu E (77)Turkeycase-control4038 (95)48.35 ± 13.22019 (95)49.3 ± 8.5
2017Benyamine A (78)Francecase-control4544 (97.8)61.49 ± 11.954138 (92.7)56.09 ± 7.82
2014Bosello SL (79)Italycase-control2811
2014Bosello SL (80)Italycase-control2410
2002Choi JJ (11)Koreacase-control4845 (81.8)40.6 ± 13553038 ± 6
2017Chora I (81)Italycase-control5549 (89.0)64 ± 115551 (92.7)52 ± 10.25
VEDOSS 2521 (84.0)50 ± 14.5
2016Cossu M (82)Italycase-controlUCTD/SSC 4752.7 ± 14.243
SSc without skin fibrisis 4862 ± 13.2
limited 5162.1 ± 10.4
diffused 3554.6 ± 12.6
2013De Lauretis A (83)UKcase-control7459 (79.7)51.4 ± 12.1207 (35)32.7 ± 6.3
2017Delle Sedie A (84)Italycase-control4140 (97.6)56 ± 153125 (80.6)50 ± 16
2011Distler JHW (85)Germanycase-control4034 (85)46 ± 14.56644 (66.7)39 ± 13.75
2002Distler O (86)Italycase-control4335 (81.4)61 ± 13.752116 (76.2)55 ± 16.75
2012Dunne JV (87)Canadacase-control4035 (87.5)40
diffused 1445.5 ± 9.5
limited 2653.8 ± 13.25
2005Dziankowska-Bartkowiak B (88)Polandcase-control3426 (76.5)48 ± 13.52019 (95.0)46 ± 9.75
diffused 158 (53.3)45 ± 12
limited 1918 (94.7)50 ± 10.75
2006Dziankowska-Bartkowiak B (89)Polandcase-control2822 (78.6)47.5 ± 132015 (75)46 ± 9.75
diffused 127 (58.3)48 ± 11.5
limited 1615 (93.8)47 ± 10.75
2013Farouk HM (90)Egyptcase-control2521 (84)40.3 ± 5.862017 (85)38.9 ± 3.8
2014Gkodkowska-Mrowka E (91)Polandcase-control6660 (90)53 ± 13.252118 (85.7)52 ± 10.25
2018Gigante A (92)Italycase-control1515 (100)41 ± 10.8351039 ± 10.484
2008Hummers LK (93)Americacase-control11388.9053.0 ± 12.2276357.5 ± 2.8
2017Ibrahim SE (94)Egyptcase-control3533 (94.2)30.43 ± 4.533529.8 ± 4.03
2018Kawashiri S (95)Japancase-control6056 (93.3)64 ± 8.88925
diffused 1615 (93.8)64 ± 6.667
limitted 4441 (93.2)64 ± 10.37
1998Kikuchi K (38)Japancase-control4037 (92.5)53 ± 16.252016 (80)50 ± 12.5
2004Kuryliszyn-Moskal A (96)Polandcase-control3131 (100)55.2 ± 10.430
2013Koca SS (39)Turkeycase-control3732 (86.5)45.7 ± 13.62822 (78.6)42.5 ± 13.9
2020Lv TT (97)Chinacase-control3018 (75)44 ± 12.015
2004Kuwana M (64)Japancase-control1111 (100)57.7 ± 11.81111 (100)52.7 ± 10.6
2019Michalska-Jakubus M (98)Polandcase-control4747 (100)56.43 ± 11.012727 (100)52.37 ± 8.87
2010Minier T (99)Hungarycase-control13190.8055.9 ± 11.730
diffused 4182.8052.6 ± 13.8
limited 9094.4057.4 ± 10.3
2012Morgiel E (100)Polandcase-control3026 (86.7)54 ± 10.320
2009Papaioannou AI (101)Greececase-control4033 (82.5)56.75 ± 12.513
2015Reiseter S (102)Norwaycohort298243 (82)56.0 ± 13.8100
2001Sato S (103)Japancase-control3229 (90.6)47 ± 1820
2010Riccieri V (104)Italycase-control6563 (96.9)57.3 ± 15.2516
2017Saranya C (105)Indiacase-control55median 3830median 39
2016Shenavandeh S (106)Irancase-control4440 (90.9)40.7 ± 12.84441 (93.2)39.4 ± 11.76
2009Solanilla A (107)Francecase-control3525
2016Yalcinkaya Y (108)Turkeycase-control7266 (92)44.9 ± 12.720
2020Waszczykowska APolandcase-control2521 (84)57.1 ± 10.82520 (80)59.4 ± 9.9
(109)diffused 87 (87.5)50.6 ± 11.4
limited 1714 (82.4)60.2 ± 9.4
2008Wipff J (110)Francecase-control187157 (84)55.9 ± 13.24840 (83.3)59.4 ± 11.6
YearAuthorCountryStudy typeBDHC
Sample sizeFemale (%)Age (years)Sample sizeFemale (%)Age (years)
2018Arica DA (111)Turkeycase-control4522 (48.9)36.7 ± 10.32835.7 ± 7.51
2003Cekmen M (112)Turkeycase-control3918 (46.2)38.1 ± 10.4157 (46.7)39.2 ± 9.3
2013Eldin AB (113)Egyptcase-control306 (20)30.6 ± 9.36204 (20)26.9 ± 8.38
2003Erdem F (114)Turkeycase-control3316 (48.5)33.2 ± 10.4309 (30)34.0 ± 11.1
2012Ganeb SS (115)Egyptcase-control7027 (38.6)32.84 ± 3.637029 (41.4)32.81 ± 3.89
2019Gheita TA (116)Egyptcase-control9634.9 ± 10.1609 (25)36.7 ± 12.6
active 5911 (18.6)33.03 ± 9.8
inactive 376 (16.2)36.2 ± 10.1
2011Ibrahim SE (117)Egyptcase-control408 (20)40.35 ± 7.34409 (22.5)37.3 ± 7.06
2017Kul A (118)Turkeycase-controlactive 4016 (40)37.6 ± 8.74018 (45)38.8 ± 7.9
2009Ozdamar Y (119)Turkeycase-controlactive prosterior segment of BD 207 (35)33 ± 6
inactive ocular BD 2310 (43.5)35 ± 7
2007Ozturk MA (120)Turkeycase-control216 (28.6)35.8 ± 8.621
2018Sertoglu E (121)Turkeycase-control5518 (32.7)40 ± 103112 (38.7)40 ± 13
2006Shaker O (122)Egyptcase-control302032.6 ± 9.14152030.13 ± 12.32
2013Yalcindag A (123)Turkeycase-control6532 (49)40.3 ± 9.82111 (48)38.5 ± 9.3
YearAuthorCountryStudy typeKDHC
Sample sizeFemale (%)Age (years)Sample sizeFemale (%)Age (years)
2011Breunis WB (124)Netherlandscase-controlearly10118
2001Hamamichi Y (125)Japancase-controlacute 491.9 ± 0.2384.5 ± 0.7
convalesent 304.8 ± 0.7
1998Maeno N (126)Japancase-control2210 (45.5)2.2 ± 1.425healthy 199 (47.7)1.4 ± 1.4
acute 2010 (50)1.5 ± 1.15febrile 2210 (45.5)1.3 ± 1.4
subacute 135 (38.5)2.5 ± 1.325
convalesent 158 (53.3)1.9 ± 1.4
1999Ohno T (18)Japancase-controlacute 6624 (36.4)1.79 ± 2.375healthy 188 (44.4)4.25 ± 1.75
acute phase31febrile 189 (50)3.375 ± 2.29
convalescent phase31
2002Takuro Ohno (127)Japancase-controlacute phase 4114 (34.1)1.83 ± 2.17258 (32)9 ± 1.75
convalescent phase 41
2019Su Y (128)Chinacase-control9051 (56.7)2.55 ± 1.72healthy 6028 (46.7)2.19 ± 2.22
febrile 4020 (50)2.84 ± 1.63
2009Ueno K (129)Japancase-control8037 (46.25)2.1 ± 1.8febrile 2610 (38.5)1.9 ± 1.1
2016Zeng H (130)Chinacase-control52
YearAuthorCountryStudy typeASHC
Sample sizeFemale (%)Age (years)Sample sizeFemale (%)Age (years)
2016Akar S (13)]Turkeycase-control9827.7 ± 8.649
2016Deveci K (55)Turkeycase-control30mean age of 30–5030mean age of 30–50
2002Goldberger C (132)Austriacase-control162 (12.5)50.4 ± 2.78
2015Lin TT (133)Chinacase-control140102 (72.9)31.8 ± 9.39072 (80)30.2 ± 8.2
2016Przepiera-Bedzak H (134)Polandcase-control8016 (20)50.9 ± 12.8218 (38.1)48.2 ± 13.5
2015Przepiera-Bedzak H (135)Polandcase-control6112 (19.7)43.3 ± 13.22919 (65.5)48.2 ± 13.5
2016Przepiera-Bedzak H (136)Polandcase-control8120 (24.7)44.7 ± 13.23019 (63.3)43.5 ± 9.4
2016Sakellariou GT (137)Greececase-control574 (7.0)39.1 ± 1.4342 (6.0)38.8 ± 1.0
2015Solmaz D (138)Turkeycase-control9821 (21.4)39.3 ± 10.04912 (24.5)39.0 ± 5.9
2018Solmaz D (139)Turkeycase-control9721 (21.6)38 ± 10.44812 (25)41 ± 5.0
2019Torres L (140)Swedencase-control20487 (43)49 ± 15.5680
2010Tseng JC (73)Chinacase-control5050
YearAuthorCountryStudy typeIBDHC
Sample sizeFemale (%)Age (years)Sample sizeFemale (%)Age (years)
2018Aksoy EK (141)Turkeycase-controlUC 3915 (38.5)46.1 ± 12.6157 (46.7)41.4 ± 12.6
2014Algaba A (142)Spaincase-control37 (UC = 6)20 (54)36 ± 134024 (60)43 ± 9
2004Di Sabatino A (143)Italycase-controlCD 2537.8 ± 11.252238.3 ± 11.25
2007Dueñas Pousa I (144)Spaincase-controlCD 3015 (50)44 ± 143015 (50)43 ± 14
2006Ferrante M (145)Belgiumcohort824466 (56.6)38.9 ± 12.07271156 (57.6)28 ± 10.37
1999Griga T (146)Germanycase-control27105 (50)29.3 ± 6.1
CD 198 (42.1)34.8 ± 11.0
UC 83 (37.5)46.6 ± 19.5
1998Griga T (147)Germanycase-control4695 (55.6)31.5 ± 8.0
CD 3113 (41.9)33.1 ± 7.9
UC 157 (46.7)34.5 ± 12.0
2001Kanazawa S (148)Japancase-control222012 (60)60 ± 8
CD 117 (63.6)38.5 ± 5.75
UC 116 (54.5)56.5 ± 10.75
2003Kapsoritakis A (149)Greececase-control942338 ± 9
CD 44
UC 50
2015Kleiner G (150)Italycase-control26;CD15;UC1112 (46.2)9 ± 3.753722 (59.5)11 ± 4
2004Magro F (151)Portugalcase-control21811559 (51.3)32 ± 9.75
CD 14584 (57.9)33 ± 14.5
UC 7343 (58.9)35 ± 11.75
2011Pousa ID (152)Spaincase-controlactive UC 134646 ± 1226
2007Pousa ID (153)Spaincase-controlCD 7039 (55.7)42 ± 133015 (50)43 ± 14
1997Schurer-Maly CC (154)Switzer-landcase-controlCD 2432
UC 23
2020deZoeten EF (155)Americacase-controlpediatric5/18 (27.8)12.7 ± 12.7pediatric 177/18 (38.9)12.7 ± 16.5
active IBD 17
adultadult 197/19 (36.8)56.9 ± 14.4
actuve UC 1036.4 ± 11.7
inactive UC 1052.6 ± 17.7
2007Wiercinska-Drapalo A (156)Polandcase-controlUC 3313 (39.4)43 ± 12.75205 (25)38 ± 6
YearAuthorCountryStudy typePsAHC
Sample sizeFemale (%)Age (years)Sample sizeFemale (%)Age (years)
2009Ablin JN (14)Israelcase-controlskin104 (40)48.6 ± 18.61612 (75)41.69 ± 9.71
arthritis2210 (45.5)47.18 ± 8.15
2007Akman A (157)Turkeycase-control4630 (65.2)43.2 ± 14.4207 (35)34.6 ± 14.5
2010Anderson KS (158)Swedencase-controlplaque(PV) 144 (28.6)47 ± 10.7514
2001Ballara S (12)UKcohortarthritis136246 ± 17.04316549 ± 12.59
2016Batycka-Baran A (159)Polandcase-controlarthritis 2437.548.29 ± 9.0536
2012Batycka-Baran A (160)Polandcase-controlplaque-type psoriasis 6341.342.16 ± 15.423148.441.35 ± 15.23
2016Capkin AA (161)Turkeycase-control4816 (33.3)48.6 ± 12.54820 (41.7)52.3 ± 8.4
1999Bhushan M (162)UKcase-controlchronic plaque 156 (30)45 ± 13.75137 (53.8)43 ± 14.75
2002Creamer D (163)UKcase-control227 (31.8)47 ± 12177 (41.2)42 ± 10
severe 11
moderate 11
arthritis 10
non-arthritis 12
2010Flisiak I (164)Polandcase-controlchronic plaque 5916 (27.1)49.1 ± 2.120
mild 24
moderate 20
severe 15
2007Fink AM (165)Austriacase-controlarthritis 2810 (35.7)54 ± 1392 (22.2)56 ± 9
active 144 (28.6)
inactive 146 (42.9)
2012Kaur S (166)Estoniacase-controlPlaque (PV) 5823 (39.7)41.7 ± 12.05830 (51.7)41.4 ± 12.1
2014Meki AR (167)Saudi Arabiacase-controlPlaque (PV)5822 (37.9)30.17 ± 10.712211 (50)29.36 ± 8.83
2020Midde HS (168)Indiacohort5416 (29.6)41.28 ± 11.835416 (29.6)41.22 ± 11.77
2002Nielsen HJ (169)DenmarkcohortPlaque (PV)169 (56.25)24–70 years13
2008Nofal A (170)Egyptcase-controlPlaque (PV)3011 (37)42 ± 12.2104 (40)38.5 ± 11.6
2015Przepiera-Bedzak H (135)Polandcase-controlarthritis 6939 (56.5)52.0 ± 12.02919 (65.5)48.2 ± 13.5
2016Przepiera-Bedzak H (136)Polandcase-controlarthritis 7643 (56.6)50.8 ± 12.73019 (63.3)43.5 ± 9.4
2013Przepiera-Bedzak H (171)Polandcase-controlarthritis 8043 (53.8)50.1 ± 12.02012 (60)48.1 ± 14.0
2016Shahidi-Dadras M (172)Irancase-controlsevere chronic plaque psoriasis 6027 (45)38.35 ± 14.966027 (45)39.55 ± 15.24
2016Shahidi-Dadras M (173)Irancase-controlmoderate-severe chronic plaque psoriasis 5827 (46.6)37.5 ± 14.16027 (45)39.6 ± 15.2
2009Takahashi H (174)Japancase-control12241 (33.6)47.5 ± 7.67824 (30.8)38.6 ± 12.25
2017Zheng YZ (175)Chinacase-controlPlaque (PV)19474 (38.1)39.5 ± 12.7017581 (46.3)40.2 ± 7.58
YearAuthorCountryStudy typeGDHC
Sample sizeFemale (%)Age (years)Sample sizeFemale (%)Age (years)
2020Cheng CW (10)Chinacase-control4010040.9 ± 13.51410044.1 ± 13.8
2009Figueroa-Vega N (176)Spaincase-control4432 (72.7)45.11 ± 15.202214 (63.6)43.47 ± 8.62
active GO 139 (69.2)46.42 ± 12.58
inactive GO 1310 (76.9)48.77 ± 19.31
No GO 1813 (72.2)41.85 ± 10.76
1998Iitaka M (177)Japancase-control4939 (79.6)34.7 ± 11.93726 (70.3)35.7 ± 11.2
2014Kajdaniuk D (178)Polandcase-controlactive GO1612 (75)37 ± 922
2016Rancier M (179)Tunisiacase-control214 (19.0)44.84 ± 12.105529 (52.7)46.36 ± 11.03
2014Ye X (180)Chinacase-control643020 (66.7)32.8 ± 10.8
GD 3019 (63.3)34.50 ± 13.45
active GO3423 (67.6)31.06 ± 15.15
inactive GO149 (64.3)30.79 ± 17.80

Population characteristics of the studies included in the meta-analysis.

SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus; LN, lupus nephritis; HC, healthy control; RA, rheumatoid arthritis; HC, healthy control; SSc, systemic sclerosis; VEDOSS, very early diagnosis of systemic sclerosis; UCTD, undifferentiated connective tissue disease; HC, healthy control; BD, Behcet’s disease; HC, healthy control; KD, Kawasaki disease; HC, healthy control. AS, ankylosing spondylitis; HC, healthy control; IBD, inflammatory bowel disease; CD, Crohn’s disease; UC, ulcerative colitis; HC, healthy control; PsA, psoriasis; PV, psoriasis vulgaris; HC, healthy control; GD, Graves’ disease; GO, Graves’ ophthalmopathy; HC, healthy control.

Meta-Analysis of the Association Between Circulating VEGF and SLE

Circulating VEGF levels were significantly higher in SLE than in HC (SMD 0.84, 95%CI 0.25–1.44, P = 0.0056) (Figure 2A). Additionally, circulating VEGF was higher in active SLE than in inactive SLE (SMD 0.80, 95%CI 0.02–1.59, P = 0.0454) (Figure 2B-i), serum VEGF levels remained remarkable higher in active SLE than in inactive SLE (SMD 0.51, 95% CI 0.33–0.70, P <0.0001) (Figure 2B-ii), whereas serum VEGF levels were significantly higher in SLE with renal involvement than that without renal involvement (SMD 1.43, 95% CI 0.58–2.28, P = 0.0010) (Figure 2C). Due to the observed heterogeneity, the sample types were stratified (serum versus plasma); the heterogeneity in serum VEGF levels in active and inactive SLE disappeared after removing studies using plasma (before, I2 = 94.04%, P = 0.0002; after, I2 = 0.00%, P = 0.3178).

Figure 2

The subgroup analysis indicated significantly higher serum (SMD 0.64, 95% CI 0.37–0.91, P <0.0001) and plasma (SMD 1.56, 95% CI 0.49–2.63, P = 0.0040) VEGF levels in SLE (Figure 2D-i). Significantly higher circulating VEGF levels were present in small (n ≤50) (SMD 0.96, 95% CI 0.56–1.35, P <0.0001) and large (n >50) (SMD 0.39, 95% CI 0.07–0.72, P = 0.0170) studies (Figure 2D-ii).

Meta-regression analysis adjusted for age and percentage of female patients demonstrated age (P = 0.0030) but not sex (P = 0.9700) had a significant effect.

Meta-Analysis of the Association Between Circulating VEGF and RA

Circulating VEGF levels were significantly higher in RA than in HC (SMD 1.48, 95% CI 0.82–2.15, P <0.0001) (Figure 3A). Overall heterogeneity was apparent.

Figure 3

The subgroup analysis indicated significantly higher VEGF levels in serum (SMD 1.49, 95% CI 1.09–1.88, P <0.0001) but not plasma (P = 0.0820) in RA (Figure 3B-i). Higher circulating VEGF levels were present in small (n ≤50) (SMD 1.58, 95% CI 1.10–2.05, P <0.0001) and large (n >50) (SMD 1.03, 95% CI 0.47–1.60, P <0.0001) studies on RA (Figure 3B-ii).

Meta-regression analysis adjusted for age and female sex demonstrated neither age (P = 0.4090) nor sex (P = 0.7570) had a significant effect.

Meta-Analysis of the Association Between Circulating VEGF and SSc

Circulating VEGF levels were significantly higher in SSc than in HC (SMD 0.56, 95% CI 0.36–0.75, P <0.0001) (Figure 4A). The comparison of serum VEGF levels between limited and diffused SSc did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.2735) (Figure 4B).

Figure 4

The subgroup analysis performed due to the obvious overall heterogeneity (I2 = 98.35%, P <0.0001) revealed significantly higher VEGF levels in serum (SMD 0.48, 95% CI 0.28–0.67, P <0.0001) and plasma (SMD 0.86, 95% CI 0.49–1.24, P <0.0001) samples of patients with SSc (Figure 4C-i). Elevated circulating VEGF levels were observed in small (n ≤50) (SMD 0.57, 995% CI 0.33–0.81, P <0.0001) and large (n >50) (SMD 0.52, 95% CI 0.28–0.75, P <0.0001) studies on SSc (Figure 4C-ii).

Meta-regression analysis adjusted for age and female sex demonstrated neither age (P = 0.2740) nor sex (P = 0.7020) had a significant effect.

Meta-Analysis of the Association Between Circulating VEGF and BD

Circulating VEGF levels were significantly higher in BD than in HC (SMD 1.65, 95% CI 0.88–2.41, P <0.0001) (Figure 5A) as well as in active BD than in inactive BD (SMD 0.91, 95% CI 0.26–1.55, P = 0.0064) (Figure 5B). Heterogeneity was present.

Figure 5

The subgroup analysis revealed significantly elevated serum VEGF levels (SMD 1.60, 95% CI 0.85–2.34, P <0.0001) (Figure 5C-i), specifically in small (n ≤50) (SMD 1.86, 95% CI 1.15–2.57, P <0.0001) and not in large (n >50) studies (P = 0.1200) (Figure 5C-ii).

Meta-regression analysis adjusted for age and female sex demonstrated neither age (P = 0.2700) nor sex (P = 0.0720) had a significant effect.

Meta-Analysis of the Association Between Circulating VEGF and KD

Circulating VEGF levels were elevated in KD than in HC (SMD 2.41, 95% CI 0.10–4.72, P = 0.0406) (Figure S1A) and febrile controls (SMD 1.08, 95% CI 0.02–2.14, P = 0.0452) (Figure S1B). The comparison of serum VEGF levels between acute and convalescent KD revealed no statistical significance (P = 0.0831) (Figure S1C). Heterogeneity was prominent.

The subgroup analysis indicated serum VEGF levels were higher in KD than in HC (SMD 2.26, 95% CI 0.93–3.58, P = 0.0010) (Figure S1D-i). Increased circulating VEGF levels were found in small (n ≤50) (SMD 1.36, 95% CI 0.45–2.27, P = 0.0030) and large (n >50) studies (SMD 3.19, 95% CI 1.01–5.38, P = 0.0040) (Figure S1D-ii). Meta-regression analysis adjusted for age and female sex demonstrated female sex (P = 0.0100) but not age (P = 0.1280) had a significant effect.

Meta-Analysis of the Association Between Circulating VEGF and AS

Circulating VEGF levels were significantly elevated in AS than in HC (SMD 0.78, 95% CI 0.23–1.33, P = 0.0052) (Figure S2A). The overall heterogeneity was apparent (I2 = 95.68%, P <0.0001).

The subgroup analysis revealed significantly higher serum VEGF levels in AS than in HC (SMD 0.60, 95% CI 0.36–0.84, P <0.0001) (Figure S2B-i). Significantly elevated circulating VEGF levels were found in small (n ≤50) (SMD 1.66, 95% CI 0.35–2.98, P = 0.0130) and large (n >50) studies (SMD 0.55, 95% CI 0.29–0.80, P <0.0001) on AS (Figure S2B-ii).

Meta-regression analysis adjusted for age and female sex demonstrated neither age (P = 0.8040) nor sex (P = 0.8500) had a significant effect.

Meta-Analysis of the Association Between Circulating VEGF and IBD

Serum VEGF levels were significantly higher in IBD than in HC (SMD 0.57, 95% CI 0.43–0.71, P <0.0001) (Figure S3A). The overall heterogeneity was extremely low (I2 = 3.12%, P <0.0001). Meta-regression analysis adjusted for age or females demonstrated insignificant effect of age (P = 0.0760) and sex (P = 0.2610).

Serum VEGF levels were significantly higher in ulcerative colitis (UC) than in HC (SMD 0.69, 95% CI 0.21–1.16, P = 0.0048) (Figure S3B-i). Both the studies on active UC and those that did not specify disease activity reported significantly higher serum VEGF levels in UC (SMD 0.75, 95% CI 0.17–1.34, P = 0.0120 and SMD 0.56, 95% CI 0.20–0.93, P = 0.0030, respectively) (Figure S3D-i). The serum VEGF levels were not significantly different between active and inactive UC (P = 0.1658) (Figure S3C-i). Meta-regression analysis adjusted for age and female sex demonstrated insignificant effects of age (P = 0.8330) and sex (P = 0.2150).

Serum VEGF levels were significantly higher in Crohn’s disease (CD) than in HC (SMD 0.72, 95% CI 0.29–1.16, P = 0.0011) (Figure S3B-ii). Both the studies on active CD and those that did not specify disease activity reported significantly higher serum VEGF levels in CD (SMD 0.62, 95% CI 0.10–1.15, P = 0.0200 and SMD 0.78, 95% CI 0.33–1.22, P = 0.0010, respectively) (Figure S3D-ii). Significantly increased serum VEGF levels were present in small (n ≤50) (SMD 0.86, 95% CI 0.32–1.40, P = 0.002) but not in large (n >50) studies (P = 0.0600) (Figure S3D-iii). Moreover, serum VEGF levels were significantly higher in active CD than in inactive CD (SMD 0.53, 95% CI 0.09–0.96, P = 0.0176) (Figure S3C-ii). Meta-regression analysis adjusted for age and female sex demonstrated age (P = 0.0120) and sex (P = 0.0010) had significant effects.

Meta-Analysis of the Association Between Circulating VEGF and PsA

Circulating VEGF levels were significantly higher in PsA (SMD 0.98, 95% CI 0.62–1.34, P <0.0001) (Figure S4A), in psoriatic arthritis (SMD 0.72, 95% CI 0.12–1.32, P = 0.0192) (Figure S4B), and psoriasis with skin involvement (SMD 1.26, 95% CI 0.65–1.86, P = 0.0001) than in HC (Figure S4C). Heterogeneity was observed in the analyses.

The subgroup analysis indicated significantly higher serum (SMD 1.02, 95% CI 0.50–1.55, P <0.0001) and plasma (SMD 0.67, 95% CI 0.37–0.97, P <0.0001) VEGF levels in PsA (Figure S4D-i). Significantly higher circulating VEGF levels were found in small (n ≤50) (SMD 0.80, 95% CI 0.49–1.11, P <0.0001) and large (n >50) (SMD 1.12, 95% CI 0.40–1.83, P = 0.0020) studies on PsA (Figure S4D-ii). Meta-regression analysis adjusted for age and female sex demonstrated that neither age (P = 0.0570) nor sex (P = 0.1890) had a significant effect.

Meta-Analysis of the Association Between Circulating VEGF and GD

Circulating VEGF levels were significantly higher in GD than in HC (SMD 0.69, 95% CI 0.20–1.19, P = 0.0056), with considerable heterogeneity (Figure S5A). Circulating VEGF levels were higher in active than in inactive Graves’ ophthalmopathy (GO) (SMD 0.80, 95% CI 0.29–1.30, P = 0.0019), without any heterogeneity (I2 = 0.00%, P = 0.7548) (Figure S5B).

Serum (SMD 0.77, 95% CI 0.27–1.28, P = 0.0020) but not plasma (P = 0.3880) VEGF levels were significantly higher in GD than in HC (Figure S5C). Meta-regression analysis adjusted for age and female sex demonstrated the significant effect of age (P = 0.0070) but not sex (P = 0.2420).

Correlation Analyses Between Circulation VEGF and AD Clinical Features

We explored the potential correlation of VEGF in clinical implications and hematological indicators of ADs. For SLE (Figure S6), the summary Fisher’s z showed a positive, moderate correlation between circulating VEGF level and disease activity (SLEDAI/SLAM, ES 0.55, 95% CI 0.29–0.81, P <0.0001; summary r = 0.50), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR; ES 0.40, 95% CI 0.18–0.63, P = 0.0004; summary r = 0.38). A negative, poor correlation was found for C3 (ES −0.45, 95% CI −0.81 to −0.08, P = 0.0162, summary r = −0.42). There was no correlation between circulating VEGF level and platelet count (P = 0.1163).

In RA (Figure S7), there was a positive, weak correlation between circulating VEGF and disease activity (DAS-28; ES 0.33, 95% CI 0.22–0.44, P <0.0001, summary r = 0.32), ESR (ES 0.35, 95% CI 0.18–0.51, P <0.0001; summary r = 0.34) as well as C-reactive protein (CRP; ES 0.38, 95% CI 0.24–0.52, P <0.0001; summary r = 0.36).

In SSc (Figure S8), there was a positive, moderate relationship between circulating VEGF level and pulmonary artery pressure (ES 0.62, 95% CI 0.37–0.87, P <0.0001; summary r = 0.55) and Medical Research Council dyspnea score (ES 0.65, 95% CI 0.08–1.22, P = 0.0246; summary r = 0.57). There was no relationship between circulating VEGF level and modified Ronan skin score (P = 0.3100).

In BD (Figure S9), summary correlation coefficients indicated a significant, positive, and strong correlation with disease activity based on Behcet’s disease current activity form score (ES 1.22, 95% CI 0.03–2.41, P = 0.0446, summary r = 0.84) and moderate correlation with ESR (ES 0.47, 95% CI 0.11–0.82, P = 0.0108, summary r = 0.44).

In AS (Figure S10), circulating VEGF level was poorly correlated with disease activity (BASDAI/BASMI; ES 0.35, 95% CI 0.09–0.60, P = 0.0080; summary r = 0.34), ESR (ES 0.26, 95% CI 0.17–0.36, P <0.0001; summary r = 0.25), and CRP (ES 0.24, 95% CI 0.14–0.35, P <0.0001; summary r = 0.24).

In IBD (Figure S11), circulating VEGF level exhibited a positive, poor correlation with Crohn’s disease activity index (CDAI; ES 0.34, 95% CI 0.10–0.57, P = 0.0053, summary r = 0.33), medium correlation with UC activity index (UDAI; ES 0.57, 95% CI 0.29–0.86, P = 0.0001; summary r = 0.52), strong correlation with ESR (ES 0.87, 95% CI 0.63–1.12, P <0.0001; summary r = 0.70), and weak correlation with platelet count (ES 0.32, 95% CI 0.16–0.49, P = 0.0001; summary r 0.31).

In PsA (Figure S12), circulating VEGF level was positively correlated with psoriasis area and severity index score (ES 1.12, 95% CI 0.64–1.60, P <0.0001; summary r = 0.81) and had a positive, moderate correlation with disease duration (ES 0.51, 95% CI 0.32–0.69, P <0.0001; summary r = 0.47).

Sensitivity Analysis and Publication Bias

The sensitivity analysis revealed the stability of pooled results (data not shown). For SLE, RA, SSc, KD, and AS, the contour-enhanced funnel plots revealed no publication bias (Figure S13), the meta-trim practice demonstrated that all imputed studies fell into the significant region. In contrast, Egger’s test suggested publication bias for SLE, RA, and KD (P <0.0001 for all) as well as for AS (P = 0.0001). However, there was consistency in publication bias for SSc by Egger’s test (P = 0.1413). This remind us to be cautious with using Egger’s test to determine publication bias in small number of studies (<20). There was no publication bias with PsA and GD (P = 0.4874 and P = 0.5419, respectively), in contrast to that observed with BD (P = 0.0006). The imputed studies on IBD fell into the non-significant region, and Egger’s test also represented evidence of it (P = 0.0017) in UC; the existence of publication bias was proven by Egger’s test (P = 0.0113) in CD.

Discussion

In the current meta-analysis, we found a close relationship between circulating VEGF level and ADs. First, our analyses revealed significantly increased circulating VEGF levels in SLE, RA, SSc, BD, KD, AS, IBD, PsA, and GD. Additionally, we showed that serum VEGF could distinguish active from inactive SLE and renal from non-renal SLE; it could also discriminate between active and inactive CD. Likewise, circulating VEGF had a strong ability to differentiate active from inactive BD and GO. Serum VEGF exhibited its dipartite boundedness in limited/diffused cutaneous SSc, active/inactive UC, and acute/convalescent KD. Furthermore, we demonstrated the correlation of circulating VEGF levels with metrics of disease activity and severity (SLEDAI/SLAM, DAS-28, MRC dyspnea score, modified Ronan skin score, BD current activity form score, BASDAI/BASMI, CDAI, UDAI, psoriasis area and severity index) as well as with hematological parameters (ESR, CRP, platelet count, pulmonary artery pressure). Overall, these results indicate that circulating VEGF reflects pathogenesis and should be considered as a potent hematological marker for diagnosis and disease progression in ADs.

Structural and functional abnormities in neovasculature may lead to damage in chronic inflammatory diseases. Consecutive angiogenesis and immune-mediated vascular endothelial cell injury and dysfunction as well as persistent inflammation play important pathological roles in SLE (20), whereas expansion and invasion of synovial vessels facilitate inflammation and erosive joint destruction in RA (12). Early generalized microvascular endothelial damage leading to immune activation and defective angiogenesis are significant events in cumulative systemic fibrosis and microangiopathy in SSc (76). Additionally, BD is characterized by systemic vasculitis, inflammatory infiltrates, subsequent vascular lesions, and neovascularization (113, 115), whereas subendothelial edema and fenestrated endothelium constitute acute systemic vasculitis observed in KD (181). Structural changes in vascular endothelium due to inflammation and hypoxia stimulate angiogenesis to permeate vascular and mediate tissue repair in IBD (6). Finally, early psoriatic skin plaque formation is triggered by inappropriate expansion and vascular alterations, pronounced permeability, and endothelial cell proliferation (162). Therefore, angiogenesis and angiopathy are considered as major pathogenic events predisposing to ADs.

VEGF, an increasingly recognized proangiogenic inducer of endothelial proliferation and microvascular hyperpermeability, may reverse the tide of inducers against inhibitors and promote angiogenesis (182). Despite the unclear role of angiogenesis in AS and GD, higher-than-normal VEGF levels support its role in bone and enchondral ossification in AS (183) and increased microvessel density in GD (184). Over the past decades, numerous studies have reported increased VEGF levels in ADs, beyond its well-known role in tumorigenesis. In the present study, our meta-analysis reveals differences in circulating VEGF levels between patients with ADs and HC subjects, providing further evidence for its utility in determining disease activity and severity in ADs.

In the present meta-analysis, there were variations in circulating VEGF levels due to differences in sample collection methods and demographic characteristics across the studies, requiring adjustment for the interpretation of the final laboratory results. Serum VEGF levels are 7–10 times higher than plasma VEGF levels in RA (60). Serum VEGF is a combination of efflux from platelets, neutrophils during coagulation, and circulating VEGF, which rarely occurs in vivo; in contrast, plasma VEGF directly reflects circulating VEGF in the absence of coagulation in vivo. In support of this difference, the present meta-analysis also revealed that the removal of plasma samples from the analysis led to the disappearance of heterogeneity in serum VEGF levels in active and inactive SLE. Plasma samples with citrate anticoagulants had the lowest VEGF levels, reflecting that that reservation of platelets VEGF releasing is effective and that different anticoagulation procedures should be considered in evaluating variations in VEGF levels across studies. Higher plasma VEGF levels in female patients compared with male patients, increasing VEGF levels with age in adults, and decreasing VEGF levels with age in children illustrate the contributory roles of sex and age to discrepancy (185). The cohort size in specific studies might also impact the mean and standard deviation. Therefore, we addressed these variables in subgroup and meta-regression analyses. The subgroup analyses explored the source of heterogeneity in serum VEGF levels for only studies on active and inactive SLE (before, I2 = 94.04%, P = 0.0002; after, I2 = 0.00%, P = 0.3178). We also observed apparent associations of circulating VEGF levels with age and female sex in SLE and CD, with sex in KD, and with age in GD.

There are several limitations in the present meta-analysis. First, although subgroup and meta-regression analyses were performed to explore heterogeneity, much of it remains to be explained and reported. Second, the funnel plots indicated publication bias in studies on BD and IBD, including UC as well as CD, which might have led to the overestimation of pooled SMDs. Third, data could not be fully retrieved, which might have resulted in missing values in meta-regression and the omission of covariates in tests assessing heterogeneity. Availability of complete data on patient inclusion and exclusion criteria, ethnicity, AD treatment details, and exact timing and method of VEGF measurement would greatly reduce the bias in our analyses. Although the existing heterogeneity could be partially explained by age, sex, sample type, and sample size of the individual studies, an exact conclusion could not be drawn due to the lacking explanation for the remaining heterogeneity. Further studies using more comprehensive data should be performed to elucidate the association of circulating VEGF levels with ADs.

In conclusion, our meta-analysis unveiled a close association between circulating VEGF levels and ADs including disease activity and severity as well as clinical hematological manifestations. Serum VEGF is a reliable marker that can distinguish active from inactive in SLE and GO and can potentially differentiate IBD from HC. Early and regular measurement of circulating VEGF levels may be considered as a noninvasive method to monitor vascular involvement and activity in ADs. Future studies should focus on the prognostic and diagnostic utility of circulating VEGF, its role in pathogenesis, and the utility of VEGF-targeted therapeutic strategies in ADs.

Funding

This research was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China Grants (81871302) and Beijing Key Clinical Specialty for Laboratory Medicine - Excellent Project (No. ZK201000).

Statements

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Author contributions

YL conceived and designed the research. HZ and HL extracted data and conducted quality assessment. CL, LC, SY, HL, and HZ analyzed the data. HZ wrote the paper. All authors are accountable for all aspects of the study, and attest to the accuracy and integrity of the results. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2021.674343/full#supplementary-material

References

  • 1

    KochAE. Angiogenesis as a Target in Rheumatoid Arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis (2003) 62(Suppl 2):ii60–7. doi: 10.1136/ard.62.suppl_2.ii60

  • 2

    BrenchleyPE. Angiogenesis in Inflammatory Joint Disease: A Target for Therapeutic Intervention. Clin Exp Immunol (2000) 121:426–9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2249.2000.01299.x

  • 3

    KiddBLMooreKWaltersMTSmithJLCawleyMI. Immunohistological Features of Synovitis in Ankylosing Spondylitis: A Comparison With Rheumatoid Arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis (1989) 48:92–8. doi: 10.1136/ard.48.2.92

  • 4

    TeraiMYasukawaKNarumotoSTatenoSOanaSKohnoY. Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in Acute Kawasaki Disease. Am J Cardiol (1999) 83:337–9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(98)00864-9

  • 5

    CiołkiewiczMKuryliszyn-MoskalAKlimiukPA. Analysis of Correlations Between Selected Endothelial Cell Activation Markers, Disease Activity, and Nailfold Capillaroscopy Microvascular Changes in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patients. Clin Rheumatol (2010) 29:175–80. doi: 10.1007/s10067-009-1308-7

  • 6

    CiborDDomagala-RodackaRRodackiTJurczyszynAMachTOwczarekD. Endothelial Dysfunction in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: Pathogenesis, Assessment and Implications. World J Gastroenterol (2016) 22:1067–77. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i3.1067

  • 7

    SakaneTTakenoMSuzukiNInabaG. Behçet’s Disease. N Engl J Med (1999) 341:1284–91. doi: 10.1056/nejm199910213411707

  • 8

    SgoncRGruschwitzMSDietrichHRecheisHGershwinMEWickG. Endothelial Cell Apoptosis is a Primary Pathogenetic Event Underlying Skin Lesions in Avian and Human Scleroderma. J Clin Invest (1996) 98:785–92. doi: 10.1172/jci118851

  • 9

    HennoABlacherSLambertCADeroanneCNoëlALapièreCet al. Histological and Transcriptional Study of Angiogenesis and Lymphangiogenesis in Uninvolved Skin, Acute Pinpoint Lesions and Established Psoriasis Plaques: An Approach of Vascular Development Chronology in Psoriasis. J Dermatol Sci (2010) 57:162–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2009.12.006

  • 10

    ChengCWWuCZTangKTFangWFLinJD. Simultaneous Measurement of Twenty-Nine Circulating Cytokines and Growth Factors in Female Patients With Overt Autoimmune Thyroid Diseases. Autoimmunity (2020) 53:261–9. doi: 10.1080/08916934.2020.1755965

  • 11

    ChoiJJMinDJChoMLMinSYKimSJLeeSSet al. Elevated Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in Systemic Sclerosis. J Rheumatol (2003) 30(7):1529–33.

  • 12

    BallaraSTaylorPCReuschPMarméDFeldmannMMainiRNet al. Raised Serum Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Levels are Associated With Destructive Change in Inflammatory Arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol (2001) 44:2055–64. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(200109)44:9<2055::Aid-art355>3.0.Co;2-2

  • 13

    FavaRAOlsenNJSpencer-GreenGYeoKTYeoTKBerseBet al. Vascular Permeability Factor/Endothelial Growth Factor (VPF/VEGF): Accumulation and Expression in Human Synovial Fluids and Rheumatoid Synovial Tissue. J Exp Med (1994) 180:341–6. doi: 10.1084/jem.180.1.341

  • 14

    AblinJNGoldsteinZAloushVMatzHElkayamOCaspiDet al. Normal Levels and Function of Endothelial Progenitor Cells in Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis. Rheumatol Int (2009) 29:257–62. doi: 10.1007/s00296-008-0676-7

  • 15

    ZhouLLuGShenLWangLWangM. Serum Levels of Three Angiogenic Factors in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Their Clinical Significance. BioMed Res Int (2014) 2014:627126. doi: 10.1155/2014/627126

  • 16

    AricaDAAkşanBÖremAAltinkaynakBAYayliSSönmezM. High Levels of Endothelial Progenitor Cells and Circulating Endothelial Cells in Patients With Behçet’s Disease and Their Relationship to Disease Activity. Bras Dermatol (2019) 94:320–6. doi: 10.1590/abd1806-4841.20198169

  • 17

    AksoyEKÇetinkayaHSavaşBEnsariATorgutalpMEfeC. Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor, Endostatin Levels and Clinical Features Among Patients With Ulcerative Colitis and Irritable Bowel Syndrome and Among Healthy Controls: A Cross-Sectional Analytical Study. Sao Paulo Med J (2018) 136:543–50. doi: 10.1590/1516-3180.2018.0274161118

  • 18

    OhnoTIgarashiHInoueKAkazawaKJohoKHaraT. Serum Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor: A New Predictive Indicator for the Occurrence of Coronary Artery Lesions in Kawasaki Disease. Eur J Pediatr (2000) 159:424–9. doi: 10.1007/s004310051300

  • 19

    LinTTLuJQiCYYuanLLiXLXiaLPet al. Elevated Serum Level of IL-27 and VEGF in Patients With Ankylosing Spondylitis and Associate With Disease Activity. Clin Exp Med (2015) 15:227–31. doi: 10.1007/s10238-014-0281-x

  • 20

    BarbulescuALVrejuAFBugaAMSanduRECriveanuCTudorascuDRet al. Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus - Correlations With Disease Activity and Nailfold Capillaroscopy Changes. Romanian J Morphol Embryol (2015) 56(3):1011–6.

  • 21

    BarracloughMMcKieSParkerBJacksonAPembertonPElliottRet al. Altered Cognitive Function in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Associations With Inflammation and Functional and Structural Brain Changes. Ann Rheumatic Dis (2019) 78:934–40. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-214677

  • 22

    FosterWCarruthersDLipGYHBlannAD. Relationships Between Endothelial, Inflammatory and Angiogenesis Markers in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Implications for Cardiovascular Pathophysiology. Thromb Res (2009) 123:659–64. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2008.06.014

  • 23

    MisraSMondalSChatterjeeSGuinASinhamahapatraPGhoshA. Association of Angiogenic and Inflammatory Markers With Power Doppler Ultrasound Vascularity Grade and DAS28-CRP in Early Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Comparative Analysis. BioMed Res Int (2018) 2018:6906374. doi: 10.1155/2018/6906374

  • 24

    SoneHSakauchiMTakahashiASuzukiHInoueNIidaKet al. Elevated Levels of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in the Sera of Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Correlation With Disease Activity. Life Sci (2001) 69:1861–9. doi: 10.1016/s0024-3205(01)01264-4

  • 25

    WanXWangWLiuJTongT. Estimating the Sample Mean and Standard Deviation From the Sample Size, Median, Range and/or Interquartile Range. BMC Med Res Methodol (2014) 14:135. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-135

  • 26

    CiprandiGMurdacaGColomboBMDe AmiciMMarsegliaGL. Serum Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in Allergic Rhinitis and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Hum Immunol (2008) 69:510–2. doi: 10.1016/j.humimm.2008.05.010

  • 27

    ColomboBMCacciapagliaFPuntoniMMurdacaGRossiERodriguezGet al. Traditional and non Traditional Risk Factors in Accelerated Atherosclerosis in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Role of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGATS Study). Autoimmun Rev (2009) 8:309–15. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2008.10.002

  • 28

    De JesusGROliveiraCSDos SantosFCDe JesusNRPortoLCLevyRAet al. Angiogenic and Antiangiogenic Factors in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Arthritis Rheumatol (2014) 66:S1157. doi: 10.1002/art.38914

  • 29

    DingYLiaoWYiZWXiangWHeXJ. Association of miRNA-145 Expression in Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells With Vascular Damages in Patients With Lupus Nephritis. Int J Clin Exp Pathol (2015) 8(10):12646–56.

  • 30

    ElhelalyNSElhawaryIMAlazizIAAAlsalamMIAElfishawyHMSherifMM. The Clinical Utility of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor as Predictive Marker for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Activity in Children and Adolescents. J Biol Sci (2009) 9:549–54. doi: 10.3923/jbs.2009.549.554

  • 31

    EdelbauerMKshirsagarSRiedlMBillingHTonshoffBHaffnerDet al. Soluble VEGF Receptor 1 Promotes Endothelial Injury in Children and Adolescents With Lupus Nephritis. Pediatr Nephrol (2012) 27:793800. doi: 10.1007/s00467-011-2062-z

  • 32

    El-GazzarIIIbrahimSEEl-SawyWSFathiHMEissaAH. Assessment of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patients With Anti-Phospholipid Syndrome. Egyptian Rheumatol (2019) 41:41–5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejr.2018.03.005

  • 33

    GhazaliWSWIberahimRAshariNSM. Serum Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) as a Biomarker for Disease Activity in Lupus Nephritis. Malays J Med Sci (2017) 24:6272. doi: 10.21315/mjms2017.24.5.7

  • 34

    HeshmatNMEl-KerdanyTH. Serum Levels of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in Children and Adolescents With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Pediatr Allergy Immunol (2007) 18:346–53. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3038.2006.00510.x

  • 35

    HrycekAJanowskaJCieslikP. Selected Angiogenic Cytokines in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patients. Autoimmunity (2009) 42:459–66. doi: 10.1080/08916930902960339

  • 36

    HrycekAPierzchałaWOsławska-DzierżęgaACieślikP. Selected Growth Factors and Diffusing Capacity of the Lung for Carbon Monoxide in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Rheumatol Int (2009) 30:175–9. doi: 10.1007/s00296-009-0930-7

  • 37

    IbrahimFFDrazHMAl SherbeniHH. Serum Levels of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and Hemoglobin Dielectric Properties in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. J Med Sci (2008) 8:469–76. doi: 10.3923/jms.2008.469.476

  • 38

    KikuchiKKuboMKadonoTYazawaNIhnHTamakiK. Serum Concentrations of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in Collagen Diseases. Br J Dermatol (1998) 139:1049–51. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2133.1998.02563.x

  • 39

    KocaSSAkbasFOzgenMYolbasSIlhanNGundogduBet al. Serum Galectin-3 Level in Systemic Sclerosis. Clin Rheumatol (2014) 33:215–20. doi: 10.1007/s10067-013-2346-8

  • 40

    Kuryliszyn-MoskalAKlimiukPASierakowskiSCiolkiewiczM. Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Relationship to Disease Activity, Systemic Organ Manifestation, and Nailfold Capillaroscopic Abnormalities. Archivum Immunol Et Ther Experiment (2007) 55:179–85. doi: 10.1007/s00005-007-0017-7

  • 41

    LiuJWangXYangXYanQWangSHanW. Investigating the Role of Angiogenesis in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Lupus (2015) 24:621–7. doi: 10.1177/0961203314556293

  • 42

    Merayo-ChalicoJBarrera-VargasAJuarez-VegaGAlcocer-VarelaJArauzAGomez-MartinD. Differential Serum Cytokine Profile in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome. Clin Exp Immunol (2018) 192:165–70. doi: 10.1111/cei.13095

  • 43

    NovikovAAleksandrovaEVerizhnikovaZPanafidinaTPopkovaTKarateevDet al. Cytokine Profiles in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Rheumatoid Arthritis. Ann Rheumatic Dis (2016) 75:907. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-eular.3130

  • 44

    MoneibHASalemSAMAlyDGKhedrHTMWafaeyHAHassanHE. Assessment of Serum Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and Nail Fold Capillaroscopy Changes in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus With and Without Cutaneous Manifestations. J Dermatol (2012) 39:52–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1346-8138.2011.01322.x

  • 45

    NavarroCCandia-ZúñigaLSilveiraLHRuizVGaxiolaMAvilaMCet al. Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Plasma Levels in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Primary Antiphospholipid Syndrome. Lupus (2002) 11:21–4. doi: 10.1191/0961203302lu131oa

  • 46

    RobakEWierzbowskaAChmielaMKulczyckaLSysa-JedrejowskaARobakT. Circulating Total and Active Metalloproteinase-9 and Tissue Inhibitor of Metalloproteinases-1 in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythomatosus. Mediators Inflamm (2006) 2006:17898. doi: 10.1155/mi/2006/17898

  • 47

    RobakESysa-JedrzejewskaARobakT. Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and its Soluble Receptors VEGFR-1 and VEGFR-2 in the Serum of Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Mediators Inflamm (2003) 12:293–8. doi: 10.1080/09629350310001619726

  • 48

    RobakEKulczycka-SiennickaLGerliczZKierstanMKorycka-WolowiecASysa-JedrzejowskaA. Correlations Between Concentrations of Interleukin (IL)-17A, IL-17B and IL-17F, and Endothelial Cells and Proangiogenic Cytokines in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patients. Eur Cytokine Netw (2013) 24:60–8. doi: 10.1684/ecn.2013.0330

  • 49

    RobakEWoźniackaASysa-JedrzejowskaAStepieńHRobakT. Circulating Angiogenesis Inhibitor Endostatin and Positive Endothelial Growth Regulators in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Lupus (2002) 11:348–55. doi: 10.1191/0961203302lu199oa

  • 50

    WillisRSmikleMDeCeulaerKRomay-PenabadZPapalardoEJajoriaPet al. Clinical Associations of Proinflammatory Cytokines, Oxidative Biomarkers and Vitamin D Levels in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Lupus (2017) 26:1517–27. doi: 10.1177/0961203317706557

  • 51

    ZhouLLuGYShenLWangLFWangMJ. Serum Levels of Three Angiogenic Factors in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Their Clinical Significance. BioMed Res Int (2014) 2014:627126. doi: 10.1155/2014/627126

  • 52

    ArdicogluOBozKKamanliAKavuncuVCanatanHOnalSet al. Levels of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis. Pain Clin (2004) 16:187–91. doi: 10.1163/156856904774134406

  • 53

    BottomleyMJWebbNJWatsonCJHoltLBukhariMDentonJet al. Placenta Growth Factor (PlGF) Induces Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) Secretion From Mononuclear Cells and is Co-Expressed With VEGF in Synovial Fluid. Clin Exp Immunol (2000) 119:182–8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2249.2000.01097.x

  • 54

    ChoMLJungYOMoonYMMinSYYoonCHLeeSHet al. Interleukin-18 Induces the Production of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) in Rheumatoid Arthritis Synovial Fibroblasts. Via AP-1-Dependent Pathways Immunol Lett (2006) 103:159–66. doi: 10.1016/j.imlet.2005.10.020

  • 55

    DeveciKButunIDeveciH. Evaluation of Nitric Oxide and Angiogenic Factors in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Ankylosing Spondylitis Patients. FEBS J (2016) 283:244–5. doi: 10.1111/febs.13808

  • 56

    DrouartMSaasPBillotMCedozJPTiberghienPWendlingDet al. High Serum Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Correlates With Disease Activity of Spondylarthropathies. Clin Exp Immunol (2003) 132:158–62. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2249.2003.02101.x

  • 57

    do PradoADBisiMCPiovesanDMBredemeierMBatistaTSPetersenLet al. Ultrasound Power Doppler Synovitis is Associated With Plasma IL-6 in Established Rheumatoid Arthritis. Cytokine (2016) 83:2732. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2016.03.014

  • 58

    GumusACoskunCEmreHOTemelMInalBBSevalHet al. Evaluation of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Levels in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients, With and Without Joint Swelling; a Comparison With Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate, C-reactive Protein, Rheumatoid Factor and Anti-Cyclic Citruillnated Protein. Turkish J Biochem-Turk Biyokim Dergisi (2018) 43:7682. doi: 10.1515/tjb-2016-0308

  • 59

    HeardBJRosvoldJMFritzlerMJEl-GabalawyHWileyJPKrawetzRJ. A Computational Method to Differentiate Normal Individuals, Osteoarthritis and Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Using Serum Biomarkers. J R Soc Interface (2014) 11:20140428. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2014.0428

  • 60

    HetlandMLChristensenIJLottenburgerTJohansenJSSvendsenMNHorslev-PetersenKet al. Circulating VEGF as a Biological Marker in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis? Preanalytical and Biological Variability in Healthy Persons and in Patients. Dis Markers (2008) 24:110. doi: 10.1155/2008/707864

  • 61

    HashimotoNIwasakiTKitanoMOgataAHamanoT. Levels of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and Hepatocyte Growth Factor in Sera of Patients With Rheumatic Diseases. Mod Rheumatol (2003) 13:129–34. doi: 10.3109/s10165-002-0211-8

  • 62

    KimHRParkMKChoMLYoonCHLeeSHParkSHet al. Macrophage Migration Inhibitory Factor Upregulates Angiogenic Factors and Correlates With Clinical Measures in Rheumatoid Arthritis. J Rheumatol (2007) 34(5):927–36.

  • 63

    Kuryliszyn-MoskalAKlimiukPASierakowskiSCiolkiewiczM. A Study on Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and Endothelin-1 in Patients With Extra-Articular Involvement of Rheumatoid Arthritis. Clin Rheumatol (2006) 25:314–9. doi: 10.1007/s10067-005-0007-2

  • 64

    KuwanaMOkazakiYYasuokaHKawakamiYIkedaY. Defective Vasculogenesis in Systemic Sclerosis. Lancet (2004) 364:603–10. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(04)16853-0

  • 65

    MilmanNKarshJBoothRA. Correlation of a Multi-Cytokine Panel With Clinical Disease Activity in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis. Clin Biochem (2010) 43:1309–14. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2010.07.012

  • 66

    OlszewskiWLPazdurJKubasiewiczEZaleskaMCookeCJMillerNE. Lymph Draining From Foot Joints in Rheumatoid Arthritis Provides Insight Into Local Cytokine and Chemokine Production and Transport to Lymph Nodes. Arthritis Rheumatol (2001) 44:541–9. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(200103)44:3<541::Aid-anr102>3.0.Co;2-6

  • 67

    OranskiySPYeliseyevaLNTsanaevaAVZaytsevaNV. Body Composition and Serum Levels of Adiponectin, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor, and Interleukin-6 in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis. Croatian Med J (2012) 53:350–6. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2012.53.350

  • 68

    OzgonenelLCetinETutunSTonbaklarPAralHGuvenenG. The Relation of Serum Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Level With Disease Duration and Activity in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis. Clin Rheumatol (2010) 29:473–7. doi: 10.1007/s10067-009-1343-4

  • 69

    YoungHRChungCPOeserASolusJAsanumaYSokkaTet al. Inflammatory Mediators and Premature Coronary Atherosclerosis in Rheumatoid Arthritis. Arthritis Care Res (2009) 61:1580–5. doi: 10.1002/art.25009

  • 70

    Rodriguez-CarrioJAlperi-LopezMLopez-MejiasRLopezPBallina-GarciaFJAbalFet al. Antibodies to Paraoxonase 1 are Associated With Oxidant Status and Endothelial Activation in Rheumatoid Arthritis. Clin Sci (2016) 130:1889–99. doi: 10.1042/cs20160374

  • 71

    SmetsPDevauchelle-PensecVRouzairePOPereiraBAndreMSoubrierM. Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Levels and Rheumatic Diseases of the Elderly. Arthritis Res Ther (2016) 18:283. doi: 10.1186/s13075-016-1184-x

  • 72

    StrunkJHeinemannENeeckGSchmidtKLLangeU. A New Approach to Studying Angiogenesis in Rheumatoid Arthritis by Means of Power Doppler Ultrasonography and Measurement of Serum Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor. Rheumatol (Oxford) (2004) 43:1480–3. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keh380

  • 73

    TsengJCKengHMYenLJWangLFHuRJLuLY. Analysis of Serum Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and Angiogenesis Inhibitor Endostatin Concentrations in Patients With Different Arthritis. Int J Rheumatic Dis (2010) 13:79. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-185X.2010.01497.x

  • 74

    ZayedAAmerHNasarHIbrahiemAMottawieH. Some Biochemical Changes in Serum and Synovial Fluid of Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis. J Med Sci (2007) 7:526–35. doi: 10.3923/jms.2007.526.535

  • 75

    AlekperovRAlexandrovaENovikovAAnanyevaL. Clinical Associations of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor And its Receptor 2 Type in Systemic Sclerosis. Ann Rheumatic Dis (2018) 77:1531–. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-eular.4064

  • 76

    AllanoreYBorderieDLemaréchalHEkindjianOGKahanA. Nifedipine Decreases sVCAM-1 Concentrations and Oxidative Stress in Systemic Sclerosis But Does Not Affect the Concentrations of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor or its Soluble Receptor 1. Arthritis Res Ther (2004) 6:R309–14. doi: 10.1186/ar1183

  • 77

    AydogduEPamukONDonmezSPamukGE. Decreased interleukin-20 Level in Patients With Systemic Sclerosis: Are They Related With Angiogenesis? Clin Rheumatol (2013) 32:1599–603. doi: 10.1007/s10067-013-2317-0

  • 78

    BenyamineAMagalonJCointeSLacroixRArnaudLBardinNet al. Increased Serum Levels of Fractalkine and Mobilisation of CD34+CD45- Endothelial Progenitor Cells in Systemic Sclerosis. Arthritis Res Ther (2017) 19:60. doi: 10.1186/s13075-017-1271-7

  • 79

    BoselloSLCanestrariGCapacciADi GiorgioADe LucaGBocciMet al. Fmd, VEGF, and IL-6 in Vedoss Patients: The Precocity of Endothelial Dysfunction. Ann Rheumatic Dis (2014) 73. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-eular.4446

  • 80

    BoselloSLDi GiorgioAFotiFDe LucaGBocciMParisiFet al. Decrease of Brachial Artery Endothelial-Dependent Flow-Mediated Dilation Characterizes Very Early Systemic Sclerosis (VEDOSS) Patients. Clin Exp Rheumatol (2014) 32:S23.

  • 81

    ChoraIRomanoEManettiMMazzottaCCostaRMachadoVet al. Evidence for a Derangement of the Microvascular System in Patients With a Very Early Diagnosis of Systemic Sclerosis. J Rheumatol (2017) 44:1190–7. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.160791

  • 82

    CossuMAndraccoRSantanielloAMarchiniMSeverinoACaronniMet al. Serum Levels of Vascular Dysfunction Markers Reflect Disease Severity and Stage in Systemic Sclerosis Patients. Rheumatology (2016) 55:1112–6. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kew017

  • 83

    De LauretisASestiniPPantelidisPHoylesRHansellDMGohNSLet al. Serum Interleukin 6 Is Predictive of Early Functional Decline and Mortality in Interstitial Lung Disease Associated With Systemic Sclerosis. J Rheumatol (2013) 40:435–46. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.120725

  • 84

    Delle SedieARienteLMaggioriniLPratesiFTavoniAMiglioriniPet al. Potential Biomarkers in Patients With Systemic Sclerosis. Int J Rheum Dis (2018) 21:261–5. doi: 10.1111/1756-185x.13196

  • 85

    DistlerJHWStrapatsasTHuscherDDeesCAkhmetshinaAKienerHPet al. Dysbalance of Angiogenic and Angiostatic Mediators in Patients With Mixed Connective Tissue Disease. Ann Rheumatic Dis (2011) 70:1197–202. doi: 10.1136/ard.2010.140657

  • 86

    DistlerODel RossoAGiacomelliRCiprianiPConfortiMLGuiducciSet al. Angiogenic and Angiostatic Factors in Systemic Sclerosis: Increased Levels of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor are a Feature of the Earliest Disease Stages and are Associated With the Absence of Fingertip Ulcers. Arthritis Res (2002) 4:R11. doi: 10.1186/ar596

  • 87

    DunneJVKeenKJVan EedenSF. Circulating Angiopoietin and Tie-2 Levels in Systemic Sclerosis. Rheumatol Int (2013) 33:475–84. doi: 10.1007/s00296-012-2378-4

  • 88

    Dziankowska-BartkowiakBWaszczykowskaEZalewskaASysa-JedrzejowskaA. Correlation of Endostatin and Tissue Inhibitor of Metalloproteinases 2 (TIMP2) Serum Levels With Cardiovascular Involvement in Systemic Sclerosis Patients. Mediators Inflamm (2005) 2005:144–9. doi: 10.1155/mi.2005.144

  • 89

    Dziankowska-BartkowiakBWaszczykowskaEDziankowska-ZaboroszczykEde Graft-JohnsonJEZalewskaAŁuczyńskaMet al. Decreased Ratio of Circulatory Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor to Endostatin in Patients With Systemic Sclerosis–Association With Pulmonary Involvement. Clin Exp Rheumatol (2006) 24(5):508–13.

  • 90

    FaroukHMHamzaSHEl BakrySAYoussefSSAlyIMMoustafaAAet al. Dysregulation of Angiogenic Homeostasis in Systemic Sclerosis. Int J Rheumatic Dis (2013) 16:448–54. doi: 10.1111/1756-185x.12130

  • 91

    Gkodkowska-MrowkaEGorskaECiurzynskiMStelmaszczyk-EmmelABieniasPIrzykKet al. Pro- and Antiangiogenic Markers in Patients With Pulmonary Complications of Systemic Scleroderma. Respir Physiol Neurobiol (2015) 209:6975. doi: 10.1016/j.resp.2014.10.018

  • 92

    GiganteANavariniLMargiottaDBarbanoBAfeltraARosatoE. Female Sexual Dysfunction in Systemic Sclerosis: The Role of Endothelial Growth Factor and Endostatin. J Scleroderma Related Disord (2019) 4:71–6. doi: 10.1177/2397198318776593

  • 93

    HummersLKHallAWigleyFMSimonsM. Abnormalities in the Regulators of Angiogenesis in Patients With Scleroderma. J Rheumatol (2009) 36:576–82. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.080516

  • 94

    IbrahimSEMoradCSFaroukNLouisA. Platelet Indices as Markers of Inflammation in Systemic Sclerosis Patients: Relation to Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and Flow Mediated Dilatation. Egyptian Rheumatol (2018) 40:239–42. doi: 10.1016/j.ejr.2017.12.001

  • 95

    KawashiriSNishinoAIgawaTTakataniAShimizuTUmedaMet al. Prediction of Organ Involvement in Systemic Sclerosis by Serum Biomarkers and Peripheral Endothelial Function. Clin Exp Rheumatol (2018) 36(4):S102–S8.

  • 96

    Kuryliszyn-MoskalAKlimiukPASierakowskiS. Soluble Adhesion Molecules (sVCAM-1, sE-selectin), Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) and Endothelin-1 in Patients With Systemic Sclerosis: Relationship to Organ Systemic Involvement. Clin Rheumatol (2005) 24:111–6. doi: 10.1007/s10067-004-0987-3

  • 97

    LvTTYangFFZhangKLvMHZhangYZhuP. The Risk of Circulating Angiogenic T Cells and Subsets in Patients With Systemic Sclerosis. Int Immunopharmacol (2020) 81:106282. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2020.106282

  • 98

    Michalska-JakubusMCutoloMSmithVKrasowskaD. Imbalanced Serum Levels of Ang1, Ang2 and VEGF in Systemic Sclerosis: Integrated Effects on Microvascular Reactivity. Microvascular Res (2019) 125:103881. doi: 10.1016/j.mvr.2019.103881

  • 99

    MinierTNagyZBalintZFarkasHRadicsJKumanovicsGet al. Construct Validity Evaluation of the European Scleroderma Study Group Activity Index, and Investigation of Possible New Disease Activity Markers in Systemic Sclerosis. Rheumatology (2010) 49:1133–45. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keq022

  • 100

    MorgielEWilandGPiesiakPBogutBWilandP. VEGF Serum Levels as an Indicator of a Visceral Involvement in SSc. Rheumatology (2012) 51:ii75. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/ker475

  • 101

    PapaioannouAIZakynthinosEKostikasKKiropoulosTKoutsokeraAZiogasAet al. Serum VEGF Levels are Related to the Presence of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension in Systemic Sclerosis. BMC Pulm Med (2009) 9:18. doi: 10.1186/1471-2466-9-18

  • 102

    ReiseterSMolbergOGunnarssonRLundMBAalokkenTMAukrustPet al. Associations Between Circulating Endostatin Levels and Vascular Organ Damage in Systemic Sclerosis and Mixed Connective Tissue Disease: An Observational Study. Arthritis Res Ther (2015) 17(1):231. doi: 10.1186/s13075-015-0756-5

  • 103

    SatoSHasegawaMTakeharaK. Serum Levels of Interleukin-6 and interleukin-10 Correlate With Total Skin Thickness Score in Patients With Systemic Sclerosis. J Dermatol Sci (2001) 27:140–6. doi: 10.1016/s0923-1811(01)00128-1

  • 104

    RiccieriVStefanantoniKVasileMMacriVSciarraIIannaceNet al. Abnormal Plasma Levels of Different Angiogenic Molecules are Associated With Different Clinical Manifestations in Patients With Systemic Sclerosis. Clin Exp Rheumatol (2011) 29(2):S46–52.

  • 105

    SaranyaCRameshRBhuvaneshMBalajiCBalameenaSRajeswariS. Serum Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Levels as a Marker of Skin Thickening, Digital Ischemia, and Interstitial Lung Disease in Systemic Sclerosis. Indian J Rheumatol (2018) 13:182–5. doi: 10.4103/injr.injr_132_17

  • 106

    ShenavandehSTarakemehTSarvestaniEKNazariniaMA. Serum Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF), Soluble VEGF Receptor-1 (sVEGFR-1) and sVEGFR-2 in Systemic Sclerosis Patients: Relation to Clinical Manifestations and Capillaroscopy Findings. Egyptian Rheumatol (2017) 39:1924. doi: 10.1016/j.ejr.2016.03.004

  • 107

    SolanillaAVilleneuveJAugustePHuguesMAlioumALepreuxSet al. The Transport of High Amounts of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor by Blood Platelets Underlines Their Potential Contribution in Systemic Sclerosis Angiogenesis. Rheumatology (2009) 48:1036–44. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kep154

  • 108

    YalcinkayaYAdin-CinarSArtim-EsenBKamaliSPehlivanOOcalLet al. Capillaroscopic Findings and Vascular Biomarkers in Systemic Sclerosis: Association of Low CD40L Levels With Late Scleroderma Pattern. Microvascular Res (2016) 108:1721. doi: 10.1016/j.mvr.2016.07.002

  • 109

    WaszczykowskaAGosRWaszczykowskaEDziankowska-BartkowiakBPodgorskiMJurowskiP. The Role of Angiogenesis Factors in the Formation of Vascular Changes in Scleroderma by Assessment of the Concentrations of VEGF and sVEGFR2 in Blood Serum and Tear Fluid. Mediators Inflammation (2020) 2020. doi: 10.1155/2020/7649480

  • 110

    WipffJAvouacJBorderieDZerkakDLemarechalHKahanAet al. Disturbed Angiogenesis in Systemic Sclerosis: High Levels of Soluble Endoglin. Rheumatology (2008) 47:972–5. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/ken100

  • 111

    AricaDAAksanBOremAAltinkaynakBAYayliSSonmezM. High Levels of Endothelial Progenitor Cells and Circulating Endothelial Cells in Patients With Behcet’s Disease and Their Relationship to Disease Activity. Anais Brasileiros Dermatol (2019) 94:320–6. doi: 10.1590/abd1806-4841.20198169

  • 112

    CekmenMEverekliogluCErHInalözHSDoganaySTürközYet al. Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Levels are Increased and Associated With Disease Activity in Patients With Behçet’s Syndrome. Int J Dermatol (2003) 42:870–5. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-4362.2003.01688.x

  • 113

    EldinABIbrahimA. Assessment of the Relationship Between Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and Cardiovascular Involvement in Egyptian Patients With Behçet’s Disease. Egyptian Rheumatol (2014) 36:131–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejr.2013.12.006

  • 114

    ErdemFGündoğduMKikiIAli SariRKiziltunçA. Vascular Endothelial and Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor Serum Levels in Patients With Behçet’s Disease. Rheumatol Int (2005) 25:599603. doi: 10.1007/s00296-004-0484-7

  • 115

    GanebSSSabryHHEl-AssalMMKamalHMFayedAAEl-ShazlyIM. Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and Subclinical Atherosclerosis by Carotid Ultrasonography in Egyptian Patients With Behçet’s Disease. Egyptian Rheumatol (2013) 35:8794. doi: 10.1016/j.ejr.2012.12.001

  • 116

    GheitaTASakrBRRabeaREAbd ElHamidSM. Value of Hematological Indices Versus VEGF as Biomarkers of Activity in Behcet’s Disease. Clin Rheumatol (2019) 38:2201–10. doi: 10.1007/s10067-019-04513-5

  • 117

    IbrahimSEElshishtawyHFHelmysamyAGalalZA. Role of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-1 in Behçet’s Disease. Indian J Rheumatol (2011) 6:168–72. doi: 10.1016/S0973-3698(11)60202-1

  • 118

    KulAAteşOAlkan MelikoğluMUğurMÖztürkNErkayhanGet al. Endocan Measurement for Active Behçet Disease. Arch Rheumatol (2017) 32:197202. doi: 10.5606/ArchRheumatol.2017.6072

  • 119

    OzdamarYBerkerNBaharGSoykanEBicerTOzkanSSet al. Inflammatory Mediators and Posterior Segment Involvement in Ocular Behcet Disease. Eur J Ophthalmol (2009) 19:9981003. doi: 10.1177/112067210901900616

  • 120

    OzturkMAUnverdiSOktarSOBukanNGulbaharOUretenKet al. Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and Carotid Intima-Media Thickness in Patients With Behcet’s Disease. Clin Rheumatol (2008) 27:961–6. doi: 10.1007/s10067-007-0825-5

  • 121

    SertogluEOmmaAYucelCColakSSandikciSCOzgurtasT. The Relationship of Serum VEGF and sVEGFR-1 Levels With Vascular Involvement in Patients With Behcet’s Disease. Scandinavian J Clin Lab Invest (2018) 78:443–9. doi: 10.1080/00365513.2018.1488179

  • 122

    ShakerOAy El-DeenMAEl HadidiHGraceBDEl SherifHAbdel HalimA. The Role of Heat Shock Protein 60, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and Antiphospholipid Antibodies in Behçet Disease. Br J Dermatol (2007) 156:32–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2006.07536.x

  • 123

    YalcindagAGedik-OguzYYalcindagFN. The Relationship Between Serum Levels of Angiogenin, Bfgf, VEGF, and Ocular Involvement in Patients With Behcet’s Disease. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol (2013) 251:1807–12. doi: 10.1007/s00417-013-2322-7

  • 124

    BreunisWBDavilaSShimizuCOharasekiTTakahashiKvan HoudtMet al. Disruption of Vascular Homeostasis in Patients With Kawasaki Disease: Involvement of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and Angiopoietins. Arthritis Rheumatism (2012) 64:306–15. doi: 10.1002/art.33316

  • 125

    HamamichiYIchidaFYuXHironoKIUeseKIHashimotoIet al. Neutrophils and Mononuclear Cells Express Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in Acute Kawasaki Disease: its Possible Role in Progression of Coronary Artery Lesions. Pediatr Res (2001) 49:7480. doi: 10.1203/00006450-200101000-00017

  • 126

    MaenoNTakeiSMasudaKAkaikeHMatsuoKKitajimaIet al. Increased Serum Levels of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in Kawasaki Disease. Pediatr Res (1998) 44:596–9. doi: 10.1203/00006450-199810000-00021

  • 127

    OhnoTYugeTKariyazonoHIgarashiHJoh-oKKinugawaNet al. Serum Hepatocyte Growth Factor Combined With Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor as a Predictive Indicator for the Occurrence of Coronary Artery Lesions in Kawasaki Disease. Eur J Pediatr (2002) 161:105–11. doi: 10.1007/s00431-001-0860-1

  • 128

    SuYFengSQLuoLLiuRXYiQJ. Association Between IL-35 and Coronary Arterial Lesions in Children With Kawasaki Disease. Clin Exp Med (2019) 19:8792. doi: 10.1007/s10238-018-0513-6

  • 129

    UenoKNomuraYHashiguchiTMasudaKMoritaYHazekiDet al. Platelet Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor is a Useful Predictor for Prognosis in Kawasaki Syndrome. Br J Haematol (2010) 148:285–92. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2009.07922.x

  • 130

    ZengHWeiR. Relationship Between Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and Vascular Injury of Children Kawasaki Disease. Int J Rheumatic Dis (2016) 19:153. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.12962

  • 131

    AkarSSolmazDBulbulHUsluSKozaciDKaracaNet al. Serum Level of the Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor is Elevated in Ankylosing Spondylitis and Osteocalcin may be Related With Osteoproliferation. Int J Rheumatic Dis (2016) 19:239. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.12962

  • 132

    GoldbergerCDulakJDuftnerCWeidingerFFalkenbachASchirmerM. Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) in Ankylosing Spondylitis–a Pilot Study. Wien Med Wochenschr (2002) 152:223–5. doi: 10.1046/j.1563-258x.2002.01118.x

  • 133

    LinTTLuJQiCYYuanLLiXLXiaLPet al. Elevated Serum Level of IL-27 and VEGF in Patients With Ankylosing Spondylitis and Associate With Disease Activity. Clin Exp Med (2015) 15:227–31. doi: 10.1007/s10238-014-0281-x

  • 134

    Przepiera-BedzakHFischerKBrzoskoM. EGF, Basic FGF, and Acidic FGF Levels and Their Association With Disease Activity and Extra-Articular Symptoms in Ankylosing Spondylitis. Polskie Archiwum Medycyny Wewnetrznej-Polish Arch Internal Med (2016) 126:290–2. doi: 10.20452/pamw.3341

  • 135

    Przepiera-BedzakHFischerKBrzoskoM. Serum IL-6 and IL-23 Levels and Their Correlation With Angiogenic Cytokines and Disease Activity in Ankylosing Spondylitis, Psoriatic Arthritis, and SAPHO Syndrome. Mediators Inflammation (2015) 2015:785705. doi: 10.1155/2015/785705

  • 136

    Przepiera-BedzakHFischerKBrzoskoM. Serum Interleukin-18, Fetuin-a, Soluble Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1, and Endothelin-1 in Ankylosing Spondylitis, Psoriatic Arthritis, and SAPHO Syndrome. Int J Mol Sci (2016) 17:1255. doi: 10.3390/ijms17081255

  • 137

    SakellariouGTIliopoulosAKonstaMKenanidisEPotoupnisMTsiridisEet al. Serum Levels of Dkk-1, Sclerostin and VEGF in Patients With Ankylosing Spondylitis and Their Association With Smoking, and Clinical, Inflammatory and Radiographic Parameters. Joint Bone Spine (2017) 84:309–15. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2016.05.008

  • 138

    SolmazDBulbulHUsluSKozaciLDKaracaNAkarS. Serum Level of The Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor is Elevated in Ankylosing Spondylitis And Osteocalcin May be Related Wth Osteoproliferation. Ann Rheumatic Dis (2015) 74:943–. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-eular.4931

  • 139

    SolmazDUsluSKozaciDKaracaNBulbulHTarhanEFet al. Evaluation of Periostin and Factors Associated With New Bone Formation in Ankylosing Spondylitis: Periostin may be Associated With the Wnt Pathway. Int J Rheumatic Dis (2018) 21:502–9. doi: 10.1111/1756-185x.13186

  • 140

    TorresLKlingbergENurkkalaMCarlstenHForsblad-d’EliaH. Hepatocyte Growth Factor is a Potential Biomarker for Osteoproliferation and Osteoporosis in Ankylosing Spondylitis. Osteoporosis Int (2019) 30:441–9. doi: 10.1007/s00198-018-4721-4

  • 141

    AksoyEKCetinkayaHSavasBEnsariATorgutalpvMEfeC. Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor, Endostatin Levels and Clinical Features Among Patients With Ulcerative Colitis and Irritable Bowel Syndrome and Among Healthy Controls: A Cross-Sectional Analytical Study. Sao Paulo Med J (2018) 136:543–50. doi: 10.1590/1516-3180.2018.0274161118

  • 142

    AlgabaALinaresPMEncarnacion Fernandez-ContrerasMFiguerolaACalvetXGuerraIet al. The Effects of Infliximab or Adalimumab on Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and Angiopoietin 1 Angiogenic Factor Levels in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Serial Observations in 37 Patients. Inflammatory Bowel Dis (2014) 20:695702. doi: 10.1097/mib.0000000000000004

  • 143

    Di SabatinoACiccocioppoRArmelliniEMoreraRRicevutiLCazzolaPet al. Serum bFGF and VEGF Correlate Respectively With Bowel Wall Thickness and Intramural Blood Flow in Crohn’s Disease. Inflammation Bowel Dis (2004) 10:573–7. doi: 10.1097/00054725-200409000-00011

  • 144

    Dueñas PousaIMaté JiménezJSalcedo MoraXAbreuMTMoreno OteroRGisbertJP. Analysis of Soluble Angiogenic Factors in Crohn’s Disease: A Preliminary Study. Gastroenterol Hepatol (2007) 30:518–24. doi: 10.1157/13111682

  • 145

    FerranteMPierikMHenckaertsLJoossensMClaesKVan SchuerbeekNet al. The Role of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Inflammation Bowel Dis (2006) 12:870–8. doi: 10.1097/01.mib.0000235095.01608.10

  • 146

    GrigaTGutzeitASommerkampCMayB. Increased Production of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor by Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol (1999) 11:175–9. doi: 10.1097/00042737-199902000-00019

  • 147

    GrigaTTrommASprangerJMayB. Increased Serum Levels of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Scand J Gastroenterol (1998) 33:504–8. doi: 10.1080/00365529850172070

  • 148

    KanazawaSTsunodaTOnumaEMajimaTKagiyamaMKikuchiK. VEGF. basic-FGF, and TGF-beta in Crohn’s Disease and Ulcerative Colitis: A Novel Mechanism of Chronic Intestinal Inflammation. Am J Gastroenterol (2001) 96:822–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.03527.x

  • 149

    KapsoritakisASfiridakiAMaltezosESimopoulosKGiatromanolakiASivridisEet al. Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Int J Colorectal Dis (2003) 18:418–22. doi: 10.1007/s00384-003-0495-y

  • 150

    KleinerGZaninVMonastaLCrovellaSCarusoLMilaniDet al. Pediatric Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease Exhibit Increased Serum Levels of Proinflammatory Cytokines and Chemokines, But Decreased Circulating Levels of Macrophage Inhibitory Protein-1β, Interleukin-2 and Interleukin-17. Exp Ther Med (2015) 9:2047–52. doi: 10.3892/etm.2015.2370

  • 151

    MagroFAraujoFPereiraPMeirelesEDiniz-RibeiroMVelosomFT. Soluble Selectins, sICAM, sVCAM, and Angiogenic Proteins in Different Activity Groups of Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Dig Dis Sci (2004) 49:1265–74. doi: 10.1023/b:ddas.0000037822.55717.31

  • 152

    PousaIDAlgabaALinaresPMSanz-CamenoPMateJMoreno-OteroRet al. Corticosteroids Modulate Angiogenic Soluble Factors in Ulcerative Colitis Patients. Digestive Dis Sci (2011) 56:871–9. doi: 10.1007/s10620-010-1327-x

  • 153

    PousaIDMateJSalcedo-MoraXAbreuMTMoreno-OteroRGisbertJP. Role of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and Angiopoietin Systems in Serum of Crohn’s Disease Patients. Inflammatory Bowel Dis (2008) 14:61–7. doi: 10.1002/ibd.20269

  • 154

    Schurer-MalyCCFriedMMalyFEBinekJFrenzerA. Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in Serum of Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease [1]. Scandinavian J Gastroenterol (1997) 32:959–60. doi: 10.3109/00365529709011209

  • 155

    deZoetenEFBattistaKDColsonSBLovellMAKesslerBEIsfortRWet al. Markers of Hypoxia Correlate With Histologic and Endoscopic Severity of Colitis in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Hypoxia (Auckl) (2020) 8:112. doi: 10.2147/hp.S219049

  • 156

    Wiercinska-DrapaloAJaroszewiczJParfieniukALapinskiTWRogalskaMProkopowiczD. Pigment Epithelium-Derived Factor in Ulcerative Colitis: Possible Relationship With Disease Activity. Regul Peptides (2007) 140:14. doi: 10.1016/j.regpep.2006.11.006

  • 157

    AkmanADicleOYilmazFCoskunMYilmazE. Discrepant Levels of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in Psoriasis Patients Treated With PUVA, Re-PUVA and Narrow-Band UVB. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed (2008) 24:123–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0781.2008.00349.x

  • 158

    AndersonKSPeterssonSWongJShubbarELokkoNNCarlstromMet al. Elevation of Serum Epidermal Growth Factor and Interleukin 1 Receptor Antagonist in Active Psoriasis Vulgaris. Br J Dermatol (2010) 163:1085–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2010.09990.x

  • 159

    Batycka-BaranAPaprockaMBaranWSzepietowskiJC. Decreased Number of Circulating Endothelial Progenitor Cells (CD133+/KDR+) in Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis. Acta Dermato-Venereol (2016) 96:754–7. doi: 10.2340/00015555-2353

  • 160

    Batycka-BaranAPaprockaMKrawczenkoAKantorADusDSzepietowskiJC. Reduced Number of Circulating Endothelial Progenitor Cells (CD133+/KDR+) in Patients With Plaque Psoriasis. Dermatology (2012) 225:8892. doi: 10.1159/000341534

  • 161

    CapkinAADemirSMenteseABulutCAyarA. Can Signal peptide-CUB-EGF Domain-Containing Protein (SCUBE) Levels be a Marker of Angiogenesis in Patients With Psoriasis? Arch Dermatol Res (2017) 309:203–7. doi: 10.1007/s00403-017-1722-7

  • 162

    BhushanMMcLaughlinBWeissJBGriffithsCE. Levels of Endothelial Cell Stimulating Angiogenesis Factor and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor are Elevated in Psoriasis. Br J Dermatol (1999) 141:1054–60. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2133.1999.03205.x

  • 163

    CreamerDAllenMJaggarRStevensRBicknellRBarkerJ. Mediation of Systemic Vascular Hyperpermeability in Severe Psoriasis by Circulating Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor. Arch Dermatol (2002) 138:791–6. doi: 10.1001/archderm.138.6.791

  • 164

    FlisiakIZaniewskiPRogalskaMMysliwiecHJaroszewiczJChodynickaB. Effect of Psoriasis Activity on VEGF and its Soluble Receptors Concentrations in Serum and Plaque Scales. Cytokine (2010) 52:225–9. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2010.09.012

  • 165

    FinkAMCauzaEHassfeldWDunkyABayerPMJureckaWet al. Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol (2007) 25:305–8.

  • 166

    KaurSZilmerKLepingVZilmerM. Comparative Study of Systemic Inflammatory Responses in Psoriasis Vulgaris and Mild to Moderate Allergic Contact Dermatitis. Dermatology (2012) 225:5461. doi: 10.1159/000339866

  • 167

    MekiARAl-ShobailiH. Serum Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor, Transforming Growth Factor β1, and Nitric Oxide Levels in Patients With Psoriasis Vulgaris: Their Correlation to Disease Severity. J Clin Lab Anal (2014) 28:496501. doi: 10.1002/jcla.21717

  • 168

    MiddeHSPriyadarssiniMRajappaMMunisamyMRajPSMSinghSet al. Interleukin-9 Serves as a Key Link Between Systemic Inflammation and Angiogenesis in Psoriasis. Clin Exp Dermatol. (2021) 46(1):50–7. doi: 10.1111/ced.14335

  • 169

    NielsenHJChristensenIJSvendsenMNHansenUWertherKBrünnerNet al. Elevated Plasma Levels of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1 Decrease During Improvement of Psoriasis. Inflammation Res (2002) 51:563–7. doi: 10.1007/pl00012428

  • 170

    NofalAAl-MakhzangyIAttwaENassarAAbdalmoatiA. Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in Psoriasis: An Indicator of Disease Severity and Control. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol (2009) 23:803–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2009.03181.x

  • 171

    Przepiera-BedzakHFischerKBrzoskoM. Serum Levels of Angiogenic Cytokines in Psoriatic Arthritis and SAPHO Syndrome. Polskie Archiwum Medycyny Wewnetrznej-Polish Arch Internal Med (2013) 123:297302. doi: 10.20452/pamw.1772

  • 172

    Shahidi-DadrasMHaghighatkhahHRAbdollahimajdFYounespourSKiaMPZargariO. Correlation Between Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and Subclinical Atherosclerosis in Patients With Psoriasis. Int J Dermatol (2016) 55:52–9. doi: 10.1111/ijd.12842

  • 173

    Shahidi-DadrasMAbdollahimajdFYounespourSNikvarM. Serum Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in Iranian Patients With Moderate-Severe Psoriasis Before and After Treatment: A Pasi-75 Response as a Practical Treatment Goal. Iranian J Dermatol (2016) 19:119–24.

  • 174

    TakahashiHTsujiHHashimotoYIshida-YamamotoAIizukaH. Serum Cytokines and Growth Factor Levels in Japanese Patients With Psoriasis. Clin Exp Dermatol (2010) 35:645–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2230.2009.03704.x

  • 175

    ZhengYZChenCFJiaLYYuTGSunJWangXY. Correlation Between microRNA-143 in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells and Disease Severity in Patients With Psoriasis Vulgaris. Oncotarget (2017) 8:51288–95. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.17260

  • 176

    Figueroa-VegaNSanz-CamenoPMoreno-OteroRSanchez-MadridFGonzalez-AmaroRMarazuelaM. Serum Levels of Angiogenic Molecules in Autoimmune Thyroid Diseases and Their Correlation With Laboratory and Clinical Features. J Clin Endocrinol Metab (2009) 94:1145–53. doi: 10.1210/jc.2008-1571

  • 177

    IitakaMMiuraSYamanakaKKawasakiSKitahamaSKawakamiYet al. Increased Serum Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Levels and Intrathyroidal Vascular Area in Patients With Graves’ Disease and Hashimoto’s Thyroiditis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab (1998) 83:3908–12. doi: 10.1210/jcem.83.11.5281

  • 178

    KajdaniukDMarekBNiedziolka-ZielonkaDFoltynWNowakMSieminskaLet al. Transforming Growth Factor Beta 1 (TGF Beta 1) and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) in the Blood of Healthy People and Patients With Graves’ Orbitopathy - a New Mechanism of Glucocorticoids Action? Endokrynol Polska (2014) 65:348–56. doi: 10.5603/ep.2014.0048

  • 179

    RancierMZaaberIStathopoulouMGChatelinJSalehAMarmouchHet al. Pro- and Anti-Angiogenic VEGF mRNAs in Autoimmune Thyroid Diseases. Autoimmunity (2016) 49:366–72. doi: 10.1080/08916934.2016.1199019

  • 180

    YeXLiuJWangYBinLWangJ. Increased Serum VEGF and b-FGF in Graves’ Ophthalmopathy. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol (2014) 252:1639–44. doi: 10.1007/s00417-014-2662-y

  • 181

    BreunisWBBiezeveldMHGeisslerJOttenkampJKuipersIMLamJet al. Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Gene Haplotypes in Kawasaki Disease. Arthritis Rheumatol (2006) 54:1588–94. doi: 10.1002/art.21811

  • 182

    LeungDWCachianesGKuangWJGoeddelDVFerraraN. Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor is a Secreted Angiogenic Mitogen. Science (1989) 246:1306–9. doi: 10.1126/science.2479986

  • 183

    DanveAO’DellJ. The Ongoing Quest for Biomarkers in Ankylosing Spondylitis. Int J Rheum Dis (2015) 18:826–34. doi: 10.1111/1756-185x.12779

  • 184

    HuangSMLiaoWTLinCFSunHSChowNH. Effectiveness and Mechanism of Preoperative Lugol Solution for Reducing Thyroid Blood Flow in Patients With Euthyroid Graves’ Disease. World J Surgery (2016) 40:505–9. doi: 10.1007/s00268-015-3298-8

  • 185

    BerrahmouneHLamontJVHerbethBFitzGeraldPSVisvikis-SiestS. Biological Determinants of and Reference Values for Plasma interleukin-8, Monocyte Chemoattractant protein-1, Epidermal Growth Factor, and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor: Results From the STANISLAS Cohort. Clin Chem (2006) 52:504–10. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2005.055798

Summary

Keywords

diagnosis, disease activity, autoimmune disease, vascular endothelial growth factor, angiogenesis

Citation

Zhan H, Li H, Liu C, Cheng L, Yan S and Li Y (2021) Association of Circulating Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Levels With Autoimmune Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front. Immunol. 12:674343. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.674343

Received

01 March 2021

Accepted

27 April 2021

Published

27 May 2021

Volume

12 - 2021

Edited by

Antonio Serrano, Research Institute Hospital 12 de Octubre, Spain

Reviewed by

Wang-Dong Xu, Southwest Medical University, China; Shi-Yang Guan, Anhui Medical University, China

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Yongzhe Li,

†These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship

This article was submitted to Autoimmune and Autoinflammatory Disorders, a section of the journal Frontiers in Immunology

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics