Abstract
Objective:
To investigate the Interaction between chronic endometritis (CE) caused endometrial microbiota disorder and endometrial immune environment change in recurrent implantation failure (RIF).
Method:
Transcriptome sequencing analysis of the endometrial of 112 patients was preform by using High-Throughput Sequencing. The endometrial microbiota of 43 patients was analyzed by using 16s rRNA sequencing technology.
Result:
In host endometrium, CD4 T cell and macrophage exhibited significant differences abundance between CE and non-CE patients. The enrichment analysis indicated differentially expressed genes mainly enriched in immune-related functional terms. Phyllobacterium and Sphingomonas were significantly high infiltration in CE patients, and active in pathways related to carbohydrate metabolism and/or fat metabolism. The increased synthesis of lipopolysaccharide, an important immunomodulator, was the result of microbial disorders in the endometrium.
Conclusion:
The composition of endometrial microorganisms in CE and non-CE patients were significantly different. Phyllobacterium and Sphingomonas mainly regulated immune cells by interfering with the process of carbohydrate metabolism and/or fat metabolism in the endometrium. CE endometrial microorganisms might regulate Th17 response and the ratio of Th1 to Th17 through lipopolysaccharide (LPS).
Introduction
Recurrent implantation failure (RIF) is usually defined as a woman under 40 who has received at least 4 high-quality embryos in at least three fresh or frozen cycles or has transferred more than 10 high-quality embryos and still cannot obtain a clinical pregnancy (–). Recent studies had confirmed that chronic endometritis (CE) was an important cause of recurrent reproductive failure (included recurrent miscarriage and recurrent implantation failure) (). Chronic endometritis (CE) was a persistent inflammation of the endometrium, and CD138 immunohistochemical (IHC) staining of plasma cells was a more accurate and sensitive diagnostic method for the diagnosis of CE (–).
Multiple studies had shown that a good balance of innate and adaptive local and peripheral immune systems was the basis for a successful pregnancy (, ). The study by Yuye Li et al. showed that the abundance of endometrial immune cells in CE patients was increased, and the high abundance of immune cells might be related to decreased endometrial receptivity and repeated pregnancy failures ().
It was now clear that microorganisms affect immunity (, ). It also knew that disturbances in the balance between the microbiota and the immune system might lead to inappropriate immune responses or excessive inflammation, or down-regulation of the immune response and pathogenic bacteria’s dominance of normal symbionts “ecological disorders” (). However, the mechanism of action of endometrial microbiota in RIF patients with CE remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to explore the regulation of endometrial microbes on the endometrial immune cells of RIF patients with CE.
Method
Collection of Research Subjects and Ethical Approval
The RIF cohort selected patients who underwent frozen embryo transfer (FET) in Reproductive Medicine Center, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, with the inclusion criteria. (a). At least four good-quality embryos were accepted in at least three fresh or frozen cycles, but still not pregnant. (b). Normal ovarian reserve function (levels of follicle stimulation hormone (FSH) <12 mIU/ml and AMH >1.1 ng/ml). (c). Confirmed by the examination (ultrasound or hysteroscopy) confirms that the uterine cavity was in normal shape. (d). Normal chromosome karyotype. (e). No antibiotics were received in the month before collection. (f). All patients were examined for cervical and vaginal secretions one month and one week before the embryo transplant to rule out infectious diseases.
The Ethics Committee approved the study of Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University. All patients were fully informed and voluntarily participate in the study and sign an informed consent form. At the same time, this study did not cover any research products.
Sample Collection Procession
Endometrial specimens were collected on LH+7 (natural cycles) or P+5 (artificial hormone cycle) according to the process (described in Supplementary Data Sheet 1) and stored at -20°C.
Host RNA Extraction and Sequencing
After completing the library construction according to the manufacturer’s instructions (as described in Supplementary Data Sheet 1), pair-end sequencing was performed on the HiSeq 2500 platform (Illumina).
Host RNA-Seq Analysis
FASTQ files were processed by fastp (), Bowite2 (), HISAT2 () and StringTie (, ) to get the count matrix (as described in Supplementary Data Sheet 1). The human genome GRCh38 from Gencode v26 was used as the reference genome. Then the count value of gene expression was normalized to TPM (Transcripts Per Kilobase of exon model per Million mapped reads) value.
Selection of Differentially Expressed Genes and Functional Enrichment Analysis
The differentially expressed genes between CE and non-CE patients were selected by using DESeq2 () R package with the p value < 0.05 and log fold change >1 as cut-off. Then functional enrichment analysis of DEGs was performed by clusterprofiler R package () and OmicShare tool (http://www.omicshare.com/tools).
Calculation of Endometrial Immune Cells Infiltration
CIBERSORT is a tool that can estimate the abundances of 22 types of immune cells, including seven T cell types, naïve and memory B cells, plasma cells, NK cells, and myeloid subsets (). By using CIBERSORT, the infiltration of immune cells in endometrium was calculated. To understand the consistence of T cells, we also used ImmuCellAI web tools which included 18 T-cell subtypes () to calculate the infiltration of subtypes of T-cells.
16S rRNA Extraction and Sequencing
After completing the library construction according to the manufacturer’s instructions with the universal primers 341F (5′-CCTACGGGNGGCWGCAG-3′)and 806R(5′-GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT-3′)(as described in Supplementary Data Sheet 1), NovaSeq 6000 was used for high throughput sequencing.
Endometrial Microbiota Analysis
Endometrial microbiota analysis was processed following QIIME2 analysis pipeline (as described in Supplementary Data Sheet 1) ().
The differential abundance of endometrial microbiota was selected using LEfSe (Linear discriminant analysis Effect Size) ().
PICRUSt2 (Phylogenetic Investigation of Communities by Reconstruction of Unobserved States) () was used to predict the functional profiles of the endometrial microbes. Different metacyc () functional profiles were screened by STAMP software (version 2.1.3) ().
Results
Endometrial Transcriptome Analysis
A total of 112 subjects (included 32 CE patients and 72 non-CE patients) were recruited in this study. After obtaining the gene expression matrix, we obtained 93 differentially expressed genes through DESeq2 (logFC ≥ |1|, p < 0,05 [Figure 1A, Supplementary Table 1)]. By functional enrichment analysis, we found that DEGs were mainly enriched in the immune and inflammatory-related GO (Gene Ontology) terms, such as immune response (GO:0006955), immune system process (GO:0002376), and inflammatory response (GO: 0006954) (Figure 1B, Supplementary Table 2). The top 20 enriched pathways were showed in Figure 1D and the interaction network of these pathways was described in Figure 1C. Most of these pathways were also related to inflammation and immune processes in the endometrium.
Figure 1
Calculation of Endometrial Immune Cells Infiltration
To further explore the infiltration of immune cells in the endometrium, we used COBERSORT to calculate the degree of infiltration of 22 immune cells (Figure 2A). The infiltration of memory CD4 T cells and Macrophages was a significant difference between the two groups (Figure 2B). We also used ImmuCellAI to estimate the infiltration of 18 subtypes of T cells (Supplementary Table 3).
Figure 2
Endometrial Microbiota Analysis
We performed 16s rRNA sequencing on the endometrial microbiota of 43 patients (14 CE patients and 29 non-CE patients). As the rarefaction curve was shown (Supplementary Figure 1), the 16s rRNA sequencing in this study had sufficient sequencing depth. The top 15 phylum and top 20 Genus were shown in Figures 3A, B. The α diversity of the endometrium microbiota calculated by Simpson showed that there was no significant difference in species diversity between the two groups of feature level (Figure 3C), phylum level (Figure 3D), and genus level (Figure 3E) (T-test).
Figure 3
Based on the results of LEfSe (LDA ≥ 2), the abundance of Phyllobacterium and Sphingomonas was significantly increased in CE patients (Figure 3F). Spearman correlation analysis was performed by using the cor. test() function with a two-sided alternative hypothesis to analyze the relationship between the immune cells and genus selected by LEfSe. Compared with other methods (such as Pearson), the normalized count (gene expression) and component data (relative abundance of microbiota) of Spearman’s correlation analysis performed better (). Cytoscape software () was used to visualize the results of the analysis.
Based on the Metacyc database, PICRUST2 was used to analyze the metabolic function of the endometrial microbiota. Through the STAMP software, we found that the CE group was mainly enriched in the sucrose biosynthesis III pathway (PWY-7347) and sucrose biosynthesis I pathway (SUCSYN-PWY) (Welch’s t-test, p < 0.05, Figure 4A and Supplementary Table 4).
Figure 4
Interaction Between Endometrial Immune Cell and Microbiota
The marker genes of immune cells were obtained from a previous study (). The correlation network between the selected Genus and the marker genes of immune cells was constructed by Spearman analysis (Figure 4B). We found that Phyllobacterium and Sphingomonas had similar relationships with immune cells, and they were mainly positively related to dendritic cells (DC), natural killer (NK) cells, iTreg cells and B cells. These two genera were negatively correlated to macrophage cells.
In the host’s pathway analysis, T cell-related signaling pathways show an important position. After calculating the abundance of 18 T cell subtypes using ImmuCellAI, we analyzed the related genus of several subtypes reported in other studies () included Th1, Th17, and T regular (Treg) (Figure 5 and Supplementary Table 5). Endometrial microbiota in patients with high Th1 abundance (Figure 5B) was active in several glycolysis-related pathways, including super pathway of thiamine diphosphate biosynthesis I (THISYN-PWY), reductive TCA cycle I (P23-PWY), super pathway of L-aspartate and L-asparagine biosynthesis (ASPASN-PWY) and purine nucleobases degradation I (P164-PWY) (Figure 5A). The PWY-7332 pathway, which was highly active in the endometrium of patients with high abundance of Th17, was a super pathway for the synthesis of Lipopolysaccharides (LPS), which is an important immunomodulator (Figures 5C, E).
Figure 5
Discussion
Chronic endometritis (CE) is an important factor for recurrent implantation failure (). The endometrium of CE patients showed a high abundance of immune cell infiltration, which would cause a decrease in the receptivity of the endometrium, an important feature of recurrent implantation failure (). It has been proven that immune adaptation, one of the key mechanisms for the establishment and maintenance of pregnancy, was directly affected by local microorganisms (). In this study, we combined the endometrial transcriptome and microbial diversity analysis to illustrate that endometrial microbiota regulated the abundance of endometrial immune cells through metabolic activities.
The functional enrichment analysis of differential genes in the endometrial transcriptome showed that the functions of DEGs were mainly enriched in immune and inflammation-related items. In the network diagram of enriched pathways, cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction and Toll-like receptor signaling pathway were the central pathways in the network. Toll-like receptors (TLRs) are the first line of defense against pathogen invasion and play a key role in inflammation, immune cell regulation, survival, and proliferation (). This is the result of the body’s defense during endometritis. At the same time, this pathway and cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction played an important role in the regulation of T cell plasticity and differentiation (, ). After calculating the infiltration of endometrial immune cells by CIBERSORT, we found that resting CD4 memory T cells was high infiltration in the non-CE group. This might indicate that in CE, CD4 T cells are significantly activated due to inflammation. This was consistent with the conclusion of another study ().
It has been proven that bacteria can affect immunity (, ). We introduced 16s rRNA sequencing technology to analyze the impact of endometrial microbiota on immune cells. The results of LEfSe showed that the abundance of Phyllobacterium and Sphingomonas in the CE group was significantly higher than that in the non-CE group. In the network diagram of the relationship between different genus and immune cell marker genes, we found that Phyllobacterium and Sphingomonas had a significant positive correlation with B cells. Since the infiltration of plasma cells in the endometrial stroma was considered a characteristic of endometritis (), it confirmed that these two different genera played an important role in endometritis.
At the same time, we noticed a significant positive correlation between Sphingomonas and uterus NK (uNK) cells. In addition, in the differential analysis of the transcriptome, the expression of CD16 (FcγRIII) in the CE group was significantly higher than that in the non-CE group. CD16+ is a characteristic of the uNK cell population that specifically kills infected cells (). The abnormal differentiation of uNK cells might lead to embryo implantation failure through the development of endometrial and/or decidual blood vessels and trophoblasts (). The study of May-Tal Sauerbrun-Cutler et al. showed that a higher level of CD16 + uNK cells was a risk factor for embryo transfer failure in infertile women before frozen embryo transfer (). Macrophage was known as a common anti-epidemic presenting cell (APC). It was the main cytokine producer in the human endometrium () and played an important role in the establishment of endometrial receptivity (). The results of this study suggested that Phyllobacterium and Sphingomonas were significantly negatively correlated with macrophages. This might be one of the important mechanisms of endometrial microbiota affecting endometrial receptivity.
It was known that metabolic activity had an important regulatory effect on immune cells (, ). Endometrial microbiota was metabolically active, and the crosstalk of metabolic activity might be an important way for endometrial microbiota to interact with endometrial immune cells. In the study, two metabolic pathways were highly active in the CE group, PWY-7347, and SUCSYN-PWY. SUCSYN-PWY described the process of generating sucrose by phosphoglycerol and 3-phospho-D-glyceric acid. The intermediate products included UDP-α-D-glucose. PWY-7347 described the process of glucose-6-phosphate and UDP-α-D-glucose to produce sucrose, and phosphate and UDP were produced in the middle. Obviously, these two metabolic pathways were interaction with glucose and lipid metabolism, which had been proved to be closely related to the regulation of T cells and macrophages (, ). These active microbiotas competed for energy materials of the host (including endometrial cells and immune cells) by consuming intermediate products of glycolysis.
Th1 is a subtype of CD4 T cells, and its increased abundance was considered to be unfavorable for embryo implantation (). In this study, we found that endometrial microorganisms with high Th1 abundance exhibited significant-high activity in many important metabolic pathways, including L-aspartic acid and L-asparagine biosynthesis, reducing TCA cycle, degradation of purine nucleobases, and biosynthesis of thiamine diphosphate. Obviously, this was related to multiple links in carbohydrate metabolism (including glycolysis). Therefore, the abnormal activities of the microbiota in the endometrium might regulate the conversion of Th1/Th2 by interfering with the process of carbohydrate metabolism and/or fat metabolism. In addition, Th17 and Treg also played an important role in the regulation of immune adaptation during embryo implantation, and the imbalance of Th17/Treg ratio would have an adverse effect on embryo implantation. In the study of intestinal microbes, the researchers confirmed that lipopolysaccharide (LPS) could induce a decrease in the number of Tregs and an increase in the number of Th17 and Th1 (). In our study, the endometrial microbiota of patients with high Th17 abundance was significantly active in the relevant pathways of LPS synthesis. It meant that the imbalance in the number and proportion of immune cells in the endometrium may be caused by a similar mechanism.
Conclusion
In this study, we combined the transcriptome and 16s rRNA sequencing technology to analyze the interaction between the endometrium microbial disorder caused by chronic endometritis and the immune cells in the endometrium of patients with recurrent implantation failure. We found that the composition of endometrial microorganisms in CE and non-CE patients were significantly different. Phyllobacterium and Sphingomonas mainly regulated immune cells by interfering with the process of carbohydrate metabolism and/or fat metabolism in the endometrium. The results of this study supplemented part of the mechanism of microbial regulation of the immune environment of the endometrium.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 81871214), the National Key R&D Program of China (grant no. 2017YFC1001603), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 81070495).
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Statements
Data availability statement
The transcriptome sequencing for 112 endometrium samples have been deposited with the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) under reference number PRJNA747622. The 16s rRNA gene sequencing for 43 endometrial microbiota samples have been deposited with the NCBI under reference number PRJNA732058.
Ethics statement
The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University. The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.
Author contributions
CF, TL, and PeC carried out the study. PeC and TL analyzed and interpreted the data and drafted the manuscript. YG and PaC collected and followed up the samples. TL and CF revised the manuscript. CF, TL, and PeC coordinated the study, participated in the design, and reviewed the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Acknowledgments
We thank Xukang Medical·Yikon Genomics for their assistance in the sequencing process.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2021.748447/full#supplementary-material
Supplementary Figure 1The rarefaction curve of 16s rRNA data.
Supplement Data Sheet 1Detailed description of Methods.
Supplementary Table 1Differentially expressed genes of DESeq2.
Supplementary Table 2The result table of functional enrichment analysis of DEGs.
Supplementary Table 3Infiltration of 18 subtypes of T cells.
Supplementary Table 4Comparison Results Table of PICRUST2 Metabolic Pathway.
Supplementary Table 5Comparison Results Table of PICRUST2 Metabolic Pathway of Th1, Th17, and Treg.
References
1
CoughlanCLedgerWWangQLiuFDemirolAGurganTet al. Recurrent Implantation Failure: Definition and Management. Reprod BioMed Online (2014) 28(1):14–38. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.08.011
2
SimonALauferN. Repeated Implantation Failure: Clinical Approach. Fertil Steril (2012) 97(5):1039–43. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.03.010
3
ThornhillARdeDie-SmuldersCEGeraedtsJPHarperJCHartonGLLaverySAet al. ESHRE PGD Consortium 'Best Practice Guidelines for Clinical Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD) and Preimplantation Genetic Screening (PGS)'. Hum Reprod (2005) 20(1):35–48. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deh579
4
LiYYuSHuangCLianRChenCLiuSet al. Evaluation of Peripheral and Uterine Immune Status of Chronic Endometritis in Patients With Recurrent Reproductive Failure. Fertil Steril (2020) 113(1):187–96.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.09.001
5
KitayaKYasuoT. Inter-Observer and Intra-Observer Variability in Immunohistochemical Detection of Endometrial Stromal Plasmacytes in Chronic Endometritis. Exp Ther Med (2013) 5(2):485–8. doi: 10.3892/etm.2012.824
6
Bayer-GarnerIBKorourianS. Plasma Cells in Chronic Endometritis are Easily Identified When Stained With Syndecan-1. Mod Pathol (2001) 14(9):877–9. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.3880405
7
Bayer-GarnerIBNickellJAKorourianS. Routine Syndecan-1 Immunohistochemistry Aids in the Diagnosis of Chronic Endometritis. Arch Pathol Lab Med (2004) 128(9):1000–3. doi: 10.5858/2004-128-1000-RSIAIT
8
KitayaKYasuoT. Aberrant Expression of Selectin E, CXCL1, and CXCL13 in Chronic Endometritis. Mod Pathol (2010) 23(8):1136–46. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2010.98
9
DisepBInnesBACochraneHRTijaniSBulmerJN. Immunohistochemical Characterization of Endometrial Leucocytes in Endometritis. Histopathology (2004) 45(6):625–32. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2004.02052.x
10
AghaeepourNGanioEAMcIlwainDTsaiASTingleMVan GassenSet al. An Immune Clock of Human Pregnancy. Sci Immunol (2017) 2(15):eaan2946. doi: 10.1126/sciimmunol.aan2946
11
PrabhuDasMBonneyECaronKDeySErlebacherAFazleabasAet al. Immune Mechanisms at the Maternal-Fetal Interface: Perspectives and Challenges. Nat Immunol (2015) 16(4):328–34. doi: 10.1038/ni.3131
12
HooperLVLittmanDRMacphersonAJ. Interactions Between the Microbiota and the Immune System. Science (2012) 336(6086):1268–73. doi: 10.1126/science.1223490
13
LittmanDRPamerEG. Role of the Commensal Microbiota in Normal and Pathogenic Host Immune Responses. Cell Host Microbe (2011) 10(4):311–23. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2011.10.004
14
Al-NasirySAmbrosinoESchlaepferMMorreSAWietenLVonckenJWet al. The Interplay Between Reproductive Tract Microbiota and Immunological System in Human Reproduction. Front Immunol (2020) 11:378. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00378
15
ChenSZhouYChenYGuJ. Fastp: An Ultra-Fast All-in-One FASTQ Preprocessor. Bioinformatics (2018) 34(17):i884–i90. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty560
16
LangmeadBSalzbergSL. Fast Gapped-Read Alignment With Bowtie 2. Nat Methods (2012) 9(4):357–9. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1923
17
KimDLangmeadBSalzbergSL. HISAT: A Fast Spliced Aligner With Low Memory Requirements. Nat Methods (2015) 12(4):357–60. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3317
18
PerteaMPerteaGMAntonescuCMChangTCMendellJTSalzbergSL. StringTie Enables Improved Reconstruction of a Transcriptome From RNA-Seq Reads. Nat Biotechnol (2015) 33(3):290–5. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3122
19
PerteaMKimDPerteaGMLeekJTSalzbergSL. Transcript-Level Expression Analysis of RNA-Seq Experiments With HISAT, StringTie and Ballgown. Nat Protoc (2016) 11(9):1650–67. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2016.095
20
LoveMIHuberWAndersS. Moderated Estimation of Fold Change and Dispersion for RNA-Seq Data With Deseq2. Genome Biol (2014) 15(12):550. doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8
21
YuGWangLGHanYHeQY. Clusterprofiler: An R Package for Comparing Biological Themes Among Gene Clusters. OMICS (2012) 16(5):284–7. doi: 10.1089/omi.2011.0118
22
NewmanAMLiuCLGreenMRGentlesAJFengWXuYet al. Robust Enumeration of Cell Subsets From Tissue Expression Profiles. Nat Methods (2015) 12(5):453–7. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3337
23
MiaoYRZhangQLeiQLuoMXieGYWangHet al. ImmuCellAI: A Unique Method for Comprehensive T-Cell Subsets Abundance Prediction and its Application in Cancer Immunotherapy. Adv Sci (Weinh) (2020) 7(7):1902880. doi: 10.1002/advs.201902880
24
BolyenERideoutJRDillonMRBokulichNAAbnetCCAl-GhalithGAet al. Reproducible, Interactive, Scalable and Extensible Microbiome Data Science Using QIIME 2. Nat Biotechnol (2019) 37(8):852–7. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0209-9
25
SegataNIzardJWaldronLGeversDMiropolskyLGarrettWSet al. Metagenomic Biomarker Discovery and Explanation. Genome Biol (2011) 12(6):R60. doi: 10.1186/gb-2011-12-6-r60
26
DouglasGMMaffeiVJZaneveldJRYurgelSNBrownJRTaylorCMet al. PICRUSt2 for Prediction of Metagenome Functions. Nat Biotechnol (2020) 38(6):685–8. doi: 10.1038/s41587-020-0548-6
27
CaspiRBillingtonRKeselerIMKothariAKrummenackerMMidfordPEet al. The MetaCyc Database of Metabolic Pathways and Enzymes - a 2019 Update. Nucleic Acids Res (2020) 48(D1):D445–D53. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz862
28
ParksDHTysonGWHugenholtzPBeikoRG. STAMP: Statistical Analysis of Taxonomic and Functional Profiles. Bioinformatics (2014) 30(21):3123–4. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu494
29
WeissSVan TreurenWLozuponeCFaustKFriedmanJDengYet al. Correlation Detection Strategies in Microbial Data Sets Vary Widely in Sensitivity and Precision. ISME J (2016) 10(7):1669–81. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2015.235
30
ShannonPMarkielAOzierOBaligaNSWangJTRamageDet al. Cytoscape: A Software Environment for Integrated Models of Biomolecular Interaction Networks. Genome Res (2003) 13(11):2498–504. doi: 10.1101/gr.1239303
31
TanBKVandekerckhovePKennedyRKeaySD. Investigation and Current Management of Recurrent IVF Treatment Failure in the UK. BJOG (2005) 112(6):773–80. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00523.x
32
FranasiakJMScottRT. Endometrial Microbiome. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol (2017) 29(3):146–52. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000357
33
KawaiTAkiraS. The Role of Pattern-Recognition Receptors in Innate Immunity: Update on Toll-Like Receptors. Nat Immunol (2010) 11(5):373–84. doi: 10.1038/ni.1863
34
DongC. Cytokine Regulation and Function in T Cells. Annu Rev Immunol (2021) 39:51–76. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-061020-053702
35
GreenwoodSMMoranJJ. Chronic Endometritis: Morphologic and Clinical Observations. Obstet Gynecol (1981) 58(2):176–84. doi: 10.1016/0378-5122(81)90041-4
36
HannaJMandelboimO. When Killers Become Helpers. Trends Immunol (2007) 28(5):201–6. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2007.03.005
37
El-AzzamyHDambaevaSVKatukurundageDSalazar GarciaMDSkariahAHusseinYet al. Dysregulated Uterine Natural Killer Cells and Vascular Remodeling in Women With Recurrent Pregnancy Losses. Am J Reprod Immunol (2018) 80(4):e13024. doi: 10.1111/aji.13024
38
Sauerbrun-CutlerMTHuberWJKruegerPMSungCJHasPSharmaS. Do Endometrial Natural Killer and Regulatory T Cells Differ in Infertile and Clinical Pregnancy Patients? An Analysis in Patients Undergoing Frozen Embryo Transfer Cycles. Am J Reprod Immunol (2021) 85(6):e13393. doi: 10.1111/aji.13393
39
KammererUvon WolffMMarkertUR. Immunology of Human Endometrium. Immunobiology (2004) 209(7):569–74. doi: 10.1016/j.imbio.2004.04.009
40
RobertsonSAMoldenhauerLM. Immunological Determinants of Implantation Success. Int J Dev Biol (2014) 58(2-4):205–17. doi: 10.1387/ijdb.140096sr
41
YanJHorngT. Lipid Metabolism in Regulation of Macrophage Functions. Trends Cell Biol (2020) 30(12):979–89. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2020.09.006
42
KempkesRWMJoostenIKoenenHHeX. Metabolic Pathways Involved in Regulatory T Cell Functionality. Front Immunol (2019) 10:2839. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02839
43
ChaouatG. The Th1/Th2 Paradigm: Still Important in Pregnancy? Semin Immunopathol (2007) 29(2):95–113. doi: 10.1007/s00281-007-0069-0
44
CandelliMFranzaLPignataroGOjettiVCovinoMPiccioniAet al. Interaction Between Lipopolysaccharide and Gut Microbiota in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. Int J Mol Sci (2021) 22(12). doi: 10.3390/ijms22126242
Summary
Keywords
chronic endometritis, endometrial microbiota, immune cells, recurrent implantation failure, host-microbiome association
Citation
Chen P, Chen P, Guo Y, Fang C and Li T (2021) Interaction Between Chronic Endometritis Caused Endometrial Microbiota Disorder and Endometrial Immune Environment Change in Recurrent Implantation Failure. Front. Immunol. 12:748447. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.748447
Received
28 July 2021
Accepted
13 September 2021
Published
04 October 2021
Volume
12 - 2021
Edited by
Juarez Antonio Simões Quaresma, Evandro Chagas Institute, Brazil
Reviewed by
Gulrukhsor Haybulloevna Tolibova, D. O. Ott Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology, Russia; Kotaro Kitaya, Reproduction Clinic Osaka, Japan
Updates
Copyright
© 2021 Chen, Chen, Guo, Fang and Li.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Tingting Li, litt33@mail.sysu.edu.cn; Cong Fang, fangcong@mail.sysu.edu.cn
This article was submitted to Microbial Immunology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Immunology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.