CORRECTION article

Front. Immunol., 16 January 2023

Sec. Autoimmune Disorders

Volume 13 - 2022 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.1113152

Corrigendum: Investigation of the association between the genetic polymorphisms of co-stimulatory system and systemic lupus erythematosus

  • 1. Department of Laboratory Medicine, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan

  • 2. Department of Medical Biotechnology and Laboratory Science, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan

  • 3. Division of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology, Chang Gung University and Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan

In the published article, there was an error. The TNFSF4 gene is reverse, in which the wild-type allele of rs1234314 is C rather than G and the wild-type allele of rs45454293 is C rather than G. Originally, the direction of the primer was wrong, so the allele on the sequence we read was followed by the error. Because the complementary base of C is G and rs45454293 is exactly C to G mutation, we didn’t find this error at that time. This mistake will cause the opposite result, leading to a misunderstanding about risk allele for SLE. Thus, there are 5 errors in the original manuscript needed to be corrected.

1. A correction has been made to the Abstract.

This sentence previously stated: “GG vs. CC: p=0.004; GG+ CG vs. CC: p=0.001”

The corrected sentence appears below: “CC vs. GG: p=0.004; CC+ CG vs. GG: p=0.001”.

2. A correction has been made to Results, The analysis of genotype frequencies.

This sentence previously stated: “Compared to the GG genotype, the subjects with the CC genotype would have a 4.4 times risk of SLE (95% CI =1.577-12.275, p = 0.004), which also had significance based on the dominant model (GG+CG vs. CC: OR = 4.362, 95% CI = 1.727-11.015, p = 0.001)”.

The corrected sentence appears below: “Compared to the CC genotype, the subjects with the GG genotype would have a 4.4 times risk of SLE (95% CI =1.577-12.275, p = 0.004), which also had significance based on the dominant model (CC+CG vs. GG: OR = 4.362, 95% CI = 1.727-11.015, p = 0.001)”.

3. A correction has been made to Discussion, paragraph 3. This sentence previously stated:

“It was shown that the CC genotype of rs1234314 provided a protective effect against allergic rhinitis (50), which was contrary to our result”.

The corrected sentence appears below:

“It was shown that the CC genotype of rs1234314 provided a protective effect against allergic rhinitis (50), which was the same as our result”.

4. In the published article, there was an error in Table 2 as published. The “SNP” and “Allele” columns of the TNFSF4 gene section previously contained the values “rs1234314 C/G and rs45454293 A/G” when they should contain the values “rs1234314 G/C and rs45454293 C/T”. The corrected Table 2 and its caption appears below.

Table 2

SNPPositionAlleleMinor allele frequencyHWE
p value
Odds ratiopa value
PatientControl(95%CI)
CTLA4
 rs11571315203866178C/T0.1480.3530.7100.318 (0.179-0.563)<0.001*
 rs733618203866221T/C0.4170.5730.8170.532 (0.335-0.845)0.007*
 rs4553808203866282A/G0.0070.1330.4120.045 (0.006-0.343)<0.001*
 rs11571316203866366A/G0.1570.2200.6540.661 (0.364-1.201)0.172
 rs62182595203866465A/G0.0070.1330.9460.047 (0.006-0.353)<0.001*
 rs16840252203866796C/T0.0210.1470.3300.126 (0.037-0.430)<0.001*
 rs5742909203867624C/T0.0790.1400.3700.524 (0.243-1.130)0.095
 rs231775203867991A/G0.3250.3490.9990.899 (0.542-1.488)0.678
 rs3087243203874196G/A0.2390.2270.7521.013 (0.589-1.740)0.964
 rs11571319203874215G/A0.1320.2800.8140.358 (0.196-0.655)0.001*
CD28
 rs1879877203705277G/T0.4660.4560.9911.083 (0.684-1.714)0.733
 rs3181096203705369C/T0.2470.2840.2200.826 (0.494-1.383)0.468
 rs3181097203705416G/A0.4190.4190.8951.000 (0.630-1.587)1.000
 rs3181098203705655G/A0.2770.2580.1641.109 (0.662-1.857)0.693
 rs56228674203729436C/T0.0330.0400.9790.828 (0.155-4.405)1.000
 rs3116496203729789T/C0.1070.1200.7930.876 (0.323-2.376)0.794
PDCD1
 rs5839828241859601G/GG0.3380.2890.8681.258 (0.761-2.079)0.371
 rs36084323241859444C/T0.4930.3170.9972.096 (1.293-3.397)0.003*
 rs41386349241851697G/A0.2220.1800.4701.302 (0.734-2.308)0.366
 rs6705653241851407T/C0.2850.2160.5721.443 (0.847-2.459)0.177
 rs2227982241851281G/A0.4710.3920.9531.384 (0.867-2.210)0.173
 rs2227981241851121A/G0.2610.2230.2971.232 (0.713-2.127)0.454
 rs10204525241850169C/T0.2500.2070.9901.280 (0.642-2.552)0.483
ICOS
 rs11571305203935403G/A0.2970.3360.007*0.836 (0.504-1.388)0.489
 rs11889352203935948T/A0.2540.2430.1261.059 (0.617-1.818)0.836
 rs11883722203936122G/A0.4180.4210.4910.985 (0.616-1.576)0.951
 rs10932029203937045T/C0.1640.1100.3501.586 (0.789-3.188)0.193
 rs10932035203959929G/A0.4630.500<0.001*0.833 (0.486-1.430)0.508
 rs10932036203960458A/T0.0470.0560.1540.844 (0.288-2.475)0.757
 rs4404254203960563T/C0.1920.2690.9950.646 (0.368-1.133)0.126
 rs10932037:203960623C/T0.0340.0820.6730.397 (0.134-1.173)0.085
 rs10932038203960861A/G0.0350.0770.5610.432 (0.144-1.298)0.125
 rs1559931203961006G/A0.1970.2270.9800.838 (0.467-1.505)0.555
 rs56259923203961015G/T0.0140.0160.9920.900 (0.125-6.484)1.000
 rs4675379203961372G/C0.1560.1610.5980.967 (0.393-2.381)0.942
TNFSF4
 rs1234314173208253G/C0.5140.3600.3951.881 (1.177-3.005)0.008*
 rs45454293173208097C/T0.1480.1600.9980.911 (0.482-1.722)0.774

The HWE analysis in control group and the allele frequencies in cases and controls.

The position was obtained from Genome Assembly GRCh38.p13. rs: reference SNP; HWE: Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium; 95% CI: 95% confidence interval; Pa values of allele frequency were counted from Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test. In the column of “Allele”, the bold was referred to minor allele, and the minor allele was referred to the allele with lower frequency in the population containing cases and controls. “*” was expressed as p<0.05.

5. In the published article, there was an error in Table 3 as published. The “Genotype” column of the TNFSF4 gene section had “GG” and “CC” in the wrong positions. The corrected Table 3 and its caption appears below.

Table 3

SNPGenotypeGenotype frequencyOdds ratio
95% CI.
p value
PatientControl
CTLA4
 rs11571315CC vs. CT vs. TT0.001*
TT5333Ref.1.000
CT15310.301 (0.142-0.641)0.001
CC3110.170 (0.044-0.654)0.005**
TT vs. CT + CC0.267 (0.132-0.539)<0.001*
TT + CT vs. CC0.257 (0.068-0.962)0.032*
 rs733618CC vs. CT vs. TT0.002*
CC3315Ref.1.000
CT18340.241 (0.104-0.555)0.001*
TT21260.367 (0.159-0.849)0.018*
CC vs. CT + TT0.295 (0.142-0.614)0.001*
CC + CT vs. TT0.776 (0.387-1.556)0.475
 rs4553808AA vs. AG vs. GG<0.001*
AA7155Ref.1.000
AG1200.039 (0.005-0.298)<0.001*
GG00NANA
AA vs. AG+GG0.039 (0.005-0.298)<0.001*
AA+AG vs. GGNANA
 rs62182595GG vs. AG vs. AA<0.001*
GG6956Ref.1.000
AG1180.045 (0.006-0.348)<0.001**
AA01NA0.452
GG vs. AG+AA0.043 (0.006-0.329)<0.001*
GG+AG vs. AANA1.000
 rs16840252CC vs. CT vs. TT<0.001*
CC6953Ref.1.000
CT1220.035 (0.005-0.267)<0.001*
TT10NA1.000
CC vs. CT + TT0.070 (0.016-0.310)<0.001*
CC + CT vs. TTNA0.486
 rs5742909CC vs. CT vs. TT0.051
CC6054Ref.1.000
CT9210.386 (0.163-0.914)0.027*
TT10NA1.000
CC vs. CT + TT0.429 (0.185-0.991)0.044*
CC + CT vs. TTNA0.493
 rs11571319GG vs. AG vs. AA<0.001*
GG5840Ref.1.000
AG2280.049 (0.011-0.219)<0.001*
AA870.788 (0.265-2.348)0.669
GG vs. AG+AA0.197 (0.088-0.443)<0.001*
GG+AG vs. AA1.295 (0.443-3.784)0.636
PDCD1
 rs36084323CC vs. CT vs. TT0.013*
TT1933Ref.1.000
CT34311.905 (0.904-4.014)0.089
CC1874.466 (1.579-12.631)0.004*
TT vs. CT+CC2.377 (1.177-4.798)0.015*
TT+CT vs. TT3.105 (1.206-7.996)0.015*
TNFSF4
 rs1234314CC vs. CG vs. GG0.005*
CC2028Ref.1.000
CG29401.015 (0.481-2.142)0.969
GG2274.400 (1.577-12.275)0.004*
CC vs. CG+ GG1.519 (0.756-3.051)0.239
CC+ CG vs.GG4.362 (1.727-11.015)0.001*

Genotype frequencies of the significant SNPs in SLE cases and healthy controls.

95% CI, 95% confidence interval; NA, not applicable. “*” was expressed as p<0.05.

6. In the published article, there was an error in Table 4 as published. The last row of the “Haplotypes” column previously contained “G”s instead of “C”s.

Table 4

HaplotypesFreq. CasesFreq. ControlsOR95% CI.p value
Ars62182595Trs168402520.0140.2530.0420.005-0.324<0.001
Ars62182595Crs168402520.0140.2530.0420.005-0.324<0.001
Grs62182595Trs168402520.0140.2800.0370.005-0.286<0.001
Crs1234314Crs454542930.6900.9070.2290.091-0.5790.001

Genotype frequencies of the significant SNPs in SLE cases and healthy controls.

Freq., frequency; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

The corrected Table 4 and its caption appears below.

The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

Statements

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Summary

Keywords

systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), co-stimulatory/co-inhibitory molecules, single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), autoimmune disease (AD), association

Citation

Chen D-P, Lin W-T and Yu K-H (2023) Corrigendum: Investigation of the association between the genetic polymorphisms of co-stimulatory system and systemic lupus erythematosus. Front. Immunol. 13:1113152. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1113152

Received

01 December 2022

Accepted

07 December 2022

Published

16 January 2023

Volume

13 - 2022

Edited and reviewed by

Zhiwei Xu, The University of Queensland, Australia

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Kuang-Hui Yu,

This article was submitted to Autoimmune and Autoinflammatory Disorders: Autoimmune Disorders, a section of the journal Frontiers in Immunology

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics