Abstract
Introduction:
Most T lymphocytes, including regulatory T cells, express the CD27 costimulatory receptor in steady state conditions. There is evidence that CD27 engagement on conventional T lymphocytes favors the development of Th1 and cytotoxic responses in mice and humans, but the impact on the regulatory lineage is unknown.
Methods:
In this report, we examined the effect of constitutive CD27 engagement on both regulatory and conventional CD4+ T cells in vivo, in the absence of intentional antigenic stimulation.
Results:
Our data show that both T cell subsets polarize into type 1 Tconvs or Tregs, characterized by cell activation, cytokine production, response to IFN-γ and CXCR3-dependent migration to inflammatory sites. Transfer experiments suggest that CD27 engagement triggers Treg activation in a cell autonomous fashion.
Conclusion:
We conclude that CD27 may regulate the development of Th1 immunity in peripheral tissues as well as the subsequent switch of the effector response into long-term memory.

Highlights
CD70 overexpression by resting dendritic cells activates both Tconvs and Tregs in vivo
CD27-induced Treg activation is cell autonomous
The transcriptional program induced by CD27 engagement is similar in Tregs and Tconvs
CD27 engagement favors the differentiation of both subsets into CXCR3+ type 1 effectors and the onset of a novel Eomes+ subpopulation
Introduction
The discovery of costimulation in the 1990s has tremendously increased our understanding of immune regulation and opened promising avenues for immune intervention. Several costimulatory molecules from two families have been identified which may display both specific and redundant functions. The immunoglobulin superfamily comprises CD80 and CD86, discovered in 1991, as well as ICOS-L. CD80 and CD86 play a critical role in initial priming and reinforce the TCR-induced signaling pathway, leading to increased activation, IL-2 production and survival. TNF superfamily ligands include CD70, GITRL, 4-1BBL and OX40L. A recent report suggests that TNF-family ligands may be expressed at higher levels on monocyte-derived inflammatory antigen-presenting-cells (APCs), i.e. at a later stage of the response, and may therefore essentially control the post-priming accumulation/function of T lymphocytes (). However, the intrinsic and extrinsic factors that govern the expression of the various costimulatory pathways and their respective roles in the course of immune responses remain unclear.
Among the costimulatory pathways, CD27/CD70 has gained increasing interest in 2008, when it was shown to act as a switch between immunity and tolerance in vivo. CD27 is constitutively expressed in most T cells, including naïve and activated CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, and provides a second signal for T cell activation (–). CD27 signaling is controlled by its unique ligand, CD70, which is transiently expressed upon activation on dendritic cells, B cells and T cells in a tightly regulated fashion (–). Keller et al. generated mice that constitutively express CD70 in conventional dendritic cells and showed that the sole expression of CD70 by immature DCs was sufficient to convert CD8+ T cell tolerance into immunity (). The CD27/CD70 interaction seems to induce bidirectional intracellular signaling, with CD27 interacting with members of the TRAF family, leading to activation of NFκB and MAP kinases, and CD70 inducing PI3K and MEK activation (, ). There is evidence that CD27 engagement may have different outcomes, depending on the strength, duration and timing of the stimulation. The CD27/CD70 interaction has been shown to provide a potent second signal for differentiation of CD4+ T cells into Th1 effectors (, ). CD8+ cells into cytotoxic T lymphocytes (–). By contrast, persistent triggering of CD27 resulted in exhaustion and activation-induced cell death ().
It is intriguing that regulatory T lymphocytes (Tregs) express higher levels of CD27 at steady state, as compared to conventional CD4 T cells (Tconvs), raising the question of the role of this costimulatory pathway in cell subsets displaying opposite functions. Coquet et al. demonstrated that CD27 signaling enhanced positive selection of Tregs (but not Tconvs) within the thymus, resulting in decreased Treg numbers in CD70 or CD70-deficient mice (). Of note, Tregs have been shown to express common master transcription factors with the T helper lineage they control (–). We hypothesized that the CD27/CD70 pathway may regulate the activation/polarisation of both Tconvs and Tregs and more specifically the plasticity (stability versus conversion) of Tregs. To test the impact of CD27 engagement on either subset in vivo, we took advantage of mice that constitutively express (or not) CD70 in conventional DCs and analyzed the functional and molecular features of both populations.
Results
CD70 overexpression in resting DCs induces activation of Tregs and Tconvs
To evaluate the outcome of CD27 engagement on Tconvs and Tregs, a model of supra-optimal CD27 engagement in vivo was devised, by crossing mice carrying a CD70 transgene under the control of the CD11c promoter (CD11c-Cd70tg;CD27-/- mice (, );) with Foxp3eGFP mice (). The heterozygous CD11c-Cd70tg;CD27+/- mice developed a spontaneous pathology starting at about 8-9 wk of age, and died prematurely (from 13 wk of age). A phenotypic analysis of splenic CD4+ T lymphocytes ex vivo from mice of 8 weeks of age revealed an increased proliferation of both Tconvs and Tregs, with a progressive conversion into activated cells expressing Th1-type markers, i.e. Eomes (Eomesodermin), CXCR3 and TIGIT (for T cell immunoglobulin and ITIM domain) (Figures 1A, B). T-bet and RORγt expression was upregulated on a minor population of Tregs, Of note, the proportion of proliferating cells, which increased by 2-fold in all CD4+ T cells, was much higher among Tregs, reaching 41.9%, as compared to T convs (13.3%). The proportion of Eomes+ cells was increased by 4-fold in both subsets, reaching approximately 15.5%, whereas the expression of T-bet was increased in Tregs only (from 2.6 to 7.9%). CXCR3 was expressed by approximately 20% of lymphocytes in either cell subset in CD27+/- control mice, and by 60.7% and 31.3% of Tregs and Tconvs in CD11c-CD70tg;CD27+/- mice, respectively. The expression of ICOS was also strongly increased, reaching about 70% of Tregs. Of note, the proportion of (CD44+ CD62L-) effector Tregs was increased by 2-fold in CD70Tg mice, within a range between 20 and 35% (not depicted), whereas the proportion of Tregs expressing CXCR3 or ICOS reached 60 and 70%, respectively, indicating that the type 1 phenotype was not restricted to the effector Treg subset. The memory phenotype of Tconvs remained unchanged in the same mice. Finally, TIGIT was expressed by a much higher proportion of Tregs in control mice (34.3% versus 5.1% of Tconvs) and reached almost 60% in CD11c-Cd70tg;CD27+/- mice, as compared to less than 20% of Tconvs. The proportion of Tregs among CD4+ T lymphocytes was lower in CD11c-CD70tg;CD27+/- than in control mice, whereas the level of Foxp3 expression remained unchanged (Figure 1B, right panels). The distribution of Tregs remained unchanged in the liver, the mesenteric lymph nodes and the adipose tissue (Supplemental Figure 1A) with a notable drop in Treg frequency in the lamina propria, which correlated with intestinal dysfunction (not depicted). Note that the absolute numbers of CD4+ T lymphocytes were similar in both strains of mice (Supplemental Figure 1B).
Figure 1
A tSNE analysis, based on the same four markers (Eomes, T-bet, CXCR3 and TIGIT), revealed two main changes in the phenotype of CD4+ T lymphocytes in CD11c-Cd70tg;CD27+/- as compared to CD27+/- controls (Figure 1C and Supplemental Figure 2). First, a population of Tregs emerged (9.5% of parent), which expressed high levels of both Eomes and TIGIT, and partly CXCR3 (26,7%) and/or T-bet (5,5%). Second, the expression of CXCR3 and/or TIGIT was also increased in a significant proportion of other cells, whereas T-bet and Eomes were largely restricted to this expanded population. Similarly, a population of Tconvs (31.9% of parent) differentiated upon CD27 engagement, and displayed similar features as activated Tregs, i.e. high levels of Eomes (89.9%) and TIGIT (62.1%), and lower levels of CXCR3 (38,6%) or T-bet (3,9%). The expression of CXCR3, but not TIGIT, was also increased on a separate population of Tconvs in CD70tg mice. As expected (), the CD27 engagement resulted in strongly reduced expression of this receptor on all T lymphocytes (not shown). Thus, the CD27 engagement without intentional TCR stimulation resulted in the expansion of a Eomeshi TIGIThi cell population (representing 10% and 30% of Treg and Tconv, respectively) and increased the expression of CXCR3 on a large, distinct subpopulation in both subsets. TIGIT expression was upregulated on a large proportion of Tregs. Of note, both Tconvs and Tregs from CD11c-Cd70tg;CD27+/- mice also expressed higher levels of co-inhibitory receptors ICOS, CTLA4 and PD-1 (Figures 1A, B).
To prevent an exhaustion potentially due to chronic CD70-mediated stimulation, we triggered CD27 on Tregs in vivo using agonistic anti-CD27 mAbs (, ). The data in Figures 2A, C indicate that Tregs from WT mice injected twice with agonistic anti-CD27 mAbs displayed partly similar phenotype changes as those observed in CD11c-Cd70tg;CD27+/- mice; i.e. increased proliferation of Foxp3+ T cells, and enhanced expression of ICOS, PD-1, CTLA-4, Eomes, but not T-bet, CXCR3 nor TIGIT. Of note, the proportion of Tregs among CD4+ T cells increased as well as the level of Foxp3 expression (Figure 2B). The administration of agonistic mAbs also enhanced the proliferation of Tconvs and increased the expression of ICOS and CXCR3 on a minor population of cells. Finally, this treatment enhanced the expression of IFN-γ by both subsets. Collectively, these data indicate that CD27 may regulate the differentiation/survival of type 1 cells of regulatory and conventional lineages.
Figure 2
The phenotypic changes of Tregs are reminiscent of a few studies showing the development of T-bet-dependent CXCR3+ Treg cells in response to IFN-γ produced by effector cells (, , ). CXCR3+ Tregs have been shown to display unique phenotypic features and nonredundant functional properties to control Th1-related inflammation and autoimmune diseases (, ). We therefore sought to determine (i) the functional status of Tregs in CD11c-CD70tg;CD27+/-; (ii) the transcriptional signature of CD27 engagement in vivo in Tregs versus Tconvs
Transgenic expression of CD70 on DCs induces the activation of type 1- Tconvs and Tregs
We next examined the capacity of both CD4+ T cell subsets to express IFN-γ and IL-10. Ex vivo intracellular FACS staining revealed that a range of 0-40% (median: 11,1%) of Tconvs from CD11c-Cd70tg;CD27+/- mice expressed IFN-γ in response to calcium ionophore and PMA, as compared to less than 7% (median: 6.25) from CD27+/- mice (Figure 3A). The proportion of Tregs expressing IFN-γ ex vivo was also increased in mice constitutively expressing CD70, reaching about 7.45%, as compared to 2% in control mice. Both subsets displayed an increased expression of IL-10, from 2.75 to 8.5% for Tregs and 0.5 to 1.6 for Tconvs. Thus, CD27 engagement in vivo resulted in increased expression of IFN-γ and IL-10 in both subsets, with Tconvs and Tregs as the major IFN-γ and IL-10 producers among CD4+ cells, respectively. The analysis of IFN-γ and IL-10 expression with the selected combination of markers (tSNE Figure 3B) indicated that the majority of the IFN-γ and IL-10 producers were located in the expanded EomeshiTIGIThi populations (as defined in Figure 1C). Thus, this subpopulation of Tregs included 36% IFN-γ+ and 35% IL-10+ cells, whereas the equivalent subset of Tconvs comprised 11,2% IFN-γ+ and 3.4% IL-10+ cells (Supplemental Figure 3; note that the expression of some markers was altered by the permeabilization step and PMA/calcium ionophore activation).
Figure 3
The increased expression of IFN-γ and IL-10 by CD4+ T lymphocytes raised the question of their functionality. To evaluate the function of Tregs, we co-cultured Tconvs from WT mice with increasing numbers of Tregs from CD27+/- or CD11c-Cd70tg;CD27+/- mice in the presence of anti-CD3 and irradiated APCs. The data in Figure 4 suggest that CD27 engagement did not alter the suppressive capacity of Tregs, as assessed by the similar decrease in proliferation of Tconvs co-cultured with Tregs isolated from either strain.
Figure 4
CD27 engagement results in Treg activation in a cell autonomous fashion
An important question is whether the effect of CD27 engagement on Tregs is cell autonomous, or a consequence of pro-inflammatory factors produced by CD70-activated Tconvs. To address this question, we transferred purified Tregs from CD90.1 Foxp3eGFP mice into CD11c-Cd70tg or control mice, i.e. WT (Figure 5A) or CD27-/- (Figure 5B) recipients. Six days after transfer, the proportion (median) of CD90.1+ Tregs expressing KI67 (70.35 versus 22.1%), CXCR3 (45.9 versus 32.15%), T-bet (8.7 versus 0.8%), CTLA-4 (48.9 versus 42.3%), ICOS (56.7 versus 36.5%) and/or PD-1 (44 versus 31.1%) was increased in CD11c-Cd70tg;CD27-/-, as compared to WT hosts (Figure 5A). Note that the proportion of donor Tregs and their relative Foxp3 expression were much higher when transferred in recipients expressing a CD70 transgene. The CD27 expression was abrogated on transferred Tregs, a likely consequence of its engagement by its natural ligand expressed by most DCs (Figure 5 right panels), as previously demonstrated (). To confirm these observations, we transferred Tregs into CD27-/- hosts (which display impaired Treg differentiation) expressing or not CD70tg and found similar in vivo cell expansion/survival and phenotypic changes, resulting in a 10-fold increase in the number of transferred Tregs when CD70tg was present (Figure 5B). CD27 engagement was required, as adoptive transfer of CD27-deficient Tregs into CD70tg hosts resulted in lower expression of “type 1 markers” and lower numbers of donor Tregs detected in the host, as compared to CD27-sufficient donor Tregs (Figure 5C). These observations indicate that CD27 engagement on Tregs was sufficient to induce their proliferation and differentiation into effectors, demonstrating an intrinsic effect.
Figure 5
Finally, to compare the effect of CD27 engagement on Tconvs versus Tregs, we transferred purified CD4+ T lymphocytes from CD90.1 Foxp3eGFP mice into CD11c-Cd70tg, CD27-/- or WT recipients. A phenotypic analysis performed 7 days after transfer (Supplemental Figure 4) showed a more than 2-fold increase in the proportion of Tregs among transferred cells (panel A), which correlated with higher proliferation of Tregs as compared to Tconvs (panel B). The expression of Foxp3 was increased on cells transferred into a CD70Tg host, as compared to WT host (panel A). Of note, the proliferation and CXCR3 expression of transferred, but not host, cells were increased, strongly suggesting that the altered phenotype was driven by CD27-CD70 interactions.
Common transcriptional signature of CD27 engagement in Tregs versus Tconvs
We next performed global transcriptional profiling on sorted Tregs and Tconvs (Supplemental Figure 5) from CD27+/- mice expressing or not the CD70 transgene (Supplemental File 2). 471/92 and 280/92 genes were significantly up/downregulated in Tconvs and Tregs, respectively (at a Log2 fold change>1, min 60 CPM reads per gene, FdR value <0.05)(see volcano plot in Supplemental Figure 6). As expected, Tregs and Tconvs were clearly distinct in principal components analysis. Cells from CD11c-Cd70tg;CD27+/- mice appeared to cluster separately from their CD27+/- counterparts (Figure 6A). Among the differentially expressed genes, we defined 6 gene clusters based on their behaviors in both comparisons (Figure 6B). Among the 758 genes upregulated upon CD27 engagement in either Tconvs or Tregs, cluster 1 genes were significantly upregulated in Tregs only and encode some components of inflammation (Stat1, S100a8/9); cluster 2 includes transcripts enhanced in both Tregs and Tconvs and encodes molecules specific for inflammatory/cytotoxic responses (Ifng, Nkg7, Prf1, Gzma/b, Cxcr3, Tbx21, …); cluster 3 genes were preferentially upregulated in Tconvs (with a tendency in Tregs), reaching similar expression levels in both subsets, and are involved in immune regulation (Zeb2, Prdm1; Tigit, Cebpb). Of note, 45% of transcripts upregulated in Tregs upon CD27 engagement were similarly enriched in Tconvs. As expected (), genes downregulated upon CD27 engagement included genes of the IL-17 pathway: Il17rb (in Tconvs) and Il6ra (in Tregs).
Figure 6
A gene ontology analysis (Figure 6B, right panel) revealed a specific enrichment of common genes involved in T cell activation and migration, production of cytokines and cytokine-mediated signaling pathway in both Tconvs and Tregs (cluster 2). The cluster 1 includes pathways upregulated mainly in Tregs, related to inflammation, cell adhesion and extracellular matrix organization, whereas the cluster 3 comprises pathways upregulated essentially in Tconvs (response to IFN-γ, regulation of cell cycle transition and T cell activation).
The overlay of the CD27-dependent Tconv signature on the comparison of CD11c-Cd70tg;CD27+/- versus CD27+/- Treg signature revealed a strong similarity between transcriptional changes in both subsets (GSEA in Figure 6C). These data indicate that the transcriptional program induced by CD27 engagement is similar in Tregs and Tconvs and is reminiscent of the Th1-type signature.
Eomes overexpression and CXCR3 expression partially recapitulate CD27-induced transcriptional program in Tregs
In order to assess the role of Eomes under steady-state conditions independently of TCR signaling, we used a transgenic mouse line that overexpresses this transcription factor in developing thymocytes under the control of the human CD2 (hCD2) regulatory elements (promoter and Locis Control Region) (). We sorted splenic CD4+ Tregs from these mice and from WT controls and analyzed their transcriptome (Supplemental File 2). Eomes-induced and repressed genes were very highly enriched in Tregs from CD11c-Cd70tg;CD27+/- mice, supporting the notion that this transcription factor is sufficient to drive a similar program (Figure 7A). A flow cytometry analysis confirmed the type 1 phenotype of Tregs from EomesTg, as assessed by increased expression of Tbet, CXCR3, TIGIT and PD-1, as compared to cells from WT mice (Supplemental Figure 7).
Figure 7
We next compared the signature of Tregs from CD11c-Cd70tg;CD27+/- mice with CXCR3+ Tregs () and found strong similarities with CD27-induced changes (Figure 7B). Pathway analysis of signature genes from CD11c-Cd70tg;CD27+/-, EomesTg and CXCR3+ Tregs from WT mice revealed a strong convergence among the 3 subsets (Figure 7C). Common enriched pathways are involved in T cell activation, response to IFN-γ, regulation of leukocyte differentiation, positive regulation of cytokine production and leukocyte migration. In addition to these common signatures, the leukocyte mediated cytotoxicity pathway was enriched only in Tregs from CD11c-Cd70tg;CD27+/- and EomesTg.
Finally, we performed one experiment to evaluate the role for the CD27/Eomes axis in driving the activation of the Treg subpopulation. We injected anti-CD27 mAbs into Eomes sufficient or deficient mice. The data in Supplemental Figure 8, although preliminary, indicate that Eomes was dispensable for the induction of ICOS and PD-1 expression on Tregs and Tconvs in response to CD27 agonism, suggesting a functional redundancy, presumably with the related transcription factor T-bet. Additional experiments using single and double KO mice will be required to better define the respective role of these T-box transcription factors.
Discussion
The main finding of this work is that constitutive CD27 engagement in vivo, in the absence of intentional TCR engagement, results in a gradual process of differentiation into type 1-Tconvs and Tregs. These data complete a previous report showing that transgenic expression of CD70 by dendritic cells is sufficient to induce spontaneous conversion of conventional T lymphocytes into effector cells () and indicate that Tregs undergo a similar process of differentiation into type 1 cells.
Our data reveal a dual effect of CD27 engagement on Tconvs and Tregs: (i) an increase in proliferation/survival and (ii) phenotypic and functional changes with the selective expansion of a population of Eomeshi TIGIThi cells (30% of Tconvs and 10% of Tregs) that display the capacity to produce IFN-γ and/or IL-10 and the increased expression of the chemokine receptor CXCR3 on a large, separate subset (30% of Tconvs and 60% of Tregs). In the absence of deliberate antigenic stimulation, it is likely that TCR signals are provided by environmental and/or auto-antigens (, ).
Effect of CD27 engagement on Tregs
The observation that highly purified CD27+ Tregs become activated (as assessed by proliferation of 60-70% of cells and increased expression of Tbet, CXCR3, ICOS, PD-1) upon transfer into CD70 transgenic hosts (Figure 5) suggests that CD27 signals autonomously on Tregs and does not solely rely on IFN-γ produced by surrounding Tconvs as previously suggested (). Although a potential role of IFN-γ secreted by Tregs themselves cannot be excluded, as a significant proportion of Tregs from CD11c-Cd70tg;CD27+/- mice have the capacity to express IFN-γ, our observations are consistent with a cell autonomous role of CD27 engagement on Treg differentiation. Our data further show that transient CD27 engagement induced a selective expansion of Tregs and likely increased the stability of Tregs, as assessed by higher levels of Foxp3 expression (Figures 2 and 5A; Supplemental Figure 4A), suggesting that CD27 costimulation may have a stronger impact on Tregs than on Tconvs. Finally, the lack of activation/expansion of (CD27-deficient) host T cells upon transfer of CD27-competent CD4+ T cells into CD11c-Cd70tg;CD27-/- mice (Supplemental Figure 4B) further highlights the role of CD27 engagement, as opposed to systemic inflammation, in the activation CD4+ T lymphocytes.
Of note, our data show that the CD27 engagement profoundly impacts the phenotype of Tregs and induces similar transcriptomic changes as in Tconvs (see later discussion). Several reports have highlighted the role of CXCR3 in the recruitment of Tregs to local inflammatory sites. CXCR3+ type-1 Tregs have been shown to play a critical and non-redundant role in the control of Th1-type (auto)-immunity. T-bet- dependent CXCR3+ Tregs accumulated within the pancreatic islets (but not the spleen) in the NOD mouse model of type 1 diabetes, at a frequency that correlated inversely with the size of the inflammatory infiltrate (). Mice that lack CXCR3 in Tregs specifically displayed an aggravated course of the experimental nephritis, that correlated with reduced Treg recruitment to the kidney and an overwhelming Th1 immune response (). Elegant studies by Levine and Rudensky () indicated that elimination of T-bet expressing Tregs resulted in severe autoimmunity and suggested that T-bet regulated their stability and their spatial positioning with T-bet+ effector cells. Littringer et al. further showed that, during Th1 immune responses in mouse and human, Tregs that expressed a set of Th1-specific co-inhibitory receptors and cytotoxic molecules arose (). The relevance of CD27 engagement on Tregs in vivo in more physiological conditions remains to be determined, but is suggested by a recent study demonstrating, that CD27 expression on Tregs was necessary to maintain tolerance and to suppress immune responses to tumours ().
It is interesting that, in addition to their well-known anti-inflammatory function, Tregs may support the development of memory T cells, in particular via IL-10 or CTLA-4 (–). A recent report () shows that type 1-Tregs, expressing CXCR3, home in close proximity to CD8+ T and promote the generation of tissue-resident memory cells in multiple tissues, providing life-long immunosurveillance. Therefore, it is tempting to speculate that CD27 engagement may trigger the differentiation of type-1 Tregs involved in the transition of activated effector cells into quiescent memory cells in peripheral tissues.
Furthermore, our data indicate that chronic CD27 engagement triggers the emergence of a Eomes+ TIGIT+ Treg population that proliferated and included most of IFN-γ and IL-10 producers. TIGIT is an inhibitory receptor expressed on Tregs as well as activated and memory T cells. TIGIT has been shown to increase the stability and the immune suppressive role of Tregs (, ). T-bet was expressed in only 5.5% of this population, suggesting a major role of the transcription factor Eomes, a paralogue of T-bet, in inducing IFN-γ expression. Although Eomes expression was shown to limit Foxp3 induction, and thereby the suppressive function of Tregs (), our data show that chronic CD27 engagement in CD11c-Cd70tg;CD27+/- mice did not alter the expression of Foxp3 (Figure 1B) nor their suppressive capacity, whereas transient engagement enhanced its expression (Figures 2B, 5A and Supplemental Figure 4A). The function of Eomes+ TIGIT+ Tregs remains to be determined but could be related to an increased cytotoxic mechanisms of suppression in vivo, as Eomes expression has been associated with enhanced cytotoxicity (). Data in the literature show that Tregs, although dedicated to the inhibition of inflammatory responses, may produce IFN-γ. Although the consequence of this production is not entirely clear, a few reports indicate that Treg cell intrinsic IFN-γ production was required for their immunosuppressive function (–).
Effect of CD27 engagement on Tconvs
The effect of CD27/CD70 interaction on the function of Tconvs is in agreement with previous studies, showing a preferential differentiation toward the Th1/cytotoxic lineages, as assessed by the expression of cytokines, transcription factors, chemokines and chemokine receptors involved in type 1 inflammation (, , , –). Of note, our data further show that a population of Eomes+ TIGIT+ Tconvs expands, representing 30% of Tconvs, and produces IFN-γ, and some IL-10. Our data are in accordance with a previous report showing that TIGIT+ CD4+ T cells exhibited defects in effector function, i.e. were poor producers of IL-2 and TNF-α, but produced high levels of IFN-γ (). The role of the inhibitory receptor TIGIT remains undetermined but could be related to the exhaustion of CD4+ T cells chronically activated via CD27. Eomes was strongly upregulated in CD4+ Tconvs of CD11c-Cd70tg;CD27+/- mice (3,2 log2 FC). This transcription factor, a paralogue of T-bet, appears to complement T-bet in triggering IFN-γ in T lymphocytes () and was involved in the differentiation of cytotoxic CD4+ T cells. Curran et al. () have shown that the activation of TNFR family receptors, in particular 4-1BB and to a lesser extent CD27, upregulated Eomes on CD4+ T lymphocytes. Eomes+ KLRG1+ CD4 T cells displayed cytotoxic properties and expressed Granzyme B. Similarly, Tconvs in CD11c-Cd70tg;CD27+/- mice expressed granzyme B, natural killer cell granule protein 7 (NKG7), a regulator of granule exocytosis and a promoter of IFN-γ production in Th1 cells (). There is some evidence that these killer CD4+ T cells may control the development of virus associated malignancies, an observation in line with the increased susceptibility of EBV-proliferative diseases in CD27-deficient patients (, ). Accordingly, CD70 has been shown to play a dominant role in both CD4 and CD8 EBV-mediated CTL generation ().
Pathophysiology of deregulated CD70 expression
The overt inflammation in CD11c-Cd70tg;CD27+/- is reminiscent of similar data by Borst and colleagues who reported that mice with transgenic expression of CD70 on dendritic cells or B cells displayed a progressive pathology, i.e. a shift of Tconvs to an effector phenotype in absence of deliberate immunization and ultimately a lethal combined T and B cell immunodeficiency (, , ). These observations are intriguing, as a series of findings concur with a role for CD27 in increasing the regulatory function of Tregs. Indeed, we and others have shown that CD27 co-stimulation increases the proliferation/stability (as assessed by enhanced Foxp3 expression) of Tregs (). In agreement with this concept, CD27 engagement led to an increased expression of inhibitory receptors that should in principle favor their suppressive capacity, accompanied by a moderate (1,5 fold) upregulation of IRF8, a transcription factor known to act as a “stabilisator” for Th1-suppressing Tregs (). It is therefore presently unclear whether Tregs from CD11c-CD70tg;CD27+/- contribute to the overall pathology (via the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IFN-γ) or fail to adequately control the activity of CD27-activated Tconvs in these mice. Altered expression of chemokine receptors affecting the tissue sublocalisation of Tregs and/or a partial resistance of Tconvs to Tregs conferred by CD27 engagement represent possible explanations for the overt inflammation observed in CD11c-Cd70tg;CD27+/- mice. Additional experiments will be required to better characterize the capacity of Tregs to prevent inflammatory reactions in vivo following chronic and acute CD27 stimulation.
Importance of the CD27/CD70 pathway in Tregs
Costimulatory signals play an important role in Treg development and function. However, while CD28 appears to be required for both development () and expression of effector function in Tregs (). CD27 engagement appears to promote the expansion, survival, stability and migration of Tregs into inflammatory sites, with little to no effect on intrinsic Treg suppressive capacity (see () for a review and our own observations indicating a lack of autoimmune disorder in mice selectively lacking CD27 expression in Tregs (data not shown)). The precise identification of the CD70-expressing cell population delivering these survival signals remains to be firmly established, since CD70 can be expressed by a wide variety of immune cells including APCs and activated T and B lymphocytes. The present data (using a transgenic mouse strain in which CD70 is selectively overexpressed by CD11c-positive cells) strongly suggest that dendritic cells, known to be a preferred target of Treg-mediated regulation (, ), represent an important source of CD27 signaling (). Importantly, the sole expression of CD70 by immature DCs was shown to regulate immunity versus tolerance, highlighting the critical role of CD27-CD70 interactions at the interface between T cell and DC Our observations are in line with previous reports showing that the CD27/CD70 pathway triggers Treg development in thymic niches by rescuing differentiating cells from apoptosis (), induces Treg accumulation in solid tumors in mice () and supports the generation of Tregs involved in the control of type 1 diabetes in NOD mice (). However, these results differ from a previous report by Jannie Borst’s group showing that CD27 agonism did not induce Treg expansion () in a murine model of therapeutic vaccination to tumor. Most studies, including ours, found no difference in the in vitro suppressive function of Tregs from CD70-intact and deficient mice () or upon CD27 triggering ().
In addition to this intrinsic effect on Tregs, we have shown previously that CD27+ Tregs have the capacity to inhibit the expression of CD70 on DCs, a mechanism reminiscent of the trans-endocytosis reported for CTLA-4/CD80-CD86, thereby restricting the availability of costimulatory signals in the local environment ().
The respective roles of both costimulatory pathways on Tregs remain elusive. Some similarity includes their non redundant role in thymic development and homeostasis in the periphery. Of note, there seems to be a consensus in the literature indicating a predominant role of CD27 signaling in Treg development and survival over function, in agreement with our own observations.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the data shown herein demonstrate that CD27 engagement favors the differentiation of CXCR3+ type 1-Tconvs and Tregs. Global transcriptional profiling of Tregs from Eomes Tg and CD11c-Cd70tg;CD27+/- mice revealed a strong convergence between them as well as with CXCR3+ Tregs (). However, the transcription factor Eomes appears dispensable for anti-CD27-induced Treg activation, an observation in line with reports suggesting functional redundancy and/or cooperativity between T-bet and Eomes (for review, see (, )). The biological role of these type-1 Tregs in vivo remains to be determined but could be related to a unique, non-redundant function to control inflamed peripheral tissues and to support memory T cell differentiation in peripheral tissues. Thus, the CD27/CD70 pathway may contribute to the onset of inflammation and its resolution, i.e. the transition from effector to memory responses.
Limitations of the study
Our observations suggest that CD27 engagement potentiates the anti-inflammatory capacity of Tregs. However, this statement is based essentially on their phenotype, gene expression and in vitro tests of suppressive activity. Future investigations should include an evaluation of their capacity to control inflammatory responses in vivo in various inflammatory models. Another approach could be based on the use of CD27fl/fl mice (available in our laboratory) to selectively deplete CD27+ Tregs in vivo and assess their role in physiological and pathological immune responses. Finally, data should be interpreted with caution because the constitutive CD27-CD70 interaction affected T cell homeostasis and induced a progressive state of lethal immunodeficiency.
Material and methods
Mice
Wild-type C57Bl/6 mice were purchased from Envigo. CD11c-Cd70tg;CD27-/- and CD27-/- mice were kindly provided by Jannie Borst (NKI, Amsterdam) and crossed to Foxp3eGFP mice from Alexander Rudensky (Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center), kindly provided by Professor Adrian Liston, to generate CD11c-Cd70tg;CD27+/- Foxp3 reporter mice and CD27+/- control mice. hCD2-Eomestg mice were generated as previously described (). The Eomes floxed mice (B6.129S1(Cg)-Eomestm1.1Bflu/J -Strain #:017293) were crossed onto CD4Cre mice, both purchased from The Jackson Laboratory.
Mice were bred and maintained in a temperature-controlled (23 °C) animal care facility with free access to food and water and used at 6 to 8 weeks of age. The experiments were carried out in accordance with the relevant European laws and institutional guidelines. All experiments were performed in compliance with the relevant laws and institutional guidelines from the Animal Care and Use Committee of the Institute for Molecular Biology and Medicine (IBMM, ULB).
Isolation of immune cells and cell sorting
Spleens were dissected from mouse spleen using 70µm cell strainers (Falcon) and further processed under sterile conditions. Single-cell suspensions were rinsed-out with RPMI-1640 (Lonza) supplemented with 10% (vol/vol) fetal calf serum (FCS), 2 mM L-glutamine, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 0.1 mM non-essential amino acids, 40 mM β-mercaptoethanol, 100 U ml−1of penicillin, and 100 U ml−1of streptomycin (all reagents from Lonza).
CD4+ cells were purified by negative selection with magnetic depletion of B cells, macrophages, DCs, NK cells, granulocytes and CD8+ cells using a cocktail of biotinylated antibodies (anti-CD49b, DX5, eBiosciences; anti-GR1, RB6-8C5, produced in house; anti-Ter119, BioXCell; anti-CD11c, N418, produced in house; anti-CD19, BioXCell; anti-CD8β, H35, produced in house; anti-CD25, PC61.5, eBiosciences (used for Tconv-but not Treg- purification); anti-MHCII, M5/114.15.2, eBiosciences). Cells were recuperated after flow-through the magnetic column, with previous incubation with anti-biotin Microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec). Untouched cells were stained to exclude dead cells and incubated with Fc receptor-blocking antibodies CD16/32 (Fc block; BD Pharmingen) and surface staining antibody CD3+ and CD4+. Tconvs and Tregs were identified in FSC/SSC-low-to-moderate and sorted as GFP- or GFP+ respectively using a BD FACSAria III.
Flow cytometry
Single-cell suspensions were stained to exclude dead cells with live/dead fixable violet dead cell stain kit (Life technologies), incubated with Fc receptor-blocking antibodies CD16/32 (Fc block; BD Pharmingen), to block non-specific binding, followed by standard surface staining with fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies listed in Table 1. For intracellular staining, cells were fixed and permeabilized for 25 min with eBioscience™Foxp3/Transcription Factor Staining Buffer Set, Life Technologies) before intranuclear/intracytoplasmic staining.
Table 1
| REAGENT or RESOURCE | SOURCE | IDENTIFIER |
|---|---|---|
| Antibodies | ||
| Agonistic anti-CD27mAb (Rat anti-mouse RM7-3E5) | (Sakanishi &Yagita, 2010) | N/A |
| CD4 Alexa Fluor 700 (Rat anti-mouse RM4-5) | BD Biosciences | Cat #:557956 |
| CD4 Pacific Blue (Rat anti-mouse(RM4-5) | BD Biosciences | Cat #: 558107 |
| CD27 Pe-Cyanine7 (Rat anti-mouse LG7F9) | Thermo Fisher | Cat #: 25-0271-82 |
| CD70 PerCP-eFluor710 (Rat anti-mouse FR70) | Thermo Fisher | Cat #:46-0701-82 |
| CD90.1 PerCP-Cyanin5.5 (Mouse anti-mouse OX-7) | Biolegend | Cat #: 202516 |
| CD152 APC (Rat anti-mouse UC10-489) | Thermo Fisher | Cat #: 17-1522-8 |
| CD183 APC (Hamster anti-mouse CXCR3-183) | BD Biosciences | Cat #: 562266 |
| CD278 PE (Armenian Hamster anti-mouse C398.4A) | BD Biosciences | Cat #: 565669 |
| CD279 APC (Hamster anti-mouse J43) | BD Biosciences | Cat #: 562671 |
| EOMES PE (Rat anti-mouse Dan11mag) | Thermo Fisher | Cat #: 12-4875-82 |
| FOXP3 APC (Rat anti-mouse FJK-16s) | Thermo Fisher | Cat #: 17-5773-82 |
| FOXP3 FITC (anti-mouse/rat FJK-16s) | Thermo Fisher | Cat #: 11-5773-82 |
| IgG Purified Immunoglobulin | Sigma Aldrich | Cat#: I-8015 |
| IL10 BV421 (Rat anti-mouse JES5-16E3) | BD Biosciences | Cat #: 566295 |
| IL10 PE (Rat anti-mouse JES5-16E3) | BD Biosciences | Cat #: 554467 |
| IFNγ APC (Rat anti-mouse XMG1.2) | BD Biosciences | Cat #: 554413 |
| IFNγ BrillantViolet605 (Rat anti-mouse XMG1.2) | Biolegend | Cat #: 505839 |
| Ki67 Alexa Fluor 700 (Rat anti-mouse B56) | BD Biosciences | Cat #: 561277 |
| Tbet Pe (mouse anti-mouse/human eBio4B10) | Thermo Fisher | Cat #: 12-5825-82 |
| TCRβ Chain PerCP-Cyanine 5.5 (Hamster anti-mouse) H57-597 | BD Biosciences | Cat #: 560657 |
| TIGIT PerCP-eFluor710 (Rat anti-mouse GIGD7) | Thermo Fisher | Cat #: 46-9501-80 |
| Chemicals, Peptides, and Recombinant Proteins | ||
| Live/dead stain | Thermo Fisher | Cat#: L34976 |
| PMA | Sigma Aldritch | Cat#: P8139 |
| Ionomycin | Sigma Aldritch | Cat#: I0634 |
| Brefeldin A | Thermo Fisher | Cat#: 00-4506-51 |
| Critical Commercial Assays | ||
| eBioscience Fixation/Perm diluent | Thermo Fisher | Cat#:00-05223-56 |
| eBioscience Fixation/Permeabilization concentrate | Thermo Fisher | Cat#: 00-5213-43 |
| Permeabilization Buffer 10x | Thermo Fisher | Cat#: 00-8333-56 |
| BD Perm/Wash | BD Biosciences | Cat#: 51-2091KZ |
| BD CytoFix/cytoperm | BD Biosciences | Cat#: 51-2090KZ |
| Experimental Models: Organisms/Strains | ||
| Mouse: CD11c-Cd70tg;CD27-/- | () | N/A |
| Mouse: CD27-/- | () | N/A |
| Mouse: C57BL/6JOlaHsd | Envigo | Stock#: 5704F |
| Mouse: Foxp3eGFP | () | |
| Software and Algorithms | ||
| FlowJo software version 9.6.4 | Tree Star | N/A |
| GraphPad Prism 6 | GraphPad software | N/A |
| Other | ||
| BD FACS Aria III | BD Biosciences | N/A |
| BD Canto II | BD Biosciences | N/A |
List of reagents and resources.
Intracellular cytokine detection
For intracellular staining of IFN-γ and IL-10, cells were restimulated in triplicates in 96-well tissue culture plate for 4 h at 37°C, 5% CO2 with 50ng/ml phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) (Sigma) and 1μg/ml ionomycin in the presence of 3μg/ml of an inhibitor of intracellular protein transport BrefeldinA (eBioscience) prior to staining. After 4h, cells were stained for dead cells and surface markers as described previously and then fixed (PFA 2%) during 30min and permeabilized and intracellular stained in Triton 0.1% (diluted on BSA 0.5%). Cells were incubated with directly-conjugated cytokine-specific antibodies diluted in the corresponding permeabilization buffer for 30min and were washed in PBS before FACS analysis.
In vivo treatment
Agonistic anti-CD27 mAb treatment: mice were injected i.p. with 100 or 200µg of agonistic anti-CD27 mAb (BioXCell BE0348), at days 0 and 3, or isotype control (BioXCell BE0089). Spleen cells were analyzed ex vivo by flow cytometry at day 6.
Treg cell transfer
CD4+ Treg cell were enriched from the splenocyte suspension using magnetic microbeads-based CD4+ T cell isolation kit (MiltenyiBiotec) and MACS LS Columns (MiltenyiBiotec) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Following separation, CD4+ T cells were stained with anti-CD4 Pacific Blue (BD Pharmingen). 5 x 105 Tregs sorted as CD4+ FOXP3+ from FOXP3GFP CD90.1 mice were injected i.v. into CD11c-CD70tg;CD27-/-, WT or CD27-/- (C57BL/6) recipients. Spleen cells were analyzed by flow cytometry 7 days later.
CFSE-proliferation suppression assay
Fresh splenic conventional T cells were sorted as CD4+CD25− from C57BL/6 mice. Tregs were sorted from Foxp3eGFP as CD4+CD90.1+GFP+. For carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester (CFSE) labelling, purified CD4+ T cells were resuspended in 10μg/ml of CFSE (Molecular Probes) for 107 cells for 10min at 37°C in dark in RPMI-1640 0% FBS and were washed in cold RPMI-FCS 10% to neutralize CFSE action. 4×104 CFSE-labeled CD4+CD25− GFP- T cells were incubated with 105 irradiated splenocytes (2000 rad) with or without addition of Treg cells at the indicated ratios, and stimulated with 0.5μg/ml soluble anti-CD3 (2C11) for 72 h. Dividing cells were identified by CFSE dilution on FACS analysis.
RNA purification and RNA sequencing
We extracted RNA from 2x105 sorted CD4+ Foxp3- or CD4+ Foxp3+ populations in CD11c-Cd70tg;CD27+/- Foxp3 reporter mice and CD27+/- mice (in duplicates), and RNA from 2x105 sorted CD4+ CD25+ in hCD2-Eomestg mice and wild-type C57Bl/6 mice (in triplicate) using RNeasy Plus Mini kit according to manufacturer’sinstructions (Qiagen), and sample quality was tested on a 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent).
Libraries were prepared using Ovation SoLo RNA-Seq System (NuGEN Technologies) and underwent paired-end sequencing (25 × 106 paired-end reads/sample, NovaSeq 6000 platform) performed by BRIGHTcore ULB-VUB, Belgium (http://www.brightcore.be). Adapters were removed with Trimmomatic-0.36. Reads were mapped to the reference genome mm10 using STAR_2.5.3 software with default parameters and sorted according to chromosome positions and indexed the resulting BAM files. Read counts were obtained using HTSeq-0.9.1. Genes with no raw read count, less than or equal to 10 in at least 1 sample were filtered out with an R script. Raw read counts were normalized, and a differential expression analysis was performed with DESeq2 by applying an adjusted P < 0.05 and an absolute log2 ratio larger than 1.
Data availability
RNA-Seq data that support the findings reported in this study have been deposited in the GEO Repository with the accession code no. GSE214395.
Gene ontology analysis
We introduced gene lists resulting from differential analysis between different groups to clusterProfiler v3.16 R package (). We used the comparison function to compare gene lists and determined any kind of gene-ontology association.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses were performed using Prism6 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA) and R (version 4.2.0). Unpaired t-test was used to determine statistical differences followed by FDR correction for multiple comparisons
Flow cytometry t-SNE plots of Figures 1B, 3B show a pool of 8 mice. Other data are shown as boxplot displaying the distribution of data (the minimum, first quartile, median, third quartile, and maximum). In Figures 1A, 2, 3A, 4, 5, ‘‘n’’ indicates the number of mice per group. For each figure, the number of experiments performed is indicated. A p-value ≤ 0.05 was considered significant and is denoted in figures as follows: ∗, p < 0.05; ∗∗, p < 0.01; ∗∗∗, p < 0.001. No animal or sample was excluded from the analysis.
Statements
Data availability statement
RNA-Seq data that support the findings reported in this study have been deposited in the GEO Repository with the accession code no. GSE214395.
Ethics statement
The animal study was reviewed and approved by Animal Care and Use Committee of the Institute for Molecular Biology and Medicine (IBMM, ULB).
Author contributions
NB-A, VA, AA, GO, OL, SG and MM designed the study and analyzed the data. NB-A and VA performed most experiments with the help of AA. HY provided reagents. OL, SG, GO and MM supervised the study. MM wrote the manuscript with the help of OL, SG and GO. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
The work was supported was the National Fund for Scientific Research (FNRS), the European Regional Development Fund (ERDFWallonia BioMed 2014-2020-LIV 45-20), Wallonia (Programme d’Excellence Food4GUT) and grants from the Fonds Jean Brachet and the Fonds Hoguet.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to Jannie Borst for providing CD70/CD27 transgenic mice and for interesting discussion. We thank M. Dhainaut, F. Andris, S. Denanglaire, K. Englebert for valuable help and C. Abdelaziz and V. Dissy for animal care.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1023064/full#supplementary-material
References
1
ChangYHWangKCChuKLClouthierDLTranATTorres PerezMSet al. Dichotomous expression of TNF superfamily ligands on antigen-presenting cells controls post-priming anti-viral CD4+ T cell immunity. Immunity (2017) 47(5):943–958.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2017.10.014
2
HintzenRQLensSMLammersKKuiperHBeckmannMPvan LierRA. Engagement of CD27 with its ligand CD70 provides a second signal for T cell activation. J Immunol (1995) 154(6):2612–23. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.154.6.2612
3
HendriksJXiaoYBorstJ. CD27 promotes survival of activated T cells and complements CD28 in generation and establishment of the effector T cell pool. J Exp Med (2003) 198(9):1369–80. doi: 10.1084/jem.20030916
4
YamadaASalamaADShoMNajafianNItoTFormanJPet al. CD70 signaling is critical for CD28-independent CD8 + T cell-mediated alloimmune responses In vivo. J Immunol (2005) 174(3):1357–64. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.174.3.1357
5
TesselaarKGravesteinLAVan SchijndelGMWBorstJVan LierRAW. Characterization of murine CD70, the ligand of the TNF receptor family member CD27. J Immunol (1997) 159(10):4959–65. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.159.10.4959
6
TesselaarKXiaoYArensRvan SchijndelGMSchuurhuisDHMebiusREet al. Expression of the murine CD27 ligand CD70 in vitro and in vivo. JImmunol (2003) 170(1):33–40. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.170.1.33
7
ArensRNolteMATesselaarKHeemskerkBReedquistKAvan LierRAWet al. Signaling through CD70 regulates b cell activation and IgG production. J Immunol (2004) 173(6):3901–8. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.173.6.3901
8
SanchezPJMcWilliamsJAHaluszczakCYagitaHKedlRM. Combined TLR/CD40 stimulation mediates potent cellular immunity by regulating dendritic cell expression of CD70 in vivo. J Immunol [Internet] (2007) 178(3):1564–72. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.178.3.1564
9
KellerAMSchildknechtAXiaoYvan den BroekMBorstJ. Expression of costimulatory ligand CD70 on steady-state dendritic cells breaks CD8+ T cell tolerance and permits effective immunity. Immunity (2008) 29(6):934–46. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2008.10.009
10
AkibaHNakanoHNishinakaSShindoMKobataTAtsutaMet al. CD27, a member of the tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily, activates NF-kappaB and stress-activated protein kinase/c-jun n-terminal kinase via TRAF2, TRAF5, and NF-kappaB-inducing kinase. J Biol Chem (1998) 273(21):13353–8. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.21.13353
11
SoaresHWaechterHGlaichenhausNMougneauEYagitaHMizeninaOet al. A subset of dendritic cells induces CD4+ T cells to produce IFN-gamma by an IL-12-independent but CD70-dependent mechanism in vivo. J Exp Med (2007) 204(5):1095–106. doi: 10.1084/jem.20070176
12
van OosterwijkMFJuwanaHArensRTesselaarKvan OersMHJElderingEet al. CD27-CD70 interactions sensitise naive CD4+ T cells for IL-12-induced Th1 cell development. Int Immunol (2007) 19(6):713–8. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxm033
13
PeperzakVVeraarEAMKellerAMXiaoYBorstJ. The pim kinase pathway contributes to survival signaling in primed CD8+ T cells upon CD27 costimulation. J Immunol (2010) 185(11):6670–8. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1000159
14
Van GisbergenKPJMKlarenbeekPLKragtenNAMUngerP-PANieuwenhuisMBBWensveenFMet al. The costimulatory molecule CD27 maintains clonally diverse CD8 + T cell responses of low antigen affinity to protect against viral variants. Immunity (2011) 35:97–108. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2011.04.020
15
FeauSGarciaZArensRYagitaHBorstJSchoenberger andSP. The CD4 + T-cell help signal is transmitted from APC to CD8 + T- cells via CD27–CD70 interactions. J Immunother. (2012) 35(9):651–60. doi: 10.1038/ncomms1948
16
TarabanVYRowleyTFKerrJPBuchanSL. CD27 costimulation contributes substantially to the expansion of functional memory CD8 + T cells after peptide immunization. Eur J Immunol (2013) 43(12):3314–23. doi: 10.1002/eji.201343579
17
TesselaarKArensRvan SchijndelGMWBaarsPAvan der ValkMABorstJet al. Lethal T cell immunodeficiency induced by chronic costimulation via CD27-CD70 interactions. Nat Immunol (2003) 4(1):49–54. doi: 10.1038/ni869
18
CoquetJMRibotJCBąbałaNMiddendorpSvan der HorstGXiaoYet al. Epithelial and dendritic cells in the thymic medulla promote CD4+Foxp3+ regulatory T cell development via the CD27-CD70 pathway. J Exp Med (2013) 210(4):715–28. doi: 10.1084/jem.20112061
19
KochMATucker-HeardGPerdueNRKillebrewJRUrdahlKBCampbellDJ. The transcription factor T-bet controls regulatory T cell homeostasis and function during type 1 inflammation. Nat Immunol (2009) 10(6):595–602. doi: 10.1038/ni.1731
20
KimBLuHIchiyamaKJinWChangSHDongC. Generation of ROR g t + antigen-specific T regulatory 17 cells from Foxp3 + precursors in autoimmunity. CellReports (2017) 21(1):195–207. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.09.021
21
LevineAGMedozaAHemmersSMoltedoBNiecRESchizasMet al. Stability and function of regulatory T cells expressing the transcription factor T-bet. Nature (2017) 546(7658):421–5. doi: 10.1038/nature22360
22
LittringerKMoresiCRakebrandtNZhouXSchorerMDolowschiakTet al. Common features of regulatory T cell specialization during Th1 responses. Front Immunol (2018) 9(JUN):1–15. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01344
23
BrockerTRiedingerMKarjalainenK. Targeted expression of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II molecules demonstrates that dendritic cells can induce negative but not positive selection of thymocytes in vivo. J Exp Med (1997) 185(3):541–50. doi: 10.1084/jem.185.3.541
24
RubtsovYPNiecRJosefowiczSLiLDarceJBenoistCet al. Stability of the regulatory T cell lineage in vivo. Sci (80- ) (2010) 329(5999):1667–71. doi: 10.1126/science.1191996
25
BurchillMATamburiniBAKedlRM. T Cells compete by cleaving cell surface CD27 and blocking access to CD70 bearing APCs. Eur J Immunol (2015) 45(11):3140–9. doi: 10.1002/eji.201545749
26
SakanishiTYagitaH. Anti-tumor effects of depleting and non-depleting anti-CD27 monoclonal antibodies in immune-competent mice. Biochem Biophys Res Commun (2010) 393(4):829–35. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.02.092
27
AhrendsTBabałaNXiaoYYagitaHVan EenennaamHBorstJ. CD27 agonism plus PD-1 blockade recapitulates CD4+T-cell help in therapeutic anticancer vaccination. Cancer Res (2016) 76(10):2921–31. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-3130
28
Guan TanTMathisDBenoistC. Singular role for T-BET + CXCR3 + regulatory T cells in protection from autoimmune diabetes. PNAS (2016) 113(49):14103–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1616710113
29
KochMAThomasKRPerdueNRSmigielKSSrivastavaSCampbellDJ. T-Bet+ treg cells undergo abortive Th1 cell differentiation due to impaired expression of IL-12 receptor β2. Immunity (2012) 37(3):501–10. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2012.05.031
30
CoquetJMMiddendorpSvan der HorstGKindJVeraarEAMXiaoYet al. The CD27 and CD70 costimulatory pathway inhibits effector function of T helper 17 cells and attenuates associated autoimmunity. Immunity (2013) 38(1):53–65. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2012.09.009
31
IstacesNSplittgerberMLima SilvaVNguyenMThomasSLeAet al. EOMES interacts with RUNX3 and BRG1 to promote innate memory cell formation through epigenetic reprogramming. Nat Commun (2019) 10(1):3306. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-11233-6
32
PaustHJRiedelJHKrebsCFTurnerJEBrixSRKrohnSet al. CXCR3+ regulatory T cells control TH1 responses in crescentic GN. J Am Soc Nephrol. (2016) 27(7):1933–42. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2015020203
33
MuthSKlaricARadsakMSchildHProbstHC. CD27 expression on treg cells limits immune responses against tumors. J Mol Med (2022) 100(3):439–49. doi: 10.1007/s00109-021-02116-9
34
PaceLTempezAArnold-SchraufCLemaitreFBoussoPFetlerLet al. Regulatory T cells increase the avidity of primary CD8+ T cell responses and promote memory. Sci (80- ). (2012) 338(6106):532–6. doi: 10.1126/science.1227049
35
KaliaVPennyLAYuzefpolskiyYBaumannFMSarkarS. Quiescence of memory CD8+ T cells is mediated by regulatory T cells through inhibitory receptor CTLA-4. Immunity (2015) 42(6):1116–29. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2015.05.023
36
LaidlawBJCraftJKaechSM. The multifaceted role of CD4+ T cells in the regulation of CD8+ T cell memory maturation. Nat Rev Immunol (2016) 16(2):102–11. doi: 10.1038/nri.2015.10
37
FerreiraCBarrosLBaptistaMBlankenhausBBarrosAFigueiredo-CamposPet al. Type 1 treg cells promote the generation of CD8+ tissue-resident memory T cells. Nat Immunol (2020) 21(7):766–76. doi: 10.1038/s41590-020-0674-9
38
ChenFXuYChenYShanS. TIGIT enhances CD4+ regulatory T-cell response and mediates immune suppression in a murine ovarian cancer model. Cancer Med (2020) 9(10):3584–91. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2976
39
SatoKYamashita-KanemaruYAbeFMurataRNakamura-ShinyaYKanemaruKet al. DNAM-1 regulates Foxp3 expression in regulatory T cells by interfering with TIGIT under inflammatory conditions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U.S.A. (2021) 118(21):e2021309118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2021309118
40
LuparEBrackMGarnierLLaffontSRauchKSSchachtrupKet al. Eomesodermin expression in CD4 + T cells restricts peripheral Foxp3 induction. J Immunol (2015) 195(10):4742–52. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1501159
41
CurranMAGeigerTLMontalvoWKimMReinerSLAl-ShamkhaniAet al. Systemic 4-1BB activation induces a novel T cell phenotype driven by high expression of eomesodermin. J Exp Med (2013) 210(4):743–55. doi: 10.1084/jem.20121190
42
SawitzkiBKingsleyCIOliveiraVKarimMHerberMWoodKJ. IFN-γ production by alloantigen-reactive regulatory T cells is important for their regulatory function in vivo. J Exp Med (2005) 201(12):1925–35. doi: 10.1084/jem.20050419
43
KoeneckeCLeeC-WThammKFöhseLSchafferusMMittrückerH-Wet al. IFN-γ production by allogeneic Foxp3+ regulatory T cells is essential for preventing experimental graft-versus-Host disease. J Immunol (2012) 189(6):2890–6. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1200413
44
DikiySRudenskyAY. Principles of regulatory T cell function. Immunity (2023) 56(2):240–55. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2023.01.004
45
ZhangWAnyalebechiJCRamonellKMChenCWXieJLiangZet al. TIGIT modulates sepsis-induced immune dysregulation in mice with preexisting malignancy. JCI Insight (2021) 6(11):e139823. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.139823
46
PearceELMullenACMartinsGAKrawczykCMHutchinsASZediakVPet al. Control of effector CD8+ T cell function by the transcription factor eomesodermin. Sci (80- ). (2003) 302(5647):1041–3. doi: 10.1126/science.1090148
47
NgSSDe Labastida RiveraFYanJCorvinoDDasIZhangPet al. The NK cell granule protein NKG7 regulates cytotoxic granule exocytosis and inflammation. Nat Immunol (2020) 21(10):1205–18. doi: 10.1038/s41590-020-0758-6
48
AbolhassaniHEdwardsESJIkinciogullariAJingHBorteSBuggertMet al. Combined immunodeficiency and Epstein-Barr virus–induced b cell malignancy in humans with inherited CD70 deficiency. J Exp Med (2017) 214(1):91–106. doi: 10.1084/jem.20160849
49
IzawaKMartinESoudaisCBruneauJBoutboulDRodriguezRet al. Inherited CD70 deficiency in humans reveals a critical role for the CD70-CD27 pathway in immunity to Epstein-Barr virus infection. J Exp Med (2017) 214(1):73–89. doi: 10.1084/jem.20160784
50
ChoiIKWangZKeQHongMQianYZhaoXet al. Signaling by the Epstein–Barr virus LMP1 protein induces potent cytotoxic CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses. Proc Natl Acad Sci United States America. (2018) 115:E686–95. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1713607115
51
ArensRTesselaarKBaarsPAVan SchijndelGMWHendriksJPalsSTet al. Constitutive CD27/CD70 interaction induces expansion of effector-type T cells and results in IFNγ-mediated b cell depletion. Immunity (2001) 15(5):801–12. doi: 10.1016/S1074-7613(01)00236-9
52
WinkelsHMeilerSLievensDEngelDSpitzCBürgerCet al. CD27 co-stimulation increases the abundance of regulatory T cells and reduces atherosclerosis in hyperlipidaemic mice. Eur Heart J (2017) 38(48):3590–9. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx517
53
LeeWKimHSBaekSYLeeGR. Transcription factor IRF8 controls Th1-like regulatory T-cell function. Cell Mol Immunol (2016) 13(6):785–94. doi: 10.1038/cmi.2015.72
54
TangQHenriksenKJBodenEKAaronJYeJSubudhiSKet al. Cutting edge: CD28 controls peripheral homeostasis of CD4 + CD25 + regulatory T cells. J Immunol (2003) 171):3348–52. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.171.7.3348
55
ZhangRHuynhAWhitcherGChangJHMaltzmanJSTurkaLA. An obligate cell-intrinsic function for CD28 in tregs. J Clin Invest. (2013) 123(2):580–93. doi: 10.1172/JCI65013
56
WingJ. Co-Signaling molecules in neurological diseases. Adv Exp Med Biol (2019) 1189:233–65. doi: 10.1007/978-981-32-9717-3_9
57
DhainautMCoquerelleCUzureauSDenoeudJAcoltyVOldenhoveGet al. Thymus-derived regulatory T cells restrain pro- inflammatory Th 1 responses by downregulating CD 70 on dendritic cells. EMBO J (2015) 34(10):1336–48. doi: 10.15252/embj.201490312
58
ClausCRietherCSchürchCMatterMSHilmenyukTOchsenbeinAF. CD27 signaling increases the frequency of regulatory T cells and promotes tumor growth. Cancer Res (2012) 72(14):3664–76. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-2791
59
YeCLowBEWilesMVBruskoTMSerrezeDVDriverJP. CD70 inversely regulates regulatory T cells and invariant NKT cells and modulates type 1 diabetes in NOD mice. J Immunol (2020) 205(7):1763–77. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.2000148
60
PritchardGHKedlRMHunterCA. The evolving role of T-bet in resistance to infection. Nat Rev Immunol (2019) 19(6):398–410. doi: 10.1038/s41577-019-0145-4
61
TakeuchiASaitoT. CD4 CTL, a cytotoxic subset of CD4+ T cells, their differentiation and function. Front Immunol (2017) 8(FEB):1–7. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00194
62
YuGWangLGHanYHeQY. ClusterProfiler: An r package for comparing biological themes among gene clusters. Omi A J Integr Biol (2012) 16(5):284–7. doi: 10.1089/omi.2011.0118
63
FontenotJDRasmussenJPWilliamsLMDooleyJLFarrAGRudenskyAY. Regulatory T cell lineage specification by the forkhead transcription factor Foxp3. Immunity (2005) 22:329–41. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2005.01.016
Summary
Keywords
CD27 costimulation, regulatory T cells, dendritic cells, eomes, CXCR3
Citation
Bowakim-Anta N, Acolty V, Azouz A, Yagita H, Leo O, Goriely S, Oldenhove G and Moser M (2023) Chronic CD27-CD70 costimulation promotes type 1-specific polarization of effector Tregs. Front. Immunol. 14:1023064. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1023064
Received
19 August 2022
Accepted
24 February 2023
Published
13 March 2023
Volume
14 - 2023
Edited by
Karsten Kretschmer, Technical University Dresden, Germany
Reviewed by
Ko Okumura, Juntendo University, Japan; Manfred B. Lutz, Julius Maximilian University of Würzburg, Germany
Updates
Copyright
© 2023 Bowakim-Anta, Acolty, Azouz, Yagita, Leo, Goriely, Oldenhove and Moser.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Muriel Moser, Muriel.Moser@ulb.be
†These authors share first authorship
‡These authors share last authorship
This article was submitted to Immunological Tolerance and Regulation, a section of the journal Frontiers in Immunology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.