Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Immunol., 07 November 2024
Sec. Primary Immunodeficiencies
This article is part of the Research Topic Advancing Research, Clinical Recognition, and Targeted Therapies for WHIM Syndrome View all 4 articles

Heterogeneous phenotype of a Chinese Familial WHIM syndrome with CXCR4V340fs gain-of-function mutation

Yu Huang,,&#x;Yu Huang1,2,3†Lu Li,&#x;Lu Li1,2†Ran Chen,Ran Chen1,2Lang Yu,Lang Yu1,2Shunkai ZhaoShunkai Zhao4Yanjun Jia,Yanjun Jia1,2Ying Dou,,Ying Dou1,2,3Zhiyong Zhang,Zhiyong Zhang1,5Yunfei An,Yunfei An1,5Xuemei Tang,Xuemei Tang1,5Xiaodong Zhao,*Xiaodong Zhao1,5*Lina Zhou*Lina Zhou1*
  • 1National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, Children’s Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
  • 2Chongqing Key Laboratory of Child Rare Diseases in Infection and Immunity, Children’s Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
  • 3Department of Hematology Oncology, Children’s Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
  • 4Department of Biology, School of Arts and Sciences, Tufts University, Medford, MA, United States
  • 5Department of Rheumatism and Immunology, Children’s Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China

Background: WHIM syndrome is a rare, autosomal dominant inborn error of immunity characterized by warts, hypogammaglobulinemia, infection, and myelokathexis. It is caused mainly by heterozygous mutations at the C-terminus of the C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4 (CXCR4) gene.

Methods: We described the detailed clinical, genetic, immunological and treatment characteristic of four WHIM patients from a single Chinese family.

Results: Here, we report four patients from a family carrying a variant of CXCR4 (c.1016_1017dupCT), which introduces a frameshift at codon V340, resulting in an extension of 14 amino acids (p.V340L fs*27). We provide and in-depth analysis of their clinical, genetic, immunological and treatment characteristic, noting that these patients exhibited an atypical clinical phenotype when compared to reported CXCR4R334X patients. Additionally, the frameshift variant CXCR4V340fs led to impaired receptor downregulation in patients’ PBMCs, and in HEK293T cells transfected with the variant plasmids.

Conclusions: Our study provided detailed clinical features of four CXCR4V340fs WHIM patients from one Chinese family who presented atypical phenotype and enrich the spectrum of WHIM syndrome.

Introduction

WHIM syndrome is classified as an inborn error of immunity (IEI) and is characterized by the presence of human papillomavirus (HPV)-related warts, hypogammaglobulinemia, recurrent infections, and myelokathexis. Myelokathexis is defined as peripheral neutropenia resulting from the abnormal retention of mature neutrophils in the bone marrow (13). Nearly all cases of WHIM syndrome are attributed to heterozygous autosomal dominant mutations in the C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4 (CXCR4) gene (4), CXCR4 is widely expressed across various cell types, including mature leukocyte subtypes, epithelial cells, endothelial cells, hematopoietic progenitors, stromal fibroblasts, and cancer cells (5, 6). CXCR4 interacts with its unique natural ligand, CXCL12. The CXCR4/CXCL12 axis is critical for the homing and egress of leukocytes from bone marrow, as well as for directing leukocytes trafficking to the spleen and lymph nodes and facilitating B cell development in the bone marrow (7, 8).

Together with the recently reported international cohort of 66 WHIM patients (9) (the P1-P4 in our study refers to the P37-P40 of the literature), fewer than two hundred cases of WHIM syndrome have been reported overall. Thirty-seven distinct CXCR4 variants have been identified, whice including eight nonsense variants, twenty-seven frameshift variants, and two missense variants. Notably, all variants, except one, are located in the cytoplasmic C-tail of the receptor (912). The most common and well-studied WHIM variant is CXCR4R334X, a nonsense variant that results in the deletion of the C-terminal 19 amino acids of the CXCR4 receptor. This variant leads to enhanced CXCL12-mediated receptor signaling, delayed desensitization, and impaired receptor internalization (13, 14).

In this study we present a Chinese family (designated P1–P4, corresponding to P37-P40 in a large WHIM syndrome cohort) with WHIM syndrome caused by a CXCR4 C-terminal variant. Prior literature, in which we participated, included only brief descriptions of clinical features and CXCR4 internalization assays using constructing cell lines. The clinical phenotype of WHIM syndrome displays significant heterogeneity; only a minority of patients (approximately 20–30%) exhibit all four classic clinical features (9). Furthermore, neutrophil counts may normalize intermittently during infections, creating challenges and delays in diagnosis. Therefore, we present and compare the clinical information, laboratory features and treatment with previous reported hotspot variant patients in detail, finding out our V340L fs27 variant patients presented heterogeneous clinical manifestations and received less treatment. These detailed clinical and laboratory descriptions and comparisons may assist clinicians in better recognizing and diagnosing Whim syndrome, particularly in patients with atypical phenotypes.

Materials and methods

Patients

A total of five patients (including P5) from two families were enrolled. Peripheral blood samples were collected from all patients, their parents, and age-matched healthy controls (HCs). All data (including pictures) provided informed consent. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Children’s Hospital of Chongqing Medical University (2021–138) and was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Genetic analysis

Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood samples and sent to MyGenostics (Beijing, China) for gene sequencing. All CXCR4 variants are based on the reference sequence NM_003467.2. The variants in CXCR4 were confirmed by Sanger sequencing using the following primers: forward, 5’-AGGCCCTAGCTTTCTTCCAC-3’; reverse, 5’- CATACAGCAACTAAGAACTTGGC-3’.

Quantification of TRECs and KRECs

Quantitative real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) for detecting T cell receptor excision circles (TRECs) and kappa-deleting recombination excision circles (KRECs) was performed as described previously (15).

Plasmid construction and transfection

The cDNA sequence encoding CXCR4WT was purchased from Youbao Biotechnology (Changsha, China). Plasmids containing CXCR4V340fs and CXCR4R334X were generated by overlap PCR using CXCR4WT as a template, subcloned into the 7.1-pCMV-3×Flag vector and confirmed by Sanger sequencing. HEK293T cells (2.5×105cells/well) were plated overnight in 24 well plates and transiently transfected with 500 ng of wild-type (WT) or variant plasmids using Polyethylenimine Linear (PEI; APExBIO, USA). All subsequent experiments were performed 24 h later. HEK293T cells were also used as a tool cell-line in previous study as its CXCR4 expression levels were extremely low (20fmol/mg of membrane protein) and easier transfection (7).

Transwell

Transfected HEK293T cells (1×105 cells) were seeded into the upper chambers of Transwell (8 μm pore size; Corning, USA). 10%FBS DMEM medium with 50 nM CXCL12 were added to the bottom chamber. After incubation for 6 h, cells were fixed with 4% formaldehyde at room temperature for 30 min, washed twice with PBS and stained with crystal violet for 20 min. Finally, cells in the upper chamber were wiped off with a cotton swab and photographed.

Flow cytometry analysis

Expression of CXCR4 on the surface of PBMCs from patients and HCs were detected by flow cytometry using the following antibodies (purchased from BioLegend): anti-human FITC-CD3, Pacific Blue-CD4, BV510-CD8, PerCP-Cy5.5-CD19, APC-Cy7-Fixable Viability, PE-CXCR4 (clone: 12G5), and PE-mouse lgG2a κ (isotype control).

For the internalization assay, PBMCs or transfected HEK293T cells were cultured in 24 well plates containing RPMI 1640 or DMEM medium supplemented with 10% FBS, respectively. Cells were incubated in the presence or absence of 10 nM, 50 nM, 100 nM, 200 nM CXCL12 (PeproTech, USA) for 1 h, 2 h and 4 h at 37°C respectively, washed, resuspended, and stained with flow cytometry staining buffer. Expression of CXCR4 on the cell surface were detected by FACS Canto II cytometer, and the data were analyzed by FlowJo V10 software.

For the Phosflow-cytometry studies, PBMCs were stimulated with 50 nM CXCL12 for 0 or 5 min at 37°C. The cells were then fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (Thermo, USA), permeabilized (Invitrogen, USA), and stained with p-AKT S473 (BD Biosciences, USA).

Peripheral blood lymphocyte subsets were assessed using the following antibodies: anti-human CD3, CD4, CD8, TCR αβ, TCR γδ, CD45RA, CD27, CXCR3, CCR6, CXCR5, CD19, CD24, CD38, IgD (all from BioLegend). The gating strategies for the T/B cell subpopulations, and the normal reference range, have been described previously (16).

RT-PCR

RNA were extracted from peripheral blood of patients and HCs using Blood Total RNA miniprep kit (Axygen, USA) and reverse transcribed to cDNA. CXCR4 mRNA levels were determined by Real-time Quantitative PCR (RT-PCR) using TB Green Premix ExTaq II (Takara, Japan). CXCR4 primers were as follows: F: 5’-GGGCAATGGATTGGTCATCCT-3’, R: 5’-TGCAGCCTGTACTTGTCCG-3’.

Human B cell Enzyme−Linked ImmunoSpot assay

Pertussis toxin (PT)-specific IgG and total IgG secreted by memory B cells were detected using a Human IgG ELISpotBASIC kit (BioLegend, USA). Briefly, PBMCs were pre-stimulated with the TLR7/8 agonist R848 (1 μg/mL) and recombinant human IL-2 (10 ng/mL), or with PBS only, for 5 days at 37°C/5% CO2 (17, 18). ELISpot plates were pre-coated overnight at 4°C with PT (0.1 mg/mL) and anti-human IgG (15 μg/mL). Cultured PBMCs were added to the plates at 37°C/5% CO2 overnight, and then removed. Biotinylated anti-IgG monoclonal antibodies, alkaline phosphatase, and BCIP/NBT-plus substrate were added to the wells for 2 h, 1 h, and 10 min, respectively. Finally, the plates were left to dry overnight in the dark prior to analysis by ImmunoSpot.

Statistical analysis

Results are expressed as the mean ± SD. P values were calculated using an unpaired Student’s t-test. All statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 8. P<0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Clinical manifestations of the family with WHIM syndrome

A total of five patients were included in the study (Figure 1A). P1–P4 were members of the same family; notably, the father of P3 and P4 had passed away in his youth due to unknown causes. P5 was a patient from a different family (this case has been published previously (19) and served as a control for hotspot variants). All five patients presented with recurrent respiratory tract infections and neutropenia as their initial or primary symptoms.

Figure 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Pedigrees and clinical manifestations of 5 WHIM patients. (A) Pedigrees of two families with WHIM syndrome. (B) Hematological tests of P1 and P2. The dashed line represents the normal reference range. The red arrows represent respiratory infections. (C) The chest CT images of P1, P2 and P5. The red arrow indicates bronchiectasis of patient. (F) Skin warts on the hands of P4 and P5. The red arrow indicates warts of patients. (D) Bone marrow representative images of myelokathexis of P1 and P5 (1000×). The red arrow indicates myelokathexis. (E) The TRECS and KRECS of P1, P2 and P5 compared with age matched HCs.

P1 is currently 9.4 years old. He suffered from pneumonia at the age of 3 months, accompanied by neutropenia. Since that time, P1 has suffered respiratory infections approximately two to three times per year, primarily presenting with fever and cough, which typically resolve within a week after treatment with oral symptomatic medications or cephalosporin for infections. Between the ages of two and five, he experienced only two or three episodes of otitis media, with no associated hearing loss. Notably, he has never had an HPV infection. Hematological tests indicated a significant reduction in both neutrophils and lymphocytes; however, his neutrophil count transiently returned to normal during respiratory infections (Figure 1B). Immunoglobulin levels for P1 were within the reference range. Chest CT scans conducted at ages 4 years and 6 months and 10 years and 10 months revealed no abnormal findings (Figure 1C). Bone marrow examination demonstrated active granulocyte proliferation, with observed swelling, vacuolation, and toxic granules, consistent with myelokathexis (Figure 1D). Compared to age-matched healthy controls, P1 exhibited decreased TRECs and KRECs (Figure 1E).

P2 is currently 11.5 years old. She began exhibiting symptoms of respiratory tract infection, specifically recurrent fever and cough, at the age of 1 year. Since turning five, she had experienced only two or three episodes of otitis media, with no accompanying hearing loss. Notably, she has never had an HPV infection. When asymptomatic, a chest CT performed on P2 at the age of 10 years and 10 months revealed no abnormalities (Figure 1C). At the age of, P2 was hospitalized due to edema, and subsequent tests showed proteinuria, hyperlipidemia, and hypoproteinemia, leading to a diagnosis of nephrotic syndrome. Following treatment with oral prednisone, her urine protein levels quickly normalized. However, due to irregular follow-up and voluntary reduction of drugs, proteinuria recurred. She was then admitted to our hospital for further treatment. After regular follow-up and dosage adjustments over four years, routine urine examinations have shown no abnormalities. No renal manifestations were found in P1, P3 and P5.Neutropenia was detected when P2 was 4years old, and hematological tests revealed low leukocyte counts, particularly in neutrophils (Figure 1B). Immunoglobulin levels for P2 were within the reference range. Bone marrow tests were not performed for P2. Compared to age-matched healthy controls, both TRECs and KRECs were found to be decreased in P2 (Figure 1E).

P3 is currently 39 years old and has experienced recurrent cough and expectoration since childhood, with a diagnosis of neutropenia confirmed at the age of 24 years. P3 currently exhibits no symptoms of infection or skin warts. Her immunoglobulin levels fall within the reference range. Bone marrow examination in P3 reveals markedly active proliferation, characterized by a high proportion of mature granulocytes, which appear normal in size and morphology. These findings are consistent with myelokathexis.

P4, now 35 years old, has been prone to upper respiratory infections since the age of 2. He experienced otitis media two or three times, although neutropenia was not initially recorded. Subsequent hematological tests indicated leukopenia and neutropenia; however, these levels were not continuously monitored. A warty protuberance was observed on the pulp of P4’s left thumb (Figure 1F). Currently, P4 shows no symptoms of infection. No bone marrow examination or immunoglobulin level assessments have been conducted for P4.

P5 is currently 14 years old. He first experienced recurrent cough, expectoration, and intermittent fever at the age of 3, with neutropenia subsequently detected at 9 years old. He has suffered from recurrent otitis media and has been diagnosed with conductive deafness. A chest CT scan revealed bronchiectasis in the middle lobe of the right lung (Figure 1C). Additionally, multiple large verrucous vegetations were observed on the dorsum of P5’s hands (Figure 1F). His immunoglobulin levels are below the reference range. Bone marrow analysis showed active proliferation of nucleated cells in P5, with an increased granulocyte reserve characterized by a heightened myeloid-to-erythroid ratio and a “shift to the right.” The cells displayed signs of swelling, vacuolation, and the presence of toxic granules. These cytological changes in the bone marrow are indicative of myelokathexis (Figure 1D). Compared to age-matched healthy controls, both TRECs and KRECs were found to be decreased in P5 (Figure 1E). This finding aligns with previous reports of low TREC levels in certain WHIM patients (20, 21). Although all patients experienced recurrent infections, P1 - P4 did not develop bronchiectasis or hearing loss, suggesting that they may have had milder infections than P5; further studies involving more cases are warranted to explore this speculation. Table 1 summarizes and compares the clinical characteristics of the five patients.

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Summary of the clinical and immunologic features of 5 patients.

Given the high heterogeneity observed in the clinical characteristics of WHIM patients, we reviewed the clinical manifestations, laboratory tests, treatments and outcomes of 28 hotspot mutation (R334X) patients and compared these items with the four patients (P1-P4) in our study. Detailed information is presented in Table 2 and Supplementary Table, where positive clinical symptoms, laboratory test results, and treatments and outcomes are highlighted in gray. A comparative analysis reveals that the patients P1 - P4 from family1 only experienced respiratory tract infections and otitis media; notably, no infections involving the skin, gastrointestinal, urinary tract or other systems occurred. Additionally, there were no complications associated with recurrent severe infections, such as bronchiectasis and hearing loss, in patients P3 and P4 patients, in contrast to other mid-aged R334X patients). No congenital abnormalities or autoimmune diseases were found in patients P1-P4; in comparison, approximately 7% of patients with the R334X mutation reported autoimmune diseases, while around 14% exhibited congenital abnormalities. Moreover, no malignancies have been observed in P1-P4 patients to date. Laboratory tests indicated that neutropenia, lymphocytopenia and myelokathexis were found in nearly all patients. In terms of treatment and prognosis, our patients received general antibiotics solely for respiratory infections and did not undergo preventive anti-infective therapy. In contrast, 32% of patients with the hot R334X mutation were administered antibiotic prophylaxis. Furthermore, P1 received intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) treatment approximately 10 times from infancy to age 9, while P2 and P3 underwent IVIG treatment once and twice, respectively. P4 did not receive any IVIG treatment. In summary, the findings suggest that the four patients in our study exhibited relatively mild and heterogeneous clinical manifestations.

Table 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Comparison of P5 with the hotspot mutation R334X with P1-P4.

Identification of a heterozygous extended variant in CXCR4

Immunopanel analysis identified CXCR4 variants in all five patients, which were subsequently confirmed by Sanger sequencing. P1–P4 from family 1 carried a heterozygous variant, c.1016_1017dupCT, in exon 2 of the CXCR4 gene. This variant results in a frameshift, leading to the protein alteration p.V340L fs*27. Following the guidelines established by the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) for interpreting sequence variants, this variant was classified as pathogenic. P5 from family 2 harbored the most common WHIM-associated variant in the CXCR4 gene (c.1000C>T, p.R334X) (Figures 2A, B). Notably, these variant amino acids are situated within the highly conserved cytoplasmic C-terminal domain of the CXCR4 gene (Figures 2C, D). The mutation taster prediction indicated that CXCR4V340fs was “pathogenic”, with a Provean prediction score of -19.586 (Figure 2E). Therefore, the clinical manifestations observed in the patients, combined with bioinformatics analysis, strongly suggest that the CXCR4 (c.1016_1017dupCT, p.V340L fs*27) variant may be pathogenic.

Figure 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Detection of a heterozygous mutation of CXCR4 led to WHIM syndrome. (A) Sanger sequencing of CXCR4 were performed using genomic DNAs from family 1. (B) Sanger sequencing of the CXCR4 gene in P5 and family members. (C) Schematic representation of seven transmembrane G protein coupled receptor CXCR4. Yellow, the variant of family 1. Red, the hotspot CXCR4 variant of WHIM syndrome. (D) The variant and WT amino acid sequences of CXCR4. The C-terminal of CXCR4 is highly conserved phylogenetically. (E) The pathogenicity analysis of the CXCR4V340fs variant.

Decreased surface CXCR4 expression on CD8+T cells and B cells from patients

Given that CXCR4 is widely expressed on leukocytes (22) and previous studies have reported a decreased proportion of CXCR4+ cells along with lower CXCR4 mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) in PBMCs from WHIM patients (5), we investigated whether the CXCR4V340fs heterozygous mutation affects receptor expression in PBMCs. We assessed the surface expression of CXCR4 using flow cytometry. For P1–P4, the MFI of CXCR4 on CD8+T cells and B cells was significantly lower compared to cells from age-matched HCs (Figures 3A, B). We also measured the transcript levels of CXCR4 using RT-PCR. Interestingly, P1-P4 exhibited relatively higher levels of CXCR4 lexpression, particularly in pediatric patients P1 and P2 (Supplementary Figure SA). Concurrently, the percentage of CXCR4+ cells within CD8+T cells significantly decreased, while the percentage of CXCR4+ cells among B cells in adult patients was lower than that in cells from HCs (Figures 3C, D). These findings indicate that the CXCR4V340fs variant reduces the surface expression of CXCR4 on CD8+T cells and B cells. While these changes were a bit less visible in CD4+T and CD3+T cells.

Figure 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. The surface CXCR4 expression were decreased on B cells and CD8+T cells in patients. (A) Mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of CXCR4 on PBMCs from patients and age-matched HCs (n=4). (B) The CXCR4 MFI of lymphocyte subsets in panel (A). (C) CXCR4+ proportion of PBMCs from patients and age-matched HCs (n=4). (D) Statistics of CXCR4+ proportion in panel (C). *P<0.05, **P<0.01 for comparison between patients and HCs.

The CXCR4V340fs variant results in impaired receptor internalization and hyperactive downstream signaling

A defect in CXCL12-mediated receptor internalization is one of the primary hallmarks of WHIM syndrome (3, 23, 24). Given the necessity of C-tail integrity for the internalization of CXCR4, we investigated the impact of the CXCR4V340fs variant on this process. Notably, the cell surface expression of CXCR4 was markedly downregulated in PBMCs from HCs following stimulation with CXCL12. In contrast, receptor downregulation in PBMCs from P1–P4 was significantly diminished in response to CXCL12 (Figure 4A). Similar trends were observed when cells were treated with varying concentrations of CXCL12. Although P1-P4 all shared the same V340L variant and lived in comparable environment, differences in CXCR4 internalization were noted between P1-P2 and P3-P4 when stimulated with high concentrations of CXCL12 (Supplementary Figure SB). To further verify these findings, we constructed plasmids for CXCR4WT, CXCR4V340fs, and CXCR4R334X and transfected them into HEK293T cells. Cells transfected with CXCR4WT plasmid exhibited downregulation of cell surface CXCR4 following stimulation with CXCL12. Conversely, HEK293T cells transfected with the CXCR4V340fs and CXCR4R334X plasmids showed minimal downregulation (Figure 4B), and no significant downregulation was observed even with prolonged stimulation (Supplementary Figure SC). Additionally, enhanced migration is a characteristic feature of immune cells expressing CXCR4WHIM receptors. To assess this, we performed a transwell migration assay using HEK293T cells, revealing that the migration of cells expressing the CXCR4V340L and hotspot CXCR4R334X variants was significantly increased (Supplementary Figure SD).

Figure 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. CXCR4V340fs is a gain-of-function mutation. (A) Surface CXCR4 expression of PBMCs were measured by FACS using CXCR4-specific mAb 12G5 in the presence or absence of 50nM CXCL12 stimuli. Values represent the percentage of CXCR4 downregulation after stimulation. (B) Transiently transfected HEK293T cells were stimulated with vehicle or 50nM CXCL12 for 1h, surface expression of CXCR4 was detected (n=3). The dashed lines represent CXCR4 expression normalized to 100% before stimulation. (C) PBMCs from HC and P3 were stimulated with 50nM CXCL12 for 0 or 5 min, fixed, and analyzed for intracellular MFI of p-AKT (S473) by gating on T cells and B cells. (D) Transiently transfected HEK293T cells were stimulated with 50nM CXCL12 for the indicated times, and the whole-cell lysates were measured by Western blot to determine total ERK1/2, AKT and p-ERK1/2, p-AKT, GAPDH levels. (E) The p-AKT and p-ERK1/2 expression were calculated by band densitometry using ImageJ. Data are shown as mean ± SEM from three independent experiments. *p<0.05, ***p<0.001 for the comparison between CXCR4V340fs and CXCR4WT, #p<0.05 and ###p<0.001 for the comparison between CXCR4R334X and CXCR4WT.

CXCR4 is known to promote the phosphorylation of ERK1/2 and AKT through the Gi and GRK/β-arrestin-dependent pathways (25, 26). Previous studies have indicated that most CXCR4 variants amplify both the amplitude and duration of ERK1/2 and AKT activation in response to CXCL12 stimulation (24). Accordingly, we assessed the expression of p-AKT using flow cytometry and found that the MFI of p-AKT in CD3+T cells and B cells from P3 was significantly higher, both before and after CXCL12 stimulation, compared to that in HCs (Figure 4C). In parallel, we transfected WT CXCR4 and variant plasmids, specifically CXCR4V340fs and CXCR4R334X, into HEK293T cells. The expression levels of p-AKT and p-ERK1/2 following CXCL12 stimulation were found to be stronger and more sustained in cells transfected with the variant plasmids than in those transfected with the CXCR4WT plasmids (Figures 4D, E). Thus, we conclude that CXCR4V340fs represents a gain-of-function mutation that impairs receptor internalization, leading to hyperactive downstream signaling following ligand binding.

Abnormal distribution of lymphocyte subsets in WHIM patients

Additionally, we analyzed blood lymphocyte subsets in all five patients. We noted that the absolute numbers of CD8+T cell subsets, particularly naïve CD8+T cells, were markedly lower than normal levels in all patients. Furthermore, the number of naïve CD4+T cells in P2–P5 was reduced. Consequently, the overall number of T cells was decreased across all patients. Similarly, the counts of B cell subsets in these five patients were significantly lower compared to those in age- and sex-matched controls. In particular, T and B cell subset numbers in P5 were lower than those in P1–P4. The number of NK cells in P2–P4 was also decreased (Table 3).

Table 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Analysis of lymphocyte subsets in the peripheral blood.

We next evaluated the proportion of CD4+T (Th) and T follicular helper (Tfh) subsets in P1–P4. Notably, P3 and P4 showed an increased frequency of Th and Th1/17 cells, while the frequency of Th2 and Th2-like Tfh cells was reduced. In contrast, the proportions of Th and Tfh cell subsets in P1 and P2 were comparable to those observed in HCs (Figures 5A, B).

Figure 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5. Abnormal distributions of lymphocyte subsets and impaired ability to produce PT specific IgG in patients. (A) The percentages of Tfh, Th1-like, Th2-like, Th17-like, Th1/17-like and Th1, Th2, Th17, Th1/17 cells in patients and six age-matched HCs. (B) Statistics of CD4+T and Tfh cell subpopulations in panel (A). (C) Representative images of total IgG and PT specific IgG detected by ELISPOTs in P2 and HC. *P<0.05, ***P<0.001 for comparison between patients and HCs.

Given that none of the patients in family 1 exhibited hypogammaglobulinemia, we performed ELISpot assays to assess lgG secretion by memory B cells. P1 and P2 had been vaccinated according to the Childhood Immunization Schedule for National Immunization Program Vaccines - China. According to this program and P2’s vaccination record, P2 received DTaP vaccination (diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis) at 3, 4, 5 and 18 months of age. Since the DTaP vaccine is provided free of charge and is mandatory for all individuals in our country, and given that pertussis toxin (PT) is one of the immunogens available for purchase, we specifically tested for PT-specific IgG production using the ELISpot assay. Compared to cells from the HC, cells from P2 exhibited a diminished ability to produce PT-specific IgG (Figure 5C). Overall, theses data suggest that the CXCR4V340fs variant adversely affects the immune functions of both T and B cells.

Discussion

WHIM syndrome was first described in 1964 (27); while heterozygous mutations in the chemokine receptor CXCR4 identified as the cause in 2003 (4). The classic clinical manifestation is tetralogy; however, even the hotspot mutation (CXCR4R334X) may present with atypical clinical manifestations, which only presented with myelokathexis (28). Furthermore, patients within the same family who share the same genotype can exhibit varying clinical symptoms (29). Thus, the considerable heterogeneous in the age of diagnosis and clinical manifestations complicate the identification of this syndrome. In this study, we provide a detailed clinical, genetic and immunological characterization of four WHIM patients from two generations of a Chinese family, all of whom harbor an extended mutation caused by a pair of base duplications (c.1016_1017dupCT, p.V340Lfs*27) in CXCR4 gene. Compared to reported patients with the CXCR4R334X mutation, these four individuals with the CXCR4V340fs mutation exhibit atypical phenotypes.

The clinical manifestations of WHIM syndrome are notably heterogeneous (10); indeed, only about one-third of patients meet the diagnostic tetrad criteria for WHIM syndrome. The majority of patients experience non-cyclic neutropenia (98%), followed by lymphopenia (88%) and hypogammaglobulinemia (65%). Recurrent infections occur in 92% of patients, predominantly presenting as otitis media and pneumonia, while approximately 40% of patients develop HPV-related warts on various body parts (9). None of the patients in family 1 exhibited all four features of WHIM syndrome; In contrast, P5 from family 2 presented with warts, hypogammaglobulinemia, recurrent infections, and myelokathexis, along with bronchiectasis and conductive deafness resulting from recurrent infections. Given the differences in clinical manifestations between the patients in Family 1 and P5, we conducted a literature search for patients with similar CXCR4 mutations as those in Family 2 (Supplementary Table S3). As indicated in Table 2, (a) Despite being in their thirties, neither P3 nor P4 has experienced bronchiectasis or hearing loss due to recurrent infections; (b) P4 had one wart on his hand, while no warts were observed in P1, P2, or P3. Conversely, multiple warts were found in all adult and older children with CXCR4R334X mutation. This suggests that HPV infection in our four patients is relatively mild. (c) In terms of treatment, none of our four patients received antibiotic prophylaxis, G-CSF, Regular IgGRT, Plerixafor, HSCT, etc. They are currently in asymptomatic condition and have no severe infections occurred. In summary, as P1 and P3 only presented with one typical symptom (myelokathexis), P4 presented with warts, we can infer that the four WHIM patients we reported presented atypical clinical phenotypes. Notably, P2 also experienced nephrotic syndrome, though no other related renal diseases have been reported in the past, aside from congenital renal anomalies. However, Previous studies have indicated that CXCR4 plays a role in kidney fibrosis through multiple effectors (30). Additionally, CXCR4 has been shown to induce podocyte injury and proteinuria by activating β-catenin signaling (31). Consequently, it remains unclear whether the genetic mutation or WHIM syndrome contributes to renal disease, necessitating further investigation through additional cases and longitudinal follow-up. Research suggests that the heterogeneity of clinical features observed in WHIM patients may be linked to mutant CXCR4-dependent alterations in signaling pathways (29). However, due to the significant clinical heterogeneity of primary immunodeficiency disease and the limited number of WHIM patients, the relationship between the CXCR4V340fs variant and milder clinical phenotypes requires further exploration through larger case studies.

Furthermore, several case reports have documented variants occurring near amino acid 340 of the CXCR4 protein. One notable study described a truncated mutation (S339fsX342) resulting from a c.1016_1017 deletion at the C-terminus, which led to the full tetrad of WHIM syndrome features. This patient additionally experienced persistent enteritis and received treatment with G-CSF, subcutaneous immunoglobulin, and antibiotics. Notably, the clinical manifestations of this WHIM patient with the extended mutation (S341fsX365) were strikingly similar to those of P1–P4, including warts, neutropenia, recurrent respiratory infections, and myelokathexis; however, hypogammaglobulinemia was not observed. Moreover, the patient only received IVIG treatment for 3 years during childhood (32). A recently reported case of WHIM (S339L fs*27) presented with myelokathexis and recurrent infections, without warts or hypogammaglobulinemia (9). Overall, the relationship between the clinical phenotype of WHIM syndrome and mutations needs to be further verified.

CXCR4 is a 7-transmembrane G protein-coupled receptor that binds CXCL12. The cytoplasmic C-terminal tail CXCR4 contains a series of phosphorylation motifs that regulate downstream signaling, β-arrestin binding, and the receptor’s internalization. Impaired internalization and heightened signaling responsiveness are characteristic features of the CXCR4WHIM receptors. Our study, along with previously published research, has demonstrated that CXCR4WHIM mutations result in diminished receptor internalization in response to CXCL12 stimulation. n our cohort, all four patients exhibited varying degrees of impaired CXCR4 internalization; pediatric patients showed reduced internalization, while adult patients demonstrated no internalization. However, previous studies have not extensively analyzed the relationship between age and the degree of CXCR4 internalization. We infer that the observed differences in our study may be attributed to factors such as disease heterogeneity, individual variation, age, CXCR4 expression levels, and environmental influences. Additionally, we found that both cell surface and total CXCR4 expression levels were higher in pediatric patients compared to adult patients. Assays measuring cellular chemotaxis in response to CXCL12, intracellular calcium mobilization, and PI3K-Akt/extracellular signal-regulated kinase activation have also been frequently utilized in our investigations. In our study we observed that the expression of p-AKT and p-ERK1/2 was elevated following CXCL12 stimulation, indicating hyperactive downstream signaling. However, some studies have reported no enhancement in the phosphorylation of AKT and ERK1/2 (29). Additionally, calcium mobilization responses varied among patients, with some showing increased levels while others demonstrated decreased levels (11, 12, 24, 33). These disparate outcomes within the same signaling pathway may contribute to the clinical heterogeneity observed among WHIM patients.

The CXCR4/CXCL12 axis is crucial for bone marrow colonization during development and for hematopoietic stem cell homeostasis (34). Meanwhile, CXCR4 plays a vital role in orchestrating both innate and adaptive immune responses by regulating the transport and distribution of leukocytes from peripheral tissues, as well as by enhancing T cell priming through its contribution to the formation and stability of immune synapses (35, 36). While circulating T cell counts may be reduced in WHIM patients, as previously reported, the decrease is less pronounced compared to that of B cells and neutrophils. CD4+T cell counts may remain within the reference range or exhibit slight reductions, whereas CD8+T numbers appear to be more adversely affected. Furthermore, the numbers of naïve T cell subset are diminished, likely due to reduced thymic output (22, 37, 38). In our findings, we also noted a decrease in TRECs in P1, P2 and P5. Additionally, the counts of naïve T cell, particularly naïve CD8+T cell, in the peripheral blood of the patients were significantly reduced. Whether this result was associated with decreased expression of CXCR4 on the surface of CD8+T cells rather than CD4+T cells requires further research.

CXCR4 is essential for the homing, development, and function of B cells. Throughout all stages of development, B cells typically express CXCR4 at markedly higher levels than most other leukocyte subsets (6, 39). Targeted deletion of CXCR4 in B cells results in premature egress of B cell precursors from the bone marrow and subsequent localization within splenic follicles, leading to a reduction in the number of mature B cells in the splenic marginal zone and primary follicles, as well as impaired T-independent antibody responses (40, 41). WHIM patients exhibit a diminished capacity to generate hypermutated IgG and an inability to initiate antigen-specific memory responses (39). In our study, we found that CXCR4 expression on the surface of B cells from all patients was significantly lower than that in HCs. Moreover, the number of B cell subsets was markedly reduced in our patients, with P5displaying the lowest count of B cell subsets. Additionally, KRECs were decreased in P1, P2 and P5. Furthermore, the production of PT-specific IgG by memory B cells from P2 was also reduced. While a reduction in B cells is a prominent hematological feature among WHIM patients (42), the mechanisms by which patients with severe B lymphopenia avoid hypogammaglobulinemia remain unclear.

WHIM syndrome is a relatively benign IEI characterized by low mortality rates. Currently, there is no standardized treatment protocol; the primary objective is to prevent HPV-related malignant and chronic sequelae resulting from recurrent infections (e.g., bronchiectasis and hearing loss). It is widely accepted that regular IVIG infusion and prophylactic antibiotics can help prevent recurrent respiratory and ear infections. G-CSF has proven effective in mobilizing neutrophils from the bone marrow into the bloodstream (10, 43). A completed phase III clinical trial of the CXCR4 antagonist plerixafor confirmed its superiority over G-CSF with in terms of wart regression and hematologic improvement (44). Additionally, a phase III trial of mavorixafor demonstrated its efficacy in increasing neutrophil and lymphocyte counts while alleviating infection (45). Regrettably, with the exception of irregular IgGRT, none of the patients P1-P4 received any additional treatments and are currently asymptomatic. Consequently, regular follow-up for these patients is essential.

In conclusion, we have detailed the clinical, genetic, immunological and treatment characteristic of four patients with the CXCR4V340fs WHIM mutation from a single Chinese family who exhibited atypical phenotypes. Given the high heterogeneity associated with WHIM syndrome, this study contributes to expanding the understanding of its clinical spectrum.

Data availability statement

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by Ethics Committee of the Children’s Hospital of Chongqing Medical University. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent for participation in this study was provided by the participants’ legal guardians/next of kin. Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s), and minor(s)’ legal guardian/next of kin, for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.

Author contributions

YH: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. LL: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. RC: Investigation, Writing – review & editing. LY: Investigation, Writing – review & editing. SZ: Investigation, Writing – review & editing. YJ: Investigation, Writing – review & editing. YD: Resources, Writing – review & editing. ZZ: Resources, Writing – review & editing. YA: Resources, Writing – review & editing. XT: Resources, Writing – review & editing. XZ: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing, Formal analysis. LZ: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This work are funded by National Science Foundation of China (82302055 National Science Foundation of China), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2024T171102) and Chongqing Postdoctoral Research Project Special Funding (2023CQBSHTB3108).

Acknowledgments

We thank the patients and their families for cooperation in this study. We also thank the members of the laboratory, the doctors, and nurses for supporting this project. We thank you for the support of the Biobank Center of Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2024.1460990/full#supplementary-material

References

1. Wetzler M, Talpaz M, Kleinerman ES, King A, Huh YO, Gutterman JU, et al. A new familial immunodeficiency disorder characterized by severe neutropenia, a defective marrow release mechanism, and hypogammaglobulinemia. Am J Med. (1990) 89:663–72. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(90)90187-i

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. McDermott DH, Gao JL, Liu Q, Siwicki M, Martens C, Jacobs P, et al. Chromothriptic cure of WHIM syndrome. Cell. (2015) 160:686–99. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.01.014

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Balabanian K, Lagane B, Pablos JL, Laurent L, Planchenault T, Verola O, et al. WHIM syndromes with different genetic anomalies are accounted for by impaired CXCR4 desensitization to CXCL12. Blood. (2005) 105:2449–57. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-06-2289

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Hernandez PA, Gorlin RJ, Lukens JN, Taniuchi S, Bohinjec J, Francois F, et al. Mutations in the chemokine receptor gene CXCR4 are associated with WHIM syndrome, a combined immunodeficiency disease. Nat Genet. (2003) 34:70–4. doi: 10.1038/ng1149

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Liu Q, Chen H, Ojode T, Gao X, Anaya-O’Brien S, Turner NA, et al. WHIM syndrome caused by a single amino acid substitution in the carboxy-tail of chemokine receptor CXCR4. Blood. (2012) 120:181–9. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-12-395608

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Pozzobon T, Goldoni G, Viola A, Molon B. CXCR4 signaling in health and disease. Immunol letters. (2016) 177:6–15. doi: 10.1016/j.imlet.2016.06.006

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Busillo JM, Armando S, Sengupta R, Meucci O, Bouvier M, Benovic JL. Site-specific phosphorylation of CXCR4 is dynamically regulated by multiple kinases and results in differential modulation of CXCR4 signaling. J Biol Chem. (2010) 285:7805–17. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.091173

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Xu C, Zhao H, Chen H, Yao Q. CXCR4 in breast cancer: oncogenic role and therapeutic targeting. Drug Des Devel Ther. (2015) 9:4953–64. doi: 10.2147/dddt.S84932

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Geier CB, Ellison M, Cruz R, Pawar S, Leiss-Piller A, Zmajkovicova K, et al. Disease progression of WHIM syndrome in an international cohort of 66 pediatric and adult patients. J Clin Immunol. (2022) 42:1748–65. doi: 10.1007/s10875-022-01312-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Heusinkveld LE, Majumdar S, Gao JL, McDermott DH, Murphy PM. WHIM syndrome: from pathogenesis towards personalized medicine and cure. J Clin Immunol. (2019) 39:532–56. doi: 10.1007/s10875-019-00665-w

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Zmajkovicova K, Pawar S, Sharapova SO, Geier CB, Wiest I, Nguyen C, et al. A novel transmembrane CXCR4 variant that expands the WHIM genotype-phenotype paradigm. Blood advances. (2024) 8:3754–9. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2023011875

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Zmajkovicova K, Nykamp K, Blair G, Yilmaz M, Walter JE. Expanding CXCR4 variant landscape in WHIM syndrome: integrating clinical and functional data for variant interpretation. Front Immunol. (2024) 15:1411141. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1411141

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. McDermott DH, Lopez J, Deng F, Liu Q, Ojode T, Chen H, et al. AMD3100 is a potent antagonist at CXCR4(R334X), a hyperfunctional mutant chemokine receptor and cause of WHIM syndrome. J Cell Mol Med. (2011) 15:2071–81. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2010.01210.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Kawai T, Malech HL. WHIM syndrome: congenital immune deficiency disease. Curr Opin hematol. (2009) 16:20–6. doi: 10.1097/MOH.0b013e32831ac557

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Yu L, Li W, Lv G, Sun G, Yang L, Chen J, et al. De novo somatic mosaicism of CYBB caused by intronic LINE-1 element insertion resulting in chronic granulomatous disease. J Clin Immunol. (2023) 43:88–100. doi: 10.1007/s10875-022-01347-w

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Ding Y, Zhou L, Xia Y, Wang W, Wang Y, Li L, et al. Reference values for peripheral blood lymphocyte subsets of healthy children in China. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2018) 142:970–973 e978. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2018.04.022

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Pinna D, Corti D, Jarrossay D, Sallusto F, Lanzavecchia A. Clonal dissection of the human memory B-cell repertoire following infection and vaccination. Eur J Immunol. (2009) 39:1260–70. doi: 10.1002/eji.200839129

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Jahnmatz M, Kesa G, Netterlid E, Buisman AM, Thorstensson R, Ahlborg N. Optimization of a human IgG B-cell ELISpot assay for the analysis of vaccine-induced B-cell responses. J Immunol Methods. (2013) 391:50–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2013.02.009

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Yu H, Ting Z, Yanjun J, Zhi C, Yunfei A, Xiaodong Z, et al. Clinical and immunological characteristics of a case with WHIM syndrome. Immunol J. (2020) 36:707–12. doi: 10.13431/j.cnki.immunol.j.20200111

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Evans MO 2nd, Petersen MM, Khojah A, Jyonouchi SC, Edwardson GS, Khan YW, et al. TREC screening for WHIM syndrome. J Clin Immunol. (2021) 41:621–8. doi: 10.1007/s10875-020-00921-4

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Yilmaz M, Potts DE, Geier C, Walter JE. Can we identify WHIM in infancy? Opportunities with the public newborn screening process. Am J Med Genet Part C Semin Med Genet. (2022) 190:215–21. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.32002

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Gulino AV, Moratto D, Sozzani S, Cavadini P, Otero K, Tassone L, et al. Altered leukocyte response to CXCL12 in patients with warts hypogammaglobulinemia, infections, myelokathexis (WHIM) syndrome. Blood. (2004) 104:444–52. doi: 10.1182/blood-2003-10-3532

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Liu Q, Pan C, Lopez L, Gao J, Velez D, Anaya-O’Brien S, et al. WHIM syndrome caused by Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia-associated mutation CXCR4 (L329fs). J Clin Immunol. (2016) 36:397–405. doi: 10.1007/s10875-016-0276-3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Zmajkovicova K, Pawar S, Maier-Munsa S, Maierhofer B, Wiest I, Skerlj R, et al. Genotype-phenotype correlations in WHIM syndrome: a systematic characterization of CXCR4(WHIM) variants. Genes immun. (2022) 23:196–204. doi: 10.1038/s41435-022-00181-9

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Quoyer J, Janz JM, Luo J, Ren Y, Armando S, Lukashova V, et al. Pepducin targeting the C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4 acts as a biased agonist favoring activation of the inhibitory G protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2013) 110:E5088–5097. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1312515110

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Luo J, De Pascali F, Richmond GW, Khojah AM, Benovic JL. Characterization of a new WHIM syndrome mutant reveals mechanistic differences in regulation of the chemokine receptor CXCR4. J Biol Chem. (2022) 298:101551. doi: 10.1016/j.jbc.2021.101551

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Zuelzer WW. Nyelokathexis”–A new form of chronic granulocytopenia. Report of a case. New Engl J Med. (1964) 270:699–704. doi: 10.1056/nejm196404022701402

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Matsubara K, Iwata A, Kawasaki Y, Honda Y, Yasumi T. Incomplete presentation of WHIM syndrome: the diagnostic role of dysmorphic neutrophils in bone marrow. J Pediatr hematology/oncol. (2020) 42:449–50. doi: 10.1097/mph.0000000000001894

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Rodríguez-Frade JM, González-Granado LI, Santiago CA, Mellado M. The complex nature of CXCR4 mutations in WHIM syndrome. Front Immunol. (2024) 15:1406532. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1406532

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Yuan A, Lee Y, Choi U, Moeckel G, Karihaloo A. Chemokine receptor Cxcr4 contributes to kidney fibrosis via multiple effectors. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. (2015) 308:F459–472. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00146.2014

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Mo H, Ren Q, Song D, Xu B, Zhou D, Hong X, et al. CXCR4 induces podocyte injury and proteinuria by activating β-catenin signaling. Theranostics. (2022) 12:767–81. doi: 10.7150/thno.65948

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Tassone L, Notarangelo LD, Bonomi V, Savoldi G, Sensi A, Soresina A, et al. Clinical and genetic diagnosis of warts, hypogammaglobulinemia, infections, and myelokathexis syndrome in 10 patients. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2009) 123:1170–3. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2008.12.1133

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Kumar R, Milanesi S, Szpakowska M, Dotta L, Di Silvestre D, Trotta AM, et al. Reduced G protein signaling despite impaired internalization and β-arrestin recruitment in patients carrying a CXCR4Leu317fsX3 mutation causing WHIM syndrome. JCI Insight. (2023) 8:e145688. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.145688

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Sugiyama T, Kohara H, Noda M, Nagasawa T. Maintenance of the hematopoietic stem cell pool by CXCL12-CXCR4 chemokine signaling in bone marrow stromal cell niches. Immunity. (2006) 25:977–88. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2006.10.016

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Stein JV, Nombela-Arrieta C. Chemokine control of lymphocyte trafficking: a general overview. Immunology. (2005) 116:1–12. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2005.02183.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Contento RL, Molon B, Boularan C, Pozzan T, Manes S, Marullo S, et al. CXCR4-CCR5: a couple modulating T cell functions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2008) 105:10101–6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0804286105

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

37. McDermott DH, Liu Q, Velez D, Lopez L, Anaya-O’Brien S, Ulrick J, et al. A phase 1 clinical trial of long-term, low-dose treatment of WHIM syndrome with the CXCR4 antagonist plerixafor. Blood. (2014) 123:2308–16. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-09-527226

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Moens L, Frans G, Bosch B, Bossuyt X, Verbinnen B, Poppe W, et al. Successful hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for myelofibrosis in an adult with warts-hypogammaglobulinemia-immunodeficiency-myelokathexis syndrome. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2016) 138:1485–1489.e1482. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2016.04.057

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Mc Guire PJ, Cunningham-Rundles C, Ochs H, Diaz GA. Oligoclonality, impaired class switch and B-cell memory responses in WHIM syndrome. Clin Immunol (Orlando Fla). (2010) 135:412–21. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2010.02.006

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Ma Q, Jones D, Borghesani PR, Segal RA, Nagasawa T, Kishimoto T, et al. Impaired B-lymphopoiesis, myelopoiesis, and derailed cerebellar neuron migration in CXCR4- and SDF-1-deficient mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (1998) 95:9448–53. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.16.9448

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Nie Y, Waite J, Brewer F, Sunshine MJ, Littman DR, Zou YR. The role of CXCR4 in maintaining peripheral B cell compartments and humoral immunity. J Exp Med. (2004) 200:1145–56. doi: 10.1084/jem.20041185

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Balabanian K, Brotin E, Biajoux V, Bouchet-Delbos L, Lainey E, Fenneteau O, et al. Proper desensitization of CXCR4 is required for lymphocyte development and peripheral compartmentalization in mice. Blood. (2012) 119:5722–30. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-01-403378

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Badolato R, Donadieu J. How I treat warts, hypogammaglobulinemia, infections, and myelokathexis syndrome. Blood. (2017) 130:2491–8. doi: 10.1182/blood-2017-02-708552

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

44. McDermott DH, Velez D, Cho E, Cowen EW, DiGiovanna JJ, Pastrana DV, et al. A phase 3 randomized crossover trial of plerixafor versus G-CSF for treatment of WHIM syndrome. J Clin Invest. (2023) 133:e164918. doi: 10.1172/jci164918

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Badolato R, Alsina L, Azar A, Bertrand Y, Bolyard AA, Dale D, et al. A phase 3 randomized trial of mavorixafor, a CXCR4 antagonist, for WHIM syndrome. Blood. (2024) 144:35–45. doi: 10.1182/blood.2023022658

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: CXCR4 variant, gain-of-function, inborn error of immunity, WHIM syndrome, heterogeneous phenotype

Citation: Huang Y, Li L, Chen R, Yu L, Zhao S, Jia Y, Dou Y, Zhang Z, An Y, Tang X, Zhao X and Zhou L (2024) Heterogeneous phenotype of a Chinese Familial WHIM syndrome with CXCR4V340fs gain-of-function mutation. Front. Immunol. 15:1460990. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1460990

Received: 07 July 2024; Accepted: 23 October 2024;
Published: 07 November 2024.

Edited by:

Attila Kumanovics, Mayo Clinic, United States

Reviewed by:

Uwe Kölsch, IMD Laboratory Berlin, Germany
Christoph B. Geier, University of Freiburg Medical Center, Germany
Teresa Kathleen Tarrant, Duke University, United States

Copyright © 2024 Huang, Li, Chen, Yu, Zhao, Jia, Dou, Zhang, An, Tang, Zhao and Zhou. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Lina Zhou, cmFjaGVsemhvdTg4QHFxLmNvbQ==; Xiaodong Zhao, emhhb3hkNTMwQGFsaXl1bi5jb20=

These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.