Abstract
Background:
The IL-33/ST2 axis plays a pivotal role in the development of IgE-mediated mast cell (MC) responses during food allergy. We recently demonstrated that the pleiotropic cytokine, IL-10, not only exerts proinflammatory effects on IgE-mediated MC activation, but also promotes IL-33-induced MC responses. However, whether IL-33 is necessary for IL-10’s proinflammatory effects has not been examined.
Methods:
To therefore determine the role of the IL-33/ST2 axis in this pathway, we assessed the effects of IL-10 on IgE-mediated MC activation and food allergy development in wild-type (WT) and ST2-/- mice.
Results:
IL-10 stimulation significantly enhanced IL-33 gene expression, ST2 receptor expression, cytokine production, mMCP-1 secretion, and proliferation in IgE and antigen-activated bone marrow-derived MCs (BMMCs) from WT mice. ST2-/- BMMCs exhibited reduced cytokine secretion in response to IgE-dependent activation. However, IL-10 enhanced cytokine production, mMCP-1 secretion, and proliferation in these cells as well. To further assess the role of IL-10, food allergy was induced in WT and ST2-/- mice subjected to antibody-mediated IL-10 depletion. IL-10-depleted WT mice exhibited a significant attenuation in MC-mediated responses to OVA challenge. While ST2-/- mice also exhibited a profound suppression of MC responses, IL-10 depletion had no additional effects. However, ST2-/-/IL-10-/- mice exhibited further decreases in OVA-IgE and antigen-specific MC activation compared to ST2-/- mice.
Conclusion:
Our data demonstrates that IL-10 can enhance MC responses in both WT and ST2-/- mice, further corroborating its proinflammatory effects on MCs and suggesting that they are not regulated by IL-33 signaling.
Introduction
Allergic sensitization to food allergens has been steadily increasing in the Western world (–). Mast cell (MC) activation induced by food allergen-specific IgE antibodies plays a critical role in the development of the allergic response, leading to various proinflammatory effects including vasodilation, smooth muscle hyperreactivity, and in rare cases, systemic anaphylactic reactions (–). Various endogenous and environmental factors are known to exert stimulatory effects on MCs to promote allergic sensitization. Of these, epicutaneous sensitization with food antigens leading to the production of the alarmin cytokine, IL-33, by epithelial cells, has been shown to have a prominent effect on MC activation and function (, ). Furthermore, we and others have shown that various Th2-derived cytokines such as IL-3, IL-4, IL-9 and IL-10 can have critical roles in promoting MC activation and function during food allergy (–).
We recently demonstrated that the pleiotropic cytokine, IL-10, has unexpected pro-inflammatory effects on MC responses (, , ). IL-10 promoted the activation and function of both IgE-activated and IL-33-stimulated MCs, leading to enhanced MC responses during food allergy (, ), passive anaphylaxis (), and type 2 inflammation (). In the absence of IL-10, food allergy development was attenuated, leading to decreased MC expansion and IgE-mediated MC activation (, ). Furthermore, the transfer of either IL-10-producing CD4+ T cells or WT MCs restored the development of food allergy in IL-10-/- mice (). The proinflammatory effects of IL-10 on MCs were also observed on bone marrow-derived MCs (BMMCs) in cell culture (, ). IL-10 directly promoted the proliferation and survival of these cells and enhanced the effects of IgE and/or IL-33-induced activation leading to increased secretion of granule contents and the production of type 2 cytokines such as IL-13 (, ). These effects correlated with enhanced expression of the FcεRI and ST2 receptors on MCs, suggesting that IL-10 enhances the responsiveness of MCs to their respective ligands (, ). These data are consistent with several other reports demonstrating similar effects of IL-10 on MCs both during allergic responses and other diseases (–).
In a similar vein, we recently also demonstrated a critical role for IL-33 in inducing MC expansion and activation during food allergy development (). IL-33 is a potent stimulator of MCs and can promote both IgE-dependent and independent MC-mediated inflammation (–32). MCs constitutively express the IL-33 receptor, ST2 (also called ST2L), which promotes MC differentiation and survival, induces antigen-independent degranulation, and elicits the production of cytokines such as IL-6 and IL-13 (, 33–35). Furthermore, MCs activated with IgE and antigen can produce IL-33 (35, 36) whereas IL-33-responding MCs have been shown to potentiate IgE-mediated responses (, , 36–42).
We therefore wondered whether the effects of IL-10 on MCs may be regulated by IL-33 signaling and investigated the role of IL-10 on MC activation and function during food allergy development in ST2-/- mice. Our data demonstrate that IL-10 enhances MC responses in both WT and ST2-/- mice, suggesting that IL-33 signaling is not required for IL-10’s effects either during IgE-mediated MC activation or food allergy. Furthermore, while both IL-33 and IL-10 were independently required for full MC responsiveness during food allergy, IL-10 deficiency further decreased MC responses in ST2-/- mice. Collectively, these data demonstrate that IL-10 is critical for allergen-specific MC responses in mice and that its proinflammatory effects extend beyond the IL-33/ST2 signaling axis.
Methods
Animals
BALB/c mice were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory and Envigo and used as WT controls in all experiments. IL-10-/- mice on the BALB/c background were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory. ST2-/- mice on the BALB/c background are a kind gift of Dr. Andrew McKenzie, Medical Research Council, United Kingdom and Drs. Paul Bryce and Gurjit Khurana Hershey. IL-10-/- and ST2-/- mice were crossed to generate ST2-/-/IL-10-/- mice. All mice were bred in our facilities and all animal research was performed as approved by the IACUCs at the respective institutions, Western New England University (protocol no. 2019-S1) and the University of Connecticut (protocol no. A22-048).
BMMC culture
BMMCs were generated from naïve WT BALB/c and ST2-/- animals as previously described (). Briefly, bone marrow cells were collected from the tibia and femurs of animals and cultured with 10 ng/ml of rIL-3 and rSCF (Shenandoah) for >4 weeks. Harvested BMMCs were positive for c-Kit and FcϵRI.
BMMC activation
1 million BMMCs/ml were cultured in triplicate with 10 ng/ml IL-3 and SCF. Cells were activated by pre-sensitizing with 1 µg/ml DNP-IgE (clone SPE7, Sigma) or vehicle (medium), followed by treatment with 200 ng/ml DNP-BSA (, 43). Some groups of cells were treated with 20 ng/ml of rIL-10 and/or rIL-33 (Biolegend) for various time periods (including 6 hours and 24hrs) prior to challenge with DNP-BSA. Thirty minutes to an hour after activation with DNP-BSA, cells were collected for isolation of RNA and cDNA was created. The cDNA was then used to assess the expression of various cytokine genes as described in the manuscript. In other experiments, supernatants were collected 6-24h later for the assessment of secreted cytokines by ELISA.
Quantitative PCR analysis and ELISAs
Quantitative RT-PCR was performed as previously described using Taqman probes (, 43). The expression of cytokine genes (IL-4, IL-5, IL-13, IL-10, IL-33, IFN-γ) was calculated relative to GAPDH transcripts. ELISAs for mMCP-1 (Thermofisher), IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, TNF-α and IFN-γ (Biolegend), IL-13 (R&D Systems), and OVA-IgE were performed according to manufacturers’ protocols as previously described (, 43).
BMMC proliferation
BMMCs were grown in rIL-3 and rSCF as described above. Some groups of cells were treated with 20 ng/ml of rIL-10. Cells were counted daily for 1-3 days and live cells were enumerated on the basis of trypan blue exclusion or using a quantitative tetrazolium reduction cell proliferation assay (MTS assay kit by Abcam). Cell proliferation was calculated based on OD using the formula: (OD of samples – OD of untreated control)/(OD of untreated control × 100).
β-hexosaminidase assay
BMMCs were cultured in the presence or absence of 20 ng/ml rIL-10 for 24 hours. Cells were activated with IgE and antigen and β-hex activity was assessed as previously described (44).
Flow cytometry
Cultured BMMCs were resuspended in staining medium (SM) containing 1X HBSS, HEPES buffer, and 2% fetal calf serum and incubated with mAbs against mouse c-Kit, FcεRI, and ST2 (Biolegend). Stained cells were then washed and assessed phenotypically by flow cytometry as previously described ().
Food allergy regimen
To induce food allergy, WT, IL-10-/-, ST2-/- and IL-10/ST2-/- mice were i.p. immunized with 50 μg chicken egg OVA in 1 mg alum twice (two weeks apart), as previously described (, 43, 45). Four weeks later, mice were challenged i.g. with 50 mg OVA on 6 alternating days. Control animals were i.p. sensitized but not challenged with OVA. To supplement knockout data, some groups of mice were also treated with blocking antibodies for IL-10. In these experiments, mice were treated i.p. with 100 μg purified anti-IL-10 (Biolegend) 6 different times immediately prior to OVA challenges. Mice were sacrificed one hour after the 6th challenge with OVA, and food allergy parameters were assessed as previously described (, 43, 46). Blood was collected for evaluation of antibodies and mMCP-1 in serum. Jejunum was collected for histological assessment of MCs and evaluation of cytokine gene expression by RT-PCR as described above.
Measurement of intestinal anaphylaxis
Intestinal anaphylaxis was assessed in challenged mice by scoring the percentage of animals exhibiting allergic diarrhea for one hour after OVA challenge (, 46).
Histological analysis and enumeration of MCs
Intestinal MCs were enumerated as we have previously described (). Briefly, paraffin-embedded jejunal sections were stained with chloroacetate esterase (CAE) and MCs were counted in complete cross-sections. Data are represented as the average numbers of MCs in 3 high-powered fields (HPF).
Passive anaphylaxis
WT and ST2-/- were sensitized i.v. with 6 μg DNP-IgE (clone SPE7, Sigma). 24h later, they were challenged i.v. with 75 μg of DNP-BSA, and changes in core body temperature were recorded using subcutaneously placed transponders (Biomedic Data Systems). To assess the effects of anti-IL-10 on the development of passive anaphylaxis, some mice were injected i.p. with 400 μg rIL-10 concurrently with the DNP-IgE injection.
Statistical analysis
Data are expressed as mean plus or minus standard error of mean, unless stated otherwise. Statistical significance comparing two groups of mice was determined using the unpaired or paired Student’s t-test as appropriate. Two-way analysis of variance was used to calculate differences between multiple groups.
Results
IL-10 enhances ST2 expression and promotes cytokine production in IL-33-stimulated MCs
We have previously demonstrated that IL-10 can enhance FcεRI expression and promote IgE-mediated activation in MCs (). Similarly, we recently observed that IL-10 can also significantly enhance the expression of the IL-33 receptor, ST2, and promote IL-33-induced type 2 cytokine production (). As shown in Figure 1A, treatment with IL-10 enhanced ST2 expression on WT BMMCs (Figure 1A). This was further increased in cells that were cultured with IL-10 and activated with IgE/Ag, suggesting that IL-10 can enhance IL-33 responsiveness during IgE-mediated activation (Figure 1A).
Figure 1
IL-33 signaling also plays a critical role in the development of allergic responses and endogenously produced IL-33 has been shown to regulate IgE-mediated MC activation (47, 48). To therefore further evaluate the effects of IL-10, we assessed whether IL-10 can also enhance IL-33 production in IgE/Ag-activated cells. As observed in Figure 1B (and data not shown), while we could not detect any IL-33 protein secretion, IL-10 significantly enhanced the transcriptional levels of IL-33 in IgE-activated cells. We have previously shown that IL-10 can also enhance the production of cytokines such as IL-6 and IL-13 in IL-33-stimulated MCs (). We therefore wondered whether IL-10 may have similar effects on IL-33 production in these cells. Interestingly, as observed in Figure 1C, IL-10 pre-treatment significantly enhanced IL-33 protein secretion in IL-33-treated BMMCs. Similarly, increased secretion of the cytokines IL-6 and IL-13 (Figures 1D, E) was also observed, suggesting that crosstalk between IL-10 and IL-33 may serve to further potentiate MC responses.
IL-10 enhances the IgE-mediated activation of ST2-/- BMMCs
To further investigate whether IL-33 signaling is necessary for IL-10’s effects, we next assessed cytokine production in unactivated and IgE-activated ST2-/- BMMCs. As previously observed (, ) and shown in Figures 2A-C, IL-10 significantly enhanced the production of IL-6 and IL-13 in both unactivated and IgE-activated WT BMMCs. Similarly, IL-10 pre-treatment also enhanced IL-6 and IL-13 production in unactivated ST2-/- BMMCs, suggesting that IL-33 signaling is not required for its effects. In general, ST2-/- BMMCs exhibited reduced cytokine responses after IgE-mediated activation (Figures 2A-C), although some variability was observed depending on experimental conditions (Supplementary Figures S1A-C). Pre-treatment with IL-10 enhanced the production of both IL-6 and IL-13 but not TNF-α in IgE-activated ST2-/- cells. A similar pattern was also observed after long-term culture (three days) with rIL-10 as we have previously shown (Supplementary Figures S1A-C). Taken together, these data suggest that IL-10 may further modulate the function of MCs in vivo, and that its effects on IgE-activated MCs are independent of IL-33 signaling. Next, we also assessed the effects of IL-10 on MC degranulation and murine MC protease (mMCP)-1 secretion. As observed in Figure 2D, both WT and ST2-/- BMMCs exhibited comparable levels of β-hex activity in response to IgE activation. IL-10 pre-treatment enhanced β-hex release in both cell types and this was higher in ST2-/- BMMCs compared to their WT counterparts. This suggests that while IL-10 can promote MC degranulation independently of IL-33 signaling, endogenous IL-33 may regulate some of its effects. Similarly, as previously shown by us (), IL-10 also enhanced mMCP-1 secretion in both WT and ST2-/- resting BMMCs (Figure 2E). However, lower mMCP-1 levels were observed in IL-10-treated ST2-/- BMMCs compared to WT cells. Interestingly, no mMCP-1 secretion was observed in either WT or ST2-/- BMMCs after activation with IgE and antigen (Figure 2E). Instead, IL-10 stimulation led to mMCP-1 secretion in these cells as well (Figure 2E). Finally, we have previously shown that IL-10 can also promote MC proliferation during cell culture (, ). To assess whether IL-33 signaling may be required in this process, we next also assessed the proliferation of both WT and ST2-/- BMMCs. As observed in Figure 2F, IL-10 enhanced the proliferation of BMMCs from both strains. Furthermore, greater proliferation was observed in ST2-/- BMMCs treated with IL-10. While the mechanism for this is unclear, these data further underscore the role of IL-10 and suggest that IL-33 signaling is not required for its effects.
Figure 2
Allergic responses to enteral ovalbumin administration are suppressed in ST2-/- mice
Recently, IL-33 has emerged as a critical mediator of MC responses during food allergy (, , 49–51). To further investigate the crosstalk between IL-10 and IL-33, and whether IL-10’s effects on IgE-induced MC responses may depend on IL-33, we assessed the development of food allergy in WT and IL-10-depleted ST2-/- mice using an ovalbumin (OVA)-induced model of intestinal anaphylaxis. We and others have previously shown that the development of food allergy in this model is IgE and MC-dependent (, , 43, 46, 52). Similarly, we recently also demonstrated a critical role for IL-33 in inducing MC responses in this model (). Lastly, using both IL-10-/- mice () as well as pharmacological blockade of IL-10 (), we have shown that MC responses and the development of intestinal anaphylaxis in this model are also IL-10-dependent. We therefore hypothesized that this would be a good system to assess the roles of IL-10 and IL-33 and their interrelated effects on MCs.
Briefly, WT and ST2-/- mice were i.p. sensitized with chicken egg OVA and alum as previously described and subsequently challenged orally with OVA to induce the development of intestinal anaphylaxis. As demonstrated in Figure 3A and Supplementary Figure S2A, WT BALB/c mice developed profuse diarrhea after the sixth oral gavage, accompanied by a robust OVA-specific IgE-mediated response (Figure 3B, Supplementary Figure S2B). Histological analysis using chloroacetate esterase staining revealed a significant recruitment of mature degranulating MCs to the small intestine of WT OVA mice compared to unchallenged controls (Figure 3C, Supplementary Figure S2C). Furthermore, assessment of MC activation in WT mice revealed the presence of elevated levels of serum mMCP-1, a marker correlated with the degranulation of mucosal MCs (Figure 3D, Supplementary Figure S2D). In contrast to these positive markers of food allergy in WT mice and as previously observed by us (), ST2-/- animals did not develop allergic diarrhea or exhibit MC-mediated activation, suggesting that the IgE and MC-dependent effects of food allergy require IL-33 signaling (Figures 3A-D).
Figure 3
Pharmacological IL-10 depletion has no additional effects on MC responses in ST2-/- mice
To next examine the effects of IL-10 depletion, some groups of mice were treated with anti-IL-10 during the acute, MC-dependent, challenge phase of the model as described above. As expected and consistent with our previous findings (), anti-IL-10 treatment in WT mice significantly attenuated MC responses including decreased allergic diarrhea (Figure 3A), OVA-specific IgE production (Figure 3B), intestinal MC numbers (Figure 3C) and mMCP-1 levels (Figure 3D). Interestingly, however, treatment with anti-IL-10 had no additional effects in ST2-/- mice, including changes in allergic diarrhea, OVA-IgE or MC numbers, or intestinal cytokine expression in ST2-/- mice (Figures 3A-J). mMCP-1 levels were below the limits of detection in ST2-/- animals, except in the case of one mouse (Figure 3D). These data suggest that IL-33 signaling is not required for IL-10’s effects on MCs in the food allergy model.
To next assess the effects of IL-10 on intestinal type 2 cytokine expression, we examined jejunal tissue from experimental animals for various cytokine transcripts. As we have previously reported, while the expression of IL-4, IL-5, IL-13, and IL-10 was increased in the jejunae of allergic WT mice, the induction of these cytokines was significantly decreased in both ST2-/- and anti-IL-10-treated WT mice (Figures 3E-H). In contrast, no significant differences were observed between control and anti-IL-10-treated ST2-/- mice. Furthermore, no significant differences were observed in the expression of IFN-γ or IL-33 between any of the groups (Figures 3I, J).
We have previously shown that ST2-/- mice exhibit reduced IL-4 responses during food allergy which may affect the development of antigen-specific IgE (). Similarly, IL-10 has also been shown to play an important role in the development of IgE production (53–55). To therefore ascertain whether the effects of anti-IL-10 in our system may be related to reduced IgE responses as opposed to functional defects in MCs, we next assessed the development of IgE-mediated passive anaphylaxis in anti-IL-10-treated naïve WT and ST2-/- mice. As observed in Supplementary Figure S3, IgE-sensitized WT mice exhibited significant drops in core body temperature after intravenous antigen administration. In contrast, the induction of hypothermia was delayed in ST2-/- mice. Anti-IL-10 treatment attenuated the development of passive anaphylaxis in WT mice, suggesting that basal IL-10 levels may prime MC responsiveness to IgE-mediated activation. This is also consistent with our previous observation demonstrating that exogenous IL-10 priming can enhance IgE-mediated passive anaphylaxis (). However, similar effects were not observed in ST2-/- mice. While anti-IL-10 treatment initially had no effect in these mice, a more sustained hypothermic response was observed in anti-IL-10-treated ST2-/- mice, suggesting that other factors may also be involved in these animals, including effects on basophils and other cell types. Taken together, these data suggest that the reduced MC responses in both ST2-/- mice and anti-IL-10-treated WT mice during food allergy occur irrespectively of IgE levels and may result directly as a consequence of functional deficiencies in MCs.
MC responses and food allergy are further diminished in ST2-/- mice deficient in IL-10
Considering that ST2-/- mice exhibit profoundly attenuated MC responses during food allergy and to rule out any variability that may be associated with the pharmacological depletion of IL-10, we next generated mice with a genetic deficiency in both IL-10 and ST2, and examined their susceptibility to the development of food allergy. As observed in Figure 4, neither ST2-/- nor ST2-/-/IL-10-/- OVA-sensitized mice developed diarrhea in response to OVA challenges (Figure 4A). As expected, OVA-IgE levels (Figure 4B) and MC responses including intestinal MC numbers and mMCP-1 levels were decreased in the absence of IL-33 signaling (Figures 4C, D). To our surprise, however, genetic deletion of IL-10 in these animals further decreased the levels of OVA-IgE and mMCP-1 levels (Figures 4B, D). This was also accompanied by a decrease in the number of intestinal MCs (Figure 4C). These data suggest that mice with an intrinsic deficiency in both ST2 and IL-10 are further protected from food allergy development and that IL-10 can regulate the IgE-mediated activation of MCs even in the absence of IL-33 signaling.
Figure 4
Discussion
In this study, we sought to investigate whether the proinflammatory effects of IL-10 on IgE-mediated MC activation may be regulated by IL-33. While we found that IL-10 can promote IL-33 gene expression and its secretion in BMMCs, it could enhance IgE-mediated activation even in ST2-/- BMMCs, demonstrating that IL-33 signaling is not required for IL-10’s effects. These observations were extended in vivo, where we found that although the IL-33/ST2 axis was required for MC responses during food allergy, IL-10’s proinflammatory effects on MCs were independent of IL-33 signaling. Instead, IL-10 also promoted IgE-dependent responses in ST2-/- mice. These data further confirm the role of IL-10 as a potent costimulator of MC responses that can prime MCs for IL-33 responsiveness, but the effects of which are not dependent on endogenous IL-33 signaling.
IL-10 is a pleiotropic cytokine that is known to have both pro- and anti-inflammatory effects (56–58). We and others have demonstrated that IL-10 can play critical roles during allergic responses and exert pro-inflammatory effects on MCs and other cells. IL-10 was initially identified as a MC stimulator and shown to promote mMCP-1 expression in MCs (, , 59–62). Similarly, IL-10 can also induce IL-9 production by IgE-cross-linked MCs (). While some studies had suggested that IL-10 may induce suppression of IgE-mediated signaling in MCs (63, 64), more recently, several investigators including us, have shown that IL-10 can promote MC responses during food allergy (), enhance STAT3 and miR-155-induced IgE-mediated activation (), and promote MC expansion and activity during small bowel cancer (). Several studies also suggest that IL-10 can have mixed (pro- and anti-inflammatory) effects during allergic inflammation. Interestingly, some of these demonstrated that IL-10 can promote the development of airway hyperresponsiveness, mucus metaplasia, IL-5 production, eosinophilia, dendritic cell polarization and a Th2-skewed phenotype in allergic mice (53, 54, 65–73). More recently, IL-10 was shown to both be required for the development of allergen-specific TH2 cells as well as promote effector T cell function (74). Similarly, B cell-derived IL-10 promoted allergic sensitization during asthma (75).
In a recent report, we demonstrated that IL-10 can not only promote IgE-dependent MC responses, but also potently co-stimulate IL-33-stimulated MCs by increasing ST2 responsiveness (). These observations suggest that IL-10’s proinflammatory effects on MCs may be global in nature and not restricted to IgE-allergen crosslinking. Considering that MCs have previously been shown to produce IL-33, we therefore wondered whether MC-derived IL-33 may regulate IL-10’s effects. Interestingly, while in our hands, we could not detect IL-33 protein secretion in IgE-activated cells, IL-10 pre-treatment enhanced IL-33 mRNA expression in these cells. Similarly, IL-10 treatment also enhanced the production of IL-33 in IL-33-treated BMMCs. Finally, while ST2-/- MCs exhibited reduced cytokine responses when activated with IgE and antigen, IL-10 was able to enhance cytokine secretion, degranulation, mMCP-1 release, and proliferation in these cells as well. Collectively, these data suggest that endogenous IL-33 signaling in MCs is not required for IL-10’s proinflammatory effects on MC activation or function.
These observations prompted us to further explore the interactions of IL-10 in the context of IgE and IL-33-mediated signaling during physiological allergic responses in vivo. The role of IL-33 in regulating MC responses during allergic inflammation is well-established (, 33, 48, 76). IL-33-responding MCs have been shown to promote IgE-dependent responses, enhance proinflammatory cytokine production, and facilitate allergic symptoms including bronchoconstriction, IL-13-induced mucus secretion, and systemic anaphylaxis (, , 36–42). Conversely, MCs and their mediators also amplify IL-33-mediated inflammation, by enhancing the recruitment of leukocytes and promoting the activation of group 2 innate lymphoid cells (ILC2s) (77). Furthermore, release of IL-33 by epithelial cells early during allergic inflammation results in the activation of both MCs and ILC2s, leading to either the enhancement of inflammation or its regulation depending on the context and the type of allergen (, 41, 78, 79).
Several studies have demonstrated the importance of IL-33 signaling during food allergy. However, depending on the model systems used, divergent effects on MC activation, intestinal MC numbers, and allergen-specific Th2 cells have been observed. Food allergy induction in epicutaneously sensitized mice or mice with alterations in IL-4 signaling was attenuated in ST2-/- mice, suggesting that IL-33-mediated signals are critical for the development of oral anaphylaxis in mice, and that IL-33 promotes food anaphylaxis by targeting MCs or ILC2s (, , 49–51, 80). However, in the absence of ST2, while cutaneously sensitized mice were protected from anaphylaxis due to decreased MC activation and mMCP-1 levels, no changes in systemic and intestinal MC numbers were observed, suggesting normal MC expansion (). Similarly, no differences in TH2 cytokines or IgE antibodies were also observed (). In contrast, other investigators observed decreased TH2 responses and reduced MC accumulation during allergic responses (including asthma) in ST2-/- mice (, 50, 51, 81). In our hands, we observed both decreased MC activation and expansion as well as Th2 cytokine gene expression in the intestinal anaphylaxis model (). While these dichotomous observations may be a consequence of different experimental models and sensitization regimens, they further strengthen the importance of IL-33 in modulating MC responses in vivo.
Our findings also further confirm the importance of IL-10 in regulating MC responses during the development of food allergy. As we have previously observed, both IL-10-deficiency and anti-IL-10 treatments attenuated allergic symptoms, accompanied by decreased MC activation, TH2 cytokine expression, and intestinal MC expansion (, ). In this study, we demonstrate that IL-10 is able to regulate IgE-mediated MC proliferation and activation as well as MC responses during food allergy even in the absence of IL-33 signaling, suggesting that IL-33 is dispensable for IL-10’s effects. Interestingly, while this was suggested by both antibody-mediated depletion as well as genetic deletion of IL-10, a few subtle differences were observed between the two strategies. Anti-IL-10 treatment in ST2-/- mice had no further effects on IgE levels, intestinal MC numbers, MC activation and jejunal TH2 cytokine expression (Figure 3). In contrast, genetic deletion of IL-10 led to a greater reduction in MC responses in ST2-/- mice (Figure 4). While these differences may be due to the variability involved with antibody-mediated targeting approaches, they may also point to different effects of IL-10 during the allergen sensitization and challenge phases as the anti-IL-10 treatments were only performed during OVA challenge. In this context, while IL-10 is known to promote the induction of antigen-specific IgE (53) and IL-33 is a potent stimulator of Th2 cells (82), the passive anaphylaxis study in Supplementary Figure S3, suggests that their individual effects on MCs are independent of circulating IgE levels. Taken together, the data from both model systems collectively suggests that IL-10’s effects on MCs can extend beyond IL-33 signaling. Furthermore, while both IL-33 and IL-10 may act as independent variables that regulate MC function during food allergy, these data also point to a potential for synergistic control if it were necessary.
In summary, our study not only further corroborates the proinflammatory role of IL-10 on MCs during allergic sensitization but suggests that it has unilateral effects on MCs that are independent of other MC stimulators such as IL-33. The mechanisms by which IL-10 exerts these effects need to be further investigated.
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Ethics statement
The animal study was approved by Western New England University and the University of Connecticut Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees. The study was conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements.
Author contributions
DK: Investigation, Writing – review & editing. SR: Investigation, Writing – review & editing. SS: Methodology, Writing – review & editing. CM: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. NJ: Investigation, Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This project was supported by funds from the National Institutes of Health grants: NIAID R15AI107668 and RO1 AI167884-01A1(CM).
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to Dr. Andrew McKenzie (Medical Research Council, UK) for the provision of ST2-/- mice. We would like to thank Nicole Maldonado Perez, Stephanie Polukort and Jeffrey Rovatti for expert technical assistance.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2025.1526498/full#supplementary-material
Supplementary Figure 1Long-term IL-10 culture enhances cytokine secretion in IgE-activated ST2-/- BMMCs. (A-C) WT and ST2-/- BMMCs were cultured with or without rIL-10 for 3 days and subsequently activated with IgE and antigen. Supernatants were collected and cytokine secretion was assessed. *p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001 (t-test).
Supplementary Figure 2MC responses and food allergy development are attenuated in ST2-/- mice. BALB/c and ST2-/- mice were sensitized and challenged with OVA as described in Methods. One hour after the 6th challenge, the following parameters were measured: (A) occurrence of diarrhea; (B) serum OVA-IgE levels; (C) CAE+ MCs in the jejunum (magnification: 40X; arrows depict MCs); (D) serum mMCP-1 levels. Data are representative of >3 experiments. n=5-7 mice/group. ND, not detected. *p<0.05; **p<0.01 (t-test).
Supplementary Figure 3Anti-IL-10 treatment attenuates IgE-mediated passive anaphylaxis in WT mice. Naïve BALB/c and ST2-/- mice were injected i.v. with 6 μg DNP-IgE. Some groups of mice were treated i.p. with 400 μg anti-IL-10. 24h later, all mice were injected i.v. with 75 μg DNP-BSA and changes in body temperature were measured. n=4-5 mice/group. **p<0.05 for the WT group compared with WT plus anti-IL-10-treated mice by 2-way ANOVA; ***p<0.05 for the WT group compared with ST2-/- mice and the ST2-/- group compared with anti-IL-10-treated ST2-/- mice by 2-way ANOVA.
Abbreviations
OVA, Ovalbumin; WT, Wild-type; BMMCs, Bone marrow derived MCs.
References
1
RenzHAllenKJSichererSHSampsonHALackGBeyerKet al. Food allergy. Nat Rev Dis Primers. (2018) 4:17098. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2017.98
2
SichererSHSampsonHA. Food allergy: A review and update on epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, prevention, and management. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2018) 141:41–58. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2017.11.003
3
TomarSHoganSP. Recent advances in mechanisms of food allergy and anaphylaxis. F1000Res. (2020) 9:F1000 Faculty Rev-863. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.25638.1
4
SampsonHAO'MahonyLBurksAWPlautMLackGAkdisCA. Mechanisms of food allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2018) 141:11–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2017.11.005
5
El AnsariYSKanagarathamCOettgenHC. Mast cells as regulators of adaptive immune responses in food allergy. Yale J Biol Med. (2020) 93:711–8.
6
LopesJPSichererS. Food allergy: epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment. Curr Opin Immunol. (2020) 66:57–64. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2020.03.014
7
ChuDKLlop-GuevaraAWalkerTDFladerKGoncharovaSBoudreauJEet al. IL-33, but not thymic stromal lymphopoietin or IL-25, is central to mite and peanut allergic sensitization. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2013) 131:187–200 e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2012.08.002
8
GalandCLeyva-CastilloJMYoonJHanALeeMSMcKenzieANet al. IL-33 promotes food anaphylaxis in epicutaneously sensitized mice by targeting mast cells. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2016) 138:1356–66. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2016.03.056
9
ForbesEEGroschwitzKAboniaJPBrandtEBCohenEBlanchardCet al. IL-9- and mast cell-mediated intestinal permeability predisposes to oral antigen hypersensitivity. J Exp Med. (2008) 205:897–913. doi: 10.1084/jem.20071046
10
MathiasCBHobsonSAGarcia-LloretMLawsonGPoddigheDFreyschmidtEJet al. IgE-mediated systemic anaphylaxis and impaired tolerance to food antigens in mice with enhanced IL-4 receptor signaling. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2011) 127:795–805 e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2010.11.009
11
BurtonOTDarlingARZhouJSNoval-RivasMJonesTGGurishMFet al. Direct effects of IL-4 on mast cells drive their intestinal expansion and increase susceptibility to anaphylaxis in a murine model of food allergy. Mucosal Immunol. (2013) 6:740–50. doi: 10.1038/mi.2012.112
12
ChenCYLeeJBLiuBOhtaSWangPYKartashovAVet al. Induction of interleukin-9-producing mucosal mast cells promotes susceptibility to IgE-mediated experimental food allergy. Immunity. (2015) 43:788–802. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2015.08.020
13
BarrettNAAustenKF. Licensed to ill: IL-9 generation in immature mast cells permits food-elicited anaphylaxis. Immunity. (2015) 43:626–8. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2015.09.011
14
PolukortSHRovattiJCarlsonLThompsonCSer-DolanskyJKinneySRet al. IL-10 enhances IgE-mediated mast cell responses and is essential for the development of experimental food allergy in IL-10-deficient mice. J Immunol. (2016) 196:4865–76. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1600066
15
FuYWangJZhouBPajulasAGaoHRamdasBet al. An IL-9-pulmonary macrophage axis defines the allergic lung inflammatory environment. Sci Immunol. (2022) 7:eabi9768. doi: 10.1126/sciimmunol.abi9768
16
UlrichBJKharwadkarRChuMPajulasAMuralidharanCKohBet al. Allergic airway recall responses require IL-9 from resident memory CD4(+) T cells. Sci Immunol. (2022) 7:eabg9296. doi: 10.1126/sciimmunol.abg9296
17
KrajewskiDRanjitkarSTedeschiCPerezNMJordanNMireMet al. IL-10 neutralization attenuates mast cell responses in a murine model of experimental food allergy. Immunohorizons. (2024) 8:431–41. doi: 10.4049/immunohorizons.2400002
18
RanjitkarSKrajewskiDGarciaCTedeschiCPolukortSHRovattiJet al. IL-10 differentially promotes mast cell responsiveness to IL-33, resulting in enhancement of type 2 inflammation and suppression of neutrophilia. J Immunol. (2024) 212(9):1407–19. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.2300884
19
Thompson-SnipesLDharVBondMWMosmannTRMooreKWRennickDM. Interleukin 10: A novel stimulatory factor for mast cells and their progenitors. J Exp Med. (1991) 173:507–10. doi: 10.1084/jem.173.2.507
20
GhildyalNMcNeilHPStechschulteSAustenKFSilbersteinDGurishMFet al. IL-10 induces transcription of the gene for mouse mast cell protease-1, a serine protease preferentially expressed in mucosal mast cells of trichinella spiralis-infected mice. J Immunol. (1992) 149:2123–9. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.149.6.2123
21
StassenMArnoldMHultnerLMullerCNeudorflCReinekeTet al. Murine bone marrow-derived mast cells as potent producers of IL-9: costimulatory function of IL-10 and kit ligand in the presence of IL-1. J Immunol. (2000) 164:5549–55. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.164.11.5549
22
TraumDTimotheePSilverJRose-JohnSErnstMLaRosaDF. IL-10-induced gp130 expression in mouse mast cells permits IL-6 trans-signaling. J Leukoc Biol. (2012) 91:427–35. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0411209
23
QayumAAParanjapeAAbebayehuDKolawoleEMHaqueTTMcLeodJJet al. IL-10-induced mir-155 targets socs1 to enhance IgE-mediated mast cell function. J Immunol. (2016) 196:4457–67. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1502240
24
SaadallaAMOsmanAGurishMFDennisKLBlatnerNRPezeshkiAet al. Mast cells promote small bowel cancer in a tumor stage-specific and cytokine-dependent manner. Proc Natl Acad Sci U.S.A. (2018) 115(7):1588–92. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1716804115
25
Riquelme-NeiraRWalker-VergaraRFernandez-BlancoJAVergaraP. IL-10 modulates the expression and activation of pattern recognition receptors in mast cells. Int J Mol Sci. (2023) 24(12):9875. doi: 10.3390/ijms24129875
26
RanjitkarSKrajewskiDTedeschiCPerezNMJordanNGregoryKet al. Mast cell responses in a mouse model of food allergy are regulated via a ST2/IL-4 axis. Allergy. (2024) 79:2561–4. doi: 10.1111/all.16257
27
JouliaRL'FaqihiFEValituttiSEspinosaE. IL-33 fine tunes mast cell degranulation and chemokine production at the single-cell level. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2016) 140(2):497–509.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2016.09.049
28
Lunderius-AnderssonCEnokssonMNilssonG. Mast cells respond to cell injury through the recognition of IL-33. Front Immunol. (2012) 3:82. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2012.00082
29
SabatinoGNicolettiMNeriGSagginiARosatiMContiFet al. Impact of IL-9 and IL-33 in mast cells. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. (2012) 26:577–86.
30
SalujaRKhanMChurchMKMaurerM. The role of IL-33 and mast cells in allergy and inflammation. Clin Transl Allergy. (2015) 5:33. doi: 10.1186/s13601-015-0076-5
31
SalujaRZoltowskaAKetelaarMENilssonG. IL-33 and thymic stromal lymphopoietin in mast cell functions. Eur J Pharmacol. (2016) 778:68–76. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2015.04.047
32
CayrolCGirardJP. IL-33: an alarmin cytokine with crucial roles in innate immunity, inflammation and allergy. Curr Opin Immunol. (2014) 31:31–7. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2014.09.004
33
AllakhverdiZSmithDEComeauMRDelespesseG. Cutting edge: the ST2 ligand IL-33 potently activates and drives maturation of human mast cells. J Immunol. (2007) 179:2051–4. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.179.4.2051
34
HoLHOhnoTObokiKKajiwaraNSutoHIikuraMet al. IL-33 induces IL-13 production by mouse mast cells independently of ige-fcepsilonri signals. J Leukoc Biol. (2007) 82:1481–90. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0407200
35
HsuCLNeilsenCVBrycePJ. IL-33 is produced by mast cells and regulates ige-dependent inflammation. PloS One. (2010) 5:e11944. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011944
36
HsuCLChhibaKDKrier-BurrisRHosakoppalSBerdnikovsSMillerMLet al. Allergic inflammation is initiated by IL-33-dependent crosstalk between mast cells and basophils. PloS One. (2020) 15:e0226701. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226701
37
ChoKASuhJWSohnJHParkJWLeeHKangJLet al. IL-33 induces Th17-mediated airway inflammation via mast cells in ovalbumin-challenged mice. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. (2012) 302:L429–40. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00252.2011
38
KaurDGomezEDoeCBerairRWoodmanLSaundersRet al. IL-33 drives airway hyper-responsiveness through IL-13-mediated mast cell: airway smooth muscle crosstalk. Allergy. (2015) 70:556–67. doi: 10.1111/all.12593
39
LiuTKanaokaYBarrettNAFengCGarofaloDLaiJet al. Aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease involves a cysteinyl leukotriene-driven IL-33-mediated mast cell activation pathway. J Immunol. (2015) 195:3537–45. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1500905
40
NagarkarDRRamirez-CarrozziVChoyDFLeeKSorianoRJiaGet al. IL-13 mediates IL-33-dependent mast cell and type 2 innate lymphoid cell effects on bronchial epithelial cells. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2015) 136:202–5. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2015.01.036
41
KhodounMVTomarSTockerJEWangYHFinkelmanFD. Prevention of food allergy development and suppression of established food allergy by neutralization of thymic stromal lymphopoietin, IL-25, and IL-33. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2018) 141:171–9 e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2017.02.046
42
LiuTBarrettNAKanaokaYYoshimotoEGarofaloDCirkaHet al. Type 2 cysteinyl leukotriene receptors drive IL-33-dependent type 2 immunopathology and aspirin sensitivity. J Immunol. (2018) 200:915–27. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1700603
43
KrajewskiDKaczenskiERovattiJPolukortSThompsonCDollardCet al. Epigenetic regulation via altered histone acetylation results in suppression of mast cell function and mast cell-mediated food allergic responses. Front Immunol. (2018) 9:2414. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02414
44
KalesnikoffJHuberMLamVDamenJEZhangJSiraganianRPet al. Monomeric IgE stimulates signaling pathways in mast cells that lead to cytokine production and cell survival. Immunity. (2001) 14:801–11. doi: 10.1016/S1074-7613(01)00159-5
45
KrajewskiDPolukortSHGelzinisJRovattiJKaczenskiEGalinskiCet al. Protein disulfide isomerases regulate IgE-mediated mast cell responses and their inhibition confers protective effects during food allergy. Front Immunol. (2020) 11:606837. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.606837
46
KinneySRCarlsonLSer-DolanskyJThompsonCShahSGambrahAet al. Curcumin ingestion inhibits mastocytosis and suppresses intestinal anaphylaxis in a murine model of food allergy. PloS One. (2015) 10:e0132467. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132467
47
HsuCLBrycePJ. Inducible IL-33 expression by mast cells is regulated by a calcium-dependent pathway. J Immunol. (2012) 189:3421–9. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1201224
48
CayrolCGirardJP. Interleukin-33 (IL-33): A nuclear cytokine from the IL-1 family. Immunol Rev. (2018) 281:154–68. doi: 10.1111/imr.12619
49
Noval RivasMBurtonOTOettgenHCChatilaT. IL-4 production by group 2 innate lymphoid cells promotes food allergy by blocking regulatory T-cell function. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2016) 138:801–11 e9. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2016.02.030
50
KhodounMVTomarSTockerJEWangYHFinkelmanFD. Prevention of food allergy development and suppression of established food allergy by neutralization of tslp, IL-25 and IL-33. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2017) 141(1):171–9.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2017.02.046
51
BrandtEBRuffBPFilutaALChangWCShikDKhurana HersheyGK. Thymic stromal lymphopoietin rather than IL-33 drives food allergy after epicutaneous sensitization to food allergen. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2023) 151:1660–6 e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2023.02.025
52
BrandtEBStraitRTHershkoDWangQMuntelEEScribnerTAet al. Mast cells are required for experimental oral allergen-induced diarrhea. J Clin Invest. (2003) 112:1666–77. doi: 10.1172/JCI19785
53
OhmoriHKandaTTakaiTHikidaM. Induction of antigen-specific ige response in murine lymphocytes by IL-10. Immunol Lett. (1995) 47:127–32. doi: 10.1016/0165-2478(95)00084-I
54
KobayashiNNagumoHAgematsuK. IL-10 enhances B-cell ige synthesis by promoting differentiation into plasma cells, a process that is inhibited by cd27/cd70 interaction. Clin Exp Immunol. (2002) 129:446–52. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2249.2002.01932.x
55
XieMMChenQLiuHYangKKohBWuHet al. T follicular regulatory cells and IL-10 promote food antigen-specific ige. J Clin Invest. (2020) 130:3820–32. doi: 10.1172/JCI132249
56
RennickDBergDHollandG. Interleukin 10: an overview. Prog Growth Factor Res. (1992) 4:207–27. doi: 10.1016/0955-2235(92)90020-I
57
MooreKWO'GarraAde Waal MalefytRVieiraPMosmannTR. Interleukin-10. Annu Rev Immunol. (1993) 11:165–90. doi: 10.1146/annurev.iy.11.040193.001121
58
MooreKWde Waal MalefytRCoffmanRLO'GarraA. Interleukin-10 and the interleukin-10 receptor. Annu Rev Immunol. (2001) 19:683–765. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.19.1.683
59
RennickDHunteBDangWThompson-SnipesLHudakS. Interleukin-10 promotes the growth of megakaryocyte, mast cell, and multilineage colonies: analysis with committed progenitors and thy1losca1+ Stem cells. Exp Hematol. (1994) 22:136–41.
60
EklundKKGhildyalNAustenKFFriendDSSchillerVStevensRL. Mouse bone marrow-derived mast cells (Mbmmc) obtained in vitro from mice that are mast cell-deficient in vivo express the same panel of granule proteases as mbmmc and serosal mast cells from their normal littermates. J Exp Med. (1994) 180:67–73. doi: 10.1084/jem.180.1.67
61
GhildyalNFriendDSNicodemusCFAustenKFStevensRL. Reversible expression of mouse mast cell protease 2 mrna and protein in cultured mast cells exposed to IL-10. J Immunol. (1993) 151:3206–14. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.151.6.3206
62
StevensRLFriendDSMcNeilHPSchillerVGhildyalNAustenKF. Strain-specific and tissue-specific expression of mouse mast cell secretory granule proteases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U.S.A. (1994) 91:128–32.
63
GillespieSRDeMartinoRRZhuJChongHJRamirezCShelburneCPet al. IL-10 inhibits fc epsilon ri expression in mouse mast cells. J Immunol. (2004) 172:3181–8. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.172.5.3181
64
Kennedy NortonSBarnsteinBBrenzovichJBaileyDPKashyapMSpeiranKet al. IL-10 suppresses mast cell ige receptor expression and signaling in vitro and in vivo. J Immunol. (2008) 180:2848–54. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.180.5.2848
65
van ScottMRJusticeJPBradfieldJFEnrightESigounasASurS. IL-10 reduces th2 cytokine production and eosinophilia but augments airway reactivity in allergic mice. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. (2000) 278:L667–74. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.2000.278.4.L667
66
YangXWangSFanYHanX. IL-10 deficiency prevents IL-5 overproduction and eosinophilic inflammation in a murine model of asthma-like reaction. Eur J Immunol. (2000) 30:382–91. doi: 10.1002/1521-4141(200002)30:2<382::AID-IMMU382>3.0.CO;2-L
67
MakelaMJKanehiroABorishLDakhamaALoaderJJoethamAet al. IL-10 Is Necessary for the Expression of Airway Hyperresponsiveness but Not Pulmonary Inflammation after Allergic Sensitization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U.S.A. (2000) 97:6007–12. doi: 10.1073/pnas.100118997100118997
68
JusticeJPShibataYSurSMustafaJFanMVan ScottMR. IL-10 gene knockout attenuates allergen-induced airway hyperresponsiveness in C57bl/6 mice. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. (2001) 280:L363–8. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.2001.280.2.L363
69
LamblinCDesreumauxPColombelJFTonnelABWallaertB. Overexpression of IL-10 mRNA in gut mucosa of patients with allergic asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2001) 107:739–41. doi: 10.1067/mai.2001.114111
70
OhJWSeroogyCMMeyerEHAkbariOBerryGFathmanCGet al. CD4 T-helper cells engineered to produce IL-10 prevent allergen-induced airway hyperreactivity and inflammation. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2002) 110:460–8. doi: 10.1067/mai.2002.127512
71
KosakaSTamauchiHTerashimaMMaruyamaHHabuSKitasatoH. IL-10 controls Th2-type cytokine production and eosinophil infiltration in a mouse model of allergic airway inflammation. Immunobiology. (2011) 216(7):811–20. doi: 10.1016/j.imbio.2010.12.003
72
LaouiniDAleniusHBrycePOettgenHTsitsikovEGehaRS. IL-10 is critical for Th2 responses in a murine model of allergic dermatitis. J Clin Invest. (2003) 112:1058–66. doi: 10.1172/JCI18246
73
DardalhonVAwasthiAKwonHGalileosGGaoWSobelRAet al. IL-4 inhibits TGF-beta-induced Foxp3+ T cells and, together with TGF-beta, generates IL-9+ IL-10+ Foxp3(-) effector T cells. Nat Immunol. (2008) 9:1347–55. doi: 10.1038/ni.1677
74
HeKHettingaAKaleSLHuSXieMMDentALet al. Blimp-1 is essential for allergen-induced asthma and Th2 cell development in the lung. J Exp Med. (2020) 217(7):e20190742. doi: 10.1084/jem.20190742
75
QianGJiangWSunDSunZChenAFangHet al. B-cell-derived IL-10 promotes allergic sensitization in asthma regulated by bcl-3. Cell Mol Immunol. (2023) 20:1313–27. doi: 10.1038/s41423-023-01079-w
76
SchmitzJOwyangAOldhamESongYMurphyEMcClanahanTKet al. IL-33, an interleukin-1-like cytokine that signals via the IL-1 receptor-related protein ST2 and induces T helper type 2-associated cytokines. Immunity. (2005) 23:479–90. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2005.09.015
77
ShimokawaCKanayaTHachisukaMIshiwataKHisaedaHKurashimaYet al. Mast cells are crucial for induction of group 2 innate lymphoid cells and clearance of helminth infections. Immunity. (2017) 46:863–74 e4. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2017.04.017
78
PiehlerDEschkeMSchulzeBProtschkaMMullerUGrahnertAet al. The IL-33 receptor (ST2) regulates early IL-13 production in fungus-induced allergic airway inflammation. Mucosal Immunol. (2016) 9:937–49. doi: 10.1038/mi.2015.106
79
StierMTZhangJGoleniewskaKCephusJYRusznakMWuLet al. IL-33 promotes the egress of group 2 innate lymphoid cells from the bone marrow. J Exp Med. (2018) 215:263–81. doi: 10.1084/jem.20170449
80
SavinkoTKarisolaPLehtimakiSLappetelainenAMHaapakoskiRWolffHet al. ST2 regulates allergic airway inflammation and T-cell polarization in epicutaneously sensitized mice. J Invest Dermatol. (2013) 133:2522–9. doi: 10.1038/jid.2013.195
81
ChenCCKobayashiTIijimaKHsuFCKitaH. IL-33 dysregulates regulatory T cells and impairs established immunologic tolerance in the lungs. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2017) 140(5):1351–63.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2017.01.015
82
CayrolCGirardJP. Interleukin-33 (IL-33): A critical review of its biology and the mechanisms involved in its release as a potent extracellular cytokine. Cytokine. (2022) 156:155891. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2022.155891
Summary
Keywords
mast cells, food allergy, IL-10, IL-33, allergy
Citation
Krajewski D, Ranjitkar S, Jordan N, Schneider SS and Mathias CB (2025) IL-33 signaling is dispensable for the IL-10-induced enhancement of mast cell responses during food allergy. Front. Immunol. 16:1526498. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1526498
Received
11 November 2024
Accepted
08 January 2025
Published
28 January 2025
Volume
16 - 2025
Edited by
Glenn Cruse, North Carolina State University, United States
Reviewed by
Adrian Piliponsky, Seattle Children’s Research Institute, United States
Tamara Haque, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIH), United States
Updates
Copyright
© 2025 Krajewski, Ranjitkar, Jordan, Schneider and Mathias.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Clinton B. Mathias, clinton.mathias@uconn.edu
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.