ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Immunol.
Sec. Nutritional Immunology
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1583351
Dietary supplementation with L-carnitine elevates intracellular carnitine levels, and affects gene expression of SLC25A20 and COX4I1, as well as non-mitochondrial respiration of bovine blood cells during systemic immune challenge
Provisionally accepted- 1Institute for Animal Nutrition, Federal Research Institute for Animal Health, Friedrich Loeffler Institute, Braunschweig, Germany
- 2Institute of Animal Nutrition, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Hannover, Germany
- 3Institute of Animal Science, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
- 4Institute of Animal Nutrition and Nutritional Physiology, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Nutritional Sciences, and Environmental Management, University of Giessen, Giessen, Germany
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
L-carnitine plays a key role in shuttling free fatty acids from the cytosol into the mitochondrial matrix. Fatty acids, among other substrates, are utilized by immune cells as an energy source. Therefore, L-carnitine, which is authorized as a feed additive in cattle, may influence the metabolism of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) during an immune challenge. To test this hypothesis, a feeding trial was conducted with 53 German Holstein cows, comprising a control group (CON, n = 26) and an L-carnitine supplemented group (CAR, n = 27, 25 g rumen-protected Lcarnitine/cow/d). On day 111 after calving, all cows were intravenously injected with lipopolysaccharides (LPS, 0.5 µg/kg body weight as bolus injection, E. coli) to induce a systemic immune challenge. Blood samples were collected on day 143 ante injectionem (ai), day 11 ai, 24 hours post injectionem (pi), and day 14 pi and PBMC were isolated. The used methods included high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry, Alamar Blue assay, realtime qPCR, and the Mito Stress Test of the Seahorse Analyzer (Agilent, Santa Clara, California, USA). L-carnitine supplementation significantly increased intracellular concentrations of carnitine and its precursor γ-butyrobetaine in PBMC of dairy cows. The gene expression of carnitineacylcarnitine translocase (SLC25A20) in PBMC remained stable in CAR, whereas it was upregulated in CON during the LPS challenge, suggesting an adaptation to increased energy demands in CON. A contrasting pattern was detected for the gene expression of cytochrome c oxidase subunit 4I1 (COX4I1), with stable levels in CON and a downregulation in CAR due to LPS injection. However, most of the investigated genes were unaffected by L-carnitine supplementation, and responded significantly to LPS injection. The same applied for PBMC mitochondrial functionality and metabolic activity as assessed by ex vivo approaches, whereas non-mitochondrial respiration rate was significantly affected by L-carnitine supplementation over time. In conclusion, dietary L-carnitine supplementation of 25 g per cow per day led to a balanced distribution of carnitine and γbutyrobetaine between bovine blood cells and plasma, but there were only minor effects on gene level and cellular respiration.
Keywords: L-Carnitine, Dairy cow, mid-lactation, lipopolysaccharide, PBMC
Received: 25 Feb 2025; Accepted: 12 Jun 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Seemann, Kersten, Bühler, Billenkamp, Meyer, Visscher, Huber, Most, Eder, Dänicke and Frahm. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Jana Frahm, Institute for Animal Nutrition, Federal Research Institute for Animal Health, Friedrich Loeffler Institute, Braunschweig, Germany
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.