ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Immunol.

Sec. Vaccines and Molecular Therapeutics

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1585284

Correlation between Microneutralization Test and a Multiplexed Immunoassay for evaluation of Monkeypox and Vaccinia virus antibodies before and after smallpox vaccination

Provisionally accepted
Serena  MarchiSerena Marchi1*Giulia  PicciniGiulia Piccini2Ed  RemarqueEd Remarque3Giulia  RosciaGiulia Roscia2Bianca  SempliciBianca Semplici2Paolo  CantaloniPaolo Cantaloni2Noemi  GuerriniNoemi Guerrini2Roberta  ZannellaRoberta Zannella2Rosa  ColuccioRosa Coluccio2Linda  BenincasaLinda Benincasa2Niccolò  SolfanelliNiccolò Solfanelli2Claudia  Maria TrombettaClaudia Maria Trombetta1EMANUELE  MONTOMOLIEMANUELE MONTOMOLI1,2,4Alessandro  ManentiAlessandro Manenti2
  • 1University of Siena, Siena, Italy
  • 2Vismederi srl, Siena, Tuscany, Italy
  • 3Biomedical Primate Research Centre (BPRC), Rijswijk, Netherlands, Netherlands
  • 4Vismederi Research srl, Siena, Tuscany, Italy

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Monkeypox (mpox), an endemic zoonotic viral disease in Central and Western Africa, gained international attention in 2022 when clade IIb of the Monkeypox virus (MPXV) spread outside Africa, prompting the World Health Organization (WHO) to declare it a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC). Although the PHEIC was lifted in 2023 due to declining global cases, a resurgence caused by clade Ib has reinstated the emergency status. Current mpox vaccines, based on live-attenuated or modified vaccinia virus (VACV), have historical use in smallpox prevention. Understanding the humoral immune response triggered by mpox vaccination and infection, as well as identifying correlates of protection, remain however critical.In a previous study, we evaluated the neutralizing antibody response of 1,000 individuals, half born before the cessation of smallpox vaccination in Italy (pre-1975) and half after (post-1979). Higher neutralizing antibody titres against MPXV and VACV were observed in subjects vaccinated against smallpox, indicating a cross-reactive immunity to MPXV. This study further investigated these findings by analysing the IgG response to five MPXV and five VACV antigens in a subset of the previously tested cohort, using a multiplex immunoassay. Serum samples from 370 individuals were grouped by neutralization profile (negative for both MPXV and VACV, positive for both viruses, negative for MPXV but positive for VACV, and vice versa) and age (born before 1975 and after 1979). Our data revealed stronger immune responses to specific antigens, particularly A35R/A33R and B6R/B5R, with MPXV-specific binding antibodies showing greater cross-reactivity compared to VACV ones. Furthermore, individuals born before 1975, vaccinated against smallpox, exhibited stronger binding and neutralizing antibody responses, as opposed to people born after 1979 in whom neutralization titers were lower. This suggests that prior VACV-vaccination and subsequent boosting from potential other OPXV encounters in the older population may have resulted in a more VACV-specific immune response over time.This study provides insights into the antigenic determinants of MPXV and VACV antibody cross-reactivity and highlights differences in immune profiles across age and exposure groups. Results obtained suggest that VACV-vaccine imprinting shapes immunity, which could guide the development of more effective vaccine strategies for preventing mpox.

Keywords: Monkeypox virus, Vaccinia virus, binding and neutralizing antibodies, crossreactive antibody response, humoral immunity

Received: 28 Feb 2025; Accepted: 02 Jun 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Marchi, Piccini, Remarque, Roscia, Semplici, Cantaloni, Guerrini, Zannella, Coluccio, Benincasa, Solfanelli, Trombetta, MONTOMOLI and Manenti. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Serena Marchi, University of Siena, Siena, Italy

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.