HYPOTHESIS AND THEORY article
Front. Immunol.
Sec. Systems Immunology
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1585421
Antibodies and cryptographic hash functions: quantifying the specificity paradox
Provisionally accepted- Harvard University, Cambridge, United States
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
The specificity of the immune response is critical to its biological function, yet the generality of immune recognition implies that antibody binding is multispecific or degenerate. The current work explores and quantifies this paradox through a systems analysis approach that incorporates set theoretic ideas and an application of structural and statistical modeling to prior experimental immunological and biochemical data. Order-of-magnitude estimates are computed for the average degeneracies and specificities of antibodies and epitopes using a chemico-spatial model for epitope diversity and a binary model for antibody-antigen binding. The results illustrate and quantify how the humoral immune system achieves both high specificity and high degeneracy simultaneously by effectively decoupling the two properties, similarly to programs in cryptography called secure hash algorithms (SHAs), which display the same paradoxical features. In addition, an antibody-epitope interaction probability model is used to help show how newly formed antibodies may avoid cross-reactivity with self-antigens despite their high degree of multispecificity and how the requirement of polyclonal binding likely improves the overall specificity of the immune response. Because they describe the relationships between various statistical parameters in humoral immunity, the models developed here may also have predictive utility.
Keywords: Antibodies, Adaptive Immune system, receptors, Antigens, Epitopes, degeneracy, Polyspecificity, Polyreactivity
Received: 28 Feb 2025; Accepted: 13 Oct 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Petrella. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Robert J. Petrella, robertjpetrella@yahoo.com
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.