Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Immunol.

Sec. Microbial Immunology

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1610001

Prognostic value of gut microbiota and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol subfractions in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

Provisionally accepted
Siliang  XiaSiliang Xia1Yun  LiuYun Liu1Mengzhu  WangMengzhu Wang2Dandan  LiuDandan Liu1Xiaobing  ZhangXiaobing Zhang1Lin  LingLin Ling2Ming  WenMing Wen2Shushen  JiShushen Ji2Jiaying  LiJiaying Li3Xiangming  ZhangXiangming Zhang1Huihui  JiangHuihui Jiang2*
  • 1Department of Cardiology, Nanjing Jiangbei Hospital, Nanjing, China
  • 2Shanghai Biotecan Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China
  • 3Teaching Research Department, Changji Branch of the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Changji, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Objective: Gut dysbiosis and the distribution of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) subfractions have been implicated in cardiovascular risk among patients with STsegment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, the prognostic significance of LDL-C subfractions in relation to gut microbiota composition remains largely unexplored.This study aimed to assess differences in gut microbiota profiles and LDL-C subfraction distribution between patients with STEMI with and without major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) and to elucidate their potential interplay.Methods: We enrolled 32 male population without coronary heart disease and 66 male patients with STEMI. Fecal samples were analyzed via 16S rDNA gene sequencing to assess gut microbiota diversity and composition. Plasma LDL-C subfractions were quantified using the Quantimetrix Lipoprint LDL System.Results: Among these 66 STEMI patients, 18 experienced MACEs during a median followup of 13 months (MACEs group), while 18 age-matched event-free patients were selected as controls (Non-MACEs group). Significant differences in gut microbiota composition, but not diversity, were observed between the two groups, with the Non-MACEs group exhibiting a greater number of marker genera. Although no significant differences were found in LDL-C subfractions between groups, multiple significant negative correlations were identified between gut microbiota and LDL-C subfractions in the MACEs group, including between Coprococcus and LDLC-4 (ρ=-0.5488, P<0.05), between Coprococcus and LDLC-5 (ρ=-0.6418, P<0.01), between Coprococcus and LDLC-6 (ρ=-0.4988, P<0.05), between UCG-002 and LDLC-4 (ρ=-0.4948, P<0.05), and betweenChristensenellaceae_R-7_group and LDLC-4 (ρ=-0.5032, P<0.05). Furthermore, gut microbiota markers demonstrated superior predictive performance for MACEs compared to LDL-C subfractions, with UCG-002, Christensenellaceae_R-7_group, andNK4A214_group achieving AUC values >0.75.Gut microbiota, particularly UCG-002, Christensenellaceae_R-7_group, andNK4A214_group, exhibit greater prognostic potential for MACEs than LDL-C subfractions.These findings highlight the role of gut microbiota in post-STEMI risk stratification, underscoring its potential as a target for future cardiovascular interventions.

Keywords: ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, Gut Microbiota, LDL-C subfractions, Interaction, Risk factors

Received: 11 Apr 2025; Accepted: 22 Jul 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Xia, Liu, Wang, Liu, Zhang, Ling, Wen, Ji, Li, Zhang and Jiang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Huihui Jiang, Shanghai Biotecan Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.