ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Immunol.

Sec. Parasite Immunology

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1620366

This article is part of the Research TopicDissecting malaria protective immunity: acquired by natural infection and/or vaccinationView all 6 articles

Vaccine-induced responses to R21/Matrix-M -an analysis of samples from a phase 1b age de-escalation, dose-escalation trial

Provisionally accepted
  • 1KEMRI Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya
  • 2The Jenner Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
  • 3Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
  • 4Ifakara Health Institute, Bagamoyo Research and Training Centre, Bagamoyo, Tanzania
  • 5GSK Vaccines Institute for Global Health S.r.l.. Via Fiorentina 1, 53100, Siena, Italy

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

The pre-erythrocytic malaria vaccine R21 vaccine adjuvanted with Matrix-M reported good efficacy (75%) in an ongoing phase 3 trial and was recommended World Health Organization for use in children 5-36 months. Vaccine-induced antibodies against NANP are associated with protection, however, various factors such as age, pre-existing immunity, and vaccine dose have been shown to influence vaccine responses.Methods: Samples from adults (n =18), children (n = 17), and infants (n = 51) vaccinated with R21/Matrix-M in a phase I trial were assayed for vaccine-specific antibody responses. We measured antibodies (quantity) by MSD and ELISA; and function (quality) by complement (C1q) fixation assay, inhibition of sporozoite invasion (ISI) assay, and avidity assay. Pre-existing malaria antibody exposure was assessed using an anti-3D7 Plasmodium falciparum crude parasite lysate ELISA.Results: Vaccine-induced CSP antibodies (against full-length R21, NANP, and C terminus), exhibited complement fixation and inhibition of sporozoites. These were significantly lower in adults compared to children and infants. Additionally, children had a higher rate of decay of vaccine-induced antibodies compared to adults 2 years post-vaccination. Furthermore, a higher Matrix-M adjuvant dose resulted in significantly higher C1q fixation, and ISI than the low adjuvant dose in infants. Importantly, functional measures ISI and C1q-fixation were positively associated with the vaccine-induced antibodies overall, but avidity was not. Interestingly, in adults, previous malaria exposure was negatively associated with ISI but positively correlated with avidity and C1q fixation. At baseline, all the study participants were seropositive for anti-HBsAg IgG above the WHO-required protective threshold of 10 mIU/mL, and titres significantly increased postvaccination.Discussion: R21/Matrix-M was immunogenic across all age groups, with age and vaccine dose significantly affecting antibody magnitude and function. These findings emphasize the importance of evaluating the right adjuvant and vaccine dose for clinical development progression. This could thus inform the development of next-generation malaria vaccines. However, additional crucial factors need further exploration.

Keywords: Malaria, Vaccines, R21, Immunogenicity, antibody, past exposure

Received: 29 Apr 2025; Accepted: 27 May 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Bundi, Bellamy, Kibwana, Nyamako, Ogwang, Keter, KIMANI, Salman, Provstgaard-Morys, Stockdale, Hill, Bejon, Olotu, Hamaluba, Ewer and Kapulu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Caroline Bundi, KEMRI Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.