EDITORIAL article
Front. Immunol.
Sec. Microbial Immunology
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1665988
This article is part of the Research TopicImmune Response in Tuberculosis with Comorbidities or CoinfectionsView all 11 articles
Immune Response in Tuberculosis with Comorbidities or Coinfections 2
Provisionally accepted- 1Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas (INI), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- 2Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- 32. Department of ICER, National Institutes of Health-National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases-International Center for Excellence in Research, Chennai, India, Chennai, India
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Tuberculosis (TB) remains a leading cause of infectious disease mortality globally. Its pathogenesis is now understood to be heavily shaped by immunometabolic perturbations and host comorbidities. In this context, the ten articles summarized in this editorial collectively deepen our understanding of how metabolic disorders, immune-mediated diseases, helminth infections, and viral coinfections converge to modulate TB immune response, whose profiles may be associated with disease susceptibility or post-treatment outcomes. Several studies in this collection illuminate the complex interplay between diabetes mellitus (DM) and TB. Araujo-Pereira et al. (2024) https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2024.1484143 offer a comprehensive overview of TB-DM comorbidity, identifying chronic systemic inflammation and impaired immune regulation as pivotal mechanisms fueling susceptibility and complicating treatment. Complementing this, Ssekamatte et al. (2024) https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2025.1566449 show how type 2 diabetes alters Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb)-specific CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T-cell phenotypes, reducing interferon gamma production and this occurs via an increasing of programmed cell death protein-1 expression, underscoring the impact of functional immune exhaustion in individuals with latent Mtb infection (LTBI). Rajamanickam et al. (2024) further demonstrate that TB with prediabetes is characterized by exacerbated profiles of pro-inflammatory cytokine and chemokine, linking immune dysfunction to glycemic dysregulation. Additionally, Ranaivomanana et al. (2025) https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2024.1451046 reveal that DM skews longitudinal treatment monitoring biomarkers—specifically, the monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio and the release of interferon gamma produced by T-cells specific to Mtb antigens—potentially limiting their interpretive value in diabetic TB patients. A critical implication of these findings is the pressing need for immunomonitoring tools and personalized treatment strategies for TB-DM patients, especially in low-resource settings where this comorbidity is on the rise. Beyond metabolic disorders, anemia emerges as an underappreciated but potent modulator of TB outcomes. Dasan et al. (2025) https://doi.org/10.3389/ftubr.2024.1462654 demonstrate that anemic TB patients experience higher bacterial burdens, more extensive lung pathology, and worse treatment outcomes. These effects are mediated through an imbalanced cytokine milieu favoring pro-fibrotic and inflammatory pathways. This adds a new dimension to TB management, suggesting that addressing anemia could serve as an adjunctive intervention. The immune landscape is further complicated by helminth coinfections, as shown by Pushpamithran and Blomgran (2024) https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2024.1454881. Their data indicates that Ascaris lumbricoides antigen exposure reprograms macrophage-derived extracellular vesicles (EVs) to enhance Mtb control while dampening Interleukin-1 betaproduction, via microRNA-mediated modulation of Phosphoinositide 3-kinase/Akt pathway and Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase pathways. This illustrates the immunoregulatory potential of helminths and the therapeutic promise of EVs as immunomodulators in TB. Autoimmune conditions and their treatments also significantly affect TB immunobiology. Farroni et al. (2025) https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2024.1484143 report that patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMID), such as rheumatoid arthritis, retain intact Mtb-specific immune responses production, and this occurs via via in vitro bacterial control, despite their underlying immune dysfunction and immunosuppressive therapies. However, Picchianti-Diamanti et al. (2025) https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2025.1494283 warn that immunomodulatory biologics, particularly tumor necrosis factor inhibitors and Janus tyrosine kinase inhibitors, significantly increase TB risk, underscoring the importance of rigorous LTBI screening and prophylaxis in these populations. The discrepancy between preserved immune function and elevated TB risk raises important questions about the balance between systemic and compartmentalized immunity in the context of immunosuppressive biologic therapies. Although the relationship between other viral infections and TB is not as strong as that of human immunodeficiency virus, some can affect immunity and increase the risk of developing the disease or worsening its course. However, due to its recent circulation in the population, little is known about the impact of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 on patients infected with Mtb Peña-Bates et al. (2025) https://doi.org/10.3389/ftubr.2024.1487793 show that individuals with LTBI and mild coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) exhibit enhanced CD8⁺ T cell cytotoxicity, mitochondrial stability, and attenuated pro-inflammatory cytokine secretion compared to Covid-19-only patients, suggesting a potentially immune modulation conditioning by LTBI. Meanwhile, Kameni et al. (2025) https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2025.1533213 reveal that polymorphisms in the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 gene influence cytokine responses in TB-Covid-19 co-infection, suggesting that host genetics modulate disease severity in co-infected individuals. Together, these studies underscore the necessity for an integrative view of TB pathogenesis, one that incorporates immunogenetics, comorbidity profiles, and host-pathogen-microbiome interactions. They also call for the development of stratified treatment and monitoring protocols that reflect the heterogeneity of TB hosts in real-world clinical settings. However, gaps remain. While robust in design, several studies rely on small cohorts, lack longitudinal validation or confined to geographically distinct locations. Functional studies linking cytokine signatures to bacterial clearance or tissue pathology are needed to move from correlation to causation. Moreover, the interplay between metabolic control (e.g., glycated hemoglobin levels) and immune trajectory during TB therapy is insufficiently characterized, limiting translational applications. In conclusion, the convergence of TB with metabolic, autoimmune, parasitic, and viral comorbidities demands a multidimensional approach to research and care. Immunological profiling, coupled with genetic screening and clinical biomarkers, holds promise for identifying vulnerable subpopulations and optimizing TB control strategies. As these findings integrate into practice, they may finally tilt the balance in the global fight against TB.
Keywords: Tuberculosis, immune response, Coinfection, comorbidities, Helmint
Received: 14 Jul 2025; Accepted: 23 Jul 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Cavalcanti Rolla, Gomes-Silva and Babu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Valeria Cavalcanti Rolla, Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas (INI), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.