Sukanya Narasimhan
Maria Kazimirova
Stephen Wikel- 1Section of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
- 2Institute of Zoology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovakia
- 3Department of Medical Sciences, Frank H. Netter, M.D. School of Medicine, Quinnipiac University, Hamden, CT, United States
Editorial on the Research Topic
Skin - confluence of vertebrate host defences, arthropod vectors, and vector-borne pathogens
Arthropod blood feeding, pathogen transmission, nuisance, and biting related injury are long-standing and increasingly important global threats to human and animal health. Arthropod interactions with vertebrate hosts occur at the cutaneous interface, a structural and immunological barrier rich in interconnected somatosensory elements, multiple resident and migrating immune cell types, and a complex, changing array of soluble response mediators (1–3). Vertebrate skin presents a mixed milieu of attraction and defense elements for the arthropod vector. The skin with its microbiome, metabolites, and odorants provides the chemical cues critical for determining vector-host preference (4–6). The skin microbiome may also set the immunological stage that determines critical host defense responses that the vector encounters during its treacherous mission of taking a bloodmeal and that the vector-borne pathogen encounters during its transmission and establishment in the host (7–9).
Blood feeding arthropods possess mouthpart structures and feeding strategies that are divided into the two broad categories of obtaining a blood meal from within the lumen of a blood vessel, solenophages, or creating a pool of blood by lacerating dermal blood vessels, telmophages (10, 11). Blood meal uptake occurs over the course of minutes for mosquitoes, biting flies, fleas, bed bugs, and triatomines; one to two hours for argasid ticks, and days to more than a week for ixodid ticks that also secrete attachment cement to aid in securing themselves to the bite site (12–14). Regardless of the mechanism or duration of feeding, successful acquisition of a blood meal is dependent not just upon the diverse immunomodulatory components of arthropod saliva secreted into the skin at the bite site during feeding, but also critically influenced by host defense responses to the vector saliva molecules deposited in the skin. The tug-of-war interactions that ensue between the vector and host skin defenses shape the evolution of vector-host relationships (15) resulting in host resistance or susceptibility to the vector.
Exploring the dynamics of vector-host interactions Kamran et al. describe efforts to define host biomarkers of ectoparasite resistance. The study focuses on the important veterinary pest Haematobia irritans exigua, buffalo fly, close relative of Haematobia irritans irritans, horn fly, both of whom are blood feeding dipterans responsible for economic losses estimated for horn fly in the United States to be one billion dollars annually (16). Buffalo flies are obligate blood feeders taking 20 to 40 blood meals per day (17). Bites of these flies cause severe cutaneous irritation resulting in open sores. To define biomarkers associated with enhanced fly resistance, the authors used LC-MS/MS to compare the serum proteome profile of Brangus cattle that supported high (HF) or low Buffalo fly (LF) infestations and demonstrated that proteins associated with wound healing, phagocytosis and coagulation were significantly increased in LF cattle compared to that in HF cattle. These observations offer additional biomarkers that synergize with ongoing efforts to breed cattle with increased disease resistance (18, 19).
Paine et al. examine tick transmission of Powassan virus, a neuroinvasive virus of public health importance, to vertebrate hosts under controlled, laboratory conditions. Studying this virus by tick transmission is essential due to the role tick saliva molecules play in facilitating host neuroinvasion by Powassan virus (20). Furthermore, Powassan virus is unique among Ixodes scapularis transmitted infectious agents in that transmission occurs as rapidly as fifteen minutes after tick attachment to the host (21), while other I. scapularis-transmitted pathogens require hours to days of blood feeding before successful transmission occurs (28). Paine et al. provide insights into how infestation with Ixodes scapularis impacts cutaneous global transcriptomic changes at the tick bite site during the earliest timepoints for Powassan virus transmission.
Advances in proteomics and genomics are facilitating a molecular understanding of how vector saliva molecules interact with host resident and migrating cells, signaling molecules, and receptors during and following blood feeding to provide novel insights into the interactions between vertebrate skin, arthropod vectors, and vector-borne pathogens (22, 23). Since the tick remains attached to the mammalian host for hours to days, depending on the tick species, the tick needs to modulate cutaneous innate and adaptive immune responses at the tick-host interface. Kleissl et al. provide an insightful review on tick saliva that examines how the tick exploits an array of biological functions of salivary proteins, peptides, small molecules, and non-coding RNAs in tick saliva to perform an astonishing variety of “tricks” at the host skin-vector interface that are critical to successful blood feeding.
Highlighting the importance of pharmacological activities in tick saliva, Molari et al. examine protease inhibitors, a predominant super family of proteins secreted in tick saliva (24). The study focuses on the cystatin family of protease inhibitors that inhibit cysteine proteases involved in multiple host defense response pathways including neutrophil recruitment, antigen processing and presentation, and apoptosis (25). The authors demonstrate that Amblyostatin-1, a secreted salivary cystatin from Amblyomma sculptum, a neotropical hard tick that is a vector of Rickettsia rickettsii, the agent of Rocky Mountain/Brazilian spotted fever, inhibits Cathepsin-S, a cysteine protease crucial for proper antigen loading and presentation on MHC-II by dendritic cells (26). Amblyostatin-1 impairs the function of dendritic cells (DCs) in the mammalian skin and in-turn the development of antibody responses to salivary antigens. Interestingly, Amblyostatin-1 also promotes the secretion of IL-10, an anti-inflammatory cytokine, by DCs. Exploiting a mouse model of carrageenan-induced inflammation (27), the authors show that Amblyostatin-1 reduced edema and neutrophil recruitment-induced cutaneous inflammation. Amblyostatin-like molecules represent exciting opportunities for the development of novel therapeutics for inflammatory diseases in humans.
The molecular repertoire of the saliva of hematophagous arthropod vectors evolved over millions of years to perfect the pharmacological functions that ensure successful blood feeding. Undoubtedly, evolution continues within, among, and across all parties in the hematophagous arthropod –host –arthropod transmitted pathogens triad. While our understanding of these relationships has advanced significantly during the past 50 years, we are only beginning to realize the multifaceted complexity, roles, dynamic crosstalk, and beauty of these interactions.
Author contributions
SN: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. MK: Writing – review & editing. SW: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1. Kabashima K, Honda T, Ginhoux F, and Egawa G. The immunological anatomy of the skin. Nat Rev Immunol. (2019) 19:19–30. doi: 10.1038/s41577-018-0084-5
2. Mansfield K and Naik S. Unraveling immune-epithelial interactions in skin homeostasis and injury. Yale J Biol Med. (2020) 93:133–43.
3. Tamari M, Ver Heul AM, and Kim BS. Immunosensation: neuroimmune cross talk in the skin. Annu Rev Immunol. (2021) 39:369–93. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-101719-113805
4. Guha L, Seenivasagan T, Iqbal ST, Agrawal OP, and Parashar BD. Behavioral and electrophysiological responses of Aedes albopictus to certain acids and alcohols present in human skin emanations. Parasitol Res. (2014) 113:3781–7. doi: 10.1007/s00436-014-4044-0
5. Chen Z, Liu F, and Liu N. Human odour coding in the yellow fever mosquito, aedes aEgypti. Sci Rep. (2019) 9:13336. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-49753-2
6. Bello JE and Carde RT. Compounds from human odor induce attraction and landing in female yellow fever mosquitoes (Aedes aEgypti). Sci Rep. (2022) 12:15638. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-19254-w
7. Zhang X, Crippen TL, Coates CJ, Wood TK, and Tomberlin JK. Effect of Quorum Sensing by Staphylococcus epidermidis on the Attraction Response of Female Adult Yellow Fever Mosquitoes, Aedes aEgypti aEgypti (Linnaeus) (Diptera: Culicidae), to a Blood-Feeding Source. PloS One. (2015) 10:e0143950. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143950
8. Boulanger N, Insonere JL, Van Blerk S, Barthel C, Serres C, Rais O, et al. Cross-alteration of murine skin and tick microbiome concomitant with pathogen transmission after Ixodes ricinus bite. Microbiome. (2023) 11:250. doi: 10.1186/s40168-023-01696-7
9. Nayani S, Meraj S, Renyard A, and Gries G. Blood-feeding stable flies, Stomoxys calcitrans (Diptera: Muscidae), are attracted to, and transmit Staphylococcus aureus (Bacillales: Staphylococcaceae), a causal agent of bovine mastitis: a laboratory pilot study. J Med entomology. (2024) 61:1470–7. doi: 10.1093/jme/tjae101
10. Lavoipierre MM. Feeding mechanism of blood-sucking arthropods. Nature. (1965) 208:302–3. doi: 10.1038/208302a0
11. Bergman D. Mouthparts and feeding mechanisms of haematophagous arthropods. In: Wikel S, editor. The immunology of host ectoparasitic arthropod relationships. CAB International, Wallingford, Oxfordshire (1996). p. 30–61.
12. Ribeiro JM. Role of saliva in blood-feeding by arthropods. Annu Rev entomology. (1987) 32:463–78. doi: 10.1146/annurev.en.32.010187.002335
13. Kaufman WR. Tick-host interaction: a synthesis of current concepts. Parasitol Today. (1989) 5:47–56. doi: 10.1016/0169-4758(89)90191-9
14. Suppan J, Engel B, Marchetti-Deschmann M, and Nurnberger S. Tick attachment cement - reviewing the mysteries of a biological skin plug system. Biol Rev Cambridge Philos Society. (2018) 93:1056–76. doi: 10.1111/brv.12384
15. Frischknecht F. The skin as interface in the transmission of arthropod-borne pathogens. Cell Microbiol. (2007) 9:1630–40. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2007.00955.x
16. Smith KV, DeLong KL, Griffith AP, Boyer CN, Martinez CC, Schexnayder SM, et al. Costs of horn fly (Diptera: muscidae) control for cow-calf producers in tennessee and texas, 2016. J Econ Entomol. (2022) 115:371–80. doi: 10.1093/jee/toab239
17. Sutherst RW and Tozer RS. Control of buffalo fly (Haematobia-irritans exigua de meijere) on dairy and beef-cattle using traps. Aust J Agr Res. (1995) 46:269–84. doi: 10.1071/AR9950269
18. Kuhnert P, Loosli N, Brodard I, Lindtke D, and Jores J. Resistance of zebu cattle (Bos indicus) to colonization by major ruminant hoof pathogens. Veterinary Microbiol. (2024) 296:110184. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2024.110184
19. Piper EK, Jonsson NN, Gondro C, Lew-Tabor AE, Moolhuijzen P, Vance ME, et al. Immunological profiles of Bos taurus and Bos indicus cattle infested with the cattle tick, Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus. Clin Vaccine immunology: CVI. (2009) 16:1074–86. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00157-09
20. Santos RI, Hermance ME, Reynolds ES, and Thangamani S. Salivary gland extract from the deer tick, Ixodes scapularis, facilitates neuroinvasion by Powassan virus in BALB/c mice. Sci Rep. (2021) 11:20873. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-00021-2
21. Ebel GD and Kramer LD. Short report: duration of tick attachment required for transmission of powassan virus by deer ticks. Am J Trop Med hygiene. (2004) 71:268–71. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2004.71.3.0700268
22. Bernard Q, Jaulhac B, and Boulanger N. Skin and arthropods: an effective interaction used by pathogens in vector-borne diseases. Eur J Dermatol. (2015) 25 Suppl 1:18–22.
23. Boulanger N and Wikel S. Induced transient immune tolerance in ticks and vertebrate host: A keystone of tick-borne diseases? Front Immunol. (2021) 12:625993. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.625993
24. Ribeiro JMC and Mans BJ. TickSialoFam (TSFam): A database that helps to classify tick salivary proteins, a review on tick salivary protein function and evolution, with considerations on the tick sialome switching phenomenon. Front Cell infection Microbiol. (2020) 10:374. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.00374
25. Chmelar J, Kotal J, Langhansova H, and Kotsyfakis M. Protease inhibitors in tick saliva: the role of serpins and cystatins in tick-host-pathogen interaction. Front Cell infection Microbiol. (2017) 7:216. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00216
26. Smyth P, Sasiwachirangkul J, Williams R, and Scott CJ. Cathepsin S (CTSS) activity in health and disease - A treasure trove of untapped clinical potential. Mol Aspects Med. (2022) 88:101106. doi: 10.1016/j.mam.2022.101106
27. Morris CJ. Carrageenan-induced paw edema in the rat and mouse. Methods Mol Biol. (2003) 225:115–21.
Keywords: vector-pathogen interactions, arthropod vector-skin interactions, arthropod saliva, host skin immunity, arthropod vector-host skin interface
Citation: Narasimhan S, Kazimirova M and Wikel S (2025) Editorial: Skin - confluence of vertebrate host defences, arthropod vectors, and vector-borne pathogens. Front. Immunol. 16:1688830. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1688830
Received: 19 August 2025; Accepted: 29 August 2025;
Published: 11 September 2025.
Edited and reviewed by:
Dario S. Zamboni, University of São Paulo, BrazilCopyright © 2025 Narasimhan, Kazimirova and Wikel. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Sukanya Narasimhan, c3VrYW55YS5uYXJhc2ltaGFuQHlhbGUuZWR1; Stephen Wikel, c3RlcGhlbi53aWtlbEBxdWlubmlwaWFjLmVkdQ==