Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Immunol.

Sec. Inflammation

This article is part of the Research TopicMolecular and cellular mechanisms underpinning adaptation and recovery after spinal cord injuryView all 4 articles

The impact of histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibition on neurobehavioural outcomes in preclinical models of traumatic and non-traumatic spinal cord injury: a systematic review

Provisionally accepted
  • 1School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
  • 2Department of Neurology, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, United States
  • 3Division of Academic Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Abstract Introduction Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a traumatic injury resulting in significant life-changing disability. Elucidating the molecular processes associated with SCI may help to design novel therapeutics targeted at improving patient outcomes. Current pharmacological candidates include histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors, whose anti-inflammatory properties are postulated to be of value in SCI. The objective was to synthesise the impact of HDAC inhibitors on neurobehavioural outcomes in preclinical studies of traumatic and non-traumatic SCI and to evaluate the suitability of HDAC inhibitors for clinical trials in patients with SCI. Methods The review was prospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023477882) and conducted following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. MEDLINE and Embase were searched. Studies of animal models of traumatic or non-traumatic SCI evaluating the effect of HDAC inhibition on neurobehavioural outcomes were eligible for inclusion. Risk of bias was assessed using the SYRCLE checklist. Screening, data-extraction and risk of bias assessments were completed in duplicate. Results Of 10,549 studies identified, 42 studies met inclusion criteria. Animal models were rats (n=28), mice (n=13) and rabbits (n=1). SCI models included spinal cord contusion (n=24), epidural compression (n=2), vascular clip compression (n=6), hemisection (n=5), ischaemia/reperfusion injury (n=4) and dorsolateral funiculus crush (n=1). Valproate was the most frequently studied HDAC inhibitor (n=20), followed by 4-phenylbutyrate (4-PBA; n=7) and RGFP966 (n=3). Trichostatin A, tubastatin A, entinostat, PCI-34051, scriptaid, CI-994, TMP269, vorinostat, 3-TYP, SW-100 and ACY1215 were each evaluated in a single study. Three studies used the sirtuin-1 (HDAC class III) inhibitor EX527 administered with an activator molecule: melatonin (n=1), MLN4924 (n=1) and oxymatrine (n=1). Locomotor function was assessed in 98% (41/42) of studies, with improvement in locomotor outcome reported in 73% (30/41). Pain and anxiety were evaluated in one study, in which significant improvement was demonstrated. Conclusion HDAC inhibitors are associated with functional motor recovery and improved anxiety and pain scores in preclinical models of SCI. However, the results should be interpreted with caution as risk of bias of included studies was unclear. These results support further investigation of HDAC inhibitors in preclinical studies before translation into clinical trials.

Keywords: spinal cord injury, Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors, Preclinical study, valproate, 4-PBA

Received: 27 Aug 2025; Accepted: 27 Oct 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Jagodzinska, Cole, Brannigan, Chintapalli, Davies, Kotter and Mowforth. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Oliver Mowforth, om283@cam.ac.uk

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.