MINI REVIEW article
Front. Immunol.
Sec. Cytokines and Soluble Mediators in Immunity
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1691988
This article is part of the Research TopicSystemic Sclerosis: Immunological ImpactsView all articles
The Clinical Utility of Autoantibodies in Systemic Sclerosis: A Review with a Focus on Cohort Differences and Standardization
Provisionally accepted- Department of Dermatology, Kanazawa Red Cross Hospital, Japanese Red Cross Society, Kanazawa, Japan
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is clinically heterogeneous. Disease-specific autoantibodies— anticentromere (ACA), anti–topoisomerase I (ATA/Scl-70), and anti–RNA polymerase III (RNAP III)—are central to classification and organ-risk prediction. Beyond prognosis, SSc-specific autoantibodies can support diagnosis as part of a composite assessment with nailfold capillaroscopy and clinical features; their contribution is reflected in the 2013 ACR/EULAR classification criteria and can be informative in very-early or sine presentations. More broadly, these immune signatures underpin routine SSc care and underscore the immunological impacts that shape disease expression. Methods: Narrative review (2000–August 2025) prioritizing studies in Japanese and Western cohorts, with emphasis on assay performance and cohort comparability. We appraise line immunoassay (LIA) performance vis-à-vis immunoprecipitation (IP), and integrate ICAP-compliant ANA interpretation. Results: ACA aligns with lower ILD risk but higher PAH and digital vasculopathy; ATA predicts ILD onset/progression; RNAP III marks rapid skin thickening, SRC risk, and temporally clustered malignancy; U1 RNP tracks overlap/MCTD-like features and PAH; U3 RNP indicates diffuse disease with vasculopathy; Th/To varies by center; PM-Scl and Ku flag overlap ILD/myositis. A clinical-first standardized workflow—ANA (ICAP) + core ELISAs (ACA, ATA, RNAP III, U1 RNP) followed by ANA-pattern–guided LIA/IP confirmation—supports both care and cross-cohort comparability. Conclusions: Autoantibodies form a practical foundation for SSc care across regions. Standardizing the reflex layer (LIA/IP) while leveraging established ANA and core ELISAs can reduce measurement-driven cohort differences and improve global synthesis of SSc evidence.
Keywords: systemic sclerosis, Autoantibodies, ACA, ATA/Scl-70, RNA Polymerase III, nucleolar antibodies, PM-Scl, Ku
Received: 25 Aug 2025; Accepted: 13 Oct 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Komura. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Kazuhiro Komura, komuraka@me.com
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.