- 1The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University, Weihui, Xinxiang, China
- 2Department of Bacteriology and Immunology, Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University/Beijing Tuberculosis and Thoracic Tumor Research Institute, Beijing, China
Background: Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) evades host immunity and maintains chronic infection, in part by reprogramming macrophage function. The chemokine MCP-1 and its receptor CCR2 play a key role in attracting monocytes and immunological modulation, but their exact involvement in MTB pathogenesis is unknown.
Methods: Using the H37Ra-infected mouse model, the expression of MTB virulence marker ESAT-6 and autophagy marker Beclin-1 was assessed. Transcriptome analysis was performed to identify CCR2-related gene expression changes and enriched pathways. In addition, the effects of CCR2 antagonists and MCP-1 knockdown on macrophage apoptosis, polarization, cytokine production, and immunosuppressive signaling were assessed using Quantitative real-time PCR, ELISA, flow cytometry, immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence, and western blot.
Results: CCR2 inhibition reduced ESAT-6 expression and restored Beclin-1 levels in lung tissue, alleviating inflammation and injury during late-stage infection. Transcriptomic profiling revealed that H37Ra infection activated CCR2-dependent genes involved in immune response and apoptosis, including Trim30, Fas, and PD-1, which were reversed by CCR2 antagonists. At the cellular level, H37Ra upregulated MCP-1 expression, promoting M2 polarization. MCP-1 Knockdown enhanced macrophage apoptosis, reversed M2 polarization, and suppressed immunosuppressive signaling. Additionally, MCP-1 knockdown increased TNF-α and IFN-γ levels, reduced TGF-β and IL-10 secretion, and oppositely regulated ESAT-6 and Beclin-1 expression.
Conclusion: The MCP-1/CCR2 axis promotes M2-type macrophage polarization, suppresses apoptosis, and enhances immunosuppressive signaling in the context of H37Ra infection. Targeting CCR2/MCP-1 may provide a promising strategy to reverse immune evasion and restore host defense mechanisms during MTB infection.
1 Introduction
Tuberculosis is a contagious lung disease attributed to infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) (1). Patients with active tuberculosis release MTB into the air through droplets generated by coughing, sneezing, and other actions, and healthy individuals may become infected after inhaling these bacteria-laden droplets (2). Although the host immune response is crucial for controlling M. tuberculosis infection, persistent or latent infection remains challenging due to the complex immune evasion mechanisms of MTB. Macrophages are highly plastic immune cells that can polarize into classically activated M1 or activated M2 phenotypes depending on environmental cues. M1 macrophages primarily mediate antimicrobial and pro-inflammatory responses, whereas M2 macrophages facilitate tissue repair and immunosuppression. Recent studies highlight the relevance of macrophage polarization across various diseases (3, 4). Acting as frontline immune cells, alveolar macrophages limit bacterial dissemination through phagocytosis and the secretion of antimicrobial and pro-inflammatory factors (5). However, MTB can induce macrophage polarization to the M2 type, suppressing inflammatory responses and weakening phagocytic and bactericidal functions, thus creating an immunosuppressive environment that promotes its survival (6). Additionally, Early Secreted Antigenic Target-6 (ESAT-6), a key virulence factor secreted by MTB, can disrupt host cell membranes, interfere with autophagy, induce apoptosis in immune cells, and increase M2-related cytokine expression, which worsens pulmonary immune imbalance (7, 8). Therefore, understanding how MTB regulates macrophage polarization and virulence factors like ESAT-6 to mediate immunosuppression is essential for understanding its persistence and developing new treatments.
Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1, also referred to as CCL2) and the chemokine receptor CCR2 are important mediators in the control of tissue homeostasis, inflammatory responses, and monocyte movement (9). CCR2 is mainly expressed on the surface of myeloid cells such as monocytes and macrophages, mediating their recruitment to inflammatory sites (10). MCP-1 is the main chemokine secreted by a variety of cells under infection or stimulation (11). Previous research has demonstrated that the CCR2/MCP-1 signaling axis plays a core immune regulatory function in a variety of pathological conditions. For example, a study (12) showed that MTB antigens such as PPD and ManLAM can selectively downregulate the expression of CCR2 in antigen-presenting cells without affecting CCR5 or CCR7, suggesting that CCR2 has a specific regulatory role in MTB-induced immune responses. ManLAM can also induce the production of MCP-1/CCL2, which may be related to IFN-γ signaling. This highlights the CCR2/MCP-1 axis’s regulating function in the immunological milieu of MTB infection. Similarly, in a mouse lung adenocarcinoma model, Ccr2/MCP-1 promotes the accumulation of myeloid suppressor cells (MDSCs), enhances local immunosuppression, as well as promotes tumor progression (13). Therefore, the Ccr2/MCP-1 signaling axis contributes to the remodeling of the disease microenvironment and immune escape by regulating immune cell migration and local inflammatory response.
Despite its known involvement in immune regulation, the specific function of the Ccr2/MCP-1 axis in MTB infection is yet to be fully elucidated. In order to explore the immunoregulatory role of the Ccr2/MCP-1 signaling axis in the process of MTB infection, the H37Ra chronic tuberculosis mouse model and in vitro macrophage infection system were established. The effects on bacterial virulence factors (ESAT-6), autophagy pathway (Beclin-1), macrophage polarization and apoptosis were evaluated in detail, aiming to reveal the potential mechanism of this pathway in regulating the immune microenvironment and maintaining immune escape in chronic MTB infection.
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Cell culture and transfection
RAW264.7 mouse macrophages were obtained from the Cell Bank of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai) and maintained in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS, 100 U/mL penicillin, and 100 µg/mL streptomycin at 37 °C under 5% CO2. For MCP-1 gene knockdown, cells were transfected with siMCP-1 or a negative control siRNA (si-NC) using Lipofectamine™ RNAiMAX (Invitrogen, USA), following the manufacturer’s protocol.
2.2 Animals
Thirty-two male C57BL/6 mice (6–8 weeks old) were obtained from Anhui Ketu Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Hefei, China) and housed under specific pathogen-free (SPF) conditions. Animal procedures were performed following the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (8th ed., 2011, NIH, USA) and conducted by Anhui Ketu Biotechnology. All protocols received ethical approval from the Animal Care and Use Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical College (approval no. dw-qn-2025-11).
2.3 H37Ra infection
The National Institutes for Food and Drug Control (Beijing, China) provided the attenuated MTB strain H37Ra. For in vivo experiments, mice were intranasally inoculated with a suspension of H37Ra (5 × 106 CFU in 50 μL PBS) to establish a chronic pulmonary infection model, and samples were collected at 3 or 28 days post-infection. For in vitro stimulation, RAW264.7 macrophages were cultured in antibiotic-free medium prior to infection. Cells were then exposed to H37Ra at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 10 and cultured for various durations (8 or 48 hours), depending on the experimental setup. The bacterial suspension was pre-treated with polymyxin B to eliminate endotoxin contamination before use.
2.4 CCR2 antagonist administration
The CCR2-specific antagonist RS504393 (Selleck Chemicals, USA) was used to pharmacologically inhibit CCR2 signaling. For animal studies, mice received daily intraperitoneal injections of RS504393 at a dose of 2 mg/kg from day 21 to day 28 post-H37Ra infection.
2.5 Immunohistochemistry
Formalin-fixed (FFPE) lung tissues were sectioned at 4 μm. After deparaffinization/rehydration and antigen retrieval (15 min boiling in 10 mM citrate buffer, pH 6.0), endogenous peroxidase was blocked (3% H2O2, 10 min, RT). Sections were blocked with 5% BSA (30 min), then incubated overnight at 4 °C with primary antibodies: ESAT-6 (1:100, ab45073) and Beclin-1 (1:100, ab210498). After HRP-conjugated secondary antibody incubation (1:2000, ab205718, 30 min, RT), DAB detection and hematoxylin counterstaining were performed. Slides were imaged using a bright-field microscope (Leica DM5000, 200×), with positive cells quantified using ImageJ (version 1.53, NIH).
2.6 Quantitative real-time PCR
Total RNA was isolated from lung tissues and cultured macrophages with TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen). RNA purity/concentration was assessed using a NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). cDNA synthesis from 1 µg RNA employed the PrimeScript RT Reagent Kit (Takara, Japan) per the manufacturer’s protocol. qPCR was performed using SYBR Green Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, USA) on a QuantStudio 6 Flex Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems). The relative mRNA expression levels were calculated using the 2-ΔΔCt method, with GAPDH serving as the internal control. The primer sequences used for qPCR are listed in Table 1.
2.7 Hematoxylin and eosin staining
Harvested lung tissues underwent 24 h fixation in 10% neutral-buffered formalin, paraffin embedding, and 4 μm sectioning (Leica DM5000). Deparaffinized and rehydrated sections were H&E-stained: hematoxylin (5 min), eosin (2 min). Slides were dehydrated, mounted with neutral resin, and observed under a light microscope. Histopathological evaluation was performed to assess inflammatory cell infiltration and structural damage in the lung tissue.
2.8 Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
ELISA kits (Beyotime) measured mouse TNF-α (#PT512), IFN-γ (#PI508), TGF-β1 (#PT878), and IL-10 (#PI522) levels in mouse serum and macrophage supernatants. A Thermo Fisher microplate reader detected absorbance (450 nm), and cytokine levels were calculated based on the standard curves provided with each kit.
2.9 Western blot assay
Proteins were extracted from lung tissue and macrophages using RIPA buffer (Beyotime; protease inhibitors added). After BCA quantification (Beyotime kit), equivalent protein was resolved by SDS-PAGE and transferred to PVDF membranes (Millipore). Blocking was performed in 5% non-fat milk/TBST (1 h, RT). Membranes were then probed overnight at 4 °C with primary antibodies against TRIM30 (1:1000 dilution, ab76953, Abcam), PD-1 (1:1000 dilution, ab214421, Abcam), MCP-1 (1:1000 dilution, ab315478, Abcam), CD206 (1:1000 dilution, ab64693, Abcam), CD163 (1:1000 dilution, ab18242, Abcam), ARG1 (1:5000 dilution, Cat No. 16001-1-AP, Proteintech), CD86 (1:2000 dilution, Cat No. 83213-5-RR, Proteintech), Beclin-1 (1:1000 dilution, ab210498, Abcam), ESAT-6 (1:2000 dilution, ab45073, Abcam), and GAPDH (1:5000 dilution, ab8245, Abcam), followed by HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies (goat anti-rabbit or goat anti-mouse IgG, Abcam). An enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) detection kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) was used to view the bands, and ImageJ software (NIH, version 1.53) was used to quantify them.
2.10 Macrophage polarization analysis
To assess macrophage polarization, flow cytometry and immunofluorescence staining were performed to evaluate the expression of M2 surface markers CD163 and CD206. Briefly, cells were harvested and incubated with anti-F4/80 (BioLegend, Cat#123110, USA), anti-CD206-PE (BioLegend, Cat#141706, USA), and anti-CD163-APC (BioLegend, Cat#155310, USA) antibodies for 30 minutes at 4 °C in the dark. The samples were examined using a BD FACSCanto™ II flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, USA) following two PBS washes. Software called FlowJo (FlowJo, LLC) was used to process the data.
For immunofluorescence, macrophages on coverslips were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 minutes, permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100, and blocked with 5% BSA for 1 hour (RT). Cells were incubated overnight at 4 °C with primary antibodies against CD206 (Abcam, ab64693) or CD163 (Abcam, ab182422), followed by incubation with Alexa Fluor® 594/488 secondary antibodies (Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 1 hour at RT. Nuclei were stained with DAPI. Images were captured using a Nikon Eclipse Ti fluorescence microscope and analyzed with ImageJ software (NIH, version 1.53).
2.11 Flow cytometric analysis of apoptosis
Apoptosis of macrophages was evaluated using Annexin V-FITC/propidium iodide (PI) double staining. Cells were harvested at the indicated time points and washed twice with cold PBS, followed by resuspension in 100 μL of 1× binding buffer. For 15 minutes at room temperature in the dark, cell suspensions were stained with 5 μL of Annexin V-FITC and 5 μL of PI (BD Biosciences Annexin V-FITC/PI Apoptosis Detection Kit). 400 μL of 1× binding buffer was added after incubation, and samples were examined right away using a BD FACSCanto II flow cytometer (BD Biosciences). To analyze the data, FlowJo software (FlowJo LLC) was used.
2.12 RNA sequencing and bioinformatics analysis
TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen) was used to extract total RNA from mouse lung tissue. Thermo Scientific’s NanoDrop 2000 and Agilent Technologies’ Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer were used to confirm the integrity of the RNA. Shanghai Majorbio Bio-pharm Technology was responsible for the Illumina NovaSeq 6000 sequencing. Clean reads were aligned to the GRCm39 mouse genome using HISAT2 after adapter and quality trimming, and then StringTie was used to quantify gene expression. DESeq2 applied criteria of |log2Fold Change| > 1 and adjusted P < 0.05 to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs). GO and KEGG enrichment analyses were performed using the clusterProfiler R package to investigate biological processes and pathways associated with CCR2 signaling.
2.13 Statistical analysis
The mean ± standard deviation (SD) is used to display all data. Unpaired Student’s t-test or one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test, if applicable, were used to assess statistical significance. Statistical significance was defined as a P-value of less than 0.05. GraphPad Prism 9.0 (GraphPad Software, USA) and R software (version 4.3.1) were used to create graphs and conduct statistical analyses for data visualization and analysis relevant to bioinformatics.
3 Results
3.1 CCR2 inhibition downregulates ESAT-6 expression and increases Beclin-1 levels in lung tissues of H37Ra-infected mice
Studies have shown that CCR2 plays a key role in MTB infection, mainly involving monocyte recruitment, immune regulation, and disease pathogenesis (14, 15). In this study, we evaluated the expression of MTB virulence marker ESAT-6 and autophagy marker Beclin-1 in the lung tissues of mice infected with H37Ra. IHC staining indicated that the percentage of ESAT-6-positive cells increased significantly by day 3 after infection and gradually decreased by day 28. Notably, administering CCR2 antagonists on day 28 further reduced ESAT-6 expression compared with mice infected with H37Ra for 28 days. In contrast, Beclin-1 expression was significantly upregulated on day 3 but decreased by day 28 after CCR2 antagonist, with partial recovery following the administration of the CCR2 antagonist (Figure 1A, C). qPCR analysis consistently confirmed that ESAT-6 mRNA levels peaked on day 3 and declined by day 28, while Beclin-1 mRNA levels showed a similar pattern (Figure 1D, E). Notably, CCR2 antagonist treatment resulted in a significant decrease in ESAT-6 mRNA levels and an increase in Beclin-1 mRNA levels compared to the H37Ra-28d control group. These results suggest that CCR2 signaling may modulate the host environment in a manner that influences mycobacterial virulence markers.
Figure 1. Expression levels of the virulence marker ESAT-6 and the autophagy marker Beclin-1 in lung tissues of H37Ra-infected mice. (A) Representative IHC staining of ESAT-6 and Beclin-1 in lung sections of mice in the control, H37Ra-3d, H37Ra-28d, and H37Ra-28d+CCR2 antagonist groups. Scale bar = 100 μm. (B, C) Quantitative analysis of ESAT-6-positive (B) and Beclin-1-positive (C) cells based on IHC analysis. (D, E) qPCR analysis of ESAT-6 (D) and Beclin-1 (E) mRNA levels in lung sections of mice in the control, H37Ra-3d, H37Ra-28d, and H37Ra-28d+CCR2 antagonist groups. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001. IHC, Immunohistochemistry; qPCR, Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction; d, day; CCR2, C-C motif chemokine receptor 2; ESAT-6, Early Secreted Antigenic Target 6; Beclin-1, Beclin-1.
3.2 CCR2 inhibition restores lung inflammation and reduces lung tissue damage in H37Ra-infected mice
To explore the effects of CCR2 signaling on inflammatory responses and lung pathology in mice infected with H37Ra, we quantified serum TNF-α and IFN-γ and examined lung histopathology. As shown in Figures 2A, B, H37Ra infection significantly increased the production of serum TNF-α and IFN-γ on day 3, which gradually decreased on day 28. However, the addition of CCR2 antagonists on day 28 partially restored the levels of TNF-α and IFN-γ caused by H37Ra infection, suggesting that immunosuppression was reversed. Histological analysis of H&E staining showed severe inflammatory cell infiltration and alveolar structural destruction in the H37Ra-28d group (Figure 2C). However, CCR2 blockade significantly alleviated these pathological changes. These results suggest that the CCR2 antagonist may assist in restoring immune activity, alleviating excessive inflammation, and improving lung tissue lesions in the late stage of infection.
Figure 2. CCR2 inhibition restores proinflammatory cytokine levels and reduces lung tissue damage in H37Ra-infected mice. (A, B) ELISA quantification of serum TNF-α (A) and IFN-γ (B) in lung homogenates of the control, H37Ra-3d, H37Ra-28d, and H37Ra-28d+CCR2 antagonist groups. (C) Representative lung tissue sections stained with H&E to show histopathological changes. Scale bar = 50 μm. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001. ELISA, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay; TNF-α, Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha; IFN-γ, Interferon-gamma; H&E, Hematoxylin and Eosin; d, day; CCR2, C-C motif chemokine receptor 2.
3.3 Transcriptomic profiling reveals CCR2-associated transcriptional alterations and pathway enrichment in H37Ra-induced pulmonary tuberculosis model
To investigate transcriptomic changes associated with H37Ra-induced lung responses and the effects of CCR2 antagonists, we performed RNA sequencing and differential gene expression analysis. The volcano plot showed that 1,472 genes were upregulated and 817 genes were downregulated in the blank and H37Ra-28d groups (Figure 3A); 1,214 genes were upregulated and 1,864 genes were downregulated in the H37Ra-28d and H37Ra-28d+CCR2 antagonist groups (Figure 3B). Among them, Trim30a, Fas, PD-1, and Ccr2 were significantly upregulated in H37Ra-28d lung tissues, but downregulated after CCR2 antagonist, suggesting that they are CCR2-dependent. GO enrichment analysis indicated that DEGs in the H37Ra-28d group were significantly enriched in biological processes such as “positive regulation of apoptotic process,” “positive regulation of cell migration,” and “response to bacterium” (Figure 4A) In contrast, the CCR2 antagonist group showed prominent enrichment in cell cycle-related terms such as “chromosome segregation” and “DNA repair” (Figure 4D). KEGG pathway analysis further supported these findings, highlighting activation of immune-inflammatory signaling in the H37Ra-28d group, such as TNF, MAPK, and VEGF signaling pathways (Figure 4C). However, CCR2 antagonist resulted in enrichment of cell cycle-related and metabolic pathways, including “DNA replication,” “glutathione metabolism,” and “cell cycle,” indicating a shift in cellular processes from inflammation to proliferation (Figure 4D).
Figure 3. Transcriptomic alterations in lung tissues upon H37Ra infection and CCR2 inhibition. (A, B) Volcano plots showing differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between Blank and H37Ra-28d groups (A), and between H37Ra-28d and H37Ra-28d+CCR2 antagonist groups (B). Red and blue dots indicate significantly upregulated and downregulated genes, respectively. Genes of interest (Trim30a, Fas, PD-1, Ccr2) are labeled. DEGs, Differentially expressed genes; Ccr2, C-C motif chemokine receptor 2; d, day; Trim30a, Tripartite motif-containing 30A; Fas, Fas cell surface death receptor; PD-1, Programmed cell death protein 1.
Figure 4. GO and KEGG enrichment analyses of DEGs. (A, B) GO enrichment scatter plots of DEGs between Blank vs H37Ra-28d (A) and H37Ra-28d vs H37Ra-28d+CCR2 antagonist groups (B). Each dot represents a GO term; dot size and color indicate gene count and adjusted P-value, respectively. (C) KEGG enrichment of DEGs between the Blank and H37Ra-28d groups. Enriched pathways are classified into four categories: Environmental Information Processing, Cellular Processes, Organismal Systems, and Human Diseases. (D) KEGG enrichment of DEGs between the H37Ra-28d and H37Ra-28d+CCR2 antagonist groups. Enriched pathways are classified into six categories: Metabolism, Genetic Information Processing, Environmental Information Processing, Cellular Processes, Organismal Systems, and Human Diseases. GO, Gene Ontology; KEGG, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes; DEGs, Differentially expressed genes; CCR2, C-C motif chemokine receptor 2; d, day.
3.4 MCP-1/CCR2 axis mediates apoptosis of macrophages stimulated by H37Ra
To explore the regulatory role of the MCP-1/Ccr2 axis in H37Ra-induced responses, we examined in vivo MCP-1 expression in the mouse model. qPCR of mouse lungs showed that H37Ra infection increased MCP-1 mRNA at 3 days and peaked at 28 days, whereas treatment with the CCR2 antagonist RS504393 markedly reduced MCP-1 levels (Figure 5A). To further elucidate the functional impact of MCP-1, we performed Annexin V/PI staining to evaluate the apoptosis level of macrophages after H37Ra exposure. As shown in Figure 5B, the number of early (Q3) and late (Q2) apoptotic cells increased in a time-dependent manner after 8 and 48 hours of H37Ra stimulation. Notably, knockdown of the MCP-1 gene using siRNA reduced apoptosis after 48 hours of stimulation, attenuating the number of early apoptotic cells from 22.3% to 13.5%. These results suggest that MCP-1 knockdown may play a protective anti-apoptotic role in macrophages through Ccr2-mediated signaling.
Figure 5. MCP-1 expression and apoptosis analysis of RAW264.7 macrophages after H37Ra stimulation. (A) qPCR detection of MCP-1 mRNA levels at days 3, 28, and 28 days plus CCR2 antagonist after H37Ra infection in vivo. (B) Flow cytometry analysis of macrophage apoptosis using Annexin V-FITC and PE-PI staining after H37Ra stimulation for 8 h or 48 h, or 48 h with MCP-1 siRNA transfection. Q3 (Annexin V+/PI-) indicates early apoptosis; Q2 (Annexin V+/PI+) indicates late apoptosis. **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001. CCR2, C-C motif chemokine receptor 2; MCP-1, C-C motif chemokine ligand 2.
3.5 MCP-1 promotes H37Ra-induced M2 macrophage polarization
Studies have found that MTB can promote its survival and chronic infection by inducing macrophages to polarize toward M2 type and inhibiting their bactericidal function (16, 17). To explore the effect of MCP-1 on H37Ra-induced macrophage polarization, we first evaluated the expression of the M2 marker CD163. Flow cytometry analysis showed that after H37Ra stimulation, CD163+F4/80+ macrophages gradually increased, especially at 48 hours, while siRNA-mediated MCP-1 knockdown significantly reduced the proportion of CD163+ cells (Figure 6A). Immunofluorescence staining results consistently confirmed that H37Ra stimulation enhanced the expression of CD163, while MCP-1 knockdown significantly inhibited the signal intensity of CD163 (Figure 6B). Similarly, analysis of another M2 marker, CD206, showed a similar trend. H37Ra stimulation induced a time-dependent increase in the number of CD206 macrophages, while MCP-1 knockdown strongly inhibited this increase (Figure 7A). Immunofluorescence staining further verified the increase in CD206 expression after H37Ra stimulation and the decrease in CD206 expression after MCP-1 knockdown (Figure 7B). These findings suggest that MCP-1 is involved in H37Ra-induced M2 macrophage polarization.
Figure 6. Flow cytometry and immunofluorescence analysis of CD163 expression in macrophages. (A) Representative flow cytometry plots showing the proportion of CD163+F4/80+ cells in control, H37Ra-8h, H37Ra-48h, and H37Ra-48h+siMCP-1 groups. (B) Immunofluorescence staining for CD163 (green) and DAPI (blue) in macrophages under the indicated treatments. Scale bar = 100 μm. MCP-1, C-C motif chemokine ligand 2; CD163, Cluster of Differentiation 163.
Figure 7. Flow cytometry and immunofluorescence analysis of CD206 expression in macrophages. (A) Flow cytometry plots showing the percentage of CD206+F4/80+ cells in control, H37Ra-8h, H37Ra-48h, and H37Ra-48h+siMCP-1 groups. (B) Immunofluorescence images of CD206 (red) and DAPI (blue) staining in macrophages across different treatment conditions. Scale bar = 100 μm. MCP-1, C-C motif chemokine ligand 2; CD206, Mannose receptor C-type 1.
3.6 MCP-1 regulates the levels of inflammatory cytokines and ESAT-6/autophagy-related proteins in macrophages
We then analyzed the role of MCP-1 in regulating the expression of inflammatory cytokines and ESAT-6/autophagy-related markers. In ELISA experiments, H37Ra stimulation for 48h significantly upregulated the levels of TNF-α, TGF-β, IL-10, and IFN-γ in the supernatant of RAW264.7 macrophages compared with the control group (Figures 8A, D). Knockdown of MCP-1 further enhanced the production of TNF-α and IFN-γ, while significantly reducing the levels of TGF-β and IL-10. Western blot analysis showed that H37Ra treatment for 48h significantly increased the protein levels of ESAT-6 and Beclin-1 (Figures 8E, F). Knockdown of MCP-1 significantly reduced the expression of ESAT-6, but further promoted the upregulation of Beclin-1. These results suggest that MCP-1 may regulate the secretion of inflammatory cytokines and play opposite roles in regulating the virulence factor ESAT-6 and the autophagy-related protein Beclin-1 in H37Ra-stimulated macrophages.
Figure 8. MCP-1 regulates the levels of inflammatory cytokines and ESAT-6/autophagy-related proteins in macrophages. (A-D) ELISA analysis of TNF-α (A), TGF-β (B), IL-10 (C), and IFN-γ (F) in the supernatants of RAW264.7 macrophages treated with control, H37Ra-48h, or H37Ra-48h+siMCP-1. (E-F) Western blot and densitometry analysis of ESAT-6 (E) and Beclin-1 (F) protein levels in different treatment groups; GAPDH was used as a loading control. **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001. MCP-1, C-C motif chemokine ligand 2; ELISA, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay; MTB, Mycobacterium tuberculosis; TNF-α, Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha; TGF-β, Transforming Growth Factor-beta; IL-10, Interleukin-10; IFN-γ, Interferon-gamma; ESAT-6, Early Secreted Antigenic Target 6; Beclin-1, Beclin-1.
3.7 MCP-1 promotes M2 polarization and immunosuppressive signaling in H37Ra-treated macrophages
Further experiments investigated the role of MCP-1 in regulating macrophage polarization and immunosuppressive markers. Flow cytometry results showed that compared with the control group, H37Ra treatment for 48h significantly increased the number of early and late apoptotic macrophages, while MCP-1 knockdown reduced the proportion of apoptotic cells (Figure 9A). Western blot analysis further showed that H37Ra treatment for 48h upregulated the expression of M2 markers CD206, CD163, and ARG1, while the expression of CD206 and CD163 decreased significantly after MCP-1 knockdown, but the inhibitory effect of ARG1 was relatively weak (Figures 9B, C, D, F, G, H). In contrast, the expression of M1 marker CD86 was downregulated after H37Ra treatment for 48h and slightly restored after MCP-1 knockdown, although the difference was not significant (Figures 9E, I). qPCR analysis results showed that H37Ra stimulation for 48h significantly increased the mRNA levels of Trim30, Fas, PD-1, and MCP-1, while MCP-1 knockdown significantly reduced the expression levels of these molecules (Figures 10A-D). Western blot further confirmed the protein expression patterns of TRIM30, PD-1, as well as MCP-1, which were consistent with the transcriptome data (Figures 10E-J). These data suggest that MCP-1 may be involved in H37Ra-induced M2 polarization, anti-inflammatory state, and immunosuppressive signaling.
Figure 9. MCP-1 knockdown modulates M1/M2 macrophage polarization markers and apoptosis. (A) Apoptosis of macrophages under control, H37Ra-48h, and H37Ra-48h+siMCP-1 conditions was analyzed by flow cytometry using Annexin V/PI staining. (B-E) Representative Western blot images showing protein expression of CD206 (B), CD163 (C), ARG1(D) (M2 marker), and CD86 (E) (M1 marker). (F-I) Quantitative analysis of CD206 (F), CD163 (G), ARG1 (H), and CD86 (I) protein levels (normalized to GAPDH). **P < 0.01, ****P < 0.0001. MCP-1, C-C motif chemokine ligand 2; CD206, C-type lectin domain family 13 member D; CD163, Cluster of Differentiation 163; ARG1, Arginase 1; CD86, Cluster of Differentiation 86.
Figure 10. MCP-1 regulates immunosuppressive gene expression in macrophages. (A-D) Quantitative real-time PCR analysis of mRNA levels of Trim30 (A), Fas (B), PD-1 (C), and MCP-1 (D) in control, H37Ra-48h, and H37Ra-48h+siMCP-1 macrophages. (E-G) Western blot analysis of TRIM30 (E), PD-1 (F), and MCP-1 (G) protein expression, with GAPDH as a loading control. (H-J) Quantification of protein band intensities corresponding to TRIM30 (H), PD-1 (I), and MCP-1 (J), respectively. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001. MCP-1, C-C motif chemokine ligand 2; Trim30, Tripartite motif-containing 30A; Fas, Fas cell surface death receptor; PD-1, Programmed cell death protein 1.
4 Discussion
Using a mouse model of pulmonary tuberculosis caused by the attenuated strain H37Ra, we methodically examined the function of the MCP-1/Ccr2 signaling axis in immunoregulation during MTB infection. Our findings imply that, via modifying mycobacterial pathogenicity, autophagy, inflammatory responses, and macrophage function, Ccr2 signaling is essential for controlling host-pathogen interactions. Specifically, inhibition of CCR2 significantly reduced the expression of the MTB virulence factor ESAT-6, while restoring the level of the autophagy marker Beclin-1 and attenuating lung tissue damage. Transcriptome analysis revealed a Ccr2-dependent immunosuppressive gene signature, including TRIM30A, PD-1, and FAS, which was reversed after CCR2 blockade. Furthermore, MCP-1 mediated macrophage anti-apoptosis and promoted M2 polarization, while upregulating immunosuppressive markers such as CD206, CD163, and ARG1. Together, these results suggest that MCP-1/Ccr2 signaling contributes to persistent infection by orchestrating a suppressive immune microenvironment and modulating the host environment in a manner that influences mycobacterial virulence markers.
ESAT-6 is a key virulence factor of MTB, which can promote bacterial escape to the cytoplasm by disrupting the host cell membrane. It directly binds to and inhibits the autophagic protein, blocking autophagosome formation, thereby helping bacteria evade host autophagic clearance (18). At the same time, inhibition of Beclin-1 function disrupts cellular homeostasis and exacerbates inflammatory damage at the site of infection (19). This interference mechanism targeting autophagy is an important strategy for MTB to achieve immune escape and intracellular survival. In the lungs of mice infected with H37Ra, we found that suppressing CCR2 significantly decreased ESAT-6 expression while restoring Beclin-1 levels. These findings suggest that MCP-1/Ccr2 signaling facilitates mycobacterial persistence by enhancing virulence (reflected by increased ESAT-6) and suppressing autophagy (via reduced Beclin-1). In parallel, MCP-1/Ccr2 promotes macrophage polarization toward an M2 phenotype, which is generally associated with diminished bactericidal activity. TNF-α and IFN-γ are key inflammatory factors for the host to resist MTB infection (20), of which TNF-α regulates granuloma formation, bacterial dissemination, and tissue clearance (21), whereas IFN-γ boosts bactericidal activity by activating macrophages (22). Our study found that H37Ra infection decreased lung tissue’s production of TNF-α and IFN-γ after 28 days, while CCR2 antagonists could significantly restore their expression levels, suggesting that Ccr2 may be involved in regulating the establishment of an immunosuppressive state during chronic infection. This result further suggests that blocking Ccr2 signals can help enhance the host’s immune response and reduce lung inflammatory damage.
Transcriptome analysis further confirmed the immunomodulatory role of CCR2 signaling in chronic MTB infection. CCR2 blockade reversed the upregulation of immunosuppressive and pro-apoptotic genes (TRIM30, FAS, PD-1, and CCR2), indicating that these genes are dependent on CCR2 signaling. Among them, TRIM30, as an E3 ubiquitin ligase, can negatively regulate the NLRP3 inflammasome pathway and inhibit excessive inflammatory responses (23); FAS participates in the apoptotic clearance of infected cells, which helps to limit the continued survival of pathogens in the host (24). Notably, PD-1 is crucial for preserving immunological homeostasis and avoiding over-activation of the immune system (25, 26). The literature (27) reports that PD-1-deficient patients inactivate PD-1 signals in leukocytes, resulting in reduced IFN-γ secretion and dysfunction of T cell subsets, thereby increasing susceptibility to MTB infection. In addition, the literature also pointed out that PD-1 dysregulation can trigger excessive activation of STAT3-related pathways, further promoting immune abnormalities and autoimmune pulmonary lesions. Our GO enrichment analysis showed that chronic infection was associated with activation of pathways related to inflammation, cell migration, and apoptosis, Our GO enrichment analysis revealed that persistent infection activated pathways linked to inflammation, cell migration, and death, whereas CCR2 inhibition redirected gene expression toward cell cycle regulation as well as DNA repair. In addition, KEGG analysis showed that CCR2 signaling promoted proinflammatory pathways (e.g., TNF, MAPK, VEGF), while CCR2 inhibition enhanced pathways related to metabolism and proliferation, including glutathione metabolism and DNA replication. These findings suggest that CCR2 signaling may maintain chronic inflammatory responses and immune dysregulation, while its inhibition promotes the transition from immune activation to cellular recovery and homeostasis.
According to some recent research, M2 macrophages are crucial for immunoregulatory processes in MTB infection, which may help the virus survive and evade the immune system (28–30). A study on patients with smoking-related pulmonary tuberculosis discovered that the proportion of M2 macrophages in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of pulmonary tuberculosis-smokers was significantly increased, accompanied by upregulation of inflammatory factors such as MMP9 and MMP12. This suggests that MTB infection may enhance M2 polarization and promote immunosuppression in the context of smoking-related chronic inflammation (31). Additionally, MTB heat shock protein Hsp16.3 has been shown to induce macrophages to express M2 markers such as Arg-1, IL-10, and CD206, and its mechanism depends on CCRL2 and CX3CR1 receptors, activating the AKT/ERK/p38-MAPK signaling pathway (32). Another study has shown that Rocaglates, which are immunomodulators, can enhance macrophages’ response to IFN-γ and inhibit IL-4-induced M2 polarization, thereby promoting an M1-like phenotype and antibacterial ability. This suggests that reversing M2 polarization may be a key strategy for resisting chronic infection (33). Another study, from the perspective of the GRN/TNFR2 pathway, found that GRN can upregulate TNFR2 expression and drive M2 polarization. After knocking out GRN, M1-related factors were upregulated, while M2 markers decreased, further confirming the key role of this axis in MTB-induced immunosuppression (17).
Studies have shown that MCP-1 plays a key role in promoting macrophage polarization to the M2 phenotype. A study on hepatocellular carcinoma found that SLFN11 deficiency can enhance the infiltration of immunosuppressive macrophages and promote their transformation to the M2-like phenotype by activating the Ccl2 signaling pathway, thereby exacerbating tumor progression (34). Another study also showed that nanofiber materials that continuously release MCP-1 can induce macrophage polarization to the M2 type, which not only reduces foreign body reactions but also promotes angiogenesis (35). These studies together emphasize the core role of MCP-1 in regulating the immunosuppressive microenvironment, especially in inducing M2 polarization. Consistent with these findings, our study further examined the regulatory function of MCP-1 in M2 macrophage polarization and immune suppression during MTB infection. This study further revealed the multiple mechanisms by which MCP-1 regulates macrophage function in MTB infection. H37Ra stimulation significantly induced an increase in the proportion of CD206+ and CD163+ M2 macrophages, accompanied by upregulation of the expression of immunosuppressive factors ARG1 and PD-1. In contrast, MCP-1 knockdown effectively inhibited the expression of M2 marker molecules and slightly restored the level of M1 marker CD86. Besides, flow cytometry showed that MCP-1 downregulation significantly enhanced the level of apoptosis induced by H37Ra. Analysis of inflammatory factors showed that MCP-1 downregulation promoted the release of TNF-α or IFN-γ and inhibited the secretion of TGF-β with IL-10, indicating that it maintained a balance between immunosuppression and pro-inflammatory responses. It is worth noting that MCP-1 also synergistically upregulated the expression of PD-1, TRIM30, and FAS immune regulatory factors, suggesting that it is involved in apoptosis, inflammatory regulation, and immune escape through the CCR2 pathway. In summary, MCP-1 is not only a key factor in the polarization of M2 macrophages induced by H37Ra but also plays a central role in regulating its anti-apoptotic and immunosuppressive functions.
This study has several limitations. Additional autophagy markers (e.g., LC3, p62) and host autophagy gene analyses were not performed, and MCP-1 effects were mainly studied in RAW264.7 cells without in vivo validation. The use of the attenuated H37Ra strain may limit generalizability to virulent Mtb infection, and the mechanistic link between autophagy modulation and M2 macrophage polarization remains to be established. Furthermore, a detailed characterization of H37Ra, including ESX system integrity and ESAT-6 production, was not conducted. These limitations highlight areas for further investigation in future studies to strengthen and extend the current findings.
5 Conclusion
This study revealed the multiple immune regulatory effects of the CCR2/MCP-1 signaling axis in chronic MTB infection. CCR2 antagonists can significantly reduce the expression of bacterial virulence factor ESAT-6, restore Beclin-1-mediated autophagy levels, reduce inflammatory damage in lung tissue, and improve tissue structure. Transcriptome analysis revealed CCR2-related immunosuppressive genes, including TRIM30A, FAS, and PD-1. Mechanistically, MCP-1 promoted macrophage anti-apoptosis and induced M2 polarization, accompanied by upregulation of immunosuppressive cytokines (IL-10, TGF-β) and markers (CD206, CD163, ARG1). Moreover, knockdown of MCP-1 reversed these effects and enhanced proinflammatory responses and autophagy. Together, these results collectively imply that the CCR2/MCP-1 axis is involved in key immunoregulatory pathways in chronic MTB infection and might be a target for regulating the immune microenvironment of tuberculosis infection.
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.
Ethics statement
The animal study was approved by Animal Care and Use Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical College (approval no. dw-qn-2025-11). The study was conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements.
Author contributions
GZ: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. CG: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft. XL: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. LT: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft. XC: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. FT: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft. LZ: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft. XW: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft. JC: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declared financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This study is funded by Key Technology Research and Development Project of Henan Provincial Department of Science and Technology (No. 242102310078 [Guizeng Zhao], 242102310202 [Junwei Cui]); Henan Provincial Medical Science and Technology Key Research and Development Program(No. LHGJ20230525 [Junwei Cui], LHGJ20240471 [Xia Wang]); Henan Provincial Tuberculosis Control Capacity Enhancement Initiative (Yu Cai She [2023] No. 68. Supported by the Department of Finance of Henan Province & Health Commission of Henan Province [Junwei Cui]); Open Research Project of the Institute of Tuberculosis, Xinxiang Medical University (No. XYJHB202101 [Junwei Cui], XYJHB202107 [Guizeng Zhao]).
Conflict of interest
The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declare that Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript. During the preparation of this work the authors used ChatGpt-3.5 in order to check spell and grammar. After using this tool, the authors reviewed and edited the content as needed and takes full responsibility for the content of the publication.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1. Ong CWM, Migliori GB, Raviglione M, MacGregor-Skinner G, Sotgiu G, Alffenaar J-W, et al. Epidemic and pandemic viral infections: impact on tuberculosis and the lung: A consensus by the World Association for Infectious Diseases and Immunological Disorders (WAidid), Global Tuberculosis Network (GTN), and members of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Study Group for Mycobacterial Infections (ESGMYC). Eur Respir J. (2020) 56. doi: 10.1183/13993003.01727-2020
2. Njelita IA, Nwachukwu CC, Eyisi IG, Ezenyeaku CA, and Okeke HN. Prevalence and risk factors of active tuberculosis disease in contacts of tuberculosis cases treated in a teaching hospital in southeast Nigeria: a cross-sectional study. Int J Healthcare Sci. (2025) 13:80–9. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.15319060
3. Anand N, Peh KH, and Kolesar JM. Macrophage repolarization as a therapeutic strategy for osteosarcoma. Int J Mol Sci. (2023) 24. doi: 10.3390/ijms24032858
4. Schweer D, Anand N, Anderson A, McCorkle JR, Neupane K, Nail AN, et al. Human macrophage-engineered vesicles for utilization in ovarian cancer treatment. Front Oncol. (2022) 12:1042730. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1042730
5. Sweet MJ, Ramnath D, Singhal A, and Kapetanovic R. Inducible antibacterial responses in macrophages. Nat Rev Immunol. (2025) 25:92–107. doi: 10.1038/s41577-024-01080-y
6. Cerdeira CD and Brigagão MR. Targeting macrophage polarization in infectious diseases: M1/M2 functional profiles, immune signaling and microbial virulence factors. Immunol Investigations. (2024) 53:1030–91. doi: 10.1080/08820139.2024.2367682
7. Anes E, Pires D, Mandal M, and Azevedo-Pereira JM. ESAT-6 a major virulence factor of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Biomolecules. (2023) 13:968. doi: 10.3390/biom13060968
8. Lim Y-J, Yi M-H, Choi J-A, Lee J, Han J-Y, Jo S-H, et al. Roles of endoplasmic reticulum stress-mediated apoptosis in M1-polarized macrophages during mycobacterial infections. Sci Rep. (2016) 6:37211. doi: 10.1038/srep37211
9. Zhu S, Liu M, Bennett S, Wang Z, Pfleger KD, and Xu J. The molecular structure and role of CCL2 (MCP-1) and C-C chemokine receptor CCR2 in skeletal biology and diseases. J Cell Physiol. (2021) 236:7211–22. doi: 10.1002/jcp.30375
10. Fei L, Ren X, Yu H, and Zhan Y. Targeting the CCL2/CCR2 axis in cancer immunotherapy: one stone, three birds? Front Immunol. (2021) 12:771210. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.771210
11. Lee J, Choi JA, H-h Ju, Kim J-E, Paik S-Y, and Rao PV. Role of MCP-1 and IL-8 in viral anterior uveitis, and contractility and fibrogenic activity of trabecular meshwork cells. Sci Rep. (2021) 11:14950. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-94391-2
12. Arias MA, Jaramillo G, López Y, Mejía N, Mejía C, Pantoja AE, et al. Mycobacterium tuberculosis antigens specifically modulate CCR2 and MCP-1/CCL2 on lymphoid cells from human pulmonary hilar lymph nodes. J Immunol. (2007) 179:8381–91. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.179.12.8381
13. Mittal P, Wang L, Akimova T, Leach CA, Clemente JC, Sender MR, et al. The CCR2/MCP-1 chemokine pathway and lung adenocarcinoma. Cancers. (2020) 12:3723. doi: 10.3390/cancers12123723
14. Yang S, Yu J, Dong X, Zeng J, Tan L, Zhang H, et al. CCR2 signaling regulates anti-chlamydia T cell immune responses in the airway. PloS pathogens. (2025) 21:e1012912. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1012912
15. Ravesloot-Chávez MM, Van Dis E, and Stanley SA. The innate immune response to Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Annu Rev Immunol. (2021) 39:611–37. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-093019-010426
16. Ahmad F, Rani A, Alam A, Zarin S, Pandey S, Singh H, et al. Macrophage: a cell with many faces and functions in tuberculosis. Front Immunol. (2022) 13:747799. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.747799
17. Zhang B, Xiang L, Chen J, Zhang J, Dong R, Mo G, et al. GRN activates TNFR2 to promote macrophage M2 polarization aggravating mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Front Bioscience-Landmark. (2024) 29:332. doi: 10.31083/j.fbl2909332
18. Passos BB, Araújo-Pereira M, Vinhaes CL, Amaral EP, and Andrade BB. The role of ESAT-6 in tuberculosis immunopathology. Front Immunol. (2024) 15:1383098. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1383098
19. Cao Z, Tian K, Ran Y, Zhou H, Zhou L, Ding Y, et al. Beclin-1: a therapeutic target at the intersection of autophagy, immunotherapy, and cancer treatment. Front Immunol. (2024) 15:1506426. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1506426
20. Ghanavi J, Farnia P, Farnia P, and Velayati AA. The role of interferon-gamma and interferon-gamma receptor in tuberculosis and nontuberculous mycobacterial infections. Int J Mycobacteriology. (2021) 10:349–57. doi: 10.4103/ijmy.ijmy_186_21
21. Hult C, Mattila JT, Gideon HP, Linderman JJ, and Kirschner DE. Neutrophil dynamics affect Mycobacterium tuberculosis granuloma outcomes and dissemination. Front Immunol. (2021) 12:712457. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.712457
22. Hosaka Y, Itoh K, Matsutani S, Kawate S, Miura A, Mizoura Y, et al. Fermented food Tempeh induces interleukin 12 and enhances macrophage phagocytosis. J Food Biochem. (2021) 45:e13958. doi: 10.1111/jfbc.13958
23. Shao S, Zhou D, Feng J, Liu Y, Baturuhu, Yin H, et al. Regulation of inflammation and immunity in sepsis by E3 ligases. Front Endocrinology. (2023) 14:1124334. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1124334
24. Hu L, Lu J, Fan H, Niu C, Han Y, Caiyin Q, et al. FAS mediates apoptosis, inflammation, and treatment of pathogen infection. Front Cell Infection Microbiol. (2025) 15:1561102. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2025.1561102
25. Mani M, Park JW, and Martin TF. Regulatory mechanisms and therapeutic targeting of PD-L1 trafficking and stability in cancer immunotherapy. Cancers. (2025) 17:1747. doi: 10.3390/cancers17111747
26. Sugiyama D, Hinohara K, and Nishikawa H. Significance of regulatory T cells in cancer immunology and immunotherapy. Exp Dermatol. (2023) 32:256–63. doi: 10.1111/exd.14721
27. Ogishi M, Yang R, Aytekin C, Langlais D, Bourgey M, Khan T, et al. Inherited PD-1 deficiency underlies tuberculosis and autoimmunity in a child. Nat Med. (2021) 27:1646–54. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01388-5
28. Russell DG, Simwela NV, Mattila JT, Flynn J, Mwandumba HC, and Pisu D. How macrophage heterogeneity affects tuberculosis disease and therapy. Nat Rev Immunol. (2025) 25:370–84. doi: 10.1038/s41577-024-01124-3
29. Sun F, Li J, Cao L, and Yan C. Mycobacterium tuberculosis virulence protein ESAT-6 influences M1/M2 polarization and macrophage apoptosis to regulate tuberculosis progression. Genes Genomics. (2024) 46:37–47. doi: 10.1007/s13258-023-01469-4
30. Shan L, Wang Z, Wu L, Qian K, Peng G, Wei M, et al. Statistical and network analyses reveal mechanisms for the enhancement of macrophage immunity by manganese in Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Biochem Biophysics Rep. (2024) 37:101602. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrep.2023.101602
31. Le Y, Cao W, Zhou L, Fan X, Liu Q, Liu F, et al. Infection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis promotes both M1/M2 polarization and MMP production in cigarette smoke-exposed macrophages. Front Immunol. (2020) 11:1902. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01902
32. Zhang Y, Li S, Liu Q, Long R, Feng J, Qin H, et al. Mycobacterium tuberculosis heat-shock protein 16.3 induces macrophage M2 polarization through CCRL2/CX3CR1. Inflammation. (2020) 43:487–506. doi: 10.1007/s10753-019-01132-9
33. Chatterjee S, Yabaji SM, Rukhlenko OS, Bhattacharya B, Waligurski E, Vallavoju N, et al. Channeling macrophage polarization by rocaglates increases macrophage resistance to Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Iscience. (2021) 24. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.102845
34. Zhou C, Weng J, Liu C, Liu S, Hu Z, Xie X, et al. Disruption of SLFN11 deficiency–induced CCL2 signaling and macrophage M2 polarization potentiates anti–PD-1 therapy efficacy in hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology. (2023) 164:1261–78. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2023.02.005
Keywords: H37Ra, immunity, M2 macrophage polarization, MCP-1/CCR2 axis, mycobacterium tuberculosis
Citation: Zhao G, Guo C, Li X, Tan L, Chen X, Tian F, Zhang L, Wang X and Cui J (2026) MCP-1/CCR2 axis regulates M2 macrophage polarization and immunosuppression in mycobacterium tuberculosis. Front. Immunol. 16:1698369. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1698369
Received: 03 September 2025; Accepted: 08 December 2025; Revised: 04 December 2025;
Published: 05 January 2026.
Edited by:
Esaki M. Shankar, Central University of Tamil Nadu, IndiaReviewed by:
Namrata Anand, University of Chicago Medical Center, United StatesFaraz Ahmad, University of Wisconsin-Madison, United States
Copyright © 2026 Zhao, Guo, Li, Tan, Chen, Tian, Zhang, Wang and Cui. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Junwei Cui, Y2p3ODY5M0AxNjMuY29t; Xia Wang, d2FuZ3hpYTU1MTlAMTYzLmNvbQ==
†These authors share first authorship
Xiaoyang Li1