ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Immunol.
Sec. NK and Innate Lymphoid Cell Biology
This article is part of the Research TopicUnderlying Molecular Mechanisms in Psychiatric Disorders and Potential Therapeutic StrategiesView all articles
Multi-omics integration identifies NK cell dysregulation and a five-gene diagnostic signature in major depressive disorder
Provisionally accepted- 1Yan'an Hospital Affiliated To Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China
- 2Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), a leading global disability affecting 280 million people, has poor treatment efficacy due to persistent biological variability involving cell-type-specific transcriptomic dysregulation and immune dysfunction, and integrated multi-omics approaches are vital to uncover pathways and therapeutic targets. Methods: This research utilized a comprehensive multi-omics approach, merging bulk RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) data from the GSE39653 dataset with single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data derived from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of three MDD patients and three healthy controls. Analysis of differential gene expression (DEGs1) and identification of genes inside Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis (WGCNA) modules were conducted using bulk RNA-seq data. Analysis of differential cell population abundance and DEGs2 was performed on the scRNA-seq data. Detection of CD3⁻CD56⁺ or CD3⁻CD16⁺ NK cells in human peripheral blood samples by flow cytometry. Candidate genes were subsequently identified from the intersection of DEGs1, WGCNA module genes, and DEGs2. Subsequently, machine learning methods were employed to discern key genes from these candidates. The functional characterisation of essential cell populations was accomplished via pseudotime trajectory analysis, Gene Set Variation Analysis (GSVA), metabolic pathway analysis (scMetabolism), and transcription factor inference (SCENIC). Ultimately, diagnostic models, regulatory networks, and compound screenings were developed based on the key genes. Results: In the RNA-seq analysis, 803 DEGs1 and 2080 WGCNA module genes were identified. scRNA-seq analysis revealed 1,539 DEGs2 and identified natural killer (NK) cells as a major dysfunctional immune cell subpopulation in MDD, exhibiting a significantly increased proportion (CD3⁻CD56⁺ or CD3⁻CD16⁺, p < 0.05) in the MDD patients. The intersection of DEGs1, WGCNA module genes, and DEGs2 yielded 26 candidate genes. Subsequent machine learning analysis identified five key genes: CSPP1, ZNF84, HLA-DPA1, CCZ1, and LRRC8D. A diagnostic nomogram constructed using these key genes demonstrated robust discriminatory performance in distinguishing MDD patients. Mechanistic investigations implicated these five key genes in MDD pathogenesis through neurodegenerative signaling pathways. Conclusion: Our study establishes NK cell dysfunction as a core pathophysiological mechanism in MDD. The identified key genes serve as robust diagnostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets. Elucidation of their regulatory networks provides critical insights for precision psychiatry interventions.
Keywords: key genes, Major Depressive Disorder, molecular mechanism, Multi-omics integration, NK cells
Received: 08 Sep 2025; Accepted: 18 Dec 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Wang, Kuang, Peng, Yuan, Ji, Chen, Tian, Zhou, Chen, Li, Feng and Nie. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Lei Feng
Shengjie Nie
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
