Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

REVIEW article

Front. Immunol., 06 January 2026

Sec. Cancer Immunity and Immunotherapy

Volume 16 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2025.1701305

This article is part of the Research TopicUnlocking the Potential of Extracellular Vesicles in Tumor Immunity and Drug ResistanceView all articles

Exosomal crosstalk: the metastatic language of hepatocellular carcinoma

  • 1The First School of Clinical Medical, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China
  • 2Department of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (Zhejiang Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine), Hangzhou, China

Exosomes have garnered considerable attention in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) research owing to their critical function in regulating intercellular communication within the tumor microenvironment. Their inherent composition, structural integrity, and cargo-specific properties underpin critical functions in orchestrating cellular information transfer. This review delineates the fundamental biology of exosomes, their multifaceted pathophysiological roles in HCC, and the inherent translational promise of exosome-based therapeutic platforms for HCC management. Emerging evidence positions exosomes as dual-functional entities in HCC: not only propagating tumor progression and metastasis but also emerging as liquid biopsy-based diagnostic indicators for early detection and prognostic stratification, as well as nanoscale delivery platforms for site-specific therapeutic payloads. Nevertheless, despite growing recognition of exosomal functions in HCC, the precise mechanisms governing their functional duality and clinical translatability demand further elucidation. Through critical appraisal of extant literature, this review delineates actionable research priorities to catalyze mechanistic dissection and accelerate bench-to-bedside translation in exosome-based HCC management.

1 Introduction

Based on the latest cancer statistics, liver cancer accounts for the sixth position in terms of malignant tumors incidence and ranks third in mortality worldwide. In 2022, there were 865,000 new cases of liver cancer and 758,000 deaths globally, accounting for 4.3% and 7.8% of all malignant tumor incidences and deaths, respectively (1). In China, the incidence rate (12.7/100,000) and mortality rate (10.9/100,000) of liver cancer in males are approximately 2- to 3- fold exceeding those in females, whose incidence rate and mortality rate are 4.8/100,000 and 4.1/100,000, respectively. Primary liver cancers mainly include hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (approximately 75% to 85%) and cholangiocarcinoma (approximately 10% to 15%). Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections represent major established etiological drivers of HCC, while other significant risk factors include dietary aflatoxin exposure, obesity, heavy alcohol consumption, tobacco smoking, and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) (2, 3). High rates of metastasis and recurrence, along with short survival, remain major challenges in clinical practice (4). Studies of tumorigenic mechanisms in HCC have revealed that exosomes, as key mediators, play crucial roles in intercellular signaling, tumor microenvironment formation, and immune evasion processes. Exosomes represent a subclass of nanoscale extracellular vesicles (30–150 nm in diameter) that function as intercellular signaling mediators through the targeted delivery of bioactive cargo (including proteins, nucleic acids, and lipids) to recipient cells, thereby orchestrating critical physiological and pathological processes (5). On this basis, exosomes derived from HCC can regulate the tumor microenvironment, which could be used as promising diagnostic biomarkers and tractable therapeutic targets (6). Consequently, this review summarizes current evidence bridging biological characteristics of exosomes to clinical application in HCC, with the ultimate goal of informing novel diagnostic frameworks and molecularly targeted interventions.

2 Overview of exosomes

Exosomes are extracellular vesicles that possess a lipid bilayer, 30–150 nm diameter, whose seminal discovery emerged from Johnstone’s 1987 pivotal investigation of reticulocyte maturation dynamics (7). Exosome biogenesis constitutes a tightly regulated multistep process. First of all, the cell membrane invaginates, forming a cup-like structure that encloses cell proteins and extracellular components, resulting in the formation of early-sorting endosomes (ESEs). Subsequently, the ESE membrane is concave inward, encapsulating proteins, nucleic acids and metabolites in the cytosol into the ESEs to form late-sorting endosomes (LSEs). Then LSEs mature into multivesicular bodies (MVBs), some of which are degraded by fusion with autophagosomes or lysosomes, while others can fuse with the plasma membrane and release intraluminal vesicles to the extracellular, which are ultimately exosomes (8, 9) (Figure 1).

Figure 1
Diagram illustrating the process of exosome formation and function in hepatocellular carcinoma. Extracellular components lead to early-sorting endosomes, then late-sorting endosomes, and form multivesicular bodies that release exosomes. Exosomes contain DNA, LncRNA, mRNA, miRNA, lipids, and proteins. Their characteristics include strong communication, high stability, low immunogenicity, and strong targeting.

Figure 1. Biogenesis and basic characteristics of exosomes.

Exosomes are ubiquitous in physiological fluids (e.g., blood, urine, saliva), which contain nucleic acids, proteins, and lipids. Their release could reshape the tumor immune microenvironment, which is regulated by various intracellular and extracellular factors (1012). Endowed with unique properties, exosomes hold potential as biomarkers and drug delivery vehicles (1316): (1) intercellular communication: exosomes serve as communication carriers for biological signaling, coordinating cellular processes such as proliferation, differentiation, and senescence; (2) high stability: the phospholipid bilayer structure of exosomes protects their contents from external environment, enabling them to remain stable in body fluids and even traverse certain biological barriers; (3) low immunogenicity: exosomes exhibit excellent biocompatibility and high safety profile; (4) targeted delivery: the components within exosomes can bind to specific surface receptors on target cells, enabling precise targeting to lesion sites.

3 Exosomes: active orchestrators in HCC

3.1 Exosomes are involved in HCC angiogenesis

HCC is characterized by abundant blood supply, and exosomes are involved in all aspects of angiogenesis in HCC. Tumor-derived exosomes orchestrate pro-angiogenic crosstalk by transferring oncogenic cargoes to vascular endothelial cells, thereby driving neovascularization within the tumor microenvironment (17). HCC-derived exosomes delivered angiopoietin-2 (ANGPT2), which was transported to human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) by endocytosis to drive robust pro-angiogenic responses. However, by CRISPR-Cas system knockout, the angiogenesis driven by exosome-borne ANGPT2 could be significantly inhibited, and the activation of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in HCC can also be suppressed (18). Rab27A/B orchestrate exosome secretion via governing MVB-plasma membrane docking and fusion, thereby accelerating tumor progression by enhanced delivery of pro-metastatic cargoes. Zhang Z et al. discovered that PRR34-AS1 promoted exosomal secretion of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) in HCC cells by increasing Rab27A expression. This process enhanced the malignant phenotype of human liver epithelial cells, which propelled HCC proliferation and neovascularization (19). Additionally, hypoxic environment promoted the secretion of exosome glypican-3 (GPC3) by activating hypoxia-inducible factor 1-alpha (HIF-1α). This enhanced HCC oncogenesis through proliferative signaling by Wnt/β-catenin-mediated induction, migratory capacity, and EMT processes. Meanwhile, the angiogenic potential of HUVECs was enhanced, suggesting that hypoxia-induced exosomal factors contributed to angiogenesis of HCC (20). While Yusuke Matsuura (21) detected that miR-155 was also substantially up-regulated in hypoxic conditions, inducing the proliferation of HUVECs. Although the mechanisms have not been further clarified, clinical data from a small sample size showed that in the plasma of HCC patients, the high expression of exosomal miR-155 was significantly associated to recurrence and metastasis after radical surgery. Li Zhang (22) also discovered that miR-155 could promote growth of HCC via the AT-rich interactive domain 2 (ARID2) -mediated AKT phosphorylation pathway. This discovery established a clinically actionable reference for prognostic stratification and survival prediction in HCC patients. XY Huang (23) observed that circRNA-100,338 was markedly upregulated in metastatic HCC, which enhanced the invasion ability of HCC. In vitro and in vivo analyses demonstrated that exosomal circRNA-100,338 orchestrated pro-angiogenic phenotypes in HUVECs, including enhanced proliferation, vasculogenic mimicry formation, microvascular permeability, and neovascularization. XJ Lin et al. (24) suggested that high level of miR-210 in HCC serum was associated with higher microvascular density in tissues. Exosomal miR-210 can be conveyed to endothelial cells, leading to facilitating tumor angiogenesis via targeting inhibition of sma and mad homolog 4 (SMAD4) and signal transducer and activator of transcription 6 (STAT6). Kai Zhu (25) discovered that miR-146a could mediate breast cancer susceptibility gene 1 (BRCA1) to increase the level of platelet-derived growth factor receptor α (PDGFRA), which was associated with microvascular invasion. However, it is interesting that exosomal miR-451a, acting as a tumor suppressor, was observed to trigger apoptosis in both HCC cell and HUVECs. Furthermore, miR-451a inhibited the migration of HUVECs and changed the permeability of blood vessels, which could potentially reduce tumor angiogenesis (26). SS Dong (27) also found that miR-3682-3p released by HCC cells reduced angiogenesis by targeting angiopoietin-1 to inhibit RAS-MEK1/2-ERK1/2 signaling pathway. In summary, exosomes exert multifaceted core regulatory roles in the angiogenesis process of HCC. Acting as key information carriers, they transport various functional molecules (such as ANGPT2, miR-155, circRNA-100,338, miR-210, etc.) to vascular endothelial cells, thereby promoting endothelial cell proliferation, migration, and neovascularization. Meanwhile, studies have revealed that certain exosomal cargos (e.g., miR-451a, miR-3682-3p) inhibit angiogenesis by triggering endothelial cell apoptosis and targeting angiopoietin-1 to suppress RAS-MEK1/2-ERK1/2 signaling pathways, demonstrating their dual functional nature. These findings not only reveal key mechanisms of exosomes in HCC progression but also provide robust theoretical support for their potential as anti-angiogenic therapeutic targets and prognostic biomarkers.

3.2 Exosomes are involved in HCC invasion and metastasis

Exosomes are crucial mediators in the tumor microenvironment, which are involved in intercellular communication, and playing an indispensable role in the invasion and metastasis of HCC. The exosome M2 macrophage polarization associated lncRNA (LncMMPA) was secreted by tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs). It can not only polarize M2 macrophages but also function as a competitive microRNA sponge for miR-548s, leading to the transcriptional upregulation of aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 family member A3 (ALDH1A3). This elevation in ALDH1A3 expression enhanced glucose metabolism and accelerated cellular proliferation in HCC (28). The investigators (29) observed that the expression profile in HCC was characterized by a significant increase of miR-27a-3p and a concomitant decrease in thioredoxin-interacting protein (TXNIP). Furthermore, M2 macrophage-derived exosome miR-27a-3p further affected HCC proliferation, migration, invasion, and drug resistance via targeting TXNIP. XH Zhou (30) found that HCC-derived exosomes induced the overexpression of microRNA-761 (miR-761) in HCC, and reprogrammed the tumor microenvironment via targeting the SOCS2/JAK2/STAT3 pathway, which activated the tumor-associated fibroblasts (CAFs). Consistent with prior evidence (31), lysyl oxidase-like 4 (LOXL4) was significantly upregulated in HCC and correlated with poor clinical prognosis. Mechanistically, exosome-derived LOXL4 orchestrated FAK/Src pathway activation by hydrogen peroxide-mediated signaling, thereby enhancing adhesion, migratory, and invasive potential of tumor cells. Furthermore, HCC-derived exosomes transferred LOXL4 to HUVECs by a paracrine mechanism to enhance tumor angiogenesis. Moreover, exosome-derived miR-375 could promote the proliferation and migration of HCC by targeting insulin growth factor binding protein 4 (IGFBP4) (32). The clinical trial (33) discovered that exosomes derived from S100A4, a metastasis-associated protein, activated the EMT process, consequently accelerating invasive protrusion and metastatic dissemination in HCC. Notably, we uncovered a context-dependent functional duality of exosomes in HCC, where specific subpopulations exerted paradoxical pro-tumorigenic and tumor-suppressive effects through distinct cargo-mediated signaling pathways. Lei Zhang et al. (34) found that macrophages that overexpressing recombination signal binding protein for immunoglobulin kappa J region (RBPJ) secreted exosomal circRNAs, which inhibited the proliferation and metastasis of HCC and promoted apoptosis via the hsa_circ_0004658/miR-499b-5p/JAM3 pathway. YS Ma (35) showed that miR-15a, exosomes derived from mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), had the capacity to interact with spalt-like transcription factor 4 (SALL4), which could slow the proliferation, migration, and invasive potential of HCC. In normal hepatic tissue, miR-199a-3p ranks as the third most abundant miRNA, yet its expression is markedly downregulated in HCC. Functionally, miR-199a-3p acted as a tumor suppressor by directly targeting multiple oncogenic drivers-including HIF-1α, p21-activated kinase 4 (PAK4), yes-associated protein 1 (YAP1), VEGF-A, hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), and matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP2), thereby potently inhibiting HCC proliferation, migration, invasion, and angiogenesis (3638). In conclusion, exosomes function as pivotal mediators within the tumor microenvironment, playing a central role in HCC invasion and metastasis by transmitting various bioactive molecules. These exosomes originate not only from tumor cells but also from components in the microenvironment, such as TAMs and macrophages. They collectively promote malignant progression of HCC by regulating glucose metabolism, activating some signaling pathways (e.g., FAK/Src, JAM3), influencing EMT, and modulating angiogenesis. Notably, exosomal functions exhibit context-dependent properties: certain exosomal subpopulations (e.g., those carrying miR-15a or miR-199a-3p) demonstrate tumor-suppressive activity by inhibiting proliferation and migration while inducing apoptosis. This dual role highlights the complexity of exosome-mediated signaling in HCC, where functional outcomes may be determined by cargo composition and cellular origin.

3.3 Exosomes are involved in HCC immune evasion

Tumor can orchestrate macrophage polarization towards either the antitumor M1 or pro-tumorigenic M2 phenotypes. HCC-derived exosomes orchestrate macrophage activation and polarization towards the pro-tumorigenic M2 phenotype via diverse mechanisms, including transfer of specific cytokines and modulation of signaling pathways. This creates an immunosuppressive microenvironment that facilitates immune evasion (39). LncRNA TUC339, highly abundant in HCC-derived extracellular vesicles, functions as a key regulator in facilitating tumorigenesis and metastatic dissemination. Moreover, it is critically involved in dictating M1/M2 macrophage polarization that may facilitate immune evasion (40). CL Yin (41) reported that HCC-derived exosomes drove polarization towards M2 tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) by triggering NF-κB signaling pathway and stimulating pro-inflammatory factors secretion. Tumor cell-derived exosomes also serve as vehicles for the delivery of miRNA to macrophages, orchestrating functional reprogramming and phenotypic modulation of recipient cells. For example, exosome miR-23a-3p derived from HCC can upregulate programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in macrophages and suppress the functional activity of T cells, which may promote immune evasion (42). Neutrophils are crucial components of the innate immune system, and the study showed that TGF-β and Axl-induced CXCL5 boosted neutrophil infiltration in HCC, which may accelerate tumor growth (43). Natural killer (NK) cells are the first-line effectors in cancer immunosurveillance. The prognostic of patients with HCC was closely related to the quantity of NK cells in both peripheral blood and the tumor microenvironment (44). YL Yang (45) reported that both HBV proteins and nucleic acids are detected in serum exosomes from chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients, and these exosomes actively transmitted HBV to hepatocytes. And HBV-positive exosomes could hamper the proliferation and survival of NK cells, including cytolytic activity, the production of interferon (IFN)-γ and the responsiveness of the cells to poly (I:C) stimulation. However, LH Lv et al. (46) found out that exosomes from HepG2, which were treated with anticancer drugs, showed increased immunogenicity in triggering NK cells responses specific to heat shock proteins (HSPs), resulting in strong antitumor effects. Consequently, deeper mechanistic investigations between HCC-derived exosomes and NK cell function are necessary, with findings holding significant potential for immunotherapeutic advancement. The activation of regulatory T cells (Tregs) is regarded as one of the most crucial immune escape mechanisms in tumor (47). CircGSE1 drove HCC progression by miR-324-5p/TGFBR1/Smad3 pathway, which upregulated Tregs, and inhibited the activation of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells (48). XC Wang (49) revealed that 14-3-3ζ, which may be presented to T cells by exosomes, increased in the HCC and suppressed the anti-tumor immunity of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). In addition, NKG2D ligands expressed by exosomes had a strong ability to attenuate the cytotoxic function of NK cells and cytotoxic T cells (50). LS Ye et al. (51) revealed that patients with HCC exhibited a significant enrichment of TIM-1+ regulatory B cells (Bregs) within the tumor microenvironment. These infiltrating Bregs were characterized by their robust expression of the immunosuppressive cytokine IL-10 and induced potent suppression of CD8+ T cell effector function. Moreover, by the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and Toll-like receptor (TLR) 2/4 signaling pathways, exosome-derived high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) triggered B cells and encouraged TIM-1+ Breg cell proliferation. Notably, Quan Rao (52) demonstrated that HCC-derived exosomes paradoxically potentiated dendritic cells (DC) activation and triggered antigen-specific CD8+ T cell expansion, suggesting their dual role in modulating antitumor immunity. In summary, exosomes exert multifaceted roles in reshaping the tumor immune microenvironment (Table 1). They actively promote macrophages polarization toward the pro-tumor M2 phenotype, attenuate the cytotoxic function of NK cells, enhance the expansion and activation of immunosuppressive cells such as Treg cells and Breg cells, and suppress effector T cell responses. These synergistic effects collectively establish a potent immunosuppressive environment that facilitates tumor immune evasion. Interestingly, we also observed that specific exosome subpopulations, particularly under distinct conditions such as drug treatment or antigen presentation, may paradoxically enhance immune activation, highlighting the complexity of their immunoregulatory functions. A deeper understanding of the mechanisms underlying these processes is crucial for developing novel exosome-based immunotherapy strategies for HCC.

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Regulation of exosomes in the tumor microenvironment.

3.4 Exosomes are involved in HCC therapeutic resistance

Sorafenib and Lenvatinib constitute the cornerstone first-line systemic therapies for advanced HCC (53). However, the emergence of drug resistance substantially curtails their therapeutic efficacy and long-term clinical utility. Consequently, emerging researches are focusing on harnessing exosome-based strategies to overcome or delay the acquired resistance in HCC (54). MiR-200c-3p in M2 macrophage exosomes can influence the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway via obstructing the interaction between BAP1 gene and PTEN gene in hepatocytes, which could strengthen the resistance to sorafenib (55). GH Wang et al. (56) discovered that miR-744 was downregulated in exosomes released by HCC tissues and cell lines, which consequently facilitated the proliferation of HCC while reducing the chemosensitivity to sorafenib. Sorafenib significantly modulated the miRNA expression profile in HCC, altering the abundance of at least 11 specific miRNAs (57). This modulation had dualistic functional consequences: tumor-suppressive miRNAs, like miR-200c-3p and miR-27a-3p, were upregulated, inhibiting migration and invasion. Meanwhile, sorafenib increased the expression of oncogenic miRNAs, including miR-122-5p, miR-148b-3p, miR-194-5p, miR-222-5p, and miR-512-3p, which collectively enhanced tumorigenicity by driving proliferative signaling, promoting invasiveness, and conferring resistance to apoptosis. MB Cao (58, 59) discovered that exosome-derived lnc-FAM72D-3 changed the cytoskeleton of HCC by the MBNL1/FAK pathway and hsa_circ_0007132 inhibited the ubiquitin-mediated degradation of NONO, which both increased resistance of Lenvatinib. XH Yao et al. (60) showed that miR-9 facilitated EMT and bolstered the migratory and invasion HCC cells. Concurrently, miR-9 had the potential to promote the resistance to anti-angiogenesis therapy via the secretion of VEGF-exosomes mediated by tumor-associated endothelial cells (TAECs). XC Wei et al. (61) indicated that hepatitis B core antigen (HBc) upregulated the expression of miR-135a-5p, which was highly enriched in HCC tissues, and directly targeted vesicle-associated membrane protein 2 (VAMP2). Through the newly identified miR-135a-5p/VAMP2 signaling pathway, HBc promoted proliferation and induced chemoresistance in HCC. Taken together, sorafenib and Lenvatinib are first-line treatments for advanced HCC, but acquired resistance severely limits their clinical efficacy, which may be potentially involved in exosome-mediated mechanisms. Exosomes transport specific miRNAs (e.g., miR-200c-3p, miR-744) and lncRNAs (e.g., lnc-FAM72D-3, hsa_circ_0007132) that activate pro-tumor signaling pathways, and inhibit drug-induced apoptosis. Therefore, targeting their biogenesis or receptor-mediated delivery pathways offers a promising avenue to overcome current therapeutic bottlenecks and propel the clinical translation of precision-guided resistance reversal strategies.

3.5 Exosomes are used as biomarkers for diagnosis and prognosis

Current researches are intensively investigating exosome-derived molecular biomarkers that exhibit HCC-specificity and dynamically reflect disease progression, metastasis, and prognostic (Table 2). Based on liquid biopsy technology, these exosomes hold significant potential in early diagnosis, therapeutic efficacy monitoring, and prognosis assessment (75, 76) (Figure 2). XQ Ding (77) deciphered the diagnostic-prognostic value of exosome-associated gene signatures in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)-driven HCC, offering new biomarkers for prognosis management of NAFLD-HCC patients. JC Wang (62) indicated that the exosomal lncRNA SENP3-EIF4A1 in the plasma of HCC patients was markedly lower compared with the healthy individuals. And SENP3-EIF4A1 could be transferred to HCC cells via exosomes, which may stimulate apoptosis while reducing HCC invasion and metastasis. So SENP3-EIF4A1 hold potential as a promising novel biomarker for the clinical detection of HCC. Peng Deng (63) showed that serum exosomal miR-122 and miR-148a were lower in HCC. This downregulation was negatively correlated with clinical stage and lymph node metastasis, while it showed a positive association with the level of tumor differentiation, patient survival rates, and the concentrations of serum markers associated with HCC. Suehiro T et al. (64) suggested that levels of exosomal miR-122 may function as indicators of hepatic injury and remaining liver functionality. Their findings revealed a marked downregulation of miR-122 by post-transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), particularly among patient with liver cancer. And a lower miR-122 ratio has been related to a poor prognosis. Patricia de la Cruz-Ojeda (57) demonstrated that the level of circulating miR-200c-3p was relevant to improved survival, while high concentrations of miR-222-5p and miR-512-3p were correlated with unfavorable prognostic indicators. XF Xue (65) also revealed that the serum of HCC patients had different levels of miR-122, miR-125b, miR-145, miR-192, miR-194, miR-29a, miR-17-5p, and miR-106a compared with normal controls, which could act as diagnostic biomarkers of HCC. MiR-106a was a prognostic factor for HCC that regulated MAPK and JNK pathways to promote tumorigenesis. Dan Rao (66) and HW Wu (67) both reported that the poor prognosis was closely related to the serious upregulation of miR-425-5p in HCC tissues. So, we could prevent HCC migration and proliferation by knocking out miR-425-5p. We mentioned above that miR-199a-3p was expressed in normal liver tissue but was declining in HCC, which may also be correlated with poor prognosis (68). In the study of YX Xu team (69), low level of miR-451a and high level of a disintegrin and metalloprotease 10 (ADAM10) may indicate a poor prognosis of HCC patients. MiR-136-5p and MMP2 were two crucial players in HCC metastasis in the rescue experiments. Patients who had low level of miR-136-5p and high levels of circ_MMP2 or MMP2 may have poor overall survival (70). Furthermore, miR-21 (71), miR-26a (72), miR-146a (25), miR-155 (23, 73), miR-182, and miR-331-3p (74) have been shown to link to the diagnosis or prognosis of HCC. Taken together, exosomes and their contents are stable in body fluids, which can reflect the state of the source cells and the tumor microenvironment. Consequently, they may serve as the promising markers for diagnosis, prognosis, and monitoring, as well as novel targets for future treatments.

Table 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Key exosomal non-coding RNAs in HCC: expression and clinical value.

Figure 2
Diagram depicting the collection and processing of bodily fluids (saliva, blood, urine) for exosome separation, using methods like ultracentrifugation. Exosome contents are detected through techniques such as Western Blot and RT-qPCR. Applications include diagnosis, therapeutic efficacy assessment, and prognosis.

Figure 2. Exosomes as biomarkers: from liquid biopsy to clinical application.

Synthesizing these lines of evidence, we propose that exosomes may represent a “double-edged sword” in HCC. The function of exosomes in HCC is determined by multiple interrelated factors: cellular origin, tumor microenvironment, and specific cargo loading mechanisms. If the parent cells are malignant tumor cells or TAMs, they could impose fundamental functional biases on the exosomes they generate. Secondly, dynamic conditions within the TME, such as hypoxia, nutrient deprivation, or therapeutic stress, can reprogram exosome biosynthesis and selectively enrich specific pro-tumor signals. Finally, active sorting mechanisms controlled by molecules like nucleic acids or proteins provide the ultimate specificity, ensuring precise loading of pro- or anti-tumor signals. The complex interplay between cellular origin, tumor microenvironment, and molecular sorting mechanisms ultimately determines the dual role of exosomes.

4 HCC therapeutic revolution: synergistic paradigms for advanced therapeutics

4.1 Personalized treatment

Exosomes can effectively delay clinical resistance to sorafenib. Treatment with miR-744-enriched exosomes markedly suppressed HCC cell proliferation, overcame chemoresistance, and restored sorafenib sensitivity (56). Human cerebral endothelial cell-derived exosomes carrying elevated miR-214 (hCEC-Exo-214) have been demonstrated to reduce the levels of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and splicing factor 3B subunit 3 (SF3B3) in HCC when combined with oxaliplatin and sorafenib. It could result in synergistic anti-tumor effects (78). Exosomes, as promising radiosensitizers, can synergize with radiotherapy to overcome radio resistance and potentiate tumoricidal efficacy. In HCC, high expression of exosomal circTMEM56 enhanced radiotherapy response via activating cGAS-STING pathway, driving tumor microenvironment reprogramming (79). Radiotherapy could result in the release of exosomes with elevated Maspin expression, which markedly suppressed tube formation and vascular endothelial growth in HUVECs. MiR-151a-3p suppressed p53 signaling pathway, triggered EMT, and promoted tumor growth, which was significantly reduced after radiotherapy (80). There is evidence that exosomes harboring PD-L1 can replicate the effect of cell-surface PD-L1, it may be used as a therapeutic adjuvant by decreasing exosomal PD-L1 to increase the effectiveness of PD-1/PD-L1 therapy in cancer (81). Liang Cheng (82) confirmed that exosomes from melatonin-treated HCC cells reprogrammed macrophages by reversing their immunosuppressive phenotype and promoting pro-inflammatory activation via the STAT3 pathway, which may offer a novel strategy to alleviate immunosuppression.

4.2 Targeted delivery vehicles

Furthermore, exosomes can function as drug delivery vehicles, enhancing drug targeting and stability (Figure 3). Mesenchymal stem cell (MSC)-derived exosomes can be used as clinically actionable natural nanocarriers for targeted molecular delivery. Specifically, exosomes from adipose tissue-derived MSCs could transport miR-199a-3p to HCC cells, which can increase the chemosensitivity to doxorubicin (83). Exosomes that are selectively targeted to HCC (ExoSP94-Lamp2b-RRM) could transport the multiplex small interfering RNA (multi-siRNA) to HCC tissues, which may improve the sorafenib-induced ferroptosis, and thus boost HCC sensitivity to sorafenib (84). Plant-derived exosomes, as emerging anticancer agents, enable targeted therapeutic delivery due to their inherent immunogenicity, biocompatibility, and cell-free nanostructure characteristics. For example, cannabidiol-enriched extracellular vesicles (CBD-EVs) significantly induce mitochondrial apoptosis in HCC cells, evidenced by G0/G1 cell cycle arrest and dose-dependent activation of the Bax/Bcl-2/caspase-9 signaling axis (85).

Figure 3
Diagram depicting exosome loading and modification for targeting tumor cells. Endogenous loading involves genetic engineering of source cells to create exosomes. Exogenous loading uses various techniques such as co-incubation and electroporation to modify exosomes. Engineered exosomes are used for precision targeting of tumor cells, illustrating potential applications in targeted therapies.

Figure 3. Exosome-mediated precision targeted therapy. There are two primary methods for loading drugs into exosomes. Endogenous loading: cells are transfected using genetic engineering techniques to express the desired proteins, nucleic acids, or drug molecules, followed by the isolation of exosomes containing the bioactive substances. Exogenous loading: First, separate exosomes. Then introduce drugs or bioactive substances using methods such as co-incubation, electroporation, sonication, freeze-thaw cycles, and extrusion. Subsequently, the surface of exosomes is engineered to display targeting ligands (e.g., peptides, antibodies, aptamers, and lipids), enabling precision delivery to specific cells or tissues.

4.3 Exosome vaccines

Exosomes released by HCC cells have soluble immunoregulatory compounds that severely restrict the lymphocyte proliferation. The cytotoxic effect of NK cells was significantly increased by MS-275 edited exosomes, by raising the production of major histocompatibility complex class I polypeptide-related sequence A (MICA), MICB, and HSP 70. It suggested that exosomes created by tumor cells treated with histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDACi) could be used as possible tumor vaccines against HCC (86). When compared with using exosomes or IL-12 alone, the combination of DC-Tumor derived exosomes (TEX) and IL-12 was superior in promoting T lymphocyte proliferation, releasing IFN-γ, and increasing cytotoxicity. Furthermore, the addition of IL-12 made up for the decreased IL-2 secretion by DCs driven by Tex (87). In mice of HCC, DC-derived exosomes (DEX) particularly increased DCs recruitment, accumulation, and activation, which led to enhanced tumor neoantigen cross-presentation and immune response (88, 89). By the use of an exosomal anchor peptide, BF Zuo (90) exhibited that TEXs painted with the functional domain of HMGN1 (TEX-N1ND) enhanced DC immunogenicity, potentially activating T cells and improving vaccine effectiveness. Exosomes, as novel sources of antigens, may offer new ideas for exosome-based cellular immunotherapy.

4.4 Engineered exosomes

SN Huang (91) discovered that the GPC3 scFv engineered and IR780-loaded exosomes (IR780@GPC3-EXOs) could quickly target HCC and cause notable tumor suppression by photothermal effects after near infrared (NIR) light. XQ Jia (37) designed a lentiviral vector for pre-miR-199a expression (Lenti-miR-199a), which can delay the proliferation of HCC both in vitro and in vivo via downregulating HIF-1α. Sushrut Kamerkar (92) designed the engineered exosome delivering an antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) targeting STAT6 (exoASO-STAT6), which selectively targeted tumor macrophages and produced potent antitumor activity. Silvia Baldari (93) noticed the delivery of miR-125b-loaded EVs made in engineered ASCs specifically decreased HCC cell proliferation in vitro, which was related to the p53 signaling pathway.

Collectively, exosomes offer transformative strategies to overcome therapeutic bottlenecks in HCC through a synergistic functional triumvirate: precise targeted delivery, immune potentiation, and closed-loop feedback regulation. Currently, the scalable production of exosomes faces significant challenges, including low yields of natural exosomes, high costs of engineered processes, and difficulty in maintaining biological activity. However, emerging strategies such as bioreactors, 3D cell culture models, and genetic engineering techniques offer new avenues (94, 95). Additionally, establishing standardized production protocols and strict quality control standards (e.g., purity and bioactivity) is equally critical, as these are prerequisites for scaling production and eventual clinical approval.

4.5 Clinical trials of exosomes in HCC

At present, there are no approved exosome-related products on the market, but researches on the application of exosomes are in full swing. Here, we list the latest clinical trials about exosomes in HCC for further research (Table 3).

Table 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Latest clinical trials about exosomes in HCC.

5 Conclusion

Currently, HCC remains a global health burden, whose clinical management facing multiple challenges such as high rates of late-stage diagnosis, limited treatment options, and strong treatment resistance. There is an urgent need to explore novel diagnostic and therapeutic strategies to meet clinical demands. Exosomes, as crucial mediators of intercellular communication, play multiple roles in the occurrence, progression and metastasis of HCC. Tumor-derived exosomes exert essential functions in remodeling the tumor microenvironment, affecting tumor angiogenesis, facilitating immune evasion, and conferring therapy resistance. Exosomes represent a “double-edged sword” in HCC: while inherently facilitating immune evasion, they can be engineered as powerful weapons to overcome therapeutic barriers. Exploiting their unique properties, exosomes serve as liquid biopsy diagnostic tools for early detection, dynamic biomarkers for prognostic monitoring, drug delivery vehicles for targeted therapy, and other emerging applications. Future research will focus on: (1) optimizing exosome-based diagnostic and prognostic prediction systems by screening highly specific biomarker combinations from multi-omics data and developing precise prognostic assessment models; (2) advancing precision exosome-mediated targeted therapy through improved drug delivery systems and exploration of combination treatment strategies; (3) promoting the clinical translation and standardization of exosome technology by enhancing preclinical safety and efficacy validations and establishing standardized isolation and production protocols. Collectively, exosomes exhibit great potential in HCC research and therapeutics. By delving deeper into their biological properties and clinical applicability, we can advance early detection, prognostic evaluation, and targeted therapy of HCC, ultimately enabling more precise and effective personalized regimens.

Author contributions

QX: Writing – original draft. JC: Writing – original draft. YL: Data curation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. JY: Data curation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. FZ: Supervision, Writing – review & editing. QS: Supervision, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declared that financial support was not received for this work and/or its publication.

Acknowledgments

Thanks to Figdraw for the drawing support. Thanks to all the authors for their contributions to this article, and thanks to the institution for its support.

Conflict of interest

The authors declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that Generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. (2024) 74:229–63. doi: 10.3322/caac.21834, PMID: 38572751

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. de Martel C, Georges D, Bray F, Ferlay J, and Clifford GM. Global burden of cancer attributab le to infections in 2018: a worldwide incidence analysis. Lancet Glob Health. (2020) 8:e180–90. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30488-7, PMID: 31862245

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Rumgay H, Ferlay J, de Martel C, Georges D, Ibrahim AS, Zheng R, et al. Global, regional and national burden of primary liver cancer by subtype. Eur J Cancer. (2022) 161:108–18. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.11.023, PMID: 34942552

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Li D, Xu L, Liu R, Yao Z, Zheng C, Jin S, et al. MAZ-mediated N6-methyladenosine modification of ZEB1 promotes hepatocellular carcinoma progression by regulating METTL3. J Transl Med. (2025) 23:265. doi: 10.1186/s12967-025-06314-8, PMID: 40038747

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Keerthikumar S, Chisanga D, Ariyaratne D, Al Saffar H, Anand S, Zhao K, et al. ExoCarta: A web-based compendium of exosomal cargo. J Mol Biol. (2016) 428:688–92. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2015.09.019, PMID: 26434508

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Wang HC, Yin WX, Jiang M, Han JY, Kuai XW, Sun R, et al. Function and biomedical implications of exosomal microRNAs delivered by parenchymal and nonparenchymal cells in hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. (2023) 29:5435–51. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i39.5435, PMID: 37900996

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Johnstone RM, Adam M, Hammond JR, Orr L, and Turbide C. Vesicle formation during reticulocyte maturation. Association of plasma membrane activities with released vesicles (exosomes). J Biol Chem. (1987) 262:9412–20. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)48095-7

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Wang Y, Xiao T, Zhao C, and Li G. The regulation of exosome generation and function in physiological and pathological processes. Int J Mol Sci. (2023) 25:255. doi: 10.3390/ijms25010255, PMID: 38203424

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Wang W, Qiao S, Kong X, Zhang G, and Cai Z. The role of exosomes in immunopathology and potential therapeutic implications. Cell Mol Immunol. (2025) 22:975–95. doi: 10.1038/s41423-025-01323-5, PMID: 40659888

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Koh YQ, Peiris HN, Vaswani K, Reed S, Rice GE, Salomon C, et al. Characterization of exosomal release in bovine endometrial intercaruncular stromal cells. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. (2016) 14:78. doi: 10.1186/s12958-016-0207-4, PMID: 27829441

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Sun Z, Yang S, Zhou Q, Wang G, Song J, Li Z, et al. Emerging role of exosome-derived long non-coding RNAs in tumor microenvironment. Mol Cancer. (2018) 17:82. doi: 10.1186/s12943-018-0831-z, PMID: 29678180

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Hu Z, Chen G, Zhao Y, Gao H, Li L, Yin Y, et al. Exosome-derived circCCAR1 promotes CD8 + T-cell dysfunction and anti-PD1 resistance in hepatocellular carcinoma. Mol Cancer. (2023) 22:55. doi: 10.1186/s12943-023-01759-1, PMID: 36932387

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Qi X, Chen S, He H, Wen W, and Wang H. The role and potential application of extracellular vesicles in liver cancer. Sci China Life Sci. (2021) 64:1281–94. doi: 10.1007/s11427-020-1905-7, PMID: 33847910

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Li C, Qin S, Wen Y, Zhao W, Huang Y, and Liu J. Overcoming the blood-brain barrier: Exosomes as theranostic nanocarriers for precision neuroimaging. J Control Release. (2022) 349:902–916. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.08.002, PMID: 35932883

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Wang X, Xia J, Yang L, Dai J, and He L. Recent progress in exosome research: isolation, characterization and clinical applications. Cancer Gene Ther. (2023) 30:1051–65. doi: 10.1038/s41417-023-00617-y, PMID: 37106070

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Tran PHL, Xiang D, Tran TTD, Yin W, Zhang Y, Kong L, et al. Exosomes and nanoengineering: A match made for precision therapeutics. Adv Mater. (2020) 32:e1904040. doi: 10.1002/adma.201904040, PMID: 31531916

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Chen W, Mao Y, Liu C, Wu H, and Chen S. Exosome in hepatocellular carcinoma: an update. J Cancer. (2021) 12:2526–36. doi: 10.7150/jca.54566, PMID: 33854614

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Xie JY, Wei JX, Lv LH, Han QF, Yang WB, Li GL, et al. Angiopoietin-2 induces angiogenesis via exosomes in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Cell Commun Signal. (2020) 18:46. doi: 10.1186/s12964-020-00535-8, PMID: 32183816

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Zhang Z, Zhou Y, Jia Y, Wang C, Zhang M, and Xu Z. PRR34-AS1 promotes exosome secretion of VEGF and TGF-β via recruiting DDX3X to stabilize Rab27a mRNA in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Transl Med. (2022) 20:491. doi: 10.1186/s12967-022-03628-9, PMID: 36303180

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Wang P, Tong K, Li Y, Li X, Zhang Y, Gu J, et al. The role and mechanism of HIF-1α-mediated glypican-3 secretion in hypoxia-induced tumor progression in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cell Signal. (2024) 114:111007. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2023.111007, PMID: 38081444

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Matsuura Y, Wada H, Eguchi H, Gotoh K, Kobayashi S, Kinoshita M, et al. Exosomal miR-155 derived from hepatocellular carcinoma cells under hypoxia promotes angiogenesis in endothelial cells. Dig Dis Sci. (2019) 64:792–802. doi: 10.1007/s10620-018-5380-1, PMID: 30465177

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Zhang L, Wang W, Li X, He S, Yao J, Wang X, et al. MicroRNA-155 promotes tumor growth of human hepatocellular carcinoma by targeting ARID2. Int J Oncol. (2016) 48:2425–34. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2016.3465, PMID: 27035278

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Huang XY, Huang ZL, Huang J, Xu B, Huang XY, Xu YH, et al. Exosomal circRNA-100338 promotes hepatocellular carcinoma metastasis via enhancing invasiveness and angiogenesis. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. (2020) 39:20. doi: 10.1186/s13046-020-1529-9, PMID: 31973767

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Lin XJ, Fang JH, Yang XJ, Zhang C, Yuan Y, Zheng L, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma cell-secreted exosomal microRNA-210 promotes angiogenesis in vitro and in vivo. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. (2018) 11:243–52. doi: 10.1016/j.omtn.2018.02.014, PMID: 29858059

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Zhu K, Pan Q, Zhang X, Kong LQ, Fan J, Dai Z, et al. MiR-146a enhances angiogenic activity of endothelial cells in hepatocellular carcinoma by promoting PDGFRA expression. Carcinogenesis. (2013) 34:2071–9. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgt160, PMID: 23671131

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Zhao S, Li J, Zhang G, Wang Q, Wu C, Zhang Q, et al. Exosomal miR-451a functions as a tumor suppressor in hepatocellular carcinoma by targeting LPIN1. Cell Physiol Biochem. (2019) 53:19–35. doi: 10.33594/000000118, PMID: 31162914

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Dong SS, Dong DD, Yang ZF, Zhu GQ, Gao DM, Chen J, et al. Exosomal miR-3682-3p Suppresses Angiogenesis by Targeting ANGPT1 via the RAS-MEK1/2-ERK1/2 Pathway in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Front Cell Dev Biol. (2021) 9:633358. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.633358, PMID: 33869178

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Xu M, Zhou C, Weng J, Chen Z, Zhou Q, Gao J, et al. Tumor associated macrophages-derived exosomes facilitate hepatocellular carcinoma Malignance by transferring lncMMPA to tumor cells and activating glycolysis pathway. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. (2022) 41:253. doi: 10.1186/s13046-022-02458-3, PMID: 35986343

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Li W, Xin X, Li X, Geng J, and Sun Y. Exosomes secreted by M2 macrophages promote cancer stemness of hepatocellular carcinoma via the miR-27a-3p/TXNIP pathways. Int Immunopharmacol. (2021) 101:107585. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2021.107585, PMID: 34601333

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Zhou XH, Xu H, Xu C, Yan YC, Zhang LS, Sun Q, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma-derived exosomal miRNA-761 regulates the tumor microenvironment by targeting the SOCS2/JAK2/STAT3 pathway. World J Emerg Med. (2022) 13:379–85. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2022.089, PMID: 36119773

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Li R, Wang Y, Zhang X, Feng M, Ma J, Li J, et al. Exosome-mediated secretion of LOXL4 promotes hepatocellular carcinoma cell invasion and metastasis. Mol Cancer. (2019) 18:18. doi: 10.1186/s12943-019-0948-8, PMID: 30704479

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Pradhan A, Shivaprasad S, Dey S, Goel A, Aggarwal R, and Das S. Exosome-associated microRNA-375 induces cell proliferation by regulating IGFBP4 upon hepatitis C virus infection. Mol Microbiol. (2022) 118:570–87. doi: 10.1111/mmi.14986, PMID: 36203260

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Qin Y, Wang C, Xu S, Zhou J, Li S, and Ye H. S100a4 promotes metastatic transformation in non-metastatic liver cancer cells through NMIIa binding: mechanistic insights. BMC Cancer. (2025) 25:1144. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14502-4, PMID: 40616024

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Zhang L, Zhang J, Li P, Li T, Zhou Z, and Wu H. Exosomal hsa_circ_0004658 derived from RBPJ overexpressed-macrophages inhibits hepatocellular carcinoma progression via miR-499b-5p/JAM3. Cell Death Dis. (2022) 13:32. doi: 10.1038/s41419-021-04345-9, PMID: 35013102

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Ma YS, Liu JB, Lin L, Zhang H, Wu JJ, Shi Y, et al. Exosomal microRNA-15a from mesenchymal stem cells impedes hepatocellular carcinoma progression via downregulation of SALL4. Cell Death Discov. (2021) 7:224. doi: 10.1038/s41420-021-00611-z, PMID: 34455417

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Ghosh A, Dasgupta D, Ghosh A, Roychoudhury S, Kumar D, Gorain M, et al. MiRNA199a-3p suppresses tumor growth, migration, invasion and angiogenesis in hepatocellular carcinoma by targeting VEGFA, VEGFR1, VEGFR2, HGF and MMP2. Cell Death Dis. (2017) 8:e2706. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2017.123, PMID: 28358369

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Jia XQ, Cheng HQ, Qian X, Bian CX, Shi ZM, Zhang JP, et al. Lentivirus-mediated overexpression of microRNA-199a inhibits cell proliferation of human hepatocellular carcinoma. Cell Biochem Biophys. (2012) 62:237–44. doi: 10.1007/s12013-011-9263-8, PMID: 21847633

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Hou J, Lin L, Zhou W, Wang Z, Ding G, Dong Q, et al. Identification of miRNomes in human liver and hepatocellular carcinoma reveals miR-199a/b-3p as therapeutic target for hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Cell. (2011) 19:232–43. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2011.01.001, PMID: 21316602

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Han Q, Zhao H, Jiang Y, Yin C, and Zhang J. HCC-derived exosomes: critical player and target for cancer immune escape. Cells. (2019) 8:558. doi: 10.3390/cells8060558, PMID: 31181729

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Li X, Lei Y, Wu M, and Li N. Regulation of macrophage activation and polarization by HCC-derived exosomal lncRNA TUC339. Int J Mol Sci. (2018) 19:2958. doi: 10.3390/ijms19102958, PMID: 30274167

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Yin C, Han Q, Xu D, Zheng B, Zhao X, and Zhang J. SALL4-mediated upregulation of exosomal miR-146a-5p drives T-cell exhaustion by M2 tumor-associated macrophages in HCC. Oncoimmunology. (2019) 8:1601479. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2019.1601479, PMID: 31143524

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Liu J, Fan L, Yu H, Zhang J, He Y, Feng D, et al. Endoplasmic reticulum stress causes liver cancer cells to release exosomal miR-23a-3p and up-regulate programmed death ligand 1 expression in macrophages. Hepatology. (2019) 70:241–58. doi: 10.1002/hep.30607, PMID: 30854665

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Haider C, Hnat J, Wagner R, Huber H, Timelthaler G, Grubinger M, et al. Transforming growth factor-β and axl induce CXCL5 and neutrophil recruitment in hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. (2019) 69:222–36. doi: 10.1002/hep.30166, PMID: 30014484

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Sun C, Sun HY, Xiao WH, Zhang C, and Tian ZG. Natural killer cell dysfunction in hepatocellular carcinoma and NK cell-based immunotherapy. Acta Pharmacol Sin. (2015) 36:1191–9. doi: 10.1038/aps.2015.41, PMID: 26073325

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Yang Y, Han Q, Hou Z, Zhang C, Tian Z, and Zhang J. Exosomes mediate hepatitis B virus (HBV) transmission and NK-cell dysfunction. Cell Mol Immunol. (2017) 14:465–75. doi: 10.1038/cmi.2016.24, PMID: 27238466

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Lv LH, Wan YL, Lin Y, Zhang W, Yang M, Li GL, et al. Anticancer drugs cause release of exosomes with heat shock proteins from human hepatocellular carcinoma cells that elicit effective natural killer cell antitumor responses in vitro. J Biol Chem. (2012) 287:15874–85. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.340588, PMID: 22396543

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Ou Y, Cannon MJ, and Nakagawa M. Regulatory T cells in gynecologic cancer. MOJ Immunol. (2018) 6:34–42. doi: 10.15406/moji.2018.06.00189

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Huang M, Huang X, and Huang N. Exosomal circGSE1 promotes immune escape of hepatocellular carcinoma by inducing the expansion of regulatory T cells. Cancer Sci. (2022) 113:1968–83. doi: 10.1111/cas.15365, PMID: 35396771

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Wang X, Shen H, Zhangyuan G, Huang R, Zhang W, He Q, et al. 14-3-3ζ delivered by hepatocellular carcinoma-derived exosomes impaired anti-tumor function of tumor-infiltrating T lymphocytes. Cell Death Dis. (2018) 9:159. doi: 10.1038/s41419-017-0180-7, PMID: 29415983

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Mincheva-Nilsson L and Baranov V. Cancer exosomes and NKG2D receptor-ligand interactions: impairing NKG2D-mediated cytotoxicity and anti-tumour immune surveillance. Semin Cancer Biol. (2014) 28:24–30. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2014.02.010, PMID: 24602822

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Ye L, Zhang Q, Cheng Y, Chen X, Wang G, Shi M, et al. Tumor-derived exosomal HMGB1 fosters hepatocellular carcinoma immune evasion by promoting TIM-1+ regulatory B cell expansion. J Immunother Cancer. (2018) 6:145. doi: 10.1186/s40425-018-0451-6, PMID: 30526680

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Rao Q, Zuo B, Lu Z, Gao X, You A, Wu C, et al. Tumor-derived exosomes elicit tumor suppression in murine hepatocellular carcinoma models and humans in vitro. Hepatology. (2016) 64:456–72. doi: 10.1002/hep.28549, PMID: 26990897

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Gordan JD, Kennedy EB, Abou-Alfa GK, Beal E, Finn RS, Gade TP, et al. Systemic therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: ASCO guideline update. J Clin Oncol. (2024) 42:1830–50. doi: 10.1200/JCO.23.02745, PMID: 38502889

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Yan Y, Hu J, Han N, Li HT, Yang X, Li LG, et al. Sorafenib-loaded metal-organic framework nanoparticles for anti-hepatocellular carcinoma effects through synergistically potentiating ferroptosis and remodeling tumor immune microenvironment. Mater Today Bio. (2025) 32:101848. doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2025.101848, PMID: 40487165

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Li W, Zhao B, Wang Q, Lu J, Wu X, and Chen X. M2 macrophage exosomes promote resistance to sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma cells via miR-200c-3p. Int Immunopharmacol. (2024) ;139::112807. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2024.112807, PMID: 39068757

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Wang G, Zhao W, Wang H, Qiu G, Jiang Z, Wei G, et al. Exosomal miR-744 inhibits proliferation and sorafenib chemoresistance in hepatocellular carcinoma by targeting PAX2. Med Sci Monit. (2019) 25::7209–7217. doi: 10.12659/MSM.919219, PMID: 31553714

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

57. de la Cruz-Ojeda P, Schmid T, Boix L, Moreno M, Sapena V, Praena-Fernández JM, et al. miR-200c-3p, miR-222-5p, and miR-512-3p Constitute a Biomarker Signature of Sorafenib Effectiveness in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Cells. (2022) 11:2673. doi: 10.3390/cells11172673, PMID: 36078082

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Cao M, Li Y, Su X, Tang Y, Ren Y, Luo J, et al. Exosome-derived lnc-FAM72D-3 promotes lenvatinib resistance by remodeling hepatocellular carcinoma cytoskeleton via MBNL1/FAK axis. Drug Resist Updat. (2025) 82:101271. doi: 10.1016/j.drup.2025.101271, PMID: 40517686

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

59. Cao M, Li Y, Su X, Tang Y, Yuan F, Ren Y, et al. Exosome-derived hsa_circ_0007132 promotes lenvatinib resistance by inhibiting the ubiquitin-mediated degradation of NONO. Noncoding RNA Res. (2025) 14:1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.ncrna.2025.05.007, PMID: 40521241

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

60. Yao X, Tang M, Li L, and Zeng Y. Role of S1PR1 in VEGF-exosomes mediated resistance of hepatocellular carcinoma to anti-angiogenesis therapy. Cancer Cell Int. (2025) 25:264. doi: 10.1186/s12935-025-03907-7, PMID: 40671013

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

61. Wei XC, Xia YR, Zhou P, Xue X, Ding S, Liu LJ, et al. Hepatitis B core antigen modulates exosomal miR-135a to target vesicle-associated membrane protein 2 promoting chemoresistance in hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. (2021) 27:8302–22. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i48.8302, PMID: 35068871

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

62. Wang J, Pu J, Zhang Y, Yao T, Luo Z, Li W, et al. Exosome-transmitted long non-coding RNA SENP3-EIF4A1 suppresses the progression of hepatocellular carcinoma. Aging (Albany NY). (2020) 12:11550–67. doi: 10.18632/aging.103302, PMID: 32602848

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

63. Deng P, Li M, and Wu Y. The Predictive Efficacy of Serum Exosomal microRNA-122 and microRNA-148a for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Based on Smart Healthcare. J Healthc Eng. (2022) 2022:5914541. doi: 10.1155/2022/5914541, PMID: 35028121

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

64. Suehiro T, Miyaaki H, Kanda Y, Shibata H, Honda T, Ozawa E, et al. Serum exosomal microRNA-122 and microRNA-21 as predictive biomarkers in transarterial chemoembolization-treated hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Oncol Lett. (2018) 16:3267–73. doi: 10.3892/ol.2018.8991, PMID: 30127924

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

65. Xue X, Zhao Y, Wang X, Qin L, and Hu R. Development and validation of serum exosomal microRNAs as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Cell Biochem. (2019) 120:135–42. doi: 10.1002/jcb.27165, PMID: 30238497

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

66. Rao D, Guan S, Huang J, Chang Q, and Duan S. miR-425-5p acts as a molecular marker and promoted proliferation, migration by targeting RNF11 in hepatocellular carcinoma. BioMed Res Int. (2020) 2020:6530973. doi: 10.1155/2020/6530973, PMID: 33123581

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

67. Wu H, Shang J, Zhan W, Liu J, Ning H, and Chen N. miR−425−5p promotes cell proliferation, migration and invasion by directly targeting FOXD3 in hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Mol Med Rep. (2019) 20:1883–92. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2019.10427, PMID: 31257522

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

68. Callegari E, D’Abundo L, Guerriero P, Simioni C, Elamin BK, Russo M, et al. miR-199a-3p modulates MTOR and PAK4 pathways and inhibits tumor growth in a hepatocellular carcinoma transgenic mouse model. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. (2018) 11:485–93. doi: 10.1016/j.omtn.2018.04.002, PMID: 29858083

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

69. Xu Y, Lai Y, Cao L, Li Y, Chen G, Chen L, et al. Human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells-derived exosomal microRNA-451a represses epithelial-mesenchymal transition of hepatocellular carcinoma cells by inhibiting ADAM10. RNA Biol. (2021) 18:1408–23. doi: 10.1080/15476286.2020.1851540, PMID: 33206588

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

70. Liu D, Kang H, Gao M, Jin L, Zhang F, Chen D, et al. Exosome-transmitted circ_MMP2 promotes hepatocellular carcinoma metastasis by upregulating MMP2. Mol Oncol. (2020) 14:1365–80. doi: 10.1002/1878-0261.12637, PMID: 31944556

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

71. Huang CS, Yu W, Cui H, Wang YJ, Zhang L, Han F, et al. Increased expression of miR-21 predicts poor prognosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. (2015) 8:7234–8., PMID: 26261620

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

72. Yang X, Zhang XF, Lu X, Jia HL, Liang L, Dong QZ, et al. MicroRNA-26a suppresses angiogenesis in human hepatocellular carcinoma by targeting hepatocyte growth factor-cMet pathway. Hepatology. (2014) 59:1874–85. doi: 10.1002/hep.26941, PMID: 24259426

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

73. Guan C, Yang F, He X, Li T, Yang Q, He H, et al. Clinical significance of microRNA-155 expression in hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncol Lett. (2016) 11:1574–80. doi: 10.3892/ol.2015.4048, PMID: 26893782

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

74. Chen L, Chu F, Cao Y, Shao J, and Wang F. Serum miR-182 and miR-331-3p as diagnostic and prognostic markers in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Tumour Biol. (2015) 36:7439–47. doi: 10.1007/s13277-015-3430-2, PMID: 25903466

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

75. Rui T, Zhang X, Guo J, Xiang A, Tang N, Liu J, et al. Serum-exosome-derived miRNAs serve as promising biomarkers for HCC diagnosis. Cancers (Basel). (2022) 15:205. doi: 10.3390/cancers15010205, PMID: 36612201

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

76. Wang Y, Zhang C, Zhang P, Guo G, Jiang T, Zhao X, et al. Serum exosomal microRNAs combined with alpha-fetoprotein as diagnostic markers of hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Med. (2018) 7:1670–9. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1390, PMID: 29573235

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

77. Ding X, Li L, Feng K, Zhang J, Sun B, Chu X, et al. Predictive effect and clinical diagnosis significance of exosome-related genes for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease-related hepatocellular carcinoma. Sci Rep. (2025) 15:23062. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-07286-x, PMID: 40595076

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

78. Semaan L, Zeng Q, Lu Y, Zhang Y, Zreik MM, Chamseddine MB, et al. MicroRNA-214 enriched exosomes from human cerebral endothelial cells (hCEC) sensitize hepatocellular carcinoma to anti-cancer drugs. Oncotarget. (2021) 12:185–98. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.27879, PMID: 33613846

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

79. Yuan L, Wang Y, Cheng J, Lin S, Ma A, Li K, et al. Cancer-derived exosomal circTMEM56 enhances the efficacy of HCC radiotherapy through the miR-136-5p/STING axis. Cancer Biol Med. (2025) 22:396–411. doi: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2024.0544, PMID: 40269559

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

80. Lee SM, Cho J, Choi S, Kim DH, Ryu JW, Kim I, et al. HDAC5-mediated exosomal Maspin and miR-151a-3p as biomarkers for enhancing radiation treatment sensitivity in hepatocellular carcinoma. Biomater Res. (2023) 27:134. doi: 10.1186/s40824-023-00467-7, PMID: 38102691

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

81. Yin Z, Yu M, Ma T, Zhang C, Huang S, Karimzadeh MR, et al. Mechanisms underlying low-clinical responses to PD-1/PD-L1 blocking antibodies in immunotherapy of cancer: a key role of exosomal PD-L1. J Immunother Cancer. (2021) 9:e001698. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2020-001698, PMID: 33472857

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

82. Cheng L, Liu J, Liu Q, Liu Y, Fan L, Wang F, et al. Exosomes from melatonin treated hepatocellularcarcinoma cells alter the immunosupression status through STAT3 pathway in macrophages. Int J Biol Sci. (2017) 13:723–34. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.19642, PMID: 28655998

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

83. Lou G, Chen L, Xia C, Wang W, Qi J, Li A, et al. MiR-199a-modified exosomes from adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells improve hepatocellular carcinoma chemosensitivity through mTOR pathway. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. (2020) 39:4. doi: 10.1186/s13046-019-1512-5, PMID: 31898515

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

84. Li X, Yu Q, Zhao R, Guo X, Liu C, Zhang K, et al. Designer exosomes for targeted delivery of a novel therapeutic cargo to enhance sorafenib-mediated ferroptosis in hepatocellular carcinoma. Front Oncol. (2022) 12:898156. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.898156, PMID: 35814401

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

85. Tajik T, Baghaei K, Moghadam VE, Farrokhi N, and Salami SA. Extracellular vesicles of cannabis with high CBD content induce anticancer signaling in human hepatocellular carcinoma. BioMed Pharmacother. (2022) 152:113209. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2022.113209, PMID: 35667235

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

86. Xiao W, Dong W, Zhang C, Saren G, Geng P, Zhao H, et al. Effects of the epigenetic drug MS-275 on the release and function of exosome-related immune molecules in hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Eur J Med Res. (2013) 18:61. doi: 10.1186/2047-783X-18-61, PMID: 24359553

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

87. Li J, Lin W, Huang T, Chen M, and Lin Q. IL-12 improves the anti-HCC efficacy of dendritic cells loaded with exosomes from overexpressing Rab27a tumor cells. Exp Cell Res. (2024) 439:114073. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2024.114073, PMID: 38704079

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

88. Zuo B, Zhang Y, Zhao K, Wu L, Qi H, Yang R, et al. Universal immunotherapeutic strategy for hepatocellular carcinoma with exosome vaccines that engage adaptive and innate immune responses. J Hematol Oncol. (2022) 15:46. doi: 10.1186/s13045-022-01266-8, PMID: 35488312

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

89. Lu Z, Zuo B, Jing R, Gao X, Rao Q, Liu Z, et al. Dendritic cell-derived exosomes elicit tumor regression in autochthonous hepatocellular carcinoma mouse models. J Hepatol. (2017) 67:739–48. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.05.019, PMID: 28549917

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

90. Zuo B, Qi H, Lu Z, Chen L, Sun B, Yang R, et al. Alarmin-painted exosomes elicit persistent antitumor immunity in large established tumors in mice. Nat Commun. (2020) 11:1790. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15569-2, PMID: 32286296

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

91. Huang S, Xiong M, Liu J, Wang J, Han X, Chen Z, et al. Exosomes with IR780 and Lenvatinib loaded on GPC3 single-chain scFv antibodies for targeted hyperthermia and chemotherapy in hepatocellular carcinoma therapy. Am J Cancer Res. (2023) 13:5368–81., PMID: 38058824

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

92. Kamerkar S, Leng C, Burenkova O, Jang SC, McCoy C, Zhang K, et al. Exosome-mediated genetic reprogramming of tumor-associated macrophages by exoASO-STAT6 leads to potent monotherapy antitumor activity. Sci Adv. (2022) 8:eabj7002. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abj7002, PMID: 35179953

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

93. Baldari S, Di Rocco G, Magenta A, Picozza M, and Toietta G. Extracellular vesicles-encapsulated microRNA-125b produced in genetically modified mesenchymal stromal cells inhibits hepatocellular carcinoma cell proliferation. Cells. (2019) 8:1560. doi: 10.3390/cells8121560, PMID: 31816923

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

94. Ahn SH, Ryu SW, Choi H, You S, Park J, and Choi C. Manufacturing therapeutic exosomes: from bench to industry. Mol Cells. (2022) 45:284–90. doi: 10.14348/molcells.2022.2033, PMID: 35534190

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

95. Kimiz-Gebologlu I and Oncel SS. Exosomes: Large-scale production, isolation, drug loading efficiency, and biodistribution and uptake. J Control Release. (2022) 347:533–43. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.05.027, PMID: 35597405

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: biomarkers, exosomes, hepatocellular carcinoma, intercellular communication, therapeutic targets

Citation: Xu Q, Chen J, Liu Y, Yu J, Zhao F and Shu Q (2026) Exosomal crosstalk: the metastatic language of hepatocellular carcinoma. Front. Immunol. 16:1701305. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1701305

Received: 08 September 2025; Accepted: 12 December 2025; Revised: 28 November 2025;
Published: 06 January 2026.

Edited by:

Shenglong Li, Dalian University of Technology, China

Reviewed by:

Prof Dwijendra K. Gupta, Allahabad University, India
Yingpu Li, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, China
Dr Anirban Ganguly, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Deoghar, India

Copyright © 2026 Xu, Chen, Liu, Yu, Zhao and Shu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Qijin Shu, MTk5NTMwMTFAemNtdS5lZHUuY24=

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.