Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Immunol.

Sec. Microbial Immunology

This article is part of the Research TopicAdvancing Enteric Disease Treatments: Probiotics and Antimicrobial StrategiesView all articles

Effects of Lactobacillus plantarum ZG-7 on the intestinal barrier and intestinal flora of Muscovy ducks infected with avian pathogenic Escherichia coli

Provisionally accepted
Song  PengSong Peng1Bilin  XieBilin Xie2Guiheng  MeiGuiheng Mei3Yaxiong  MaYaxiong Ma3Xin  LinXin Lin3Mengshi  ZhaoMengshi Zhao1Fengqiang  LinFengqiang Lin1Zhaolong  LiZhaolong Li1*
  • 1Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Fuzhou, China
  • 2Putian Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Putian, China
  • 3Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Avian pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC) poses a serious challenge to global poultry production, where it causes enteritis, septicemia, and high mortality, resulting in substantial economic losses. Although antibiotics have been traditionally used to control APEC, the rise of antimicrobial resistance and concerns over drug residues underscore the need for effective and sustainable alternatives. Probiotics have emerged as promising candidates because of their ability to modulate the intestinal microbiota, strengthen host immunity, and preserve epithelial barrier integrity. In this study, we investigated the protective role of Lactobacillus plantarum ZG-7 against APEC infection in Muscovy ducks. 40 one-day-old ducks (equal numbers of males and females) were randomly allocated to five groups (n = 8 per group): control (CON), probiotic alone (LP), APEC-infected (EC), probiotic-pretreated APEC-infected (LPEC), and colistin sulfate-treated APEC-infected (CSEC), with the latter serving as a positive control and exhibiting expected protective effects. On day 7, ducks in the EC and LPEC groups received two oral doses of pathogenic E. coli O78 (3 × 10^9 CFU/mL, 0.2 mL) at an 8-hour interval, while ducks in the CON and LP groups received sterile saline. Serum and intestinal samples were collected on day 15. APEC infection significantly reduced average daily gain during days 9–15 and across the trial. Histopathological analysis showed epithelial disruption, crypt and gland loss, reduced goblet cells, diminished mucus secretion, and decreased expression of tight junction proteins (ZO-1, MUC2, Occludin). In contrast, L. plantarum ZG-7 treatment alleviated intestinal injury and restored growth performance. 16S rRNA sequencing further revealed that APEC challenge increased the abundance of unclassified Lachnospiraceae, Lachnoclostridium, norank RF39 group, and Paludicola (P < 0.05), whereas L. plantarum ZG-7 treatment reduced these taxa. Moreover, probiotic supplementation alone significantly enriched This is a provisional file, not the final typeset article Bacteroides (P < 0.001). Taken together, these results demonstrate that L. plantarum ZG-7 helps maintain a beneficial microbial composition, protects epithelial barrier function, and mitigates the adverse effects of APEC infection in Muscovy ducks, highlighting its potential as a natural and sustainable alternative for improving poultry health.

Keywords: Lactobacillus plantarum ZG-71, Avian pathogenic Escherichia coli2, Intestinalbarrier3, Cecal microbiota 4, Muscovy duck 5

Received: 09 Sep 2025; Accepted: 11 Dec 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Peng, Xie, Mei, Ma, Lin, Zhao, Lin and Li. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Zhaolong Li

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.