Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

REVIEW article

Front. Immunol., 15 January 2026

Sec. Cancer Immunity and Immunotherapy

Volume 16 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2025.1706379

This article is part of the Research TopicCancer Immunity, Modern Radiotherapy and Immunotherapy: A Journey into Cancer Treatment InnovationView all 18 articles

Regulatory effects of traditional Chinese medicine on the breast-cancer immune microenvironment

Ting Liu&#x;Ting Liu1†Jingying Shang&#x;Jingying Shang1†Jiameng WangJiameng Wang1Lutuo HanLutuo Han1Mingyue YangMingyue Yang2Ruonan LiRuonan Li1Baoyi NiBaoyi Ni1Jiakang Jiang*Jiakang Jiang3*
  • 1Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, Harbin, China
  • 2The Second Affiliated Hospital of Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, Harbin, China
  • 3The First Affiliated Hospital of Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, Harbin, China

Breast cancer (BC) is the most common malignant tumor in women, driven by various factors. Its incidence has been rising annually and has become an urgent global public health challenge. An increasing body of evidence suggests that the immune microenvironment (IME) of breast cancer plays a crucial role in tumor initiation, progression, and metastasis. Through multi-target and multi-pathway regulatory effects, Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) demonstrates unique potential in reshaping the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME). This narrative review aims to systematically organize and summarize recent mechanistic advancements, elucidating how Traditional Chinese Medicine (primarily based on Chinese herbal medicine) regulates the function and polarization of key immune cells, controls immune checkpoints and cytokine networks, thereby inhibiting tumor immune escape, enhancing anti-tumor immunity, and exerting anti-BC effects. Despite the promising prospects, the application of TCM in BC immunotherapy still faces numerous challenges, including tumor heterogeneity, dosage complexity, and safety issues. Future research should focus on large-scale, multi-center clinical trials combining contemporary immunotherapy strategies, aiming to achieve better clinical outcomes in BC treatment and provide insights for immunotherapy of other cancer types.

1 Introduction

Breast cancer (BC) is the most frequently diagnosed malignancy in women and the second leading cause of cancer worldwide; according to the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), more than 2.3 million new cases were recorded in 2022, representing 11.6% of all cancers (1). The global distribution of BC reflects a complex interplay of genetic, environmental and lifestyle factors. Incidence rates are generally higher in high-income countries than in low- and middle-income regions; however, absolute numbers of BC cases are rising in many developing nations owing to population growth and the adoption of Western lifestyles (2). Encouragingly, BC mortality is expected to decline as women gain broader access to advanced preventive measures, early diagnosis and medical intervention (3). Deciphering BC pathogenesis remains a central scientific priority, with recent investigations spanning tumor stemness, the intratumoral microbiome and circadian rhythms. Current evidence indicates that genetic susceptibility, hormonal exposure, nulliparity and unhealthy lifestyles cooperate to convert normal cells into malignant counterparts through stages of hyperplasia, premalignant lesions and carcinoma in situ (4).

The initiation, progression and metastasis of BC are intimately linked to its immune microenvironment (IME). The IME not only shapes tumor immune-evasion mechanisms but also actively modulates tumor progression (5). Tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) play a pivotal role in BC immune surveillance, and their composition and function exert major prognostic influence (6). Principal immune infiltrates comprise T cells, dendritic cells (DCs), tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), natural killer cells (NKs) and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) (7). The immune system can display dual roles by suppressing or promoting tumor growth (8). In BC, effector T cells and NK cells usually act anti-tumorally, constraining tumor expansion by recognizing and eliminating malignant cells (9, 10). However, immunosuppressive constituents of the tumor milieu—such as TAMs and MDSCs—secrete inhibitory mediators (e.g., IL-10 and TGF-β) that dampen anti-tumor immunity, thereby driving immune escape and metastasis (11, 12). TAMs are especially significant: via M2 polarization they enhance tumor growth, angiogenesis and immune evasion (13, 14). MDSCs facilitate invasion and dissemination by suppressing T-cell and NK-cell functionality (12). Remodeling of the IME is closely associated with the clinical prognosis of BC (15). The cellular composition and functional status of the IME decisively influence immune-escape mechanisms, metastatic capacity and therapeutic responsiveness (16). Consequently, re-establishing immune surveillance through IME modulation has become an important strategy in BC immunotherapy.

Prolonged clinical practice and abundant literature have shown that traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) enhances antitumor immunity, improves quality of life and prolongs median survival in cancer patients, underscoring its vast potential in tumor-immune modulation. TCM is a comprehensive therapeutic system that encompasses various treatment methods, including herbal medicine, acupuncture, moxibustion, and others. In this paper, we primarily discuss the role of herbal medicine in modulating the IME of BC. Although TCM treatments such as acupuncture show potential in certain aspects of immune regulation, they fall outside the scope of this discussion. TCM has a long history in treating BC; “Ru-yan” described in the classic text Furen Daquan Liangfang mirrors today’s clinical features of BC and was attributed to Liver–Spleen qi stagnation and qi-blood deficiency. In TCM theory, BC arises from qi stagnation, phlegm coagulation, blood stasis and toxic heat; therapy follows the principle of “supporting the upright and dispelling the evil,” emphasizing holistic, pattern-based regulation by tonifying qi, invigorating blood, resolving stasis, detoxifying, strengthening the Spleen and soothing the Liver to re-establish homeostasis (17). Contemporary studies further substantiate the therapeutic advantages of TCM in BC. For example, the classical formulas Yanghe Tang and Xihuang Wan have been shown to suppress tumor growth, modulate immunity and inhibit metastasis (18, 19). Moreover, Huangqi Sijunzi Tang confers pronounced benefits in BC patients with Spleen-Qi-deficiency-type cancer-related fatigue (CRF), alleviating clinical symptoms and markedly reducing physical, affective and cognitive fatigue scores (20). TCM likewise exhibits unique strengths in the prevention and treatment of precancerous lesions. Yanghe Huayan Decoction, one of the most widely used prescriptions for BC, has been proven capable of reversing breast carcinogenesis (21).

In summary, The TIME of BC is a complex network influenced by multiple factors, which enhances the adaptability of multi-target treatment approaches. Based on this, this review presents and argues a central thesis: the inherent multi-component, multi-target approach of TCM endows it with unique potential for systematically modulating this complex network.

2 Research objectives and methods

2.1 Research objectives

This review aims to systematically organize and describe recent advances in the mechanisms and research progress of TCM (primarily focusing on Chinese herbs) in modulating the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) of BC. As a narrative review, its primary goal is to provide a comprehensive knowledge framework and an overview of the current state of the field, specifically including:

1. To summarize and categorize the potential targets, pathways, and key mechanisms through which TCM modulates the TIME of BC.

2. To integrate and present multi-level evidence from basic research to clinical translation.

3. To explore and forecast the potential of combining TCM with modern immunotherapies and the future research directions.

2.2 Literature search strategy

To comprehensively gather relevant literature, we conducted a systematic search across multiple databases:

Databases searched: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase.

Search period: April 2009 to November 2025.

Search keywords: (“breast cancer” OR “mammary carcinoma”) AND (“tumor immune microenvironment” OR “immunomodulation” OR “immune escape”) AND (“traditional Chinese medicine” OR “herbal medicine” OR “Chinese herbal formula”).

2.3 Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

1. The study topic involves the modulation of the BC IME by TCM (single herbs, formulations, or active ingredients).

2. Experimental studies (in vivo or in vitro), clinical studies (any design), and relevant mechanistic reviews.

3. The publication language is English.

4. The study provides clear data on mechanisms, outcomes, or clinical endpoints.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Non-BC studies.

2. Studies not involving the IME or immune modulation mechanisms.

3. Conference abstracts, reviews, news articles, or non-research articles.

4. Incomplete data or inaccessible full text.

2.4 Literature selection and content synthesis process

This review adopts a narrative synthesis approach, with the following process:

1. Preliminary screening: Studies that do not meet the inclusion criteria are excluded based on titles and abstracts.

2. Full-text evaluation: Relevant literature is read in full and screened according to the inclusion/exclusion criteria.

3. Information extraction and theme construction: Key information (e.g., author, year, interventions, models/populations, main findings, mechanisms) is extracted from the final included studies. As a narrative review, this paper does not conduct formal quality scoring or bias risk assessment of the studies but aims to systematically describe and integrate the existing evidence through thematic synthesis (e.g., “immune cell regulation,” “signaling pathways,” “clinical combinatorial applications”), and identify knowledge gaps. Throughout the description, important limitations in study design (e.g., small sample size, non-randomized design) are pointed out.

4. Content organization: Based on the extracted information, the paper is organized in a logical sequence from basic mechanisms to clinical translation, constructing a coherent narrative flow to comprehensively reflect the current status and trends in the field.

3 The immune microenvironment and immune escape mechanisms in breast cancer

3.1 Basic composition of the immune microenvironment

Tumor cells, along with various immune cells, constitute the TIME, which includes tumor-associated immune cells, cytokines, and immune checkpoint molecules. This microenvironment has long been shown to be closely associated with tumor growth, recurrence, and metastasis (22, 23). Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes are central to immune regulation: Cytotoxic (CD8+) T cells eliminate tumor cells by recognizing abnormal tumor antigens on cancer cells; CD4+ T cells differentiate into multiple subsets that coordinate various anti-tumor responses; and regulatory T cells (Tregs) exert anti-tumor immune effects through various mechanisms. For example, Tregs secrete growth factors such as TGF-β, which not only directly sustain tumor cell survival and proliferation but also promote tumor angiogenesis and broadly suppress anti-tumor immunity, thereby promoting tumor development (2325). Within the tumor, infiltrating B cells can form tertiary lymphoid structures, present antigens to T cells, generate anti-tumor antibodies, and secrete cytokines to promote cytotoxic immunity. In contrast, regulatory B cells enhance immune suppression by secreting cytokines and transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) (26). Innate lymphocytes provide an additional level of control: NK cells mediate MHC-independent lysis without damaging healthy allogeneic tissues, while γδ T cells possess characteristics of both innate and adaptive immunity. They can express or upregulate a large number of innate receptors under stimulation by IL-2 or IL-15, thereby conferring NK-like cytotoxic effects (27, 28). Among myeloid immune cells, M1 and M2 macrophages have opposing effects on tumors. M1 macrophages generate reactive oxygen species (ROS) and pro-inflammatory cytokines, playing a critical role in tumor cell killing, while M2 macrophages secrete IL-10 and TGF-β, promoting tumor progression (29, 30). Soluble mediators such as IFN-α, IFN-γ, IL-2, IL-12, IL-15, and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) slow tumor growth by directly inhibiting cell proliferation and inducing cell death, or indirectly by enhancing anti-tumor immunity (31, 32). Immune checkpoint receptors such as PD-1, CTLA-4, LAG-3, and TIGIT, along with their ligands PD-L1 and CD80/86, constitute “brake” mechanisms that can be targeted by drugs (33). The synergistic interactions of components within the TIME influence tumor initiation, progression, and even resistance to treatment, thereby offering new avenues for cancer immunotherapy.

3.2 Immune escape mechanisms in breast cancer

BC evades immune surveillance through multiple mechanisms, including the establishment of an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, activation of immune checkpoints, and suppression of tumor antigen presentation (34). Specifically, BC creates a highly immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME) to evade host immune surveillance. Hypoxia in the TME upregulates PD-L1 expression via HIF-1α, which suppresses the proliferation of cytotoxic T cells and promotes immune escape (35, 36). Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) recruit cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) into the TME, forming an immunosuppressive environment that restricts intratumoral CD8+ T cell infiltration and increases resistance to immunotherapy (3739). Immune checkpoint activation plays a central role in this escape process. The programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) pathway—comprising PD-1 and its ligand PD-L1—facilitates immune escape of BC cells by inhibiting T cell activation through receptor–ligand interaction (40). Clinical studies have shown that combining PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors with chemotherapy significantly improves survival in PD-L1-positive patients with locally advanced or metastatic triple-negative BC (TNBC) (41). Immunosuppressive cell populations also play critical roles in BC immune escape. T cells progressively convert into suppressive regulatory T cells (Tregs), which inhibit effector T cell activity and accelerate BC development and progression (42). Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) impair the functions of T cells, dendritic cells (DCs), and NK cells by generating ROS, depleting arginine via arginase, and releasing immunosuppressive cytokines. High MDSC levels are therefore strongly associated with poor prognosis in metastatic BC (43). In addition, indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO1) promotes tumor immune tolerance and progression by converting tryptophan into kynurenine and increasing levels of immunosuppressive cells such as T cells and MDSCs (44). In summary, the immune escape mechanisms of BC are highly complex and heterogeneous, necessitating ongoing research and refinement of conceptual frameworks.

3.3 Heterogeneity of the immune microenvironment in different breast cancer subtypes

BC is a malignant tumor with high molecular heterogeneity, and its subtypes are clinically classified based on the expression of hormone receptors (ER), progesterone receptors (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). Different subtypes also exhibit significant differences in their TIME. TNBC typically has the most active immune microenvironment, often accompanied by a large accumulation of TILs. However, its genomic instability and higher somatic mutation burden make it more prone to immune escape and distant metastasis (45). In the TIME of this subtype, CD8+ T cells and regulatory Tregs play key roles (46). HER2-positive BC (HER2+) is one of the subtypes with the highest degree of immune cell infiltration. Its immune microenvironment undergoes significant dynamic changes under the combined influence of factors such as TILs, microsatellite instability, and tertiary lymphoid structures, particularly during HER2-targeted therapy, where such changes may lead to the development of resistance (47, 48). In contrast, the immune microenvironment of ER-positive BC (ER+) is typically in a suppressed state, with low levels of TILs. It may inhibit T cell function by expressing immune checkpoint molecules such as PD-L1, thereby weakening the anti-tumor immune response (49). In recent years, antibody-drug conjugates have emerged as a novel strategy for treating ER+ BC. By reducing immunogenic responses, they offer a new solution to overcome HER2 heterogeneity and resistance issues (50). Overall, the heterogeneity of the IME among different BC subtypes significantly affects the response to immunotherapy and clinical management of the disease. In the future, treatment strategies should be further optimized based on the immune characteristics of each subtype, promoting the development of personalized precision therapies.

4 Systematic modulation of the immune microenvironment of breast cancer by traditional Chinese medicine

In recent years, TCM has emerged as a powerful tool for modulating the TIME, primarily by enhancing immune cell activity and inhibiting immune suppressive factors to strengthen anti-tumor immunity (51). This is primarily due to the unique advantages of TCM, which involves multi-target and multi-pathway mechanisms, and its ability to enhance systemic anti-tumor capacity through multifaceted immune modulation, thereby demonstrating potential as an adjunctive therapy for conventional BC treatment (Figure 1, Table 1).

Figure 1
The regulatory effect of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) on the main components of the Tumor Immune Microenvironment (TIME) in Breast Cancer (BC). The diagram is divided into three sections: Immune Cells, Immune Checkpoints, and Cytokines. It shows NK cells, dendritic cells (DCs), and T cells with upward arrows indicating activation. Checkpoints CTLA-4 and PD-1 are marked with downward arrows, indicating inhibition. Cytokines IL-2, IFN-γ, and IL-12 are accompanied by upward arrows representing activation, while TGF-β is shown with a downward arrow indicating suppression. In the center, a graphic symbolizes TCM treatment for breast cancer.

Figure 1. The regulatory effect of TCM on the main components of the TIME in BC. ↑Indicates promote; ↓indicates inhibit. Created in BioRender (https://BioRender.com).

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Systematic regulation of breast cancer (BC) immune microenvironment by traditional chinese medicine (TCM).

4.1 Modulation of immune cells in the breast cancer immune microenvironment by traditional Chinese medicine

The immune modulation potential of TCM has increasingly gained attention, especially the irreplaceable roles of key immune cells such as T cells, NK cells, and dendritic cells in the BC IME. Studies have shown that TCM can promote the activation and differentiation of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, which are crucial for effective anti-tumor immunity. For example, the formula Yang Yin Fu Zheng Tang (YFJP), composed of Codonopsis pilosula, Adenophora triphylla, and Astragalus membranaceus, promotes the proliferation of CD3+ and CD8+ T cells in the peripheral blood and tumor tissues of C57BL/6 mice, and restores T cell cytotoxicity by downregulating inhibitory receptors such as PD-1, TIGIT, and TIM-3, thereby inhibiting tumor progression (52). Notably, Astragalus contains a variety of active components, such as polysaccharides, saponins, and flavonoids, all of which have been shown to possess immune-regulatory and anti-tumor effects. In the TNBC mouse model, Astragalus polysaccharides increase the infiltration of CD8+ T cells into the tumor tissue, triggering an anti-tumor immune response (53). Chaihu saponin A, an active component derived from the root of Bupleurum, has been shown to increase the infiltration of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells into BC tumors, thereby enhancing anti-BC immunity (17). Experiments in SD rats have verified that this effect is mediated through the activation of the IL-12/STAT4 pathway, which upregulates IFN-γ and IL-12, while reducing IL-4 and IL-10, thereby shifting the Th1/Th2 balance towards a Th1-type immune response (54). TCM also enhances NK cell cytotoxicity and prevents tumor immune escape. For example, ginsenoside Rh2 (GRh2) directly binds with ERp5 in MDA-MB-231x cells and modulates the NKG2D-MICA signaling axis to enhance NK cell activity, slowing the development and metastasis of BC (55). In the 4T1 mouse BC cell experiment, GanoOil significantly enhances NK cell and CD8+ T cell activity and promotes IL-6 secretion, playing an indispensable role in the treatment of BC lung metastasis (56). Moreover, a cohort study involving 844 HER2-positive BC patients showed that combined intervention with Xianling Lianxia Formula (XLLXF) on top of conventional treatment significantly increased the proportion and absolute count of NK cells in peripheral blood. The five-year survival rate in the combination therapy group (96.3%) was also improved compared to the trastuzumab-only group (88.7%). Further cellular and animal experiments revealed that XLLXF may alleviate the tumor microenvironment’s suppression of immune function by activating the AKT1/STAT5 signaling axis and downregulating the expression of CISH protein, ultimately enhancing NK cell anti-tumor activity (57). Network pharmacology analysis suggested that the tumor-immunomodulatory effects of XLLXF may be related to its active ingredients such as curcumin and icariin-II, providing a potential molecular theoretical basis for understanding how this formulation enhances NK cell function and improves patient survival prognosis (58). Dendritic cells are key to initiating adaptive immune responses, as they present antigens to T cells and trigger immune responses (59). In vitro experiments demonstrated that the main active ingredient of pagoda tree, pagoda tree polysaccharides, promotes dendritic cell maturation and function through the PI3K/Akt1 pathway, and inhibits p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) expression, thereby enhancing dendritic cell-mediated T cell activation and boosting anti-BC immunity (60). Further in vivo experiments confirmed that pagoda tree polysaccharides stimulate anti-tumor immune responses by increasing the proportion of mature dendritic cells, thereby prolonging the tumor-free survival time of xenografted mice and delaying TNBC progression (61). Advanced studies have shown that components extracted from Plantago polysaccharides (PLP) promote the maturation of dendritic cells in 4T1 mice, accelerate the production of IL-12 p70 and TNF-α, and indirectly stimulate lymphocyte proliferation, thereby triggering anti-tumor responses (62). Overall, TCM demonstrates significant immune modulation potential in the BC IME, exerting its unique anti-tumor effects by enhancing T cell activation, NK cell cytotoxicity, and dendritic cell function.

4.2 Modulation of immune mediators in the breast cancer immune microenvironment by traditional Chinese medicine

TCM can also enhance anti-tumor immune responses by modulating key immune mediators, such as cytokines and immune checkpoint molecules, offering promising prospects for BC immunotherapy.

4.2.1 Modulation of cytokines

Cytokines such as IL-2, IL-12, IFN-γ, and TGF-β play key roles in tumor immune responses (63). However, the production of these cytokines is often suppressed, leading to immune escape (64). Both single compounds and multi-herb formulations in TCM can regulate the secretion and activity of these cytokines, thereby enhancing anti-tumor immunity (65). TCM has been reported to increase IL-2 secretion, promoting T cell proliferation and activation (66). For example, a study on BALB/c female nude mice confirmed that 4 weeks of continuous XLLXF administration significantly increased the levels of key cytokines such as IL-2 and IL-15 in peripheral serum, thereby enhancing T cell-mediated anti-tumor immune responses and ultimately inhibiting in vivo BC cell growth (58). IL-12 is critical for Th1 differentiation and the induction of IFN-γ (67). In vitro studies have demonstrated that Matrine promotes the release of cytokines such as IL-12 and TNF-α by regulating the TLR7/8 signaling pathway in dendritic cells, thereby promoting the Th1 immune response (68). This regulatory effect enhances the cytotoxic function of NK cells and CTLs, promoting tumor clearance (69). IFN-γ also plays an important role in anti-tumor immunity. In vivo experiments have confirmed that Glycyrrhizin polysaccharide-1 (GPS-1) significantly enhances anti-tumor immunity in chicks: on one hand, it increases cellular immunity, as evidenced by increased IFN-γ secretion and higher proportions of CD3+ and CD4+ T cells in serum; on the other hand, it enhances humoral immunity, leading to significant increases in IgG and IgA concentrations (70). Additionally, a key active ingredient in the herbal medicine Astragalus, Astragalus polysaccharides, can restore the Th1/Th2 immune balance in BALB/c mice carrying breast tumors by enhancing IFN-γ and related mediators, which is a crucial component of anti-breast cancer defense (71). TGF-β, as an immunosuppressive and anti-inflammatory cytokine, plays an irreplaceable role in tumor progression (72). In early tumor immune responses, TGF-β enhances anti-tumor immunity by regulating the differentiation and function of Tregs. Studies have shown that in the 4T1 mouse model, a key active ingredient extracted from Isodon rubescens, Isodon rubescens alkaloid, can inhibit Treg differentiation by reducing TGF-β secretion, thereby exerting an anti-breast cancer immunosuppressive effect (73). However, as the tumor progresses to advanced stages, TGF-β exhibits a clear dual role: it promotes cancer progression through various mechanisms such as inducing epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), regulating the expression of corresponding transcription factors, and promoting immune escape (74). This suggests that TGF-β has dual roles in different immune environments, and the specific mechanisms require further in-depth research to uncover its potential clinical applications and challenges in tumor therapy.

4.2.2 Regulation of immune checkpoint molecules

Immune checkpoints such as programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) are key regulators of immune tolerance, and tumors exploit these molecules to evade immune surveillance (75). In recent years, TCM has been shown to modulate these checkpoints, thereby enhancing immune surveillance against BC (76). The PD-1/PD-L1 axis, comprising PD-1 and its ligand PD-L1, facilitates tumor immune escape by inhibiting T cell activation (77). In vivo studies in mice have shown that berberine downregulates PD-1 on T cells and PD-L1 on tumor cells, promotes the production of IFN-γ and granzyme B, thereby enhancing T cell activation and proliferation, and ultimately reactivating the TIME (78). This regulatory effect can enhance the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and restore immune surveillance in BC (79). Combination therapy using neoiso-flavones and PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies not only enhances the sensitivity of 4T1 mice to these antibodies but also promotes CD4+ and CD8+ T cell infiltration and boosts the expression of immune effector molecules such as IFN-γ, thus remodeling the BC TIME (80). Similarly, CTLA-4–targeted immunotherapy has been widely applied in BC treatment (81). Studies have shown that certain TCM components can reduce CTLA-4 expression, thereby promoting T cell activation and enhancing anti-tumor immunity (65). In the MC38 tumor model, co-administration of cordycepin and anti-CTLA-4 agents further reduced CTLA-4 levels and accelerated T cell–mediated tumor clearance (82). By finely modulating these immune checkpoints, TCM can overcome tumor-induced immunosuppression and enhance the efficacy of immunotherapy (83). Through the modulation of immune mediators, TCM exerts anti-tumor activity and offers novel and promising avenues for BC immunotherapy.

4.2.3 Unique advantages of traditional Chinese medicine

Compared with conventional biologics (e.g., abatacept or monoclonal antibodies) and JAK inhibitors (e.g., baricitinib or tofacitinib), TCM presents several notable advantages. These agents typically target a single immune pathway or checkpoint, which may lead to acquired resistance or immune escape over time (84, 85). Furthermore, long-term use may induce immune-related adverse events such as fever or rash, and some patients exhibit limited clinical benefit (86). In contrast, TCM operates via multi-component, multi-target, and multi-pathway mechanisms, enabling the coordinated modulation of various immune cells and mediators within the IME, ultimately reshaping the TIME (87). Moreover, under the TCM principle of “syndrome differentiation and individualized treatment,” prescriptions are tailored to each patient. This personalized approach tends to result in fewer side effects and allows for synergistic application alongside other immunotherapies—such as immune checkpoint inhibitors or adoptive cell therapy—thereby enhancing efficacy while reducing treatment-related toxicity (88). In conclusion, TCM represents a promising adjuvant approach for BC immunotherapy, offering patients additional treatment options. When combined with modern immunotherapeutic strategies, it often demonstrates superior outcomes compared to conventional Western monotherapies.

5 Mechanistic insights into TCM-mediated modulation of the breast cancer immune microenvironment

TCM exerts anti-tumor activity by remodeling the local IME, modulating systemic immune responses, and suppressing tumor cell proliferation, thereby offering a novel therapeutic avenue for patients with BC (51, 89). However, unlike single-target agents, the precise mechanisms of TCM remain incompletely elucidated, largely due to its multi-component nature and involvement in complex signaling networks (90, 91). This section provides a detailed analysis of these mechanisms, aiming to elucidate the scientific basis of TCM’s multi-target characteristics (Figure 2, Table 2).

Figure 2
This schematic illustrates the regulatory effect of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) on the Breast Cancer Tumor Immune Microenvironment (BC TIME). TCM is categorized into single compounds and compound formulae. The diagram highlights multiple targets and pathways, including NF-κB, JAK/STAT, MAPK, among others. TCM modulates myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), enhances T-cell activity, promotes dendritic cell maturation, and increases natural killer cell cytotoxicity, while also regulating tumor-associated macrophages and facilitating their repolarization from the M2 to the M1 phenotype. This process aims to reduce immune escape of breast cancer cells, remodel the BC TIME, and enhance therapeutic efficacy, thereby supporting modern immunotherapy.

Figure 2. Mechanistic studies of TCM in modulating the BC TIME. ↑Indicates promote; ↓indicates inhibit. Created in BioRender (https://BioRender.com).

Table 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Mechanistic studies of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) in modulating the breast cancer (BC) immune microenvironment.

5.1 Mechanistic actions of bioactive components in traditional Chinese medicine

Bioactive flavonoids, saponins, and terpenoids derived from TCM play pivotal roles in modulating the TIME of BC (92). These compounds exert their effects via multiple pathways, regulating immune cell functions while suppressing tumor growth and metastasis (93). For example, flavonoids such as quercetin, resveratrol, astragaloside IV, and isoliquiritigenin exhibit antioxidant, anti-angiogenic, and immunomodulatory properties, and are widely utilized in oncology (94). In experiments utilizing 4T1 cells and 4T1 murine models, quercetin was shown to exert antitumor effects by modulating the BC TIME through suppression of the IL-6/JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway, resulting in reduced Treg cell populations (95). Resveratrol demonstrates multiple mechanisms against TNBC. Firstly, its anti-estrogenic activity directly inhibits the proliferation of ER-negative tumor cells. Secondly, in vivo studies revealed that resveratrol suppresses pulmonary metastasis by modulating the TIME—specifically by downregulating PD-1 expression on T cells in metastatic lung foci and promoting M1-type polarization of macrophages, thereby enhancing antitumor immunity and reducing immune evasion (96). In animal studies, co-delivery of hydroxymatrine and astragaloside IV via liposomes in combination with PD-1 inhibitors exhibited potent synergistic antitumor effects. The tumor inhibition rate (61.20%) and median survival (46 days) were 2.67 and 1.70 times higher, respectively, compared to the PD-1 monotherapy group (21.43%, 27 days). This synergistic mechanism was further validated in vitro, where the combination therapy significantly upregulated the expression of IFN-γ and granzyme B in CD8+ TILs, thereby systemically enhancing anti-BC immune responses (97). In studies targeting TNBC cell lines, isoliquiritigenin suppressed the IRF5/SLC7A5/IDO1 signaling axis, downregulating the expression of the key transcription factor IRF5 and significantly reducing the production of the tryptophan metabolite kynurenine. This modulation ultimately altered T cell immune functions, inhibiting TNBC progression and metastasis (98). Saponins, such as ginsenosides and paeoniflorin, modulate immune responses by enhancing macrophage phagocytic activity, promoting T cell proliferation and differentiation, and stimulating cytokine production (99). Ginsenoside Rg3 exhibits tumor-targeting activity against 4T1 BC cells and modulates the TIME by downregulating TGF-β secretion and altering the TGF-β/SMAD signaling axis, thereby reducing the recruitment of cancer-associated fibroblasts. This reprogramming favors the accumulation of M1-polarized macrophages and enhances immune cell infiltration into the tumor, effectively reversing the immunosuppressive TIME (100). Paeoniflorin, the primary active component of total paeony glycosides, exhibits potent anti-BC effects in the MMTV-PyMT murine model. Its mechanism involves the suppression of CCL2 secretion and inhibition of the NF-κB/CCL2 signaling axis, thereby reducing the infiltration and polarization of TAMs, especially the immunosuppressive M2 subtype. This leads to TIME improvement and inhibition of tumor growth and metastasis (101). Terpenoids such as artemisinin and paclitaxel demonstrate a broad range of effects, including antiproliferative, pro-autophagic, anti-angiogenic, and anti-metastatic activities (102). Artemisinin exerts dual regulation by activating the NF-κB pathway while inhibiting the PPARγ pathway, leading to the polarization of macrophages from an M2-like to an M1-like phenotype. The resulting M1 macrophages secrete chemokines such as CCL5 and CCL3, thereby enhancing the recruitment of various T cell subpopulations within the TIME. Specifically, this shift leads to an increase in CD8+ T cells from 2.8% to 11.5%, and CD4+ T cells from 55.2% to 66.0%, effectively reshaping the BC TIME (103). In TNBC mouse models, the antitumor mechanism of paclitaxel has been linked to its immunoregulatory effects on TAMs. By activating the TLR4 signaling pathway within TAMs, paclitaxel enhances their capacity for cross-presentation of antigens, significantly boosting the CD8+ T cell-mediated antitumor immune response (104). The divergent mechanisms of artemisinin and paclitaxel highlight the multifaceted immunomodulatory capacity of terpenoids, ranging from macrophage reprogramming to enhancement of antigen presentation.

5.2 Regulatory mechanisms of key signaling pathways

TCM modulates key immune-related signaling pathways in the TIME of BC, including NF-κB, MAPK, and JAK-STAT cascades (105). These pathways are essential for immune cell activation, polarization, and the enhancement of antitumor immunity (106). NF-κB is a pivotal transcription factor regulating immune and inflammatory responses (107). TCM-derived compounds exhibit cell-type-specific modulation of this pathway. In a 4T1 subcutaneous xenograft mouse model, chlorogenic acid significantly suppressed NF-κB signaling, increased the proportions of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells within the TIME, and downregulated PD-L1 expression. This reversal of the immunosuppressive TIME led to delayed tumor growth and metastasis (108). Wogonin modulates the PI3Kγ/NF-κB pathway to induce polarization of TAMs toward the M1 phenotype and enhances the secretion of M1-associated effectors such as TNF-α and KYNU. This immune reprogramming significantly increased M1 macrophage infiltration in the TIME and suppressed 4T1 breast tumor growth (106). These findings suggest that the same signaling pathway may elicit distinct immunomodulatory outcomes depending on the cellular context. The MAPK pathway plays a pivotal role in cell proliferation, differentiation, and survival (109). Herbal flavonoids such as curcumin activate MAPK signaling to promote DC maturation and T cell expansion, thereby enhancing antitumor immunity against BC (110). Capsaicin modulates the MAPK cascade and key downstream effectors including MAPKKs, MEK1, and MEK2, strengthening immune surveillance over tumor immune evasion. This mechanism contributes to its potent antitumor effects in BC, counteracting tumor progression, recurrence, and drug resistance (111). The JAK/STAT axis is central to cellular proliferation and immune regulation (112). Quercetin inhibits the activation of the JAK/STAT pathway, suppressing cancer cell survival, proliferation, and immune evasion. It restores immune surveillance, enhances T cell recognition and elimination of malignant cells, and promotes apoptosis of BC cells by upregulating p53 and pro-apoptotic protein BAX, while downregulating STAT3 and anti-apoptotic protein BCL2, thereby retarding tumor progression (113, 114). Naringin regulates the JAK/STAT cascade by downregulating key downstream targets such as STAT3, phosphorylated STAT3, JAK1, and phosphorylated JAK1, thereby enhancing antitumor immune responses. It increases CD8+ T cell infiltration into the tumor, synergistically inhibits cancer cell proliferation and migration, and promotes apoptosis, ultimately suppressing BC growth and metastasis (115). In murine studies, curcumin was shown to inhibit STAT3 expression, enhance intratumoral immune responses, and drive macrophage repolarization from M2 to M1 phenotype, thereby impairing BC cell growth and survival (116).

6 Preclinical and clinical evidence

To systematically verify the role of TCM in modulating the BC TIME, molecular mechanisms can first be elucidated through in vitro cell experiments, followed by in vivo functional validation in animal models, and clinical trials to provide preliminary translational evidence. This integrated evidence framework from basic research to clinical application provides scientific support for the clinical use of TCM.

6.1 In vitro cell-based studies

In vitro cell-based experiments provide a clear visualization of how TCM modulates the BC TIME and elucidate its mechanisms at the molecular and cellular levels. Gambogic acid (GA) has been reported to induce immunogenic cell death, releasing immune signaling molecules such as calreticulin and high-mobility group box protein 1 (HMGB1), thereby promoting the immune functions of DCs and CD8+ T cells, ultimately enhancing anti-breast cancer immunity (118). In immune cell modulation, polysaccharide monomers can stimulate the release of cytokines such as TNF-α and IL-6 in vitro, promoting the polarization of macrophages from the M2 to the M1 phenotype, which in turn inhibits tumor cell growth (119). Additionally, quercetin exhibits anti-BC effects, with two primary mechanisms: firstly, it induces γδ T cell differentiation into Vδ2 T cells to enhance immune regulation, thereby increasing cytotoxicity against BC cells; secondly, it activates the JAK/STAT1 signaling pathway, inhibiting PD-L1 expression and the binding of PD-L1 to PD-1 on T cell surfaces, thereby preventing T cell inhibition and restoring anti-tumor immunity (120). These in vitro experiments provide a preliminary molecular and cellular understanding of TCM’s anti-BC mechanisms, establishing a theoretical foundation for subsequent validation studies in animal models.

6.2 Validation studies in animal models

Animal studies investigating the modulation of the BC TIME by TCM have yielded significant results (121123). These findings provide robust experimental support for the application of TCM in BC immunotherapy. BC mouse models, such as the 4T1 system, are indispensable tools for studying the TIME (124). The 4T1 cell line exhibits high invasiveness and metastatic potential, making it highly suitable for BC research (125). TCM herbs and their active ingredients, such as silymarin, platycodin D, and dihydrotanshinone I, have also demonstrated significant immunomodulatory effects in BC mouse models (126128). For example, momordicine I inhibits M2 macrophage polarization via the MAPK and related pathways, remodeling the TIME and suppressing the growth of 4T1 tumors (129). Compound formulations also elucidate their anti-tumor mechanisms in BC mice through immunomodulation. For instance, Baoyuan Jiedu Decoction blocks the TGF-β/CCL-9 axis, reducing MDSC accumulation, improving the TIME, and inhibiting 4T1 metastasis (130). Overall, both single compounds and multi-herb formulations have demonstrated excellent immunomodulatory efficacy in BC mouse models, providing a solid foundation for clinical translation and boosting confidence in more effective immunotherapies.

6.3 Clinical translation

While numerous preclinical studies have elucidated the mechanisms by which TCM modulates the BC TIME, further human clinical trials are required for validation. A double-blind, randomized controlled trial involving 128 Chinese patients assessed the efficacy of Yanghe Decoction combined with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage II-II BC. The trial design followed a single-center, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind approach. The results showed that the experimental group had a higher pathological complete response rate compared to the control group (55% vs. 30%) (131). Previous immunological studies demonstrated that the experimental group had significant increases in the infiltration of immune cells such as CD3+ and CD8+ T cells, as well as elevated levels of immune factors including IgG, IL-6, and IL-10, providing translational evidence for the use of Yanghe Decoction combined with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (131). Based on these findings, we can infer that Yanghe Decoction modulates the TIME and enhances the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. However, there are limitations in this study, such as the inability of participants to undergo biopsy during neoadjuvant chemotherapy to clarify pathological subtypes, and the variability in the intake of Yanghe Decoction due to individual differences. Another multicenter cohort study evaluated the clinical efficacy and safety of combining San-Yin Decoction with conventional Western medicine in treating non-metastatic, recurrent TNBC (n=320/group). The study found that the recurrence and metastasis rates in the combination therapy group were lower than those in the Western medicine treatment group (12% vs. 33.33%), with immune function assessed every 3 months (NK, CD3, CD4, CD8, CD4/CD8) (132). This suggests that San-Yin Decoction significantly prolongs progression-free survival and overall survival in TNBC patients and has a positive effect on immune function. However, the study has limitations, including the lack of randomization and blinding. Although existing clinical trials demonstrate the potential of TCM in BC immunotherapy, especially when combined with chemotherapy or immunotherapy (e.g., immune checkpoint inhibitors), the clinical data available remains limited. Among the clinical trials registered with the China Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR), only one single-arm trial is directly related to the topic of this review. The trial, titled “Metabolomics Study of Compound Kushen Injection in Immunotherapy for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer” (Registration No.: ChiCTR1900026982), aims to systematically analyze the changes in metabolic profiles and pathways in patients before and after using Compound Kushen Injection. The goal is to identify key metabolites and pathways related to immune responses and perform targeted validation, providing empirical evidence for elucidating the potential metabolic mechanisms by which Compound Kushen Injection modulates the TIME of TNBC and enhances immunotherapy efficacy. Future efforts should focus on large-scale, randomized controlled trials to identify the optimal combination of TCM and modern immunotherapy strategies, thereby providing more effective treatment options for BC patients.

7 Potential of traditional Chinese medicine in breast cancer immunotherapy

In the field of BC immunotherapy, TCM has demonstrated potential as an adjunctive therapy to enhance immune responses, remodel the TIME, and improve overall therapeutic efficacy. Recent experimental studies have focused on combining TCM with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) or adoptive cell therapies. Notably, these combination therapies exhibit synergistic effects (“1 + 1>2”), providing strong impetus for further clinical exploration (133, 134). However, despite limited clinical data supporting the antitumor potential of combining TCM with immunotherapy, large-scale, randomized controlled trials are still lacking in BC immunotherapy, which limits the pace of its clinical translation (Table 3).

Table 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Synergistic effects of traditional chinese medicine (TCM) with immunotherapies in breast cancer (BC).

7.1 Combination of traditional Chinese medicine with immune checkpoint inhibitors

ICIs, such as antibodies targeting PD-1/PD-L1 or CTLA-4, work by releasing the immune “brakes” triggered by tumors, thereby restoring the antitumor functions of T cells (135). However, monotherapy with ICIs has shown only modest effects in BC, highlighting the need for strategies to enhance therapeutic efficacy (136). Increasing evidence suggests that TCM can enhance the efficacy of ICIs through multiple mechanisms (137, 138). For example, Bai Zhu polysaccharides enhance immune responses by downregulating PD-L1 and modulating microRNAs such as miR-34a (139, 140). Further animal studies show that Huagai extract, when combined with PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies, inhibits the transformation of CAFs into myofibroblasts (myoCAFs), significantly enhancing T cell infiltration and activation, and ultimately stimulating an immune response against TNBC (141). Recent clinical trials also confirm that the combination of paclitaxel with PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies significantly improves the prognosis of TNBC patients, with a 27% increase in overall survival and a 13.6% increase in pathological complete response rates. This efficacy is closely related to the immune modulatory function of paclitaxel in regulating the polarization of TAMs towards the M1 phenotype (104). In studies blocking CTLA-4, some research suggests that TCM formulations and their active ingredients can synergize with anti-CTLA-4 therapy by inhibiting Tregs and upregulating effector T cells, enhancing efficacy and reducing adverse effects (87, 142). Baicalin has been shown to increase the tumor infiltration levels of CD8+ T cells and NK cells in low-risk BC patients, while upregulating the expression of the immune checkpoint molecule CTLA-4. This suggests that baicalin may enhance the potential efficacy of CTLA-4 inhibitors in BC patients (143). In summary, these studies suggest that by modulating immune checkpoints, remodeling the tumor microenvironment, and enhancing immune responses, TCM provides promising avenues for combining with BC immunotherapy.

7.2 Synergistic effects of traditional Chinese medicine and cellular immunotherapy

Cellular immunotherapy, particularly T cell and NK cell therapies, has become a cornerstone of BC immunotherapy (144). T cell therapy selectively targets tumor cells by reprogramming autologous T cells (145), while NK cell therapy uses genetically engineered allogeneic NK cells to mediate tumor lysis (146). The efficacy of these cell-based therapies is limited by factors such as immune cell health, immune regulatory mediators, and intrinsic tumor resistance (147). Studies suggest that TCM can enhance the effectiveness of cellular immunotherapy through multiple mechanisms (148). Specific phytochemicals can promote the proliferation and activity of T cells and NK cells, while inhibiting immunosuppressive cells, thereby enhancing the antitumor effects of cellular immunotherapy (149). For instance, the combination of Gui Pi Decoction and NK cell therapy enhanced NK cell activity and achieved significant clinical improvement (148). Additionally, TCM can regulate cytokine secretion and remodel the BC TIME, further enhancing the effects of cellular immunotherapy (89). These findings provide mechanistic support for the combination of TCM and cellular immunotherapy, highlighting its therapeutic potential in BC treatment.

8 Application of omics and network pharmacology in traditional Chinese medicine research

In recent years, omics technologies and network pharmacology have emerged as pivotal research methods, each playing an increasingly important role in elucidating the complex mechanisms of TCM in treating breast cancer. When combined, these two approaches complement each other, contributing to the systematic understanding of how TCM regulates the BC TIME as a whole.

8.1 Multi-omics technologies

The integrated application of transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics provides emerging research strategies to systematically elucidate how TCM modulates the TIME at the molecular level. Multi-omics technologies each have unique features in identifying how TCM affects the TIME in BC. Transcriptomics, by analyzing RNA expression changes, can reveal the regulatory effects of TCM components on the gene expression of immune-related cells. For example, matricaria ester has been found to significantly affect the transcriptome of BC-associated T cells, thereby regulating the TIME (150). Proteomics reveals how TCM regulates the TIME by altering interactions between immune cells and tumor cells (151). Metabolomics further reveals that certain TCM formulations can reshape the TIME by enhancing the immune surveillance function of key immune cells, such as CD8+ T cells, thereby reversing the tumor’s immune evasion state (152). These multi-omics evidences complement each other, enhancing the comprehensiveness of mechanistic research.

8.2 Network pharmacology

Network pharmacology is a powerful tool for analyzing the multi-target mechanisms of TCM formulas. By constructing a multi-dimensional network of “components-targets-pathways,” network pharmacology systematically reveals how TCM formulas regulate immune evasion in BC through multi-target and multi-pathway coordination. This method utilizes software screening and analysis to predict that several active components in TCM formulas may primarily target key molecules such as MAPK3, FOS, and ESR1, exerting anti-BC effects (153). For example, some TCM components can improve the body’s antitumor immune response by intervening in the PD-1/PD-L1 signaling axis (82). This strategy aids in the comprehensive understanding of the integrated regulatory mechanisms of TCM formulas at the multi-target and multi-pathway levels (154). This approach also reveals examples of novel mechanisms of action. For instance, the Fuzheng prescription has been shown to increase immune cell infiltration in the TIME, promote tumor cell apoptosis, and inhibit tumor growth (155). This method not only provides visual scientific evidence for the “multi-target” cancer treatment approach of TCM but also offers new directions for the design of subsequent experiments.

8.3 Integration of methodologies and future perspectives

The integration of omics and network pharmacology not only overcomes the limitations of single technologies but also further reveals the potential mechanisms by which TCM reverses tumor immunosuppressive states, such as through metabolic reprogramming (156). Multi-target action is a distinguishing feature of TCM treatment. TCM formulas often exert antitumor effects against BC by co-regulating multiple targets and pathways. The combination of omics and network pharmacology not only enhances the persuasiveness of experimental evidence but also clarifies the specific roles of various targets and pathways within the therapeutic network (157). Certain TCM formulations can simultaneously intervene in tumor immune evasion and cellular lipid metabolic reprogramming, demonstrating broad potential for application in BC immunotherapy (158). In the future, integrating more advanced techniques, such as single-cell sequencing and spatial transcriptomics, will enable the precise regulation of immune cell subpopulations and their interactions within the TIME at the single-cell and tissue levels. This will provide a solid theoretical foundation for TCM-based immunotherapy for BC (159, 160).

9 Challenges and prospects

TCM systematically regulates the complex TIME through its multi-target properties. This core concept is scientifically grounded and has demonstrated broad potential in BC immunotherapy (17). However, translating this potential into widespread clinical application still requires overcoming a series of challenges. We are confident that, in the near future, TCM will become a powerful adjunct to BC immunotherapy strategies.

9.1 Challenges currently faced

While TCM plays an important role in modulating the BC TIME, it still faces numerous challenges in current clinical applications. Firstly, due to tumor heterogeneity in BC, there is a lack of effective biomarkers for patient stratification, which imposes significant limitations on clinical treatment. The TIME and response to TCM vary among different molecular subtypes of BC. For example, TNBC responds differently to immune cell modulation compared to hormone receptor-positive BC, leading to varied effects of TCM across different subtypes (161, 162). Clinical trials on different molecular subtypes of BC, combined with multi-omics technologies, could be conducted to evaluate the corresponding clinical efficacy. Secondly, the standardization and quality control of TCM preparations remain major obstacles in TCM research. Due to differences in herb cultivation regions and preparation methods, the chemical characteristics of herbal extracts may vary significantly between batches, making it difficult to ensure the consistency and reproducibility of TCM efficacy (163). Closely related to this is the high environmental dependency of TCM’s immune regulatory effects. For example, astragalus polysaccharides show varying immune regulatory effects in different models, potentially promoting immune activation and antitumor effects under certain conditions, while inducing immune suppression or immune balance under other conditions (164). A full-chain quality control system from cultivation to production could be implemented, and modern technologies such as fingerprinting and biological potency assays should be used to evaluate the quality and efficacy of TCM preparations. Furthermore, the dose-response relationship of TCM is highly complex, as many TCM components exhibit non-linear effects. Low doses may be therapeutic, while high doses could lead to unintended and harmful effects, making it difficult to determine the optimal dosage (165). When combined with anticancer drugs, interactions between herbs and medications may occur, potentially diminishing the efficacy of the herbs or increasing the toxicity of the anticancer drugs, thus adding complexity and safety risks to treatment (166). Further research should be conducted to determine the effective dose range of drugs, establish safety evaluation systems for combination therapies, and enhance drug monitoring in clinical settings. Additionally, regulatory challenges for TCM are significant. The core issue lies in the mismatch between the multi-component, multi-target characteristics of TCM formulas and the current drug evaluation systems based on single components. To address this, integrating the unique experiences accumulated in TCM practice, such as innovations in operational procedures, scientific technology applications, and interdisciplinary collaboration, into the regulatory framework will strongly promote the transition of traditional medicines to a more standardized and scientific regulatory path (167). Lastly, many contemporary clinical studies face methodological limitations, including the lack of strict randomization, blinding, and control group designs. These studies often fail to eliminate potential biases, leading to concerns about the rigor and validity of the evidence (168). Future efforts should focus on improving study designs, controlling potential biases, and designing more rigorous, high-quality clinical trials, which will facilitate the clinical translation and application of TCM. In conclusion, while TCM has demonstrated potential in modulating the BC TIME, its clinical application still faces multiple challenges, including tumor heterogeneity, standardization, dose complexity, safety issues, regulatory barriers, and methodological limitations. There is an urgent need for more detailed molecular subtype mechanism studies, standardized herbal formulations, TCM regulatory framework development, and high-quality clinical trials to support its clinical application.

9.2 Immune modulatory potential of non-phytomedicinal traditional Chinese medicine therapies

In addition to herbal medicine, non-phytomedicinal TCM therapies such as acupuncture and moxibustion have also demonstrated potential value in BC rehabilitation and immune modulation. Existing studies suggest that their mechanisms may involve innate and adaptive immunity, by influencing the function and quantity of immune cells and mediators, thus improving tumor immune suppression and achieving immunotherapeutic effects (169). However, research in this field is still in its early stages. Most studies focus on alleviating cancer-related fatigue, improving quality of life, and reducing treatment side effects, with little investigation into direct immune modulation mechanisms (170172). Furthermore, research on the regulation of the BC TIME by non-phytomedicinal therapies is still in its exploratory phase and faces methodological challenges, such as small sample sizes and imperfect control group designs, leading to a lack of reliability in the research conclusions (173). Future research could be further developed in the following ways: Firstly, it is recommended to design rigorous animal and cell experiments to systematically explore the specific mechanisms by which acupuncture and other non-phytomedicinal therapies regulate the BC TIME, such as identifying the key signaling pathways or molecular targets that affect specific immune cells, thereby reshaping the TIME (174). Secondly, clinical trial designs should adhere to methodological rigor, avoiding design flaws, and incorporate immune function-related indicators into the evaluation to enhance the credibility and scientific quality of the trials (175). Finally, due to the high heterogeneity of BC, combining cutting-edge technologies such as single-cell RNA sequencing and spatial transcriptomics will allow for the visualization of the dynamic effects of non-phytomedicinal therapies on the BC TIME, which will aid in guiding subsequent clinical treatments (176).

9.3 Future research directions

To thoroughly evaluate the efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese medicine in breast cancer immunotherapy, future multicenter, large-scale clinical trials are needed to further investigate the interactions of different drug combinations and their pharmacokinetic characteristics (177). These trials should include scientifically rigorous designs, objective diagnostic criteria, comparisons of different treatment regimens, and patient population selection (17). Conducting large-sample trials at multiple sites will increase accuracy and reliability, providing stronger evidence for the application of TCM in BC immunotherapy. For example, a Phase II randomized controlled trial could be designed for TNBC patients with specific TCM syndromes, comparing the efficacy and safety of [specific TCM formula] combined with anti-PD-1 to anti-PD-1 monotherapy. This trial will evaluate efficacy endpoints (such as pathological complete response rate, PFS, OS) and changes in specific components of the TIME to determine the advantages of combining TCM formulas with ICIs. Previous studies have shown that TCM can increase the sensitivity to immune inhibitors by inhibiting PD-1/PD-L1 expression, regulating immune cell functions, and improving the TIME. This combination with anti-PD-1 also demonstrates a synergistic effect (80). Additionally, a Phase III clinical trial for HER2-positive BC could be conducted to investigate the combined efficacy of [specific TCM formula] and standard treatment (such as trastuzumab). This trial will analyze the impact of combination therapy on tumor response rates, drug resistance, and quality of life, and evaluate the effect of TCM on regulating the TIME. Reports indicate that TCM combined with trastuzumab can improve quality of life for HER2-positive BC patients, reduce the cardiac toxicity of targeted drugs, enhance immune function, and potentially enhance the efficacy of targeted therapy by improving the tumor microenvironment (17, 178). Finally, to better integrate with modern immunotherapy, the combination of TCM with CAR-T cell therapy is also an important research direction for the future. A Phase III clinical trial for TNBC could explore how TCM enhances the efficacy of CAR-T cell therapy by modulating T cell and NK cell activity. Based on previous literature, we can hypothesize that TCM may assist CAR-T cell therapy by modulating the TIME (179). These specific clinical trial designs are expected to provide better clinical outcomes for BC immunotherapy and offer valuable insights for immunotherapy of other cancer types. Future research could expand into several new areas. Firstly, existing reviews have pointed out that gut microbiota plays a crucial role in enhancing the efficacy of ICI therapies (180). Building on this, we could explore the combined application of TCM and gut microbiota to verify whether modulating the gut microbiome can improve the TIME, providing additional support for BC immunotherapy. Moreover, the development of immunometabolism provides a new theoretical foundation for exploring how TCM regulates BC-related immune cell metabolism and reprograms the tumor microenvironment. Previous studies have indicated that the metabolic state of the tumor microenvironment affects immune cell function, which is ultimately closely linked to the success of immunotherapy (181). At the same time, integrating artificial intelligence with emerging disciplines such as microbiology and immunometabolism to conduct multi-center, large-scale clinical trials is expected to identify the most suitable TCM and immunotherapy combinations for patients, thereby improving the efficacy and efficiency of treatment. Ultimately, these strategies hold the potential to open up broader applications for cancer immunotherapy.

10 Conclusion

BC, the most common malignant tumor in women worldwide, has a TIME that plays a crucial role in the initiation, progression, and metastasis of the tumor. TCM modulates BC TIME through multiple targets and pathways. TCM, particularly Chinese herbal formulas, has been extensively demonstrated through experimental studies to reshape BC TIME, primarily by modulating the function and polarization of key immune cells, regulating immune checkpoints and cytokine networks, thereby inhibiting tumor immune escape and promoting anti-BC immune responses. Despite ample biological evidence revealing the potential of TCM in modulating BC TIME, its combined application with modern immunotherapy shows promising synergistic effects. The application of omics technologies and network pharmacology continues to elucidate its complex mechanisms of action. However, relevant clinical studies are still in the early stages, and there is a lack of large-scale, high-quality clinical trials to validate its efficacy and safety. The application of TCM in BC immunotherapy still faces multiple challenges, including tumor heterogeneity, dose complexity, and safety issues. Future work should focus on conducting multi-center, large-scale clinical studies to explore the integrative efficacy of TCM with modern immunotherapy, aiming to provide more cost-effective, low-toxicity treatment strategies for BC patients, improve response rates, and reduce adverse reactions, while also providing insights for other cancer types. In conclusion, TCM has demonstrated significant biological effects in BC immunotherapy. As clinical research progresses, it may become one of the key adjunctive strategies in BC immunotherapy.

Author contributions

TL: Writing – original draft. JS: Writing – original draft. JW: Writing – review & editing. LH: Writing – review & editing. MY: Writing – review & editing. RL: Writing – review & editing. BN: Writing – review & editing. JJ: Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declared that financial support was not received for this work and/or its publication.

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that Generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. (2024) 74:229–63. doi: 10.3322/caac.21834

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Xu Y, Gong M, Wang Y, Yang Y, Liu S, and Zeng Q. Global trends and forecasts of breast cancer incidence and deaths. Sci Data. (2023) 10:334. doi: 10.1038/s41597-023-02253-5

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Lei S, Zheng R, Zhang S, Wang S, Chen R, Sun K, et al. Global patterns of breast cancer incidence and mortality: A population-based cancer registry data analysis from 2000 to 2020. Cancer Commun (Lond). (2021) 41:1183–94. doi: 10.1002/cac2.12207

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Xiong X, Zheng LW, Ding Y, Chen YF, Cai YW, Wang LP, et al. Breast cancer: pathogenesis and treatments. Signal Transduct Target Ther. (2025) 10:49. doi: 10.1038/s41392-024-02108-4

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Joyce JA and Pollard JW. Microenvironmental regulation of metastasis. Nat Rev Cancer. (2009) 9:239–52. doi: 10.1038/nrc2618

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Binnewies M, Roberts EW, Kersten K, Chan V, Fearon DF, Merad M, et al. Understanding the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) for effective therapy. Nat Med. (2018) 24:541–50. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0014-x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Hinshaw DC and Shevde LA. The tumor microenvironment innately modulates cancer progression. Cancer Res. (2019) 79:4557–66. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-18-3962

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Greten TF, Schwabe R, Bardeesy N, Ma L, Goyal L, Kelley RK, et al. Immunology and immunotherapy of cholangiocarcinoma. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. (2023) 20:349–65. doi: 10.1038/s41575-022-00741-4

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Huang T, Zhang Q, Yi J, Wang R, Zhang Z, Luo P, et al. PEG-sheddable nanodrug remodels tumor microenvironment to promote effector T cell infiltration and revise their exhaustion for breast cancer immunotherapy. Small. (2023) 19:e2301749. doi: 10.1002/smll.202301749

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Sherman MH. CAFs defang NK cells to promote breast cancer immunosuppression. Cancer Discov. (2025) 15:1096–8. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-25-0512

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Yunna C, Mengru H, Lei W, and Weidong C. Macrophage M1/M2 polarization. Eur J Pharmacol. (2020) 877:173090. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2020.173090

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Lasser SA, Ozbay Kurt FG, Arkhypov I, Utikal J, and Umansky V. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells in cancer and cancer therapy. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. (2024) 21:147–64. doi: 10.1038/s41571-023-00846-y

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Mantovani A, Marchesi F, Malesci A, Laghi L, and Allavena P. Tumour-associated macrophages as treatment targets in oncology. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. (2017) 14:399–416. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2016.217

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Qian BZ and Pollard JW. Macrophage diversity enhances tumor progression and metastasis. Cell. (2010) 141:39–51. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.03.014

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Stanton SE and Disis ML. Clinical significance of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in breast cancer. J Immunother Cancer. (2016) 4:59. doi: 10.1186/s40425-016-0165-6

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Xu T, Zhang H, Yang BB, Qadir J, Yuan H, and Ye T. Tumor-infiltrating immune cells state-implications for various breast cancer subtypes. Front Immunol. (2025) 16:1550003. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1550003

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Song P, Liu T, Zhang Y, Shao T, Li R, An C, et al. Traditional Chinese medicine in the treatment of breast Cancer. Mol Cancer. (2025) 24:209. doi: 10.1186/s12943-025-02416-5

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Zeng L and Yang K. Exploring the pharmacological mechanism of Yanghe Decoction on HER2-positive breast cancer by a network pharmacology approach. J Ethnopharmacol. (2017) 199:68–85. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2017.01.045

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Hong W, Tang H, Wang D, Qian D, Xu Y, Zheng Y, et al. Xihuang pill suppresses breast cancer Malignancy by inhibiting TGF-β signaling and acquires chemotherapy benefits. J Ethnopharmacol. (2025) 337:119000. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2024.119000

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Cui Y, Mi J, Feng Y, Li L, Wang Y, Hu J, et al. Huangqi Sijunzi decoction for treating cancer-related fatigue in breast cancer patients: a randomized trial and network pharmacology study. Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. (2022) 42:649–57. doi: 10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2022.05.04

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Liu XF, Li JW, Chen HZ, Sun ZY, Shi GX, Zhu JM, et al. Yanghe Huayan decoction inhibits the capability of trans-endothelium and angiogenesis of HER2+ breast cancer via pAkt signaling. Biosci Rep. (2019) 39:BSR20181260. doi: 10.1042/BSR20181260

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Fu T, Dai LJ, Wu SY, Xiao Y, Ma D, Jiang YZ, et al. Spatial architecture of the immune microenvironment orchestrates tumor immunity and therapeutic response. J Hematol Oncol. (2021) 14:98. doi: 10.1186/s13045-021-01103-4

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Anderson NM and Simon MC. The tumor microenvironment. Curr Biol. (2020) 30:R921–r925. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2020.06.081

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Wang L, Zhang L, Zhang Z, Wu P, Zhang Y, and Chen X. Advances in targeting tumor microenvironment for immunotherapy. Front Immunol. (2024) 15:1472772. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1472772

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Zong Y, Deng K, and Chong WP. Regulation of Treg cells by cytokine signaling and co-stimulatory molecules. Front Immunol. (2024) 15:1387975. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1387975

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Sharonov GV, Serebrovskaya EO, Yuzhakova DV, Britanova OV, and Chudakov DM. B cells, plasma cells and antibody repertoires in the tumour microenvironment. Nat Rev Immunol. (2020) 20:294–307. doi: 10.1038/s41577-019-0257-x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Bottino C, Picant V, Vivier E, and Castriconi R. Natural killer cells and engagers: Powerful weapons against cancer. Immunol Rev. (2024) 328:412–21. doi: 10.1111/imr.13384

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Beringer DX, Straetemans T, Minguet S, Riillo C, Lynch L, Sebestyen Z, et al. Disrupting the balance between activating and inhibitory receptors of γδT cells for effective cancer immunotherapy. Nat Rev Cancer. (2025) 25:590–612. doi: 10.1038/s41568-025-00830-x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Biswas SK and Mantovani A. Macrophage plasticity and interaction with lymphocyte subsets: cancer as a paradigm. Nat Immunol. (2010) 11:889–96. doi: 10.1038/ni.1937

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Balta E, Wabnitz GH, and Samstag Y. Hijacked immune cells in the tumor microenvironment: molecular mechanisms of immunosuppression and cues to improve T cell-based immunotherapy of solid tumors. Int J Mol Sci. (2021) 22:5736. doi: 10.3390/ijms22115736

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Waldmann TA. Cytokines in cancer immunotherapy. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. (2018) 10:a028472. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a028472

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Yi M, Li T, Niu M, Zhang H, Wu Y, Wu K, et al. Targeting cytokine and chemokine signaling pathways for cancer therapy. Signal Transduct Target Ther. (2024) 9:176. doi: 10.1038/s41392-024-01868-3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Liu Y, Liang J, Zhang Y, and Guo Q. Drug resistance and tumor immune microenvironment: An overview of current understandings (Review). Int J Oncol. (2024) 65:96. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2024.5684

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Ababneh E, Velez S, and Zhao J. Immune evasion and resistance in breast cancer. Am J Cancer Res. (2025) 15:1517–39. doi: 10.62347/PNGT6996

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Ma S, Zhao Y, Lee WC, Ong LT, Lee PL, Jiang Z, et al. Hypoxia induces HIF1α-dependent epigenetic vulnerability in triple negative breast cancer to confer immune effector dysfunction and resistance to anti-PD-1 immunotherapy. Nat Commun. (2022) 13:4118. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-31764-9

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Srivastava N, Usmani SS, Subbarayan R, Saini R, and Pandey PK. Hypoxia: syndicating triple negative breast cancer against various therapeutic regimens. Front Oncol. (2023) 13:1199105. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1199105

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Gunaydin G. CAFs interacting with TAMs in tumor microenvironment to enhance tumorigenesis and immune evasion. Front Oncol. (2021) 11:668349. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.668349

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Jenkins L, Jungwirth U, Avgustinova A, Iravani M, Mills A, Haider S, et al. Cancer-associated fibroblasts suppress CD8+ T-cell infiltration and confer resistance to immune-checkpoint blockade. Cancer Res. (2022) 82:2904–17. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-21-4141

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Huang R, Kang T, and Chen S. The role of tumor-associated macrophages in tumor immune evasion. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. (2024) 150:238. doi: 10.1007/s00432-024-05777-4

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Izadi A, Naimi A, Amjadi E, Beheshtiparvar D, and Soltan M. The prevalence of PD-L1 expression in triple-negative breast cancer patients and its correlation with survival rates and other prognostic factors: A survival analysis. Adv BioMed Res. (2024) 13:86. doi: 10.4103/abr.abr_2_24

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Yang J, Liu C, Guo Y, Guo W, and Wu X. Addition of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors to chemotherapy for triple-negative breast cancer: a meta-analysis. Front Oncol. (2024) 14:1309677. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1309677

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Watanabe MA, Oda JM, Amarante MK, and Cesar Voltarelli J. Regulatory T cells and breast cancer: implications for immunopathogenesis. Cancer Metastasis Rev. (2010) 29:569–79. doi: 10.1007/s10555-010-9247-y

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Markowitz J, Wesolowski R, Papenfuss T, Brooks TR, and Carson WE 3rd. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. (2013) 140:13–21. doi: 10.1007/s10549-013-2618-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Fujiwara Y, Kato S, Nesline MK, Conroy JM, DePietro P, Pabla S, et al. Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) inhibitors and cancer immunotherapy. Cancer Treat Rev. (2022) 110:102461. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2022.102461

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Bai X, Ni J, Beretov J, Graham P, and Li Y. Immunotherapy for triple-negative breast cancer: A molecular insight into the microenvironment, treatment, and resistance. J Natl Cancer Cent. (2021) 1:75–87. doi: 10.1016/j.jncc.2021.06.001

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Voorwerk L, Sanders J, Keusters MS, Balduzzi S, Cornelissen S, Duijst M, et al. Immune landscape of breast tumors with low and intermediate estrogen receptor expression. NPJ Breast Cancer. (2023) 9:39. doi: 10.1038/s41523-023-00543-0

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Perrone M, Talarico G, Chiodoni C, and Sangaletti S. Impact of immune cell heterogeneity on HER2+ Breast cancer prognosis and response to therapy. Cancers (Basel). (2021) 13:6352. doi: 10.3390/cancers13246352

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Moragon S, Hernando C, Martinez-Martinez MT, Tapia M, Ortega-Morillo B, Lluch A, et al. Immunological landscape of HER-2 positive breast cancer. Cancers (Basel). (2022) 14:3167. doi: 10.3390/cancers14133167

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Wang T, Jin J, Qian C, Lou J, Lin J, Xu A, et al. Estrogen/ER in anti-tumor immunity regulation to tumor cell and tumor microenvironment. Cancer Cell Int. (2021) 21:295. doi: 10.1186/s12935-021-02003-w

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Sabit H, Abbas S, El-Safoury MT, Madkour EM, Mahmoud S, Abdel-Ghany S, et al. Antibody-drug conjugates in breast cancer: navigating innovations, overcoming resistance, and shaping future therapies. Biomedicines. (2025) 13:2227. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13092227

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Fu J, Xie X, Yao H, Xiao H, Li Z, Wang Z, et al. The effectiveness of traditional chinese medicine in treating Malignancies via regulatory cell death pathways and the tumor immune microenvironment: A review of recent advances. Am J Chin Med. (2024) 52:137–60. doi: 10.1142/S0192415X2450006X

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Li S, Hao L, Zhang J, Deng J, and Hu X. Focus on T cell exhaustion: new advances in traditional Chinese medicine in infection and cancer. Chin Med. (2023) 18:76. doi: 10.1186/s13020-023-00785-x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Sun LI, Zhuo S, Li X, Kong H, Du W, Zhou C, et al. Astragalus polysaccharide enhances the therapeutic efficacy of cisplatin in triple-negative breast cancer through multiple mechanisms. Oncol Res. (2025) 33:641–51. doi: 10.32604/or.2024.050057

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Zhao X, Liu J, Ge S, Chen C, Li S, Wu X, et al. Saikosaponin A inhibits breast cancer by regulating Th1/Th2 balance. Front Pharmacol. (2019) 10:624. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.00624

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Yang C, Qian C, Zheng W, Dong G, Zhang S, Wang F, et al. Ginsenoside Rh2 enhances immune surveillance of natural killer (NK) cells via inhibition of ERp5 in breast cancer. Phytomedicine. (2024) 123:155180. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2023.155180

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Lian S, Li W, Zhong C, Li Y, Wu C, Zhang K, et al. Ganoderma lucidum spore oil synergistically enhances the function of cyclophosphamide in the prevention of breast cancer metastasis. J Chin Med Assoc. (2024) 87:305–13. doi: 10.1097/JCMA.0000000000001038

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Li F, Shi Y, Ma M, Yang X, Chen X, Xie Y, et al. Xianling Lianxia formula improves the efficacy of trastuzumab by enhancing NK cell-mediated ADCC in HER2-positive BC. J Pharm Anal. (2024) 14:100977. doi: 10.1016/j.jpha.2024.100977

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Li F, Wu Y, Shi Y, Liu X, Xie Y, and Liu S. Xianling Lianxia formula enhances the inhibitory effects of trastuzumab on HER2-positive breast cancer. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai). (2024) 56:462–73. doi: 10.3724/ABBS.2023281

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

59. Qian D, Li J, Huang M, Cui Q, Liu X, and Sun K. Dendritic cell vaccines in breast cancer: Immune modulation and immunotherapy. BioMed Pharmacother. (2023) 162:114685. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2023.114685

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

60. Pan J, Jiang Z, Wu D, Yang C, Wang Z, and Huang J. Huaier extractum promotes dendritic cells maturation and favors them to induce Th1 immune response: one of the mechanisms underlying its anti-tumor activity. Integr Cancer Ther. (2020) 19:1534735420946830. doi: 10.1177/1534735420946830

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

61. Li C, Wang X, Chen T, Li W, Zhou X, Wang L, et al. Huaier induces immunogenic cell death via circCLASP1/PKR/eIF2α Signaling pathway in triple negative breast cancer. Front Cell Dev Biol. (2022) 10:913824. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2022.913824

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

62. Gao J, Zhang YN, Cui J, Zhang J, Ming Y, Hao Z, et al. A polysaccharide from the whole plant of Plantago asiatica L. Enhances the antitumor activity of dendritic cell-based immunotherapy against breast cancer. Front Pharmacol. (2021) 12:678865. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.678865

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

63. Kureshi CT and Dougan SK. Cytokines in cancer. Cancer Cell. (2025) 43:15–35. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2024.11.011

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

64. Su X, Yan X, and Zhang H. The tumor microenvironment in hepatocellular carcinoma: mechanistic insights and therapeutic potential of traditional Chinese medicine. Mol Cancer. (2025) 24:173. doi: 10.1186/s12943-025-02378-8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

65. Miao K, Liu W, Xu J, Qian Z, and Zhang Q. Harnessing the power of traditional Chinese medicine monomers and compound prescriptions to boost cancer immunotherapy. Front Immunol. (2023) 14:1277243. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1277243

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

66. Chen J, Zheng X, Xu G, Wang B, Hu L, Mao J, et al. Sini decoction inhibits tumor progression and enhances the anti-tumor immune response in a murine model of colon cancer. Comb Chem High Throughput Screen. (2023) 26:2517–26. doi: 10.2174/1386207326666230320103437

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

67. Cui X, Liu W, Jiang H, Zhao Q, Hu Y, Tang X, et al. IL-12 family cytokines and autoimmune diseases: A potential therapeutic target? J Transl Autoimmun. (2025) 10:100263. doi: 10.1016/j.jtauto.2024.100263

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

68. Wang J-k, Zhao B-s, Wang M, Liu C-y, Li Y-q, Ma Q-t, et al. Anti-tumor and phenotypic regulation effect of matrine on dendritic cells through regulating TLRs pathway. Chin J Integr Med. (2021) 27:520–6. doi: 10.1007/s11655-020-3433-8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

69. Zhu Z, Peng Q, Duan X, and Li J. Interleukin-12: structure, function, and its impact in colorectal cancer. J Interferon Cytokine Res. (2024) 44:158–69. doi: 10.1089/jir.2023.0190

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

70. Fan X, Liu F, Sun F, Wang Y, Shen W, Wang S, et al. Natural vaccine adjuvants from traditional Chinese medicines: Mechanisms to applications. Acta Pharm Sin B. (2025) 15:4644–4672. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2025.06.021

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

71. Xiong J, Jiang B, Luo Y, Zou J, Gao X, Xu D, et al. Multifunctional nanoparticles encapsulating astragalus polysaccharide and gold nanorods in combination with focused ultrasound for the treatment of breast cancer. Int J Nanomedicine. (2020) 15:4151–69. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S246447

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

72. Kuburich NA, Sabapathy T, Demestichas BR, Maddela JJ, den Hollander P, and Mani SA. Proactive and reactive roles of TGF-β in cancer. In: Seminars in cancer biology. Amsterdam: Elsevier (2023). p. 120–39.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

73. Guo J, Chen T, Ma Z, Qiao C, Yuan F, Guo X, et al. Oridonin inhibits 4T1 tumor growth by suppressing Treg differentiation via TGF-β receptor. Int Immunopharmacol. (2020) 88:106831. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2020.106831

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

74. Cecerska-Heryć E, Jerzyk A, Goszka M, Polikowska A, Rachwalska J, Serwin N, et al. TGF-β Signaling in cancer: mechanisms of progression and therapeutic targets. Int J Mol Sci. (2025) 26:7326.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

75. Andrews LP, Yano H, and Vignali DAA. Inhibitory receptors and ligands beyond PD-1, PD-L1 and CTLA-4: breakthroughs or backups. Nat Immunol. (2019) 20:1425–34. doi: 10.1038/s41590-019-0512-0

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

76. Chen Y, Fan W, Zhao Y, Liu M, Hu L, and Zhang W. Progress in the regulation of immune cells in the tumor microenvironment by bioactive compounds of traditional Chinese medicine. Molecules. (2024) 29:2374. doi: 10.3390/molecules29102374

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

77. Waldman AD, Fritz JM, and Lenardo MJ. A guide to cancer immunotherapy: from T cell basic science to clinical practice. Nat Rev Immunol. (2020) 20:651–68. doi: 10.1038/s41577-020-0306-5

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

78. Liu Y, Liu X, Zhang N, Yin M, Dong J, Zeng Q, et al. Berberine diminishes cancer cell PD-L1 expression and facilitates antitumor immunity via inhibiting the deubiquitination activity of CSN5. Acta Pharm Sin B. (2020) 10:2299–312. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2020.06.014

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

79. Liu Y, Hu Y, Xue J, Li J, Yi J, Bu J, et al. Advances in immunotherapy for triple-negative breast cancer. Mol Cancer. (2023) 22:145. doi: 10.1186/s12943-023-01850-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

80. Zheng H, Wang G, Liu M, and Cheng H. Traditional Chinese medicine inhibits PD-1/PD-L1 axis to sensitize cancer immunotherapy: a literature review. Front Oncol. (2023) 13:1168226. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1168226

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

81. Jama M, Tabana Y, and Barakat KH. Targeting cytotoxic lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) in breast cancer. Eur J Med Res. (2024) 29:353. doi: 10.1186/s40001-024-01901-9

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

82. Chen L, Zheng X, Huang H, Feng C, Wu S, Chen R, et al. Cordycepin synergizes with CTLA-4 blockade to remodel the tumor microenvironment for enhanced cancer immunotherapy. Int Immunopharmacol. (2023) 124:110786. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2023.110786

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

83. Ko MM, Na SW, Yi J-M, Jang H, Choi CM, Lee SH, et al. Effects of Bojungikki-Tang on immune response and clinical outcomes in NSCLC patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors: a randomized pilot study. BMC Cancer. (2025) 25:1229. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14629-4

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

84. Kothari M, Wanjari A, Acharya S, Karwa V, Chavhan R, Kumar S, et al. A comprehensive review of monoclonal antibodies in modern medicine: tracing the evolution of a revolutionary therapeutic approach. Cureus. (2024) 16:e61983. doi: 10.7759/cureus.61983

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

85. Xue C, Yao Q, Gu X, Shi Q, Yuan X, Chu Q, et al. Evolving cognition of the JAK-STAT signaling pathway: autoimmune disorders and cancer. Signal Transduct Target Ther. (2023) 8:204. doi: 10.1038/s41392-023-01468-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

86. Rajagopal D, MacLeod E, Corogeanu D, and Vessillier S. Immune-related adverse events of antibody-based biological medicines in cancer therapy. J Cell Mol Med. (2024) 28:e18470. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.18470

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

87. Wang M, Yang F, Kong J, Zong Y, Li Q, Shao B, et al. Traditional Chinese medicine enhances the effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors in tumor treatment: A mechanism discussion. J Ethnopharmacol. (2025) 338:118955. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2024.118955

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

88. Ke Y, Pan Y, Huang X, Bai X, Liu X, Zhang M, et al. Efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for the treatment of cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Pharmacol. (2025) 16:1661503. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1661503

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

89. He T, Yu S, and Wu C. Progress of traditional Chinese medicine in regulating immune cell in the tumor microenvironment of triple-negative breast cancer. Integr Cancer Ther. (2025) 24:15347354251349824. doi: 10.1177/15347354251349824

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

90. Ma Y, Pan Y, Zhao Q, Zhang C, He H, Pan L, et al. Exploring the therapeutic potential and in vitro validation of baicalin for the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer. Front Pharmacol. (2025) 16:1530056. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1530056

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

91. Feng R-Q, Li D-H, Liu X-K, Zhao X-H, Wen Q-E, and Yang Y. Traditional Chinese medicine for breast cancer: a review. Breast Cancer: Targets Ther. (2023), 747–59. doi: 10.2147/BCTT.S429530

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

92. Li J, Wang S, Wang N, Zheng Y, Yang B, Wang X, et al. Aiduqing formula inhibits breast cancer metastasis by suppressing TAM/CXCL1-induced Treg differentiation and infiltration. Cell Commun Signal. (2021) 19:89. doi: 10.1186/s12964-021-00775-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

93. Wang S, Long S, Deng Z, and Wu W. Positive role of Chinese herbal medicine in cancer immune regulation. Am J Chin Med. (2020) 48:1577–92. doi: 10.1142/S0192415X20500780

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

94. Nawaz M, Nawaz A, Khan MN, Tanziela T, Zahid A, Zhong W, et al. Flavonoids being chemo-preventive agents induce programmed cell death: mechanisms and therapeutic potentials. Phytother Res. (2025) 39:4369–4403. doi: 10.1002/ptr.70018

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

95. Liao Y, Xie X, Zhang C, Zhong H, Shan L, Yu P, et al. Quercetin exerts anti-tumor immune mechanism by regulating IL-6/JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway to deplete Treg cells. Toxicon. (2024) 243:107747. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2024.107747

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

96. Han X, Zhao N, Zhu W, Wang J, Liu B, and Teng Y. Resveratrol attenuates TNBC lung metastasis by down-regulating PD-1 expression on pulmonary T cells and converting macrophages to M1 phenotype in a murine tumor model. Cell Immunol. (2021) 368:104423. doi: 10.1016/j.cellimm.2021.104423

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

97. Wei L, Wang H, Ye X, Yue J, Guo H, Mao D, et al. Oxymatrine and astragaloside IV co-loaded liposomes: Scale-up purposes and their enhancement of anti-PD-1 efficacy against breast cancer. Mater Today Bio. (2025) 32:101634. doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2025.101634

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

98. Duan S, Li X, Song C, Wu S, Tang Y, Bao Q, et al. Isoliquiritigenin inhibits triple-negative breast cancer progression via targeting the IRF5/SLC7A5/IDO1-mediated tryptophan metabolism pathway. Oncol Res. (2025) 33:3543–56. doi: 10.32604/or.2025.068292

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

99. Cao L, Dong P, Liu J, Zhang J, Xie H, Yu S, et al. Advancements in saponin-based vaccine adjuvants. Medicinal Chem Res. (2025), 34:1–16. doi: 10.1007/s00044-025-03453-x

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

100. Xia J, Zhang S, Zhang R, Wang A, Zhu Y, Dong M, et al. Targeting therapy and tumor microenvironment remodeling of triple-negative breast cancer by ginsenoside Rg3 based liposomes. J Nanobiotechnology. (2022) 20:414. doi: 10.1186/s12951-022-01623-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

101. Jin L, Guo Y, Mao W, Wang J, Jin L, Liu X, et al. Total glucosides of paeony inhibit breast cancer growth by inhibiting TAMs infiltration through NF-κB/CCL2 signaling. Phytomedicine. (2022) 104:154307. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2022.154307

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

102. El-Baba C, Baassiri A, Kiriako G, Dia B, Fadlallah S, Moodad S, et al. Terpenoids’ anti-cancer effects: focus on autophagy. Apoptosis. (2021) 26:491–511. doi: 10.1007/s10495-021-01684-y

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

103. Wang Y, Meng L, Su S, Zhao Y, Hu X, Xu X, et al. Artemisia annua-derived extracellular vesicles reprogram breast tumor immune microenvironment via altering macrophage polarization and synergizing recruitment of T lymphocytes. Chin Med. (2025) 20:1–21. doi: 10.1186/s13020-025-01210-1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

104. Choi Y, Kim SA, Jung H, Kim E, Kim YK, Kim S, et al. Novel insights into paclitaxel’s role on tumor-associated macrophages in enhancing PD-1 blockade in breast cancer treatment. J Immunother Cancer. (2024) 12:e008864. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2024-008864

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

105. Feng D, Pu D, Ren J, Liu M, Sun X, Zhang Z, et al. Mechanistic exploration of Traditional Chinese Medicine regulation on tumor immune microenvironment in the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer: based on CiteSpace and bioinformatics analysis. Front Immunol. (2024) 15:1443648. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1443648

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

106. He S, Wang S, Liu S, Li Z, Liu X, and Wu J. Baicalein potentiated M1 macrophage polarization in cancer through targeting PI3Kγ/NF-κB signaling. Front Pharmacol. (2021) 12:743837. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.743837

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

107. Zhang T, Ma C, Zhang Z, Zhang H, and Hu H. NF-κB signaling in inflammation and cancer. MedComm (2020). (2021) 2:618–53. doi: 10.1002/mco2.104

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

108. Zeng A, Liang X, Zhu S, Liu C, Wang S, Zhang Q, et al. Chlorogenic acid induces apoptosis, inhibits metastasis and improves antitumor immunity in breast cancer via the NF−κB signaling pathway. Oncol Rep. (2021) 45:717–27. doi: 10.3892/Or.2020.7891

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

109. Guo Y-J, Pan W-W, Liu S-B, Shen Z-F, Xu Y, and Hu L-L. ERK/MAPK signalling pathway and tumorigenesis. Exp Ther Med. (2020) 19:1997–2007. doi: 10.3892/etm.2020.8454

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

110. Sudhakaran M, Sardesai S, and Doseff AI. Flavonoids: new frontier for immuno-regulation and breast cancer control. Antioxidants (Basel). (2019) 8:103. doi: 10.3390/antiox8040103

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

111. Kubatka P, Bojkova B, Nosalova N, Huniadi M, Samuel SM, Sreenesh B, et al. Targeting the MAPK signaling pathway: implications and prospects of flavonoids in 3P medicine as modulators of cancer cell plasticity and therapeutic resistance in breast cancer patients. Epma J. (2025) 16:437–63. doi: 10.1007/s13167-025-00407-6

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

112. Hu X, Li J, Fu M, Zhao X, and Wang W. The JAK/STAT signaling pathway: from bench to clinic. Signal transduction targeted Ther. (2021) 6:402. doi: 10.1038/s41392-021-00791-1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

113. Zalpoor H, Nabi-Afjadi M, Forghaniesfidvajani R, Tavakol C, Farahighasreaboonasr F, Pakizeh F, et al. Quercetin as a JAK-STAT inhibitor: a potential role in solid tumors and neurodegenerative diseases. Cell Mol Biol Lett. (2022) 27:60. doi: 10.1186/s11658-022-00355-3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

114. Silva-Pinto PA, de Pontes JTC, Aguilar-Morón B, Canales CSC, Pavan FR, and Roque-Borda CA. Phytochemical insights into flavonoids in cancer: Mechanisms, therapeutic potential, and the case of quercetin. Heliyon. (2025) 11:e42682. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e42682

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

115. Anami T, Pan C, Fujiwara Y, Komohara Y, Yano H, Saito Y, et al. Dysfunction of sinus macrophages in tumor-bearing host induces resistance to immunotherapy. Cancer Sci. (2024) 115:59–69. doi: 10.1111/cas.16003

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

116. Golmohammadi M, Zamanian MY, Al-Ani AM, Jabbar TL, Kareem AK, Aghaei ZH, et al. Targeting STAT3 signaling pathway by curcumin and its analogues for breast cancer: A narrative review. Anim Model Exp Med. (2024) 7:853–67. doi: 10.1002/ame2.12491

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

117. Effat H, Abosharaf HA, and Radwan AM. Combined effects of naringin and doxorubicin on the JAK/STAT signaling pathway reduce the development and spread of breast cancer cells. Sci Rep. (2024) 14:2824. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-53320-9

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

118. Qiu C, Guo P, Wang C, Tu Q, Zhong L, Fu Y, et al. Synergistic gambogic acid/Ga³+ remodels the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment to enhance triple-negative breast cancer therapy. J Nanobiotechnology. (2025) 23:710. doi: 10.1186/s12951-025-03758-4

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

119. Wei J, Dai Y, Zhang N, Wang Z, Tian X, Yan T, et al. Natural plant-derived polysaccharides targeting macrophage polarization: a promising strategy for cancer immunotherapy. Front Immunol. (2024) 15:1408377. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1408377

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

120. Qiu D, Yan X, Xiao X, Zhang G, Wang Y, Cao J, et al. To explore immune synergistic function of Quercetin in inhibiting breast cancer cells. Cancer Cell Int. (2021) 21:632. doi: 10.1186/s12935-021-02345-5

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

121. Nava-Ochoa A, Stranahan LW, San-Cristobal R, Mertens-Talcott SU, and Noratto GD. Dark sweet cherry anthocyanins suppressed triple-negative breast cancer pulmonary metastasis and downregulated genes associated with metastasis and therapy resistance in vivo. Int J Mol Sci. (2025) 26:7225. doi: 10.3390/ijms26157225

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

122. Feng M, Fu F, Lei M, Luo W, Su Y, Xie Y, et al. Structural feature and antitumor activity of a N-acetylglucosamine containing polysaccharide from Ganoderma sinense. Carbohydr Polym. (2025) 366:123838. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2025.123838

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

123. Yuan F, Qiao Y, Chen Z, He H, Wang F, and Chen J. Molecular Mechanisms of Lobelia nummularia Extract in Breast Cancer: Targeting EGFR/TP53 and PI3K-AKT-mTOR Signaling via ROS-Mediated Apoptosis. Curr Issues Mol Biol. (2025) 47:546. doi: 10.3390/cimb47070546

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

124. Ma Q, Chen Y, Qin Q, Guo F, Wang YS, and Li D. CXCL13 expression in mouse 4T1 breast cancer microenvironment elicits antitumor immune response by regulating immune cell infiltration. Precis Clin Med. (2021) 4:155–67. doi: 10.1093/pcmedi/pbab020

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

125. Tao K, Fang M, Alroy J, and Sahagian GG. Imagable 4T1 model for the study of late stage breast cancer. BMC Cancer. (2008) 8:228. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-8-228

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

126. Wu S, Liu D, Li W, Song B, Chen C, Chen D, et al. Enhancing TNBC Chemo-immunotherapy via combination reprogramming tumor immune microenvironment with Immunogenic Cell Death. Int J Pharm. (2021) 598:120333. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.120333

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

127. Ye Y, Xie Y, Pei L, Jiang Z, Wu C, and Liu S. Platycodin D induces neutrophil apoptosis by downregulating PD-L1 expression to inhibit breast cancer pulmonary metastasis. Int Immunopharmacol. (2023) 115:109733. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2023.109733

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

128. Zhao H, Liang Y, Sun C, Zhai Y, Li X, Jiang M, et al. Dihydrotanshinone I inhibits the lung metastasis of breast cancer by suppressing neutrophil extracellular traps formation. Int J Mol Sci. (2022) 23:15180. doi: 10.3390/ijms232315180

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

129. Kesh K, Tran ET, Patel RA, Ma CX, and Ray RB. Targeting triple-negative breast cancer with momordicine-I for therapeutic gain in preclinical models. Cancers (Basel). (2025) 17:2342. doi: 10.3390/cancers17142342

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

130. Guo J, Shen Y, Hu S, Rui T, Liu J, and Yuan Y. Neobavaisoflavone inhibits antitumor immunosuppression via myeloid-derived suppressor cells. Int Immunopharmacol. (2022) 111:109103. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2022.109103

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

131. Zhang X, Hu M, Li S, Sha S, Mao R, Liu Y, et al. Clinical study on Yanghe decoction in improving neo-adjuvant chemotherapy efficacy and immune function of breast cancer patients. Med (Baltimore). (2022) 101:e29031. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029031

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

132. Chen J, Qin Y, Sun C, Hao W, Zhang S, Wang Y, et al. Clinical study on postoperative triple-negative breast cancer with Chinese medicine: Study protocol for an observational cohort trial. Med (Baltimore). (2018) 97:e11061. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011061

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

133. Lee EJ, Kim JH, Kim TI, Kim YJ, Pak ME, Jeon CH, et al. Sanguisorbae radix suppresses colorectal tumor growth through PD-1/PD-L1 blockade and synergistic effect with pembrolizumab in a humanized PD-L1-expressing colorectal cancer mouse model. Front Immunol. (2021) 12:737076. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.737076

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

134. Wang Z, Li M, Bi L, Hu X, and Wang Y. Traditional Chinese medicine in regulating tumor microenvironment. OncoTargets Ther. (2024), 17:313–25. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S444214

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

135. Gao W, Wang X, Zhou Y, Wang X, and Yu Y. Autophagy, ferroptosis, pyroptosis, and necroptosis in tumor immunotherapy. Signal Transduct Target Ther. (2022) 7:196. doi: 10.1038/s41392-022-01046-3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

136. Keenan TE and Tolaney SM. Role of immunotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. (2020) 18:479–89. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2020.7554

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

137. Yu P, Wei H, Li K, Zhu S, Li J, Chen C, et al. The traditional chinese medicine monomer Ailanthone improves the therapeutic efficacy of anti-PD-L1 in melanoma cells by targeting c-Jun. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. (2022) 41:346. doi: 10.1186/s13046-022-02559-z

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

138. Han X, Wei Q, Lv Y, Weng L, Huang H, Wei Q, et al. Ginseng-derived nanoparticles potentiate immune checkpoint antibody efficacy by reprogramming the cold tumor microenvironment. Mol Ther. (2022) 30:327–40. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2021.08.028

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

139. Meng F, Chen Y, Yang M, Zhang H, and Wang W. Concomitant inhibition of B7-H3 and PD-L1 expression by a novel and synthetic microRNA delivers potent antitumor activities in colorectal tumor models. Invest New Drugs. (2021) 39:1267–74. doi: 10.1007/s10637-021-01123-4

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

140. Han YC, Chen YL, Fan XQ, Shang YW, Chen X, Wang G, et al. Polysaccharide of Atractylodis Macrocephalae Rhizoma inhibits expression of immune checkpoint PD-L1 by targeting miR-34a in esophageal carcinoma cells. Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi. (2022) 47:1658–65. doi: 10.19540/j.cnki.cjcmm.20211203.701

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

141. Li C, Wang X, Xing L, Chen T, Li W, Li X, et al. Huaier-induced suppression of cancer-associated fibroblasts confers immunotherapeutic sensitivity in triple-negative breast cancer. Phytomedicine. (2024) 135:156051. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2024.156051

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

142. Li X, Xu P, Wang C, Xu N, Xu A, Xu Y, et al. Synergistic effects of the immune checkpoint inhibitor CTLA-4 combined with the growth inhibitor lycorine in a mouse model of renal cell carcinoma. Oncotarget. (2017) 8:21177–86. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.15505

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

143. Li J, Qiao H, Jia Y, Yao P, Wei X, Feng Z, et al. Pharmacological targets and mechanism of baicalein in treating breast cancer: a study based on network pharmacology, molecular docking, and bioinformatics analysis. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. (2025). doi: 10.1007/s00210-025-04479-z

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

144. Chamorro DF, Somes LK, and Hoyos V. Engineered adoptive T-cell therapies for breast cancer: current progress, challenges, and potential. Cancers (Basel). (2023) 16:124. doi: 10.3390/cancers16010124

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

145. Baker DJ, Arany Z, Baur JA, Epstein JA, and June CH. CAR T therapy beyond cancer: the evolution of a living drug. Nature. (2023) 619:707–15. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06243-w

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

146. Pan R, Ryan J, Pan D, Wucherpfennig KW, and Letai A. Augmenting NK cell-based immunotherapy by targeting mitochondrial apoptosis. Cell. (2022) 185:1521–38.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2022.03.030

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

147. Sharma P, Hu-Lieskovan S, Wargo JA, and Ribas A. Primary, adaptive, and acquired resistance to cancer immunotherapy. Cell. (2017) 168:707–23. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.01.017

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

148. Zhang Y, Lou Y, Wang J, Yu C, and Shen W. Research status and molecular mechanism of the traditional Chinese medicine and antitumor therapy combined strategy based on tumor microenvironment. Front Immunol. (2020) 11:609705. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.609705

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

149. Chen F, Li J, Wang H, and Ba Q. Anti-tumor effects of Chinese medicine compounds by regulating immune cells in microenvironment. Front Oncol. (2021) 11:746917. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.746917

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

150. Shi S, Tian X, Gong Y, Sun M, Liu J, Zhang J, et al. Pivotal role of JNK protein in the therapeutic efficacy of parthenolide against breast cancer: Novel and comprehensive evidences from network pharmacology, single-cell RNA sequencing and metabolomics. Int J Biol Macromol. (2024) 279:135209. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.135209

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

151. Bian M, Ji J, Lian N, Li Y, Zhu W, Cao P, et al. Glycyrrhetinic acid orchestrates ERS-pyroptosis crosstalk to elicit immunogenic cell death in hepatocellular carcinoma. Phytomedicine. (2025) 148:157309. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2025.157309

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

152. Zhang C, Sui C, Ma X, Ma C, Sun X, Zhai C, et al. Therapeutic potential of Xihuang Pill in colorectal cancer: Metabolomic and microbiome-driven approaches. Front Pharmacol. (2024) 15:1402448. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1402448

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

153. Huang S, Lv Q, Pan R, and Ma Y. Molecular mechanism of HaiZao-YuHu decoction in breast cancer treatment via network pharmacology and molecular docking: Computational pharmacology. Med (Baltimore). (2025) 104:e44828. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000044828

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

154. Lu Y, Duan J, Xiong H, Wu B, Duan J, Yang Z, et al. Unraveling the mechanisms of modified Si Miao San in treating gouty arthritis: network pharmacology and experimental validation. BioMed Chromatogr. (2025) 39:e70261. doi: 10.1002/bmc.70261

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

155. Xie Y, Yan F, Wang X, Yu L, Yan H, Pu Q, et al. Mechanisms and network pharmacological analysis of Yangyin Fuzheng Jiedu prescription in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Med. (2023) 12:3237–59. doi: 10.1002/cam4.5064

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

156. Tan P, Wei X, Huang H, Wang F, Wang Z, Xie J, et al. Application of omics technologies in studies on antitumor effects of Traditional Chinese Medicine. Chin Med. (2024) 19:123. doi: 10.1186/s13020-024-00995-x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

157. Wang Y, Yang R, Shi Y, and Liu S. Elucidating the pharmacological basis of Xianling Cifang granules against breast cancer. A metabolomic profiling study. Drug Des Devel Ther. (2025) 19:8213–36. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S530516

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

158. Zuo Q, Wu Y, Hu Y, Shao C, Liang Y, Chen L, et al. Targeting lipid reprogramming in the tumor microenvironment by traditional Chinese medicines as a potential cancer treatment. Heliyon. (2024) 10:e30807. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30807

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

159. Santiago A, Ghasemi F, Goebel E, Bhat V, Wang Q, Allan A, et al. Spatial omics in biomarker discovery in breast cancer: a narrative review. Ann Breast Surg. (2025) 9:24. doi: 10.21037/abs-25-24

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

160. Xiao J, Yu X, Meng F, Zhang Y, Zhou W, Ren Y, et al. Integrating spatial and single-cell transcriptomics reveals tumor heterogeneity and intercellular networks in colorectal cancer. Cell Death Dis. (2024) 15:326. doi: 10.1038/s41419-024-06598-6

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

161. Goldberg J, Pastorello RG, Vallius T, Davis J, Cui YX, Agudo J, et al. The immunology of hormone receptor positive breast cancer. Front Immunol. (2021) 12:674192. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.674192

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

162. Bai X, Ta N, Gong GH, Zhang B, and Wei CX. Effects of integrated chinese traditional medicine and conventional western medicine on the quality of life of breast cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. (2022) 2022:3123878. doi: 10.1155/2022/3123878

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

163. Wang J, Sasse A, and Sheridan H. Traditional Chinese medicine: from aqueous extracts to therapeutic formulae. In: Plant Extracts. London: IntechOpen (2019).

Google Scholar

164. Bo W, Wu B, Ma Y, Liu X, Tao L, Jia L, et al. Astragalus polysaccharides: structure-immunomodulation relationships, multi-target pharmacological activities, and cutting-edge applications in immune modulation. Front Immunol. 16:1714898. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1714898

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

165. Chen Y-Y, Chen J-Q, Tang Y-P, Shang E-X, Zhao Q, Zou J-B, et al. Integrated dose–response metabolomics with therapeutic effects and adverse reactions may demystify the dosage of traditional Chinese medicine. Chin Med. (2022) 17:130. doi: 10.1186/s13020-022-00687-4

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

166. Duan X, Fan X, Jiang H, Li J, Shen X, Xu Z, et al. Herb-drug interactions in oncology: pharmacodynamic/pharmacokinetic mechanisms and risk prediction. Chin Med. (2025) 20:107. doi: 10.1186/s13020-025-01156-4

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

167. Liang Z, Lai Y, Li M, Shi J, Lei CI, Hu H, et al. Applying regulatory science in traditional Chinese medicines for improving public safety and facilitating innovation in China: a scoping review and regulatory implications. Chin Med. (2021) 16:23. doi: 10.1186/s13020-021-00433-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

168. Sargeant JM, Brennan ML, and O’Connor AM. Levels of evidence, quality assessment, and risk of bias: evaluating the internal validity of primary research. Front Vet Sci. (2022) 9:960957. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.960957

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

169. Wang N, Zhao L, Zhang D, and Kong F. Research progress on the immunomodulatory mechanism of acupuncture in tumor immune microenvironment. Front Immunol. (2023) 14:1092402. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1092402

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

170. Zhao Y, Cao W, Zhang H, Rong Q, He M, Wu M, et al. The efficacy of acupuncture in the treatment of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy in cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cancer Surviv. (2025). doi: 10.1007/s11764-025-01869-3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

171. Zhu J, Chen X, Zhen X, Zheng H, Chen H, Chen H, et al. Meta-analysis of effects of yoga exercise intervention on sleep quality in breast cancer patients. Front Oncol. (2023) 13:1146433. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1146433

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

172. Zhang Y, Li Y, Ji F, Zhang K, Lou Y, and Xu H. Transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation versus dexamethasone for prophylaxis of postoperative nausea and vomiting in breast surgery: A non-inferiority randomized controlled trial. Surgery. (2023) 174:787–93. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.06.014

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

173. Wang ZN, Tian GH, Ding JR, Lin Y, Zhang LN, Li X, et al. Acupuncture effect on brain default mode network connectivity in breast cancer patients with hot flashes: A randomized controlled trial. Eur J Cancer. (2025) 229:115785. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2025.115785

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

174. Xu X, Wang N, Li Y, Fan S, Mu B, and Zhu J. Acupuncture potentiates anti-PD-1 efficacy by promoting CD5(+) dendritic cells and T cell-mediated tumor immunity in a mouse model of breast cancer. Nutr Cancer. (2025), 77:1–14. doi: 10.1080/01635581.2025.2517737

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

175. Zheng K, Hong X, Jiang C, and Chen Y. Effects of warming needle moxibustion on postoperative rehabilitation, pain degree, immune function, and upper limb lymphedema in patients with breast cancer undergoing radical mastectomy. Am J Cancer Res. (2025) 15:991–1001. doi: 10.62347/YXHG6188

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

176. Xin Y, Ma Q, Deng Q, Wang T, Wang D, and Wang G. Analysis of single-cell and spatial transcriptomics in TNBC cell-cell interactions. Front Immunol. (2025) 16:1521388. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1521388

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

177. Ho VW-T, Tan H-Y, Guo W, Li S, Wang N, Meng W, et al. Efficacy and safety of Chinese herbal medicine on treatment of breast cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Chin Med. (2021) 49:1557–75. doi: 10.1142/S0192415X21500737

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

178. Lin M, Xiong W, Wang S, Li Y, Hou C, Li C, et al. The research progress of trastuzumab-induced cardiotoxicity in HER-2-positive breast cancer treatment. Front Cardiovasc Med. (2022) 8:821663. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.821663

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

179. Zhang Q, Su C, Luo Y, Zheng F, Liang CL, Chen Y, et al. Astragalus polysaccharide enhances antitumoral effects of chimeric antigen receptor- engineered (CAR) T cells by increasing CD122(+)CXCR3(+)PD-1(-) memory T cells. BioMed Pharmacother. (2024) 179:117401. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2024.117401

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

180. Lim MY, Hong S, and Nam YD. Understanding the role of the gut microbiome in solid tumor responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors for personalized therapeutic strategies: a review. Front Immunol. (2024) 15:1512683. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1512683

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

181. Su R, Shao Y, Huang M, Liu D, Yu H, and Qiu Y. Immunometabolism in cancer: basic mechanisms and new targeting strategy. Cell Death Discov. (2024) 10:236. doi: 10.1038/s41420-024-02006-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: breast cancer, immune evasion, immunotherapy, traditional Chinese medicine, tumor immune microenvironment

Citation: Liu T, Shang J, Wang J, Han L, Yang M, Li R, Ni B and Jiang J (2026) Regulatory effects of traditional Chinese medicine on the breast-cancer immune microenvironment. Front. Immunol. 16:1706379. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1706379

Received: 16 September 2025; Accepted: 23 December 2025; Revised: 18 December 2025;
Published: 15 January 2026.

Edited by:

Lilia Bardoscia, Casa di Cura Villa Fiorita - Azienda USL Toscana Centro, Italy

Reviewed by:

Sirajudheen Anwar, University of Hail, Saudi Arabia
Athanasios Armakolas, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece

Copyright © 2026 Liu, Shang, Wang, Han, Yang, Li, Ni and Jiang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Jiakang Jiang, amlhbmdqaWFrYW5nMTk2NEAxNjMuY29t

These authors have contributed equally to this work

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.