- 1Center for Immunology and Inflammatory Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- 2Department of Medical Biochemistry, University for Business and Technology (UBT)-Higher Education Institution, Prishtina, Kosovo
Immunoglobulin E (IgE) and its corresponding Fc epsilon receptors (FcϵRs) are essential components of the immune system. The constant, crystallizable fragment (Fc) region of IgE binds with high affinity to its specific receptor, FcϵRI, anchoring IgE molecules to the surface of effector cells such as mast cells and basophils. Once bound, IgE uses its antigen-binding fragment (Fab) to recognize specific antigens. Antigen-induced crosslinking of cell-bound IgE triggers activation of these effector cells. Over fifty years ago, intensive research identified IgE as a key mediator of allergic reactions. Subsequent studies have demonstrated that the production of antigen-specific IgE and its interactions with innate immune cells are critical not only for allergic responses but also for certain non-atopic immune processes. N-glycosylation, a crucial post-translational modification, has been shown to strongly influence the stability and function of IgG antibodies. Similarly, glycosylation is vital for maintaining the structure and biological activity of IgE. Individual variations in IgE glycosylation patterns regulate its functional properties, contributing to the diversity and complexity of IgE-mediated immune responses. Given the emerging role of IgE in non-atopic diseases, understanding how site-specific glycosylation variations affect IgE function is essential for characterizing disease-specific molecular signatures and identifying new therapeutic targets. Comprehensive glycoproteomic analyses of IgE from diverse pathological conditions may clarify how glycosylation influences disease progression, identify Fc glycans associated with pathology, and elucidate their biological roles.
1 Introduction
The year 2016 marked the 50th anniversary of the discovery of immunoglobulin E (IgE) (1, 2). Since then, the relationship between immunoglobulin (Ig) structure and function has been extensively studied. However, the low serum concentration of IgE and the historical lack of sensitive analytical methods have limited a full understanding of its biology. The availability of large quantities of IgE from individuals with myeloma facilitated both its discovery (3, 4) and the development of the first-generation assays for antigen-specific IgE (5). More recent studies employing X-ray crystallography, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), and other biophysical techniques have elucidated IgE binding sites and kinetics, providing new insights into its structural and functional characteristics.
IgE antibodies play a central role in mediating immediate hypersensitivity reactions, including urticaria, bronchospasm, systemic anaphylaxis, and chronic inflammatory disorders such as rhinitis, atopic dermatitis, and asthma (6). The critical mechanism underlying these responses involves allergen-induced crosslinking of IgE bound to high-affinity FcϵRI receptors on effector cells such as mast cells (MCs), basophils, and eosinophils. This interaction triggers the release of cytokines and inflammatory mediators, including histamine, heparin, tryptase, and prostaglandins (3).
Beyond allergic disease, IgE contributes to host defense against parasitic infections (7–9) and protection from venom toxins (10) (11–14). Emerging evidence also suggests a potential role for IgE in anti-tumor immunity (15–17), autoimmunity (18–21), and respiratory viruses (22–25), underscoring its broader relevance in immune regulation.
This review aims to summarize current knowledge of IgE’s structural and functional properties and to explore its potential protective roles in host defense and non-atopic pathological conditions.
2 The structure of immunoglobulin E and its receptors
IgE is the least abundant immunoglobulin class in serum, with concentrations ranging from 150 to 300 ng/mL (26–28)—approximately a thousand-fold lower than IgG, which averages around 10 mg/mL (29). This extremely low concentration reflects the tight regulation of IgE production and secretion through complex molecular and cellular mechanisms.
Studies of interleukin-4 (IL-4) and interleukin-13 (IL-13) signaling have provided key insights into the regulation of IgE synthesis. When IL-4 and IL-13 engage their receptors on B cells, they activate the Janus kinase 3 (JAK3) and signal transducer and activator of transcription 6 (STAT6) pathways (30), promoting immunoglobulin class-switch recombination (CSR) and inducing IgE production (31–33).
An additional co-stimulatory signal is required for efficient switching to IgE. This occurs through the interaction between CD40 on B cells and CD40 ligand (CD40L) expressed on activated T cells (Figure 1a) (34). Upon activation, T cells upregulate CD40L and secrete IL-4 and IL-13, which together induce transcription of the ϵ heavy-chain gene and initiate IgE class switching in B cells (32, 35–37). Th2 cells drive CSR from IgM+ or IgG+ B cells primarily within germinal centers (GC) of secondary lymphoid tissues. Respectively, follicular helper T (Tfh) cells promote B cell proliferation, affinity maturation, and differentiation into high-affinity IgE-producing cells within GCs (38–40). Among these, IL-4–and IL-21–producing Tfh subsets regulate immunoglobulin class switching and recombination (41). In contrast, Tfh13 cells, a subset of Tfh cells that produce IL-13, drive the production of high-affinity IgE involved in allergic responses and anaphylaxis (39, 42). Hence, targeting Tfh13 cells could offer a different therapeutic approach to reduce the severity of anaphylaxis.
Figure 1. Human immunoglobulin E and its site-specific glycosylation (A) Regulation of immunoglobulin class switching to IgE. DCs attach antigens and present them to native T cells via major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II molecules. Following the activation and proliferation of naive T cells, they transform into Th2 cells. MHC class II molecules facilitate the interaction between B cells and their membrane receptors. Activated Th2 cells trigger the production of IL 4 and IL 13, which elicit IgE synthesis in immature human B cells (31, 32). The mechanism behind this interplay between cells is facilitated by the interaction between cytokines and their receptors, which trigger a signaling cascade involving JAK3 and STAT6 (30). The CD40 receptor on the B-cell interacts with the CD-40 ligand (CD-40L) on the T-cell, another signal required for the switch from isotype Ig to isotype IgE. (B) The structural and glycosylation aspects of IgE are schematically illustrated. The IgE-Fc site-specific glycosylation is shown with closed and open circles, representing complex and oligomannose glycans. Complex-type glycans consist of fucose (red), GlcNAc (blue), mannose (green), galactose (yellow), and sialic acid (pink). Oligomannose-type glycans comprise N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc) and various mannose residues, typically ranging from 5 to 9.
The differentiation of Tfh cells goes through three distinct developmental stages: an initial phase resembling progenitor cells, a fully developed effector phase, and a post-effector Tfh phase that maintains transcriptional and epigenetic traits but does not produce IL-21 (43). Data indicate that the transcription factor FoxP1 plays a crucial role in regulating the progression of Tfh through all these stages, while follicular regulatory T cells (Tfr) provide an extrinsic regulatory mechanism, which is thought to suppress GC B cells and the antibody response (43, 44). Researchers reported that selectively deleting all stages of Tfh cells influenced antibody dynamics at different points during the germinal center reaction in response to a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (43).
Conspicuously, Tfr cells, previously thought to mainly suppress antibody responses, these cells have a critical helper function in promoting food antigen-specific IgE production (45, 46). Specifically, the helper function of Tfr cells is mediated by the cytokines IL-10 and IL-4 (44). Notably, loss of IL-10 signaling in B cells resulted in severely reduced peanut-specific IgE, decreased GC B cell survival, and loss of GC dark zone B cells after allergen sensitization (45, 46). Furthermore, in the mouse model, IL-1R2 deficiency led to greater IL-1R1-dependent Tfr cell activation and expansion (47). Data have indicated that Tfr cells suppressed GC B cell growth and IgG production but allowed strong IgE responses, likely by increasing IL-4+ Tfh cells (47). Together, these findings revise the traditional view of Tfr cells as suppressive, showing they are essential for the development of food antigen-specific IgE and thus play a direct role in food allergy pathogenesis. As a result, targeting Tfr cell-derived IL-4 and IL-10 could be a novel approach for food allergy therapies.
Although distinct stages of Tfh differentiation have been described, the exact mechanism by which a subset of activated CD4+ T cells triggers CXCR5 expression during the early immune response is unclear (48). Moreover, the factors regulating the migration of defined CXCR5+ precursor Tfh (pre-Tfh) cells into B cell follicles within the GC, and their maturation into germinal center Tfh (GC-Tfh) cells, remain insufficiently characterized (48). In contrast, other activated CD4+ T cells pursue divergent developmental paths. The data provided further insight into the differentiation of Tfh cells and their essential function in strengthening humoral immunity. Therefore, understanding the differentiation of Tfh cells is essential for advancing vaccine development, treating autoimmune disorders, and improving cancer immunotherapy (41, 49, 50). Targeting Tfh cells therapeutically is promising but complex, underscoring the need for precise strategies that maximize their benefits while minimizing risks.
Moreover, type 2-polarized memory B cells (MBC2s), characterized by high expression of CD23 and IL-4Rα, and low expression of CD32, have been shown to contribute to the production of allergen-specific IgE in the bloodstream during sublingual immunotherapy for patients with allergic rhinitis and food allergy (51). These cells serve as a major reservoir and an essential source of IgE (51). Investigation of MBC2’s function offers important insights into the persistence of IgE memory, which is detrimental in allergic conditions but may provide protection against venom and helminth infections.
Although CSR was long thought to be restricted to these germinal centers, evidence now indicates that local classes switching to IgE can also occur at sites of allergic inflammation (52). Several studies suggest that mucosal tissues may serve as additional sites for somatic hypermutation and IgE class switching (53–57). Indeed, local production of IgE+ B cells and IgE+ plasma cells have been detected in the nasal mucosa of patients with seasonal and perennial allergic rhinitis (58).
Interestingly, natural IgE production can also occur independently of T cells and germinal centers. In T-cell-deficient and germ-free wild-type mice, IgE synthesis proceeds through mechanisms not dependent on MHC class II (MHC II), though IL-4 may still play a role (59). These naturally produced IgE antibodies can recognize self-antigens and are not necessarily inhibited by regulatory T cells (59).
During the Th2 immune response, activated B cells extend their role beyond producing antibodies. These cells can differentiate into effector B cells (Be2), which secrete IL-4 along with other cytokines (60). These cytokines help in the differentiation of naive CD4+ T cells into Th2 cells (61–63). Subsequently, IL-4 produced by Th2 cells triggers immunoglobulin class switching to IgE on B-cells, which further differentiate into plasma cells (64, 65). This interaction is a reciprocal mechanism of action between these two hematological immune cells that drives specific adaptive immunity responses against various intrinsic and extrinsic antigens.
Although IL-4 and IL-13 are primary cytokines that trigger CSR, reports suggest that IFN-γ, TGF-β, and IL-21 inhibit CSR by directly suppressing germline transcription or antagonizing IL-4 signaling (66). Moreover, TGF-β impairs Tfh2 development via the PI3Kγ/mTOR pathway, thereby protecting against allergic diseases (67). Consequently, balancing these stimulatory and inhibitory signals is crucial for the precise regulation of IgE production and secretion.
Two major forms of IgE are present in circulation: membrane-bound IgE (mIgE), expressed on B cells, and soluble IgE (sIgE), the secreted form found in serum (68, 69). Free sIgE binds to high-affinity Fcϵ receptors (FcϵRs) on effector cells, leading to their sensitization (70). The half-life of circulating sIgE is approximately two days—much shorter than that of IgG, which persists for about 21 days (71). However, IgE exhibits a prolonged tissue half-life, lasting weeks to months, due to its stable binding to FcϵRI on effector cells (72).
Structurally, IgE shares the basic immunoglobulin architecture with other antibody classes, consisting of two identical heavy (H) and two light (L) chains linked by disulfide bonds. Each molecule contains two antigen-binding Fab fragments—each composed of one variable (V) and one constant (C) domain—and a crystallizable Fc region. The Fc portion consists of four constant domains (Cϵ1–Cϵ4) and lacks the hinge region found in IgG, which has only three constant domains (CH1–CH3). While the IgE Fab portion binds to antigens and provides the structural framework for the immense immunological diversity of antibodies, the Fc portion induces potent effector functions (73). IgE elicit effector functions by binding to effector cell receptors, the high-affinity FcϵRI receptor, and the low-affinity FcϵRII/CD23 receptor. The FcϵRI receptor consists of four subunits: α, β, and a homodimeric γ subunit. The FcϵRIα binds to the Fc region of IgE (Fcϵ), whereas the FcϵRIβ and FcRγ subunits are integral to signal transduction (74–76). Cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) structures of both the apo state of FcϵRI and FcϵRI bound to Fcϵ reveal that signal transduction is facilitated by intracellular immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motifs (ITAMs) (76). IgE binding stabilizes receptor conformation and elucidates how receptor clustering or crosslinking by multivalent allergens results in Syk activation and subsequent degranulation (77, 78). Transmembrane interactions among the α, β, and γ subunits determine the spacing and orientation of intracellular ITAMs, which influence Lyn and Syk recruitment and the strength of downstream Ca²+ and MAPK signaling (76, 78, 79). Moreover, ubiquitin-specific protease 5 (USP5) regulates FcϵRIγ stability in mast cells by determining whether it is degraded or stabilized (80). Thus, the USP5-FcϵRIγ interaction could be a therapeutic target for reducing allergic responses (80).
FcϵRI receptor is structurally identical to other members of the FcγR family, while the FcϵRII/CD23 receptor belongs to the C-type (Ca2+-dependent) lectin-like superfamily (81). The absence of a hinge and the presence of the Cϵ2 domain give IgE a more rigid and asymmetrically folded conformation, resulting in lower flexibility compared with IgG (7, 82, 83). IgE maintains a bent structure both in solution and when bound to its high-affinity receptor FcϵRI (84–86).
The Cϵ2 domains are believed to contribute to the prolonged stability of the IgE–FcϵRI complex (87) by stabilizing receptor interactions through conformational changes (88). In contrast to the lower affinity observed in IgG’s interaction with FcγR (Kd≈10–6 to 10–8 M), IgE exhibits a unique 1:1 binding ratio with FcϵR1, demonstrating a high affinity (Kd≈10-10M) (89). The disparities in binding affinity underscore the functional differences between these antibodies. Hence, as a result of its very slow dissociation, free IgE levels remain very low, with a circulatory half-life of only 2–3 days, in contrast to the roughly 3-week half-life of IgG, and this is mainly because IgE rapidly attaches to cells rather than being degraded (90). Accordingly, several studies have reported that IgE can remain bound to FcϵRI for several weeks (7, 90–92). This long-term binding enables sustained sensitization of mast cells and basophils, a property with important clinical implications. For instance, allergic reactions to peanuts have been observed in organ transplant recipients due to donor-derived, mast cell-bound IgE (93, 94).
These findings highlight the unique structural and functional properties of IgE and underscore the potential for therapeutic interventions targeting the IgE–FcϵRI interaction or its binding kinetics.
2.1 Immunoglobulin E glycosylation
Plasma cells, the mature form of B cells, produce immunoglobulins (Igs) as part of the body’s defense against pathogens. Igs and their corresponding Fc receptors are glycoproteins that connect adaptive and innate immune responses. Glycosylation—the attachment of oligosaccharides to the protein backbone—significantly influences the biological functions of antibodies. Two main classes of glycans can attach to proteins: asparagine (N)-linked and serine/threonine (O)-linked glycans (95). N-linked glycosylation is a post-translational modification involving the covalent attachment of a glycan to the asparagine (Asn) residue of a protein within the consensus sequence Asn-X-Ser/Thr/Cys, where X represents any amino acid except proline (96). In the endoplasmic reticulum, 14 glycan units linked to a dolichol phosphate precursor are transferred en bloc to Asn residues in nascent polypeptides (97). These precursor glycans undergo extensive enzymatic modification as they transit through the Golgi apparatus before reaching their intra- and extracellular destinations (98). In mammals, the most common monosaccharides involved in glycan assembly include glucose (Glc), mannose (Man), galactose (Gal), N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc), fucose (Fuc), and sialic acid. Most membrane-bound and secreted proteins undergo glycosylation (99).
Unlike the linear structure of protein backbones, which is genetically encoded, glycan structures are shaped by a complex network involving hundreds of glycogenes (100). These genes encode glycosyltransferases, glycosidases, sugar nucleotide biosynthetic enzymes, transporters, transcription factors, and ion channels (101). Consequently, glycan structure and diversity are determined by the expression levels and localization of these enzymes, the availability of glycoprotein substrates, and the supply of activated sugar donors (102). The resulting structural diversity of glycans—due to extensive branching and variable monosaccharide composition—enables them to modulate a wide range of biological processes, including protein folding, cell–cell communication, signal transduction, and immune function (103). Glycosylation is also a key regulator of antibody stability, half-life (104–110) and overall immune activity (111).
Among antibody classes, IgE is the most heavily glycosylated, with oligosaccharides comprising approximately 12% of its total mass (112–114). Glycosylation is essential for IgE secretion (69); however, further processing of its precursor oligosaccharide (Glc3Man9GlcNAc2) is not required for secretion, allergen recognition, or mast cell activation (115). As discussed above, IgE interacts with innate immune cells— MCs, basophils, eosinophils, dendritic cells (DCs), and monocytes,—through binding of its Fc region to the high-affinity FcϵRI receptor on effector cell surfaces (81, 116, 117). However, the role of FcϵRI on some specific DCs remains ambiguous (118). Upon allergen exposure, IgE bound to FcϵRI is crosslinked, leading to effector cell degranulation and the release of proinflammatory mediators such as histamine, prostaglandins, and leukotrienes (6). These mediators promote vasodilation, increased vascular permeability, bronchoconstriction, leukocyte extravasation, and smooth muscle contraction, driving both the acute and late-phase allergic responses (119). In severe cases, this cascade can result in systemic anaphylaxis.
In addition to FcϵRI, IgE also binds the low-affinity receptor FcϵRII (CD23), which is expressed on B cells, macrophages, DCs, eosinophils and platelets (81, 117). FcϵRII (CD23) exists in both membrane-bound and soluble forms (6). Structural studies by German et al. and Holdom et al. revealed that IgE binds to FcϵRI through its Cϵ3 domain, whereas binding to FcϵRII involves both the Cϵ3 and Cϵ4 domains (120, 121). The conformation of IgE determines its receptor interactions: it binds FcϵRI in an open configuration and CD23 in a closed configuration. Binding to one receptor induces conformational changes that prevent simultaneous binding to the other. Moreover, soluble FcϵRIα fragments and soluble CD23 (sCD23) can competitively inhibit IgE binding to both receptors (116, 122, 123).
Recent studies have shown that CD23 is a key IgE receptor that plays an important role in regulating IgE synthesis and mediating immune responses against intracellular pathogens (124–126). Studies have shown that mice lacking CD23 exhibit increased levels of IgE (127). Furthermore, various research studies have shown that IgE, when bound to antigens, has a greater tendency to attach to CD23 on B cells in vivo, which in turn promotes the formation of antigen-specific T cells and antibodies (128, 129). Plattner et al. (130) reported that administering antigen-complexed IgE multiple times in mice can induce the formation of protective IgG antibodies that target both antigen-specific and non-specific IgE, with the IgE–IgG complex being cleared in a CD23-dependent manner. Notably, even though Endo F1-treated human IgE and untreated human IgE exhibit similar binding to CD23, mice that received immunization with an Endo F1-treated IgE immune complex exhibited lower levels of anti-IgE–IgG antibodies compared to those immunized with an untreated IgE immune complex (131, 132). These findings suggest a unique CD23-IgE interaction that warrants further examination for the development of new IgE-targeted therapies.
Soluble CD23 increases IgE production, especially after class-switch recombination (133). This circulating receptor acts by binding to cells expressing membrane IgE (mIgE) and membrane CD21 (mCD21), promoting their aggregation on B cells, which is crucial for the successful production of IgE (133). Conversely, increased levels of secreted IgE can bind to mCD23, potentially inhibiting further sCD23 release and thereby maintaining homeostasis (133). While sCD23 enhances IgE synthesis, other studies show that targeting CD23 can inhibit IgE production (126), suggesting a complex regulatory network in which soluble and membrane forms of CD23 may have opposing effects on IgE synthesis. Hence, instead of serving as a low-affinity receptor that regulates IgE synthesis, CD23 may function as a glycan-binding receptor in various mammalian species, including cows and mice (134). The carbohydrate recognition domains (CRDs) of cow and mouse CD23 exhibit specific binding to glycans, including mannose, N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc), glucose, and fucose (134). In humans, the absence of glycan-binding activity in CD23 results from evolutionary mutations that disrupt key glycan-binding residues, reducing CD23 function (134). This research shows that CD23 has species-specific glycan-binding properties and highlights its dual role in the immune system as both an IgE regulator and a glycan-binding receptor.
2.2 The role of Fc glycans on IgE activity
Human IgE (hIgE) consists of two heavy chains, each containing seven N-glycosylation sites, whereas mouse IgE (mIgE) contains nine. No evidence supports the presence of O-glycosylation sites on IgE. Among these sites, the oligosaccharides attached to Asn394 in humans and Asn384 in mice are oligomannosidic in nature (135). In contrast, five other hIgE glycosylation sites contain complex-type glycans, while one site remains unoccupied (Figure 1b).
Extensive studies have characterized IgE glycan structures using IgE purified from monoclonal myeloma cells, recombinant mammalian expression systems, and serum samples from healthy donors or patients with IgE myeloma, atopic dermatitis, or hyper-IgE syndrome. Across all sources, oligomannosidic glycans (Man9–Man9) have been consistently identified at Asn394 (88, 112, 114, 121, 135–137).
The glycan attached to Asn394 plays a critical role in the synthesis and biological activity of IgE in mammalian cells (138). This site is homologous to Asn297 on the Fc region of IgG1, where N-glycans are also essential for effector functions (139). IgG-Fc glycans are typically biantennary complex-type structures, characterized by core fucosylation and often modified with bisecting N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc) (140, 141). These antennae may also carry terminal sialic acid residues with variable galactosylation (142). In IgG, the Fc glycan is embedded within the CH2 domain’s hydrophobic core, forming numerous noncovalent interactions with the polypeptide backbone that stabilize Fc conformation (143, 144). Consequently, IgG glycosylation significantly affects molecular stability and effector function. Physiological and pathological conditions that alter Fc glycan structure can shift IgG effector activity.
Similarly, extensive research has focused on how IgE glycosylation affects its structural and functional properties, particularly its interaction with FcϵRI. Björklund et al. reported that deglycosylation impairs IgE–FcϵRI binding (145), whereas other studies found minimal or no impact (146–148). The Asn394 glycan, located on the Cϵ3 domain of IgE, occupies an interstitial region between the Fc fragments. Enzymatic removal of this glycan using EndoF1 disrupts IgE–FcϵRI binding, analogous to the role of the Asn279 glycan in IgG (135). This conformational alteration prevents FcϵRI engagement and thereby suppresses allergic inflammation.
Mutation studies have confirmed the structural and functional significance of the Asn394 glycan (135, 138, 149), indicating that glycosylation is indispensable for binding to FcϵRI receptors. Genetic disruption of this site abolishes IgE-mediated mast cell degranulation, and analogous modification of the mouse Asn384 residue or total enzymatic deglycosylation by PNGase F eliminates FcϵRI binding in vivo and in vitro (135). Remarkably, IgE molecules retaining only the Asn384 glycan site can still trigger anaphylaxis comparable to wild-type IgE, indicating that this site alone is essential for IgE effector function (135). In contrast, glycosylation appears less critical for IgE interaction with the low-affinity receptor CD23. Vercelli et al. demonstrated that enzymatic deglycosylation enhances IgE–CD23 binding, suggesting that glycosylation may hinder this interaction (148). Collectively, these findings indicate that IgE N-glycans differentially regulate receptor interactions: loss of glycosylation promotes a closed IgE conformation favoring CD23 binding while simultaneously reducing FcϵRI affinity.
Indeed, to further emphasize the importance of site-specific IgE glycosylation patterns for treatment outcomes, Bohle et al. (132) indicate that the elimination or alteration of the N394 glycosylation site on IgE prevents omalizumab from binding to IgE, thereby hindering its binding to FcϵRI and CD23 and mitigating allergic reactions. When IgE is either deglycosylated or the N394 site is altered, omalizumab is unable to bind or inhibit IgE’s interaction with CD23 (132). This research further potentiates the importance of IgE glycosylation in the design and function of anti-IgE therapies.
Mass spectrometry analyses by Shade et al. (150) revealed that six glycosylation sites are typically occupied in human IgE: Asn140, Asn168, Asn218, Asn265, Asn371, and Asn394. Among these, Asn394 carries oligomannosidic glycans, while the others contain complex-type structures; Asn383 remains unoccupied, consistent with previous studies (114, 136, 137). These complex glycans are primarily fucosylated and sialylated, though their abundance and structure vary across individuals and disease states. Shade et al. reported that non-atopic IgE contains galactose-terminated complex glycans at Asn140 and Asn265, whereas allergic IgE carries disialylated glycans at Asn168 and Asn265 (150).
Similarly, Plomp et al. found elevated mono- and disialylated glycans in non-myeloma samples, while IgE myeloma patients exhibited increased tri- and tetra-antennary structures and reduced bisecting GlcNAc residues (136). These findings underscore the heterogeneity and disease-dependent variation of IgE glycosylation. Such alterations may influence IgE–FcϵR interactions and downstream immune responses. From a therapeutic perspective, engineering glycosylation of recombinant antibodies to enhance or suppress effector function represents an important and active area of research (151). A deeper understanding of IgE Fc glycan roles in pathology could facilitate the development of novel IgE-targeted therapies.
As with other antibody classes, IgE glycans display extensive heterogeneity. For comparison, the conserved Asn297 of IgG Fc can carry up to 36 distinct glycoforms (152). Among these, terminal sialylation has gained significant attention due to its role in modulating antibody activity (153). Increased sialylation converts IgG from a pro-inflammatory to an anti-inflammatory state (152, 154), and this property underlies the therapeutic efficacy of high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) in autoimmune diseases such as immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP), and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (152, 155–157). Conversely, less-sialylated IgG forms activate Fcγ receptors, promoting pro-inflammatory responses and contributing to autoimmune disorders such as ITP, autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AHA), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), type 1 diabetes, and multiple sclerosis (152, 158, 159).
Shade et al. (150) also highlighted the role of sialylated glycans in IgE-mediated allergy. For instance, desialylation reduced IgE’s ability to induce degranulation without affecting FcϵRI binding or antigen recognition. In parallel, mutating Asn265 and Asn374 did not alter FcϵRI binding or degranulation activity (135, 138). However, when the three N-glycosylation sites within the Cϵ1 domain of the Fab region were mutated, a slight reducetion in degranulation were observed, suggesting that Cϵ1 glycans may influence antigen binding. Expanding on this, enzymatic removal of sialic acid from recombinantly produced human IgE in HEK cells increased binding to CD23-expressing human leukemic B cells in vitro (160). Despite these differences in binding, both sialylated and asialylated human IgE antibodies elicited comparable degranulation in a rat basophilic cell line (161). This suggests that sialic acid plays a predominant pathogenic role in IgE-mediated allergic responses in humans. These findings point to a new therapeutic avenue: targeting IgE-binding sialic acids could initiate a transformative phase in the treatment of IgE-dependent allergies. As such, numerous efforts have targeted sialic acid-interacting lectins (SIGLECs) associated with the IgE-FcϵRI receptor complex for therapeutic applications. Notably, nanoparticles coated with ligands specific to Siglec-8 or Siglec-3, along with the corresponding IgE antigen, have been shown to facilitate the recruitment of Siglec-8 or Siglec-3 to the IgE-FcϵRI receptor complex (162, 163), which triggers dephosphorylation of Syk and a reduction in PSA in vivo. Moreover, in an in vitro setting, the presence of Siglec-3 at the IgE-FcϵRI receptor complex was found to suppress the activation of blood basophils from individuals with peanut allergies when these cells were exposed to peanut extract (164).
Recent studies propose that lectins may modulate IgE function and FcϵRI signaling. Niki et al. demonstrated that galectin-9, a lectin known to inhibit MCs degranulation, binds to IgE glycans and interferes with antigen binding (165). In contrast, galectin-3 can crosslink IgE and FcϵRI, promoting MCs activation (166). Galectin-3 has emerged as a biomarker of allergic disease: Gao et al. reported elevated Gal-3 in eosinophilic asthma, while Riccio et al. identified it as a predictor of favorable responses to omalizumab therapy in severe asthma, correlating with improved airway remodeling and reduced eosinophilic inflammation (167, 168). Recently, Plattner et al. (131) demonstrated that mice immunized with IgE-allergen immune complexes (IgE-ICs) developed glycan-specific anti-IgE autoantibodies. Consequently, these autoantibodies inhibited the sensitization of effector cells, reduced overall IgE levels in the bloodstream, and protected mice from both passive and active IgE sensitization. As a result, this immune response provided cross-protection against various allergens. Furthermore, glycan-specific anti-IgE autoantibodies were found in the sera of both allergic and non-allergic mice (131). Notably, this research demonstrates, in a murine model, that glycan-specific IgG anti-IgE autoantibodies can reduce serum IgE concentration and anaphylactic activity. In a subsequent study, the authors revealed the significant role of glycosylated IgE-ICs in triggering an increased anti-IgE IgG response and a higher production of IgG-secreting plasma cells compared to the deglycosylated IgE-ICs, which showed a marked decrease in IgE clearance and protection of systemic anaphylaxis, indicating that the IgE glycans themselves are the main contributors to the protective effect induced by the IgE-ICs and could further mediate a strong anti-IgE IgG response and control of serum IgE levels (130).
Despite growing evidence, the biological roles of complex glycans in IgE remain less defined than in IgG. Further investigation is needed to elucidate how site-specific glycosylation regulates IgE structure, receptor binding, and immune function, paving the way for glycoengineering approaches to treat allergic and immune-mediated diseases.
3 IgE immune protection role in parasitic infections
Parasitic infections remain a major public health concern in tropical and subtropical regions. According to the World Health Organization, approximately one billion people are infected with various helminth species across sub-Saharan Africa, Asia, and the Americas, imposing a significant burden on healthcare systems and socioeconomic development (169). Bethony et al. estimated that over 25% of the global population is infected with helminths such as Ascaris lumbricoides (roundworm), Trichuris trichiura (whipworm), Necator americanus and Ancylostoma duodenale (hookworms), schistosomes, and filarial worms (170). Although mortality from these infections is relatively low, helminthiasis contributes substantially to morbidity through anemia, malnutrition, and impaired growth and cognition (171). Because helminths are large and often migrate through host tissues, the nature of host defense varies depending on the specific parasite species (172).
Poor sanitation, limited access to clean water, and inadequate hygiene practices are primary drivers of chronic helminth infections in rural regions (173, 174). Interestingly, allergic diseases and asthma have also become increasingly prevalent in both developing and industrialized countries, particularly in urban populations (175–179). These epidemiological observations suggest that altered environmental exposures, in combination with genetic predisposition, contribute to the rise of allergic disorders. The higher incidence of allergic diseases in urban environments has been attributed to reduced exposure to childhood pathogens, smaller family sizes, and lifestyle changes (180).
A growing body of evidence links the global increase in allergic diseases to diminished exposure to helminths during early life (181). Chronic helminth infections can modulate host immunity, promote an anti-inflammatory environment and generalized T-cell hyporesponsiveness (182). This phenomenon is encapsulated by the “hygiene hypothesis,” which proposes that reduced exposure to microbes and parasites in childhood increases susceptibility to allergic and autoimmune diseases (182–184). Experimental studies have shown that helminth administration can suppress autoimmune and allergic inflammation, whereas deworming may exacerbate these conditions (182, 185, 186). Understanding the regulatory mechanisms—particularly anti-inflammatory pathways—induced by helminth infection could provide valuable insights for developing novel therapies against immune-mediated diseases.
Helminth infections and allergic diseases share several immunological features, most notably the induction of Th2-type immune responses characterized by elevated Th2 cytokines, IgE production, and activation of effector cells (187, 188). These responses are associated with increased secretion of IL-4, IL-5, IL-9, IL-13, and IL-21 (189). IL-25 also plays a critical role in Th2 immunity and helminth expulsion by promoting IL-5 and IL-13 expression (190, 191). Although IL-10 is often categorized as a Th2-type cytokine (192, 193), it acts broadly as an immunosuppressive mediator that inhibits both Th1 and Th2 responses via regulatory T cells (194). Thus, cytokines central to Th2 responses (e.g., IL-4, IL-13, IL-21, and IL-25) can simultaneously downregulate Th1- and Th17-type inflammation (189).
IgE also plays a pivotal role in host defense. Parasite-specific IgE binds to high-affinity FcϵRI receptors on MCs and basophils or to low-affinity CD23 receptors on eosinophils, macrophages, DCs, and B cells, promoting parasite recognition and clearance (6, 195). Upon FcϵRI engagement, IgE triggers effector cell degranulation and the release of bioactive mediators that facilitate parasite expulsion (Figure 2) (189, 198). Despite the shared immune mechanisms between helminth infection and allergy, their clinical outcomes differ: IgE-mediated allergic reactions are typically pathological, whereas IgE responses to helminths are protective (199, 200). Numerous studies have demonstrated positive correlations between parasite-specific IgE levels and resistance to infection, supporting a protective role for IgE in helminth immunity (201–207). The first in vivo evidence came from studies showing that passive transfer of monoclonal IgE specific to Schistosoma antigens conferred protection (208). Similarly, elevated parasite-specific IgE levels in Schistosoma haematobium–infected individuals correlated with reduced reinfection rates (205), and IgE responses to S. mansoni were associated with enhanced resistance (209).
Figure 2. Schematic presentation of IgE-mediated immune response mechanism in non-atopic disorders.Non-atopic disorders activate specific innate immune system cells known as activated APCs, including DCs. Since the role of DCs is to bind antigens, they transport those antigens to lymph nodes and present them to naïve T cells. Consequently, DC induces Th2 responses, which initiate the release of specific cytokines (IL-4 and IL-13). These cytokines activate signaling pathways on B cells and help the production of antigen-specific IgE. Cross-linking antigen-specific IgE antibodies with the FcϵRI receptors on effector cells leads to degranulating these innate immune cells. Respectively, several proinflammatory mediators like histamine, tryptase, prostaglandins, and leukotrienes will be released, initiating protection against helminth infections, preventing tumor growth, and increasing antitumor immunity (196). Chronic helminth infection promotes responses such as IL-10, regulatory T cells, and regulatory B cells, which can prevent Th2 responses’ downstream effector phase. Increased levels of suppressive IL-10 cytokines can reduce the production of IgE and promote a switch to IgG4, a type of immunoglobulin not associated with clinical allergies. It has been suggested that IgG allergen complexes could inhibit signaling through the IgE FcϵRI pathway by binding to the Fc receptor (FcγRIIb) (197). MCs and basophils are known to play roles in antibody-mediated diseases (AAID) where autoreactive IgE and FcϵRI aggregating antibodies are present. These antibodies have been implicated in the onset and progression of diseases.
Nkurunungi et al. (210) showed that rural participants from S. mansoni-endemic islands had higher IgE and IgG responses to parasite glycan antigens, including the core β-1,2-xylose and α-1,3-fucose N-glycans, whereas urban participants with less exposure had weaker responses. In addition, in rural areas, individuals infected with S. mansoni had increased glycan-specific IgE responses to active S. mansoni compared to uninfected controls. This research may indicate that IgE undergoes glycosylation-driven structural changes to detect distinct parasite glycans. To further investigate the role of antibody glycosylation in parasite glycan recognition, Adjobimey and Hoerauf showed that chronic helminth infections increase sialylation and bisecting GlcNAc on IgG, possibly indicating a similar mechanism in the IgE antibody response (211). These findings underscore the need for further research into how antibody glycosylation variability influences immune responses and allergy diagnostics in helminth-endemic areas.
It is well known that parasites manifest cross-reactive carbohydrate determinants (CCDs), such as core α1,3-fucose and β1,2-xylose, that mimic host IgE glycans. Additionally, specific glycans attached to helminths promote an IgG-associated Th2 Immune response that mitigates IgE-mediated immunity (160). In this sense, parasites may utilize a mechanism to avoid immune surveillance by exploiting glycosylated IgE-ICs that stimulate the generation of glycan-specific IgG autoantibodies, thereby facilitating the removal of IgE from circulation (130). Furthermore, several studies using monoclonal IgE have indicated that, following parasitic infection, certain parasite antigens, such as excretory/secretory proteins, serve as key immunogenic targets to hinder parasite infection and survival (212, 213), implying a central role of IgE in precisely targeting and neutralizing parasitic threats.
Conspicuously, the immune mechanisms elicited by different helminths vary considerably. Both Heligmosomoides polygyrus (a nematode) and Schistosoma mansoni (a trematode) induce Th2-type immunity in mice, yet their protective strategies differ. In H. polygyrus infection, the Th2 response causes stress and expulsion of the parasite (214), while in S. mansoni infection, Th2 cytokines mitigate Th1-mediated immunopathology rather than eliminate the parasite (215). These examples illustrate that Th2-driven responses may serve either parasite clearance or immune regulation, depending on the infection context (189). Such heterogeneity in parasite biology, infection intensity, timing, and host genetics likely contributes to the variable epidemiological associations between helminth infections and allergic diseases (216).
For example, Ascaris lumbricoides infection has been linked to increased asthma risk, whereas hookworm infection shows a protective association (217). Other intestinal parasites, such as Trichuris trichiura, Enterobius vermicularis, and Strongyloides stercoralis, appear to have no significant effect (217). Since the 1970s, many studies have explored the modulatory effects of helminth infections on allergy and asthma (218–222), with most suggesting that helminths reduce allergic sensitization (223). One proposed mechanism is that helminths induce strong polyclonal IgE production, which elevates total serum IgE and may competitively inhibit allergen-specific IgE binding and effector cell activation (224). This polyclonal activation may represent an immune evasion strategy that allows parasites to avoid host detection (224).
Children with atopic backgrounds have been shown to mount stronger immune responses to helminths yet exhibit lower infection intensities than non-atopic children, suggesting a potential evolutionary advantage of atopy in resisting infection (224). However, Mitre et al. found that the ratio of polyclonal to allergen-specific IgE did not suppress basophil degranulation (225). Elevated IgE levels can upregulate FcϵRI expression, while anti-IgE therapy reduces receptor density, indicating that high total IgE may not effectively compete with allergen-specific IgE for receptor binding (226).
Yazdanbakhsh et al. proposed that some parasite infections induce allergen-specific IgE of low biological activity, incapable of triggering effector cell activation (180). Supporting this, several studies reported that increased IgE targeting CCDs exhibits low functional activity (227, 228). Another mechanism involves helminth-induced production of IgG4, which can compete with IgE for allergen binding. IgG–allergen complexes may engage the inhibitory FcγRIIb receptor, activating phosphatases that dampen IgE–FcϵRI signaling (Figure 2) (197, 229–231).
Recent evidence also highlights IL-10 as a central regulator during chronic helminth infection. Elevated IL-10 levels attenuate basophil responsiveness to IgE stimulation (232), suppress T- and B-cell activation (233), enhance IgG synthesis (234), and promote B-cell differentiation toward IgG4 production (235–237). Collectively, these mechanisms demonstrate that chronic helminth infections induce potent immunoregulatory activity mediated by IL-10 and regulatory T cells (Tregs), which suppress Th2 responses and reduce inflammatory pathology (Figure 2) (238, 239). Hence, it is well established that parasitic diseases elicit strong IgE responses in infected individuals, but IgE-based diagnostics remain ambiguous. New sensitive IgE tests and synthetic peptides now enable better detection of parasite-specific IgE, potentially improving the accuracy of these blood tests (240, 241). Building on these diagnostic developments, it is also important to consider related therapeutic interventions. Therapeutically, monoclonal antibodies targeting IgE, like omalizumab, are used in allergic diseases; their impact on susceptibility to parasitic infections warrants further study (242, 243).
4 IgE in autoimmunity
Studies estimate that autoimmune diseases affect 7–9% of the global population (244, 245). Recent research into gender-based immunological differences reveals that women have a higher incidence of autoimmune diseases than men (246, 247). Central to preventing autoimmunity is immune tolerance, which protects the body from attacking its own antigens (248). When tolerance is breached, the immune system mounts a strong response against self-antigens, leading to autoimmune pathology (248). Autoimmune diseases arise from failures in multiple self-reactivity control mechanisms, involving the activation of innate immune molecules that recognize self or foreign antigens (245).
Regulatory T cells (Tregs), regulatory B cells, their suppressive cytokines, and surface molecules are crucial for maintaining self-tolerance. Dysregulation or loss of function in these cells, due to physiological changes, can promote allergic and autoimmune diseases (249, 250). Additionally, reduced Treg number and function—potentially resulting from decreased exposure to chronic infections—increases Th1 and Th2 activity, raising the risk of these disorders (251, 252).
While allergen-specific IgE antibodies contribute to allergic disease pathogenesis by promoting Th2 immunity, self-reactive IgE also plays a role in autoimmune tissue damage, a hallmark of autoimmunity (253). Interestingly, elevated total or autoreactive IgE levels do not always correlate with increased allergic disease incidence, highlighting the complex role of IgE dysregulation in inflammation (254–256).
B cells contribute to autoimmunity by producing IgE, presenting antigens, and releasing cytokines (250). Plasma B cell proliferation and differentiation depend on IL-6, a potent B-cell activating factor (253). B cells can generate all autoantibody subclasses, including IgE, which initiate autoimmune reactions by binding FcϵR receptors on effector cells. Although the role of IgE in non-atopic disorders is not fully understood (257), evidence indicates that interactions between IgE autoantibodies and FcϵRI receptors on mast cells (MCs) and basophils are key in triggering autoimmune symptoms (Figure 2) (258). Basophils, when activated by IgE-autoantigen complexes, can further promote the differentiation of B cells and the production of autoantibodies, creating a self-perpetuating cycle (259).
Beyond its established role in allergic diseases, IgE’s involvement in autoimmune conditions has gained attention (258). Pathogenic IgE has been implicated in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (260, 261), bullous pemphigoid (BP) (262), atopic dermatitis (AD) (263), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) (264), uveitis (265), systemic sclerosis (266), multiple sclerosis (267), Hashimoto thyroiditis, and Graves disease (268, 269), and chronic spontaneous and inducible urticaria (270, 271). These diseases show immune responses mediated by specific IgE autoantibodies, supporting IgE’s role in autoimmunity (253).
SLE, a systemic autoimmune disorder affecting multiple organs (272, 273), is characterized by immune dysfunction and typical lab findings including hypergammaglobulinemia and IgG antinuclear antibodies (253). Elevated serum IgE levels correlate positively with disease activity in SLE patients (255, 274–276). Henault et al. demonstrated that IgE autoantibodies specific for double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) activate plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs), triggering high interferon-α (IFN-α) release, which amplifies autoimmune damage (19, 277). Anti-dsDNA IgE also enhances pDC phagocytosis via FcϵRI binding, activating Toll-like receptor 9 (TLR9) signaling (277).
IFN-α has been shown to suppress eosinophil granule protein secretion (278) and mast cell histamine release (279). More recently, IgE cross-linking on pDCs inhibits Treg synthesis in vitro, an effect reversed by omalizumab, an anti-IgE monoclonal antibody (245, 258). Omalizumab restores pDC function and Treg homeostasis, suggesting its potential as a treatment for autoimmune diseases with impaired Treg activity.
Unlike allergic diseases, where IgE mediates hypersensitivity, IgE in autoimmune diseases like SLE appears to engage interferon-driven responses to nucleic acids (258). Studies show no increased prevalence of allergic diseases among SLE patients despite elevated IgE (280, 281). Both IgG and IgE autoantibodies share biological activity in SLE, with only specific IgE autoantibodies binding nucleic acids directly or indirectly (282).
Approximately half of SLE patients develop renal complications (283). Anti-dsDNA IgG autoantibodies are well-established diagnostic markers for SLE (253). Dema et al. found a strong association between elevated anti-dsDNA IgE and disease severity, including lupus nephritis (284). Henault et al. confirmed anti-dsDNA IgE as an independent risk factor for SLE activity, regardless of IgG levels (277). IgE autoantibodies also recognize novel autoantigens (APEX nuclease 1, N-methylpurine DNA glycosylase, CAP-Gly domain-containing protein family member 4) not targeted by IgG (284). Pan et al. linked elevated peripheral basophil activity with increased IgE autoantibody production and SLE severity; co-culture experiments showed basophils enhance autoreactive IgE production and promote Th17 differentiation from naïve CD4+ T cells (285). Preclinical mouse models show that IgE deficiency can attenuate lupus-like disease, supporting causality. Notwithstanding the lack of conclusive clinical investigation of anti-IgE strategies in SLE, research on modulating pDCs to reduce IFN signatures increased by IgE complexes is especially relevant for SLE (259, 286, 287).
IgE autoantibodies also contribute to chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU), an autoimmune mast cell-driven disease characterized by hives and angioedema lasting more than six weeks (288). CSU patients exhibit IgG and IgE autoantibodies against FcϵRI, dsDNA, thyroglobulin, and thyroperoxidase (289–292).
Elevated anti-dsDNA IgE in CSU does not correlate with anti-dsDNA IgG levels (293). Notably, IgE autoantibodies targeting the cytokine IL-4 and IL-24 have been linked to CSU severity (294). Omalizumab is a well-established treatment for CSU, and its response patterns can help in differentiating between autoimmune and autoallergic pathways (295, 296). Maurer et al. demonstrated that omalizumab effectively reduces symptoms in CSU patients with anti-thyroid peroxidase (TPO) IgE autoantibodies (297). Furthermore, omalizumab-treated patients with IgE-mediated CSU show faster symptom relief compared to those with IgG-mediated CSU (298).
Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is an autoimmune blistering disease targeting hemidesmosomal proteins BP230 and BP180 in the skin’s dermal-epidermal junction (299, 300). BP serves as a key model for studying IgE-mediated autoimmunity (301). Recent cohort and mechanistic studies continue to highlight the role of IgE in the pathogenesis of BP, showing that a considerable number of patients exhibit measurable levels of anti-BP IgE (302–305). IgE autoantibodies bind BP180, cross-link FcϵRI on mast cells and basophils, triggering degranulation and inflammation (306–308). Approximately 70–90% of BP patients have both IgG and IgE autoantibodies targeting BP180, with levels correlating with disease severity (308, 309). IgE binding to BP180 on keratinocytes induces antigen internalization, release of IL-6 and IL-8, and basement membrane disruption (301).
A recent study indicates that IgE autoantibodies can directly activate keratinocytes and other cells located within tissues, contributing to the onset of organ-specific autoimmune disorders (310). Bao and colleagues, in their study of a preclinical mouse model of BP, demonstrated that deleting Myd88 in Krt14 cells greatly reduces disease severity and lowers serum IL-4 and IL-9. This study shows that keratinocyte-driven inflammation drives the systemic response in BP, highlighting that keratinocytes mediate the effects of autoantibodies (310). It is also reported that IgE-ICs can accumulate in tissues such as the skin and the renal glomeruli, thereby indirectly activating complement or initiating inflammatory pathways that bypass FcϵRI (311). Hence, IgE-ICs can directly affect keratinocytes in BP, extending the mechanistic scope beyond the typical type I allergic responses (311). Omalizumab treatment reduces IgE levels and improves symptoms in BP patients (301). Some studies also report IgE autoantibodies against BP230 without BP180 involvement (312–314).
In summary, beyond its well-known role in allergic inflammation, IgE has emerging and diverse functions in autoimmune diseases. Although IgE plays a pathogenic role in autoimmunity, it also regulates the immune response. For example, natural anti-IgE autoantibodies—present even in healthy individuals—may help regulate IgE activity and maintain immune homeostasis (243, 315). Furthermore, IgE can influence adaptive immune responses by modulating antigen presentation and Treg function. As a result, dysregulation of these processes may contribute to the breakdown of self-tolerance and the development of autoimmunity (21, 258, 315). Besides, activation of FcϵRI by IgE can drive inflammation without causing classic allergic reactions, underscoring the complexity of IgE biology and highlighting the need for continued research to unravel its multifaceted roles in immune regulation. Collectively, these data indicate that it is imperative to stratify patients to identify those most likely to benefit from IgE-targeted therapy (296). Future improvements in assay standardization, mechanistic investigations, and controlled therapeutic trials—especially those focusing on anti-IgE treatments—will determine the role of IgE-targeted approaches in standard protocols for autoimmune diseases (19, 311).
5 The immunosurveillance role of IgE in cancer
Immunosurveillance, the immune system’s ability to detect and eliminate cancer cells, is essential for preventing tumor development. The host’s immune repertoire can mount robust responses against tumor-specific antigens, potentially influencing clinical outcomes. However, tumors often evade immune detection by manipulating the tumor microenvironment, which suppresses effective immune responses (316). A hallmark of cancer is its ability to escape immune recognition and control. For example, Karagiannis et al. reported that elevated IgG4 levels in melanoma patients correlate with poorer survival, suggesting that tumors may promote IgG4 synthesis as a novel immune escape mechanism (317). Similarly, Andreu et al. showed that neoplastic cells can evade humoral immunity by upregulating inhibitory Fc γ receptors and recruiting specific leukocyte subsets that neutralize therapeutic IgG antibodies (318).
Recently, IgE antibodies have gained attention for their potential role in tumor immunosurveillance and as therapeutic agents (15). Immunohistochemical analysis of advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinomas showed a higher prevalence of IgE-positive cells compared to normal mucosa (319). Most IgE-positive cells had morphological features of plasma cells, suggesting a potential role for IgE in antitumor immunity (319). Fu et al. demonstrated that high IgE levels promote antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) against pancreatic cancer cells (320). Multiple studies support that antigen-specific IgE binds to FcϵRI receptors on effector cells to mediate antitumor responses (Figure 2) (321–324). IgE binding to its receptors induces tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) and monocytes to secrete high levels of cytokines, such as TNF-α, IL-1β, and MCP-1, which enhance ADCC against tumor cells (325–328). Genomic and transcriptomic analyses indicate that components of the IgE receptor pathway, including FCER1G, are upregulated in various tumor types and are associated with immune cell infiltration, prognosis, and response to immunotherapy (329). As a result, IgE-mediated immune responses may also limit immunosuppressive interactions between macrophages and regulatory T cells, thereby promoting anti-tumor immunity (327). In addition, IgE also induces antigen cross-presentation by DCs, primes cytotoxic T lymphocyte responses, and supports the development of long-term tumor immunosurveillance (330). Although the protective role of allergic diseases and IgE in cancer has been documented, the exact mechanisms by which allergy-driven inflammation influences tumor development remain unclear and warrant further study (331). The emerging field of allergooncology focuses on IgE-mediated tumor destruction and the development of IgE-based immunotherapies, offering new perspectives and potential treatments for cancer (332, 333).
Epidemiologic studies indicate that individuals with allergic symptoms and elevated IgE levels have a reduced risk of various cancers, including childhood leukemia, pancreatic, brain, ovarian, colorectal, glioma, and gynecological cancers (319, 331, 332, 334–336). Conversely, ultra-low IgE levels may be a biomarker for increased cancer risk (337, 338). Ferastraoaru et al. reported a significant association between selective IgE deficiency and increased cancer risk in both adults and children (339–341). Specific IgE antibodies against tumor-associated antigens have been detected in human serum (320, 342), and mouse models confirm IgE’s protective role against several tumors (321, 343, 344). Although the precise immunological mechanisms remain unclear, current evidence suggests that IgE can mediate tumor cell eradication and hold promise as an anticancer agent (345).
Effector cells expressing FcϵR receptors within the tumor microenvironment face an immunosuppressive milieu that promotes tumor growth, invasion, and progression (346). Yet, immune cell infiltration into tumors correlates with reduced recurrence and improved survival, reflecting ongoing immune surveillance (347). Targeting tumors via IgE-FcϵR interactions on effector cells presents a promising therapeutic strategy. Antigen-specific IgE antibodies against targets like folate receptor alpha (FRα) and HER2/neu have shown enhanced anticancer efficacy by engaging FcϵR-expressing effector cells in the tumor microenvironment (322–324, 348, 349). Notably, MOv18 IgE antibodies targeting FRα improved survival and limited ovarian carcinoma progression more effectively than IgG1 in animal models (322, 324, 348).
MCs accumulate in tumors and their microenvironment, influencing innate and adaptive immunity (350, 351). While MCs promote angiogenesis and are linked with poor prognosis in cancers such as melanoma, pancreatic adenocarcinoma, and colorectal cancer (352–360), they can also enhance antitumor responses in mesothelioma, breast cancer, and other malignancies (361, 362). MC degranulation can impair regulatory T cell activity and promote cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL)–mediated tumor cell killing through tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) release (363, 364). MCs incubated with anti-CD20 IgE antibodies induce lymphoma cell death, demonstrating IgE’s capacity to stimulate effector cells to eradicate tumor cells (365).
Eosinophils, abundant in tumor tissues (tumor-associated tissue eosinophilia, TATE), correlate with better prognoses in various cancers, including esophageal, colorectal, gastric, and Hodgkin lymphoma (366–371). They promote tumor immunity through antibody-dependent mechanisms and modulation of the tumor microenvironment, although their exact protective pathways are not fully understood (370, 372–374). Eosinophil degranulation releases cytotoxic proteins like major basic protein (MBP), contributing to tumor cell death (375). Tumor antigen-specific IgE enhances eosinophil-mediated cytotoxicity, particularly in allergic individuals (324, 376). Basophils, like MCs, express FcϵRI and secrete Th2 cytokines, histamine, and other mediators upon activation, playing key roles in IgE-mediated immune responses and immunotherapies (188).
Recent studies highlight a novel mechanism by which DCs utilize IgE-FcϵRI interactions for cross-presentation of tumor antigens, activating cytotoxic CD8+ T lymphocytes (CTLs) even at low antigen doses. This pathway is independent of MyD88 and IL-12 signaling (330). Passive immunization with tumor-specific IgE and DC-based vaccines enhances antitumor immunity and generates durable memory responses in vivo (330). Interestingly, IL-4—a Th2 cytokine—can inhibit this IgE-mediated cross-presentation, suggesting a feedback mechanism that modulates CTL responses during allergic reactions (377). This IgE-FcϵRI-mediated activation of DCs within the tumor microenvironment may promote robust and lasting adaptive immunity against tumors.
6 Conclusion
Atopic diseases are well-recognized as classical examples of IgE-mediated pathology. However, the role of IgE in non-atopic disorders has recently garnered significant attention within the scientific community. IgE antibodies are increasingly implicated in diseases marked by immune dysregulation, prompting a broader investigation into their diverse immunological functions. While antibody-mediated inflammatory responses play a crucial role in defending against infections and malignancies, dysregulation of these mechanisms can contribute to autoimmune and other pathological conditions.
Glycosylation profoundly influences the structure and function of IgG antibodies, critically modulating their effector activities. Physiological and pathological conditions can alter IgG Fc glycan composition, significantly impacting antibody function (378). This variability is linked to disease outcomes in conditions such as latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection (379), rheumatoid arthritis (105), responses to influenza vaccination (380), dengue hemorrhagic fever (381), and granulomatosis with polyangiitis (382). Notably, IgG exhibits greater glycan heterogeneity than the overall plasma glycome (383), endowing it with unique functional capabilities.
Similarly, IgE antibodies initiate potent effector functions through binding to FcϵRI receptors on effector cells. The Fc region of IgE immobilizes the antibody on these cells, enabling prolonged antigen recognition. Like IgG, IgE Fc N-glycan composition varies between individuals and influences biological activity (384). Despite IgE’s central role in allergic reactions, the correlation between total or allergen-specific IgE levels and clinical allergy is inconsistent (385, 386), with antigen-specific IgE also detected in asymptomatic individuals (385, 387). Recent studies have identified specific glycans at Asn394 and Asn384 in the IgE C3 domain that enhances its ability to trigger allergic responses (135). These oligomannose glycans represent promising targets to modulate allergic reactions therapeutically (135).
Changes in IgE site-specific glycosylation may also underline its pathogenic roles beyond allergies and atopic diseases. Given IgE’s involvement in non-atopic conditions, understanding variations in its glycosylation patterns is critical to defining molecular disease signatures and identifying new therapeutic targets. Further glycoproteomic analyses of IgE glycosylation across diverse pathophysiological states could clarify how these modifications influence disease progression, pinpoint specific Fc glycans associated with pathology, and elucidate their biological functions. This knowledge may enable the design of antibodies with tailored glycan structures and enhanced therapeutic efficacy in both in vivo and in vitro settings.
Author contributions
KT: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization. AG: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. RA: Writing – review & editing. MC: Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This work was supported by grants from NIH (R01AI167933 to MC, R01AI179741 to RA, and T32HL116275 to AG), and the Mitzutani Foundation (250003 to RA).
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge all the scientists whose findings contributed to this review directly or indirectly. We apologize to those articles that are not cited due to space and editorial restrictions.
Conflict of interest
The authors declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Glossary
AAID: Antibody-mediated autoimmune diseases
AD: Atopic Dermatitis
ADCC: Antibody Dependent Cellular Cytotoxicity
AE: Angioedema
AHA: Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia (AHA)
Anti-dsDNA: Anti-Double-Stranded DNA
APCs: Antigen-Presenting Cells
ASN: Asparagine
BP: Bullous Pemphigoid
BP180: Bullous Pemphigoid 180
BP230: Bullous Pemphigoid 230
Bregs: Regulatory B cells
CH: Constant Heavy Chain
CIDP: Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy
CindU: Chronic Inducible Urticaria
CSR: Class Switch Recombination
CSU: Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria
CTL: Cytotoxic T lymphocyte
Cγ2: Constant Gama Domain 2
Cϵ2: Constant Epsilon Domain 2
DC: Dendritic Cell
dsDNA: Double-stranded DNA
EndoF1: Endoglycosidase F1
Fab: Antigen Binding Fragment
FAP: Facilitated Antigen Presentation
Fc: Crystallizable Fragment
FcγRs: Crystallizable Fragment Gama Receptors
FcγRIIb: Crystallizable Fragment Gama Receptors IIb
FcϵRI: Crystallizable Fragment Epsilon Receptors I
FcϵRII: Crystallizable Fragment Epsilon Receptors II
GlcNAc: N-Acetylglucosamine
HER2/neu: Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2
hIgE: Human Immunoglobulin E
HL: Hodgkin Lymphoma
HR: Hazard Ratio
IFN-α: Interferon-α
Ig: Immunoglobulin
IgA: Immunoglobulin A
IgD: Immunoglobulin D
IgE: Immunoglobulin E
IgG: Immunoglobulin G
IgG1: Immunoglobulin G1
IgG4: Immunoglobulin G4
IgM: Immunoglobulin M
Igs: Immunoglobulins
IL-2: Interleukin 2
IL-4: Interleukin 4
IL-5: Interleukin 5
IL-6: Interleukin 6
IL-8: Interleukin 8
IL-9: Interleukin 9
IL-10: Interleukin 10
IL-13: Interleukin 13
IL-17: Interleukin 17
IL-21: Interleukin 21
IL-24: Interleukin 24
IL-25: Interleukin 25
ITP: Immune Thrombocytopenia
IVIG: Intravenous Immunoglobulins
JAK3: Janus Kinase 3
mAb: Monoclonal Antibody
MCHII: Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I
MCs: Mastocytes
mIgE: Mouse Immunoglobulin E
mbIgE: Membrane Bound Immunoglobulin E
NMR: Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
pDCs: Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cells
RA: Rheumatoid Arthritis
sCD23: Soluble CD23
sIgE: Soluble Immunoglobulin E
SLE: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
STAT6: Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription 6
TATE: Tumor-Associated Tissue Toll-Like Receptor 9
TNF-α: Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha
Tregs: Regulatory T cells
VL: Variable Light Chains
WT: Wild-Type.
References
1. Platts-Mills TAE, Heymann PW, Commins SP, and Woodfolk JA. The discovery of IgE 50 years later. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. (2016) 116:179–82. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2016.01.003
2. Ishizaka K, Ishizaka T, and Hornbrook MM. Physicochemical properties of reaginic antibody. V. Correlation of reaginic activity wth gamma-E-globulin antibody. . J Immunol Baltim Md 1950. (1966) 97:840–53.
3. Johansson SGO. The history of igE: from discovery to 2010. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. (2011) 11:173–7. doi: 10.1007/s11882-010-0174-3
4. Stanworth DR, Humphrey JH, Bennich H, and Johansson SGO. Specific inhibition of the prausnitzküstner reaction by an atypical human myeloma protein. Lancet. (1967) 290:330–2. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(67)90171-7
5. Wide L, Bennich H, and Johansson SGO. Diagnosis of allergy by an in-vitro test for allergen antibodies. Lancet. (1967) 290:1105–7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(67)90615-0
6. Gould HJ and Sutton BJ. IgE in allergy and asthma today. Nat Rev Immunol. (2008) 8:205–17. doi: 10.1038/nri2273
7. Gould HJ, Sutton BJ, Beavil AJ, Beavil RL, McCloskey N, Coker HA, et al. The biology of igE and the basis of allergic disease. Annu Rev Immunol. (2003) 21:579–628. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.21.120601.141103
8. Dombrowicz D, Flamand V, Brigman KK, Koller BH, and Kinet JP. Abolition of anaphylaxis by targeted disruption of the high affinity immunoglobulin E receptor α chain gene. Cell. (1993) 75:969–76. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90540-7
9. Matsumoto M, Sasaki Y, Yasuda K, Takai T, Muramatsu M, Yoshimoto T, et al. IgG and igE collaboratively accelerate expulsion of strongyloides venezuelensis in a primary infection. Infect Immun. (2013) 81:2518–27. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00285-13
10. Marichal T, Starkl P, Reber LL, Kalesnikoff J, Oettgen HC, Tsai M, et al. A beneficial role for immunoglobulin E in host defense against honeybee venom. Immunity. (2013) 39:963–75. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.10.005
11. Palm NW, Rosenstein RK, Yu S, Schenten DD, Florsheim E, and Medzhitov R. Bee venom phospholipase A2 induces a primary type 2 response that is dependent on the receptor ST2 and confers protective immunity. Immunity. (2013) 39:976–85. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.10.006
12. Giannetti MP, Nicoloro-SantaBarbara J, Godwin G, Middlesworth J, Espeland A, and Castells MC. Drug and venom allergy in mastocytosis. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. (2023) 43:699–710. doi: 10.1016/j.iac.2023.04.002
13. Starkl P, Gaudenzio N, Marichal T, Reber LL, Sibilano R, Watzenboeck ML, et al. IgE antibodies increase honeybee venom responsiveness and detoxification efficiency of mast cells. Allergy. (2022) 77:499–512. doi: 10.1111/all.14852
14. Elst J, De Puysseleyr LP, Ebo DG, Faber MA, Van Gasse AL, van der Poorten MLM, et al. Overexpression of fcϵRI on bone marrow mast cells, but not MRGPRX2, in clonal mast cell disorders with wasp venom anaphylaxis. Front Immunol. (2022) 25:835618. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.835618
15. Leoh LS, Daniels-Wells TR, and Penichet ML. IgE immunotherapy against cancer. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. (2015) 388:109–49.
16. Guo S, Fan X, Li W, Bao J, Ma E, and Jin H. Correlation between allergy and cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. (2025) 15:34901. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-18646-y
17. Matricardi PM. The very low igE producer: allergology, genetics, immunodeficiencies, and oncology. Biomedicines. (2023) 11:1378. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11051378
18. Moñino-Romero S, Kortekaas Krohn I, Xiang YK, Altrichter S, Baumann K, Belasri H, et al. Understanding IgE-mediated autoimmunity and autoallergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2025), S0091674925011157. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2025.10.025
19. Charles N, Kortekaas-Krohn I, Kocaturk E, Scheffel J, Altrichter S, Steinert C, et al. Autoreactive IgE: Pathogenic role and therapeutic target in autoimmune diseases. Allergy. (2023) 78:3118–35. doi: 10.1111/all.15843
20. Loucks A, Maerz T, Hankenson K, Moeser A, and Colbath A. The multifaceted role of mast cells in joint inflammation and arthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. (2023) 31:567–75. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2023.01.005
21. Olewicz-Gawlik A and Kowala-Piaskowska A. Self-reactive IgE and anti-IgE therapy in autoimmune diseases. Front Pharmacol. (2023) 14:1112917. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1112917
22. Giménez-Orenga K, Pierquin J, Brunel J, Charvet B, Martín-Martínez E, Perron H, et al. HERV-W ENV antigenemia and correlation of increased anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin levels with post-COVID-19 symptoms. Front Immunol. (2022) 13:1020064. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1020064
23. Portilho AI, Silva VO, Da Costa HHM, Yamashiro R, de Oliveira IP, de Campos IB, et al. An unexpected IgE anti-receptor binding domain response following natural infection and different types of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. Sci Rep. (2024) 14:20003. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-71047-5
24. de la Poza JFD, Parés AR, Aparicio-Calvente I, Blanco IB, Masmitjà JG, Berenguer-Llergo A, et al. Frequency of IgE antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 RBD protein across different disease severity COVID19 groups. Virol J. (2025) 22:58. doi: 10.1186/s12985-025-02677-y
25. Plūme J, Galvanovskis A, Šmite S, Romanchikova N, Zayakin P, and Linē A. Early and strong antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 predict disease severity in COVID-19 patients. J Transl Med. (2022) 20:176. doi: 10.1186/s12967-022-03382-y
26. King CL, Poindexter RW, Ragunathan J, Fleisher TA, Ottesen EA, and Nutman TB. Frequency analysis of IgE-secreting B lymphocytes in persons with normal or elevated serum IgE levels. J Immunol Baltim Md. (1950) 146:1478–83.
27. Ghory AC, Patterson R, Roberts M, and Suszko I. In vitro IgE formation by peripheral blood lymphocytes from normal individuals and patients with allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis. Clin Exp Immunol. (1980) 40:581–5.
28. Johansson SGO, RAISED LEVELS OFA, and NEW IMMUNOGLOBULIN CLASS. (IgND) IN ASTHMA. Lancet. (1967) 290:951–3. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(67)90792-1
30. Jiang H, Harris MB, and Rothman P. IL-4/IL-13 signaling beyond JAK/STAT. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2000) 105:1063–70. doi: 10.1067/mai.2000.107604
31. Lebman DA and Coffman RL. Interleukin 4 causes isotype switching to IgE in T cell-stimulated clonal B cell cultures. J Exp Med. (1988) 168:853–62. doi: 10.1084/jem.168.3.853
32. Punnonen J and de Vries JE. IL-13 induces proliferation, Ig isotype switching, and Ig synthesis by immature human fetal B cells. J Immunol Baltim Md. (1950) 152:1094–102.
33. Xiong S, Jia Y, and Liu C. IgE-expressing long-lived plasma cells in persistent sensitization. Front Pediatr. (2022) 10:979012. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.979012
34. Iciek LA, Delphin SA, and Stavnezer J. CD40 cross-linking induces Ig epsilon germline transcripts in B cells via activation of NF-kappaB: synergy with IL-4 induction. J Immunol Baltim Md. (1950)158:4769–79.
35. Coffman RL and Carty J. A T cell activity that enhances polyclonal IgE production and its inhibition by interferon-gamma. J Immunol Baltim Md. (1950) 136:949–54.
36. Jabara HH, Fu SM, Geha RS, and Vercelli D. CD40 and IgE: synergism between anti-CD40 monoclonal antibody and interleukin 4 in the induction of IgE synthesis by highly purified human B cells. J Exp Med. (1990) 172:1861–4. doi: 10.1084/jem.172.6.1861
37. Shapira SK, Vercelli D, Jabara HH, Fu SM, and Geha RS. Molecular analysis of the induction of immunoglobulin E synthesis in human B cells by interleukin 4 and engagement of CD40 antigen. J Exp Med. (1992) 175:289–92. doi: 10.1084/jem.175.1.289
38. Kobayashi T, Iijima K, Dent AL, and Kita H. Follicular helper T cells mediate IgE antibody response to airborne allergens. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2017) 139:300–13. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2016.04.021
39. Gowthaman U, Chen JS, Zhang B, Flynn WF, Lu Y, Song W, et al. Identification of a T follicular helper cell subset that drives anaphylactic IgE. Science. (2019) 365:eaaw6433. doi: 10.1126/science.aaw6433
40. Lama JK and Kita H. TFH cells regulate antibody affinity and determine the outcomes of anaphylaxis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2022) 150:1042–4. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2022.08.018
41. Crotty S. T follicular helper cell biology: A decade of discovery and diseases. Immunity. (2019) 50:1132–48. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2019.04.011
42. Lama JK, Iijima K, Kobayashi T, and Kita H. Blocking the inhibitory receptor programmed cell death 1 prevents allergic immune response and anaphylaxis in mice. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2022) 150:178–91. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2022.01.014
43. Podestà MA, Cavazzoni CB, Hanson BL, Bechu ED, Ralli G, Clement RL, et al. Stepwise differentiation of follicular helper T cells reveals distinct developmental and functional states. Nat Commun. (2023) 14:7712. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-43427-4
44. Chen Q, Abdi AM, Luo W, Yuan X, and Dent AL. T follicular regulatory cells in food allergy promote IgE via IL-4. JCI Insight. (2024) 9:e171241. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.171241
45. Xie MM, Chen Q, Liu H, Yang K, Koh B, Wu H, et al. T follicular regulatory cells and IL-10 promote food antigen-specific IgE. J Clin Invest. (2020) 130:3820–32. doi: 10.1172/JCI132249
46. Sokolova S and Grigorova IL. Follicular regulatory T cell subsets in mice and humans: origins, antigen specificity and function. Int Immunol. (2023) 35:583–94. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxad031
47. Engeroff P, Belbezier A, Vaineau R, Fourcade G, Lujan HD, Bellier B, et al. IL-1R2 expression in tfr cells controls allergic anaphylaxis by regulating igG versus igE responses. Allergy. (2025) 80:2636–9. doi: 10.1111/all.16437
48. Schroeder AR, Zhu F, and Hu H. Stepwise Tfh cell differentiation revisited: new advances and long-standing questions. Fac Rev. (2021) 10:3. doi: 10.12703/r/10-3
49. Yang Q, Zhang F, Chen H, Hu Y, Yang N, Yang W, et al. The differentiation courses of the Tfh cells: a new perspective on autoimmune disease pathogenesis and treatment. Biosci Rep. (2024) 44:BSR20231723. doi: 10.1042/BSR20231723
50. Hou Y, Cao Y, He Y, Dong L, Zhao L, Dong Y, et al. SIRT3 negatively regulates TFH-cell differentiation in cancer. Cancer Immunol Res. (2024) 12:891–904. doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-23-0786
51. Koenig JFE, Knudsen NPH, Phelps A, Bruton K, Hoof I, Lund G, et al. Type 2-polarized memory B cells hold allergen-specific IgE memory. Sci Transl Med. (2024) 16:eadi0944. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.adi0944
52. Cameron L, Gounni AS, Frenkiel S, Lavigne F, Vercelli D, and Hamid Q. SϵSμ and SϵSγ Switch circles in human nasal mucosa following ex vivo allergen challenge: evidence for direct as well as sequential class switch recombination. J Immunol. (2003) 171:3816–22. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.171.7.3816
53. Coker HA, Durham SR, and Gould HJ. Local somatic hypermutation and class switch recombination in the nasal mucosa of allergic rhinitis patients. J Immunol. (2003) 171:5602–10. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.171.10.5602
54. Gould HJ, Takhar P, Harries HE, Durham SR, and Corrigan CJ. Germinal-centre reactions in allergic inflammation. Trends Immunol. (2006) 27:446–52. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2006.08.007
55. Gevaert P, Nouri-Aria KT, Wu H, Harper CE, Takhar P, Fear DJ, et al. Local receptor revision and class switching to IgE in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. Allergy. (2013) 68:55–63. doi: 10.1111/all.12054
56. Takhar P, Corrigan CJ, Smurthwaite L, O’Connor BJ, Durham SR, Lee TH, et al. Class switch recombination to IgE in the bronchial mucosa of atopic and nonatopic patients with asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2007) 119:213–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2006.09.045
57. Takhar P, Smurthwaite L, Coker HA, Fear DJ, Banfield GK, Carr VA, et al. Allergen drives class switching to igE in the nasal mucosa in allergic rhinitis. J Immunol. (2005) 174:5024–32. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.174.8.5024
58. KleinJan A, Vinke JG, Severijnen LWFM, and Fokkens WJ. Local production and detection of (specific) IgE in nasal B-cells and plasma cells of allergic rhinitis patients. Eur Respir J. (2000) 15:491–7. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-3003.2000.15.11.x
59. McCoy KD, Harris NL, Diener P, Hatak S, Odermatt B, Hangartner L, et al. Natural igE production in the absence of MHC class II cognate help. Immunity. (2006) 24:329–39. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2006.01.013
60. Harris DP, Haynes L, Sayles PC, Duso DK, Eaton SM, Lepak NM, et al. Reciprocal regulation of polarized cytokine production by effector B and T cells. Nat Immunol. (2000) 1:475–82. doi: 10.1038/82717
61. Song Z, Yuan W, Zheng L, Wang X, Kuchroo VK, Mohib K, et al. B cell IL-4 drives th2 responses in vivo, ameliorates allograft rejection, and promotes allergic airway disease. Front Immunol. (2022) 13:762390. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.762390
62. Hurdayal R, Ndlovu HH, Revaz-Breton M, Parihar SP, Nono JK, Govender M, et al. IL-4-producing B cells regulate T helper cell dichotomy in type 1- and type 2-controlled diseases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. (2017) 114:E8430–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1708125114
63. Hammad H, Plantinga M, Deswarte K, Pouliot P, Willart MAM, Kool M, et al. Inflammatory dendritic cells–not basophils–are necessary and sufficient for induction of Th2 immunity to inhaled house dust mite allergen. J Exp Med. (2010) 207:2097–111. doi: 10.1084/jem.20101563
64. Looney TJ, Lee JY, Roskin KM, Hoh RA, King J, Glanville J, et al. Human B-cell isotype switching origins of IgE. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2016) 137:579–86. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2015.07.014
65. He JS, Narayanan S, Subramaniam S, Ho WQ, Lafaille JJ, and Curotto de Lafaille MA. Biology of IgE production: IgE cell differentiation and the memory of IgE responses. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. (2015) 388:1–19.
66. Mohr E, Cunningham AF, Toellner KM, Bobat S, Coughlan RE, Bird RA, et al. IFN-{gamma} produced by CD8 T cells induces T-bet-dependent and -independent class switching in B cells in responses to alum-precipitated protein vaccine. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. (2010) 107:17292–7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1004879107
67. Haque TT, Weissler KA, Schmiechen Z, Laky K, Schwartz DM, Li J, et al. TGFβ prevents IgE-mediated allergic disease by restraining T follicular helper 2 differentiation. Sci Immunol. (2024) 9:eadg8691. doi: 10.1126/sciimmunol.adg8691
68. Edwalds-Gilbert G. Alternative poly(A) site selection in complex transcription units: means to an end? Nucleic Acids Res. (1997) 25:2547–61.
69. Venkitaraman AR, Williams GT, Dariavach P, and Neuberger MS. The B-cell antigen receptor of the five immunoglobulin classes. Nature. (1991) 352:777–81. doi: 10.1038/352777a0
70. Oettgen HC. Fifty years later: Emerging functions of IgE antibodies in host defense, immune regulation, and allergic diseases. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2016) 137:1631–45. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2016.04.009
71. Waldmann TA. Disorders of immunoglobulin metabolism. N Engl J Med. (1969) 281:1170–7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM196911202812107
72. Hazebrouck S, Canon N, and Dreskin SC. The effector function of allergens. Front Allergy. (2022) 3:818732. doi: 10.3389/falgy.2022.818732
73. Wu LC and Zarrin AA. The production and regulation of IgE by the immune system. Nat Rev Immunol. (2014) 14:247–59. doi: 10.1038/nri3632
74. Deng M, Du S, Hou H, and Xiao J. Structural insights into the high-affinity IgE receptor FcϵRI complex. Nature. (2024) 633:952–9. doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07864-5
75. Eggel A and Jardetzky TS. Structural and functional insights into igE receptor interactions and disruptive inhibition. Immunol Rev. (2025) 331:e70031. doi: 10.1111/imr.70031
76. Zhang Z, Yui M, Ohto U, and Shimizu T. Architecture of the high-affinity immunoglobulin E receptor. Sci Signal. (2024) 17:eadn1303. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.adn1303
77. Jensen RK, Miehe M, Gandini R, Jørgensen MH, Spillner E, and Andersen GR. Cryo-EM structure of fcϵRI bound igE reveals multiple defined conformations of the fab-fc hinge. Allergy. (2025). doi: 10.1111/all.70132
78. Travers T, Kanagy WK, Mansbach RA, Jhamba E, Cleyrat C, Goldstein B, et al. Combinatorial diversity of Syk recruitment driven by its multivalent engagement with FcϵRIγ. Mol Biol Cell. (2019) 30:2331–47. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E18-11-0722
79. Kanagy WK, Cleyrat C, Fazel M, Lucero SR, Bruchez MP, Lidke KA, et al. Docking of Syk to FcϵRI is enhanced by Lyn but limited in duration by SHIP1. Mol Biol Cell. (2022) 33:ar89. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E21-12-0603
80. Zhou ZW, Xu XT, Liang QN, Zhou YM, Hu WZ, Liu S, et al. USP5 deubiquitylates and stabilizes FcϵRIγ to enhance IgE-induced mast cell activation and allergic inflammation. Sci Signal. (2025) 18:eadr3411. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.adr3411
81. Sutton BJ and Davies AM. Structure and dynamics of IgE-receptor interactions: FcϵRI and CD23/FcϵRII. Immunol Rev. (2015) 268:222–35. doi: 10.1111/imr.12340
82. Oi VT, Vuong TM, Hardy R, Reidler J, Dangl J, Herzenberg LA, et al. Correlation between segmental flexibility and effector function of antibodies. Nature. (1984) 307:136–40. doi: 10.1038/307136a0
83. Zheng Y, Shopes B, Holowka D, and Baird B. Dynamic conformations compared for IgE and IgG1 in solution and bound to receptors. Biochemistry. (1992) 31:7446–56. doi: 10.1021/bi00148a004
84. Davis KG, Glennie M, Harding SE, and Burton DR. A model for the solution conformation of rat IgE. Biochem Soc Trans. (1990) 18:935–6. doi: 10.1042/bst0180935
85. Beavil AJ, Young RJ, Sutton BJ, and Perkins SJ. Bent domain structure of recombinant human igE-fc in solution by X-ray and neutron scattering in conjunction with an automated curve fitting procedure. Biochemistry. (1995) 34:14449–61. doi: 10.1021/bi00044a023
86. Zheng Y, Shopes B, Holowka D, and Baird B. Conformations of IgE bound to its receptor Fc.epsilon.RI and in solution. Biochemistry. (1991) 30:9125–32. doi: 10.1021/bi00102a002
87. McDonnell JM, Calvert R, Beavil RL, Beavil AJ, Henry AJ, Sutton BJ, et al. The structure of the IgE Cepsilon2 domain and its role in stabilizing the complex with its high-affinity receptor FcepsilonRIalpha. Nat Struct Biol. (2001) 8:437–41. doi: 10.1038/87603
88. Wan T, Beavil RL, Fabiane SM, Beavil AJ, Sohi MK, Keown M, et al. The crystal structure of IgE Fc reveals an asymmetrically bent conformation. Nat Immunol. (2002) 3:681–6. doi: 10.1038/ni811
89. McDonnell JM, Dhaliwal B, Sutton BJ, and Gould HJ. IgE, igE receptors and anti-igE biologics: protein structures and mechanisms of action. Annu Rev Immunol. (2023) 41:255–75. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-061020-053712
90. Kanagaratham C, El Ansari YS, Lewis OL, and Oettgen HC. IgE and igG antibodies as regulators of mast cell and basophil functions in food allergy. Front Immunol. (2020) 11:603050. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.603050
91. Kubo S, Nakayama T, Matsuoka K, Yonekawa H, and Karasuyama H. Long term maintenance of igE-mediated memory in mast cells in the absence of detectable serum igE. J Immunol. (2003) 170:775–80. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.170.2.775
92. Lawrence MG, Woodfolk JA, Schuyler AJ, Stillman LC, Chapman MD, and Platts-Mills TAE. Half-life of IgE in serum and skin: Consequences for anti-IgE therapy in patients with allergic disease. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2017) 139:422–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2016.04.056
93. Legendre C, Caillat-Zucman S, Samuel D, Morelon S, Bismuth H, Bach JF, et al. Transfer of symptomatic peanut allergy to the recipient of a combined liver-and-kidney transplant. N Engl J Med. (1997) 337:822–5. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199709183371204
94. Castells M and Boyce J. Transfer of peanut allergy by a liver allograft. N Engl J Med. (1998) 338:202–3. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199801153380319
95. Lebrilla CB and An HJ. The prospects of glycanbiomarkers for the diagnosis of diseases. Mol Biosyst. (2009) 5:17–20. doi: 10.1039/B811781K
96. Schwarz F and Aebi M. Mechanisms and principles of N-linked protein glycosylation. Curr Opin Struct Biol. (2011) 21:576–82. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2011.08.005
97. Abu-Qarn M, Eichler J, and Sharon N. Not just for Eukarya anymore: protein glycosylation in Bacteria and Archaea. Curr Opin Struct Biol. (2008) 18:544–50. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2008.06.010
98. Helenius A and Aebi AM. Intracellular functions of N-linked glycans. Science. (2001) 291:2364–9. doi: 10.1126/science.291.5512.2364
99. Zielinska DF, Gnad F, Wiśniewski JR, and Mann M. Precision mapping of an in vivo N-glycoproteome reveals rigid topological and sequence constraints. Cell. (2010) 141:897–907. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.04.012
100. Lauc G, Rudan I, Campbell H, and Rudd PM. Complex genetic regulation of proteinglycosylation. Mol Biosyst. (2010) 6:329–35. doi: 10.1039/B910377E
101. Abbott KL, Nairn AV, Hall EM, Horton MB, McDonald JF, Moremen KW, et al. Focused glycomic analysis of the N -linked glycan biosynthetic pathway in ovarian cancer. PROTEOMICS. (2008) 8:3210–20. doi: 10.1002/pmic.200800157
102. Moremen KW, Tiemeyer M, and Nairn AV. Vertebrate protein glycosylation: diversity, synthesis and function. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. (2012) 13:448–62. doi: 10.1038/nrm3383
103. Marth JD and Grewal PK. Mammalian glycosylation in immunity. Nat Rev Immunol. (2008) 8:874–87. doi: 10.1038/nri2417
104. Arnold JN, Wormald MR, Sim RB, Rudd PM, and Dwek RA. The impact of glycosylation on the biological function and structure of human immunoglobulins. Annu Rev Immunol. (2007) 25:21–50. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.25.022106.141702
105. Parekh RB, Dwek RA, Sutton BJ, Fernandes DL, Leung A, Stanworth D, et al. Association of rheumatoid arthritis and primary osteoarthritis with changes in the glycosylation pattern of total serum IgG. Nature. (1985) 316:452–7. doi: 10.1038/316452a0
106. Anthony RM, Wermeling F, and Ravetch JV. Novel roles for the IgG Fc glycan: Fc glycan determines IgG antibody function. Ann N Y Acad Sci. (2012) 1253:170–80. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06305.x
107. Anthony RM, Wermeling F, Karlsson MCI, and Ravetch JV. Identification of a receptor required for the anti-inflammatory activity of IVIG. Proc Natl Acad Sci. (2008) 105:19571–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0810163105
108. Royle L, Roos A, Harvey DJ, Wormald MR, Van Gijlswijk-Janssen D, Redwan ERM, et al. Secretory igA N- and O-glycans provide a link between the innate and adaptive immune systems. J Biol Chem. (2003) 278:20140–53. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M301436200
109. Basset C, Devauchelle V, Durand V, Jamin C, Pennec YL, Youinou P, et al. Glycosylation of immunoglobulin A influences its receptor binding: glycosylation of igA. Scand J Immunol. (1999) 50:572–9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3083.1999.00628.x
110. Goetze AM, Liu YD, Zhang Z, Shah B, Lee E, Bondarenko PV, et al. High-mannose glycans on the Fc region of therapeutic IgG antibodies increase serum clearance in humans. Glycobiology. (2011) 21:949–59. doi: 10.1093/glycob/cwr027
111. Rudd PM, Elliott T, Cresswell P, Wilson IA, and Dwek RA. Glycosylation and the immune system. Science. (2001) 291:2370–6. doi: 10.1126/science.291.5512.2370
112. Dorrington KJ and Bennich HH. Structure-function relationships in human immunoglobulin E. Immunol Rev. (1978) 41:3–25. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065X.1978.tb01458.x
113. Baenziger J, Kornfeld S, and Kochwa S. Structure of the carbohydrate units of IgE immunoglobulin. I. Over-all composition, glycopeptide isolation, and structure of the high mannose oligosaccharide unit. J Biol Chem. (1974) 249:1889–96. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)42869-X
114. Arnold JN, Radcliffe CM, Wormald MR, Royle L, Harvey DJ, Crispin M, et al. The glycosylation of human serum igD and igE and the accessibility of identified oligomannose structures for interaction with mannan-binding lectin. J Immunol. (2004) 173:6831–40. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.173.11.6831
115. Granato D and Neeser J. Effect of trimming inhibitors on the secretion and biological activity of a murine IgE monoclonal antibody. Mol Immunol. (1987) 24:849–55. doi: 10.1016/0161-5890(87)90187-8
116. Platzer B, Ruiter F, van der Mee J, and Fiebiger E. Soluble IgE receptors—Elements of the IgE network. Immunol Lett. (2011) 141:36–44. doi: 10.1016/j.imlet.2011.08.004
117. Joseph M, Gounni AS, Kusnierz JP, Vorng H, Sarfati M, Kinet JP, et al. Expression and functions of the high-affinity IgE receptor on human platelets and megakaryocyte precursors. Eur J Immunol. (1997) 27:2212–8. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830270914
118. Shin JS and Greer AM. The role of FcϵRI expressed in dendritic cells and monocytes. Cell Mol Life Sci CMLS. (2015) 72:2349–60. doi: 10.1007/s00018-015-1870-x
119. Holgate ST and Church MK. Control of mediator release from mast cells. Clin Allergy. (1982) 12 Suppl:5–13. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.1982.tb03293.x
120. Garman SC, Wurzburg BA, Tarchevskaya SS, Kinet JP, and Jardetzky TS. Structure of the Fc fragment of human IgE bound to its high-affinity receptor FcϵRIα. Nature. (2000) 406:259–66. doi: 10.1038/35018500
121. Holdom MD, Davies AM, Nettleship JE, Bagby SC, Dhaliwal B, Girardi E, et al. Conformational changes in IgE contribute to its uniquely slow dissociation rate from receptor FcεRI. Nat Struct Mol Biol. (2011) 18:571–6. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2044
122. Dehlink E, Platzer B, Baker AH, LaRosa J, Pardo M, Dwyer P, et al. A soluble form of the high affinity igE receptor, fc-epsilon-RI, circulates in human serum. PloS One. (2011) 6:e19098. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019098
123. Weskamp G, Ford JW, Sturgill J, Martin S, Docherty AJP, Swendeman S, et al. ADAM10 is a principal “sheddase” of the low-affinity immunoglobulin E receptor CD23. Nat Immunol. (2006) 7:1293–8. doi: 10.1038/ni1399
124. Engeroff P, Caviezel F, Mueller D, Thoms F, Bachmann MF, and Vogel M. CD23 provides a noninflammatory pathway for IgE-allergen complexes. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2020) 145:301–11. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2019.07.045
125. Engeroff P, Fellmann M, Yerly D, Bachmann MF, and Vogel M. A novel recycling mechanism of native IgE-antigen complexes in human B cells facilitates transfer of antigen to dendritic cells for antigen presentation. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2018) 142:557–68. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2017.09.024
126. Fellmann M, Buschor P, Röthlisberger S, Zellweger F, and Vogel M. High affinity targeting of CD23 inhibits IgE synthesis in human B cells. Immun Inflammation Dis. (2015) 3:339–49. doi: 10.1002/iid3.72
127. Yu P, Kosco-Vilbois M, Richards M, Köhler G, and Lamers MC. Negative feedback regulation of IgE synthesis by murine CD23. Nature. (1994) 369:753–6. doi: 10.1038/369753a0
128. Getahun A, Hjelm F, and Heyman B. IgE enhances antibody and T cell responses in vivo via CD23+ B cells. J Immunol. (2005) 175:1473–82. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.175.3.1473
129. Hjelm F, Karlsson MCI, and Heyman B. A novel B cell-mediated transport of igE-immune complexes to the follicle of the spleen. J Immunol. (2008) 180:6604–10. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.180.10.6604
130. Plattner K, Gharailoo Z, Zinkhan S, Engeroff P, Bachmann MF, and Vogel M. IgE glycans promote anti-IgE IgG autoantibodies that facilitate IgE serum clearance via Fc Receptors. Front Immunol. (2022) 13:1069100. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1069100
131. Engeroff P, Plattner K, Storni F, Thoms F, Frias Boligan K, Muerner L, et al. Glycan-specific IgG anti-IgE autoantibodies are protective against allergic anaphylaxis in a murine model. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2021) 147:1430–41. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.11.031
132. Plattner K, Augusto G, Muerner L, Von Gunten S, Jörg L, Engeroff P, et al. IgE glycosylation is essential for the function of omalizumab. Allergy. (2023) 78:2546–9. doi: 10.1111/all.15748
133. Cooper AM, Hobson PS, Jutton MR, Kao MW, Drung B, Schmidt B, et al. Soluble CD23 controls IgE synthesis and homeostasis in human B cells. J Immunol Baltim Md. (1950) 188:3199–207.
134. Jégouzo SAF, Feinberg H, Morrison AG, Holder A, May A, Huang Z, et al. CD23 is a glycan-binding receptor in some mammalian species. J Biol Chem. (2019) 294:14845–59. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA119.010572
135. Shade KTC, Platzer B, Washburn N, Mani V, Bartsch YC, Conroy M, et al. A single glycan on IgE is indispensable for initiation of anaphylaxis. J Exp Med. (2015) 212:457–67. doi: 10.1084/jem.20142182
136. Plomp R, Hensbergen PJ, Rombouts Y, Zauner G, Dragan I, Koeleman CAM, et al. Site-specific N-glycosylation analysis of human immunoglobulin E. J Proteome Res. (2014) 13:536–46. doi: 10.1021/pr400714w
137. Wu G, Hitchen PG, Panico M, North SJ, Barbouche MR, Binet D, et al. Glycoproteomic studies of IgE from a novel hyper IgE syndrome linked to PGM3 mutation. Glycoconj J. (2016) 33:447–56. doi: 10.1007/s10719-015-9638-y
138. Sayers I, Cain SA, Swan JRM, Pickett MA, Watt PJ, Holgate ST, et al. Amino acid residues that influence fcϵRI-mediated effector functions of human immunoglobulin E. Biochemistry. (1998) 37:16152–64. doi: 10.1021/bi981456k
139. Sondermann P, Huber R, Oosthuizen V, and Jacob U. The 3.2-Å crystal structure of the human IgG1 Fc fragment–FcγRIII complex. Nature. (2000) 406:267–73. doi: 10.1038/35018508
140. Stadlmann J, Pabst M, Kolarich D, Kunert R, and Altmann F. Analysis of immunoglobulin glycosylation by LC-ESI-MS of glycopeptides and oligosaccharides. PROTEOMICS. (2008) 8:2858–71. doi: 10.1002/pmic.200700968
141. Wuhrer M, Stam JC, van de Geijn FE, Koeleman CAM, Verrips CT, Dolhain RJEM, et al. Glycosylation profiling of immunoglobulin G (IgG) subclasses from human serum. PROTEOMICS. (2007) 7:4070–81. doi: 10.1002/pmic.200700289
142. Gornik O and Lauc G. Glycosylation of serum proteins in inflammatory diseases. Dis Markers. (2008) 25:267–78. doi: 10.1155/2008/493289
143. Lund J, Takahashi N, Pound JD, Goodall M, and Jefferis R. Multiple interactions of IgG with its core oligosaccharide can modulate recognition by complement and human Fc gamma receptor I and influence the synthesis of its oligosaccharide chains. J Immunol Baltim Md. (1950) 157:4963–9.
144. Lux A and Nimmerjahn F. Impact of differential glycosylation on IgG activity. Adv Exp Med Biol. (2011) 780:113–24.
145. Björklund JEM, Karlsson T, and Magnusson CGM. N-glycosylation influences epitope expression and receptor binding structures in human IgE. Mol Immunol. (1999) 36:213–21. doi: 10.1016/S0161-5890(99)00036-X
146. Woof JM and Burton DR. Human antibody–Fc receptor interactions illuminated by crystal structures. Nat Rev Immunol. (2004) 4:89–99. doi: 10.1038/nri1266
147. Basu M, Hakimi J, Dharm E, Kondas JA, Tsien WH, Pilson RS, et al. Purification and characterization of human recombinant IgE-Fc fragments that bind to the human high affinity IgE receptor. J Biol Chem. (1993) 268:13118–27. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)38627-2
148. Vercelli D, Helm B, Marsh P, Padlan E, Geha RS, and Gouid H. The B-cell binding site on human immunoglobulin E. Nature. (1989) 338:649–51. doi: 10.1038/338649a0
149. Jabs F, Plum M, Laursen NS, Jensen RK, Mølgaard B, Miehe M, et al. Trapping IgE in a closed conformation by mimicking CD23 binding prevents and disrupts FcϵRI interaction. Nat Commun. (2018) 9:7. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-02312-7
150. Shade KTC, Conroy ME, Washburn N, Kitaoka M, Huynh DJ, Laprise E, et al. Sialylation of immunoglobulin E is a determinant of allergic pathogenicity. Nature. (2020) 582:265–70. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2311-z
151. del Val IJ, Kontoravdi C, and Nagy JM. Towards the implementation of quality by design to the production of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies with desired glycosylation patterns. Biotechnol Prog. (2010) 26:1505–27. doi: 10.1002/btpr.470
152. Kaneko Y, Nimmerjahn F, and Ravetch JV. Anti-inflammatory activity of immunoglobulin G resulting from fc sialylation. Science. (2006) 313:670–3. doi: 10.1126/science.1129594
153. Vattepu R, Sneed SL, and Anthony RM. Sialylation as an important regulator of antibody function. Front Immunol. (2022) 13:818736. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.818736
154. Anthony RM, Kobayashi T, Wermeling F, and Ravetch JV. Intravenous gammaglobulin suppresses inflammation through a novel TH2 pathway. Nature. (2011) 475:110–3. doi: 10.1038/nature10134
155. Samuelsson A, Towers TL, and Ravetch JV. Anti-inflammatory activity of IVIG mediated through the inhibitory fc receptor. Science. (2001) 291:484–6. doi: 10.1126/science.291.5503.484
156. Nimmerjahn F and Ravetch JV. Anti-inflammatory actions of intravenous immunoglobulin. Annu Rev Immunol. (2008) 26:513–33. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.26.021607.090232
157. Negi VS, Elluru S, Sibéril S, Graff-Dubois S, Mouthon L, Kazatchkine MD, et al. Intravenous immunoglobulin: an update on the clinical use and mechanisms of action. J Clin Immunol. (2007) 27:233–45. doi: 10.1007/s10875-007-9088-9
158. Kleinau S. The impact of fc receptors on the development of autoimmune diseases. Curr Pharm Des. (2003) 9:1861–70. doi: 10.2174/1381612033454414
159. Ravetch JV. Fc receptors. In: Paul WE, editor. Fundamental immunology. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, PA (2003). p. 685–700.
160. Gyorgypal A, Banerjee S, Conroy ME, and Anthony RM. Glycobiology of igE. Immunol Rev. (2025) 331:e70032. doi: 10.1111/imr.70032
161. McCraw AJ, Gardner RA, Davies AM, Spencer DIR, Grandits M, Wagner GK, et al. Generation and characterization of native and sialic acid-deficient igE. Int J Mol Sci. (2022) 23:13455. doi: 10.3390/ijms232113455
162. Duan S, Arlian BM, Nycholat CM, Wei Y, Tateno H, Smith SA, et al. Nanoparticles displaying allergen and siglec-8 ligands suppress igE-fcϵRI–mediated anaphylaxis and desensitize mast cells to subsequent antigen challenge. J Immunol. (2021) 206:2290–300. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1901212
163. Galli SJ. Recruiting CD33 on mast cells to inhibit IgE-mediated mast cell–dependent anaphylaxis. J Clin Invest. (2019) 129:955–7. doi: 10.1172/JCI127100
164. Barshow SM, Islam M, Commins S, Macauley MS, Paulson JC, and Kulis MD. Targeting inhibitory Siglec-3 to suppress IgE-mediated human basophil degranulation. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2024) 154:492–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2024.03.020
165. Niki T, Tsutsui S, Hirose S, Aradono S, Sugimoto Y, Takeshita K, et al. Galectin-9 is a high affinity igE-binding lectin with anti-allergic effect by blocking igE-antigen complex formation. J Biol Chem. (2009) 284:32344–52. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.035196
166. Frigeri LG, Zuberi RI, and FT.epsilon.BP L. a.beta.-galactoside-binding animal lectin, recognizes IgE receptor (Fc.epsilon.RI) and activates mast cells. Biochemistry. (1993) 32:7644–9. doi: 10.1021/bi00081a007
167. Gao P, Gibson PG, Baines KJ, Yang IA, Upham JW, Reynolds PN, et al. Anti-inflammatory deficiencies in neutrophilic asthma: reduced galectin-3 and IL-1RA/IL-1β. Respir Res. (2015) 16:5. doi: 10.1186/s12931-014-0163-5
168. Riccio AM, Mauri P, De Ferrari L, Rossi R, Di Silvestre D, Benazzi L, et al. Galectin-3: an early predictive biomarker of modulation of airway remodeling in patients with severe asthma treated with omalizumab for 36 months. Clin Transl Allergy. (2017) 7:6. doi: 10.1186/s13601-017-0143-1
169. World Health Organization. TDR Disease Reference Group on Helminth Infections. Research priorities for helminth infections. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. (2012), 1–174.
170. Bethony J, Brooker S, Albonico M, Geiger SM, Loukas A, Diemert D, et al. Soil-transmitted helminth infections: ascariasis, trichuriasis, and hookworm. Lancet. (2006) 367:1521–32. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68653-4
172. Yasuda K and Kuroda E. Role of eosinophils in protective immunity against secondary nematode infections. Immunol Med. (2019) 42:148–55. doi: 10.1080/25785826.2019.1697135
173. Stothard JR, Campbell SJ, Osei-Atweneboana MY, Durant T, Stanton MC, Biritwum NK, et al. Towards interruption of schistosomiasis transmission in sub-Saharan Africa: developing an appropriate environmental surveillance framework to guide and to support ‘end game’ interventions. Infect Dis Povert. (2017) 6:10. doi: 10.1186/s40249-016-0215-9
174. Steinbaum L, Njenga SM, Kihara J, Boehm AB, Davis J, Null C, et al. Soil-Transmitted Helminth Eggs Are Present in Soil at Multiple Locations within Households in Rural Kenya. PloS One. (2016) 11:e0157780. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157780
175. Canonica GW. History of the world allergy organization: innovation in continuity 2008-2009. World Allergy Organ J. (2011) 4:188–92. doi: 10.1097/WOX.0b013e318238f58f
176. Burke W, Fesinmeyer M, Reed K, Hampson L, and Carlsten C. Family history as a predictor of asthma risk. Am J Prev Med. (2003) 24:160–9. doi: 10.1016/S0749-3797(02)00589-5
177. von Mutius E. Environmental factors influencing the development and progression of pediatric asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2002) 109:S525–32. doi: 10.1067/mai.2002.124565
178. Addo-Yobo EOD, Woodcock A, Allotey A, Baffoe-Bonnie B, Strachan D, and Custovic A. Exercise-induced bronchospasm and atopy in Ghana: two surveys ten years apart. Barnes PJ editor. PloS Med. (2007) 4:e70. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040070
179. Yemaneberhan H, Flohr C, Lewis SA, Bekele Z, Parry E, Williams HC, et al. Prevalence and associated factors of atopic dermatitis symptoms in rural and urban Ethiopia. Clin Htmlent Glyphamp Asciiamp Exp Allergy. (2004) 34:779–85. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2004.1946.x
180. Yazdanbakhsh M, Kremsner PG, and van Ree R. Allergy, parasites, and the hygiene hypothesis. Science. (2002) 296:490–4. doi: 10.1126/science.296.5567.490
181. Reynolds LA and Finlay BB. Early life factors that affect allergy development. Nat Rev Immunol. (2017) 17:518–28. doi: 10.1038/nri.2017.39
182. Wilson MS and Maizels RM. Regulation of allergy and autoimmunity in helminth infection. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. (2004) 26:35–50. doi: 10.1385/CRIAI:26:1:35
183. Strachan DP. Hay fever, hygiene, and household size. BMJ. (1989) 299:1259–60. doi: 10.1136/bmj.299.6710.1259
184. Fallon PG and Mangan NE. Suppression of TH2-type allergic reactions by helminth infection. Nat Rev Immunol. (2007) 7:220–30. doi: 10.1038/nri2039
185. Holt PG. Parasites, atopy, and the hygiene hypothesis: resolution of a paradox? Lancet. (2000) 356:1699–701. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)03198-6
186. Yazdanbakhsh M and Matricardi PM. Parasites and the hygiene hypothesis: regulating the immune system? Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. (2004) 26:15–24.
187. Voehringer D. Protective and pathological roles of mast cells and basophils. Nat Rev Immunol. (2013) 13:362–75. doi: 10.1038/nri3427
188. Stone KD, Prussin C, and Metcalfe DD. IgE, mast cells, basophils, and eosinophils. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2010) 125:S73–80. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.11.017
189. Anthony RM, Rutitzky LI, Urban JF, Stadecker MJ, and Gause WC. Protective immune mechanisms in helminth infection. Nat Rev Immunol. (2007) 7:975–87. doi: 10.1038/nri2199
190. Owyang AM, Zaph C, Wilson EH, Guild KJ, McClanahan T, Miller HRP, et al. Interleukin 25 regulates type 2 cytokine-dependent immunity and limits chronic inflammation in the gastrointestinal tract. J Exp Med. (2006) 203:843–9. doi: 10.1084/jem.20051496
191. Fallon PG, Ballantyne SJ, Mangan NE, Barlow JL, Dasvarma A, Hewett DR, et al. Identification of an interleukin (IL)-25–dependent cell population that provides IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 at the onset of helminth expulsion. J Exp Med. (2006) 203:1105–16. doi: 10.1084/jem.20051615
192. Jankovic D, Kullberg MC, Feng CG, Goldszmid RS, Collazo CM, Wilson M, et al. Conventional T-bet+Foxp3– Th1 cells are the major source of host-protective regulatory IL-10 during intracellular protozoan infection. J Exp Med. (2007) 204:273–83. doi: 10.1084/jem.20062175
193. Anderson CF, Oukka M, Kuchroo VJ, and Sacks D. CD4+CD25–Foxp3– Th1 cells are the source of IL-10–mediated immune suppression in chronic cutaneous leishmaniasis. J Exp Med. (2007) 204:285–97. doi: 10.1084/jem.20061886
194. Hoffmann KF, Cheever AW, and Wynn TA. IL-10 and the dangers of immune polarization: excessive type 1 and type 2 cytokine responses induce distinct forms of lethal immunopathology in murine schistosomiasis. J Immunol. (2000) 164:6406–16. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.164.12.6406
195. Kinet JP. THE HIGH-AFFINITY I g E RECEPTOR (FcϵRI): from physiology to pathology. Annu Rev Immunol. (1999) 17:931–72. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.17.1.931
196. Colas L, Magnan A, and Brouard S. Immunoglobulin E response in health and disease beyond allergic disorders. Allergy. (2022) 77:1700–18. doi: 10.1111/all.15230
197. Aalberse RC, Stapel SO, Schuurman J, and Rispens T. Immunoglobulin G4: an odd antibody. Clin Exp Allergy. (2009) 39:469–77. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2009.03207.x
198. Fitzsimmons CM, Falcone FH, and Dunne DW. Helminth allergens, parasite-specific igE, and its protective role in human immunity. Front Immunol. (2014) 5:61. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00061
199. Yazdanbakhsh M, van den Biggelaar A, and Maizels RM. Th2 responses without atopy: immunoregulation in chronic helminth infections and reduced allergic disease. Trends Immunol. (2001) 22:372–7. doi: 10.1016/S1471-4906(01)01958-5
200. Galli SJ and Tsai M. IgE and mast cells in allergic disease. Nat Med. (2012) 18:693–704. doi: 10.1038/nm.2755
201. Pulendran B and Artis D. New paradigms in type 2 immunity. Science. (2012) 337:431–5. doi: 10.1126/science.1221064
202. Finkelman FD, Shea-Donohue T, Morris SC, Gildea L, Strait R, Madden KB, et al. Interleukin-4- and interleukin-13-mediated host protection against intestinal nematode parasites. Immunol Rev. (2004) 201:139–55. doi: 10.1111/j.0105-2896.2004.00192.x
203. Stetson DB, Voehringer D, Grogan JL, Xu M, Reinhardt RL, Scheu S, et al. Th2 cells: orchestrating barrier immunity. Adv Immunol. (2004) 83:163–89.
204. Fitzsimmons CM and Dunne DW. Survival of the fittest: allergology or parasitology? Trends Parasitol. (2009) 25:447–51.
205. Hagan P, Blumenthal UJ, Dunn D, Simpson AJG, and Wilkins HA. Human IgE, IgG4 and resistance to reinfection with Schistosoma haematobium. Nature. (1991) 349:243–5. doi: 10.1038/349243a0
206. Rihet P, Demeure CE, Bourgois A, Prata A, and Dessein AJ. Evidence for an association between human resistance toSchistosoma mansoni and high anti-larval IgE levels. Eur J Immunol. (1991) 21:2679–86. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830211106
207. Faulkner H, Turner J, Kamgno J, Pion SD, Boussinesq M, and Bradley JE. Age- and infection intensity–dependent cytokine and antibody production in human trichuriasis: the importance of igE. J Infect Dis. (2002) 185:665–72. doi: 10.1086/339005
208. Verwaerde C, Joseph M, Capron M, Pierce RJ, Damonneville M, Velge F, et al. Functional properties of a rat monoclonal IgE antibody specific for Schistosoma mansoni. J Immunol Baltim Md. (1950) 138:4441–6.
209. Dunne DW, Butterworth AE, Fulford AJC, Ouma JH, and Sturrock RF. Human IgE responses to Schistosoma mansoni and resistance to reinfection. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. (1992) 87:99–103. doi: 10.1590/S0074-02761992000800014
210. Nkurunungi G, Van Diepen A, Nassuuna J, Sanya RE, Nampijja M, Nambuya I, et al. Microarray assessment of N-glycan-specific IgE and IgG profiles associated with Schistosoma mansoni infection in rural and urban Uganda. Sci Rep. (2019) 9:3522. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-40009-7
211. Adjobimey T and Hoerauf A. Distinct N-linked immunoglobulin G glycosylation patterns are associated with chronic pathology and asymptomatic infections in human lymphatic filariasis. Front Immunol. (2022) 13:790895. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.790895
212. Hadadianpour A, Daniel J, Zhang J, Spiller BW, Makaraviciute A, DeWitt ÅM, et al. Human IgE mAbs identify major antigens of parasitic worm infection. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2022) 150:1525–33. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2022.05.022
213. Dombrowicz D. Identification of major human IgE-inducing parasite antigens: A path to therapeutic approaches? J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2022) 150:1412–4.
214. Gause W. The immune response to parasitic helminths: insights from murine models. Trends Immunol. (2003) 24:269–77. doi: 10.1016/S1471-4906(03)00101-7
215. Stadecker MJ, Asahi H, Finger E, Hernandez HJ, Rutitzky LI, and Sun J. The immunobiology of Th1 polarization in high-pathology schistosomiasis. Immunol Rev. (2004) 201:168–79. doi: 10.1111/j.0105-2896.2004.00197.x
216. Cooper PJ. Interactions between helminth parasites and allergy. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. (2009) 9:29–37. doi: 10.1097/ACI.0b013e32831f44a6
217. Leonardi-Bee J, Pritchard D, Britton J, and the Parasites in Asthma Collaboration. Asthma and current intestinal parasite infection: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. (2006) 174:514–23. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200603-331OC
218. Alcasid ML, Chiaramonte LT, Kim HJ, Zohn B, Bongiorno JR, and Mullin W. Bronchial asthma and intestinal parasites. N Y State J Med. (1973) 73:1786–8.
219. Turton J. IgE, PARASITES, AND ALLERGY. Lancet. (1976) 308:686. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(76)92492-2
220. Turner KJ, Quinn EH, and Anderson HR. Regulation of asthma by intestinal parasites. Invest possible mechanisms. Immunol. (1978) 35:281–8.
221. Tullis DCH. Bronchial asthma associated with intestinal parasites. N Engl J Med. (1970) 282:370–2. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197002122820706
223. Feary J, Britton J, and Leonardi-Bee J. Atopy and current intestinal parasite infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis: Atopy and current intestinal parasite infection. Allergy. (2011) 66:569–78. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2010.02512.x
224. Lynch NR, Hagel IA, Palenque ME, Di Prisco MC, Escudero JE, Corao LA, et al. Relationship between helminthic infection and IgE response in atopic and nonatopic children in a tropical environment. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (1998) 101:217–21. doi: 10.1016/S0091-6749(98)70386-0
225. Mitre E, Norwood S, and Nutman TB. Saturation of immunoglobulin E (IgE) binding sites by polyclonal igE does not explain the protective effect of helminth infections against atopy. Infect Immun. (2005) 73:4106–11. doi: 10.1128/IAI.73.7.4106-4111.2005
226. MacGlashan DW, Bochner BS, Adelman DC, Jardieu PM, Togias A, McKenzie-White J, et al. Down-regulation of Fc(epsilon)RI expression on human basophils during in vivo treatment of atopic patients with anti-IgE antibody. J Immunol Baltim Md. (1950) 158:1438–45.
227. Amoah AS, Obeng BB, Larbi IA, Versteeg SA, Aryeetey Y, Akkerdaas JH, et al. Peanut-specific IgE antibodies in asymptomatic Ghanaian children possibly caused by carbohydrate determinant cross-reactivity. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2013) 132:639–47. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2013.04.023
228. Larson D, Cooper PJ, Hübner MP, Reyes J, Vaca M, Chico M, et al. Helminth infection is associated with decreased basophil responsiveness in human beings. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2012) 130:270–2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2012.04.017
229. Hussain R, Poindexter RW, and Ottesen EA. Control of allergic reactivity in human filariasis. Predominant localization of blocking antibody to the IgG4 subclass. J Immunol Baltim Md. (1950) 148:2731–7.
230. Kepley CL, Cambier JC, Morel PA, Lujan D, Ortega E, Wilson BS, et al. Negative regulation of FcϵRI signaling by FcγRII costimulation in human blood basophils. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2000) 106:337–48. doi: 10.1067/mai.2000.107931
231. Mertsching E, Bafetti L, Hess H, Perper S, Giza K, Allen LC, et al. A mouse Fcγ-Fcϵ protein that inhibits mast cells through activation of FcγRIIB, SH2 domain–containing inositol phosphatase 1, and SH2 domain–containing protein tyrosine phosphatases. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2008) 121:441–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2007.08.051
232. Larson D, Hübner MP, Torrero MN, Morris CP, Brankin A, Swierczewski BE, et al. Chronic helminth infection reduces basophil responsiveness in an IL-10–dependent manner. J Immunol. (2012) 188:4188–99. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1101859
233. Hartmann W, Haben I, Fleischer B, and Breloer M. Pathogenic nematodes suppress humoral responses to third-party antigens in vivo by IL-10–mediated interference with th cell function. J Immunol. (2011) 187:4088–99. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1004136
234. Malisan F, Brière F, Bridon JM, Harindranath N, Mills FC, Max EE, et al. Interleukin-10 induces immunoglobulin G isotype switch recombination in human CD40-activated naive B lymphocytes. J Exp Med. (1996) 183:937–47. doi: 10.1084/jem.183.3.937
235. Jeannin P, Lecoanet S, Delneste Y, Gauchat JF, and Bonnefoy JY. IgE versus IgG4 production can be differentially regulated by IL-10. J Immunol Baltim Md. (1950) 160:3555–61.
236. Akdis CA and Blaser K. IL-10-induced anergy in peripheral T cell and reactivation by microenvironmental cytokines: two key steps in specific immunotherapy. FASEB J. (1999) 13:603–9. doi: 10.1096/fasebj.13.6.603
237. van de Veen W, Stanic B, Yaman G, Wawrzyniak M, Söllner S, Akdis DG, et al. IgG4 production is confined to human IL-10–producing regulatory B cells that suppress antigen-specific immune responses. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2013) 131:1204–12. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2013.01.014
238. Satoguina JS, Adjobimey T, Arndts K, Hoch J, Oldenburg J, Layland LE, et al. Tr1 and naturally occurring regulatory T cells induce IgG4 in B cells through GITR/GITR-L interaction, IL-10 and TGF-β. Eur J Immunol. (2008) 38:3101–13. doi: 10.1002/eji.200838193
239. Wilson MS, Taylor MD, Balic A, Finney CAM, Lamb JR, and Maizels RM. Suppression of allergic airway inflammation by helminth-induced regulatory T cells. J Exp Med. (2005) 202:1199–212. doi: 10.1084/jem.20042572
240. Prakash PS, Weber MHW, van Hellemond JJ, and Falcone FH. Are humanized IgE reporter systems potential game changers in serological diagnosis of human parasitic infection? Parasitol Res. (2022) 121:1137–44.
241. Kaew-Amdee S, Makornwattana M, and Charlermroj R. Identification of novel human IgE-binding peptides from a phage display library for total IgE detection. Sci Rep. (2025) 15:27986. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-12574-7
242. Pera V, Brusselle GG, Riemann S, Kors JA, Van Mulligen EM, Parry R, et al. Parasitic infections related to anti-type 2 immunity monoclonal antibodies: a disproportionality analysis in the food and drug administration’s adverse event reporting system (FAERS). Front Pharmacol. (2023) 14:1276340. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1276340
243. Vogel M and Engeroff P. A comparison of natural and therapeutic anti-igE antibodies. Antibodies Basel Switz. (2024) 13:58. doi: 10.3390/antib13030058
244. Fernandez Lahore G, Förster M, Johannesson M, Sabatier P, Lönnblom E, Aoun M, et al. Polymorphic estrogen receptor binding site causes Cd2-dependent sex bias in the susceptibility to autoimmune diseases. Nat Commun. (2021) 12:5565. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-25828-5
245. Theofilopoulos AN, Kono DH, and Baccala R. The multiple pathways to autoimmunity. Nat Immunol. (2017) 18:716–24. doi: 10.1038/ni.3731
246. Billi AC, Kahlenberg JM, and Gudjonsson JE. Sex bias in autoimmunity. Curr Opin Rheumatol. (2019) 31:53–61. doi: 10.1097/BOR.0000000000000564
247. Klein SL and Flanagan KL. Sex differences in immune responses. Nat Rev Immunol. (2016) 16:626–38. doi: 10.1038/nri.2016.90
248. Wang L, Wang FS, Chang C, and Gershwin M. Breach of tolerance: primary biliary cirrhosis. Semin Liver Dis. (2014) 34:297–317. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1383729
249. Palomares O, Akdis M, Martín-Fontecha M, and Akdis CA. Mechanisms of immune regulation in allergic diseases: the role of regulatory T and B cells. Immunol Rev. (2017) 278:219–36. doi: 10.1111/imr.12555
250. Jansen K, Cevhertas L, Ma S, Satitsuksanoa P, Akdis M, and van de Veen W. Regulatory B cells, A to Z. Allergy. (2021) 76:2699–715. doi: 10.1111/all.14763
251. Bach JF. The effect of infections on susceptibility to autoimmune and allergic diseases. N Engl J Med. (2002) 347:911–20. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra020100
252. Palomares O, Yaman G, Azkur AK, Akkoc T, Akdis M, and Akdis CA. Role of Treg in immune regulation of allergic diseases. Eur J Immunol. (2010) 40:1232–40. doi: 10.1002/eji.200940045
253. Sanjuan MA, Sagar D, and Kolbeck R. Role of igE in autoimmunity. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2016) 137:1651–61. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2016.04.007
254. Johnson E, Irons J, Patterson R, and Roberts M. Serum IgE concentration in atopic dermatitis *1Relationship to severity of disease and presence of atopic respiratory disease. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (1974) 54:94–9. doi: 10.1016/0091-6749(74)90037-2
255. Atta AM, Sousa CP, Carvalho EM, and Sousa-Atta MLB. Immunoglobulin E and systemic lupus erythematosus. Braz J Med Biol Res Rev Bras Pesqui Medicas E Biol. (2004) 37:1497–501. doi: 10.1590/S0100-879X2004001000008
256. Budde IK, De Heer PG, Natter S, Mahler V, van der Zee JS, Valenta R, et al. Studies on the association between immunoglobulin E autoreactivity and immunoglobulin E-dependent histamine-releasing factors: IgE autoreactivity and HRF. Immunology. (2002) 107:243–51. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2567.2002.01475.x
257. Dema B, Charles N, Pellefigues C, Ricks TK, Suzuki R, Jiang C, et al. Immunoglobulin E plays an immunoregulatory role in lupus. J Exp Med. (2014) 211:2159–68. doi: 10.1084/jem.20140066
258. Palomares O, Elewaut D, Irving PM, Jaumont X, and Tassinari P. Regulatory T cells and immunoglobulin E: A new therapeutic link for autoimmunity? Allergy. (2022) 77:3293–308. doi: 10.1111/all.15449
259. Poto R, Loffredo S, Marone G, Di Salvatore A, de Paulis A, Schroeder JT, et al. Basophils beyond allergic and parasitic diseases. Front Immunol. (2023) 14:1190034. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1190034
260. Marcolongo R and Marsili C. Determination of serum IgD and IgE levels in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Reumatismo. (1972) 24:173–4.
261. Hunder GG, Gleich GJ, and Immunoglobulin E. (IgE) levels in serum and synovial fluid in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. (1974) 17:955–63. doi: 10.1002/art.1780170606
262. Arbesman CE, Wypych JI, Reisman RE, and Beutner EH. IgE levels in sera of patients with pemphigus or bullous pemphigoid. Arch Dermatol. (1974) 110:378–81. doi: 10.1001/archderm.1974.01630090016003
263. Ogawa M, Berger PA, McIntyre OR, Clendenning WE, and Ishizaka K. IgE in atopic dermatitis. Arch Dermatol. (1971) 103:575–80. doi: 10.1001/archderm.1971.04000180001001
264. Igarashi R. An immunohistochemical study of IgE in the skin of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (author’s transl). Nihon Hifuka Gakkai Zasshi Jpn J Dermatol. (1975) 85:385–93.
265. Muiño JC, Juárez CP, Luna JD, Castro CC, Wolff EG, Ferrero M, et al. The importance of specific IgG and IgE autoantibodies to retinal S antigen, total serum IgE, and sCD23 levels in autoimmune and infectious uveitis. J Clin Immunol. (1999) 19:215–22. doi: 10.1023/A:1020516029883
266. Kaufman LD, Gruber BL, Marchese MJ, and Seibold JR. Anti-IgE autoantibodies in systemic sclerosis (scleroderma). Ann Rheum Dis. (1989) 48:201–5. doi: 10.1136/ard.48.3.201
267. Mikol DD, Ditlow C, Usatin D, Biswas P, Kalbfleisch J, Milner A, et al. Serum IgE reactive against small myelin protein-derived peptides is increased in multiple sclerosis patients. J Neuroimmunol. (2006) 180:40–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2006.06.030
268. Guo J, Rapoport B, and McLachlan SM. Thyroid peroxidase autoantibodies of igE class in thyroid autoimmunity. Clin Immunol Immunopathol. (1997) 82:157–62. doi: 10.1006/clin.1996.4297
269. Sato A, Takemura Y, Yamada T, Ohtsuka H, Sakai H, Miyahara Y, et al. A possible role of immunoglobulin E in patients with hyperthyroid graves’ Disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. (1999) 84:3602–5.
270. Altrichter S, Peter HJ, Pisarevskaja D, Metz M, Martus P, and Maurer M. IgE mediated autoallergy against thyroid peroxidase – A novel pathomechanism of chronic spontaneous urticaria? PloS One. (2011) 6:e14794.
271. Metz M, Ohanyan T, Church MK, and Maurer M. Omalizumab is an effective and rapidly acting therapy in difficult-to-treat chronic urticaria: A retrospective clinical analysis. J Dermatol Sci. (2014) 73:57–62. doi: 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2013.08.011
272. Kiriakidou M and Ching CL. Systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann Intern Med. (2020) 172:ITC81–96. doi: 10.7326/AITC202006020
273. Tsokos GC. Systemic lupus erythematosus. N Engl J Med. (2011) 365:2110–21. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1100359
274. Laurent J, Lagrue G, and Sobel A. Increased serum igE levels in patients with lupus nephritis. Am J Nephrol. (1986) 6:413–4. doi: 10.1159/000167202
275. Liphaus BL, Jesus AA, Silva CA, Coutinho A, and Carneiro-Sampaio M. Increased IgE serum levels are unrelated to allergic and parasitic diseases in patients with juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus. Clinics. (2012) 67:1275–80. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2012(11)09
276. Rebhun J, Quismorio F, Dubois E, and Heiner DC. Systemic lupus erythematosus activity and IgE. Ann Allergy. (1983) 50:34–6.
277. Henault J, Riggs JM, Karnell JL, Liarski VM, Li J, Shirinian L, et al. Self-reactive IgE exacerbates interferon responses associated with autoimmunity. Nat Immunol. (2016) 17:196–203. doi: 10.1038/ni.3326
278. Aldebert D, Lamkhioued B, Desaint C, Gounni AS, Goldman M, Capron A, et al. Eosinophils express a functional receptor for interferon alpha: inhibitory role of interferon alpha on the release of mediators. Blood. (1996) 87:2354–60. doi: 10.1182/blood.V87.6.2354.bloodjournal8762354
279. Swieter M, Ghali WA, Rimmer C, and Befus D. Interferon-alpha/beta inhibits IgE-dependent histamine release from rat mast cells. Immunology. (1989) 66:606–10.
280. Parks C, Biagini R, Cooper G, Gilkeson G, and Dooley M. Total serum IgE levels in systemic lupus erythematosus and associations with childhood onset allergies. Lupus. (2010) 19:1614–22. doi: 10.1177/0961203310379870
281. Morton S, Palmer B, Muir K, and Powell RJ. IgE and non-IgE mediated allergic disorders in systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann Rheum Dis. (1998) 57:660–3. doi: 10.1136/ard.57.11.660
282. Zhu H, Luo H, Yan M, Zuo X, and Li QZ. Autoantigen microarray for high-throughput autoantibody profiling in systemic lupus erythematosus. Genomics Proteomics Bioinf. (2015) 13:210–8. doi: 10.1016/j.gpb.2015.09.001
283. Seshan SV and Jennette JC. Renal disease in systemic lupus erythematosus with emphasis on classification of lupus glomerulonephritis: advances and implications. Arch Pathol Lab Med. (2009) 133:233–48. doi: 10.5858/133.2.233
284. Dema B, Pellefigues C, Hasni S, Gault N, Jiang C, Ricks TK, et al. Autoreactive igE is prevalent in systemic lupus erythematosus and is associated with increased disease activity and nephritis. Bobé P editor. PloS One. (2014) 9:e90424. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090424
285. Pan Q, Gong L, Xiao H, Feng Y, Li L, Deng Z, et al. Basophil activation-dependent autoantibody and interleukin-17 production exacerbate systemic lupus erythematosus. Front Immunol. (2017) 8:348. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00348
286. Kramer K, Pecher AC, Henes J, and Klein R. IgE autoantibodies to nuclear antigens in patients with different connective tissue diseases: re-evaluation and novel findings. Front Immunol. (2025) 16:1483815. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1483815
287. Tian J, Zhou H, Li W, Yao X, and Lu Q. New mechanisms and therapeutic targets in systemic lupus erythematosus. MedComm. (2025) 6:e70246. doi: 10.1002/mco2.70246
288. Kolkhir P, Pogorelov D, Olisova O, and Maurer M. Comorbidity and pathogenic links of chronic spontaneous urticaria and systemic lupus erythematosus - a systematic review. Clin Exp Allergy. (2016) 46:275–87. doi: 10.1111/cea.12673
289. Konstantinou GN, Asero R, Maurer M, Sabroe RA, Schmid-Grendelmeier P, and Grattan CEH. EAACI/GA 2 LEN task force consensus report: the autologous serum skin test in urticaria. Allergy. (2009) 64:1256–68. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2009.02132.x
290. Chang TW, Chen C, Lin CJ, Metz M, Church MK, and Maurer M. The potential pharmacologic mechanisms of omalizumab in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2015) 135:337–42. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2014.04.036
291. Altrichter S, Kriehuber E, Moser J, Valenta R, Kopp T, and Stingl G. Serum igE autoantibodies target keratinocytes in patients with atopic dermatitis. J Invest Dermatol. (2008) 128:2232–9. doi: 10.1038/jid.2008.80
292. Concha LB, Chang CC, Szema AM, Dattwyler RJ, and Carlson HE. IgE antithyroid antibodies in patients with Hashimoto’s disease and chronic urticaria. Allergy Asthma Proc. (2004) 25:293–6.
293. Kashiwakura J, Hayama K, Fujisawa D, Sasaki-Sakamoto T, Terui T, Ra C, et al. Significantly high levels of anti-dsDNA immunoglobulin E in sera and the ability of dsDNA to induce the degranulation of basophils from chronic urticaria patients. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. (2013) 161:154–8. doi: 10.1159/000350388
294. Schmetzer O, Lakin E, Topal FA, Preusse P, Freier D, Church MK, et al. IL-24 is a common and specific autoantigen of IgE in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2018) 142:876–82. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2017.10.035
295. Jang JH, Xiang YK, Yang EM, Kim JH, Choi B, Park HS, et al. Distinct clinical profiles of igE and igG autoantibodies to thyroid peroxidase in chronic spontaneous urticaria. Allergy Asthma Immunol Res. (2024) 16:626–39. doi: 10.4168/aair.2024.16.6.626
296. Moñino-Romero S, Hackler Y, Okas TL, Grekowitz EM, Fluhr JW, Hultsch V, et al. Positive basophil tests are linked to high disease activity and other features of autoimmune chronic spontaneous urticaria: A systematic review. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. (2023) 11:2411–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2023.05.039
297. Maurer M, Altrichter S, Bieber T, Biedermann T, Bräutigam M, Seyfried S, et al. Efficacy and safety of omalizumab in patients with chronic urticaria who exhibit IgE against thyroperoxidase. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2011) 128:202–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2011.04.038
298. Gericke J, Metz M, Ohanyan T, Weller K, Altrichter S, Skov PS, et al. Serum autoreactivity predicts time to response to omalizumab therapy in chronic spontaneous urticaria. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2017) 139:1059–61. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2016.07.047
299. Schmidt E and Zillikens D. Pemphigoid diseases. Lancet. (2013) 381:320–32. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61140-4
300. Miyamoto D, Santi CG, Aoki V, and Maruta CW. Bullous pemphigoid. Bras Dermatol. (2019) 94:133–46. doi: 10.1590/abd1806-4841.20199007
301. Messingham K a. N, Holahan HM, and Fairley JA. Unraveling the significance of IgE autoantibodies in organ-specific autoimmunity: lessons learned from bullous pemphigoid. Immunol Res. (2014) 59:273–8. doi: 10.1007/s12026-014-8547-7
302. Werth VP, Murrell DF, Joly P, Heck R, Orengo JM, Ardeleanu M, et al. Pathophysiology of bullous pemphigoid: role of type 2 inflammation and emerging treatment strategies (Narrative review). Adv Ther. (2024) 41:4418–32. doi: 10.1007/s12325-024-02992-w
303. Emtenani S, Linnemann BE, Recke A, von Georg A, Goletz S, Schmidt E, et al. Anti-BP230 IgE autoantibodies in bullous pemphigoid intraindividually correlate with disease activity. J Dermatol Sci. (2024) 114:64–70. doi: 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2024.03.009
304. Obijiofor CE, Ogah O, Anyanwu N, Akoh CC, Moshiri AS, Culton DA, et al. Insights into bullous pemphigoid: A comprehensive review of diagnostic modalities. JAAD Rev. (2025) 3:26–36. doi: 10.1016/j.jdrv.2024.11.004
305. Giang Pham N, Thi Ha Nguyen V, and Le Huu D. High serum total IgE levels correlate with urticarial lesions and IgE deposition in perilesional skin of bullous pemphigoid patients: An observational study. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. (2025) 91:204–9. doi: 10.25259/IJDVL_610_2023
306. Dvorak AM, Mihm MC, Osage JE, Kwan TH, Austen KF, and Wintroub BU. Bullous pemphigoid, and ultrastructural study of the inflammatory response: eosinophil, basophil and mast cell granule changes in multiple biopsies from one patient. J Invest Dermatol. (1982) 78:91–101. doi: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12505711
307. Wintroub BU, Mihm MC, Goetzl EJ, Soter NA, and Austen KF. Morphologic and functional evidence for release of mast-cell products in bullous pemphigoid. N Engl J Med. (1978) 298:417–21. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197802232980803
308. Dimson OG, Giudice GJ, Fu CL, Van den Bergh F, Warren SJ, Janson MM, et al. Identification of a potential effector function for igE autoantibodies in the organ-specific autoimmune disease bullous pemphigoid. J Invest Dermatol. (2003) 120:784–8. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1747.2003.12146.x
309. Döpp R, Schmidt E, Chimanovitch I, Leverkus M, Bröcker EB, and Zillikens D. IgG4 and IgE are the major immunoglobulins targeting the NC16A domain of BP180 in Bullous pemphigoid: serum levels of these immunoglobulins reflect disease activity. J Am Acad Dermatol. (2000) 42:577–83. doi: 10.1067/mjd.2000.103986
310. Bao L, Guerrero-Juarez CF, Li J, Pigors M, Emtenani S, Liu Y, et al. IgG autoantibodies in bullous pemphigoid induce a pathogenic MyD88-dependent pro-inflammatory response in keratinocytes. Nat Commun. (2025) 16:7254. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-62495-2
311. Mashima E, Saito-Sasaki N, and Sawada Y. Systemic implications of bullous pemphigoid: bridging dermatology and internal medicine. Diagn Basel Switz. (2024) 14:2272. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14202272
312. Engineer L, Bhol K, Kumari S, and Razzaque A. Bullous pemphigoid: interaction of interleukin 5, anti-basement membrane zone antibodies and eosinophils. A preliminary observation. Cytokine. (2001) 13:32–8. doi: 10.1006/cyto.2000.0791
313. Ishiura N, Fujimoto M, Watanabe R, Nakashima H, Kuwano Y, Yazawa N, et al. Serum levels of IgE anti-BP180 and anti-BP230 autoantibodies in patients with bullous pemphigoid. J Dermatol Sci. (2008) 49:153–61. doi: 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2007.08.008
314. Fania L, Caldarola G, Müller R, Brandt O, Pellicano R, Feliciani C, et al. IgE recognition of bullous pemphigoid (BP)180 and BP230 in BP patients and elderly individuals with pruritic dermatoses. Clin Immunol. (2012) 143:236–45. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2012.02.003
315. Engeroff P and Vogel M. IgE in the regulation of adaptive immune responses. Immunol Rev. (2025) 331:e70030. doi: 10.1111/imr.70030
316. Cavallo F, De Giovanni C, Nanni P, Forni G, and Lollini PL. 2011: the immune hallmarks of cancer. Cancer Immunol Immunother. (2011) 60:319–26. doi: 10.1007/s00262-010-0968-0
317. Karagiannis P, Gilbert AE, Josephs DH, Ali N, Dodev T, Saul L, et al. IgG4 subclass antibodies impair antitumor immunity in melanoma. J Clin Invest. (2013) 123:1457–74. doi: 10.1172/JCI65579
318. Andreu P, Johansson M, Affara NI, Pucci F, Tan T, Junankar S, et al. FcRγ Activation regulates inflammation-associated squamous carcinogenesis. Cancer Cell. (2010) 17:121–34. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2009.12.019
319. Neuchrist C, Kornfehl J, Grasl M, Lassmann H, Kraft D, Ehrenberger K, et al. Distribution of immunoglobulins in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. (1994) 104:97–100. doi: 10.1159/000236714
320. Fu SL, Pierre J, Smith-Norowitz TA, Hagler M, Bowne W, Pincus MR, et al. Immunoglobulin E antibodies from pancreatic cancer patients mediate antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity against pancreatic cancer cells. Clin Exp Immunol. (2008) 153:401–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2008.03726.x
321. Karagiannis SN, Josephs DH, Karagiannis P, Gilbert AE, Saul L, Rudman SM, et al. Recombinant IgE antibodies for passive immunotherapy of solid tumours: from concept towards clinical application. Cancer Immunol Immunother. (2012) 61:1547–64. doi: 10.1007/s00262-011-1162-8
322. Karagiannis SN, Wang Q, East N, Burke F, Riffard S, Bracher MG, et al. Activity of human monocytes in IgE antibody-dependent surveillance and killing of ovarian tumor cells. Eur J Immunol. (2003) 33:1030–40. doi: 10.1002/eji.200323185
323. Karagiannis SN, Bracher MG, Beavil RL, Beavil AJ, Hunt J, McCloskey N, et al. Role of IgE receptors in IgE antibody-dependent cytotoxicity and phagocytosis of ovarian tumor cells by human monocytic cells. Cancer Immunol Immunother. (2007) 57:247–63. doi: 10.1007/s00262-007-0371-7
324. Karagiannis SN, Bracher MG, Hunt J, McCloskey N, Beavil RL, Beavil AJ, et al. IgE-antibody-dependent immunotherapy of solid tumors: cytotoxic and phagocytic mechanisms of eradication of ovarian cancer cells. J Immunol. (2007) 179:2832–43. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.179.5.2832
325. Pellizzari G, Bax HJ, Josephs DH, Gotovina J, Jensen-Jarolim E, Spicer JF, et al. Harnessing therapeutic igE antibodies to re-educate macrophages against cancer. Trends Mol Med. (2020) 26:615–26. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2020.03.002
326. Pellizzari G, Hoskin C, Crescioli S, Mele S, Gotovina J, Chiaruttini G, et al. IgE re-programs alternatively-activated human macrophages towards pro-inflammatory anti-tumoural states. EBioMedicine. (2019) 43:67–81. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.03.080
327. Osborn G, López-Abente J, Adams R, Laddach R, Grandits M, Bax HJ, et al. Hyperinflammatory repolarisation of ovarian cancer patient macrophages by anti-tumour IgE antibody, MOv18, restricts an immunosuppressive macrophage:Treg cell interaction. Nat Commun. (2025) 16:2903. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-57870-y
328. Nakamura M, Souri EA, Osborn G, Laddach R, Chauhan J, Stavraka C, et al. IgE activates monocytes from cancer patients to acquire a pro-inflammatory phenotype. Cancers. (2020) 12:3376. doi: 10.3390/cancers12113376
329. Yang R, Chen Z, Liang L, Ao S, Zhang J, Chang Z, et al. Fc Fragment of IgE Receptor Ig (FCER1G) acts as a key gene involved in cancer immune infiltration and tumour microenvironment. Immunology. (2023) 168:302–19. doi: 10.1111/imm.13557
330. Platzer B, Elpek KG, Cremasco V, Baker K, Stout MM, Schultz C, et al. IgE/fcϵRI-mediated antigen cross-presentation by dendritic cells enhances anti-tumor immune responses. Cell Rep. (2015) 10:1487–95. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.02.015
331. Josephs DH, Spicer JF, Corrigan CJ, Gould HJ, and Karagiannis SN. Epidemiological associations of allergy, IgE and cancer. Clin Exp Allergy J Br Soc Allergy Clin Immunol. (2013) 43:1110–23. doi: 10.1111/cea.12178
332. Jensen-Jarolim E, Achatz G, Turner MC, Karagiannis S, Legrand F, Capron M, et al. AllergoOncology: the role of IgE-mediated allergy in cancer. Allergy. (2008) 63:1255–66.
333. Jensen-Jarolim E and Pawelec G. The nascent field of AllergoOncology. Cancer Immunol Immunother. (2012) 61:1355–7. doi: 10.1007/s00262-012-1315-4
334. Wulaningsih W, Holmberg L, Garmo H, Karagiannis SN, Ahlstedt S, Malmstrom H, et al. Investigating the association between allergen-specific immunoglobulin E, cancer risk and survival. OncoImmunology. (2016) 5:e1154250. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2016.1154250
335. Cui Y and Hill AW. Atopy and specific cancer sites: a review of epidemiological studies. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. (2016) 51:338–52. doi: 10.1007/s12016-016-8559-2
336. Schwartzbaum J, Seweryn M, Holloman C, Harris R, Handelman SK, Rempala GA, et al. Association between prediagnostic allergy-related serum cytokines and glioma. PloS One. (2015) 10:e0137503. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137503
337. Amjadi P, Hosseini F, Zaboli E, Eslami-Jouybari M, Asgarian-Omran H, Hedayatizadeh-Omran A, et al. Total IgE levels in patients with hematologic Malignancies. World Allergy Organ J. (2025) 18:101050. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2025.101050
338. Di Gioacchino M, Della Valle L, Allegra A, Pioggia G, and Gangemi S. AllergoOncology: Role of immune cells and immune proteins. Clin Transl Allergy. (2022) 12:e12133. doi: 10.1002/clt2.12133
339. Ferastraoaru D, Gross R, and Rosenstreich D. Increased Malignancy incidence in IgE deficient patients not due to concomitant Common Variable Immunodeficiency. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. (2017) 119:267–73. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2017.07.006
340. Ferastraoaru D and Rosenstreich D. IgE deficiency and prior diagnosis of Malignancy. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. (2018) 121:613–8. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2018.07.036
341. Ferastraoaru D, Schwartz D, and Rosenstreich D. Increased Malignancy rate in children with igE deficiency: A single-center experience. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. (2021) 43:e472–7. doi: 10.1097/MPH.0000000000001898
342. Staff C, Magnusson CGM, Hojjat-Farsangi M, Mosolits S, Liljefors M, Frödin JE, et al. Induction of igM, igA and igE antibodies in colorectal cancer patients vaccinated with a recombinant CEA protein. J Clin Immunol. (2012) 32:855–65. doi: 10.1007/s10875-012-9662-7
343. Daniels-Wells TR, Helguera G, Leuchter RK, Quintero R, Kozman M, Rodríguez JA, et al. A novel IgE antibody targeting the prostate-specific antigen as a potential prostate cancer therapy. BMC Can. (2013) 13:195. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-13-195
344. Daniels TR, Leuchter RK, Quintero R, Helguera G, Rodríguez JA, Martínez-Maza O, et al. Targeting HER2/neu with a fully human IgE to harness the allergic reaction against cancer cells. Cancer Immunol Immunother. (2012) 61:991–1003. doi: 10.1007/s00262-011-1150-z
345. Chauhan J, McCraw A, Nakamura M, Osborn G, Sow H, Cox V, et al. IgE antibodies against cancer: efficacy and safety. Antibodies. (2020) 9:55. doi: 10.3390/antib9040055
346. Penichet ML and Jensen-Jarolim E eds. Cancer and igE [Internet]. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press. Available online at: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-1-60761-451-7 (Accessed January 2010).
347. Jacqueline C and Finn OJ. Antibodies specific for disease-associated antigens (DAA) expressed in non-malignant diseases reveal potential new tumor-associated antigens (TAA) for immunotherapy or immunoprevention. Semin Immunol. (2020) 47:101394. doi: 10.1016/j.smim.2020.101394
348. Gould HJ, Mackay GA, Karagiannis SN, O’Toole CM, Marsh PJ, Daniel BE, et al. Comparison of IgE and IgG antibody-dependent cytotoxicityin vitro and in a SCID mouse xenograft model of ovarian carcinoma. Eur J Immunol. (1999) 29:3527–37. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4141(199911)29:11<3527::AID-IMMU3527>3.0.CO;2-5
349. Karagiannis P, Singer J, Hunt J, Gan SKE, Rudman SM, Mechtcheriakova D, et al. Characterisation of an engineered trastuzumab IgE antibody and effector cell mechanisms targeting HER2/neu-positive tumour cells. Cancer Immunol Immunother. (2009) 58:915–30. doi: 10.1007/s00262-008-0607-1
350. Galli SJ, Grimbaldeston M, and Tsai M. Immunomodulatory mast cells: negative, as well as positive, regulators of immunity. Nat Rev Immunol. (2008) 8:478–86. doi: 10.1038/nri2327
351. Marichal T, Tsai M, and Galli SJ. Mast cells: potential positive and negative roles in tumor biology. Cancer Immunol Res. (2013) 1:269–79. doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-13-0119
352. Ribatti D and Crivellato E. Mast cells, angiogenesis, and tumour growth. Biochim Biophys Acta BBA - Mol Basis Dis. (2012) 1822:2–8. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2010.11.010
353. Coussens LM, Raymond WW, Bergers G, Laig-Webster M, Behrendtsen O, Werb Z, et al. Inflammatory mast cells up-regulate angiogenesis during squamous epithelial carcinogenesis. Genes Dev. (1999) 13:1382–97. doi: 10.1101/gad.13.11.1382
354. de Souza DA, Toso VD, Campos MR de C, Lara VS, Oliver C, and Jamur MC. Expression of mast cell proteases correlates with mast cell maturation and angiogenesis during tumor progression. Bonini MG editor. PloS One. (2012) 7:e40790. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040790
355. Johansson A, Rudolfsson S, Hammarsten P, Halin S, Pietras K, Jones J, et al. Mast cells are novel independent prognostic markers in prostate cancer and represent a target for therapy. Am J Pathol. (2010) 177:1031–41. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2010.100070
356. Ribatti D, Ennas MG, Vacca A, Ferreli F, Nico B, Orru S, et al. Tumor vascularity and tryptase-positive mast cells correlate with a poor prognosis in melanoma: Tryptase-positive mast cells and prognosis in melanoma. Eur J Clin Invest. (2003) 33:420–5. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2362.2003.01152.x
357. Nonomura N, Takayama H, Nishimura K, Oka D, Nakai Y, Shiba M, et al. Decreased number of mast cells infiltrating into needle biopsy specimens leads to a better prognosis of prostate cancer. Br J Can. (2007) 97:952–6. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603962
358. Strouch MJ, Cheon EC, Salabat MR, Krantz SB, Gounaris E, Melstrom LG, et al. Crosstalk between mast cells and pancreatic cancer cells contributes to pancreatic tumor progression. Clin Cancer Res. (2010) 16:2257–65. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-1230
359. Elpek GO, Gelen T, Aksoy NH, Erdogan A, Dertsiz L, Demircan A, et al. The prognostic relevance of angiogenesis and mast cells in squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus. J Clin Pathol. (2001) 54:940–4. doi: 10.1136/jcp.54.12.940
360. Glimelius I, Edström A, Fischer M, Nilsson G, Sundström C, Molin D, et al. Angiogenesis and mast cells in Hodgkin lymphoma. Leukemia. (2005) 19:2360–2. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2403992
361. Khazaie K, Blatner NR, Khan MW, Gounari F, Gounaris E, Dennis K, et al. The significant role of mast cells in cancer. Cancer Metastasis Rev. (2011) 30:45–60. doi: 10.1007/s10555-011-9286-z
362. Stoyanov E, Uddin M, Mankuta D, Dubinett SM, and Levi-Schaffer F. Mast cells and histamine enhance the proliferation of non-small cell lung cancer cells. Lung Can. (2012) 75:38–44. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2011.05.029
363. De Vries VC, Wasiuk A, Bennett KA, Benson MJ, Elgueta R, Waldschmidt TJ, et al. Mast cell degranulation breaks peripheral tolerance. Am J Transpl. (2009) 9:2270–80. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02755.x
364. Wasiuk A de VV Nowak EC and Noelle RJ. Mast cells in allergy and tumor disease. In: Penichet ML and Jensen-Jarolim E, editors. Cancer and IgE: introducing the concept of allergoon cology. Springer, New York (2010). p. pp 137–158.
365. Teo PZ, Utz PJ, and Mollick JA. Using the allergic immune system to target cancer: activity of IgE antibodies specific for human CD20 and MUC1. Cancer Immunol Immunother. (2012) 61:2295–309. doi: 10.1007/s00262-012-1299-0
366. Hu G, Wang S, Zhong K, Xu F, Huang L, Chen W, et al. Tumor-associated tissue eosinophilia predicts favorable clinical outcome in solid tumors: a meta-analysis. BMC Can. (2020) 20:454. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-06966-3
367. on behalf of the MRC Upper GI Cancer Working Party, Cuschieri A, IC T, and Weeden S. Influence of pathological tumour variables on long-term survival in resectable gastric cancer. Br J Can. (2002) 86:674–9. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600161
368. Dorta RG, Landman G, Kowalski LP, Lauris JRP, Latorre MRDO, and Oliveira DT. Tumour-associated tissue eosinophilia as a prognostic factor in oral squamous cell carcinomas: Tumour-associated eosinophilia. Histopathology. (2002) 41:152–7. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2559.2002.01437.x
369. Fernández-Aceñero MJ, Galindo-Gallego M, Sanz J, and Aljama A. Prognostic influence of tumor-associated eosinophilic infiltrate in colorectal carcinoma. Cancer. (2000) 88:1544–8. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(20000401)88:7<1544::AID-CNCR7>3.0.CO;2-S
370. Ishibashi S, Ohashi Y, Suzuki T, Miyazaki S, Moriya T, Satomi S, et al. Tumor-associated tissue eosinophilia in human esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Anticancer Res. (2006) 26:1419–24.
371. von Wasielewski R, Seth S, Franklin J, Fischer R, Hübner K, Hansmann ML, et al. Tissue eosinophilia correlates strongly with poor prognosis in nodular sclerosing Hodgkin’s disease, allowing for known prognostic factors. Blood. (2000) 95:1207–13. doi: 10.1182/blood.V95.4.1207.004k34_1207_1213
372. Cormier SA. Pivotal Advance: Eosinophil infiltration of solid tumors is an early and persistent inflammatory host response. J Leukoc Biol. (2006) 79:1131–9. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0106027
373. Legrand F, Driss V, Delbeke M, Loiseau S, Hermann E, Dombrowicz D, et al. Human eosinophils exert TNF-α and granzyme A-mediated tumoricidal activity toward colon carcinoma cells. J Immunol. (2010) 185:7443–51. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1000446
374. Huland E and Huland H. Tumor-associated eosinophilia in interleukin-2-treated patients: evidence of toxic eosinophil degranulation on bladder cancer cells. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. (1992) 118:463–7. doi: 10.1007/BF01629431
375. Mattes J, Hulett M, Xie W, Hogan S, Rothenberg ME, Foster P, et al. Immunotherapy of cytotoxic T cell–resistant tumors by T helper 2 cells. J Exp Med. (2003) 197:387–93. doi: 10.1084/jem.20021683
376. Gatault S, Delbeke M, Driss V, Sarazin A, Dendooven A, Kahn JE, et al. IL-18 is involved in eosinophil-mediated tumoricidal activity against a colon carcinoma cell line by upregulating LFA-1 and ICAM-1. J Immunol. (2015) 195:2483–92. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1402914
377. Platzer B, Stout M, and Fiebiger E. Functions of dendritic-cell-bound IgE in allergy. Mol Immunol. (2015) 68:116–9. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2015.05.016
378. Lauc G, KriÅ¡tić J, ZoldoÅ¡ V, and Glycans â€. the third revolution in evolution. Front Genet. 5. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2014.00145/abstract 2014-05-23.
379. Lu LL, Chung AW, Rosebrock TR, Ghebremichael M, Yu WH, Grace PS, et al. A functional role for antibodies in tuberculosis. Cell. (2016) 167:433–43. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.08.072
380. Wang TT, Maamary J, Tan GS, Bournazos S, Davis CW, Krammer F, et al. Anti-HA glycoforms drive B cell affinity selection and determine influenza vaccine efficacy. Cell. (2015) 162:160–9. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.06.026
381. Wang TT, Sewatanon J, Memoli MJ, Wrammert J, Bournazos S, Bhaumik SK, et al. IgG antibodies to dengue enhanced for FcγRIIIA binding determine disease severity. Science. (2017) 355:395–8. doi: 10.1126/science.aai8128
382. Espy C, Morelle W, Kavian N, Grange P, Goulvestre C, Viallon V, et al. Sialylation levels of anti-proteinase 3 antibodies are associated with the activity of granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Wegener’s). Arthritis Rheumatol. (2011) 63:2105–15. doi: 10.1002/art.30362
383. Pucić M, Knezević A, Vidic J, Adamczyk B, Novokmet M, Polasek O, et al. High throughput isolation and glycosylation analysis of IgG-variability and heritability of the IgG glycome in three isolated human populations. Mol Cell Proteomics MCP. (2011) 10:M111.010090.
384. Robertson MW and Liu FT. Heterogeneous IgE glycoforms characterized by differential recognition of an endogenous lectin (IgE-binding protein). J Immunol Baltim Md. (1950) 147:3024–30.
385. Bird JA, Crain M, and Varshney P. Food allergen panel testing often results in misdiagnosis of food allergy. J Pediatr. (2015) 166:97–100. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2014.07.062
386. Randomized trial of peanut consumption in infants at risk for peanut allergy. N Engl J Med. (2016) 375:398. doi: 10.1056/NEJMx150044
Keywords: autoimmune diseases, cancer, IgE glycosylation, immunoglobulin E, parasitic infections
Citation: Thaçi K, Gyorgypal A, Anthony RM and Conroy ME (2026) The role of immunoglobulin E in non-atopic disorders. Front. Immunol. 16:1728940. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1728940
Received: 20 October 2025; Accepted: 09 December 2025; Revised: 09 December 2025;
Published: 06 January 2026.
Edited by:
Geovane Dias-Lopes, Rio de Janeiro State Federal University, BrazilReviewed by:
Roger Y. Tam, Health Canada, CanadaPaul Engeroff, Bern University Hospital, Switzerland
Copyright © 2026 Thaçi, Gyorgypal, Anthony and Conroy. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Kujtim Thaçi, a3VqdGltLnRoYXFpQHVidC11bmkubmV0; Michelle E. Conroy, TUVDT05ST1lAbWdoLmhhcnZhcmQuZWR1
†These authors have contributed equally to this work